Fascinating topic! 📚🤖 The idea of AI generating research papers from data is mind-blowing. Can't wait to dive into this video! 🚀

It would be interesting to dive just a bit deeper and see if ChatGPT really wrote from the data it was given or whether it sneakily went out and plagiarized results from other papers written from the same data set. As you mentioned, its findings weren't in any way novel. It's at least plausible that it reverse-engineered its paper from others out there.

🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:00 📝 Researchers claim AI generated papers autonomously from data. 01:23 🧹 AI helps clean and analyze large datasets effectively. 03:15 📊 Researchers used a methodical process of prompts to generate the paper. 04:24 🚫 AI-generated paper lacks novel insights and could struggle with peer review. 06:02 📜 AI-created citations have issues, and paper references are outdated. 07:39 💡 AI's potential in research, like chemistry tasks, is promising. 09:04 🕵️‍♂️ Concerns about AI potentially facilitating P-hacking in research. 10:09 👥 ChatGPT can assist as a co-pilot in research but needs human oversight. 11:19 📧 Sign up for the creator's newsletter for more information on academic resources. Made with HARPA AI

I would LOVE to see this applied to more complicated systems like in engineering, chemistry, physics, and maybe even mathematics. Unfortunately I don't see this going very far as the datasets get bigger and with more moving parts. We'll have to find ways to consolidate variables, find bridges between various seemingly unrelated concepts, and other ideas that I probably can't even imagine right now.

@pathmonkofficial

10 ай бұрын

We were thinking the same thing, great minds think alike!

A law firm here in the US was recently admonished by a judge for using chat GPT to write a response to a legal case. The issue is, chat GPT sited cases that did not exist. The lawyer failed to check the references before submitting the response to the court.

@truth.speaker

10 ай бұрын

The problem of phantom quotes will be solved soon. He could have and should have googled it

@ThomasTomiczek

10 ай бұрын

Nope, the lawyers should have lost their license for lying under oath - like that they checked all the details. They also "checked" that ChatGPT was telling the truth by ASKING IT. As stupid as it gets.

Thanks for the great video. I've seen the future and it's not here yet.

Excellent video Andy.

Mr Stapleton's knowledge is perfect for helping make a training set for a paper critic agent. The agent can listen to transcripts of this youtube channel and look for and use his advice directly to improve its capabilities. Mimicry is a form of learning. People like Mr Stapleton are suited to contributing to the growth of paper critic AI agents. It would preferably require yet another AI agent to automate the training of a paper critic agent in the next phase (just reading his youtube video transcripts for the purpose of learning his ability to identify known weaknesses in known scientific papers) but before that happens in phase one, humans like him can show good examples and counterexamples manually with good prompt engineering.

I wonder if chatbots’ inability to handle citations/references may be related to many journals limit access. If that is the case, with open access publishing becoming more normative, this issue should resolve itself…

@garyatwood4398

9 ай бұрын

That's a good question. Journal paywalls are definitely a "problem" but I don't feel like it's the issue here. Remember, ChatGPT is basically just trying to guess what the next word(s) are based on its statistical analysis of the content it's consumed (a gross oversimplification I know). It's not looking at an article, finding a fact, and citing that article in the way that people do. That's why you'll see fabricated references that include authors who have actually written on the topic (they just didn't write the fake paper being cited) or journals listed that actually have published in whatever field the article is about.

Omg❤❤❤, what a cute sweater!❤❤❤❤❤

Now that's a beard, yes sir 💪🏼

This project's weaknesses can be addressed and built upon. Make another AI agent that criticizes the novelty of any paper, and make the original agent keep working to find and synthesize novel topics until the critic agent(s) is satisfied, that is, they can't find sufficient coverage of the candidate topic. Reuse of the proposed paper critic agent is evident too -- the journals can use it for their own purposes, and so can academic advisors.

Loved the sweater

I wonder if a web search ability itself could already help a lot "search for new papers in this area and use the knowledge to improve your work" eg

I wish I could see if it used plugins like Scholar AI, which is great at finding the resources necessary for writing literature reviews.

Great video as always - a small editing error at 10:42, just a heads up

@DrAndyStapleton

10 ай бұрын

Haha! Thanks for catching that. Used the editor to cut it out.

@BenTheBSC

10 ай бұрын

@@DrAndyStapleton Happy to help :D Consider it restitution for helping me get through my Masters.

Omg 😭 There was already so much crap out there. Now there's so much more.

I'd like to show your videos to colleagues who might be interested. Since their English is not up to the speed of your speech: any ideas which AI I could use to transcribe your videos? And which AI to get an abstract of the content?

4:20 How to acces nature

These AI videos are making me anxious. Where will all of this lead to when the technology improves? Is research and academia becoming a thing of the past?

@Colby_0-3_IRL_and_title_fights

10 ай бұрын

I think ultimately the academic process will always require human scrutiny in terms of both the experimental process and the peer review process

@REAAX

10 ай бұрын

Human will just conduct the experiment

@yosef5508

10 ай бұрын

We are moving toward human heads without a brain.

@WhySoBroke

10 ай бұрын

@@markhall2414me too, waste of tax payers money

@456dave7

10 ай бұрын

@@WhySoBroke and you typed that on a device based on inventions from academia, lol

Garbage in = garbage out. 😂😂😂

Automated p-hacking w NLP.

The difference between ChatGPT and the average academic is that ChatGPT is quite a bit less of a formulaic NPC

First.... In vacation in Langkawi 😂

@DrAndyStapleton

10 ай бұрын

Have fun

Checking each and every paper reference is a boring job, perfect for automation.

Pappers written by AI will be peer-reviewd by another AI, and read and reused by some other AI. We won't need scientisats and their publications, the system of publications will turn authonomous

Why write a paper when only the AIs will read them

So, 2018 paper is old?lol😂

speaking of diabetes for personal experience go low carb and IF.

So in conclusion: Artificial intelligence isn't all that intelligent. :D

Why are you yelling?

Seriously this guy always click baits us. Stop pretending in the intro you found something amazing that will help us all out and then let us down later as usual.

@gianluca.pastorelli

10 ай бұрын

This guy? Man, everyone on KZread does that, that's how you make money here

@nondescriptnyc

10 ай бұрын

Hmmmm. Could it be that you aren’t actively involved with empirical research and, thus, can’t see how profound this discussion is? I totally saw what “this guy” promised…and more!

Great more junk spam papers to check.

In the last 6 months of using it. I’ve concluded AI = overrated