I have one of the first ones, it's the best feeling radio I have ever owned.

Hello, you forgot one important improvement and that is internal 8GB memory, so no need for Sd card anymore, if U dont want it for backup / logging etc.

Great video…. The X20 Pro has me giving Frsky hard look. Long time JR and Spektrum guy here but a the functionality of the Pro seems to match up and/or exceed that of my trusted DX18. Before making the leap to the NX20 I want to give the X20 Pro a serious look.

@RTRCTV

3 ай бұрын

Would be fair to say it exceeds the spektrum stuff in pretty much every way

Hi Rob, I have the X20S and simply filled the module-bay side ridges down so a Crossfire Nano would fit. Can you please tell me if the X20-Pro module bay side ridges are identical to the X20S ?

@RTRCTV

8 ай бұрын

Hey.. Identical. This bit is also in plastic so could be filed down.

Yes buy one its fantastic. I bought 2.

Years ago I bought a Frysky Horus after having good experiences with Taranis. But in the end it cost me 3 planes due to the poor quality and the danger of parts flying around out of control.😅

@RTRCTV

9 ай бұрын

I owned a horus for years.. Never once had am issue.

@oliundtrude5318

9 ай бұрын

Since you have so many different systems, each one is not in use for long. In my case the cables to the field sensors on both sides of the control sticks are broken. They were cheap plastic insulation cables that were installed too short.

@alwaysflying6540

7 ай бұрын

​@RTRCTV my friends fly these radios in jets with zero issues. Great radio's

@RTRCTV

7 ай бұрын

@@oliundtrude5318 maybe it's not a question of how long you own them.. but how much air time? I certainly get allot of airtime. Way more than the average flyer.

Does it include the S20 HD video receiver (receiving HD video on the screen)?

@RTRCTV

9 ай бұрын

Nope

Sorry to jump in here with a stupid Q but does it work with Spektrum receivers?

@RTRCTV

16 күн бұрын

If you use an external multi protocol module, then it can work with spektrum rx no issue

question i have is both external antennas appear to be 2.4 surly when using 868mhz this would be risking damage to the radio due to reflected power? Would the r9 standard antenna not be better?

@RTRCTV

4 ай бұрын

The 900 on the pro is internal antenna only. By design. Nothing to worry about

@mickbroad9973

4 ай бұрын

Why is there a port for 868 external antenna then? It should have the correct length antenna for the port

@RTRCTV

4 ай бұрын

@@mickbroad9973 the port on on the x20 pro is two 2.4g ports for the twin protocol. In the x20 (plastic case) yiu have a 2.4 external and 900 external. In the pro you have a 900 built into the handle. If you refer to the u.fl on the internal module that is not connected to anything - it's not used. The physical use of it is disabled in software, so no antenna needed on it.

are you able to rotate the sticks to an angle like the x20s

@RTRCTV

9 ай бұрын

Not tried myself but it has same gimbals as x20 so likely yes.

@brianroberts5062

7 ай бұрын

Yes

Has there been a lua for this which allows ExpressLRS? I am highly inttterested in this transmitter

@RTRCTV

4 ай бұрын

Yes. For ages. Works well. New 1.5.1 ethos will support elrs at 911k and possibly higher if your module supports it.

@bigeclipse718

4 ай бұрын

​@RTRCTV but the pro does not have a module. It's internal so that's what I meant.

@RTRCTV

4 ай бұрын

@@bigeclipse718 you would have to use an external elrs module.

@bigeclipse718

4 ай бұрын

​@@RTRCTV ah that stinks. I was hoping that maybe they created a Lua script for the pro version to work with the internal module.

@RTRCTV

4 ай бұрын

@@bigeclipse718 the internal module is a totally different hardware base to what elrs uses. Not possible to do that

What is range ? Which one is best Skyroid m12l vs frsky tandem x20 pro 😢😢😢😢

@RTRCTV

3 ай бұрын

Never used a skyroid so complete unknown. Personally looking at it the skyroid is designed for a single job. Uav commercial operations. I am sure it's great. But prob a bit limited in it's offering.

@Thomas--Jaleby

3 ай бұрын

@@RTRCTV sir what is controll range of x20 pro ? Can we look live fpv camera in screen?

@RTRCTV

3 ай бұрын

@@Thomas--Jaleby The pro does not have fpv built into the display. Range wise.. Technically with the twin lora system or tandem rx you can go 30+ km. Or plug a module in and you could go further.

@Thomas--Jaleby

3 ай бұрын

@@RTRCTV thanks ❤️

aluminium casing ? no winter flying, any way looking good

@RTRCTV

10 ай бұрын

Doubt will be an issue. Certainly never had a problem with the aluminium case on the jeti radios.

@cobra4829

10 ай бұрын

@@RTRCTVThe radio will be fine😄, just the hands are freezing🥶

@CertsUAsPilot

9 ай бұрын

@@RTRCTV As much as it costs, it should include heated hand grips.

@RTRCTV

9 ай бұрын

@@CertsUAsPilot Well that would drop your battery power 🙂 But seriously.. thats not fair. The radio is more capable and as well built as many radios that command an even higher price tag.

@CertsUAsPilot

9 ай бұрын

@@RTRCTV I was just kidding. I had Futaba and JR radios for years, cost from $480 - $800. I decided to give FrSky a try and bought the X20S last year. FrSky X20S gives the best bang for your bucks. I'm glad I switched and not going back to Futaba.

I honestly don't see the point of this. What does it have on the S? A few momentary switches and 2 extra trims. And inbuilt TWIN. Text to speech is definitley not there yet and more of a gimmick than anything when you have a touchscreen. I can throw a TWIN module on the X18 or X20. Or ELRS. Aluminum case is a con to some ppl especially in cold weather. I can and have installed a locking switch on my S for esc/ignition. The X18 has two extra trims and I honestly feel for those who are thumbers or not using a tray the X18 is probably the better radio. And its $275... I know I know, if I don't like it I shouldn't buy it. Fair. I just feel like this thing is a status symbol for 50% more money than the X20S and barely any more capabilities. Now if the X24 comes out with built in wifi and will update over the air and a whole bunch of other stuff... yeah. I think I'll wait for that. You definitely break it down well at the end tho. Its a want not a need. We only go around once and he who has the most stuff at the end wins right?

@bigeclipse718

4 ай бұрын

It's not two extra momentary switches. It has two extra push button 2 position switches, adjustable sliders, extra trims and comes with a hardcase and receiver. If you subtract 175$ for the receiver and the case then it brings x20pro in a more desirable range.

@short5stick

3 ай бұрын

Yep Text to speech sucks. Audio sucks too. I like the X20s red better. I have both and like the red. Now if they used the the internal memory like the X18 it would be better.

@bigeclipse718

3 ай бұрын

@short5stick the audio on mine is actually better. All the switches and even the gimbals are proprietary to the Pro model. They are of a higher quality and are actually different parts compared to the other models. Again, the other models are great but that's what you are paying for. The built in TWIN will be a game changer as they start pushing that more than tandem to compete with ELRS

no. Get the red X20s . Audio is better

I feel the X20 pro is a slap in the face of the long term Frsky users. You're paying a big premium for just a aluminum shell and some bragging rights. I see people buying this transmitter that never would have given Frsky a fair shot because of the lower prices but now it gets them some sort of status they are suddenly interested in Frsky. What annoys me the most is that those people get a numbered plaque and a so called limited edititon transmitter. As if they are anymore special then the people that bought the X20 an the X18 and made it popular in the first place. The whole ELRS fork saga in the Twin module is a whole different issue and such a typical Frsky thing to do. Frsky makes a nice radio but they don't seem to learn from the mistakes they made in the past.

@RTRCTV

10 ай бұрын

Not really sure I agree with your views.. But hey.. Each to their own.

@woltervandenberg

10 ай бұрын

It's other little thing as well. I bought a 130 dollar tray for my X20s that can't be used with the X20 pro because they decided to change the profile of the transmitter just a little. And don't get me started on the loop for the neckstrap on the twin x lite (and the X12) or the X20 not being compatible with 3d party modules, what were they smoking to come up with that. They make fantastic radio's and I love Ethos as an operating system but they keep fucking up when it comes to small details like that. @@RTRCTV

@dr0n3droid

9 ай бұрын

While I do agree with much of the "Puts the 'F' in Frsky" sentiment, I'll kindly ask anyone who does not own a Taranis X9D manufactured in 2013 to sit down. If this radio were running open/edgeTX with 2.4&900 elrs, many of us would turn our heads again. None of us are interested in your "FRSKY" software.

@RTRCTV

9 ай бұрын

@@dr0n3droid a broad statement. Possibly within your peer group this is the case. But for many people and likely a higher number they found opentx / edge tx too complex to use. The x20 is one of frsky best selling radios. Commercials clearly tell a different story?

@user-yq5dm5gq2q

7 ай бұрын

I don't need 20 channels. Do you know if there is a smaller? And what is the software?

My answer: No.

@RTRCTV

2 ай бұрын

At least give a decent answer with reasons?