You do such a great job with these videos. Straight forward and too the point. Covering the do's and don't s. Thank you very much.

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

Thank you JD. That’s very much appreciated.

Excellent video Darren, I just made an order for this receiver for my next Turbine Jet! Thanks.

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

Glad it helped Bobby.

Very informative video 😀

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

Thanks Tom

Good info Darren 👍

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

Thanks 👍

Great video, my X9D+ is still my main driver but I've bought a X20S & learning everything I can about it - will switch over most stuff in next 18 months but boy do I like my Taranis :)

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

The Taranis still work great I think. The X9D may be a bit dated now, with the old skool screen. But, it works. It works well.

Excelente!!! muchas gracias 👍

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

You're welcome Marcelo 👍

Awesome vid Darren, right on time as I have 4 of these coming tomorrow. I agree it’s kinda wonky to put SBUS in on port 1, what the heck were they thinking!

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, it is a bit strange. But they have taken my feedback on board. So hopefully in future receivers, the dedicated pins will be at the high end of the outputs.

Excellent video. Is there anyway you can show how to get the stabilization piece on the x9d? I’m not sure which screens to go through for the calibration of the receiver

Great review - wondering about sensitivity? Maybe a range or other test compared to the older versions?

Thanks!

@MrD

9 ай бұрын

Thank you Randall 👍🏻

Excellent as always 👍. On these stabilized receivers which channel is controlling 'Gain' and how is it assigned to a pot or slider on the transmitter ? Thanks E

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

Thanks Eoin. With regards to the channels for controlling gain etc. It's the same as the SR10 Pro etc kzread.info/dash/bejne/pIl_q6SKlNDcebw.html

Hey, great video! With firmware 1.0.5 out, the stabilization functionality is via Lua scripts under the system settings, and not in the device configuration settings. A video showing how to setup flaps, with that receiver will help many. I use channels 7, and 8 for flaps, and I turned off the channel 7-12 stabilization. One can also assign channels 17-18.

Love your videos, they have really helped.. Just want to verify with ethos we can map pins 9 and 10 to other channels to leave them free for the gyro functions.

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

Yes. You can basically put any channel on any output pin. The stabilisation uses channels 9-12.

Hello!, question just to be sure. I have calibrated the gyro as you mention. But in Ethos , from telemetry I am getting P.Angle negative when the plane supposedly face up. That's correct? I tried to look into the documentation with no luck. Confusing. Thanks for the video

hello, do you have a video on how to configure vertical stabilization for the tork roll maneuver

Cant wait till you do this and its advance functons - RB25S I have hover n knife edge set n used them ...keep your power n speed up!

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

Hey Fred. An RB35S has arrived. So there will be a video on that soon. Thanks for the tips for the knife edge and hover 👍🏻

I'm a bit confused. As far as I can tell, all of the ACCESS receivers are both ACCESS and ACCST. And have been for a while. (correction, only the plus series and the RX series have dual access. So the G-RX8, RX6R, R-XSR, G-RX6, RX4R can all have either ACCST or ACCESS firmware installed. Where as the PLUS series, R10+ and the SR10+ have firmware that works with either ACCST or ACCESS, no swapping firmware needed. (note, the M+ is not part of the PLUS series)) However, I've been out of the hobby for a bit, and I missed the whole "Frsky sucks" chapter. Did they just fix this compatibility issue and I just happened to come back in at the right time? Right now Frsky seems to have a great balance between the old stuff and the new stuff. I have a new Horus X10S transmitter, but I can still easily use all my old receivers. I did decide to the change to version 2.x, I just decided to do everything at once and be done with it. So nothing I own was made obsolete. And it looks like they still make ACCST stuff, although you mentioned in a previous video that Frsky was no longer developing it. And if everything comes as both ACCESS and ACCST, then it seems like they sort of are still developing the ACCST stuff. It seems like someone could do a video on how Frsky has recovered from their perceived missteps. There are a pile of videos on how Frsky screwed up. But there is nothing on how it might be better now, probably because their "fixes" were gradual and took place incrementally. ETHOS is great, Frsky costs much less that that other big company, especially if you need a lot of channels, telemetry is easy and inexpensive. And with the new Lemon DSMP module, you can easily drive all of you DSM planes. (it's hard to beat E-Flite an HobbyZone for the UMX stuff, and you cannot really change out the receivers in those.)

@pfeerick

Жыл бұрын

Darren would know, but I thought it was only the transmitters that were dual ACCESS/ACCSTv2, not the receivers.

@rsl3600

Жыл бұрын

@@pfeerick See my correction, above.

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

Sorry for the late reply. I wanted to reply to this on a computer, as it's easier for larger messages and responses than on the mobile. I'll reply to each paragraph, so hopefully it all makes sense. No not quite. On 2.4GHz, ACCESS receivers historically have only worked with ACCESS transmitter module. The first lines of ACCESS receivers were the Archer series. These, up until the Archer Plus series, have been ACCESS only. There were, however, ACCST receivers that could be flashed with ACCESS firmware. These include the RX series that you mention. They can run ACCESS firmware and some can use OTA receiver options. But they are not fully ACCESS receivers which can have OTA updates. With regards to the Plus and +. They are actually two different things. There is the Archer Plus series (SR10+ and R10+ currently), which supports ACCST and ACCESS seamlessly, and some other features. There are also receivers which have a + after their name (including the R10+ and M+). The + symbol signifies that the output pins can be reconfigured. -------------------- In all honesty, the whole "FrSky sucks" thing was massively blown out of proportion, and false claims made against FrSky. One of those claims was back when ACCST v2 and ACCESS were released, that older customers were being dropped and forced to upgrade. This has been proven not to be the case. Forgetting the new Archer Plus releases; you can still buy receivers now that will work on the original X9D, without problems. The same goes for the R9 system. There has not been a point where people with older equipment could not buy compatible receivers. ACCST is no longer being updated. But with ACCST v2, the link is very stable. The new Archer Plus line does not mean that ACCST is still being developed. The version of ACCST on my X9D Plus in the video is much older than the Archer Plus series. The series would not have been planned when that firmware was released almost 2 years ago. The magic for the seamless switching is all in the receiver. I imagine it knows if it's not using ACCESS, so then switches to ACCST. -------------------- In all honesty, I don't think the people who are hating on FrSky would pay any attention to a video like that. I have fact checked people on other platforms. And when shown evidence that the claims they are making are false. The either just ignore you and post the same false claims at a later date. Or they change the subject to give another reason why "FrSky suck". Have FrSky done everything well. No. The swapping out of the high speed inverters on the Q-X7 and X10 transmitters, just to spite Crossfire was a bad decision. It only caused problems for their customers. This was remedied on the ACCESS Q-X7 and X10 Express transmitters. But it was really an unnecessary pain for their customers who had bought the earlier transmitters. FrSky did threaten to stop supplying dealers who sold Jumper and RadioMaster transmitters. But, these transmitters are direct clones of an X10 (T16 and TX16S) and Q-X7 (T12 and TX12). So were they really wrong to do this? People also forgot, or chose to ignore, that TBS did the same thing to FrSky a year or two earlier in the Crossfire Vs. R9 period. TBS claimed that FrSky cloned Crossfire. This was later reduced to be just about the Immortal T antenna, which is basically just a semi-rigid dipole. What it was really about is that R9 was being offered at a price point that Crossfire could not compete with. The stupid thing is it didn't matter at the time, as Crossfire then was far superior in terms of ease of use and features. With ACCESS, FrSky closed that gap on the 900MHz side. The TBS threat was also the reason why FrSky responded by swapping out the high speed inverters on the Q-X7 and X10 radios. But other than those two things, the other claims are largely false. - ACCST v2 getting rid of D8: False. If D8 and LR12 worked on ACCST v1 on your transmitter. They will still work on ACCST v2. That's actually why in the video I make the point of showing them ;) The new ISRM module did remove D8 and LR12 support, because it is illegal to produce new products with them on. Same as why Spektrum can no longer make anything with DSM2. - ACCST v2 only being release to encrypt the protocol and make it harder for cloners: False, it fixed a big RF issue I totally agree with the rest of that paragraph. FrSky are making some great equipment at the moment. ETHOS works well and is improving all the time. Best of all, FrSky are listening to what their customers want. There have been changes to hardware and to ETHOS that clearly demonstrate this. And all at a lower price point than the other established and high end brands like Spektrum, Futaba, and Jeti.

Hello, the replacement for SR10 pro is now SR12+ :) If you have a later rx for redundancy you can use Fbus on ch10, then you also have all telemetry from rx redundance. I think later firmware use ch9 now for sbus in. The later fw also has two banks of gyros 1-6 and 7-11, so important to disable second bank if you use ch for other things.

Hi Mr D Thanks for your presentation, you have really help me out again. Does the SXR calibration have to be carried out for the particular model that it is going to be used on, or can the calibration be set then applied to any model? Please advise Thanks

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

The calibration can happened on the bench. Once it’s in the model, perform the self check to make sure the receiver is set for that model.

@roscomonk

Жыл бұрын

@@MrD Great thanks a lot

Hi, so when using a ACCST radio. Does the OpenTx SXR lua script work to configure this reciever?

I have a Access SR10+ receiver in my model airplane, and it was working ok till did a self-check and now it don't work at all. I tried to rebind it but it don't show the receiver on the registration screen. A solid red light on the receiver is on .

I just bought one to try. I am still on ACCST and openTX. Is there a way to map pins 9 and 10 to sat channel 13 and 14 so I can have 10 output Chanel’s while still using 9-12 for the stabilizing functions. Or did just buy the equivalent of the S8R? Thanks

I have just purchased this receiver because I only have the JXT module for my JR 10x. I agree that it would have been nicer with the bigger case and high current plugs. This will be going in my new 110cc Extra 300. BTW I subscribed to your channel

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

Sounds like a nice plane. Have fun 👍🏻

Hi Darren, my SR8 plus Archer has a Stabilization System 1 & 2, is there a way to control the Gain for system 1 and the gain for system 2? Thank you for the great content!!🎉❤

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

They only have a single stabiliser. The 2 pages in the LUA script are just for additional settings. Not all supported in the SR8.

I just got this receiver and I’m trying to use ch9 on a tx16 with edgetx but I’m getting nothing on channel 9 or 10 . Any tips ?

Thank you mister! You could show how to firmewave the FrSky MX+ receiver through this transmitter. Thanks.

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

For the MX+, just treat it as an Archer receiver. Once it’s registered on the transmitter, perform an OTA update. kzread.info/dash/bejne/a6iixcaHdMzUdrA.html

Why did they remove the XT30 connectors ?

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

I don’t know to be honest. Cost? Less case sizes to manufacture?

Hello I bought one of these receivers and a GPS sensor but I can not seem to get the sensor to work. I am also running a 20s. Is this possible? Do you have a video on it?

Thank you for this video, Darren. I just received a 10 plus receiver instead of the 10 Pro that I ordered and was wondering which is the difference between them, and seems to be clear: They sacrificed two channels (or four?) to handle redundancy and SBus in/out. The good news for me is that I don't use either, but I sure need the 10 channels. However, the price difference does not justify to loose the four extra connectors. Good thing though (not for me anyways as my old TX is an X9D flat) is for those having old X9D Plus that now can use this advanced receiver. Have a good one, D.

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

You only lose a maximum of 2 outputs (not channels, you technically don’t lose any). If you want redundancy, you lose output 1. If you want to use SBUS out, you lose another output. But, what would SBUS out be for? It could be to operate multiple servos, which would save on outputs. Or it could be to an SBUS to PWM converter; which will give you channels 9-16. So it’s not all bad. For me, personally. The biggest loss is the XT30 connectors. But, I agree. I wish they had kept using the old case, had the XT30s and SBUS IN and SBUS OUT dedicated ports.

we got one of these for the eflite A10 so we can stick the motionsicrc BAG on it. Seems like a good replacement for the spektrum AR6368 receiver, same size almost, it's got a gyro in it too.

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, a receiver like that would be fine for an EDF A10.

@embededfabrication4482

Жыл бұрын

@@MrD why are the power wires so thin?

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

They’re pretty standard size for a receiver only airplane. They are usually the same cable used for servos, coming from the ESC’s BEC. They only power the receiver and servos.

Hi Darren, great video, very informative. Do you have any videos setting up this receiver with OpenTX or EdgeTX while in Access mode? I ask as when I go into the options on the receiver I can only remap pins to channel assignments and not SBUS in or S-Port. I bought one of these as I would like to have stabilization while having a redundant receiver and could never get it working with the ACCST. So far (short of putting ETHOS on my X10s Express) I have yet to find any way of changing the pin assignments so any help would be appreciated. dave

@MrD

11 ай бұрын

EdgeTX and OpenTX will need to update their firmware to make this happen. There was also another issue where OpenTX/EdgeTX thinks that the receiver is ACCST so can’t perform the OTA updates. FrSKY have said that they are reaching out to the developers of these firmwares. I guess there will be more luck with EdgeTX, as it’s still being actively developed.

@fdm225

11 ай бұрын

Yeah, shortly after posting I found a bug report on edgetx requesting support from the developers. To abbreviate the thread, it seems that FrSKY has no interest in supporting OpenTX/Edgetx and have rested giving out information, which is truly unfortunate. Ethos is nice, and in the future I have hopes that it can replace edgetx, but it's still missing too many features that even the ancient opentx firmware has let alone edgetx.

@MrD

11 ай бұрын

@@fdm225 that’s quite an old issue. I heard about a week or two ago that FrSKY are going to be reaching out to OpenTX/EdgeTX. No idea on timescales. I can appreciate FrSKY being careful with the data they choose to release. They have had a lot of technology cloned. ETHOS 1.5 should bridge the gap with regards to missing features. What are the main things you are missing from EdgeTX. Personally, my X10S Express is still on OpenTX. I find EdgeTX’s interface too annoying.

Any thoughts on why a Radiomaster Tx16s can't seem to bind to a FrSky Archer Plus SR10+? I've tried every sub-protocol under the FrSky X2 protocol.

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

I don't believe they are compatible. I've had no way of testing. But have heard from other people that they will not bind.

Hi Darren…great videos nicely explained….Good job….Unfortunately I did not get it to work with my X20S….All firmwares are up to date, Receiver is registered and bonded to the plane giving telemetry data, the actual lua scripts do work, but I do not get any response to any servo on the receiver….😢 Maybe you have a tip for me….Best regards and keep on the brilliant work.

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

Try this kzread.info/dash/bejne/ma6Xk7iwdbPMc6g.html

@RC-Jetprint

Жыл бұрын

Thanks mate….got it…..Self check did not work correctly…..One more question would be, if we can Switch On/Off single gyros for different flight modes….Your help would be much appreciated…❤

It's good to see Frsky finally release the receivers they should have when ACCESS first came out... you get the best of both worlds - compatibility with existing gear, and effectively future proofed. Better late than never? And maybe this should have been called a SR8+? 🤣

Hi Darren, my SR10+ receiver calibration was successfully done. However, when turning 'SRX Enable' to 'ON', it reverted back to 'OFF' immediately. The same thing happened to all items below the 'SRX Enable'. Do you have any idea why my X20S does that?

@MrD

11 ай бұрын

You need to use the specific tool for Archer Plus stabilised receivers kzread.info/dash/bejne/ma6Xk7iwdbPMc6g.html

@CertsUAsPilot

10 ай бұрын

@@MrD Placing the LUA script files in the SD card per the read me file does not work. I moved the files to an SD folder in the X20S and that fixed it. Thank you.

I have the sr10 pro and the Tandem x20s. I found that from time to time, some settings change on their own. Eg two channels used for elevator, one of which has the signal reversed so that the two servos work in unison. Every once in awhile the setting for one of the service changes back on its own (ie revered signal resets to normal signal). I am not touching anything in the transmitter- it just happens from time to time. Has anyone experienced this and if so, how do you correct this? I’m hoping this never happens when my plane is flying.

New to FRSky and Radiomaster TX16s. How would I add a satellite receiver to this new receiver. This would be for an Align Trex 550x Heli. I think it would go into Sbus..but what do you use for the satellite itself?

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

That receiver doesn’t work with the TX16S. It currently only works with genuine FrSKY transmitters.

If you have multiple planes with these stabilized receivers, do you have to adjust your gain dial when switching between models, so you would need to remember where it is for a bunch of models ? Is there a way to control the receiver gain from the transmitter without assigning a bunch of channels, if you just wanted to use it as a simple wind stabilizer for example ?

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

For each model you have the Checklist on ETHOS, and there are similar settings on the model screen in OpenTX. Once you have flown and are happy with the stabiliser pot position. You can use the checklist to remember where the pot is. That way, when you power on or switch models, it will get you to put the pot in the correct position. No need to remember, the radio will do it for you. I can make a video on this.

@wareagleA5

Жыл бұрын

@@MrD Excellent, I've even been holding off on this out of worrying about more complications, thank you!

@Steve26644

Жыл бұрын

I'm very new to FrSky, only got my X20S about 2 weeks ago but I am very experienced with setting up gyros. I find the amount of switches, knobs, pots and channels needed a bit anoying. I don't want the knife edge and hover, I agree that's cheating and with the latest firmware there is no need for a switch for self check. So I only setup channels 9 and 10, 9 on a pot, 10 on switch SG. After flying the model I then put channel 9 onto switch SG with channel 10 and set a curve to give the output I had on the pot. I also don't want self leveling so i set a curve on channel 10 to give me a damping gyro on 2 of the 3 switch positions with the other being off. The channel 9 curve can then be adjusted to give 2 different gains, 1 for high speed flight and a higher gain for slow flight or landing.

@wareagleA5

Жыл бұрын

@@Steve26644 Yeah, I also hate all the switches and pots to just get a simple wind damper. Now I've invested all this time to just get a simple wind damper for my smaller planes and they're going to discontinue their smallest gyro receiver. I'll have to look into plug in gyros now.

@Steve26644

Жыл бұрын

@@wareagleA5 I'm sure there will be an SR6 Plus soon. It makes perfect sense for them to make all the archer RX's dual protocol becuse they can then drop the x series while maintaing support for ACCST.

I'm a little late for asking this. I'm unable to "enable" the stabilization mode. When I try. It turns itself to the "off" position.

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

Make sure all the firmware is up to date. That includes the receiver and the transmitters’ operating system and RF firmware.

I do not own an Ethos radio, and bought this thinking it would connect to my Taranis. I cannot get it to connect using your instructions. IDK if it needs to be updated (firmware) or something to make the accst work? Would I update the firmware the same way I would an original S8R though the back expansion port? Thank you. Cheers.

@MrD

3 ай бұрын

Yes, I would update the firmware on the receiver. You can use the JR bay as you do for other receivers. You’d connect the SP, power, and ground. Just remember that in the JR bay Power and ground are reversed from the standard servo order. It’s also worth making sure that OpenTX and the internal RF module are on the latest firmware. Particularly the RF module as this will be using ACCST V2.

are we supposed to put a torroid on the power wires? how are we supposed to power it, by the red and black wires on the plug? you took up channel 1 for power in the video. I soldered a servo connector to the little black and red wires at first but then I just pluged the connector from the BEC into an unused channel slot. What if you want to use all the channels? how to power it?

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

Usually it’s powered by the BEC from the ESC. This is standard with LOS planes. If it’s IC, they have always needed a separate power input on a spare PWM port.

Hi Darren can you let me know how to setup hover and knife edge

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

As I mentioned in the video. I won’t be making a video on this until I have used it myself. I don’t think it’s responsible to make a video on it until then.

As a (mostly) multirotor pilot, FRSKY has lost most of its appeal to me over the last couple of years. My old foamie still has a Crossfire. But it looks really solid, this time around. Maybe, who knows, my next fixed wing model will sport one of these badboys in the future. The Transmitter looks awesome, the features are all there. Well done, Frsky. And as for your video, always a must.

Darin, thank you. This is nice to see. I do have a few questions however. Im an ACCT user. Are you able to use the SxR Lua still to config and self check etc? All provided directions are for ACCESS and ETHOS. Perhaps you could provide this feedback as well? If they are going to link to ACCT they should provide some information/support for it. Directions for ETHOS are pretty good though. 🙂 I also take it SBUS in and Channel mapping are exclusive to ACCESS? ETHOS seems slick and the transmitters/recievers have a lot of cool tech in them and seem nice. I am afraid of loosing the unlimited functionality and freedom of OPENTX by going to ETHOS. Are my fears justified?

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

To be honest, you really don’t lose much, if anything by switching from OpenTX to ETHOS these days. Especially from a Line of Sight flight perspective. The main developer of ETHOS is the guy who developed OpenTX. So he is basically making the system he could of he had started over with OpenTX. Version 1.5 will also bring more requested features such as instatrim. Of course, all ETHOS transmitters are also ACCESS, which has big benefits over ACCST. I will need to check what options are available on OpenTX. The channel mapping is likely an ACCESS feature. But you should be able to configure using the SxR LUA, as you would with an S8R for example.

@charlesmcguire9711

Жыл бұрын

Thank you again for taking the time. Cheers.

is there a way to get frsky pixl osd on the DJI goggles with this reciever ?

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

No. That won’t work at all. The closest you’ll get is WTF, as that supports all the OSD elements. But to get anything like the PixelOSD. The goggles would need to actually use a canvas OSD, rather than just saying they do.

@embededfabrication4482

Жыл бұрын

@@MrD what is wtf?

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

WTF is an alternative firmware for non-O3 DJI setups. It basically makes the system how DJI should have done it in the first place. If you look up WTFDJI or DJI WTFOS you should be able to find information on it. I’ve never used or set it up, as I don’t use DJI.

@embededfabrication4482

Жыл бұрын

@@MrD blackstar avionics has something they made up to pipe the sport data to the dji osd and also an in cockpit lcd screen

Hi Darren I have just followed the procedure for setting up SR10+, it has bound and calibrated ok but when I go to settings SxR, SXR Enable will not stay turned on? When I switch to on it stays on briefly then turns off again? How can I fix this issue please. Thanks

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

Are all firmwares up to date? There is the receiver firmware, plus the transmitter and transmitter’s RF module firmware.

@roscomonk

Жыл бұрын

@@MrD the transmitter has been recently updated via ETHOS Suite, I am using the Tx internal RF model is this also updated via ETHOS Suite? I have just received the receiver sorry I didn’t think about updating it, will do. Thanks for your reply and support, I would be at a loss without you.

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

@@roscomonk no, the transmitter’s internal RF module doesn’t get updated by ETHOS Suite currently.

@roscomonk

Жыл бұрын

Ok The transmitter was up to date on Ethos Suite. I have now updated the Tx internal RF module to latest version 2.2.4 and flashed the SR10+ to the latest version 1.0.5. However in device config SxR enable still will not stay turned on? I have another SR10+ receiver and have the same issue. I have carried out SxR calibration several times but not since the updates. Can you please help. Many thanks and appreciated

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

It looks like there is a new LUA script that needs to be installed to configure these receivers. It can be downloaded from www.frsky-rc.com/archer-plus-sr10/ The tool will appear in the system menu when the LUA script is installed.

hey so how do i get accst version 2 then ??

@MrD

Ай бұрын

Just use the latest ACCST firmware.

non of the on off sliders will stay when you use the SxR tool in the configs, if you slide them on they just slide back to off a second later? you have to enable sxr, quit then start config again.....

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

If SxR isn’t enabled, the sliders won’t do anything. I’d have thought they would have been greyed out if the SxR is disabled.

@embededfabrication4482

Жыл бұрын

@@MrD you have to load the new lua scripts for this reciever and use them. I had to re calibrate it using the new script inside the model. For some reason (using quck mode) putting it into stab mode makes my camera gimble pan (CH7) move all the way in one direction, I don't see anything in the outputs when it happens either. hmmm ?

definitely something screwy going on with this receiver when you put it into XsR automatic level mode, it makes funny outputs on other channels. I tried switching my CH7 servo that was acting funny to another pin and still doing strange things. have you set it up on a plane? we asked frsky bout it and discovered that stabilizing has to be turned off on page 2 of the Xsr menu. using CH 6,7 for the head tracker and it was doing weird things in that mode.

Great - I hate sbus on Ch 1 too

@MrD

9 ай бұрын

It looks like FrSky have listened though. They have started using last outputs rather than the first one.

They are already on Fw 1.0.5 and they haven't changed the S-Bus IN option :( quite annoying for people "like us" (OCDed I mean)

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

I did mention it. But I’m not sure if they can change that opinion, due to hardware. But they have said they would be more careful in the future.

...😜👌

I love your content; great Info and all but PLEASE trim your fingernails, thank you!

Backwards compatible eh?....It's a bit late for that FrSky, you've alienated your once faithful customer base...Dual RX's?....niche market TBH. It's a shame really, I have a number of their giro receivers the S6R...the antennas are thin and poor quality though...Looks like they've addressed that obvious problem now with sleeve Dipoles also....🤔😳😳😏🇬🇧

@MrD

Жыл бұрын

I don't get this really. They always did provide receivers for the faithful customer base. You could always buy receivers for older, ACCST transmitters. That was never an issue. This new line-up is just a new range of receivers that seamlessly support both, rather than having to buy specifically for ACCST or ACCESS. Though, a lot of ACCST receivers could also be flashed with ACCESS firmware.

@JDDupuy

Жыл бұрын

@@MrD I love how people bitch and moan about nothing. They act like they were harmed emotionally in some way. They should of been flying RC in the mid 70's, 80's and 90's. No bitching, no internet and you flew what you could buy. We were grateful for anything new that we saw in the next RC Model magazine. Folks don't know how lucky they have it today. So many choices, reliability and loads of fun!

Thanks!

@MrD

11 ай бұрын

Thank you very much Jeff👍🏻