you clearly haven't read Freud's seminal research essay "THE MOST HOTTEST MOM OF ALL TIME"

@lulula8306

3 жыл бұрын

Love your vids and articles

@JREG

3 жыл бұрын

Please stop trying to get me to rename anti-centrism to “THE LEAST CENTRIST POLITICAL IDEOLOGY OF ALL TIME” slipperdisk it’s just a mouthful

@celer2010

3 жыл бұрын

I highly recommend reading it with conjunction with a shorter piece titled "KILL YOUR FATHER BRO DO IT". Personally I'd also recommend "WHERE THE FUCK DO EELS COME FROM?" and "COKE DO YOU HAVE SOME COKE DUDE GIMME", both are pretty good reads.

@fatyoshi4853

3 жыл бұрын

@@JREG submit to it

@Grgrqr

3 жыл бұрын

Sisyphus is Jreg, but sad all of the time. Wait...

Freud gets more powerful every time someone says "mommy" or "daddy" in a sexual context

@cashkromsupernerd1193

3 жыл бұрын

Fun fact: In biblical times, brother and sister were used as romantic titles. It just migrated up a generation for Freud, I guess

@LordVader1094

3 жыл бұрын

@@cashkromsupernerd1193 Is that REALLY a fact, though? Sounds like a bullshit to me.

@thebelmont1995

3 жыл бұрын

@@LordVader1094 it's not. The greeks, Roman's, and almost every early civilization has had incest run deep in it. Even Christian monarchs would have incest to "keep bloodlines pure". This is well documented and recorded. Also worth noting, the most searched term on most pron sites is literally incest. "Step brother/sister/milf are the most popular titles in most countries.

@Rob17kLiebermann

3 жыл бұрын

Or famous porn categories like "mother/stepmother/milf"

@gonebatty7708

3 жыл бұрын

WHY DOES THIS HAVE 666 LIKES

Freud was just trying to justify his kinks scientifically.

@twicethegalo

3 жыл бұрын

Don't we all

@axmoylotl

3 жыл бұрын

That's all of research about humans

@thepastaprogenitor851

3 жыл бұрын

Animeniaks but unironically

@joec.8716

3 жыл бұрын

He had no kinks he was almost pure willpower actually

@DiMacky24

3 жыл бұрын

@J SChoosing a partner similar to your parent is likely a biological driver because the most familiar example of successful reproducers are your parents. So it would make sense a partner that emulated one of them would lead to successful reproduction.

Just imagine how hot Freud’s mom must’ve been for him to come up with the Oedipus Complex

@emkaytoo

3 жыл бұрын

Must've had some absolutely behemoth mommy milkers

@chiriviscospower

3 жыл бұрын

Ngl I had dreams involving my mom. Then again I never went more than a week without my friends teasing me about my mom's nice rear end..

@lucius42

3 жыл бұрын

@@chiriviscospower WHAT THE FUCK DID I JUST READ

@lucius42

3 жыл бұрын

@@chiriviscospower NO SERIOUSLY WHAT

@gataylor6982

3 жыл бұрын

@@lucius42 its so cursed dude

freud was right. that’s why there’s so much stepmom stuff

@nunkatsu

3 жыл бұрын

But was he authright or libright?

@enderkoregameing8090

3 жыл бұрын

The stepmom stuff is made by society to make people like stepmom stuff

@shrub8644

3 жыл бұрын

@@enderkoregameing8090 Don't click it if you're not into it

@theturboassslayer7354

3 жыл бұрын

@@shrub8644 in defense of the guy, the vast majority of the videos are about step incest, so if you're not into it you don't have many options but to bear with it

@samyrandome425

3 жыл бұрын

Little did he know I'm into stepsister stuff. Checkmate psychoanalysis.

Freud is called the Father of Psychology because if it wasn't for his wack ass ideas no one else would have decided to debunk them and actually start thinking.

@dogchaser520

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, such as the concept of the unconscious and the fact that dreams were meaningful. Just because he thought penis envy was real doesn't mean he was completely full of shit. You're being condescending.

@edit3891

3 жыл бұрын

"That can't be right, I'm going to go into this field just to prove that."

@JavanPatrickReigner

3 жыл бұрын

@@dogchaser520 Or I'm exaggerating for the joke. I wonder which one it is.

@buckplug2423

3 жыл бұрын

@@JavanPatrickReigner Ur kinda right though. It's through debunking Freud that we got Jung.

@JavanPatrickReigner

3 жыл бұрын

@@buckplug2423 Well, the truth in the joke is that Freud was wrong and people didn't like that, so different ways of thinking popped up because of how Freud thought. The exaggeration is that everything Freud said was wrong.

Stick figures and Jreg mix surprisingly well

@mathpin

3 жыл бұрын

not any stick figures, Sisyphus 55​'s stick figure, which is cool, a nice collab!

@panta_rhei.26

3 жыл бұрын

It's kinda like when they have human actors on Sesame Street

@s-tierkeyboardwarrior-lvl4686

3 жыл бұрын

based

The title was the right choice, everyone already knows that it would have been redundent

@erc8084

3 жыл бұрын

Based

@mihailmilev9909

3 жыл бұрын

@@erc8084 🅱️ased

@yourboy9236

3 жыл бұрын

Please explain me the joke

@madina404

3 жыл бұрын

@@yourboy9236 if anything else was added to the title, it wouldve been redundant information since that information was already conveyed with just "freud". No redundant info should be added, the word "freud" already explains so much

@fahimfaisal7488

3 жыл бұрын

But what about the algorithm and new viewers? Making a clickbaity title surely works right? But i guess jreg wouldn't do that as he's not necessarily trying to get more views and subscribers and is more focused on making art the way he wants it to be. All Thanks to the mighty patreons

i saw this book about freud and i opened it and it said "For my mother"

Well you see class, that was the SUBCONSCIOUS but the desire is really in your UNCONSCIOUS

@dogchaser520

3 жыл бұрын

Yep, exactly. Also, arguably no literal mother-fucking, but rather the unconscious just models the ideal partner based off of a parent (and other important, regular figures in one's life, such as siblings, aunts, uncles, grandparents and so on).

@lugus9261

3 жыл бұрын

@@dogchaser520 tru

@hamyzschidenfeld3215

3 жыл бұрын

@@dogchaser520 You didn't mention anime characters.

@dogchaser520

3 жыл бұрын

@weird internet person No, it doesn't have to be incestual in any way. Like a lot of what Freud did, he got the general bits right and then shot up some coke and geeked out on the details

@jonasastrom7422

3 жыл бұрын

@@dogchaser520 The most true statement on Freud I've seen so far

Freud did contribute a lot to psychology in the form of absolute bullshit that everyone else wanted to debunk

@dogchaser520

3 жыл бұрын

There was a lot of cocaine-fueled bullshit such as women having "penis envy," but there was a lot of good stuff there as well. The discovery of the unconscious mind and the fact that dreams have actual meaning and aren't gibberish (a controversial idea at the time that only common, low-born folk believed) were both important.

@user-tk8bk9ww9q

3 жыл бұрын

@@dogchaser520 penis envy is not that absurd either

@mariomuhammad5003

3 жыл бұрын

@@dogchaser520 Well, he wasnt very wrong about penis envy in today's world though lol, man just so much ahead of his time

@raaaaaaaaaam496

3 жыл бұрын

@@dogchaser520 the unconscious mind was around far longer than Freud.

@dogchaser520

3 жыл бұрын

@@raaaaaaaaaam496 Yes, but Freud actually fleshed it out and brought it into prominence, and derived quite a lot of conclusions from it (though some were false)

Freud also is accredited with first mentioning the defense mechanism of projection - that you believe that other people think in the same way as you

If we could map and explore a person's entire subconscious, we'd come across things so much worse than Oedipal/Electra complexes.

@ortherner

2 жыл бұрын

true

@Pensive_Scarlet

Жыл бұрын

@Witchfinder Nielsen That's just your way of coping with the deeper roots of the human urge toward immortality. You see, in order to survive, we became very good at predicting things, especially personal catastrophe. Somewhere within your mind are the imagined experiences of countless violent deaths and, with those visions, the a hidden joy at the thought of being able to completely reverse those deaths. Every time you crush an insect, there is some part of your subconscious that experiences being crushed, and takes joy in ultimately being just fine in spite of that experience. Nah, I'm just messin' with ya. ;3

So happy that Freud did not have the concept/word of 'Wincest' cause that would easily be another heavy chapter for first years to study.

@merelymayhem

3 жыл бұрын

this is so cursed yet probably true

@samgirls

3 жыл бұрын

fuck ALL romance except for whatever those brothers from supernatural had going on

@romanw8632

3 жыл бұрын

o dear god

The voices for the stick men are very calming

@edit3891

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, Jreg is getting a lot better at using different voices and convincing people they are other youtubers.

yesss more jreg x Sisyphus

@andrewprahst2529

3 жыл бұрын

These collabs have been my least favorite videos I've seen Jreg produce. I know collabs are generally hype, but can I ask why exactly you want more of this?

@andrewprahst2529

3 жыл бұрын

@astraeorium Well let me rephrase, why do you love crossovers with Sis and Jreg? I personally don't think their video styles work very well together.

@thisisbetterthanmyprevious6674

3 жыл бұрын

@@andrewprahst2529 Are you aware that two people can have different opinions?

@andrewprahst2529

3 жыл бұрын

@@thisisbetterthanmyprevious6674 I am 100% aware, that's why I am asking

@andrewprahst2529

3 жыл бұрын

@astraeorium I can definitely understand the polar opposite dynamic in theory, and I imagine they must see something in each other since they keep collaborating. The way I see it, this is worse for both of them. Jreg has historically succeeded because of the subversion of expectation, irony, and otherwise unusual style of videos. This kind of video brings him down to irony level 0, and he doesn't really have any new spin on this done-to-death subject Sisyphus thrives in an environment where he could cite studies and explain things in depth. This kind of short video stops him from being able to do that. His statement "we have brainscans that don't show that" may be true, but presenting it in this format as if it were common knowledge just comes off as arrogant to me. I'm not saying a collaboration between them could never work, but the way it stands makes me want to tear my eyes out.

freud created a whole psychological area of study just because he had mommy issues

@conquestv4024

3 жыл бұрын

Oh definitely the man did alot of contribution to the field of psychology like super ego.

@richardmeunster8743

3 жыл бұрын

He created psychology to justify his fetish

@Nobody-Nowhere

3 жыл бұрын

@@conquestv4024 Isn't it funny, that the superego forms as a result of the oedipus complex? :) BUt there you go, saying that superego is fine but oedipus complex is not :)

@Vihara2

3 жыл бұрын

@@conquestv4024 he created alot of contributions to psychology by saying really tapped out shìt and getting psycho analysed by his peers who werent crazy lmao

@RonJeremy514

3 жыл бұрын

He didn't create psychology, his field is psychoanalysis at best. Real experimental psychology came up with pretty cool crowd reaction studies, Skinner Box mechanism, and also things like people having fears over things that would happen in the future than more pressing matters in the present. Psychoanalysis is just bullshit like astrology.

I like how it could be “psyc 101” or “psyc lol” on the board behind him 😂

@masicbemester

3 жыл бұрын

both

@gwentarinokripperinolkjdsf683

3 жыл бұрын

@@masicbemester centrist

@masicbemester

3 жыл бұрын

@@gwentarinokripperinolkjdsf683 nope, I actually picked both extremes at once

@shawerful5209

3 жыл бұрын

@plane "you are strong and wise and i am very proud of you"

*Freud reads Oedipous once* "I can make a career out of this"

"Lol can't believe Freud actally believed that. Anyways I'm off to make mommy gf memes" *closes jreg vid*

@connorschrock2883

3 жыл бұрын

I hate that this comment literally made me stop in my tracks and have a crisis for a good 5 minutes

learning about freud is just everyone shitting on how freud is wrong and his lack of practical research but then everyone ultimately going back to him.

@100acatfishandwillbreakyou2

3 жыл бұрын

"Freud was wrong and unscientific." And? "Iunno."

Thank god Freud walked around with a big cardboard sign on his head saying "Freud", otherwise no one would've known it was the man

Once again a million comments from people who have never read freud. The oedipus thing is a phase before puberty that is then repressed. Who ever looks honestly at his or her childhood will (with shame) remember competition with one parent for attention from the parent of opposite sex. If there is a problem in the process of repression neurosis or hysteria can occur later in life. That is basically what freud was getting at. Not that YOU a grown ass man wants to do your own mother. I actually really dislike it when people discredit somebody without having engaged with the source material.

live-footage of carl jung's last conversation with freud

Freud was a good kickstarter for tge science, but his ideas have been improved since. Fortunatly

>When you realize that most of Freud's clients were from rich, powerful families and they had issues because of childhood sexual abuse but he had to write it off somehow

@OsirusHandle

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah he totally didnt come to this conclusion very very quickly and write about sexual abuse in dozens of papers... nope, didnt do that, totally...

@aperson5436

3 жыл бұрын

Thats a very anti-semitic take right there...

@sean668

3 жыл бұрын

@@aperson5436 What

@OsirusHandle

3 жыл бұрын

@Jasta 2 This is nonsense. Freud doesnt use the terms neurosis nor repression in the way you imply he does (he doesnt use supression at all?). Freud considered himself a scientist who was investigating the structure of the psyche, he didnt try to "subvert" anything intentionally. Hell, his entire oedipal theory is criticised primarily by feminists as being heteronormative and patriarchal in nature. This "perversity" you describe is much more easily shown simply by statistics and empirical evidence...

@adolfhipsteryolocaust3443

2 жыл бұрын

@@OsirusHandle freud considerd himself a jew trying to destroy the gentiles, simple as that

He did contribute to the creation of some banger memes, though.

It's not that you want to have sex with your parents, it's that you are very likely to seek out a partner that has similar characteristics to your parent of the opposite sex (for straight ppl). A child's model of what a good partner looks like, what love feels like, etc is formed very early on, even in the years we don't remember. Freud was right on a lot of stuff, we just use more accurate language these days to describe these concepts. But Freud introduced the concepts. IRL what this looks like is: a female with an abusive dad later on seeks out abusive male partners. A male with a nurturing mother later seeks out very empathetic female partners. A female with a strong and stable dad later seeks out those characteristics in male partners. Etc.

@zey1966

3 жыл бұрын

I think that’s more aligned with Bowlby’s attachment theory than Freud’s Oedipus/Electra complex tho

The only thing Freud did for modern psychology is piss everyone off enough it became something to study

@onioncrusader2191

3 жыл бұрын

Bitch he invented the subconscious read something lol

The worst part is that this wasn’t his original theory, his original work, “The Aetiology of Hysteria”, should be able to be accessed still and it talked about child sexual violence being linked to mental disorders in adults, but due to academic pushback he opted for more... misogynistic theories in the future, to justify all the incestuous rape

Nobody is talking about the line "I have a representation of my subconsciousness... On this USB file."

he thought that parents acted as sexual rolemodels for children and when you had a bad childhood often the affect would be misbalances to this end that bubbled as neuroses. honestly it's not that bad of a theory and considering he was one of the only people on the planet at the time that thought you could actually treat a person's illness merely by talking them (something we totally take for granted now) it's sort of lame that we focus purely on his faults

@DustyHoney

3 жыл бұрын

Nah he was pretty stupid. Having a shitty childhood might make your sexuality weird but lots of traumatic events can have that effect.

@dr.suffuzz6383

3 жыл бұрын

it’s cool to mention how he was a pioneer but it’s frightening to see how much he’s talked about in psychology textbooks. his ideas about childhood sexual abuse were really shitty. the whole reason why he says kids lust after their parents is because he thought all mental illness stemmed from csa and he didn’t believe some of his patients when they said they were abused. he said that their memories of abuse were just fantasies instead of things that actually happened to them

@OsirusHandle

3 жыл бұрын

@@dr.suffuzz6383 He stuck with a theory that many of his patients were abused even if they didnt admit so, but on the case i think you are referencing, he believed the girl was fantasizing abuse in order to repress another fantasy over someone else. He didnt rly write people off but he did question whether or not their claims could be taken at face value.

I kept expecting him to flip the freud sign around and have it read "fraud"

step freud i'm stuck

I dunno Freud might be on to something. almost every woman I dated had elements of my mother's personality

@SwanTeeth

3 жыл бұрын

That doesn't mean an innate attraction necessarily. We tend to have an easier time interacting with the familiar i.e you know how to interact with someone who has a personality of someone you know. For example its easy to interact with a friend who reminds you of your cousin/brother. Commonalities are a starting point.

@AdolfStalin

3 жыл бұрын

@@SwanTeeth that makes sense why as a Fashy dude I have trouble making friends here in the states.

We legit talked about incest porn in ap gov. Cause our teacher was like media makes u subconsciously want to do said thing depicted in said media, I was like one of the largest points category for Americans is incest. So is a large amount of Americans into incest. He said he doesn't know and doesn't want to know.

@mihailmilev9909

3 жыл бұрын

lmao

@gavinlee6196

3 жыл бұрын

@@mihailmilev9909 dude was trying to convince us video game cause violence

@davidbaptist96

3 жыл бұрын

My two cents about this topic: maybe the narrative fiction of erotic materials does act more as "contextualisation" to make it more "belivable"/enjoyable for the watcher, rather than it being the object of desire in itself. So for istance for the "incest" catgory I'd say that it could be a way to sell a story in which a dude lives in close contact with an insanely hot girl/woman and manages to have sex with her. And considering that a huge amount of said content involves step-parents/step-sibilings, I would suspect that most watchers aren't directly interested in incest, but more simply in having sex with hot women. And the story of "your mom/dad remarried and now you have to live with a super hot step-sister" is something they can emphatise with.

@gavinlee6196

3 жыл бұрын

@@davidbaptist96 to be fair, porn within the US are legally obligated to have a plot. I guess great writers think alike lol

@OmbreDunDouble

3 жыл бұрын

@@davidbaptist96 I agree with your point, partly, but can't we say that the oedipus complex revolve around the same context ?

Tfw you can’t find eel balls.

They clearly didnt have hot enough parents .

Got this notif while working on a cognitive science presentation and it scared me... and then I watched the video and I got even more scared... But then I realized that we literally don't even know how our brains organize semantic categories like "fruit" and "bird" yet, so the idea that we will ever be able to map our consciousness and put it on a USB drive is just kind of adorably naive... We Know Nothing About Our Brains And Minds And We Never Will

@Nobody-Nowhere

3 жыл бұрын

You can know a lot about your brain, but studying your mind as a whole nother thing. Its not like you can scan fantasies. Robert Stoller put it kinda interestingly, that science need to catch up with psychoanalysis. As its the study of the mind, not the brain. And we have no tools to study the mind, only the brain.

@fiona8081

3 жыл бұрын

@@Nobody-Nowhere not that pesky mind-body problem again! curse you, Descartes! my work would be a lot easier if only I could blindly buy into his pineal gland conjecture... [on a serious note, that's really one of the major questions being explored in cognitive psych, proposing empirical ways of getting at aspects of the hard problem of consciousness. recommend reading Lisa Feldman Barrett's "The Future of Psychology: Connecting Mind to Brain" if you are interested in scientific ontology, I think it's a quite well-written take on the issue. Personally, I'm in the clinical field but my research focuses on cognitive models of pathological processes]

@user-tk8bk9ww9q

3 жыл бұрын

And to add more on that, mapping the unconscious through empirical observation applied to the brain will never be possibile, since the freudian unconscious has nothing to do with the brain.

@fiona8081

3 жыл бұрын

​@@user-tk8bk9ww9q Well, I mean, I'm sure we could debate that assumption, but as of yet I'd say it's not clear one way or the other. Personally, based on my theoretical orientation framework, I'm inclined to partially agree with you, but that's kind of the question, is there a mind-brain connection or not, and if there is, how does it work? Who are we to rule out the metaphysical, but also the metaphysical cannot be ruled *in*, either... And what does the Freudian unconscious even refer to, specifically? Do you have a conscious mind and an unconscious mind and a brain? How are they differentially related to one another? And as with many things in life, it all depends on how you want to define and categorize constructs... Anyway, this is usually the point when my thesis advisor would stop me and say "we are in a psychology program, not a philosophy program, so let's not get into an existential spiral about questions we can't hope to answer"

@user-tk8bk9ww9q

3 жыл бұрын

@@fiona8081 I wrote a huge comment but it got cancelled. Anyway, you got the right point. I would frame it like this: the unconscious makes jokes. This is evident in the clinical cases of the h0mosexual woman and the rat man. In these cases the unconscious organizes the symptoms on the basis of a joke that is interpreted by the analyst, and Is unknown to the patient. The point is, why does it make jokes? Probably because it is a way to "mask" the trauma to the subject. But it still Is mysterious. Anyway we come to the mind body problem: they seem to be connected by the unconscious through language. Language Is important because It Is the thing that allows these jokes to happen, via which the trauma is turned into a joke, using metaphors and methonymies (i must have spelled some words wrong, I'm italian). Anyway this stuff is very complicated, It was described in detail by Lacan, Who loved to call himself the only successor of Freud. If you want I can suggest you some books.

The intellectual relevance of Freud is one of history's most absurd phenomena

@mihailmilev9909

3 жыл бұрын

Interesting

@mihailmilev9909

3 жыл бұрын

@Love Law oh yeah like the Bible

don't worry he didn't contribute to psychology like at all

@JREG

3 жыл бұрын

Yes that’s what I figured hahah silly Freud you see I actually do my research unlike some you tubers

@sebastianlisiak5071

3 жыл бұрын

@@JREG good job Jrug we are proud of you

@ethanreichard4658

3 жыл бұрын

@@JREG Great point! You really showed those idiotic non-researched youtubers who’s boss!

@ne0nn3on

3 жыл бұрын

@@JREG he actually did do something for psychology. He helped popularise it, mainly by sprouting so many dumb ideas that people with common sense went out of their way to specifically disprove him which ended up created a lot of the modern foundations of psychology.

@fiona8081

3 жыл бұрын

@@ne0nn3on So true, forever grateful to Freud for pissing so many actual scientists off that they just had to create the entire field of cognitive psychology to disprove him.

I feel like I have the "fuck freud" conversation with someone at least once a week... Subconscious, ego, and id (and the resulting iceberg analogies) stuff wasn't bad though

@dogchaser520

3 жыл бұрын

It's pretty cliche. People have been saying Fuck Freud for decades. He had some dumb ideas and some good ones. Don't say fuck you to the good ideas. Let's move on.

@roboticle117

3 жыл бұрын

Jung is way cooler

@JagenRay

3 жыл бұрын

@@roboticle117 precisely; although he has to be approached with an irrealist mindset

@neinei9908

3 жыл бұрын

@@roboticle117 Lacan?

@roboticle117

3 жыл бұрын

@@JagenRay indeed, some people have to learn metaphysics

Ah yes, my favourite combo, syphilis and George.

Note: Freud mentioned the UNCONSCIOUS, not the subconscious. Different things

Freud was projecting

@mihailmilev9909

3 жыл бұрын

Lol

Wow Jreg, you really showed those Freuds who's boss!

@c.alexander4199

3 жыл бұрын

How did you do that? Get that thing out of here

@lysergidedaydream5970

3 жыл бұрын

@@c.alexander4199 UCzC5CNksIBaiT-NdMJjJNOQ/COLRg9qOwdQCFce-qgodrbsLaA well. That did not work.

@r_se

3 жыл бұрын

@@c.alexander4199 : awesome : without spaces

@sheevpalprotein9132

3 жыл бұрын

@@c.alexander4199 no. We're going back to 2006 and nothing can stop it. Also yeah, : awesome : without spaces

@sigriddolan8583

3 жыл бұрын

We love to see the Sisyphus55 collabs

I haven't read freud either, but i watched a video essay about him and how he was wrong about everything. So yeah.

@OsirusHandle

3 жыл бұрын

big brained

Oh God mom....He is doing it again.

Basically Freud and Jung's relationship ending

Whenever I think of Sigmund Freud all I can I think about is that one Sam O’Nella video that got taken down.

Nobody who has an opinion on freud actually read him, like with most things people have an opinion about

@EZVideoStore

3 жыл бұрын

ya, they just take what the most general opinion on him is then spread it around themselves.

@ceruchi2084

3 жыл бұрын

Almost as bad as Neetchee.

@OsirusHandle

3 жыл бұрын

This exactly. Its really obvious too when you look for specific phrases. Lot of people repeating the same joke that he was just "projecting his kinks"... ironic.

@raaaaaaaaaam496

3 жыл бұрын

@@OsirusHandle he’s been debunked throughly

@Legitimate123

3 жыл бұрын

@@raaaaaaaaaam496 Yeah bro, he's been 'fact checked' haha, gottem. 'Debunk' that guy. No. A lot of how we understand about consciousness and how humans work mentally because of Freud's work. Not because he was dumb and 'real scientists' 'debunked' him, but because there was underlying truths that we weren't aware of before Freud, that we now take as granted and don't credit him for.

My favourite psychology class

I love that I watched both of them separately and that I saw the process of them making content together

I really liked this format, id be interested in seeing more collaboration content from you Jregory

This is exactly the kind of failed-to-understand-the-source-text-but-still-made-a-sketch, -even-though-a-large-part-of-the-audience-will-think-it's-accurate, ironic humour I love about you Jreg

Freud did contribute a lot to it. By giving us wrong answers so we could come to right answers. I can't think of any of Freud's ideas have ever been shown to be accurate to a large degree.

Two of my favourite small channels coming together, love it

i would believe this but couples on tiktok have convinced me otherwise. freud was right

A crossover I never expected, but one that seems so right

@mihailmilev9909

3 жыл бұрын

For real

@mihailmilev9909

3 жыл бұрын

Ikr

Freud was basically "I'm not the only one, right guys?"

Loving these collabs

this is no longer the case but wen I clicked on this video 50% of the people who watched it commented.

I loved the vid, though there is a distinction between psychology (a scientific discipline) and psychoanalysis (which is widely considered as a therapeutic technique or a philosophic lens and not a science). Freud isn't the founder of psychology (which preceded him), he just came up with psychoanalysis. Sending love

@mihailmilev9909

3 жыл бұрын

mmmhmmm, ok thank you. So how would you reccomend someone start on either? Or where is, or where could I find the information for either?

@HackSlashStudios

3 жыл бұрын

There's a lot of historical/doctrinal debate out there as to whether or not psychology is a "science" and exactly what kind of science it is. Further, I don't think your characterization of psychoanalysis as separate from psychology is historically accurate as all understandings of the concepts of subconscious and cognitive psychology fundamentally stem from Freud. Before Freud the people who wanted psychology to be a true "science" were people like Titchener, who I can't believe doesn't get more hate because he was way whackier than Freud.

So i sense a bit of defensive postures in the comment section. I wonder what Freud would say about that.

The collab i didn't think i needed, but am forever grateful to have seen

Weird to see it saying "9 seconds ago"

it's all in the _mind_

Turns out that freud was PROJECTING the whole time. Please clap.

@edit3891

3 жыл бұрын

*clap*

@JohnSmith-sh2gv

3 жыл бұрын

@@edit3891 thanks

Didn't even read the description and I already know who is the guest. A surprise indeed but a welcomed one.

Mapped out the subconscious! Wish that was a thing!

As someone who has read Freud I can say with confidence the man was FULL OF SHIT AND GOT LUCKY! The main reason he gets credit is for being the first person to recognise that events from your childhood affect the way you act as an adult. Pretty much everything else he hypothesized has been proven false.

Freud's work has really had influence on classical culture to this date. One of the greatest pieces following his in-depth research along with the ideas he's disseminated is "MILF gets wrecked by step-son BWC". Truly brilliant stuff

No body mentioned how that one student MAPPED OUT THE ENTIRE SUBCONSCIOUS AND PUT IT ON A USB FILE

this is a great video jreg thank you so much for making it

Freud actually wouldn't accept your evidence and paint sisyphus55 as a self destructive person in denial

Freud is just trying to scientifically justify his kinks

@aaronlandry3934

3 жыл бұрын

“scientifically” Freud basically just said “Hmm, I think this is correct and I’m the only Psychologist around, so I say it is right.”

Thank God this video isn't titled "THE MOST INCESTOUS PHILOSOPHER OF ALL TIME", I would have never clicked on a video with a title like that

thank you jreg for introducing me to sisyphus. honestly beautiful

Freud also creating the Electra complex because he wants to see some action between him, his wife, and his daughter

@mihailmilev9909

3 жыл бұрын

Lol

@EcclesiastesLiker-py5ts

3 жыл бұрын

That guy was wack.

@Nobody-Nowhere

3 жыл бұрын

Electra complex was Jungs creation.

@EZVideoStore

3 жыл бұрын

@@Nobody-Nowhere and Freud rejected that term, saying that girls had the same complex but in the form of penis envy rather than castration anxiety. just read this on the Wikipedia about the Oedipus complex

@sipheselassie4634

3 жыл бұрын

@@Nobody-Nowhere right lol, the fact that Jung continued Freud's work makes it even worse. But I thought Freud came up with the original idea and then Jung officially coined it the Electra complex

Freud, you don’t have to go so far to justify wanting mommy gf. You’ve drawn some ridiculous and nonsensical conclusions when all we want is mommy gf. It stops there.

I love Sisyphus's channel so much

I was literally just on ur subreddit and u uploaded. Neat

Another banger Jreg!

Your German accent is so convincing omg

Whaaaat ? You're telling me psychology is not a real science and totally unreliable ? Noooooo waaaaay!

What an unusual example of the defense mechanism, projection.

Freud is like the fantasy genre of psychological research

I was just about to say "If freud is wrong, explain the front page of pornhub" then the last two seconds of the video happened

As long as you think of desire as something located in the brain you will never understand the point of psychoanalysis

He really pulled off Freud's signature sign

Really showed those modern Psychologists Jreg

amazing Austrian accent mr jreg

holy shit sisyphis and jreg in the same video. i could start a religion outta this

The most iconic crossover of all time

Do not let this propagnd distract you from the fact that Freud would probably like anime mommy milkies.

@mihailmilev9909

3 жыл бұрын

For sure

@masicbemester

3 жыл бұрын

definitely

@AlexanderMartinez-kd7cz

3 жыл бұрын

But when we do it we're weebs e.e

Yummy

@MeMe-kt2kb

3 жыл бұрын

Indeed

@bolenco149

3 жыл бұрын

lmao

@rbunebula_1551

3 жыл бұрын

True 🤤

@millicentuwu1977

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah you got that yummy yummy 😳

@osomister

3 жыл бұрын

Very yummy

That disclaimer was excellent.

Upping those produtction values with animation, I see

Jreg