Creative expression takes many forms. As a trained realistic painter I have moved over the years to only creating work of marks, texture and colour. I find abstract art much more challenging. I can no longer paint people or things anymore. If I see something in my work that resembles either I quickly destroy it. I love this artists process.

@ivandariocardonaramirez1494

2 жыл бұрын

Buenas noches, saludos, te quería preguntar si lo sabes, la forma como se fijan los pigmentos.

@terrysteichen873

Жыл бұрын

It's exactly the same with me

This is marvellous. Congratulations to the artist.

❤❤❤

Très bonne artiste qui vie de sa passion j adore ça sa se voit dans ses gestes il est passionné

@baboucheyt5321

4 жыл бұрын

Maskyng de mes couilles bouge de la

J'aime beaucoup toutes les textures et la danse de son geste sur le tableau magnifique

Beautiful work

Très beau artiste

Wow very nice👌👌👌👌🤗🥰

Excellent

Great!

I like this anf i lov it

Maravilloso!

Whaoo !! 🤩+ 1 like.

Yellow pigment powder over black oil paint ,is that correct❤???

tHANK YOU Made my day Non verbal poetry , Would like to see these surfaces up close . Am unsure of the medium or pigments , oil gauche tempura or other hybrid medium .

Bonjour J’admire beaucoup ce que vous faites et j’aimerais vous poser quelques questions si possible. J’aimerais savoir quel solvant utilisez vous pour faire tenir les poudres? Est-ce bien de la peinture à l’huile ? Merci de votre retour ❤️❤️❤️

He’s good .

👏👏👏👏👏

How's he getting it to stay on and not mix with other pigments under ????

Quiero saber los materiales que usa

Incroyablement beau ce que vous creez la. Sont ces pigments purs qu'ils tachent la-bas? Comment les pigments collemt les pigments collent-ils ?

what is this he is using? encaustic or pigment powder?

Un atelier qui fait penser à la caverne d'Ali Baba. Yves Frémin, peintre à Plouézec (Côtes d'Armor) kzread.info/dash/bejne/lamYmpN_prDKYLw.html

It’s so easy for you to praise but so hard for me to appreciate. I become more and more fed up with these so called artists who don’t show any skill based merit or discipline in their works but just some myriad rainbow effects of meaningless abstraction. You are painting without a clear mental acumen about what you are doing, you are writing without any aesthetic quality of calligraphy, are you painting or writing an artwork? You play a joke with the audience some of who may have a high taste of art. Some of the contemporary art works are just junks in the long run and their final destination is the waste incinerator no matter how astronomical figures of currency they are realized in the auction markets. The Big Rich manipulates the market to make the garbage like paintings priceless in the purpose to distort the aesthetic judgment of the general public whom they think the human minds can be transformed to serve their interests untold either political or commercial. Never think that the multitude of people don’t know what good art is, never try to gain a reputation by blurring the intelligent mind. Leonardo da Vinci or the likewise great names will carry with them glory and pride in eternity, but Some names like this paint powder spreader action painter will become a laughingstock finally.

@markborder906

3 жыл бұрын

Some art is primarily intellectual, some primarily emotional. This work is the latter. You either “get it” or you don’t. Many, including me, do.

@markborder906

3 жыл бұрын

@Philip Gomez Did you miss the word “primarily “? Of course geometric shapes can convey emotion, have you never looked at a Rothko?

@markborder906

2 жыл бұрын

@Philip Gomez I agree that emotions are by-products of our minds, in the sense that the brain causes the release of chemicals that cause us to “feel” emotion. However, I do not agree with your interpretive explanation. That might be the case for you, but it is not the case for everyone else. I suspect you are miss understanding my use of “primary” and “secondary” here. I am using them in the sense of major and lesser. Or more important and less important, in each case. When I stand in front of a major Rothko - say those in the Tate. I do not interpret anything. I allow my emotional response to them take over. Later I may move closer to examine how he achieved the effects to see if there are things I can learn and use in my own paintings. But, initially, I do all I can to avoid any preconceptions, ideas, interpretations etc as I look at them. Fortunately they are powerful enough to overcome anything I might bring. The best art is. Even, what almost the definition of a “chocolate box” decorative painting - Constable’s “The Haywain”, when actually stood in front of, has enough power to overcome all the crap, tiny reproductions, tea towels and jigsaw puzzles etc., one has seen. It’s decorativeness is overridden by its emotional power. Then one can start to look at it intellectually and, in my case, technically. Cubism, on the other hand, is normally an intellectual response predominantly, although when, as a child I first saw a slide of (admittedly not pure cubist, but related) Duchamp’s “Nude Descending a Staircase” my reaction was the emotions of wonder and excitement at something utterly new and amazing to me.

@La_La_Land_

2 жыл бұрын

I agree with you 100%. Especially, on what you said about the Big Rich. They themselves do not collect the garbage they're pushing down our throats, they collect real Art. As to those "millions" paid for the pieces of faeces at the auctions, those are either scams and make beliefs played thru' the Art mafia, or some Russian or Chinese nouveau-riches who are swindled out of their $$$. I've come across quite a few complaints of the Russian new rich who say when they buy art it costs millions and comes with the promises of appreciation in value but when they want to sell it, miraculously, no one wants to pay even half the price. That's when they realize that the joke was on them.

@La_La_Land_

2 жыл бұрын

@@markborder906 "Getting it" or not getting it is not the point. When I watch a child or a kid playing with colors or mixing some paints, I enjoy it emotionally together with them. Sometimes, I do the same and enjoy it as a kid would. But presenting that as Fine Art with a price tag attached to it IS quackery! There're zillions of things and phenomena that we emotionally respond to - should we consider them all 'Art'? Would you trust your body to someone who claims to be a surgeon but never bothered to acquire the skills? Why would we call someone a Fine Artist if he/she can only draw like an art school student - and, that's at best?

Маляр, штукатур.