Frank Turek you are a blessed brilliant man may God bless you.

@derekardito2032

Жыл бұрын

He is an ignoramous con man spiv that preaches and makes his living off conning the already indoctrinated , outside of that circle he is nothing but a figure of ridicule.

Wonderful presentation! EVERY Christian should read his book, "I don't have enough faith..."

@LatrineDerriere

4 ай бұрын

It's so bad

My Dad and Brother are Marines! We lost my Brother! I have to believe he’s with God ! And yes both are tough guys ! Lol God bless 🙏🏻

@dt7491

4 жыл бұрын

@Darth Quantum you've become what you hate

@mattk6719

4 жыл бұрын

Semper Fidelis

@luxandhonor5101

3 жыл бұрын

Please accept my condolences for your loss.

@josephkelley8246

3 жыл бұрын

GOD bless ýòur brother I'm betting he's with Jesus

@evenruderanger7617

3 жыл бұрын

@@dt7491 haha yes he is doing EXACTLY what he says he doesn't like! And accusing Frank of lecturing him about science in his school... First off Frank is in a church, and secondly I bet he has a different standard for Christians speaking at colleges vs anyone else spewing baseless theories at his college. He is probably fine with the baseless theories but against a reasoned defense of the faith supported by the science!

Great presentation! Dr. Turek is one of the best (if not the best) presenters for Christian apologetics on the "common men" level. Great quality of videotaping too! Thank you! 🙏🌹

@evenruderanger7617

3 жыл бұрын

He glorifies God with all the evidence! Problem is, evidence edifies believers, but not necessarily unbelievers! People who ask for evidence would deny Jesus if he was in front of them! Because the OVERWHELMING evidence already exists but they still deny. I showed my Mormon parents the evidence for the Bible compared to the Book of Mormon. Even they, who say they believe in the Bible, deny the evidence for it! How will you convince someone who denies the Bible outright? I don't think evidence changes minds often. If it does, it's probably because God already changed their heart enough to honestly consider the evidence.

@RamonScott777

2 жыл бұрын

@@evenruderanger7617 well yeah it depends on the person, as Frank states whether you choose to believe something or not it doesn't change if it is true. Frank said before also what he is saying isn't to fully convince someone but to be like a stone in your shoe.

Never loses it's relevance, no matter how much time passes.

I actually understood this video ❤️❤️❤️ I tried to read some philosophical apologetics books but they left me a bit confused since English is not my native language, its hard to understand philosophy books if you don’t read them in your native language.

@jonathanturek5846

2 жыл бұрын

Glad you found the debate lecture that goes on here ! Welcome Friend

Amazing presentation. Thank you so much Dr. Turek!

Thank you for this teaching

Outstanding and Beautiful Brother Frank Turek. God bless you and Brother Kent Hovind for Explaining the Faith and Bible so Good. And debunking every Atheist. Heartly Greetings and Marry Christmas Days .

This guy came to our church and preached this. Fantastic it was a thrill

@goofyskittles

3 жыл бұрын

Which church?

Great Teacher 💪

Thanks a mil KT ! Awesome taste ! Will be watching ! All the Very Best . Happy Easter !

33:23 Imagine sitting there in the seats next to the girl who friend zoned you while Frank says that. OOOOOOFF

@salamatusuleimandauda6750

3 жыл бұрын

This is enlightening. God bless your efforts IJN

This is really good and teaching me something. Thank you Dr

The bit at 34:00 is profound. God pursues - but people say 'my will be done'.

Enjoy Frank's teaching 🤠😎😁

thanks Dr. Turek

🤣🤣🤣 “What are you sinking about?”

Love his videos 👍🏾👏🏾

@selfrespectingfemale6811

5 жыл бұрын

🖐🏾✌🏾

God bless your sons ! 🇺🇸

From my experience with atheists I agree with Frank , the bottom issue with why they will not accept Christ and it's morality .

@drumrnva

5 жыл бұрын

Really? You should read more. Non believers ask hundreds of salient questions.

@edreview4981

5 жыл бұрын

@@drumrnva Such as?

@drumrnva

5 жыл бұрын

@@edreview4981 Define your God, without reference to some religious texts. How do you demonstrate that your particular God has made a revelation to humanity? How would you demonstrate with confidence that Humanity has understood that revelation? How is your god, or your experience of the supernatural, falsifiable?

@edreview4981

5 жыл бұрын

​@@drumrnva Your questions are predicated on certain false presuppositions/claims. Your questions presume both a lack of authoritativeness of Christian Scripture and apparently also a lack of a falsifiabilty requirement for a certain proposed principle of falsifiabilty itself. You may also be under-appreciating the importance of history as a source of truth in determining the validly of competing worldviews. In addition, you may also be unmindful of the fact that you and everyone else holds to a faith-based worldview.

@drumrnva

5 жыл бұрын

@@edreview4981 I don't mean to put you in an untenable position. I really would like to have responses. I find it very frustrating that when someone says God, I don't know what they are talking about. Hence a need for definition and demonstration. *On what basis would I assume authoritativeness of scripture? *So since falsifiability doesn't apply to itself, shall we dispense with it? I thought scientific epistemology had produced some practical benefits for humanity? *"History as a source of truth"? Can you be more specific? *I've got no problem copping to a faith-based worldview. I fully expect things to be observable and measurable tomorrow too. So far so good. I will not accept that my faith-based view is equivalent to the faith-based view of a theist, however. I don't think you exposed anything, Edreview. I just asked a few questions, which are not based on some moral disagreement.

You watch enough frank Turek & Greg Koukl, you notice they use the same jokes. 😂

Amen brotha thanks for Frank Turkey 🙏.

@disciplesf4287

2 жыл бұрын

🦃

@AlejandroRodriguez-ye6li

11 ай бұрын

Turek

Now that's how present the apologetic

We don’t teach our young ones that we are at war (Spiritual war ) and some of us don’t think we in a war The battle is already won but we can’t battle alone we need the holy spirit

19:37 When Turek mentions the name Dr. Sam Solomon, is he mentioning the ex-Muslim? The Sam Solomon I am referring to had videos on apologetics as well.

Frank I do enjoy watching your presentations; agreeing with almost everything you have to say ….. With one exception and that involves your reference to faith? Though at one point you did speak to faith; starting at 29 min. you explained there is belief that, and belief in? However, if examined I think in your view of faith these are in fact one in the same; from the same source …. an argument? You don’t differentiate you don’t explain why a belief in? Scripture speaks of faith, biblical faith, as being a gift from God, its not an inside job? Most Christians will agree that God is ever present? That God is powerful? That God is loving? A Father? But ask them, has He ever spoken to you? Has He ever told you He loves you? Do you have conversations with Him; after all He’s a Person, and all persons with whom we are in relationships, we engage in conversations? That’s how we know we can truly trust them? By getting to know them? The fact about faith that should be apparent is that knowing about, is not the same as knowing. There is nothing wrong with knowing about God; the more the better, but that isn’t faith and it won’t save you. I have heard you speak of the daughter that stopped believing in God, and I would agree that had she had better arguments, she might have held out longer; perhaps even persuaded a few to her side? But that is not actually Christianity? Had she ever encountered God as a reality in her life nothing; not even the threat of death could have taken that away from her. That is faith, that is what changes us, that is what begins our walk into salvation. The bible is great; the word of God. In 2 Timothy 3:16-17 we read ….. All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness. That the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work. NOTE: we don’t read scripture saves? Or that it 's useful in that pursuit? But it seams to me that most often people try to make it useful in that way? As Christians the one common aspect of all is a relationship with God through Yashua, but most it seems to me don’t actually have a relationship? What I see they have is an intellectual conviction, a deeply held belief in Gods existence? A knowledge of him; provided in great part through a study of scripter? Somewhat like a person reading an auto biography and falling in love with the person for whom it's written? Would we call that love genuine? Finally, Romans 10:17 holds that faith come by this manner? So then faith comes????? If so, then how? After all, without faith we are certainly lost…. For by grace are you saved THROUGH FAITH and this not of works lest any should boast it is a GIFT from God? So again, I say tell me of this faith; of this gift from God? Of all the things I most need to know this is primary???? The most popular view of Romans 10:17 is that faith is imparted by the word of God, and that word is found in scripture???? I say that is an incorrect view of the passage based on a bad translation. Here is the passage in Greek and its normal translation to English. ἄρα ἡ πίστις ἐξ ἀκοῆς, ἡ δὲ ἀκοὴ διὰ ῥήματος Χριστοῦ. So faith from hearing - and hearing through (the) word of Christ. This is a poor translation because Greek has more than a single term translated word in English; ῥήματος (rhēmatos) and λόγος (logos). One can be a reference to scripture the other can't. When Paul wrote concerning the Gift of faith from God, he used the Greek term ῥήματος (rhēmatos). This is a spoken word? He is saying faith is received at encountering God person to person? That is unless it's possible to have a conversation in so other way?

Geisler 2.0😂 Funnier and friendlier❤️👍🏻👏🏻

One of the oldest scams is to collect tithe by telling people that they're born in sin & there's a better place after death, but to be saved a spot they must repent & believe the story that a lord & savior was sacrificed 2000 years ago to forgive their sins.

Hi my name is kershwin a youth pastor from south Africa I just wanted to know Is there resources available so that I may use to teach others?

If truth didn't exist nothing could answered and why question anything

Truth has a name JESUS CHRIST the way the truth and the life

So whats the point of hell? What purpose does it serve to last eternally?

Truth is dependable, testable and reliable. It is not based on faith.

Hey can someone please.explain the Homer Simpson joke @ the 50 min mark. Please!

@jonathanwilliams2320

4 жыл бұрын

Prerry sure the joke is just that he doesn't understand because he's dumb

No truth sounds like insanity.

Wow...that was a tough room. must be British reserve

I have only one objection to your argument Dr. Truek. How do you come to the conclusion that being in the Airforce is smarter than being in the Navy???

@joshuaread6838

4 жыл бұрын

Easier basic, better defacs, better living conditions, etc........

@paulaycock896

Жыл бұрын

There's a reason we nicknamed it the chair force. SEMPER FI

STARTS @ 8:00

JESUS LOVES YOU EVEN WHEN YOU DON'T LOVE HIM.

@anonomiss6096

4 жыл бұрын

No he loves you just get it in writing

@cperez8203

4 жыл бұрын

Psalms 5:4-5 For You are not a God who takes pleasure in wickedness, Nor shall evil dwell with You. The boastful shall not stand in Your sight; You hate all workers of iniquity.

@cperez8203

4 жыл бұрын

Psalms 7:11 God is a just judge, And God is angry with the wicked every day.

@cperez8203

4 жыл бұрын

Psalms 34:11 The face of the LORD is against those who do evil, To cut off the remembrance of them from the earth.

Pascals statement- Cant they say that we are Christians cos we find it attractive ?

Got it to a point but still a little confusing when ur actually discussing this with an atheist

Jesus also said if you are going to judge, judge with righteous judgment.

As a Catholic I agree 99,9% thank you

@bobbybower9405

3 жыл бұрын

What part don't you agree with?

@georgios7191

3 жыл бұрын

@@bobbybower9405 when he called James the brother of Jesus or something like that

@bobbybower9405

3 жыл бұрын

@@georgios7191 is that not biblical ? I genuinely don't know

@bobbybower9405

3 жыл бұрын

Also as a Catholic do you pray to Mary and Joseph ?

@georgios7191

3 жыл бұрын

@@bobbybower9405 praying the saints means ask them to pray for us and yes I do

John 14:6

‘In the case of religious belief, never attribute to intelligence that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.’ Hanlon’s Razor

Whu does he NEVER use the shroid of turin?

Can someone please explain the Homer Simpson joke?

@kevinmoody6730

4 жыл бұрын

I just got to that part, it was making fun of the fact that Homer said "yes" he understood and he didn't so the machine blew up.. saying like if we can apply the argument to itself, and it doesn't hold up it will blow up too

@JolinHard

4 жыл бұрын

Homer said he understood but he didnt really understand so the machine broke because he lied so hard :D

I use a lot of these statements with atheists it puts them. in a tizzy.

@mylucidadventures6540

4 жыл бұрын

probably dumbfounded you would try such stupid arguments. i know christians arnt inhertenly dumb but the theology arguments are so stupid and catered to people who already believe it or for those who are going through a hard time that they can emotionally manipulate you, i used to be christian to, and im much happier not believe a book with so many contradictions you need to do mental gymnastics to get through all of them

@RUN_IT_UP_

4 жыл бұрын

@HuckFinn God created reality before us he was

Santa Claus Vs the devil. Are they not the same?

36:50 a statement

I have FAITH that if I fall you can catch me. But, I do not TRUST you enough to step off the roof. Faith is not the same as trust and in the Hebrew trust is the word used, not faith..

EVERYTHING is FLYING and SPINNING through "SPACE" at brake neck speeds and yet our sky is a clock????? For SIGNS and for sessions!

@Whosoever.

5 жыл бұрын

_

@zacthurman3701

5 жыл бұрын

@@Whosoever.- Earth is flat and covered by the firmament just as scripture describes.

@Whosoever.

5 жыл бұрын

@@zacthurman3701 I agree , that's why I sent that symbol ____ you just didn't catch it lol . Yes its flat . ALSO , on another note , Read Genesis 6:1-4 ! For they are key to prophecy and the book of Revelation.

@zacthurman3701

5 жыл бұрын

@@Whosoever.- Ahhhh I get it, lol. Doesn't everyone know Gen. 6. Research the genetic work of Georgia Purdom, the multiple discoverys of Ron Wyatt and the shroud of Turin.

@Whosoever.

5 жыл бұрын

@@zacthurman3701 where do you stand on Gen 6?

Yes truth exists, unfortunately people think it's their brand of man made religion.

Agreed with 1st three. However, the New Testament part being 'entirely' true is false. There are a few mistakes in the New Testemant.

@kathyd456

12 күн бұрын

Such as...

If truth does not exist, is lying immoral?

@walkergarya

2 жыл бұрын

Truth does not have a physical existence, there is no object that is "truth", but "truth" is a quality, a property of a statement. Lying might or might not be moral, depending on the situation.

Andx xx

Search for Yahweh and Elohim. See the difference. Find the true God.

Truth among protestant denonimations --> church A believes "x", church B believes it is "y", church C believes it is "z" , so on and so on ... conclusion, it's ok different beliefs/doctrines, as long as we believe Jesus is the Son of God who died on the cross, we all go to heaven anyways ^^

@TrailToughTrailers

3 жыл бұрын

That is not actually completely truth.... many denom's have placed different importance on different concerns and out of that many have started different clubs. If one feels strong that this point or that is important you attend that church club. The foundational blocks of the protestant faith really never change. Certainly PEOPLE make claims that they are still within the protestant faith, but if they were to be honest they would say/see they have moved outside of it. Example; I have a friend who calls themself a "Christian" Buddist. That does not and will never line up with solid biblical teaching. What they are trying to do is really not possible.... you are IN or you are OUT, but you do NOT get to have one foot in one club and another foot elsewhere. Ohhhhhh sure you can say it all day long that you are placing each foot in different clubs, but the truth is, they are just plain mistaken believing it's possible.... according to the Bible at least.

I once thought that the law of non-contradiction was absolute, and then quantum physic and superposition. Truth is just always relative, to a person to a position in time and space or as he himself says as a reference.

@sunlightofspirt

4 жыл бұрын

Le Gentillet Croustillant ..... You stated what you now believe but what caused you to change from what you once believed?

@legentilletcroustillant490

4 жыл бұрын

@@sunlightofspirt As I said, the fact that scientist have reached the conclusion that subatomic particules can have different muttualy exclusice state at the same time have refuted to me the absoluteness of the law of non-contradiction.

@mattk6719

4 жыл бұрын

So what you're saying is, quantum physics demonstrates how it is possible for an entity to exist as a finite physical person but also exist as an infinite being simultaneously and separately while also being the same entity? Very interesting.

@legentilletcroustillant490

4 жыл бұрын

@@mattk6719 You've just demonstrated the mental gymnastic some believers (not only religious) are capable of to bend data in order to fit their narrative.

@kevinschaefer3945

4 жыл бұрын

@@legentilletcroustillant490 Actually, Matt K merely asked a question, hence the punctuation. Who's really exercising the mental gymnastics? Very, very interesting.

Please seek out David John Ridley in Thunder Bay, Ontario. He is here to revel all mysteries and understanding of The Holy Bible and life.

DOES TRUTH EXIST? Truth is a description that matches the thing being described. If God exists, then that's the Truth. If God doesn't exist, then that's the Truth. Either way, Truth (as a description that matches the thing being described) exists. Even God doesn't have any choice about the actual Truth of his own existence -- he's stuck with the Truth about that whatever the actual Truth is, and even God doesn't have the power to change it.

Everyone picks on flat earth but if you believe the earth is flat you have to accept design by God. As for the round not round part the earth is round you know because you can go in a circle E to W but it is on the same level like a pond or lake or your breakfast bowl basically any circle that holds a liquid.

@neoplasma1

4 жыл бұрын

Unfortunately this is silence by most Christians and they will not speak off it, they will not think about it. I believe even Frank will not speak of it. The other half will see it as a devil deception to keep you away from the Bible when in reality it is what’s driving people TO the Bible

@losingonlotto3449

3 жыл бұрын

Flat earth or not flat earth it still exist it existing is how we know God exist. (if I say x created y I’m assuming the existence of x to explain the existence of y but if I say x created x I’m assuming the existence of x to explain the existence of x what this proves is that non sense remains nonsense even when high powered scientists utter it) -John Lennox. There is Only one thing atheist can’t logically answer without God and that’s why anything exist this is what converted Allan Sandage

@latenttweet

3 жыл бұрын

What the hell are you talking about. The earth is “round” and hangs from nothing as described in the oldest book in the world. The book of job. The Bible also talks about it four corners of a face but we know a face is round and the head is a sphere. I don’t get the flat earth thing have none of you ever flew in a plane or did anything with gps. So you won’t believe the Bible if it says the earth is a sphere? Sounds like you just want the Bible to agree with your theory

@hiddenrambo328

3 жыл бұрын

@@latenttweet Job 26:7 He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing. Next time you look at the clock you might notice it is round with a round face but not a sphere or the next time you eat from a bowl round with a round face but not a sphere same with pizza or cups, toilets and stools a compass a lot of signet rings plenty of round objects with round faces and they are not spheres and these are also used to describe the earth in the bible (compass, stool, signet ring) things that are flat with a round face i don't see where it likens the earth to a head or eyeball or sphere of any kind of ball just round flat things used to describe the earth.

@latenttweet

3 жыл бұрын

Hidden Rambo regardless. The earth is not flat. I work in aerospace. I’m just wondering how far disconnected you could be to not realize that. I get all the points. It is a plausible theory, however it would only work if every single space industry was in on the lie. We work with astronauts. There are many of them. One of them was just talking about hanging outside the space station (repair work) and looking at the most spectacular view ever, the earth from afar. So are they all lying? Am I lying?

The earth is actually both- heres why. The earth is round but gravity makes it flat!

Evolution is easily provable to be a TOTALLY BS "THEORY". True science ALWAYS points to creation. Creation itself is testimony of the CREATOR.

@zacthurman3701

5 жыл бұрын

@Kelyaan- Knowledge is power and the truth will set you free. Have you done ANY research on the subject? Do you know any REAL TRUTH? I could recommend some channels if you like? You'd be amazed at the amount of things you don't know.

@steven4428

4 жыл бұрын

@Kelyaan Can you prove the universe somehow created itself from nothing, life creating itself, and that first living thing evolving into all of the different forms of life we have today? That is more of a religion than creation is, which requires a lot more faith.

@steven4428

4 жыл бұрын

@Kelyaan*"Where did I claim the universe was created from nothing?"* It is implied when one assumes God did not create the universe by basic process of elimination. For the origin of the universe, there is only 3 possibilities. 1. The universe created itself from nothing (violates the first law of thermodynamics) 2. The universe is eternal (violates the second law of thermodynamics) 3. Someone created the Universe (God can act outside of the laws of thermodynamics because God was the one who created those laws) *" I though all the idiots had ran off when they saw me ;) Ok I'll bite and i'll instantly break anything you have"* Starting off with an insult is not a really good way to start. Anthony Watts: “When You Resort To Name Calling, You’ve Lost The Argument”

@steven4428

4 жыл бұрын

@Kelyaan*"Incorrect you don't get to force your own things into this."* Nice assertion, but you have nothing that proves anything I said is incorrect. *"Also if you're going to try this with me at least know what you're on about, Who says there is only 3 possibilities?"* There is this thing called Logic. If you come across any object, either someone or something created it, or it created itself. *"Possibility 1 - You're incorrect it violates no laws* *Possibility 2 - You're incorrect it violates no laws"* More assertions....you are demonstrating your lack of knowledge on the laws of thermodynamics. The first law of thermodynamics states that matter cannot be created nor destroyed. So for all the matter in the universe to create itself is in clear violation of this first law. The Second Law of Thermodynamics is commonly known as the Law of Increased Entropy. While quantity remains the same (First Law), the quality of matter/energy deteriorates gradually over time. The universe is constantly losing usable energy and never gaining. We logically conclude the universe is not eternal. The universe had a finite beginning -- the moment at which it was at "zero entropy" So with that being said, an eternal universe would be in violation of the second law of thermodynamics. *"A fact is not an insult but nice try there Steven,"* Those are the facts and you are arguing against them. *"When an intellectual christian tries it with me on a comment I'll be the first to congratulate them on not making the same mistakes every other christian has made in the last 16 years of me doing this."* 16 whole years huh? That is a long time to be arguing against facts.

@steven4428

4 жыл бұрын

@Kelyaan*"Possibility 3 - You're incorrect, You do not get to assign special pleading to your god to fit your own gains, If so then it is perfectly fine for anyone to also assign them conditions to the universe ;)"* Again, that is nothing more than an assertion without evidence. You can say I am incorrect all you want, but you have presented nothing to support your claim. A claim without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. It requires much more special pleading for someone arguing against the existence of God. You must accept the laws of thermodynamics were violated when the universe created itself or was somehow eternal. If there are more possibilities then show me, and present the evidence that supports those other possibilities. If not then it is not science, it is just your religion.

Of course the earth can be round and plain at the same time - as YAHWEH IS OMNISCIENT, OMNIPRESENT AND OMNIPOTENT - which doesn't mean that man can exist in both (observational) "states" at the same time. So Mr. Turek you should correct this claim, unless the above statement is based on incoherence.

This is so strange. This is monty python.

@jonathanturek5846

2 жыл бұрын

Spirituality is strange to you ? Christianity ? Ohh yeah this Is UK know wonder the M Python analagy .. I like the young ones. Vivian . the guy with stars on his forehead !

Lol. What's the father's name? Or you just pulling this all out of your sound hole.

What does the existence of a god change from the fact that we humans are at the mercy of the laws of physics, even if it's still a fact. Reality is reality, right? Why does a human life suddenly become more valuable if there's a god? I never understand the value of that argument? If I, as a human being, disregard the existence of a god, I do not understand why I should consider a human life less valuable. That I see people as valuable is in my nature, I don't understand what the existence of a god can add to that. When I listen carefully to Turek I can't help but think that he often willfuly lies about things. The logic behind his arguments is often not to be found, perhaps his arguments are convincing wearing religious glasses, but objectively they are pretty bad.

@derrickevansjr3564

Жыл бұрын

With no God it's no purpose. And everything is subjective and the world won't stand on anything together. That's why plp like hitler can come into existence. Because he's not following an objective truth he's following his own

@brandwijkgg

Жыл бұрын

@@derrickevansjr3564 Ah...let's see. If god exists, he also follows his own standard. And God's own standard is to kill his own creation because he wasn't that satisfied with the result, also ordering genocide is something that is quite prominent in god's standard. What is the difference between Hitler's standard and God's? God's standard is as subjective as Hitler's.

@derrickevansjr3564

Жыл бұрын

@@brandwijkgg God create, take away and resurrect life. We need a standard, God is the standard. We can't resurrect or create life. We use the pre existing material that's already there. Not that he's following his own standard but every decision he makes has a reasoning and is righteous and judges righteously also. He just is the standard.

@derrickevansjr3564

Жыл бұрын

@@brandwijkgg and also the decisions he make he's also knowing the past present and future so he understands the ripple effect. Hitler don't. God makes every decision calculated and precise. Hitler didn't and taking life without creating it or able to resurrect it

@brandwijkgg

Жыл бұрын

@@derrickevansjr3564 you just made that up.

We can accept reality. You don't!

Jesus was.not passive .

@kevinschaefer3945

4 жыл бұрын

@HuckFinn Do you believe the Bible is a fairy tale?

@kevinschaefer3945

4 жыл бұрын

@HuckFinn LOL.

@RUN_IT_UP_

4 жыл бұрын

@HuckFinn if Christianity was true would you become a Christian?

@megs5217

4 жыл бұрын

@HuckFinn your ignorance is so cute :)

Theres no way evidence to show atheism is true? Ok so what evidence is there to show Christianity is true?

@aaroncloward1767

29 күн бұрын

You can’t prove non-existence, but you can prove existence. Existence is easy to prove as the evidence is all around us. Non-existence has to prove that it can’t possibly exist anywhere ever. Atheism is much harder to prove than God is.

As above so is below. As inside it is outside.

God seems to reflect the believer who uses that God as the justification for their evil actions against their fellow humans. That the values of God coincidentally align with the prejudices of the believer. I see that all too often...and in good, kind religious people, God takes on a nebulous form that has nothing in common with the retributive monster found in the Old and New Testaments. People choose the God that best suits their purposes. I choose no god or gods at all. As Tim Minchin said, "Isn't this enough? This world? How does it so fail to hold our attention that we have to diminish it with the invention of cheap man-made myths and monsters?"

@karens3805

4 жыл бұрын

You are one of the people who won't believe no matter what. I hope I'm wrong. The Bible tells us that God has mercy and justice. You hate both. You say he allows evil to flourish and that's wrong you hate his Mercy. you say he his a murderous monster when justice is dealt. You hate it. You hate evil flourishing and you hate it when his wrath and justice is apparent. God can't win with you. You have no desire for him. He will let you have your wish.

The story that Frank turek told about the girl who became an agnostic was disturbing. That girl's father spent decades of impartation of 1. time⏳ 2. Knowledge 👩‍🏫 3. Resources 💰 Into that girl more over she got awards for being a follow of Christ. then he put her in college only for her to betrayed everything. She was a Judas! She never knew Jesus as Lord and Savior she was just a ritualistic helper

@legentilletcroustillant490

4 жыл бұрын

Here is tolerance for you

@ntabile

3 жыл бұрын

At the end of her life without the turn around, that concludes that she is not a true follower Christ.

If you believe the Bible, then you'd have to agree with Jesus in Matthew 15:24, that he only came for the lost sheep of the house of Israel. You'd have to agree with Jesus in Matthew 5:18, that no jot nor tittle of the Old Covenant Law would pass away until the Old Covenant system, temple and people associated with it (what Jews referred to as "heaven and earth") passed away. You'd have to agree with history, that the Old Covenant system, temple and people associated with it passed away in AD 70. You'd have to agree with Paul who said in Romans 5:13, "where there is no Old Covenant Law, sin is not imputed". This of course means that salvation was only needed by those who had sin imputed to them...which is not us today. You'd have to agree with Hebrews 9:15, that redemption was only for those who sinned under the first covenant...which again is not us today. The bitter pill of truth is that nobody has been saved nor redeemed for nearly two thousand years. The "church" has been in a massive error; a complete hijacking of ancient Israel's redemptive narrative. "But...but...I'm a gentile!" Are you? The gentiles Paul and the disciples were preaching to were either Greek converts to Judaism or the elect diaspora, grafted-in descendants of the tribes of Israel who had been dispersed among the nations. Through the ministry of the disciple's great commission, they were called out from the nations to again be a holy nation of kings and priests, to be sealed for the day of redemption, which only they lived to see. Nobody today is a gentile of that sort. Today's self-appointed "christians" have been hoodwinked into believing they're sinners under a law that passed away...and need a savior who said he came for someone else...who will save them from a sin that's already been removed...and a judgement that already happened...and allow them into a covenant that was made with someone else.The fact is, we today, were never and are not part of ancient Israel's redemptive narrative.~Michael Bradley

He goes on and on about the law of non-contradiction, and yet he believes in a messiah that was both fully God and fully man....🤨

@sully8751

3 жыл бұрын

are you saying that, that’s impossible for an omnipotent being? 🤣

@drumrnva

3 жыл бұрын

@@sully8751 I have no idea whether it's possible or not. But if one is going to claim the law of non- contradiction matters, one can't suggest that it only matters sometimes.

@sandina2cents779

2 жыл бұрын

You are one person but made up of two separate beings. A spiritual being and a flesh being.

How can anyone take this guy seriously?

@goofyskittles

3 жыл бұрын

Pretty straight forward stuff.

No. "Truth" does not exist. There is no one object you could point to as "truth". Truth is a property. A statement can be true or not.

@DameEh25

2 жыл бұрын

Is that a true statement?

@walkergarya

2 жыл бұрын

@@DameEh25 Yes.

@jonathanturek5846

2 жыл бұрын

@@DameEh25 lol

Of course it does Christens just will not except because it contradicts their absurd book

Gravity doesn't exist. Bouncy and density explains our reality much better in fact.

@dwhite8005

5 жыл бұрын

Moons and rings?

@zacthurman3701

5 жыл бұрын

@@dwhite8005-???

@dwhite8005

5 жыл бұрын

@@zacthurman3701 You said Bouncy and density explains moons, rings, and satellites.

@zacthurman3701

5 жыл бұрын

@@dwhite8005- and you said you believe scripture?

@dwhite8005

5 жыл бұрын

@@zacthurman3701 Kent Hovind Creation Seminar. kzread.info/dash/bejne/pZytq4-agcS-dJM.html

It's not round. It's flat with a firmament dome just as the bible describes on the first page.

@dwhite8005

5 жыл бұрын

My dude, I completely believe the Bible but it's a scientific impossibility for the Earth to be flat.

@zacthurman3701

5 жыл бұрын

@@dwhite8005- What's your opinion on creation?

@dwhite8005

5 жыл бұрын

@@zacthurman3701 How do you not know?

@bobhawkins2997

5 жыл бұрын

Ohhh Zac Thurman, flat earther! God help ya Zac!

@ta3p-theannex3project84

3 жыл бұрын

Wow thats deep.

Mr. Turek, you should mind your words! YAHWEH NEVER separates HIMSELF from HIS IMAGE - man. AS YAHWEH IS HIS IMAGE in flesh and blood. It is the consciousness of YAHWEH'S IMAGE that - in its UNFAITHFUL AND REBELLIOUS state - separates itself more and more from THE DIVINITY OF YAHWEH. This wickedness and depravity of man's mind is the reason why, IMHO, THE LORD JESUS CHRIST has taken up ALL SINS upon HIMSELF stating "FATHER FORGIVE THEM FOR THEY DON'T KNOW WHAT THEY DO." ONLY those that accept this very fact and surrender under THE LORD JESUS CHRIST'S OFFER OF SALVATION can be forgiven by ACCEPTING THE LORD JESUS CHRIST'S OFFER OF SALVATION!

That Christianity hasn't met it's burden of proof is not a matter of faith.

This guy should be a duck farmer quack quack

God's word is truth because He invented the language of mathematics.

So many people still believing in the ancient story of creation in 2023. Religion is mankind's biggest failure.

Turek uses division, Christian versus Atheist, to dare his mostly Christian audience to dispute what he has to say, and to think for themselves.

@derrickevansjr3564

Жыл бұрын

Isn't Jesus going to divide us from the left of him and the right. He's dividing the truth seekers and convenient seekers

@josephrohland5604

Жыл бұрын

@@derrickevansjr3564 No. If the Bible is true, that event took place in the first century. Stop hijacking & inserting yourself into ancient Israel's exclusive redemptive narrative, the Bible.

@derrickevansjr3564

Жыл бұрын

@@josephrohland5604 how am I asserting myself. And you said turek uses the division how ?

@derrickevansjr3564

Жыл бұрын

At the end of the day he's using scientific facts and the Bible

@josephrohland5604

Жыл бұрын

@@derrickevansjr3564 Inserting yourself, NOT asserting yourself.

What nonsense Frank talks. Whether God exists or not, we are still the same creature with the same thoughts and feelings.

@on-the-way222

3 жыл бұрын

When did he say you weren't? The problem is if you believe that your life has no meaning then your morality is questionable. Murder, rape, any violence or theft should not be judged since life has no meaning.

@Whatsisface4

3 жыл бұрын

@@on-the-way222 No, I don't believe life has no meaning. It's usually Christians who think atheists must think life has no meaning. They don't.

@georgios7191

3 жыл бұрын

@@Whatsisface4 tell me what is the reason of our existence

@Whatsisface4

3 жыл бұрын

@@georgios7191 I don't think there is an ultimate reason for our existence, if that answers your question.

@georgios7191

3 жыл бұрын

@@Whatsisface4 wow okay thanks

I Seek Jesus and His Righteousness. He is the Only One Who Knows what is Right for me..The Trusth for me. The bible is just a lot of Men's opinions. I dont care what men's opinions are..they are a good way to be mislead! Seek Jesus! He is the Only True Source.

The Bible is the story of Yahweh's fulfilled plan of redemption only for ancient Israelites cursed with the Old Covenant Law of sin and death and pertains to no-one alive today.

@josephrohland5604

3 жыл бұрын

@@Isaac-wl6wu I came to that conclusion by reading the Bible without inserting myself into the text.

@josephrohland5604

3 жыл бұрын

@@Isaac-wl6wu No. I am saying the Bible says that salvation (redemption) through Jesus WAS (past tense) for Israelites only. Some Israelites were Jewish, but not all Israelites were Jewish. See these verses: Matthew 15:24, Hebrews 9:15, Galatians 4:5 and Romans 9:1-4.

@praisebarong9889

2 жыл бұрын

@@josephrohland5604 Truth is, context is key. When a text is taken out of context, it loses its essence. Take for instance Galatians 4:5 that you read, if you go to chapter 3 before chapter 4, you will clearly see that redemption was not just for the Israelites. For instance; we see this in Galatians 3:13-14, 28. Even the other scriptures you mentioned; like Romans 9:1-4, if you start from chapter 1 till 9, you will clearly see that redemption was for both Jews and Gentiles (everyone who was not a direct descendant of Abraham, i.e a Jew). The scripture Mathew 15:24 also should be interpreted in context as well. In as much as Jesus' sacrifice was for the sins of the whole world, in his earthly ministry He was limited to just the Jews and hence his statement. If you read the rest of the four gospels, you will see clearly that the sacrifices of Jesus wasn't just for the Jews. Finally, it's important to note that the Bible wasn't written in chapters and verses. Hence, to properly understand a text or texts in scriptures, you must read it wholly (i.e, read the pretext, the post-text, and then the main text in order to get the context of that verse). Not doing this will lead to misinterpretation of scriptures.

@josephrohland5604

2 жыл бұрын

@@praisebarong9889 Nice try with your sleight of hand, but you’re wrong. The gentiles Paul and the disciples were preaching to were either Greek converts to Judaism or the elect diaspora, grafted-in descendants of the tribes of Israel who were dispersed among the nations. Through the ministry of the disciple’s great commission they were called out from the nations to again be a holy nation of kings and priests sealed for the day of redemption which only they lived to see. Nobody today is a gentile of that sort. Pagan, non-Israelites were never subjected to the Old Covenant Law, and where there is no Old Covenant Law, sin is not taken into account. Stop hijacking & inserting yourself into ancient Israel’s salvation story. The Bible: It’s Not About You!

@praisebarong9889

2 жыл бұрын

@@josephrohland5604 We are all decents of Adam(mankind). God's salvivic plan which was proactive was a plan to cater for the consequence of the fall (as a result of Adam's disobedience). Mankind needed saving; saving from sin, from perishing. When you say that Christ redemptive work was for only a set, you are saying that everyone aside from the "Jews" cannot be saved and hence would perish. Salvation is to be procured to all, because mankind needed saving. Moving on >>>> The word Gentile was first used in the Old Testament and it was the Hebrew word (goy goy meaning foreign nation, heathen). In the NEW Testament it is from the Greek word (ethnos - which means the same thing as foreign and heathen). It was used on and for people who were non-Jews (Usually, by implication pagan). Hence, every one who is a non-Jew is a Gentile. This is what the Bible and teachers of scripture mean when they talked about Gentiles. So if God is proactive, and His Salvivic plan was made both for the Jews and Gentiles (Every non-jew including yourself and I), then the redemptive work of Christ is for all of "MANKIND"; Myself and you included. Although, when you say that we are not under the law, you are right. We are actually not under the law because we are not Jews. However, that doesn't disqualify us from Christ redemptive work because His sacrifice was to take away the "Sins of the WORLD". His sacrifice was to deal with the nature of sin. It goes beyond the law that the Jews were subjected to. Now, it is for this reason that even when Paul had preached the gospel and gotten a lot of gentiles saved, the Elders never tried to subject them to the law. PS: the purpose of this write up isn't to try to prove who is wrong or who is right. There are no contradictions in scripture and scripture explains itself. I believe with due diligence in the place of study, you will come to a wholesome conclusion. The Bible talks about rightly dividing the word of truth. It just goes a long way to say that, one can actually "wrongly divide the word of truth". However, we should try not to be the ones who wrongly divides it. Summary; the foundation of our faith is hinged on the fact that the world was in sin and everyone in it was going to perish. It was for this reason that Jesus Christ came and died, was buried and ressurected; and His resurrection was witnessed by many. So the Bible says that if anyone believes in what He has done, that person will not perish but have everlasting life. The Bible is a book that talks about Jesus Christ, what He did, and what we who believe in Him, have in Him. It is a book that reveals to us the life of Jesus and shows us how we as His followers have to behave. It is a book that tells us about our history and what led to what we have now. The Bible is for everyone who calls himself a Christian and it is used for correction, doctrine, exhortation and rebuke.

Of course Frank Turek also thinks the bible has errors

@TheDeadman419

4 жыл бұрын

KingJames BibleBeliever whenever Frank has talked about errors in the Bible he’s only ever meant grammatical and translational errors, which is unavoidable when you translate and recopy something down over and over again over centuries. He’s never said that he believes there are errors as in “this passage contradicts this passage” like atheists claim.

Why Do We Have a List of Virgin Births: There Were 100's of Virgin Births Around The World Before Jesus. Virgin birth (more strictly, virginal conception), in the proper sense, is differentiated from other miraculous births in that it is birth from a mother who is a virgin; and no male seed in any form is involved. Thus a birth resulting from artificial insemination of a virgin would not be classified as a virgin birth. Similarly, asexual births involving only a father, such as Athena's mythological birth from Zeus's forehead, would similarly not be classified as a virgin birth under this definition. Many alleged "virgin births" in ancient mythology are probably more accurately described as "miraculous births", since the mother is understood to have been impregnated by a god in either his own form or in an assumed form, as when Zeus impregnated Leda. For example, the births of Buddha, born from married parents, Krishna, the eighth son of Devaki, and Mithras, formed out of solid rock, were miraculous births, but were not the result of virginal conception by a virgin. Christianity *Jesus: The founder of the Christian faith was conceived, according to the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke, in the virgin Mary without a father through the Holy Spirit (see virgin birth of Jesus). This virginal conception is often confused with Mary's Immaculate Conception from her parents. (Jesus is the story of Ra the Egyptian sun god) Egyptian religions *Mut-em-ua: The virgin Queen of Egypt, supposedly gave birth to Pharaoh Amenkept III through a god holding a cross to her mouth. *Ra: The Egyptian sun god, was said to be born of a virgin. (Ra is the story used to bring about Jesus) Hinduism *Krishna *Karna Assyrian and Babylonian religions *Tammuz *Zoroaster *Tukulti-Ninurta II *Ashurbanipal Greco-Roman religions *Alexander the Great *Antiope: Antiope was seduced by Zeus and bore him twin sons, Zethus and Amphion *Attis: Attis was born to the virgin Nana who got pregnant after eating a pomegranate. *Auge *Dionysus: *Melanippe *Mithras: Mithras was born in a cave, to a rock. *Romulus:Romulus was born to Rea Sivia, a mortal Vestal virgin. Chinese tradition *Genghis Khan *Lao-Tzu Buddhism *Gautama Buddha: Buddha was conceived to Maya without sexual activity. tories sometimes interpreted as of virgin births. (DO THE RESEARCH... JESUS IS JUST A RETOLD STORYS, AND HAS NO TRUTH) “If You Think You Know Everything, You’ll Never Learn Anything,” “No amount of Evidence will Ever Persuade an Idiot.”

So many fallacies. It's absurd