Well, this made my homework even harder.

@manjudevi-jq8ky

3 жыл бұрын

mine too love from India🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

@Mongli_17

Жыл бұрын

@@manjudevi-jq8ky Hy manju

this was literately the most complicated way to solve this.

@genjaminfranklin

6 жыл бұрын

Honestly lol. It's not his fault, he's very intelligent, but the cadence of your voice is a little fast and you're very assumptive in how others understand math. You sped up at the most important part, which is, arriving at the actual answer to the problem. You should structure your videos so that you solve the problems first and then add the personality, and slow the cadency to .5x. If you do that you'll be a legend.

@darshanpatil4416

6 жыл бұрын

Neomi Beckett hi super figure are is mobile number come to be

@ilaila3504

5 жыл бұрын

You had a really good attempt but problem is we don't know what you are actually referring to most of the time, the number above? Or above that? Or in your head? They all sound very similar... Some of them m the same answer so.... You don't manage to explain this to someone who doesn't already know how to do it.

@TheyDontKnowImHere

5 жыл бұрын

Yea, he could've just factored out 2^3/2 from the beginning...right?

@murtazahasan8823

5 жыл бұрын

Yeah well said

Been staring at this problem on the Accuplacer sample questions for two days, makes complete sense, and now I'm kicking myself for not seeing it. Thanks

I love how you break down complex math problems into simple steps. Your videos have really helped me improve my grades.

this is a little more difficult than i thought

@risingsun82

3 жыл бұрын

🤣🤣

This was sooooo more complicated than it should have been! CRAZY! No wonder some people DON'T LIKE MATH!

I had to watch this 2 times before it clicked, I was so confused after the first viewing. But watching it again really made a difference!! Thank you :)

Thank you Jesus!!!! I thought I was never gonna be able to understand this for my placement exam. I used to be a math wiz, but it's been 14 years!!

Very well explained.Thank you very much!!

i just dont understant this...

@GurjeetSingh-gp6lo

3 жыл бұрын

Ok r

he made this way more complicated than it needed to be

The simpler solution to the last problem is having (2^1/2)^3 as common factor of both terms. Then simply multiply (1/2)(3/1). Final answer is still 2^3/2. No need to make the steps complicated

@Asemahle20

6 жыл бұрын

This is good to show a simple minded person all that happens behind in order to get to the answer. To use a simple method will show no execution of these important laws used here. This was a teaching method not a tutoring method. Its good really!!

@vive335

2 жыл бұрын

@@Asemahle20 this is the reason why students flunk math, you have to get them interested, by offering more intriguing ways to teach while also abiding by the laws, not this bunch of crap.

Thanks this video helps alot with the simplification process and I just want to say keep on going with our videos!!!

My mind has been blown thanks for the great explanation

this is way easier than other explanations! thank you!

@MathAndScience

4 жыл бұрын

You are very welcome!

Thank You, you made this make sense!!!

After a couple of minutes I realized this method is good and very important to remember especially when you encounter problems of powers.

You saved my life! Thank You

there should be an easier way to do this. so confusing

@aurorarising1945

5 жыл бұрын

@Scott Laux u are stupid u cant do that this is subtraction not division

@manasakaguchi

4 жыл бұрын

Just Some Guy With A Mustache Nani I thought you only comment on anime

Good to challenge the mind to apply laws well!!

Many thanks, very helpful.

What about when the exponential fractions have different denominators? Ex: x^(5/7) + x^(1/3) This can't be simplified, correct?

I don't understand all the complaints in the comments, this isn't hard at all. I supposed its hard because you actually have to remember the process, but that's part of learning. Great process, well laid out and no lazy shortcuts. Better to learn it right the first time instead of doing a quick workaround and finding that you quick fix doesn't work in all scenarios.

THANK YOU!! My dumbass was stuck on that one for an hour!!!!

great vid! I paused and rewound and it really helped. I LOL'd at the ugly fraction part, very useful

but i thought annnny number that raise by one (1) is itself, but 2 raise half can be something else, but at the same time, i know any number raise by 0 is the same thing as raise by one right?

Very helpful(: thank you

awesome tutorial, thanks

Thank you. This helped.

Marvellous thanks

2^5/2-2^3/2 yesssss thank you finally found what I was looking for!! Thanks!!

Thank U so much.. I love u man!! u r the best

do a video on algebraic fractions, please!

ok how to go about solving this problem if we had the same fractional exponents but one of them was negative. For example: x^1/3 + x^-1/3

Eureka!!!!!!!!! It's so simple once you see the light 💡💡💡

thanks for your helpful video

where did you get the + 1 ?

Why did you factor the second 2 but not the first 2?

Coolness. Super thanks!

thank you so much

great job sir

Awesome! thank you :)

this help alot

@MathAndScience

6 жыл бұрын

Welcome! Get our Free App and View all Lessons! www.MathTutorApp.com

Thanks man!

is there an alternative method of working this cuz i aint getting this!

this helped thanks

Dude this just made me lose the little bit of understanding I had left

Amazingly explained. Thanks a bunch!

really u r the best "

It's really effective

Very very complicated. Alot of step but i follow

very helpful

5/2 is an improper fraction. So he turned it back to mixed fraction. 2*2+1 would give your 5/2. I was confused for a bit but got it now.

But I think what is the answer or 2^(3/2)

Thank Yuu Soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Much!

Sweet!

Why was the bracket left open in the answer? So confusing

It's good(thanks)

anyone know where he got the -1? I need to understand this for a math placement exam

@TortureBot

5 жыл бұрын

I know this is an old comment, but he got it by factoring. When you factor, you place something that is a common factor (can be multiplied by something else to get each of the 2 terms) to the left of the set of parenthesis. That "factor", if multiplied by each of the 2 terms NOW in parenthesis will equal what you started with. So x^3 times x^2 equals x^5 AND x^3 times -1 equals -x^3. (or MINUS x^3) Just remember to always keep the negative symbol with your 2nd term, it's not just a minus symbol, but showing you the second term is basically negative.

idk if its because im in 3rd grade, but im sure there's an easier way >.

@sebskills9181

6 жыл бұрын

Eliezer Rosa now your in grade 8 or highschool😀👌

I rcan really understand

@MathAndScience

6 жыл бұрын

I really appreciate it! Get our Free App and View all Lessons! www.MathTutorApp.com

Sir 2 का power 3power 4 power 5 ans क्या होगा please reply me

Can anyone tell me whati is 2^1/3 + 2^2/3=?

yo, what if the bracket doesn't add up to 1?

@matthewfard2196

6 жыл бұрын

oh, na, I got it, never mind, thanks, I just gotta take 1 from whatever's in the bracket. Done.

@matthewfard2196

6 жыл бұрын

wait, na, how do I do 3^4/2 -1 without actually getting 8, cause I can't times 8 by 3^1/2

@matthewfard2196

6 жыл бұрын

ah, right, the answer's 8 root 3, completely got it now, thanks

@user-qf6bi8zb2h

6 жыл бұрын

You just answered your own question twice lol

Too difficult for me! Jason isn't explaining why. What rules of indices apply. Maybe Im stupid?

In surds…. 2^5/2-2^3/2, The square root of 2 to the 5th power minus the square root 2 to the third power. Which turns into 4 multiply the square root of 2 minus 2 multiply the square root of 2. Final answer 2 multiply the square root of 2…🎉🎉🎉🎉. Please tell me that is wrong and explain it to me why?

Nice

Wow...simple 😊😊😊

Please give short trick to solve problem like.. 3/4 power to 40 Or 3/5 power to 10

Why is there a -1?

I do it an far quicker and easier way but this was interesting to see a different method XD

How to solve (7/4)^(1/4)?

Can u solve thus instead

How to solve 32^1.05

please help me in this 2^1.42

how do you simplify 2x2/3+3x1/3+1=0?

@Devbhoomi_Shashwat

5 жыл бұрын

u can use bodmas rule here .. its so easy dude

the first 3 minutes was the most helpful lol

Jason I hope you know that you are amazing!!!

lol ive just tried to convert them into radical form then when I got 2 times square root of 2 I just converted it back to fractional form and got 2 raised to 2/3

@violethill4454

Жыл бұрын

can someone please verify if my method is easier

*_whose whole concentration is on_* 👉 *ARROW*

thank you, I honestly don't remember learning this in school... at least not until I got into AP Calculus AB (embarrassing)

(4/3)^-(4/3)^-(4/3) = ? Solve details please

i love ur sal cosplay

Why is this guy sound like Brian from game grumps.

@matthewfard2196

6 жыл бұрын

Danny Helser : Cause he's a mathematician

3/4*2×2/4*2

thank you!

Me legend watching this after 13 years, even my age is 13 lol

(6²×3-²) (6²÷3-²) exponent Sr solve this plz

thanks for the help thumbs up!

@MathAndScience

7 жыл бұрын

Hi, I think you underestimate this problem. You can't just add or subtract the exponents in this case. Have a great day.

@ROSBS1

7 жыл бұрын

He goes on and on to break up the steps, this isn't a class where you can stop to ask a question. Try watching it again, I found the first view to be very overwhelming and the second time everything made sense.

U are certiiiiii

You are a math God

so confusing....

Solve this any one (2.71)^0.12 manually plzzzzzzzzz

@Seanhaggs

6 жыл бұрын

2.71 = e round 0.12 down to 0 just for fun e^0 = 1 There you go, i cheated.

What happen to the five? You just replace the five

what did i just watch? i felt like canceling everything out!

why would you have to make it so hard ? it is very simple to solve! 2^5/2- 2^3/2 we have like terms 2 so its 2^5/2-3/2 notice we also have common denominator in the exponent which is 2 so 2^5-3/2 which is simply 2^3/2 !!!

@ansanoor4218

8 жыл бұрын

yes

@Redhotquagmire

8 жыл бұрын

+half full "2^5-3/2 = 2^3/2" by this logic you are saying that 5-3=3. Explain?

how to solve this one : 3^(1÷3) +3^(1÷2)

It would be easier to follow if he didn't repeat some of the things 3 or 4 times, like (2^1/2)^2=2. Because if I'm on a particular train of thought but then you just stop and keep repeating yourself, it's like running into a brick wall. Anybody who reads this, please don't do that if you decide to be a math tutor. Aside from that he obviously understands the concept or I wouldn't have watched.

So like x^3 X x^2 doesn't = x^5 lol

@koxo

8 жыл бұрын

+Matt Stubbert I believe in this case you're just supposed to simplify the problem, not solve it. But if you were to solve it, then yes the answer would be x^5.

Theres a simpler way to do this on math 520 i rhink just tht its not exponents ☹️