How you managed to communicate all this "matter" to me is nothing short of a miracle.Thank you,truly.

Thanks for everything that you do to advance our knowledge of the universe. I love all the content that you put out to help us expand our knowledge and thoughts. Thank you for all the time you put in for us.

@DrBrianKeating

21 күн бұрын

I thrive on comments like this

Luke was positively perplexed by Ob1 😂

Brian, itnis always a pleasure to listen and learn here.

Hi, extraordinary explanation, so much we know about the Universe, and lot more to know, all the best....

@DrBrianKeating

21 күн бұрын

Thanks so much

Thanks for the video. Waiting for devices more accurate devices than today to get a handle on the universe and understand its movement with greater accuracy to get better answers and resolve questions. Am happy with we don't know enough yet and look forward to your future work. You do good work.

This was a great video and deserves more views!

How big is the universe? There is a tree, there are oranges in the tree, and this universe is just a cell of an orange. The orange is growing, so the universe is expanding.🍓 This is an atheistic model.

30minutes, that's not enough, we need (and love) more! Thx Brian ;)

@DrBrianKeating

21 күн бұрын

More to come!

📍15:27 2📍 22:35

Silly question. There was a concern a few years ago of a helium shortage on earth. New deposits (as helium from my understanding can be mined underground) mitigated the panic over birthday party ballon shortages. Question beg: is there any data suggesting He mining deposits on meteors; or are there certain environmental conditions that present unique ways of identifying underground deposits that may help locate deposits more quickly on other celestial bodies? I hope this makes sense … I enjoyed this lecture- great one!

The classic big bounce cosmic model It is much better than the lambda CDM model because it can describe the same thing as this Big Bang model, but it doesn't need of quantum fluctuations, nor of inflation nor of a singularity. The Big Bang model It seems correct because it is what they teach and it is designed to ask and answer what that suits them but not It should be more important for any model of the universe, a more convenient model, should resolve the matter asymmetry antimatter, low entropy, three dimensions and above all, a mechanism that generates and controls both the expansion, gravitation, as well as homogeneity and isotropy of the universe and can also maintain the stability of the universe despite the cosmic superstructures already observed that exceed the predictions of his Big Bang model.

❤ with love for new experiences. BIG ERROR in measuring the Universe. Let's do the Michelson-Morley experiment on a school bus and determine the speed in a straight line - this is exactly the experiment Einstein dreamed of. Perhaps we will see the postulates: “Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and Dominant gravitational fields control the speed of light in a vacuum.” There is a proposal for the joint invention of a HYBRID gyroscope from non-circular, two coils with optical fiber, where the light in each arm travels 18,000 meters, without exceeding the parameters of 0.4/0.4/0.4 meters and mass - 4 kg.

Wait...that chunk came from an exploded star?

If there is lithum in every universe could we make nano or micro robots to search the depth of the500 billion galaxies so that when we send them using light attraction technology we could study in depth of the mind of our cosmology..thanks i apprecite the explanation

Further to the below, I am sorry, there were some typos, My keyboard is on the blink. Hello Brian. Please don't take offence at what I say, as there is certainly none intended. What you have just described in this video highlights that the standard model of Quantum Mechanics and Cosmology is misconceived and wrong. The whole description of how the universe began is wrong. Since the only thing that supports the Big Bang, which is a physical impossibility is the CMBR, the only evidence for an expanding universe is Redshift and the only way that the Big Bang can be rationalized in a thermally equal universe is by the idea of Cosmic Inflation, which is a physical impossibility, Physicists are going round in circles trying to support the status quo. According to the standard model, Gravity is not a force but is due to the curvature of space time, what ever that is suposed to mean. However, your description of cosmic nucleosynthesis just proves this theory wrong, for the following reasons. For this theory to work, there has to be a heavy body to bend space, so that other masses can fall down the curvature. Before any matter can exist it has to agglomerate together and to do this, there would have to be a force of either attraction or repulsion or both. Therefore, unfortunately as much as I respect how clever Einstein was, his model of gravity is wrong, and it is actually a force, and I contend it is actually two forces. It is the misconception that the universe is expanding that has led to many of the problems in cosmology. I contend that the universe is not expanding: It has no age because it has always existed much as it is now: It will exist for ever much as it is now: There was no Big Bang or cosmic inflation: The CMBR is not the afterglow of the big bang, but a point where electromagnetic radiation reaches saturation, and Redshift is not due to the expansion of the universe, but is due to the loss of speed and energy of electromagnetic radiation over distance and time it has travelled. There has just been published an hypothesis called ' The Two Monopole Particle Universe ' by ' Tony Norman Marsh ', which fully explains all of this Logically. If you type in Tony Norman Marsh into Google, details will be shown. This hypothesis can also explain Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Antimatter, and two forces of gravity, amongst other things. I would propose that the standard model is flawed at the level of the atom. There was no Big Bang and Cosmic inflation. The universe is not expanding, has always existed much as it is today and extends to infinity, therefore it has no beginning and probably will never end. There are two forces of Gravity, which I have a simple experiment that can prove this, and also proves the existence of Dark Energy / Dark matter. Dark Matter is an incredibly small Negatively charged Monopole particle in a cloud that fills every available empty space throughout the universe. Dark Energy, is the negative force of repulsion produced by the Dark Matter Particles trying to repel each other in every direction. It is also one of the two forces of gravity. The CMBR is not due to the Big Bang, but is a point where electromagnetic radiation reaches saturation. Redshift is not due to the expansion of the universe, but is due to electromagnetic radiation losing speed and energy over billions of years, If you consider over a period of around 14 Billion years, it would only have to lose 1 mile per second every 140,000 years to account for the redshift we see. This and much more is explained in my Hypothesis, ( The Two Monopole Particle Universe ), details of which can be found by typing Tony Norman Marsh into Google If you are interested and can provide me with an email address, I am happy to send you a copy of the manuscript, or it can be read instantly on Kindle. Kind regards, Tony Marsh.

Input! Lots of input! Thank you so much! Brain nom nom croutons lol.. and this is why you get the big bucks! Or regular size bucks..

تو یه دونه ای👍 ❤️❤️

Nucleosynthesis Explained, well their we go into another unfathomable scientific reality that no doubt holds within an infinity of 5 star earnings. I had to ad Nucleosynthesis to my dictionary.

Croutons? 😂

Hello Brian. Please don't take offence at what I say, as there is certtainly none intended. What you have just described in this video highlights that the standard model of Quantum Mechanics and Cosmology is misconceived and wrong. The whole description of how the universe began is wrong. Since the only thing that supports the Big Bang, which is a physical impossibability is the CMBR, the only evidence for an expanding universe is Redshift and the only way that the Big Bang can be rationalized in a thermally equal universe is by the idea of Cosmic Inflation, which is a physical impossibility, Physicists are going round in circles trying to support the status quo. According to the standard model, Gravity is not a force but is due to the curvature of spacetime, what ever that is suposed to mean. However, your description of cosmic nucleosynthesis just proves this theory wrong, for the following reasons. For this theory to work, there has to be a heavy body to bend space, so that other masses can fall down the curvature. Before any matter can exist it has to agglomerate together and to do this, there would have to be a force of either attractinon or repulsion or both. Therefore, unfortunately as much as I respect how clever Einstein was, his model of gravity is wrong, and it is actually a force, and I contend it is actually two forces. It is the misconception that the universe is expanding that has led to many of the problems in cosmology. I contend that the universe is not expanding: It has no age because it has always existed much as it is now: It will exist for ever much as it is now: There was no Big Bang or cosmic inflation: The CMBR is not the afterglow of the big bang, but a point where electromagnetic radiation reaches saturation, and Redshift is not due to the expansion of the universe, but is due to the loss of speed and energy of electromagnetic radiation over distance and time it has travelled. There has just been published an hypothesis called ' The Two Monopole Particle Universe ' by ' Tony Norman Marsh ', which fully explains all of this Logically. If you type in Tony Norman Marsh into Google, details will be shown. This hypothesis can also explain Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Antimatter, and two forces of gravity, amongst other things. I would propose that the standard model is flawed at the level of the atom. There was no Big Bang and Cosmic inflation. The universe is not expanding, has always existed much as it is today and extends to infinity, therefore it has no beginning and probably will never end. There are two forces of Gravity, which I have a simple experiment that can prove this, and also proves the existence of Dark Energy / Dark matter. Dark Matter is an incredibly small Negatively charged Monopole particle in a cloud that fills every available empty space throughout the universe. Dark Energy, is the negative force of repulsion produced by the Dark Matter Particles trying to repel each other in every direction. It is also one of the two forces of gravity. The CMBR is not due to the Big Bang, but is a point where electromagnetic radiation reaches saturation. Redshift is not due to the expansion of the universe, but is due to electromagnetic radiation losing speed and energy over billions of years, If you consider over a period of around 14 Billion years, it would only have to lose 1 mile per second every 140,000 years to account for the redshift we see. This and much more is explained in my Hypothesis, ( The Two Monopole Particle Universe ), details of which can be found by typing Tony Norman Marsh into Google If you are interested and can provide me with an email address, I am happy to send you a copy. Kind regards, Tony Marsh

extremely fast. difficult to follow

Please stop using the term dark matter. No one knows if it’s theory or what’s out there.

@user-rv8gn5qf3o

21 күн бұрын

It’s easier to understand than all the science behind it. Dark matter is would wide understood and it’s practically confirmed. There isn’t no other explanation for all the missing matter.

@bobdobs23

21 күн бұрын

@@user-rv8gn5qf3o wrong