A lot of people ignore The Fw-190s unique 'Kommandogerat' ("brain box") - a mechanical computer which automatically controls mixture, propeller pitch, boost and magneto timing, the plane was maybe not the best plane but its advances were incredible at the time.

@123kiwiboy

Жыл бұрын

the p40n had a rolls royce merlin

@hertzair1186

Жыл бұрын

By many it was considered the best

@jakej2680

9 ай бұрын

I mean the brain box led to a number of deaths when it prevented pilots from pulling out of dives. Experienced German pilots died when their planes just flew straight down into the ground because the brain box prevented them from pulling up.

@iskandartaib

8 ай бұрын

@@jakej2680 Why would it prevent someone from pulling out of a dive? It didn't control the elevator, it was an engine and propeller pitch controller. It wasn't any sort of fly-by-wire box.

@neighborhoodturnt

5 ай бұрын

@@iskandartaibright this confused me?

The P-51 and FW-190 both have a really special place in my heart as I helped restore both aircraft here in Australia for a short time during my aircraft maintenance qualifications.

@tastethesoup

4 жыл бұрын

Hi Ash!

@chunkblaster

4 жыл бұрын

That's badass bro, props

@_tyrannus

4 жыл бұрын

Lucky you, Ash. You sure have a nice collection of beautiful and rare WW2 aircraft over there!

@corvuscorax8459

4 жыл бұрын

Good to know my War Thunder content creators watch a quality channel. Cheers, Ash.

@Admiral.Gustaf

4 жыл бұрын

I dont expected Ash will come

The fw 190 looks great and the Dora 9 long nose and ta152 look absolutely superb to me. Kurt Tank was an absolute genius

@markjohnson6194

3 жыл бұрын

They are good looking airplanes. I always love seeing them in the Mustang gun camera footage

@johnnichols9056

3 жыл бұрын

I agree, Tank was truely a genius who designed many planes before and after the war and several countries too. The Ta152C and H were superb planes but rate of roll goes down as wingspan increases. The turning radius of the H did decrease tho and there is one account of one downing a Tempest in a low altitude turning fight with jammed guns. The laminar flow wing on the P51 also comprimised the turning ability of it, but with less weight it could still hold it's own. Great planes flown by brave men.

@johnnichols9056

3 жыл бұрын

That should be increase not decrease.

@tommcdaniel2208

3 жыл бұрын

@@johnnichols9056Just give me something competitive in performance and I'll take on the details myself.

@Mr.CliffysWorld

3 жыл бұрын

@@johnnichols9056 .. That's funny you mentioned that because I was reading an article , I really wish I could remember which university it originally was who published but it was , in short, saying the laminar wing configuration had not boosted performance of the the aircraft anywhere near as much as made out to be . This paper was saying the findings showed this to be true . Others say it's fake. All fake . They want people to not know where they got there "FANCY TOYS " . I GOT A KICK OUT ÒF THE GUY TALKING ABOUT THE MUSTANG ..saying that ifbthe laminar wing design worked as well as they made it out to be not even messerschmitt would have stood a chance against it . Now , I don't know abour all of that but it was fast, maneuverable , and regardless what anyone says she sure was pretty streaking across that azure field, sharp leading edge of the wing , the way the wing fit to the body , were all eye pleasing, she was streamline, sleek and loved to go fast ... Not many planes that are THAT beautiful are also not THAT lethal . The Spitfire Auqua-Marine , I think the model was what ? Mark V. Didn't matter because all the Spitfires were things of beauty, Those elliptical wings when she is pulling up into a steep climb . Her beautiful lines silhouetted against a golden red, late afternoon summer's day . Magnificent. Just grace and performance, the P-47's pilots were all envious of those Spitfires, secretly, but outwardly we were loyal to the P-47's, they had served us very well , built like tanks , take about as bad a beating a plane could and still fly, and saved many of our butts , but we we still secretly harbored thoughts of flying spitfires, such graceful looking planes just had to be a dream to fly, and it turned out , they were ! A very small cockpit and it and the whole plane kind of held you snug, but in a good way , you felt part of it , it was a plane with great 'feeling' . Then months later our envy turned to pride as we got to show off our sleek mustangs, to could see it in them . They WANTED to go fast and had no compunctions with taking on any other fighter out there , many with cool confidence, they were a plane to be taken seriously. To bad they were used for such grisly purposes for both planes. But high speed buzzing up and down the east coast, and I mean full throttle, exhaust full open high speed buzzing right up the coast , first day we got them . Boy we turned some heads that day , But they WERE and i suppose always will be two of the prettiest of the pretty ones . In my humble opinion .

A mustang was just discovered in a shed in new zealand last month after it had been forgotten since 1952 it's going to be restored to flying condition.

@EdwardOskarsson

3 жыл бұрын

How does someone not find a fighter for 70 years...

@nzwotb2525

3 жыл бұрын

@@EdwardOskarsson don't know but there was also a mosquito, 2 kittyhawks and a Harvard in the shed aswell which are also being restored apparently someone bought them to save them from being scrapped after ww2 to preserve them.

@dustyak79

3 жыл бұрын

NZ WOTB back then in a civilian could purchase just about any fighter for 1200 bucks. Even adjustments for inflation it still be a good deal. Cheaper than a new car back then

@brianwilke592

3 жыл бұрын

Must be one remote shed. In the US, every once in awhile some car enthusiast finds a classic car under some tarp in a shed or barn. Example; I recall reading about a 63 Corvette with a 327 with only a couple 1,000 miles on the odometer found in a barn. They are called "barn finds." In your example that is one heck of a "barn find."

@ZaHandle

3 жыл бұрын

@@dustyak79 if i can buy a plane for cheaper than a car then sign me up

I love the perfect union of science, engineering, and history on this channel.

@VladR1024

4 жыл бұрын

As a SW Engineer I love the methodical approach of his videos. Explaining the thinking process of the managers and worker bees, advantages and disadvantages of each such decision (high vs low altitude, etc.). I sure hope germans weren't executing their top engineers if their designs didn't perform to specification, but I' not holding my breath for that...

@augustosolari7721

4 жыл бұрын

AND dont forget the beautiful shirts

@OFFICIAL_VIDEO_AWARDS

4 жыл бұрын

Nailed it

@Leon_der_Luftige

4 жыл бұрын

VladR1024 The Germans didn't do that you imbecile.

@aaronseet2738

4 жыл бұрын

And wardrobe style.

P-51 is my favorite prop fighter. I was lucky enough to get to ride in a P-40 at a St. Paul air show in around 1989. My grandfather, bless his soul paid $600 for a fifteen min flight. It was amazing!!!

@StrangerHappened

4 жыл бұрын

Why? Piper PA-48 and other later prop fighters are way better (though no wonder: they are newer).

@laa0fa502

4 жыл бұрын

@@StrangerHappened no soul. Nothing really makes em special yet. In 100 years those will take the place of the p-51

@3isr3g3n

4 жыл бұрын

Lucky you, i only got to fly in a JU-52, which was nice as well

@FaderFlosser

4 жыл бұрын

@@3isr3g3n That's awesome too!!

@olliefoxx7165

4 жыл бұрын

Cool storey. Your grandpa gave you a 15 min ride and a lifetime of memory. Would love to ride in one but I'm not sure I'd fit. Did pilots have height limits?

This is a joke I heard decades ago. A few years after World War 2, the local parish priest was introduced to one of his new congregates who was a young man named Shven. After speaking to him for awhile he discovered that Shven had served in the RAF Spitfire Squadron 331, which was mainly made up of Norwegian pilots that had escaped their homeland before Germany had invaded. They spent the rest of the war fighting the axis although most of that time was in the RAF. The priest was genuinely impressed by the stories Shven told him about the war and asked him to come up on the next armistice day and tell the congregation about some of his experiences. Shven reluctantly agreed. So on the Sunday before the next armistice day, the priest called Shven up and introduced him and asked him to talk about his war experience. Now shven had a very thick Norwegian accent, but his English was pretty good. After a minute or two he started recounting one particular mission. "So we took of and flew towards Berlin. We were flying about 5,000 feet when we saw the fuckers flying two thousand feet above us" Understandably there was a chorus of gasps in the church auditorium, but the priest just grinned and stood next to Shven. "Everyone let me explain. Shven being from Norway has a slight accent, and the Germans had a plane called the Focke-wulf, which the allied pilots sometimes called Fockers." So the gasps turned to a sigh of relief and the priest stepped back to let Shven continue his story. Shven smiled and nodded his head. "Ya. Ya. Dis is true, but on that particular morning, the fuckers were flying Messerschmitts".

@puppylovera

3 жыл бұрын

that made me laghth, good storys

@georgepantazis141

3 жыл бұрын

Can I use it ? Classic.

@hueowen2786

3 жыл бұрын

@@georgepantazis141 Absolutely.

My favorite has always been the FW-190! I built a beautiful model of one out of balsa in about '68-'69! I couldn't afford a gas .49 engine to install and it came with a rubber-band option! I chose neither and once the dope was dry everywhere, I painted her to look as authentic as I could! She looked SO BEAUTIFUL when I was done!!! I was never gonna let her fly after all of that work! She sure was gorgeous! My other favorite was the P-47! I have a thing for Radial Engines and yes, I ride a Harley!

Amazing to think, that they were so capable at reliably making such high power engines almost 80 years ago. I mean, 2000hp supercharged engines is even to this day only seen in special applications. They really pushed development to the limet back during the war!

"The radial engine causes to much drag for a high speed fighter..." P-47 has left the chat. F4U has left the chat. F7F has left the chat. F8F has left the chat.

@Appletank8

4 жыл бұрын

I mean, by the nature of needing air cooling, managing drag would always be a bigger problem than the closed off, pointed nose of liquid cooled engines.

@Waltham1892

4 жыл бұрын

@@Appletank8 The F8F laughs at your mistaken assumptions!

@ohlawd3699

4 жыл бұрын

@@Waltham1892 So does the P-47M! 😂

@caif4

4 жыл бұрын

It's not a complete lie. Those planes had over 2500 hp to achieve those speeds. Bf 109 K4 achieved similar speeds with less power. The thing is that's it's easier to make a high power radial than it is an inline.

@wetzel1628

4 жыл бұрын

Sea Fury has left the Chat

My father flew the P-51 all the way to the E version. He was later assigned to the first jet fighter group formed. It was an excellent aircraft and he asserted he could loop any German aircraft he encountered. I'm just glad he made it home.

@23GreyFox

3 жыл бұрын

I'm sure he would have, vs a 17y boy without training. Somewhere on youtube is a interview with a P-51 pilot, he had a fight against a old BF-109 G6 and he couldn't beat it. Lucky for him he could flee and fight another day. After the war he learned why he couldn't win, his enemy had over 200 victories. Even a (on paper) better plane doesn't mean victory. (Sorry for my bad english)

@jeffk464

Жыл бұрын

@@23GreyFox I think you had to get to the 109 K-4 before you could say it was a match for the mustang.

@barryrammer7906

10 ай бұрын

Your dad is a great American. The Germans didn't have a chance against men like your dad. Put the bully boys in thier place. P-51 kill ratio speaks for itself. They sliced up the Germans.

@Diemerstein

8 ай бұрын

@@jeffk464 The K-4 was superior the P-51 in almost every category, what prevented many P51 from being shot down was that by that time, many of the K-4 pilots were kids and not experienced pilots.

@ajalvarez3111

18 күн бұрын

@@Diemerstein Well, since those German fighters couldn’t fly themselves…

I listened to an interview of a P-51 pilot that told a story of his first bomber escort mission where a ME-109 was clearly out flying him and he was happy to just get away from this guy. So pilot experience and knowing how to push their planes to there limits can be an understated but important factor.

@theblytonian3906

2 жыл бұрын

It's interesting to read what the legendary Erich Hartmann had to say about both dispelling some of the Fw 190 superior to the Bf 109 mythology. He preferred the Bf 109 and said two things about it of note. It was the better performer at altitude, and the more able/manoeuvrable if one was forced to engage in a dogfight. Of course his TOO was the Eastern Front where the harder hitting firepower of the likes of Fw 190A7 & A8s predominant at the time of the battles for air supremacy during the Reichsverteidigung was preferred given the priority of engaging the massed wings of B-17s and B-24s before diving away to evade escort fighters rather than engage them.

@retluoc

2 жыл бұрын

I always say that...it's not the plane, it's the pilot that matters.

@theblytonian3906

2 жыл бұрын

@@retluoc Overgeneralisation/oversimplification. Experience counts yes, but there are too many many factors involved for it just to come down to that. Numbers, circumstance, type advantage matter. -Outstanding- exceptional and highly experienced pilots in an aircraft they are thoroughly familiar with might be able to pull off surviving engagements where they should have been shot down/killed, e.g. Hartmann or Sakai, but even then as they'd admit themselves, luck counts.

@rimshot2270

2 жыл бұрын

@@theblytonian3906 Hartmann did not believe in dogfighting. He considered it too dangerous and a waste of ammunition and fuel. He preferred hit-and-run tactics.

@theblytonian3906

2 жыл бұрын

@@rimshot2270 Perhaps your comprehension overlooked the word "forced" deliberately inserted within the sentence in my earlier post. Quote: "It was the better performer at altitude, and the more able/manoeuvrable if one was forced to engage in a dogfight." Regardless of what his preferred terms of engagement were, things frequently don't go to plan in battle, and one doesn't always dictate the circumstances. i.e. Read the account in his biography of his engagement in a Bf 109 with multiple P-51s over Hungary where alone, he fought several of them in a classic dogfight of manoeuvre and evade until he ran out of fuel and hit the silk. He also states in the biopic that the Bf 109 was his preferred mount, and why.

Kurt Tank was educated as an electrical engineer. The Fw-190 had electrical systems that no allied planes had.

@hyennussquatch4597

4 жыл бұрын

Exactly. It was very "user friendly" to fly. The analog computer system for engine control was a marvelous and unique design for the time.

@1986tessie

4 жыл бұрын

And we still won.

@alandavis6429

4 жыл бұрын

@@hyennussquatch4597 that few realize had motors with bearings made in the USA.

@hyennussquatch4597

4 жыл бұрын

@@alandavis6429 Not true. There were factories making roller bearings in the Reich.

@waynesimpson2074

4 жыл бұрын

@@hyennussquatch4597 Nice one.You beat me to it, the FW engine management system simplified the accessibility of the aircrafts' engine performance to release the pilots' concentration for more important matters like...staying alive, flying the airframe and killing the opposition. Other minor features also made a worthy contribution such as the 'canted' seat angle/ rudder pedal braces to help with enduring G forces and the simple inclusion of an ammo round counter. We (the British) shat ourselves when the 190 revealed itself. The Curious Droid was also uncharacteristically lacking in detail when it came to the innovations for the 'Stang...laminar flow wings for reduced drag and the Meredith flow radiator which actually added a positive thrust aspect to the airframe. The Mustang gets my attention every time because its a metaphor for the results of Anglo/American co-operation. Another allegory is the timing of the P51s inception into the hunt for German Luftwaffe fighters...no longer were Mustangs camouflaged for their own protection? They wore vivid, highly visible designs with polished aluminium fuselages for maximum attention to draw up German fighters . It was a sign that the boot was on the other foot. Two superb aircraft with wildly differing attributes.

It all depends what version of FW-190 you compare to what version of P-51. In one case scenario FW will dominate, in other P-51 will. Otherwise it`s just like comparing apples and oranges. Simple as that. FW-190 wasn`t nicknamed "Butcherbird" for no reason. Later iterations of P-51 were hell of a good plane. I like both. EDIT: "Greg's Airplanes and Automobiles" channel has a great videos about FW-190 / P-51 / ME-109 etc.

@dragoonTT

4 жыл бұрын

Yup, maybe the Ta-152 and P-51H are a better comparison for later fighters as well.

@martijn9568

4 жыл бұрын

@@dragoonTT I doubt it for the Ta-152, even the H-1 variant. Due to the fact that the P-51H is in all things a new fighter that looks like the old one, but with British safety margins for weight loads etc in mind. Meaning they got a lighter Mustang while also using their own Allison engine, which by then became more powerful than the Merlin. This gives the plane even more of an manoeuvrability edge, while too reaching 770 km/h

@dragoonTT

4 жыл бұрын

@@martijn9568 Of course, sorry I mean no discredit to the H model, pretty much a new plane compared to early models. It was still a mighty attempt by Tank to design such beasts as well, he was fighting against the economic power house of the world.

@fedomandez

4 жыл бұрын

@soaringtractor the Junkers 213E was a beast with MW50.

@JohnSmith-oh9ux

4 жыл бұрын

@@fedomandez True that. BF-109K and Dora versions of FW-190 were a very good ones.

At the end, Mustang pilots had G-suits. This allowed them to perform higher g maneuvers than the unsuited Germans. As for which was better, both sides had a healthy respect for the other. However, the problem with the Germans was they were running out of experienced pilots. Take a pilot with 300+ hours and put him against one with possibly less than 30 and it isn’t going to end well for the latter regardless of the plane.

@justinheadley9453

3 жыл бұрын

At the end of the day it was down to pilot skill. German aces were able to achieve skills despite the fact. Germany was fast losing experienced pilots however.

@IgnoredAdviceProductions

3 жыл бұрын

@@justinheadley9453 German aces got far more kills than allied aces because experienced allied pilots were pulled back to train new cadets. The average allied pilot was far more ready for combat than the average axis pilot, especially towards the end of the war.

@markswain5021

3 жыл бұрын

Yes but the Germans had a much larger crap box fitted ! .

@mikemontgomery2654

3 жыл бұрын

That’s interesting. I thought the pilots of the JU-87 had some form of G-suit to help them not black out from a dive.

@rotorheadv8

3 жыл бұрын

@@mikemontgomery2654 I haven’t heard that. I heard the Mustang g-suit info in an interview with Chuck Yeager. It must have come in late in the war.

Fantastic presentation. I am fairly astute when it concerns 1940's aviation technology, but didn't fully appreciate the importance of high-octane fuel in theatre and the disparities therein! Thanks for that and your other brilliant insights as well!

@ehfoiwehfowjedioheoih4829

Жыл бұрын

10:19 lol

i appreciate the fact that you didn’t give a “final judgement” on which one was the best as it’s always a matter of “it depends “. Anyway both planes are good examples of beautiful well proportioned lines. I only regret that you didn’t mention the geared cooling fan in the 190 cowl to solve the overheating and the laminar flow wing profile for the P 51 and yeah I have a war story too, my father then 19 years old enrolled in the engineering corp of the Italian army was captured by the Germans just after Italy surrender on 8 september 43 and sent to work as forced labor in a 190 factory near Kassel and he was on the receiving end of many Americans bombing raids, which he obviously managed to survive.

@PappyGunn

4 жыл бұрын

It only depends on who won air superiority. Nothing else matters.

@WilliamJones-Halibut-vq1fs

4 жыл бұрын

Both aircraft were being continuously improved. The Fw 190 was likely to develop into a Fw 190D13 with the 2700hp Jumo 213J or Ta 152H with the same engine or the Ta 152C with the 2800hp DB603N. These aircraft almost certainly could have exceeded 500mph. The P51H and the planed P51K also very fast. As it was the Fw 190D9 had the single stage supercharger 2100hp Jumo 213A but some Fw 190D13 with the two stage super charged Jumo 213F entered service capable of 455mph. The Fw 190D13 with the 2350 Jumo 213EB was expected to do 488mph. The Ta 152H and Ta 152C with this engine would have been slightly slower but they had much greater wing area and far more growth potential. The Fw 190A BMW 801 Engine had only a single stage supercharger and this was its main disadvantage in dealing with the P51B/C/D. The two stage 3 speed BMW801R engine was to be fitted to a variant of the Ta 152C but bombing so delayed the program it was abandoned and reliance had to be placed on the Jumo and DB water cooled engines for high altitude performance.

@jeffk464

4 жыл бұрын

In the remote control world the long lines of the 190 d9 are far superior to the mustang but probably not relevant. The D9 practically flies as well as a pattern plane, basically the longer the distance between the tail and the wing the better.

@jeffk464

4 жыл бұрын

@@WilliamJones-Halibut-vq1fs I don't know the US military during WW2 was extremely, extremely conservative, you could say they didn't like to muck around with new equipment. German's always had new fangled equipment that was superior but didn't tend to be reliable or well supported. US soldiers could have benefited from more experimental equipment but the guys in charge figured we can win with what we have, just cost more lives. Also kind of describes the Russian philosophy.

@ddpeak1

4 жыл бұрын

Nivola 1953 Hey Nivola that’s interesting. funny how nobody has commented on your dad however it must have been awful for him to be captured and sent to a slave labour factory to do a Jobb he enjoyed glad he survived, take care, keep safe as we say these days and thank you for sharing.

_"FW-190 vs P-51 -- Which was better?"_ *Yes*

@randomsnow6510

4 жыл бұрын

Angered spitfire mk9 noises.

@CaptainKapitan

4 жыл бұрын

_sad Swordfish noises_

@spawnof200

4 жыл бұрын

@@randomsnow6510 pls, spitfire mk 21.

@RockinRobbins13

4 жыл бұрын

@keith moore And the Spit 9,and the P-47, and the Mosquito, and the ME-262, and the P-38, and the.....

@dogsbd

4 жыл бұрын

@@RockinRobbins13 I think you fail to understand the meaning of the word "best".

My dad flew a p51d late in the war. The war was all but over, and he was headed back to base when 5 folkewolf 190s got after him as he would say. He said i could have outran them with the Merlin. But then said..."I didn come here to run away" he got all 5 and became an ace in day. Miss you dad. McDaniel.

@ML-ev3ks

3 жыл бұрын

nice fairy tale

@jimanderson2518

3 жыл бұрын

Sweeet....that's got to be documented some where . My dad flew lancaster's & Halifaxs he survived the war mind you he wrote off more then one aircraft....shot down two ju88 s his crew did but Cancer got him in the end .....unfortunately miss him too Cheers

@vickihunt3598

3 жыл бұрын

Your living in Disneyland, 5, 190,s yeah fairyland , ha ha ha !,!!!

@Robert-yk8tx

3 жыл бұрын

Name, date, and squadron. We are going to look this one up...

@hb9145

3 жыл бұрын

LMAO

The lead designer of the P-51 was a German, Edgar Schmued, who had previously worked for Messerschmitt. The biggest problem for the German fighters was lack of oil. When the Soviets over ran the Romanian oil fields in August 1944, the Germans lost most of their oil supply. I talked to an B-17 ball turret (belly) gunner, that flew over Germany from January 1945 to the end of the war. He stated that he saw hundreds of German aircraft sitting on the ground, but never saw a single German plane in the air. Kurt Tank, designer of the FW-190, wanted to build a high altitude version of the 190 in 1941, but the German air command said no. All the fighting on the eastern front was at low altitudes, so the German high command could see no need for a high altitude fighter. Kurt Tank saw the US designing and testing turbocharged high altitude bombers and he wanted a fighter that could oppose them. Tank could also see that Roosevelt was determined to get into the european war one way or another, so they would need a big high altitude fighter.

@JohnSmith-qv6hp

4 жыл бұрын

The quest for high speed high altitude was a natural progression for every airfoce ergo the jet was seen as the ultimate solution piston were penultimate square peg in round hole

@Dimension640

4 жыл бұрын

Probably at that time of the war (Jan '45 and after) Germany lacked pilots too, besides oil

@ziggy2shus624

4 жыл бұрын

@@Dimension640 They also had no oil to be used to train the new pilots. When Hitler invaded Russia in 1941, he invaded with over 500,000 HORSES, because of Germany's lack of oil. The two countries that won WW2, Russia and the US, both had large indigenous supplies of oil.

@vickihunt3598

3 жыл бұрын

@@ziggy2shus624 typical yank you won the war what bullshit !!!

Time to grab some popcorn and watch the experts in the comments section weigh in.

@sonnyburnett8725

4 жыл бұрын

They never disappoint, all while having no background or practicle experience.

@suffern63

4 жыл бұрын

And then shake your head with how quickly insults are thrown.

@bandit5747

4 жыл бұрын

It won't be as bad. Just be glad these aren't tanks.

@OttoVeblin

4 жыл бұрын

All I know is that Tyson in his prime would beat any other airplane.

@sid2112

4 жыл бұрын

KZread comment sections are like a Springer episode.

P-51 was a long range fighter. It had insane fuel capacity and could thrive in higher elevations. Dangerous fighters to deal with when you think you have an easy kill on bombers.

@tellyonthewall8751

Жыл бұрын

no.. not capacity.... consumption

@beckyfrogers

Жыл бұрын

@@tellyonthewall8751 The fuel tanks on the P-51 were considerably larger than the FW-190, so yes capacity. With the addition of external tanks, their range was almost three times that of the FW-190, which gets us back to the point, the P-51 was a long range bomber escort and the FW-190 was not.

@tellyonthewall8751

Жыл бұрын

@@beckyfrogersFirst of all, I don't question which plane was "long range fighter" and which plane was not , don't know were you read that in my 1. text Taken in basic versions the P51 had 695 L inboard fuel capacity and the FW190 had 550 L inboard fuel capacity. That's 145 L in difference . . one hour flight for the P51 and roughly 45 min. of flight for the FW190. Not some big differences seen in the time ... AND the concept for the XP51 was actually *not* a long range fighter *but* an addition/supplement to the Spitfire and Hurricanes in Britain as the Brits couldn't produce Spits and Hurricanes fast enough and in needed quantities. North American presented the Brits with a new fighter instead of building after the Brits specs and that's how the P 51 was born. It was miserable at high altitude due to the Allison engine and a RAF test pilot suggested putting the RR Merlin in instead and first that gave the P 51 it's huge performance envelope .. and the "long range fighter" was born. Yes the P51 can carry about 695 L internal in the D version and only with the "long range fuselage tank" of about 300 L it comes to about 1.000 L. Adding two 350 L drop tanks gave it a ferry range of app. 3.560 km and up to 12 hours in the air. But it was a 'sitting duck' in that configuration until the fuel was down to half .. Due to the low drag profile and the Merlin engines good performance the fuel consumption was only about 143 L/h at about 300 km/h. The FW190 was from the start born to be a 'cavalry horse rather than a race horse' (Kurt Tanks own words) and an easy to fly and easy to maintain airplane. It was from start a concept like the Spit and Hurricanes .. a home defense fighter and a diff. resource consuming airplane. The A series with BMW 801 radial engine outperformed anything the Brits had at the start and first the mrk. IX Spit could keep up with the FW190A. The A8 actually stood out as a formidable fighter/bomber too .. The B variant and C long nosed variants used the turbosupercharged BMW801 and DB 603 respectively but never got full operative until the 'Dora' with JUMO engines came of the production. The fuel capacity of the FW190 was about 550 L internal and with a often used 300 L drop tank and a consumption of 185 L/h at 296 km/h gave it a ferry range of 1.360 km and close to 5 hours in the air. But consumption has a big role here too ... The P51 only used 75% of fuel compared to the FW190 giving the P51 an edge in range and duration ...

@tellyonthewall8751

Жыл бұрын

@@beckyfrogers take a look and listen from 09:25 in this clip kzread.info/dash/bejne/g3lnm7OmlrzIaaQ.html "half the fuel than ...."

Very good video. Congratulations. No bias, no preferences, just right to the spot.

This channel is never a waste of time. Always something interesting to find!

@charlottexue8023

3 жыл бұрын

*cough cough* nord vpn

For some reason, the way you present the sponsor is more professional and relaxed than other creators. Their witty transitions and almost desperate upselling drive me nuts haha.

My Ole Man flew 23 missions in a B-24 ( before being shot down and a POW in the Fall of '44). He rarely spoke about the War, like so many others, but once told me in all those bombing missions, he only recorded 1 confirmed kill and 1 probable when he was manning his .50 cal waist gun. That's how fast, maneuverable, and terrifying the FW 190 was !!!

I have no clue how I ended up on this channel, but boy, am I glad I did. Each and every video is eye-opening and interesting. Keep up the great work!

I'm glad to see Lord Varys alive and well and now talking about planes instead of getting burned by a dragon.

@KapitanPisoar1

4 жыл бұрын

The best comment so far! :D

@lino222

4 жыл бұрын

muahahahaha

@theshadowsovereign8914

4 жыл бұрын

When you don't have any balls to play with... you have History... just like Lord Varys' Balls.

@5crassrocker

2 жыл бұрын

I was looking for this comment lol

Hey CD, I have to admit this. You will always and forever be my favourite plane history channel. Thank you for giving me everything I know in the subject.

CD: Glad to see that you are still able to produce quality videos. Thanks again. Pat in Chicago

"Green Hearts: First in Combat with the Dora 9" by Axel Urbanke is an outstanding work on the people who flew the plane in combat and IMO a must-read for FW fans. Let the mindset of the old hands and the new pilots into the eternal question posed in this video.

Two of my favorite planes, in a video narrated by one of my favorite youtubers. And in the background one of my favorite songs by Beethoven. So much win!

@MAGGOT_VOMIT

3 жыл бұрын

_Ya talkin' about Richard Wagner's "Ride of the Valkyries"?_ _Yep I heard that song play when I was hungover and worried if I slept with the Fat Bish...............then the phone rings........!!!!!!........0.o_

You... you just had to step into this hornets nest. Enjoy the war in the comments

@humanbeing9079

4 жыл бұрын

Scrolled through 20 comments, pretty levelheaded and calm so far. Reflects the type of people who follows this channel and how comprehensive the video is.(just watch any of those dumbed down, lowest common denominator infographic channels) But when this gets more external viewers, the situation will probably change.

@Easy-Eight

4 жыл бұрын

Perhaps the FW-190 was better. Rather pointless given they were facing 3 to 1 over the Soviet Union and 4 to 1 in '43 over Africa & Italy. The FW-190 faced more Soviet P-39s in combat than P-51 and the Soviets generally shot down one German aircraft of all types for every P-39 lost. For the Soviets that was a very fair exchange, a fascist for a hero.

@jonathanmatthews4774

4 жыл бұрын

Maybe he's bored and wants some entertainment in the comments suggestions?

@LEGOBubuS

4 жыл бұрын

Btw, none of them better than the other. Both are true masterpiece of engineering.

@ightsixtwo1102

4 жыл бұрын

@@Easy-Eight you just had to didn´t you

The Mk 9 Spitfire was introduced in 42 and was more than a match for the FW190.. it actually came out the same time as the P51B

@CorePathway

2 жыл бұрын

Better plane but much shorter range

@stellartutoring2544

2 жыл бұрын

Not really, no. It was no more than a match

@drstrangelove4998

2 жыл бұрын

Well it depends which mark of FW190 you are comparing it with Gary 😉

@Jeffei-qs7kp

8 ай бұрын

How did the Spitfire ever contend with its own range limitations? Any Mk regardless of the amount of they jammed into it. Beautiful aircraft.

Actually, from what I read about the FW-190 several decades ago, the designer was only allowed to use a Radial engine from the outset. He was told that he could not design a new plane using an Inline engine as production of those were already earmarked for existing aircraft designs. Simply put, there were no Inline engines available for a new airplane.

I would have expected this from Mark Felton Productions.. Nice job!

@normaowens918

3 жыл бұрын

My heart skipped a beat after seeing the Dora near the end. I'd like 2 of each fighter please.

@1joshjosh1

3 жыл бұрын

You seriously come to this channel and compare it to another Channel, as if that channel is the pinnacle of everything. That kinda sucks.

@1joshjosh1

3 жыл бұрын

And in this episode with Dr Mark. The Allies secret plan to capture Hitler's dirty underwear.

@MassimoMSSR

3 жыл бұрын

Don’t know if that’s even a compliment.. Mark Felton Productions plagiarized many scripts for his videos from other websites and he doesn’t care to properly fact check what he copies.

@1joshjosh1

3 жыл бұрын

@@MassimoMSSR Bingo!

That Moonlight Sonata takes me back to "Wings of the Luftwaffe" when the Discovery Channel used to be good. Channels like Curious Droid have fully supplanted any cable TV history and science programming.

@warpartyattheoutpost4987

2 жыл бұрын

Totally.

A superb presentation - accurate, concise, and attention holding. Well done and thank you, sir !

Hard to find a good video on FW-190, thanks :)

I only hope, that when the Extraterrestrial beings reveal themselves to us. They will provide us with the HD footage of all those great dogfights of WW2 :)

@kwichzwellbreck3567

4 жыл бұрын

HD??? 3D with all sourround sound and you can watch from outside or inside the cockpits ^^

@leons.kennedy6710

4 жыл бұрын

Lol

@olliefoxx7165

4 жыл бұрын

Can you imagine the WW1 fighters dog fighting and going after armed Zeppelins? Howard Hughes movie "Hells Angels" had some crazy scenes using veterans flying fighters from the era. Amazing stuff!

@wdavis6814

4 жыл бұрын

Lmao

@bodenplatte1360

4 жыл бұрын

Bro imagine watching the Battle of Britain, Marianas Turkey Shoot, or Operation Bodenplatte in real time. Shit would be crazy.

Learn something new everyday: the fuel quality. Great video, thanks for posting!

Two fantastic fighters. Circumstances decided of the outcome of the battle, well said.

I really like all the information about the topic which makes this channel one of my favorites!!

Great Birds. The Speed They Designed These Planes And Put Them To Use Back Then Was Amazing. 100 Days, That's Crazy To Think About Today!

@davidrussell8689

4 жыл бұрын

Probably because engineers were running the show back then ! Nowadays look what happens when bean counters and box tickers gain control . Ie Boeing 😂

@jeffk464

4 жыл бұрын

yup, we spend decades and then end up with problem childs like the f35. You look at what a masterpiece they came up with overnight with the mustang and it makes you scratch your head, we are clearly more advanced, but are we dumber? Clearly we don't have anyone like Kelly Johnson working for our aerospace companies anymore.

There is a rule from the 5 Truths of Special Forces: Humans Matter More Than Hardware The guy piloting an aircraft is more important than the aircraft itself.

@sethjansson5652

3 жыл бұрын

Exactly! In vehicular combat, it's not the men you're after, it's the machine. It's a big reason why the Germans and especially the Japanese lost air superiority immediately. They focused too much on performance rather than endurance. The best pilots would take advantage of performance but could hardly rely on the machine Itself. Like a sword without a shield.

@geronimo5537

3 жыл бұрын

you can build all the hardware in the world more than anyone else. but it is all useless unless someone can operate it and do so efficiently.

@CallanElliott

3 жыл бұрын

@@sethjansson5652 The Germans and Japanese also didn't do things like rotate their fighter aces back home to train new pilots, so overtime their quality pilots dwindled, while the Allies continually produced quality pilots because they institutionalized the knowledge these combat aces brought. Also, at least in the case of the Japanese, they produced hyper specialised aircraft. The Zero was good for one thing, low speed, low altitude dogfighting, and little else. Sure it was fantastically agile, but when your opponent dives from above on top of you at a much greater speed, you're toast.

@CallanElliott

3 жыл бұрын

@@geronimo5537 The two also scale a little. There's no point in wasting lots of resources on high quality equipment for poorly trained troops, just as there's no sense in wasting time training fantastic troops and giving them lackluster equipment.

Excellent video! Consider making more about WWII technologies! This was an interesting video! Whether it’s the space program or WWII fighters, I always enjoy your videos! Keep it going!

The Bf109K4 had a top speed of 452mph and had the fastest climb rate of any prop driven fighter in WW2 due largely to light weight and 2,000hp (water methanol/ nitrous oxide boosted). To claim the 109 as inferior is ignorant.

@annirish784

Жыл бұрын

Sure but like the most common were the g version not the k.

@Hypersonicmind

Жыл бұрын

@@annirish784 To me it is about the evolution of fighters- The last variant of the P51 to see action in Germany was the D. The last variant of the 109 was the K (August 1944) They should be compared, as they are contemporaries. Unfortunately for the Luftwaffe, in late 44 pilot quality was eroded significantly, and often outnumbered 10:1 against Allied bomber streams. FYI the 109G6 had 2x20mm cannons underwing, and was a bomber killer- NOT a fighter v fighter. This was one of the most common variants. Interesting that P51 fans seem to be the most arrogant and sure of themselves while they are often the most underinformed...no offense (Personally, i love the P51D & N)

Love it when a new Droid comes out.

My heart skipped a beat after seeing the Dora near the end. I'd like 2 of each fighter please.

@daleburrell6273

4 жыл бұрын

...THEY'D BE EXPENSIVE AS HELL TO MAINTAIN AND OPERATE-!!!

Fantastic presentation. I learned so much more about these great planes, engines, people and the damned war.

FW190 Dora series are the best and most beautiful WW2 planes in my books. EDIT: With Ta-152 being the most advanced piston aircraft of the war, but barely made it into service, so I would not include it.

@randomuser5443

4 жыл бұрын

Do 335, need I say more?

@KapitanPisoar1

4 жыл бұрын

@@randomuser5443 Say Pfeil. But if we talk about "prototypes' then Ta152 was the best piston aircraft ever build

@randomuser5443

4 жыл бұрын

Ep!dEm Fair

@jesuschristhomeslice9492

4 жыл бұрын

Ep!dEm The P47 M was the fastest piston fighter of WW2, had a top speed of 480mph

@martijn9568

4 жыл бұрын

Cough, P-51 H Mustang, cough

The Ta 152 is such a beautiful piece of machinery.

@brandonstrife9738

4 жыл бұрын

Its a cryin shame he didn't cover the fact that none of the new features worked it was underpowered and over half remianed grounded at all time due to engine fires and overheating.

@HaganDave

4 жыл бұрын

To me, it looks like an aircraft with anorexia.

@hymanocohann2698

4 жыл бұрын

Not a word I'd use, potent, mebbe.

@thatoneguy7451

3 жыл бұрын

I don't like the overly long fuselage compared to the earlier variants of the 190, but if it had better performance then that's fine.

Nice video. I just want to say thank you for this objective and fair comparison of these two plane types!

I would have seen those aircraft flying overhead when the patch of land the house stands on was field, 75 years ago. A few days ago, a Eurofighter (?) passed over the house. CuriousDroid Videos are absolutely superb, thank you.

190 was an absolute thoroughbred.

The P-51 with the Merlin engine was a perfect match of US/UK technology. The US designed fuselage with a British engine was a perfect match.

@wilburfinnigan2142

8 ай бұрын

Davidca NO production Mustang used a British engine !!!!! ALL Merlin engines used in production Mustangs were Made and re designed by PACKARD in the USA and this versions of the Merlin were ONLY used in the Mustang !!! ! FACTS of history less the lies, hype and Bullcrap !!!

@davidca96

8 ай бұрын

@@wilburfinnigan2142 You do understand that the Packard Merlin is a licensed copy right? Its design is British, the US produced licensed versions of the BRITISH design, so its a British designed/US manufactured engine, thats not a lie thats exactly what they were.

@starsailor49

7 ай бұрын

@@wilburfinnigan2142The British replaced the original engine in the Mustang with a Rolls Royce Merlin engine. The modification was so successful the Americans were allowed to build the BRITISH engine under licence in America. Packard supplied the engine which was a British designed engine. I suppose according to your logic the Spitfire had an American engine?

Depends on the pilot, truly it does. Some P-51 pilots shot down FW-190’, some FW-190 pilots shot down P-51’s.

@ISAFSoldier

3 жыл бұрын

All down to skill, knowing yourself, your plane, your opponent's plane and a maybe even a measure of luck.

@0000SYL

3 жыл бұрын

yes, some pilots shot down over 20 p51 mustangs with fockewulf 190, If you faced guys like Egon Mayer, Josef Priller, Walter Oesau you were dead no matter what plane you were flying. On the other side, Hub Zemke and Robert S. Johnson were dominating the rookie fw-190 pilots

@WALTERBROADDUS

3 жыл бұрын

Exactly. The P-51 racked up kills late in the war vs. low talent pilots largely in both Pacific and Europe.

@erichkaufmann5284

3 жыл бұрын

sigma man some Luftwaffe pilots also shot down 20 spitfires with just a BF-109. A lot of Luftwaffe pilots had a lot of experience and saw combat more than any other nations airforce I would argue.

@WALTERBROADDUS

3 жыл бұрын

@@erichkaufmann5284 That is a small corpe of aces in a tired force by 1944 to 45.

War time technology is so freaking fascinating and at which the speed and growth it was going at is just insane.

You've really got to stop making all these great videos. ;-) I'm still sitting here watching while I should have been sleeping. Great stuff!

They always mention how early in the war the P-47's escorting the bombers didn't have the range to go all the way to the targets like it was some deficiency with the plane. They never mention that the reason P-47's were being used in this role was because it had a greater range than any other fighter available at the time.

@testaccount4191

4 жыл бұрын

also the Germans use to jump the p47s early so they dropped their drop fuel tanks over france.

@nightshade7745

4 жыл бұрын

The P-47 replaced the longer-range P-38 in that role. There has to be a reason. The P-38 was either inferior in performance to the German interceptors or less serviceable than P-47, probably both.

@CallanElliott

4 жыл бұрын

The P-47 is a great plane but a poor bomber escort.

@nightshade7745

4 жыл бұрын

CalzerDan watch Greg’s new video. P-47 had the range required to escort B-17s, it is the USAAF bureaucracy which banned the use of droptanks that made the P-47 a short-range airplane. They made the story that P-47 couldn’t escort the bombers to Berlin while the P-51 could, by taking the figures of the longest-range variant of P-51 and comparing to the shortest-range variant of P-47.

@danielmocsny5066

4 жыл бұрын

The crazy thing is that the USA could have had the Grumman F7F or some similar twin-engined P&W R-2800-powered fighter as early in the war as the P-47 reached service, with plenty of range, speed, firepower, climb rate, etc. to escort the bombers to Berlin. They could have even left the bombers at home and just sent thousands of fighter-bombers to do the bombing and fight their way back home. The fighters always had much lower loss rates than the B-17s, so for the cost of all the B-17s and crews lost, they might have gotten almost the same results with the same resources put into making a larger number of more survivable fighter bombers. The Brits of course had the Mosquito in a similar role of the fast bomber that was hard to shoot down, but with a modest bomb load. But anyway, it seems Grumman was only thinking about developing the F7F as a carrier-based fighter for the Pacific theater, which it wasn't well-suited for as it couldn't land safely on a carrier with only one engine running. I can't understand why the USA didn't develope a high-peformance twin engined fighter for the European theater (the P-38 not being high-performance enough). They could have even tried building a twinned P-47 like the F-82 Twin Mustang. It wouldn't have been maneuverable enough to dogfight with smaller fighters, but it could have kept the German fighters off the bombers, especially the larger bomber-destroyers that were easy for any escort fighter to shoot down.

More WW2 hardware videos please, really good topic and it suits your channel. Keep up the good work!

Fantastic video Mark. Hope you’re staying safe. Love from Pa in the USA

I appreciate the subtle nod to 'Wings of the Luftwaffe': Beethoven's moonshine sonata as a background track.

@bobbybooshay8641

4 жыл бұрын

*moonlight

A series of rare ww2 aircraft would be very interesting.

Amazing machines! Always very informative. Thank you!

Very well done! Quite good film footage! Thank you!

14:18 now that's some low ground strafe! Had to pull up to clear the target... 😂💪

Oh my God please more WW2 aircraft videos. Please! Such an awe inspiring period of military aircraft

1st I love your shows man. It's like your inside my head and make shows I think are awesome with awesome knowledge in them. 2nd everyone make sure to watch the commercials or to the end of the video. This guy is classy and gives you all this content and puts the adds at the end. So atleast give it a view to help his numbers for all the awesome work.

Great vid lots of interesting info such as fuel quality I didnt know about ... keep up the good work.

Merlin-equipped Mustangs had a ceiling of 42k ft? Wow, some jets even struggle up there.

@nightshade7745

4 жыл бұрын

I believe that is not the service ceiling but the absolute ceiling. It also depends on the engine variant. The Merlin 63 (V-1650-3) engine has a supercharger tuned for higher altitudes than that of the Merlin 66 (V-1650-7); the two engines are otherwise identical, and are interchangeable in the field. The V-1650-7 Mustang had substantially better low-altitude performance and was preferred over the -3 at the latest starting from mid to late 1944. However, the 42k ft ceiling is likely achieved with the -3 engine. The -7 engine was re-rated for running 75 inHg of boost in the USAAF and +25lbs boost (80.1 inHg) in the RAF after the availability of the 44-1 fuel, which enables it to outrun any production German piston-engine fighter at low altitude. There are relative few mentions of the -3 engine being rated for 75” boost, and no mentions at all of it being rated for 80”. Re-rating for a higher boost would not have improved performance above the critical altitude (if I recall is 28k ft) anyways. In my opinion, the 42k ft ceiling is more likely to be the absolute ceiling rather than the service ceiling, owing to it being much higher than the critical altitude.

@PenzancePete

4 жыл бұрын

@@nightshade7745 Just in case anyone is wondering. The absolute ceiling is just that, the aircraft can't and won't go any higher. The service ceiling for a piston powered aircraft is the height at which the rate of climb is less than 100 feet per minute.

@tomsmith3045

3 жыл бұрын

@@PenzancePete ....and they had to make it 100 ft/min, because if it were 300, some planes would have a service ceiling of 0!

@wilburfinnigan2142

2 жыл бұрын

@@nightshade7745 Most service ceiling I have read for the Merlin Mustang was the 42,000FTB !!!

@nightshade7745

2 жыл бұрын

@@wilburfinnigan2142 I highly doubt that, since all speed graphs of the P-51D I can find with the USAAF testing at Wright Field (Dayton, Ohio) don’t even have data up that high, and rate of climb all seem to have dropped below zero way before that

My uncle flew Spitfires and P51’s. He felt that the P51 like the Spitfire, was vulnerable to damage of the cooling as opposed to the FW 190 with it’s radial engine. He experienced that like the P47 would take a lot of battle damage.

@shawntailor5485

Жыл бұрын

P 47 warhawk ?

@tonyennis1787

7 ай бұрын

@@shawntailor5485 P-47 Thunderbolt. P-40 Warhawk

In 1991, Armin Faber visited the Shoreham Aircraft Museum, where only the armoured-glass windscreen of his FW 190, together with part of its control panel were displayed (the rest of the aircraft had been scrapped after 18 Sept 1943, post RAF evaluation) and presented it with his officer's dagger and pilot's badge.

Man, lots of really good footage here. Thanks for this video!

By far my favorite time period for airplanes.

The FW-190 was perhaps a better aircraft but as Lenin said, "Количество приобретает качество само по себе." Translation, "Quantity takes on a quality all it's own."

@CaveJohnsonAperture

4 жыл бұрын

Even early in the war the metallurgical shortages and oil shortages were limiting German aircraft potential, and was part of the reason they tried to shoot for jets early, which wile only 25 hour lifespans were way cheaper and didn't require exotic metals like high performance piston engines. In addition the high-octane fuels required were just unavailable to the Axis. So really by no fault of its own, the later 190D's etc would never match up to their equivilent allied "baby super props"

@profesercreeper

4 жыл бұрын

Weren’t there more fw-190s made than the p-51?

@zariumsheridan3488

4 жыл бұрын

@@CaveJohnsonAperture Jet turbine blades require even more exotic rare earth metals.

@imapopo2924

4 жыл бұрын

@@profesercreeper There were about 5,000 more FW-190s than P-51s, but more P-51s were made in a shorter amount of time and many of those 190s wouldve been shot down or destroyed by then, meaning they would be spread thinner than the masses of P-51s.

@CaveJohnsonAperture

4 жыл бұрын

@@zariumsheridan3488 In turbine construction and heat sensitive materials yes, but easier to apply overall, simpler to build and much less complex then the later pistons. Again, was only part of the endemic shortages of fuel and material the Nazi economy constantly inflicted upon itself since the 30s

Really well presented vid with detail precise explanation , plus a nice stylised combat patterned shirt.

Which was better is just a trick to get the attention... The real value is the information whithin the video, shaped by the point of view of the editor... I like it a lot, THANKS! Keep this running, please :)

Can you do more of these? I love learning the history behind the planes of the war

On the difference between the Bf 109 and Fw 190, I've always liked Günther Rall's view, likening the 109 to a rapier and the 190 (Anton) to a broadsword.

@randomuser5443

4 жыл бұрын

Look at the guns on them, two center line 13mm and a 20mm, or 2 several 20mms

@wape1

4 жыл бұрын

@@randomuser5443 Exactly. With the Bf 109 it was all or nothing, which was great for the Experten, but not so much for the average, less-trained pilot. You can see that same effect with the Mustang's and Thunderbolt's wing-mounted .50 cals. American pilots didn't have to fly until they either racked up an absurd level of kills or quite literally burned out.

@jebise1126

4 жыл бұрын

i think the designer made comparison between race horse and work horse

@jeffk464

4 жыл бұрын

The 190 was clearly the better engineered plane the only thing is the 109 had the superior engine. Its amazing what Tank was able to achieve being stuck with the inferior engine if he was given the benz engine from the start he would have come up with the best piston fighter of WW2. The Italians had no such restrictions though and came up with the excellent Macchi C.205

@bodenplatte1360

4 жыл бұрын

Or a race horse and a cavalry/war horse

Well rounded, critical and unbiased on a hard topic. Didnt expect any less though

I have both these amazing fighters sitting on my dresser... models of course, very nice models. They sit right next to a P-38, Fokker Dr-1, BF-109 and finally a Supermarine Spitfire. I gotta say though, every year theres an airshow near my house that flys all WW2 aircraft. There’s a lot of P-51s and other beautiful aircraft that fly, but I always look forward to seeing and hearing the one FW-190 (perfect replica) fly the most.

As a car guy I can only admire how the engineers were ingenious. Race/drag cars are equipped with the same technology nowadays. Quality content !

Both are gorgeous aircraft

G'day Paul, I have no idea how I missed this video of yours until today; especially as I'm a WW2 aircraft historian and enthusiast. Very interesting set of questions in your video. There were so many differing and constantly changing elements; both good and bad, about each aircraft; although it must be said the 'birth' and growth of the P-51 was a lot less stressful and fraught with danger than its Luftwaffe counterpart. I had already read about that Luftwaffe pilot who landed in western England by mistake, however, I didn't know they flew his aircraft so extensively in competition with the RAF's inventory of fighters. You picked up on a good point as a kind of 'what if' towards the end of your video. Here's one for you: IF Admiral Raider had got the 400+ U-boats he'd asked Hitler for in 1936 and IF the Luftwaffe had many more 190s plus a bigger pilot training scheme, as you said, the Battle of Britain could have been a devastating loss for the UK and, subsequently, the free world. Had Raider’s submarines managed to halt vital war supplies and then manpower coming to Britain; it's possible the world today would be a drastically different place. In the very least bad case, the US would have only had the main southern approach to Europe via Africa. Yes, I think they eventually would have come up with the A-Bomb but the 'on the ground' war in Europe leading into Germany would have added years to the conflict and placed a mammoth burden on the Soviets to keep fighting without the significant assistance it got from the US and the UK. Once again, I've got to say we all should be grateful that Hitler and his pack of in-fighting cronies were so generally incompetent. Thanks for the video, Paul. I'll try not to miss any more. Cheers, Bill H.

Nice touch using the old planes of Fame music from the History Channel. That was an excellent show but I cannot find it anywhere now. It reviewed lots of World War II aircraft and each one was done by a native of that country. I miss it. Nice touch

What’s interesting in the FW and the P-51 is how they were both relatively early in their design lifetimes. They could’ve evolved further, if not for the end of the war. Compared to the Spitfire and the 109, who were very much near the end of their evolutionary cycles by 1945, the P51 and FW190 had more of a future. This was exemplified by late war and experimental versions, like the TA152 and the P51H, whose performance ceilings were well in excess of what the older platforms could hope to achieve.

14:17 - absolutely insane flight

A great piece. Might I suggest a followup of the Mitsubishi A6M Zero vs the Grumman F6F Hellcat, and some discussion of the history of the Akutan Zero?

I wish you did more videos like this. Don't get me wrong, I love your videos on space & space technology, but I love me some WW2 video & having another go to source for this on KZread would be a good thing.

My daughter loved your shirt in this one! "He looks so cool!"

@burrelmuchenenduta5080

4 жыл бұрын

Yeeer u have an idea were he go it . man

Bismarck: "Why it's wrong to compare planes" CD:

You're a clever and competent Man, Curious Droid. Your videos show it.

(Schmüd), German-American aircraft designer (1899-1985) was famed for his design of the iconic North American P-51 Mustang and, later, the F-86 Sabre while at North American Aviation. He later worked on other aircraft designs as an aviation consultant.

The sound of radial engines is epic!!!

@mwbrada

2 жыл бұрын

Hahaha! I had the delightful opportunity to watch a P-51D take off 2 summers ago, and also a B-17 (Aluminum Overcast, I took my dad up on it) and I will tell you, the Rolls-Royce Merlin sounded amazing!

Both were awesome machines and it’s difficult to say which one was better. If I had to chose one I’d go with Fw.190 though. The cockpit was simple, visibility was very good, it had an ammo counter and Kommandogerät made it very simple to fly

@drstrangelove4998

2 жыл бұрын

Agreed Emil.

I was Naval Air Technical Training instructor in electronics on the Douglas SBD Dive Bomber,at Ward Island,Corpus Christi,Texas.I believe the SBD was last used in combat ,at the Battle of Midway.After Midway ,remaining SBD ,S were sent to Naval training bases.Most pilots loved the plane because of the armament. They often said the SBD stood for” SLOW BUT DEADLY “. With SBD top speed of 235 knots,it’s main adversary,the Japanese “Zero” , could run circles around it. With superior armament the SBD pilots were more likely to make it back home.

Really enjoyed this👍 really enjoyed all the footage and the talk Informative and balanced These are both fantastic aircraft thank you. I

'IF' is a big word my man :)) I think the Germans did amazingly well to put up the Wulf against the 51d in those circumstance's. America could, like you said, build them unimpeded, while Germany had to build hers under constant bombardments. I think with all sides even, the Fw190D's would've been a very (EVEN) interesting match against the same fielded P51D's.

@theluckyegg3613

2 жыл бұрын

Edgar O. "Ed" Schmued (Schmüd), German "-American" aircraft designer (1899-1985) was famed for his design of the iconic North American P-51 Mustang and, later, the F-86 Sabre while at North American Aviation. He later worked on other aircraft designs as an aviation consultant.

@ironcladranchandforge7292

Жыл бұрын

Unimpeded or not, Germany and Japan decided to start a war with an industrial giant with nearly unlimited resources. Not smart!!