The amount of engineering that went into this is unbelievable Just look how steady it is

@grdprojekt

3 жыл бұрын

Note how the pilot can drop the plane slowly for touch down, compare to AV-8B Harrier pilots that's required to turn down the engine quite significantly and slam the plane at the last one/two foot.

@Larsykfz303

3 жыл бұрын

well its not that impressive compared to su57 flatspins.

@Tejvir7

3 жыл бұрын

thanks for telling me to look i hadn't noticed the video i was just listening to the sound

@randomeastasian347

3 жыл бұрын

Blaise N'kufo Su57 is shit compared to F-35 lmao

@sgtfoley2

3 жыл бұрын

@LOCKON And it failed lmao

A fixed winged aircraft hovering is the most magnificent thing one can witness.

@UltimateEntity

Жыл бұрын

Yeah feels just like sci-fi

@worldoftancraft

Жыл бұрын

Where is any video demonstrating this "VTOL"s ability to transit into horizontal fly? Oh yes. Look for ever, find no thing what so ever.

@itzbrezaa

Жыл бұрын

@@worldoftancraft either not developed enough or done before but not revealed due to it being classified. many things about these jets the public doesnt know, because enemies can take all that data and make counters for them, rendering all the advanced tech almost useless

@worldoftancraft

Жыл бұрын

@@itzbrezaa do you understand that VTOL without being able to transit to horizontal flight is a useless plane-vtol? And it can, some videos show. Yet they aren't popular

@wirawansaputraimade4419

Жыл бұрын

Yes u're right, I only ever see osprey did that

Reminds me of the time I never flew an f-35. Awesome!

@rd8370

Жыл бұрын

Me too.

@rizalputramahendra2709

Жыл бұрын

Mw moment

@tomkoa521

Жыл бұрын

Reminds me of the time I did and yes very awesome!!! ⚡️ 🤘

@HeyYouFromThatGame

Жыл бұрын

Me too.

@aresfalcon1011

10 ай бұрын

dude i fly them all the time! (in gta ;-;)

Keyboard warriors: “the F-35 is bad” The F-35 hovering outside their house:

@jlo7770

3 ай бұрын

They do seem to crash... a lot

@Darakyoutane

3 ай бұрын

29% turned out to be operational, and many many many models seem to just fizzle out somehow. Lockheed is a money grabbing corporation, the US government better get these contractors in check, this is of utmost importance.

@jlo7770

3 ай бұрын

@@Darakyoutane I've noticed a lot of the nato countries have issues with them as well. Watched a video of the British navy sending one into the ocean lmfao, you know though American acceptionalism at its best

@Rorywizz

2 ай бұрын

​@@jlo7770Apparently mistakes can happen sometimes

@jlo7770

2 ай бұрын

@@Rorywizz well it's a 100 million dollar mistake everytime one of these f35 decideds to act up. I will accept that that unqualified woman "fighter pilot" did ditch an f35 into the south china sea and that was 100% her fault, but "mistakes" in engineering should be ironed out before they're nilly willy flying over civilian infrastructure and the pilot gets ejected over land and the jet f's off for 50 miles until it finally crashes into someone's yard. The faa is kinda stringent when it comes to flying. If I slapped some garbage together and it had a high failure rate I sure af wouldn't be able to fly it. But then again we can look at Boeing and see those jet liners are falling apart mid flight and the faa doesnt particularly seem to care cuz the tax payers will be stuck paying for it. It's not a "mistake" when there's a ton of videos out there of these jets doing the exact opposite of what they're suppose to do and that flying into the ground or water. It's more than a simple "mistake"

So it was realistic after all how i started my toy planes as a kid

@hardpointidentified

3 жыл бұрын

Konstanley Jerknov reverse card

@xx4095

3 жыл бұрын

Konstanley Jerknov kzread.info/dash/bejne/dp-ntbKThL2rg5M.html

@shanealdridge8893

3 жыл бұрын

This dude is just jealous he probably lives in a broken down house and has never been laid, only from his mother who probably regretted having him and thought about having an abortion

@amistrophy

3 жыл бұрын

Konstanley Jerknov Soviet Union*

@shanealdridge8893

3 жыл бұрын

Lol who's mad? I love my country :)

The computers onboard must be doing so many calcs per second to keep that thing level. Insane.

@Sanyu-Tumusiime

3 жыл бұрын

Not really or maybe it’s just evenly distributed propulsion keeping it naturally stable

@ptbro3334

2 жыл бұрын

@@Sanyu-Tumusiime Yeah bro,we are definitely going with your *maybe theory* when it comes to the f-35 Advanced sensors

@Sanyu-Tumusiime

2 жыл бұрын

@@ptbro3334 Yeah bro, you're not even from the country which makes them

@davidhasslehoff4379

2 жыл бұрын

@@Sanyu-Tumusiime yeah and neither of you have know what you're talking about so who cares

@Sanyu-Tumusiime

2 жыл бұрын

@@davidhasslehoff4379 i was an aerospace engineer

Those things are honestly the coolest jets I've ever seen in real life. There super loud too

@sierra6993

Жыл бұрын

Like- JESUS christ it’s loud. Only plane as loud as the F-35 is the goddamned Harrier

@encryptedaviation1452

Жыл бұрын

@@sierra6993 that’s because the thrust bounces onto the ground and shakes the ground creating more intense vibrations and even more noise it also requires A LOT of power for VTOL

@sierra6993

Жыл бұрын

@@encryptedaviation1452 it’s also probably because it sits still instead of passing by fast

@christopherchartier3017

10 ай бұрын

It’s also powered by the damn PW-F-135 engine, the most powerful engine fitted to a single engine fighter

@user-ip3qi9rf7l

9 ай бұрын

right, i had to research its sound by watching this video because i saw one at a way closer distance than this camera man and it was silently hovering in a residential area just above street lights at night going into between two hills illegally by skunk works and i was the only witness. must be a prototype or a ufo disguised as an f35. at edwards afb area.

The amount of energy required to keep that aircraft hovering must be unbelievable

@theelephantintheroom69

2 ай бұрын

It needs to lift the equivalent weight in air to itself to stay hovering. Insane to imagine standing underneath the engine or fan

@Nicalobocinator

Ай бұрын

@@theelephantintheroom69it melts asphalt which is why you find them doing stovl takeoffs (short takeoffs) using the vtol instead of straight up vertical takeoffs, so yeah i wouldnt want to be under it

You just never get tired of watching an aircraft taking off vertically. And I've been flying helicopters for over 12 years...

@julians.2597

2 жыл бұрын

It just seems wrong, doesn't it? Like it's completely unnatural, yet it's hapoening

@siloedspace

2 жыл бұрын

@@julians.2597 To me, it's not wrong in the sense it shouldn't happen, it just doesnt seem correct, it's more of a "It COULD do that?"

@rinessiner4801

2 жыл бұрын

well there is a difference in helicopter and planes moreover you dont usually go and see a monkey climbing tree but you wont set your eyes off if a fish was doing that

@LebronCCP

Жыл бұрын

and to think this could have paid off my student debt!

@TeenWithACarrotIDK

Жыл бұрын

@@LebronCCP well, I guess the US cares more about air defence than about student dept.

I remember taking off for the first time from Michael's house

@smokecrash2147

4 жыл бұрын

michaels house? What game are you talking about?

@nityasingh3

4 жыл бұрын

@@smokecrash2147 GTA V

@smokecrash2147

4 жыл бұрын

@@nityasingh3 But there isnt even a harrier V II in GTA V let alone a helipad or a suitable landing spot on michaels estate

@nityasingh3

4 жыл бұрын

@@smokecrash2147 ive added F-35 mod, And the tennis court of Michael's house is perfect for vertical landing and takeoff

@smokecrash2147

4 жыл бұрын

@@nityasingh3 ...

You don't actually need a runway to take off or land this machine. This is awesome

@4_youtube_is_dead

Жыл бұрын

wahahahah

@Voltaic_Fire

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, that's the whole point of developing VTOL aircraft. Being able to land and takeoff from pretty much anywhere is a huge tactical advantage, it goes a long way towards nullifying the tactic of targeting one's airfields.

@AnytingGoes

Жыл бұрын

Agreed, the british were launching Harriers from container boats during the falklands war in the 70s, the argientines were wondering how they were getting fighter jets to the war after destroying the british main carrier!

@northdevon999

Жыл бұрын

Urm the Argentines never sank a carrier?

@ThomasHendrickson

10 ай бұрын

Italy, for example, really benefits from VTOL jets because they don’t really have a lot of adequate runways. They loved the harrier, and when they have enough money they intend to buy the F-35B.

It's crazy how this technology has been a thing for more than 20 years yet many people haven't heard about it Edit: Please stop saying VTOL technology is 60 years old. I know. I get it, but I was referring to the F-35 being about 20+ years old

@samrodriguez3311

2 жыл бұрын

Harrier: allow me to introduce myself

@himeskids

2 жыл бұрын

I think the biggest difference between the F35 and the Harrier is the lack of need for cooling water (I could be wrong, I just vaguely remember someone mentioning it) and the F35 having stealth capabilities like the F22 does.

@Rena152

2 жыл бұрын

@@samrodriguez3311 ikr? VTOL aircraft have existed for a long time yet some people see this video and think its new

@geraltofrivia3344

2 жыл бұрын

Star Wars in real life. Looks just like an x wing taking off lol. Or should I say the x wing looks like the f-35 lolz

@andressoto739

2 жыл бұрын

It's 400 year old technology. Isaac Newton gave f=ma. Just didn't know how to engineer it.

Me: wow technology is really advancing Also me: oh, this video is seven years old

@ConspiracyCraftersStudio

4 жыл бұрын

probably much older, they are just ready to show it to the public

@arenomusic

4 жыл бұрын

@Franco Firewall VTOL TECHNOLOGY HAS BEEN AROUND FOR 50 FUCKING YEARS WE ARE LIVING IN THE FUTURE

@gr8cescale

3 жыл бұрын

@@arenomusic STOP BEING SO AGGRESSIVE PLEASE!!

@EllAntares

3 жыл бұрын

Meh, they designed it based on aircraft which was 30 year around (Sukhoi 27 and it's descendants, direct connection to engine design of F-35)

@humorss

3 жыл бұрын

@@gr8cescale his name say music though

It's a beautiful piece of engineering.

@codyhernandez791

5 жыл бұрын

Acutally this is the worst price of shitty aircraft i ever seen. It wasted so much on the Defence Budget and now Congress keeps buying it. The navy still have difficulties with it's carrier landings as for maintain the aircraft is too expensive. The f14 Tomcat is the best and sexist aircraft i ever seen. (Lmao this is a joke, the f35 has it's pros and cons.)

@urbanmidnight1

5 жыл бұрын

If you like set squares yes...Concorde was a beautiful piece of engineering. This looks like a ruler and a set square made love no thanks.

@tejaskumar265

5 жыл бұрын

@@codyhernandez791 this plane has serious stalling issues

@Blowww.YourMind

5 жыл бұрын

How much fuel it Burns? Hi trust engine needs hi fuel to fly small wings aircraft..

@simplysimple7628

5 жыл бұрын

Unreal engineering definitely. That vertical take off is so useful in some situations. Planes are just fascinating machines.

I went to the DC air show a few years ago and they were flying these…. Freaking unbelievable

Anyone here in 2024?

@IndigoFlamegaming12

14 күн бұрын

Yep

@chasemagann9026

10 күн бұрын

Yeah a TikTok came up about jets and I got curious and here I am

@justcallmeBIG_L

7 күн бұрын

Nope

@TomcatWT

4 күн бұрын

Yes

@TheLegoTrooper173

3 күн бұрын

Yep

imagine how many alien Spaceship sightings this bad boy must have been responsible for

@ismailkitmane3719

3 жыл бұрын

More like, how many alien crashes it took to come up with the technology.

@ryanm.191

3 жыл бұрын

Ismail Kitmane this ^

@Biobele

3 жыл бұрын

@@ismailkitmane3719 🤯🤯 burst my brain. Hmm that's a good one.

@kyrlchristianboni5263

3 жыл бұрын

laughs in B2 Spirit

@mikethespike056

3 жыл бұрын

@@ismailkitmane3719 It's simple as shit. A five year old could come up with the design. You just need the engineers to make it work without blowing up. That's why it takes *time* and we're seeing it just now and not fifty years ago.

Now make it look like a ufo and fly it by an old camera convention.

@Infamouschef_

4 жыл бұрын

Calthecool That would be fun

@FrankyPi

4 жыл бұрын

Wouldn't be convincing because it's extremely loud, like all jets are. Genuine UFO's make no sound even when in close proximity only a slight humming noise is sometimes heard.

@Tacticaviator7

4 жыл бұрын

@@FrankyPi uh oh, do you precisly know what a UFO is?

@danielt.9154

4 жыл бұрын

@@Tacticaviator7 Bob Lazar confirmed

@PhilipReeder

4 жыл бұрын

Interesting you should say that. In summer 1969, my family lived in Berkeley Missouri which is a few miles east of Lambert International airport-St. Louis. Lambert airport was the location of the Headquarters for McDonnell Douglas Aviation. Just days after the lunar landing of Apollo 11, my father was driving my sister and I on Lindbergh Ave. approaching Interstate 270/255 which is northwest of the airport. As we approached the highway overpass we saw something over the roadway. This area was not undeveloped like a farmer's field. It was primarily a business community with car dealerships and restaurants. Beyond the interchange on all sides was single family residential housing. It was of course not unusual to see aircraft considering the proximity to the airport, but this did not seem to be moving. And it was no helicopter. It was primarily white with orange painted highlights and it was floating essentially motionless. This being a summer day around 11 am, and clear blue skies, it hovered over the southeast cloverleaf of the interchange at about 200 feet. And it was LOUD. As we got closer to it my father began slowing down our car as we all looked at this thing, mouths open in amazement. We weren't the only ones either. It was a Saturday morning and traffic was very light, but other cars on all the various lanes and directions were slowing to have a look to the degrees that traffic came to a halt. My sister asked, "What is that? A UFO?" She was 4 years older than me, my being 5 years of age. I think my father's reply was along the lines of, "I dunno." We passed by it within several hundred feet at a snail's pace while it rotated slightly. Once we were about a quarter mile away it rose to a higher altitude and moved away. The discussion for the next ten minutes was obviously what it was, how it stayed in the air and where it came from. Considering the recent moon landing and related extraterrestrial life/UFO discussions on the news, my sister admitted to being afraid of whatever it was. When we returned home we told our mother and older brothers about it. Big mistake. Of course they assumed we were kidding. When our father confirmed what we saw, he also became the receiver of frowns and snickering from our brothers. My mother asked him if it was true, which he said it was, but even mom gave him a look of "Seriously?........" Eventually we learned it was better to not bring up the subject anymore for fear of mocking. Many years later, while visiting Schaeffer's Hobby Shop in south St. Louis, (I was probably in my early twenties) I was looking through the "In Action" series of Squadron aircraft soft back books when something caught my eye. On the back of one was an artist's rendition of the aircraft I my sister and father had seen many years prior. It was the "Harrier In Action" book. I was very familiar with Harriers and many different types of aircraft being a model kit builder almost exclusively of 1:48 scale. I had completely forgot about the incident but seeing artwork of the Harrier, reminded of it. I looked in the book for an explanation of it, and remembered that prototype military aircraft were painted white with orange highlights for higher visibility during flight testing. The reason the aircraft was over that road in 1969 I learned was that the US Marines were very interested in the AV-8 Harrier for its VTOL capabilities. McDonnell Douglas had been partnering with Hawker Siddley to purchase Harriers from the British. The aircraft floating over the highway was being tested, and scaring the shit out of my older sister. And setting her my father and I and probably numerous witnesses up for unwanted mockery from our family members when we told the tale.

I had to replay it multiple times to re-experience the amazement. They even added a "Most replayed" section (nicely done).

"float like a butterfly Sting like a bee" Applies well on this plane

@sirahmad

4 ай бұрын

lol exactly

@sigma_frenchie4075

4 ай бұрын

A bee dies when stinging what do you mean by that

@shaunroland8053

4 ай бұрын

@sigma_frenchie4075 Muhammed Ali

Incoming Aviation Engineers from the University of KZread comment sections tells you how bad the F-35 is

@mayankmishra1186

4 жыл бұрын

copywriter hahaha

@BaguetteGamingOfficial

4 жыл бұрын

But it's really not that good lol

@mayankmishra1186

4 жыл бұрын

@@BaguetteGamingOfficial rocket scientist spotted.

@BaguetteGamingOfficial

4 жыл бұрын

@@mayankmishra1186 yes thanks to my 2 months of youtube studying I am now an expert on the field

@mayankmishra1186

4 жыл бұрын

@@BaguetteGamingOfficial i never knew lockheed martin is running such educational programs on youtube.

1960s: Dreams of a VTOL supersonic fighter 2010s: Complains about a VTOL supersonic fighter

@urbanmidnight1

5 жыл бұрын

Dreams? Over in the UK we had VTOL in the 60s 😂

@weak1ings

5 жыл бұрын

@@urbanmidnight1 please read carefully, I said VTOL SUPERSONIC fighter :) The Harrier jet is not supersonic, as impressive as it is!

@riot2136

5 жыл бұрын

Gaand Faad News hahahah

@memo4148

5 жыл бұрын

Search: YAK-141

@therealfumanchu

5 жыл бұрын

Phạm Thọ only 4 built used for tests

I'm proud to say I work supporting these birds!

This aircraft is being used at this time regularly. Awesome! I remember when it was first taking to the air…seemed so futuristic. Reminded me of the cartoon the Jetson’s!

0:40 F-35B: I have to go now. My planet needs me.

@Sedlo64

3 жыл бұрын

Planet America

@BenitoakaDuce

2 жыл бұрын

And than get killed by a random ww2 yak 9 cuz usa planes sucks

@zainjav

2 жыл бұрын

@@BenitoakaDuce You’re either willfully ignorant or extremely uninformed

@BenitoakaDuce

2 жыл бұрын

@@zainjav ahahahha lol don t u think the f 35 is the best jet? If u think this its clear the amrrican propaganda reach u already sry dude but i don t talk with jerks.

@zainjav

2 жыл бұрын

@@BenitoakaDuce I never said anything about the f35. Look at all the other standards in military aviation that have come out of the United States, the f16 being one of many examples.

“JUMPJET”

@69thalienfrommars25

3 жыл бұрын

GTA sa

@wilevx

3 жыл бұрын

A man of culture i see

@affinix887

3 жыл бұрын

Ahhahaa

@subhajitkarmakar291

3 жыл бұрын

Best comment! It brings back so many memories.

@alphahead2741

3 жыл бұрын

Actually the hydra jet from gta sa and gta v are taking from a av-8b harrier jet, not the f35b

This is beautiful. Thank you Lockheed.

I love how it slowly jumps airborne, and slowly lands

Helicopters: Am I joke to you???? F35 : Am I Helicopter to you??? 😑

@readytodie7355

5 жыл бұрын

Boring joke...

@burningash6426

5 жыл бұрын

This is the best joke I've for heard for so long

@readytodie7355

5 жыл бұрын

@@bodhisattwamondal4969 No.

@readytodie7355

5 жыл бұрын

@@bodhisattwamondal4969 Umm... no

@mohdfairozlanahmadtarmizi6430

5 жыл бұрын

Boeing joke ...

World: you can be whatever you want F-35b: i want to be a helicopter! World: wait what?

@lowquality6713

4 жыл бұрын

Not the first or second time a plane said this

@Alvin-yp4dv

4 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂

@justjeremy441

4 жыл бұрын

@@indianjudge5860 no I hate that.

@nikelinq2899

4 жыл бұрын

Funny. Laughed.

@yapflipthegrunt4687

3 жыл бұрын

More like F35b:I want to be a stealth Harrier!

It was a blessing to be part of the JSF ITF at Pax River!!

@lethabrooks9112

9 ай бұрын

I was born at Pax River...My dad was an aircraft mechanic in the Navy.

Excellent idea and development. Loved it.

Had they told the public, "You're gonna fucking love this thing, it's gonna float magically and shit, and take off straight up and down. Pretty badass shit." It wouldn't have been such a controversial development.

@JeffKomarow

7 жыл бұрын

exactly!

@theshinygoldenemperor2422

7 жыл бұрын

Thing is, it won't. It can only VTOL with half a fuel load and no weapons, so.

@Karuiko

7 жыл бұрын

It is marketed as a STOVL. The only people who call it a VTOL are probably uneducated in the fact it can't do a proper vertical takeoff.

@theshinygoldenemperor2422

7 жыл бұрын

+Karuiko It was meant to be VTOL but it isn't. So they changed how they market it. It's meant to replace the harrier

@warhamer-ne8mi

6 жыл бұрын

Protoman lol

they copied the design from GTA San Andreas

@mango_tgo8361

5 жыл бұрын

MashedPixels r/woooosh

@carcinogenicthalidomide3057

5 жыл бұрын

@@harrapanman621 boards?

@jaibhardwaj4886

5 жыл бұрын

@@carcinogenicthalidomide3057 mai bhi 10th mai!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

@user-zo9ye6de5e

5 жыл бұрын

@@carcinogenicthalidomide3057 physics kaisa raha?

@user-zo9ye6de5e

5 жыл бұрын

@@jaibhardwaj4886 to padhai kar esab mat dek

Fighter jets & vertical landing & taking ofd : unbelievable Thanks for posting ❤️

@WilliNelson-sx9vj

6 ай бұрын

Recommended such as nuclear gasoline like USS Navy as usual, in order to be efficient for landing & vice versa

Breaking news, planes are now sentient and are gaining schizophrenia to think they are helicopters

@shinyy8918

Жыл бұрын

This jet simply identifies as an attack helicopter

0:44 thats how stuff use to fly in 90's movies.

@raymartcarreon6069

3 жыл бұрын

Harriers been made awhile ago tho

@raymartcarreon6069

3 жыл бұрын

Some planes in that ear already have VTOL

@yashdeepkeer6937

3 жыл бұрын

Go and see yak 41 m made by ussr . Fir pata chaelga f35 kaha se aya hai

@Joshua_N-A

3 жыл бұрын

Harry Tasker cleaning up the 20th floor.

@melonsmodelairplanes8496

3 жыл бұрын

@@yashdeepkeer6937 yes i agree , par kuch ussr ki planes bhi usa ka copy hai

A masterpiece of engineering... Good job, Lockheed Martin...

@raymondchiu7582

2 жыл бұрын

Powered by Pratt & Whitney

@harrier331

Жыл бұрын

The lift system that allows the aircraft to fly verically is a Rolls Royce development.

@georgeqzzy1468

Жыл бұрын

@@raymondchiu7582 both the swivel nozzle and lift fan is Rolls Royce…

@TerrorSab

Жыл бұрын

​@georgeqzzy1468 nope, Google who makes the engine, the F135 engine. Pratt

@IHeighway

10 ай бұрын

and bae systems??

These test pilots are brave AF. I know there's an ejection seat, but damn that must take some testicular fortitude.

The amount of energy required for landing and take-off in F-35Bs is insane compared to runway counterparts....however awesome I would love to see the consumption in both ...

@2goober4u

6 ай бұрын

High bypass ratio gives it a very good fuel efficiency without acterburner

2012: Helipad on the skyscrapers 2020: F35Bpad on the skyscrapers

@Ghakimx

4 жыл бұрын

GTA 5 Online basically.

@nikelinq2899

4 жыл бұрын

@Indian judge Please stop copying and pasting that piece of shit joke on any comment involving a helicopter.

@dkgoutham3844

4 жыл бұрын

Unfortunately its Corona time

@i0nlz

4 жыл бұрын

@@Ghakimx P-996 Lazer pad (Or hydra)

@albundy316

4 жыл бұрын

1970: First in the world VTOL aircraft - Yak-38, made in USSR. 😂

1:32 Car: alright imma head out.

@d.a.nicholaus

4 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

@_Hyunism

3 жыл бұрын

Lmao

@ally4706

3 жыл бұрын

it looks like its photoshopped lol

@Bankable2790

3 жыл бұрын

It’s crazy how small that van looks comparatively and it is in the foreground.

It is much more complex than it looks. Many many flips and flops during computer simulation during design. Amazing engineering.

@AndyMcGeever

5 ай бұрын

They should have called round to Hawker Siddeley for a cup of tea and a chat. We had this shit sorted out 70 years ago. No computers, no simulation.. just British engineering prowess.

I watch this every now and again and it still amazes me, good ish lockheed.

Thanks for showing me in my recommendations after *6 years*

@teafool753

3 жыл бұрын

Now it's 7

@davidnassif5114

3 жыл бұрын

Ya 7 for me too

@shivankursharma7999

3 жыл бұрын

Hello Dr. Sehgal...😂😂

@shubhamsehgal2336

3 жыл бұрын

@@shivankursharma7999 haan bhai bol

We’re getting closer to TIE Fighters and X-wings

@ef-5tornado495

4 жыл бұрын

And lightsabers, next time you look outside there might be a xyston class Star destroyer outside waiting to blow up earth

@luaerve

4 жыл бұрын

Yes, gundam will be there too

@ef-5tornado495

3 жыл бұрын

Lana 2000 ?

@weaponizedlizardmen360

3 жыл бұрын

@@Artonix2000 stupitest? Would you like to try again?

@kylerwright3341

3 жыл бұрын

@@ef-5tornado495 to get a “real life lightsaber” we would need an insane power source to work as the kyber crystal

Worked on the engineering, this is the old version, the fan lid is reversed, if something went wrong and the pilot had to eject he would be sucked into the fan. It was changed with the fan hinge being positioned right behind the pilot.

MF turned on creative mode

F-35 in 2013: Did Vertical Takeoff Me in 2020: Still can't Takeoff

@omshree2448

3 жыл бұрын

@Hunter Hebert well, to be honest, neither am I and probably nor he is.

@xUltimatexInstinctx

3 жыл бұрын

@Joe. Biden have you done real research on the f-35?

@seantaggart7382

3 жыл бұрын

@Joe. Biden well hey it takes time to make a good aircraft

@nevize6660

3 жыл бұрын

@Joe. Biden you forgot?

@harryo1948

3 жыл бұрын

You will, dw😊

Imagine how much fuel that takes to do...

@marble25

5 жыл бұрын

probably close to a ton every minute.

@MayankSingh-qg4zv

5 жыл бұрын

200 metric ton per second Edit : understand sarcasm

@marble25

5 жыл бұрын

it's not small. has a maximum takeoff weight of 27 tons. about 9 tons being the fuel. by close to a ton I meant several hundred kilograms.

@MayankSingh-qg4zv

5 жыл бұрын

@@marble25 so based on your previous comments .... F-35 max flight time is a minute ..... Well I m really proud of my old MiG s yeah it's synonymous to flying coffin and boutique plane but it can run for hours.

@drumking241

5 жыл бұрын

Yep, thats why they dont take off vertically with a full load, and/or weapons, always full standard take off, or short vertical take off, (saves gas) but i did see a scenario in an article once written by former miltary planner say in a contested area with no fob for aircraft, but air dominance is had they could use parking lots for short hops, and to take off climb out and meet a tanker, until a suitable fob can be made, that would be awesome, because lets be honest seeing an F-35 or future fighter complete a mission from a parking lot with no runway is just awesome to think about

Some people claiming that it's doing insane amounts of calculations to stay level. It's a simple gyro reading that the flight controller interprets to how much power gets sent to each thrust nozzle.

Neat. Did we ever fix the “almost slammed it into the tarmac” thing? Noticed it on a few carrier landings as well.

Kinda cool seeing the thrusters vectoring in action

0:41 felling sad for the patch of runway.

@jacobrzeszewski6527

3 жыл бұрын

@ОСЬМИНОГ - ШОУ How is a MiG 2 times better? It has a lot of different features, but like any plane there are trade offs. I’m personally excited to see what this jet can do.

@EternalShadow1667

3 жыл бұрын

@ОСЬМИНОГ - ШОУ like, no, not really. They aren’t that much better. And frankly, I don’t think anyone who cares for their country in the world would want the Russian influence attached to the purchase. Note to people who like democracy

@shahnazfiaz2015

3 жыл бұрын

@@EternalShadow1667 lots of countries in Asia use russian tech. Turkey being a major example when it made orders for s400 units when US refused to let it purchase patriot systems.

I didn't know that there is a VTO variant. What an amazing bit of engineering.

@Lee_303

Жыл бұрын

For just one reason it replaces the Harrier jump jet. The lift off is a bit gimmicky but being able to land on Naval carriers without hitting the side or running off the end must be a god send. The Navy carry out more planned, precision strikes & a stealth jet that can see over the horizon with VTOL is great for that.

No freaking way. This was absolutely amazing to see

0:31 Me when I realise I have to do things

@bumrbk3246

4 жыл бұрын

What do you mean doge please tell me I'm literally shaking rn

@proplayer-sc8xt

4 жыл бұрын

Are u f 35?

@suspiciouschicken

4 жыл бұрын

Nothing specific just T H I N G S

@sussy.gaming6969

4 жыл бұрын

@@proplayer-sc8xt LOL

@th3osl333

4 жыл бұрын

So you just get high

*Nothing* *keep scrolling down...*

@aj1nonly

5 жыл бұрын

Fuck you bitch you made my day😂😂😂😂😂😂

@SlimShady-xi7wl

5 жыл бұрын

BaiKO 😶😂

@MayankSingh-qg4zv

5 жыл бұрын

Okay

@tobiashorowitz9676

5 жыл бұрын

BaiKO lol

@giraffeman326

5 жыл бұрын

BEST. COMMENT. EVER.

The way it just lifted up like a UFO. Keep it up, Lockheed!

VTOL planes remain the coolest thing since learning about them as a kid watching true lies in 94

I can never understand people saying that the f35 and f22 are unnecessary... russia, china, and even Japan and India are developing 5th generation stealth fighters. Should we just not develop 5th generation stealth fighters as well? I admit, their development was horrendous and the costs are exorbitant. But this is because no one has made a 5th generation stealth fighter before, especially with vtol (LOL). It makes me laugh how some people think making the f22 and f35 should have been a piece of cake. The fact that the f22 is the only combat operations 5th generation stealth fighter to have even flown missions is a testament to the advantages of not falling behind in fighter technologies, and being a leader.

@iii5169

6 жыл бұрын

Joh1002mm hah fuck off, Russia made 3 5th generation fighters, Su47, Mig1.44 and Yak141 during 1990s, when USA didn't even develop F22 prototype , and now Russia has Su57, it gone late because of USSR collapse and economy crisis, it's all fine now and Russia will reply every American fighter by creating it's own new Russian equivalent the Yak141 designs were sold to Lockheed Martin and they made the JSF Programme which is now the F35, the Americans have copied the Russian tech and you little fuck giving us some history lessons? go learn yourself kid

@dionjeremy1711

6 жыл бұрын

I work on the ec130 a aircraft that is over 30 yrs olds and there is a ton of top secret capabilities I'm not allowed to know about unless it's needed for my job.The f35 is less than a decade old highly advanced and lockhead Martin contractors do most of the in depth maintenance.There is a ton of things we don't know about this aircraft.Unless you actually work on the aircraft your opinion is equal to nothing considering half the people on Don't even work on aircraft in general.

@ryancrow2876

6 жыл бұрын

Sariel Reigns Сариэль Царствует su57 production was just cancelled dummy. finally realized how behind the f35 they really are.

@THEFIRSTCRAZYGAMER

5 жыл бұрын

Joh1002mm stop acting like a nerd no one likes it

@nameunko

5 жыл бұрын

Know the difference between 4.5 and full on 5th gen dumbfuck. @@iii5169

JUMPJET and pressing Numericals for vertical take off, CJ did long ago

@darkseid1358

2 жыл бұрын

that was sea harrier old vtol jet!

Man! Is there a way to get tired of this video??? This is so f. pretty... love aircraft engineering.

VTOL is so cool. I remember seeing the Harrier as a kid, it dropped my jaw.

1:33 I did NOT realize the size of the plane before seeing that car wow

@respeare9177

3 жыл бұрын

I did not realize the size of the car before seeing that plane wow

@geniusmarcsays2434

3 жыл бұрын

there was a man at 0:12

@AtomiK-XIX-Bit

3 жыл бұрын

@@geniusmarcsays2434 there is a man in the plane

@kennyc9662

3 жыл бұрын

You do realize that van is in the foreground right?

@OtherDalfite

3 жыл бұрын

@@kennyc9662 I'm not familiar with film. Shouldn't the van being in the foreground make it appear much larger in comparison to the plane in the background? Unless the plane really is huge. At 0:12, it really doesn't appear to be that big, but the van makes it look huge.

I saw an amazing Herrier demo in '78. Most likely one of the first AV-8's.

Seen either one of these or a different one hovering over the treeline next to my house and zoomed away. Was neat.

looks like an alien-spaceship

you did a great job on creating this masterpiece

@nuvis1000

3 жыл бұрын

you better take time to admire it because he was already deadborn

@HamuelPter

Жыл бұрын

thanks

Hats off to the engineers who built this marvelous flying machine. Bravo

OH, MAN! WHAT AN IMPRESSIVE PIECE OF AMERICAN ENGINEERING AT 1:31 ! Edit: how does no one realize that I was talking about the van as a joke?

@stephendorrington8962

5 ай бұрын

The Harrier jumpjet vtol aircraft, an English invention/piece of engineering entered service with the Royal Airforce, on the 1st April 1969, some 44 years before the Lockheed plane.

@skyjaythefirst7331

5 ай бұрын

​@@stephendorrington8962You didn't catch onto the joke about the random van driving by.

I need one of these for morning rush hour…. No more excuses for being late though 😂

And there it is. the most expensive thing in the history of things.

@wadopotato33

8 жыл бұрын

+Docktor Jim Not even close...

@MEKNISMBEATZ

8 жыл бұрын

+Docktor Jim B2 bomber is more expensive than an f-35

@riparianlife97701

8 жыл бұрын

MEK'N'ISM BEATZ Fewer built. They actually serve a purpose, as well. The F-35 can't carry enough bombs far enough to be a serious bomber, and there's no such thing as a dog fight any more.

@MEKNISMBEATZ

8 жыл бұрын

Docktor Jim I was just answering your question "the most expensive thing"

@riparianlife97701

8 жыл бұрын

MEK'N'ISM BEATZ Well, as a program, the F35 costs a lot more. More units, each of them not particularly useful.

Say what you will about VTOL, I think it's pretty nifty.

@Pyramid1974

8 жыл бұрын

+aviatorEngineer I have not seen vertical take off.. just vertical liftoff and hover... do you know of any clips on here that show the f35 taking forward flight after vertical liftoff? If you know of any would you be willing to copy n paste the url here pls? I am really curious.. there are a lot of clips on here but none that I have seen show actual forward takeoff into flight from a hovering state after vertical liftoff... thx frien~

@Mech780

8 жыл бұрын

+KMurdock1974 I think that is still impossiable because it needs speed to get the lift on the wings,when they would try to forward fly,aircraft would probably stall and crash.

@vihurah9554

8 жыл бұрын

+Kico Horvat not nessesarily, look at the second engine stage, it probably a gradual shift to forward flight to maintain Vtol

@Mech780

8 жыл бұрын

+!〈VihurahDaGamer〉! I know,but I have yet to see IT going forward after VT

@njsullyalex2744

8 жыл бұрын

I haven't found any such video, but I tried it in Flight Simulator, and it was able to transition from vertical to horizontal flight fine.

bought this off on gta

Adult with no imagination: planes don’t takeoff like that, silly kid! Future engineer: bet!

I saw this jet at an airshow once and it was surprisingly a lot quieter than most of the other jets

So it can take off vertically. Neat!

@hiteshadhikari

4 жыл бұрын

No it cant, practically

I remember playing with Herriers in red alert 2 back in 2000, and yet this technology has been around all the way back from the 1960's :)

pov: you see someone hacking in a game

Even in 2019 this is BADASS

All you F-35 haters sound just like the F-16 haters back in the day. Now everybody loves the "legendary" F-16. The F-35 will be exceptional at its job. You all will eat your words a decade from now so let me be the first to say "I told you so"...

@barnaulishe

10 жыл бұрын

decade

@theoriginalmikee

10 жыл бұрын

Really? Saying the F-35 "will be exceptional" without any proof of performance or combat use isn't accurate, at all. The F-16 was a rather successful design, while the F-35 was developed strictly to become a cash cow for Lockheed and the MIC.

@peterwilson5528

7 жыл бұрын

Ha,ha, ha hilarious humour. What words will we eat? The opposite will be true in your old age you will eat your words.

@ami6272

6 жыл бұрын

FrakU2 For now, enjoy having zero government support to its citizens since all of the money is going in this garbage plane!

@fishytails6639

6 жыл бұрын

In simulated fights between the F-35 and the F-16 the F-16 had a win rate of almost 100%. Im sorry, but if the new, incredibly expensive Plane cant even beat the one it is supposed to replace you can not really talk about a "exceptional job"

Seen one being tested passing Lockheed Martin years back no one believed I saw a jet hovering in mid air

The start of a legend

Vertical is the best way to take off Gas: Hold my bill

@ES_Spotter

3 жыл бұрын

Aviation fuel*

Love this plane. To be able to stop on a dime, i reckon this is the best F35

I’m so glad that all 6729 commenters who just happen to be aerospace engineers or fighter pilots explaining why this video is fake/stupid

I know this technology is around for years. However it's always amazing to see it. It's kinda like seeing a space craft from star wars take off. Only that this is a real aircraft.

Getting strong "My people need me" vibes from this.

I had no idea the F-35 could do vert take off? I now respect this plane a lot more than I used to

@LizardYup

5 жыл бұрын

The B variant is capable of VTOL, A and C variants aren't

@TheRedKing247

5 жыл бұрын

That's basically the entire reason it's so expensive is the VTOL capability of the B variant. Thing is it is a pretty huge advantage because it means we can use STOVL carriers rather than CATOBAR supercarriers to launch planes, but we still do have the A and C variants for normal take offs. People rag on this plane too much.

@hoghogwild

5 жыл бұрын

@@TheRedKing247 The F-35B can only do a low fuel and no stores VTO, for operations/combat it's a STOVL aircraft.

@TheRedKing247

5 жыл бұрын

@@hoghogwild Thats why I said STOVL carriers

@hoghogwild

5 жыл бұрын

@@TheRedKing247 You said "is the VTOL capability of the B variant" which for combat it does not possess. Though if they simply required to ferry a jet from one carrier to another, or from a carrier to a close by land base or vice-versa, they could use that limited VTOL capability with low fuel loading and no internal/external stores in place..

I can't even begin to imagine the engineering complexity of that thing

y r people disliking it, its amazing

0:44 **harry potter theme intensifies**

@vaxton

5 жыл бұрын

AJHHAHDFGHDAFHDFGHADFHADFGHDFHDGF

@kleinemaus6094

4 жыл бұрын

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH

@smeh1967

4 жыл бұрын

@@vaxton r/hadastroke

@nahuelc.9551

4 жыл бұрын

HAGAGSHAHHSHSHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHSGAGSHJDIXHWHSIZUSBWUHAHAHAHAHHAHAVWVW DDVJ2IJE8EDJBWHAHAHAHHAGAH

@OG-vb1pl

4 жыл бұрын

Susssosഅംഒഒഞൊഝനൊചഝഠഥങഛഥശചഥ

“Hey Doc you might wanna back up we don’t have enough room to take off” “Runway? Where we’re going we don’t need runway”

@ReversedTech

3 жыл бұрын

Legendary comment, gotta love Back to the future

theres something cursed but also amazing about seeing a fighter jet floating being suspended by nothing but air

The guy in that minivan at the end just witnessed a miracle

Lockheed Martin, "What should we make next?" ???....," An Amphibious Fighter Aircraft."

@boingobadger9846

3 жыл бұрын

@@beastman1927 which aircraft?

@submarinoflotador4532

3 жыл бұрын

@@boingobadger9846 This

Outstanding machine .Outstanding aviators.The outcome is unexceptionable air superiority.Hats off

I really thought hover planes were only science-fiction until they said the one in GTA is based off a real life plane

smooth like butter