Келесі
- 4:52
- 13 М.
- 00:27
- 10 МЛН
- 15 күн бұрын
- 00:26
- 14 МЛН
- 13 күн бұрын
- 00:24
- 63 МЛН
- 15 күн бұрын
- 00:36
- 4,3 МЛН
- 13 күн бұрын
- 8:15
- 1,2 МЛН
- 11:24
- 27 М.
- 6:14
- 40 М.
- 4:58
- 13 М.
- 19:36
- 28 М.
- 4:51
- 11 М.
- 7:07
- 38 М.
- 17:55
- 3,1 М.
- 0:20
- 64 МЛН
- 1:00
- 8 МЛН
- 0:37
- 353 М.
- 0:44
- 28 МЛН
Пікірлер: 37
Great work explaining your indications. I'm learning a lot from your videos. Thanks
@garathbester
2 жыл бұрын
You are very welcome! I will upload some more soon
Fantastic video man, keep up the good work
@garathbester
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much! That means a lot
thank you very much sir. i' m learning a lot of your videos sir. i hope u can explain & make more videos like this.
Nice
Wonderful sir.. Nice explaination..
@garathbester
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
Thanks for video🙏 i'm from Borneo,Sarawak
@garathbester
Жыл бұрын
You are very welcome, I hope it helped
Could you please share link of KIT you are using. I want to do similar demo on ultrasound image
Pls explain the. Lof echo pattern in weld scan
please do more linear defects identification. thanks for your work
@garathbester
Жыл бұрын
Is there any specific defect you have in mind?
@edeloo6578
Жыл бұрын
@@garathbester yes, the differences between slags and lack of side wall fusion. im just having a hard time to differentiate between the two of them. thank you
I am confused dude. You scanned the plate with a 45 but you have drawn out a 60??
@garathbester
Жыл бұрын
Apologies, seems like I miss spoke there, it was in fact a 60 degree probe
@nw8000
Жыл бұрын
@@garathbester No problem, Great video Can you do a video on Through wall height and depth please?
As from the video we get the direct defect indication but can you put a full video of pipe weld scanning of whole section as how to distinguish between a back wall and LOF echo
@garathbester
2 жыл бұрын
That's a great idea, I will add it in.
I thought you detected your indications with 45 degree probe
Why you don't count (skip distance + index point) for plotting?
@garathbester
2 жыл бұрын
Hi there Fransisco, I do. When I measured my surface distance to the center line of the weld, I measure from the beam index on my probe (as opposed to taking the reading from my UT set). This way I do not have to do some extra math when plotting.
Make more video🙏 Scan nozzle or TKY
@garathbester
Жыл бұрын
Sure thing
Weld scan and 6b drop technique on video please
@garathbester
2 жыл бұрын
Great idea! Will do!
Hello sir please make more videos
@garathbester
2 жыл бұрын
I am thinking of making some theory videos, what do you think?
@endeavour1094
2 жыл бұрын
@@garathbester yes sir theory in short and practical according to EN 9712 as this video's are not available on internet.
Half beam profile how to draw sir
@garathbester
Жыл бұрын
Hi there, I actually have a video about this here kzread.info/dash/bejne/rItqttdpmMzUYLg.html
Sir, pipe thickness 6.4 mm, dia 4".ut testing half skip catch one defect sir, but defect beam bath full beambath is coming, why is this happening, sir 70 degree probe use sir true angle 69 degree, but defect half skip and depth ok sir but beam bath only high full beam bath coming sir. Why sir. Please tell me sir
@garathbester
Жыл бұрын
Hi there Allwin, I am sorry but it is difficult to know the exact problem you are facing. With those dimensions, is it possible to request an RT? The thickness and probe rock will make scanning that quite challenging.
Sry to tell that the vedio name is( identification of slag) but the flaw is crack
@garathbester
9 ай бұрын
Ah yeah thanks for that
@yashgamers9608
9 ай бұрын
@@garathbester thank you to sir