Thank you Dr. Saab for introducing the concepts of feminist theory very simply and clearly

As a first year student, this lecture was perfectly explained, thank you so much, be blessed for your time

Finally I found a place on you tube that explains feminism in an intelligent and objective manner. Indeed it is evolving and branching out like a living tree. I see that this has not received any positive attention. That concerns me. Thank you so much for this presentation.

Thank you mam, its for the First time m learning about this and it remained very helpful the way u described in a simple way.

Thanks mam for this very informative lecture. Best part is the slides shown with explanation which helps to make notes while understanding lecture

very descriptive way of conducting whole information impresively...likable...thumbs up ma'am.....but the only issue is its tooo long to be in front of screen for almost 1 hour..... thanks by core of my heart from Pakistan.

Thank you mam for the important and excellent lecture

This was very educational, thank you so much..... It amazes me why some men are against feminism... according to this women never tried to be men nor do they want to make men inferior, they just want gender equity. What's so bad about that🤦‍♀️

Thank u mam. U cleared up many questions of mine

Thank uhh ma'am for the amazing lecture

madam such nice explanation as you want to impart all u have

Very great mam

Thank you mam it's very usefull and help me a lot in my xam preparation.thank you

Great thoughts of feminism

I'm here to know about Elaine Showalter's feminist criticism in the wilderness. Is it relevant?

Mary Wollstonecraft's A Vindication of the Rights of Women was published in 1792, not 1972.

Very informative, thank you ma'am.

Your videos are very informative.Can you please suggest some important works on feminism?

4:14 most farmers and fishermen are men. They grow/catch almost all of the raw material that women use to produce most of the food.

Nice information about feminism

Thank you so much mam ❤️

Very good presentation but not discussed New York Red Square declaration.

One correction: In 1966, it wasn't Betty Friedman who started National Organization for Women. It was Betty Friedan.

@insearchofself9616

4 жыл бұрын

Check 26:11, its just a typo. Very easy to pick on others huh?

thanks for this !!

Does this doctor teach English literature or what? She is a good Doctor thank you so much

Exactly what i needed. Thx alot.

@ashayadav-ep7fp

8 жыл бұрын

Did u observe other theories related to feminists identity ?

@SunilYadav-ol6cz

8 жыл бұрын

No, actually this lecture builds the basic idea about main theories. Please share with me in case you have more detailed docs for same . Thx in advance!

@ashayadav-ep7fp

8 жыл бұрын

yeah sure....m collecting info on d topic feminists identity right now

@SunilYadav-ol6cz

8 жыл бұрын

pls share on sunil.ies51@gmail.com thx :D

Can some one tell me how does ecofeminism differ from radical and liberal feminist theory? I need some ideas for my research paper please, thanks!

@Livingalonediaries23

7 жыл бұрын

Ecofeminism deals with the study of binary between men and women influenced by nature and culture debate so men are considered as culture and women as nature, underlying notion is that culture always dominates the nature. also, there are some terms that used in society to denote the earth or land which are similar for the women like - Berrian land or fertile land, rape of the land. The reproduction process is something where women considered as similar to land. Whereas in Radical the argument says that inequality between men and women is the result of patriarchal setup and men are the real cause behind the social dominance of women. The liberal feminist focus on achieving the equality between men and women by focusing on individual possession of autonomy. It's more an Individualistic perspective. (I know this is too late, but just trying to help)

@missaliyamughal9662

5 жыл бұрын

it may be too late but helpful for the successors maam. efforts are to be valued.thanks

Thanku mam

26:10 this slide has wrong years. Wonder why the professor didn’t notice.

10:40 A Vindication of the rights of women 1792 26:16 A Vindication of the rights of women 1972 Please clarify

@samirabouyachi4432

2 жыл бұрын

It's 1792 which symbolised the first wave of feminism

@Demonoflaplace

2 жыл бұрын

@@samirabouyachi4432 If you have any notes on feminist theories in social science pls share

@preetigee

Жыл бұрын

It was 1792! Sad to see such a major error.

thank ma'am

HERESY!!! HERESY EVERYWHERE!!!

Noticed how whenever you hear a feminist talk it's always about her feelings and emotions. And completely ignores reason, logic, facts, evidence, statistics, data, personal accountability and most importantly common sense!

Thank you

9:23

this lecture has become old. Concept and meaning of feminism has changed!

The women of the w

2:50 voting rights were given to people with power and responsibility. Voting rights have a lot more to do with share of responsibility than gender.

Honestly, the lady has no idea how to speak. "Men and women are different, biologically and physically. But fundamentally there should be no difference." What the heck is that supposed to mean?

@avni1114

6 жыл бұрын

the heck it is supposed to mean is that what's inside a man's pants and what's inside a woman's pants is different but it shouldn't be of any concern to the government or the society

@sheebaaslam

6 жыл бұрын

@faisalahmed-oo6jr

6 жыл бұрын

Rahul Rathnakumar If you don't understand 'what the heck' it's supposed to mean then you are an imbecile... Still, I'll do you the kindness... It means one's gender should be of no consideration when it comes to how individuals are treated in society... However I doubt you can even grasp this basic concept

There is no right in Vedic period for women.

@tourofindia4761

2 жыл бұрын

U are wrong bro. Plz try to learn about vedic period.

Hindi hota to aur a66a hota

I am not against feminism but she sounds a bit biased or prejudiced.

@lavendersingh4214

6 жыл бұрын

Gaurav Dobhal she should Bro, we’re in India!

@faisalahmed-oo6jr

6 жыл бұрын

You delusional idiot... This isn't America... This is India where some women are still lynched for imaginary crimes like witch craft

@floranewberry

5 жыл бұрын

Maybe you need to go back and study the definition of prejudice. She is talking about what has already happened, not pre-judging.

@tourofindia4761

2 жыл бұрын

@@floranewberry mam is right. Some people with low iq say wrong about mam. They are from india or pakistan.

hahahaahhahaah, but a good one guys...

Half cooked wisdom..Read the books properly