Nice comparison!😄🤩😎👌

@qwerty_waffle

6 ай бұрын

i keep seeing u everywhere

both of them are really great though

so one's differently pitched? is that the major difference or is there more?

@traumatizedgeworth

8 ай бұрын

it starts and ends slightly differently, causing popping for furnace

Thank you very much for sharing.

Ciekawy eksperyment, moim zdaniem akurat tutaj to FamiTracker wygrywa

@sl3dz214

4 ай бұрын

Prawda

@daxmasterix

3 ай бұрын

Did you cat sleep on your keyboard?

@pixigemthedumbass

3 ай бұрын

​@@daxmasterixnah, pretty sure hes polish

@FurryCuddler

18 күн бұрын

aaaaaah renard from lapfoxtrax pfp!!!!

@Orzeczenie.

18 күн бұрын

@@FurryCuddler hello

This chip is insane, it wasn't playing music like this at the time due to CPU limitations, this chip alone can do a lot, and this cover is wonderful, my childhood in LAN houses in Brazil was worth it, and you're really crazy to be able to do something so sinister in the furnace, congratulations man!!

Is the furnace comparison being done with puNES? Becaue you csn change the emulation to nsfplay for better results

@poznanskiszybkowiec_official

6 ай бұрын

Yes, it is. And apparently Furnace emulates DPCM in such a way, that sample rate actually matters when converting PCM .wav samples into DPCM standard. FamiTracker doesn't have this feature, and i'm not complaining about it... I think Furnace wants to be a real hardware-based music tracker... 😅

now make one from famitracker and famistudio

@ERRORRubiksZeraBrand

3 ай бұрын

who is in the famistudio team?

Furnace is the future.

@poznanskiszybkowiec_official

6 ай бұрын

If Furnace implements the DPCM on 2A03 in such a way that would beat FamiTracker, then maybe. Who knows ;)

Famitracker better