For more info, check out this article about Fair Use: support.google.com/youtube/answer/6396261

@BabluKumar-mr4rw

Жыл бұрын

SB suw

@WinVR

Жыл бұрын

2nd

@rakeshchaurasiya7302

Жыл бұрын

Squad ,

@user-zc2mf9fw5e

Жыл бұрын

@@BabluKumar-mr4rw ชชชชชช

@Pennyrich01

Жыл бұрын

😊😮 💩 ppip

Understanding Quantum Physics is more easier than understanding Fair Use

@Y_fitness

3 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂😂

@JuzefaWingedCat

3 жыл бұрын

Cuz it is based on laws on nature. I dunno what fair use is based on, but certainly not logic

@shivmangalsingh8825

3 жыл бұрын

True bro😀😀😂. My video blocked on KZread .

@martinplayer2348

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah

@Rolando_Cueva

3 жыл бұрын

more easier

Don't let this distract you from the fact that companies can still false strike you

@veinteresting

4 жыл бұрын

True. Better remove any copyright videos and create original one.

@TechDunk

4 жыл бұрын

Yep... Sadly

@TrVlogs82

4 жыл бұрын

Right.

@DeadlockEntertainment

4 жыл бұрын

exactly. can and will!

@oneeyedphotographer

4 жыл бұрын

@@veinteresting if my video is entirely my own work, that doesn't prevent you from claiming otherwise.

Honestly the "Fair Use" laws and massive corporate lawyers have killed my creative spirit literally it's hard to do anything without getting demonetized.

@HDReMaster

Жыл бұрын

all my stuff is fair use under education and research, I'll have a successful business and a cool hobby at minumum

@prod._PNX

Жыл бұрын

man i feel the same 😶

@TCCHClips7

Жыл бұрын

They seriously kill people's creativity

@ModeratelyCool

9 ай бұрын

I don't care about being monetized. I just want to share my playlists...

@TheEpicAce

9 ай бұрын

I don't even care about monetization but I still wonder why videos that are clearly commentary which is under fair use get taken down just because KZread is hiring freaking ai to tell if the video deserves copyright in the first place. The whole system is corrupt like bruh!!!!

“Fair use protects you, but even if you do all these things, fair use probably doesn’t protect you”

@EricYoungVFX

5 ай бұрын

It amazing she can state that its a law twice and people still blame them lol. The law was intended to help people who WORKED on the original project. Examples are anyone who works on film sets, video games, or other entertainment that wants to put it on a reel or resume later down the line. IT WASN'T INVENTED to give youtubers rights to copy-paste and profit off of other peoples content exactly 40 years later....

Users: Can you please explain fair use KZread: Go to court

@xv12commander

4 жыл бұрын

They are such stupid cowards...

@underdogtv2855

4 жыл бұрын

Its not KZread its the U.S Government wants to solve everything with courts!

@teerasakchannel2309

4 жыл бұрын

เขาพูดอะไรอยากรู้จัง

@bailujen8052

4 жыл бұрын

KZread loses

@bailujen8052

4 жыл бұрын

@@underdogtv2855 give community guidelines strikes to judges and lawyers

The name of this video should have been "We will not take any responsibility whatsoever."

@MichaelGlennglennimages

3 жыл бұрын

ya get what ya pay for. I would cancel your youtube account and stop paying that subscription if i was you

@72vince27

3 жыл бұрын

Hahahaha "On God we ain't helping y'all"

@LunaticMode

3 жыл бұрын

however this is their platform still they involve in it. that why they do so many auto detect system about copyright.. . in simple word, they also want we to create completely new original video. but that also big problems for me croz lack of idea & shy to record myself. maybe i should record my cat dance "tiger show" later.. 😁😁😁👌

@thatguyyus7883

3 жыл бұрын

@@LunaticMode Problem with the auto detecting algorithms is that it also picks up content that really is fair use. Using copyrighted material in the spirit of fair use does create new original content. This process that YT has hurts the creation of original content.

@A_Short_History

3 жыл бұрын

And why would they?

User: KZread could you explain fair use. KZread: no, go to court for the details

@Farr50

Жыл бұрын

KZread is scared silly and they love to scare their users

@KeithsTVHD1

5 ай бұрын

lol

There are so many creators, like Thunderfoot, that constantly use copyrighted material and long clips in their videos, and claim fair use, but never have to take them down. I also see many people performing full covers of copyrighted music without their videos being taken down. I don't understand how this happens when it's so easy for others to get copyright strikes.

@dmarkoJones

Жыл бұрын

$$$$$

@sifisotwalamedia

Жыл бұрын

That sounds like corruption.

@nyx211

Жыл бұрын

KZread is run by bots and algorithms. The ones that figure out how to manipulate the system can easily get a pass.

@sifisotwalamedia

Жыл бұрын

@@nyx211 KZread is run by people. Algorithm does not discriminate

@bearllly1

Жыл бұрын

They make KZread a lot of money. "Case CLOSED!"

Thanks for letting us know that there's nothing fair about fair use.

@jeremiahk6937

2 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

@curtpittman1295

2 жыл бұрын

just see

@hilltheo3299

2 жыл бұрын

So true 😂😂

@jeremyzhu8885

2 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

@Loveyoursel__

2 жыл бұрын

😂🤣🤣😂😂

"KZread doesn't decide what's fair use - only a judge can do that." Ok...so then why would youtube take down a video without an order from a judge?

@kanikkakapuronly1367

2 жыл бұрын

Hahahahah🤣🤣

@jeremiahk6937

2 жыл бұрын

EXACTLY

@Wile1412

2 жыл бұрын

Because the compnay can be sued if they don't take down a video in a certian time frame, money basically.

@juhaseppala873

2 жыл бұрын

KZread will take it down, then you claim it is fair use, back and forth, and the end of that process you will have to go to court to defend our rights. But, that is the point almost all the fair use claims by the claimers are dropped and your video is restored.

@abramslion1

2 жыл бұрын

Why Would copyright even apply on KZread? why are policies like the three strike's implemented for copyright?. If there's no fair use applied on KZread any content should be fair gain.

I have no idea why KZread hasn't incorporated a revenue sharing system for copyrighted material based off of an algorithm that pays a certain percentage of a monetized video to the copyright holder based on how much was used! That would be a win-win for everyone!!!!

If only KZread didn’t use automated bots to always side with the copyright owners

@TheEpicAce

9 ай бұрын

Yeah, today my video got claimed when I was using an anime clip for commentary😂

@EricYoungVFX

5 ай бұрын

its hilarious you guys literally say "owners" and still get upset

@arpitshivhare217

Ай бұрын

True

"even if you use fair use content, you're not protected" thank you.

@SamSitar

4 жыл бұрын

that's the American viewpoint. YT staff in other countries (EU, SAC, and others) will say different things.

@teerasakchannel2309

4 жыл бұрын

Translated into Thai or not, I do not understand

@bailujen8052

4 жыл бұрын

Even copyright holders can damage their own brand

@user-iz9xk3kf3g

4 жыл бұрын

@@teerasakchannel2309 don't worry. those reading and understand English like us also not able to understand.

@LiMCRiMZ

4 жыл бұрын

@@user-iz9xk3kf3g correct.

- Why are you here ? - I killed my wife because she cheated on me, and you ? - I used a 10 seconds footage and i lost on court about fair use.

@FaizanKhalidofficial

4 жыл бұрын

wow lol

@SNMAXPRO

4 жыл бұрын

KZread dislike this

@Jaa_morant

4 жыл бұрын

Ok men need your help here.As i understood from your answer, if I am starting a channel which is GENERALLY about music(so i will tell the biorgaphy of an artist for instance,) can i use copyrighted content without any fears for BAN? And does yotube ban videos in which there is copyrighted music or only demonetize some of them?

@OmniphonProductions

4 жыл бұрын

@@Jaa_morant I recently had a one-man band cover of Hotel California removed...and received a warning that future complaints could result in disabling my channel altogether.

@Jaa_morant

4 жыл бұрын

@@OmniphonProductions thanx for the answer. Do you know anything about uing parts of other videos from youtube(maybe a few seconds) and parts of actual film in context of your video. Can youtube immideatly detect it and what are the consequenses ban or demonetization of its ok to use?

I have to say I do appreciate the extra requirements KZread has added for those trying to claim videos. Especially letting us know what the specific problem is when there is one. No one likes seeing that yellow $ or getting that claim email. Personally, I've found that "transformative" is the most important for video. And I never ever use any copyrighted music. There's so much copyright free and creative commons 0 music out there! I look forward to KZread putting in place even more creator-friendly strategies regarding Fair Use. The more transparency we get, the more creative we can be! It's starting to feel much less adversarial with, and again, it's much appreciated! Now, if I can just figure out how to get videos suggested 😉. Cheers

Understanding algebra and calculus is much more easier than understanding fair use

I have to admit that KZread makes it too easy to strike a channel, and zero consequences for a false claim lends itself to abuse.

@moandaindesigns

2 жыл бұрын

@Connor Welch not everyone has the option to go-to court. It is an expensive endeavour, and there is no guarantee you will get enough money to break even , if you win. It is KZread's responsibility IMHO. They made a system that is easily abused and have become complicit with it's abuse. There needs to be a built-in consequence for abuse. As it stands, I think KZread should be labeled an accessory on the cases that go-to Court. Maybe after that, KZread will reconsider the system in place.

@trickster2060

10 ай бұрын

Actually youtube ignores the real complaints, and then goes after those channels who do not deserve the strike

@nisoyl

7 ай бұрын

yeap 🙄

i wanna go back to the old days of KZread :(

@abramslion1

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah i know, but the past is gone, this is the present..

@awemanyfit

2 жыл бұрын

How was the old days of KZread like?

@WrathKing47

2 жыл бұрын

@@awemanyfit It was like the Wild West. • Less rules to worry about. • Videos prioritized entertainment before profit. • Your only restriction was your imagination. • Cat Videos and shitposts galore. • Let's plays were starting to emerge.

@Hepheat75

Жыл бұрын

Me too.

@remix4098

Жыл бұрын

@@WrathKing47 there’s never been a problem cat videos moron

It seems impossible to find real world examples of KZread videos that are and are not fair use. Even searching the US government's website for past court cases about fair use, there's only a tiny number of cases involving this. We need more examples to better defend our works

Making youtubers watch this is like the eye holding scene from A Clockwork Orange

So basically the “fair use” is *nonsense!*

@letiziareis.

3 жыл бұрын

Exactly! It is so confusing

@lezeptron2125

3 жыл бұрын

Ofc

@thatguyyus7883

3 жыл бұрын

Since only a judge can decide if something is fair use, bigger copyright holders just have to threaten lawsuits or demonitization in order to win. Fair use (or any American law, really) is only as fair as the amount of money in your pocket.

@lezeptron2125

3 жыл бұрын

@@thatguyyus7883 we want to talk to the yt manager

@ethangender

3 жыл бұрын

@@thatguyyus7883 exactly... mafia mafia...

youtube: can not determine whether or not something is fair use or not. Us: so why do you block our content anyway?

@13Omood

3 жыл бұрын

Because that’s just how DMCA law works. KZread is siding on the side of safety to prevent another lawsuit like the one from Viacom all those years ago.

@qntainmnt

3 жыл бұрын

@@13Omood smh. something needs to be done about this. all of the mainstream youtube celebrities need to unify for change.

@ThatMecha

3 жыл бұрын

"Fair Use" can truthfully only be determined in court. As a platform for media hosting and sharing youtube can be held liable for the content they are hosting. Hence why things are the way they are on the site. If things are going to change it has to be done on a legislative level first

@AlexDYM331

3 жыл бұрын

Rockeedee Is it okay to post a video of myself talking about another KZread video if I’m making no money off it and I react to screenshots of the video instead of that KZread video and put the screenshots in my own video?

@ThatMecha

3 жыл бұрын

@@AlexDYM331 That's something in the grey area. That's why the laws need to be cleared on these things

It really is time that this was standardised. How are we as creators supposed to do our work if we constantly get claims and strikes? I teach guitar. How am I supposed to teach a song that I'm not allowed to play? Even if I don't use the original video or audio and simply perform the piece myself, I still get copyright claims. This appears to be getting worse of late. Perhaps an Organisation the size of KZread could be doing more to protect creators rather than passing the buck? Frustrating to say the least.

@TDavsFavs

Жыл бұрын

Yes very annoying. I’m just trying to make a compilation but this stuff is so intimidating and I don’t feel protected

*Resume about this video be like* * KZread: It's not my problem

This made me even more confused and messed up my whole head. I don't think I'll understand it properly in my lifetime....

@angrydad8708

3 жыл бұрын

Don't worry. I don't get it either. LOL

@xyz-md4mj

2 жыл бұрын

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣same here bro. 👍👍👍👍👍

@shrmp5055

2 жыл бұрын

Shes like this is whats aloud but actually no

this doesn't explain why copyright holders are the ones who hold all the power regarding disputes. youtube's default "we dont decide fair use" statement is a convenient cop-out that absolves them of any responsibility to address a rampant issue of copyright abuse from big companies like UMG that's plagued the site for years.

@libertasaudits4965

Жыл бұрын

Currently all the so called fair use claimant has to do is claim fair use and then KZread restores the stolen video and the only other recourse is to take the person who stole it court.. We hold all the power? Only until the person who stole our video says they didn't by claiming fair us

@speedytruck

Жыл бұрын

They don’t. If they take down your video and you know you’re in the right, you can always file a lawsuit against them. Whether that’s worth it is up to you.

@EricYoungVFX

5 ай бұрын

because they are the owner.............. You guys don't seem to understand that this is LAW, not something youtube decides, as she stated twice.... "Fair use" was invented to help people who WORKED on a project to be allowed to use it later down the line. Think of all the people who work on film sets and want to clip it later for their reels, ect. It wasn't intended for people to just take other peoples work to improve their own.

@Fluffy6555

5 ай бұрын

​@@EricYoungVFXhow do you talk about a film without using clips from it?

@lurkerrekrul

2 ай бұрын

KZread doesn't decide anything, because no human looks at your claim/appeal. It's all done by A.I. routines. Google has worked very hard to insulate themselves from ever actually having to deal with the 'little people' who use their platforms and who create the content that make them profitable for Google. The only time a human gets involved is if a dispute garners negative media attention.

Sooo, basically, damned if you do, damned if you don't? Got it.

but I used a private video and a copyright happens

Imagine this getting copyrighted

@formeraccount1529

3 жыл бұрын

Emilol 1001 she’s copying a hairstyle, copySTRIKE

@Vectorlarity

3 жыл бұрын

Irony.

@MichaelGlennglennimages

3 жыл бұрын

This is actually covered by copyright and KZread can decide what use is allowed. So even KZread can go after thieves when they steal stuff.

The degree Google wants to be free of any potential responsibility is stunning

@Bhoomikasblog

2 жыл бұрын

Bhoomika 's blog

@emusic36000

Жыл бұрын

That's smart of them.

@C.G.Gaster

Жыл бұрын

It's understandable, but they bought youtube sooo

KZread: Go to court. Me: My dog stepped on a bee.

Im not even going to watch the video after I read the comments. These kind of videos from KZread are the true reason they disabled dislikes. It’s a shame how less they care about their creators. People put their love, life and soul into their channels just to get them false striked and possibly deleted.

True story: Paramount PR invited me to a screening of one of their Mission Impossible movies for review. I made a video talking about my thoughts on the movie and ranking the Mission Impossible movies using some of their trailers video edited over me talking and criticizing the movies. Years later Paramount claimed the video - I disputed through YT and said it should fall under fair use but Paramount responded with a manual rejection. I ended up just deleting the video since the views weren't so high but it's annoying when a company invites you to something for review - you make a review video and then they basically kill your video (even after praising the movie).

@YouTubeViewers

4 жыл бұрын

We know where you are coming from but sometimes it can be hard to understand why a rights owner has claimed your video, but that doesn’t mean they’re not authorized to do so. You can always dispute a content ID claim that you believe was made in error: yt.be/help/LKJN. Hope this helps!

@TheChoujinVirus

2 жыл бұрын

my guess is you violated one of the review rules

@catweaselttv

2 жыл бұрын

@@KZreadViewers My guess is the system is being abused and I think you all know that.

@elgavilanalexespinoza820

2 жыл бұрын

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥...I think if they asked you to do a review, they should have given you a fair use right to their music, in writing to protect your creative rights, using their work but authorized in writing. in this way it defends you from any claim of copyrights 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 Creo que si ellos te pidieron , que hicieras un reviews, deberían haberte dado un derecho sobre uso legítimo su música, por escrito para proteger tus derechos de creatividad,usando el trabajo de ellos pero autorizados por escrito. De esta manera te defiende de cualquier reclamo de copyrights.

@sohailahmadtech6770

2 жыл бұрын

ہم کھڑے تھے ، ہم کھڑے ہیں ، ہم کھڑے رہیں گے ، یقین کے ساتھ ، ایمان کے ساتھ ، پاکستان کے ساتھ ، عمران خان کے ساتھ ، ان شاء اللہ 🇵🇰💯♥️🥀🌹👍

This is very informative. One thing though, When people complain that their entire video got claimed for a two second copyright protected clip, they aren’t necessarily suggesting that two seconds is short enough to be considered fair use. They are saying that it’s not fair that the entirety of the ad revenue for the video now goes to someone that only owns two seconds of it. Your platform desperately requires revenue share.

@_iamraj

4 жыл бұрын

yes... if I just use a copyright music in my video, than the revenue from the video should be shared among the two... not the whole revenue should go to copyright owner..

@Oxygen1um

4 жыл бұрын

+++++ They already have option like this, for covers and etc. (but how it works - who knows)

@peschex0d

4 жыл бұрын

@TryHardNinja I generally agree with you, however I have exactly one viral video and another channel's author used a few seconds of mine video and of two other guys videos a) without my and their permission nor notification b) without any mention of origin c) he added paid advertisement to his video d) he made preview clickbate using stop frame from my video e) he claimed my strike as fraudulent one I won't go to court just because I have no spare time for that. I have less than $100 earnings for my entire channel a month, so I see no financial reason to sue that author. However it would be fine if he asked for reuse first, and added some link to my channel or my video he copied. Am I asking too much?

@amybackstage5164

4 жыл бұрын

@@Oxygen1um it works only if the owner of the song wants to do it. they don't agree and keep all the money even if you put hard work and effort into your OWN version of the song I do covers in my other channel and it's really annoying

@detectivescrotes

4 жыл бұрын

@@peschex0d Legally speaking, yes you are asking too much. They don't need to do any of the things you are complaining about under fair use, and yes it sounds like your copyright claim was a frivolous one. I can almost guarantee that you would have lost if you would have taken it to court, so it was lucky you didn't. On top of that you opened yourself up to being sued yourself.

Can I use images that I altered in Photoshop? By altered I mean, I assembled several images, therefore creating a new image with several layers of those pictures. I am sorry if this is confusing. I am just not that familiarized with this type of vocabulary in English.

Me: Can I use others videos? KZread: *Yesn't*

can you talk about the abuse of the copyright claim feature too? There are people out there claiming content that does not belong to them and do it constantly.

@chronosschiron

4 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/k5t7stpmqpizj9Y.html KZread WINS LAWSUIT VS COPYRIGHT TROLL

@artembilokur2252

4 жыл бұрын

Alex

@khannaankit102

4 жыл бұрын

YES THRY ARE DOING IT ON THE SAME VIDEO AGAIN AND AGAIN. I GOT FLAGGED ON THE SAME VIDEO THRICE ONE OF WHICH IN THE END WAS GETTING ME A STRIKE FOR SADISTIC PLEASURE IT SEEMS TO ME OR THE PERSON IS INSANE FULLY. I DON'T KNOW WHICH OF THEM AFOREMENTIONED IS TRUE, BUT I ASSUME THAT KZread WANT'S US TO NOT USE IT INDIRECTLY

@glats5c

Жыл бұрын

@@khannaankit102 It happened to me too for playing GD and it was MY gameplay

Twice I pulled music from the KZread Audio library and it was flagged as copyrighted. The second time, I went through the dispute process and had to wait 30 days for the video to be able to be monetized, even though it was KZread's already-approved music.

@TreeBarkProductions

2 жыл бұрын

Some songs require you give them a specific type of credit. That may be the reason why.

@skahg4771

2 жыл бұрын

@@TreeBarkProductions how would anyone find that out for any specific song? if its on the public domain list, that's defeating the entire purpose of public domain. Id be curious which artists would upload public domain music just to fuckin strike it. That would be good content for a video actually.

@TreeBarkProductions

2 жыл бұрын

@@skahg4771 They have different licensing requirements. Some are 100% public domain, while others require credit.

@joshc7032

2 жыл бұрын

It’s also possible some random person claimed it, this happened with one of the fat rats songs

@redscosbullsh1t

2 жыл бұрын

omg

When I’m using music in my videos, I normally just stick to copyright free music, but there have been songs that I’ve been using like a “You Spin Me Round (Like a Record)” remix made by Tallcat-Man I had been using throughout October, but in November, I was getting claimed for it, i’m not sure if they were falsely copyright claiming me though, it’s a remix of the original song, which means the content has been significantly transformed, so it doesn’t make sense that I still got claimed :/

And yet all those godzilla stop motion youtubers manage to get soundtracks into their videos, yet when I try, I CANT?!

Of course my comment was deleted....

@rajusinghyadav1433

3 жыл бұрын

Hi

@rajusinghyadav1433

3 жыл бұрын

Hello

@robloxgirlgames7815

3 жыл бұрын

Why?

@rufoustulip7

3 жыл бұрын

What was the comment?

@getphone26

3 жыл бұрын

ความจ

Okay, KZread... explain this: I received a copyright claim because I played a piece of copyrighted music even though it should clearly fall under Fair Use. 1. I played a piece of music the original artist submitted to me himself, for the sole purpose of playing it on a live stream and giving him feedback on the production. 2. The content was educational in nature and the original artist benefits from it by learning something. 3. His piece of music wasn't the only piece played and critiqued, there were many more over the course of the stream, meaning the sole purpose of the stream was NOT to spread copyrighted material. 4. The claimant and the artist being represented are based in the US, so US Fair Use laws apply and thus the above-named things should be taken into account. I, of course, disputed the claim since this should be considered Fair Use, the dispute was rejected. I then muted the audio of that song in particular, because live streams and donations are a big part of my channel and I can't risk losing those. However, the fact that the claimant rejected my Fair Use dispute even though it's a clear cut case of Fair Use is what is a problem to begin with and this all ties back to the horrible system KZread uses where claimants get to decide if my dispute is right or wrong. So this video specifically says, that only a judge can decide if something is Fair Use or not. So why then is it, when I file a dispute because I believe the claim is indeed Fair Use, that the claimant gets to decide over that and not a judge as you say? There is no court case until it reaches the point where the damage to my channel is already done! The claimant decides if my dispute is correct or false... If they reject it, I can appeal that decision, however with the risk of putting a copyright strike on my channel, limiting my options for live streaming and receiving donations, which are the two things that keep my channel going. So, not a viable option to risk that. Only if my appeal is rejected again it'll become a court case, but by that time, my channel will already have a strike on it limiting my channel severely. So we can safely say, this is not a viable option for me to take. KZread keeps specifically stating in this video they can't decide if something is Fair Use or not and that only a judge can, then why is that not happening when I dispute a claim based on Fair Use? You are literally proven yourself wrong with this exact statement in the video. When you drag somebody into court, that is a fight between 2 parties and the third party, the judge, is the one to make an unbiased judgment. You are not going to let the defendant or accuser decide on the result of the court case right? So when I receive a copyright claim, why is there no third party to look over these? Why is the claimant the one to decide if I'm right or wrong? That is like having a court case and letting the accuser decide if the defender's arguments are false or correct. KZread should have a team of copyright specialists looking into every single copyright case as a third party overlooking the process to make sure things go the way they should. And then I haven't even talked about the copyright claims that I constantly receive when I'm making music on KZread, claims on videos where the video itself already disproves the claim itself and therefore should never be appearing on my channel in the first place. The fact that I receive claim after claim on content which is clearly my own is a big sign something is horribly broken when it comes to copyright on KZread. So, instead of ignoring all my tweets, comments, emails and other forms of contact I tried, maybe it would be wise to at least come back to me with an explanation like you would expect in the case of a KZread "partnership". We creators signed an agreement to be in a partnership with KZread, yet we creators completely lack the amount of transparency and communication you would expect from a true partnership. So, is it really a partnership or does KZread simply call it that when it actually isn't? As a creator who has spend a lot of time on this platform since day one, I can sadly say that I'm reaching a point where IF a new platform equivalent to KZread shows up, I would not hesitate one bit to jump ship. And as a creator who has put thousands of hours into his channel, that is a very hard choice to make. However, we've reached a point where things are so broken, KZread is moving into a direction that is favoring big corporations over the independent creators who have been the reason of the success of KZread, and I absolutely don't like that. If during this entire wall of text I have understood something wrong, then please KZread respond and explain it to me instead of ignoring me making matters a lot worse. I signed the partnership agreement years ago, but until this date, I have never received any help when it comes to issues with my channel, nor has KZread ever responded to any of my questions I asked them... Now THAT is a great partnership... not!

@incognitofelon

3 жыл бұрын

Bravo! Well said.

@haleyycopter

3 жыл бұрын

💯

@jauntiness

2 жыл бұрын

#Facts

@BlAcKeYs00

2 жыл бұрын

No reply KZread? Come on...

@SFAGYT

2 жыл бұрын

I'm sorry for your channel

LoL this reminds me of when pewdiepie wanted to add his OWN song to a video and the youtube algorithm told him sorry, this is copyrighted owned by (don't remember lol), he wrote to youtube but they just answered that he can't prove that it's his music, ultimately after a couple of months he took care of it but this just proves that YT is broken.

@polishgarnek

Жыл бұрын

I remember that Music labers are scammy But there are "fake music labels" that teake non coppyritted and steal their rights to scam everybody There's recently been this "label" from russia that strikes everything and even spams false claims Cose there is no way russian music label has rights to nightcore, bassboosted, sped up, and songs with Non coppyritted music in title

KZread: we do not decide what is fair use, the judge does Also youtube: fair use is that there is no fair use

How are music analysis channels even supposed to work then? Do you just talk about what you are referring to instead of playing at least a 5 seconds clip of it? That makes the video lose a lot of educational value, if not all of it. In the entire history of music teaching, teachers have always shown examples of everything they are explaining... this is still nonsense imo.

@TheGelatinousSnake

4 жыл бұрын

Official answer is "deal with it." you have to bear with it, get dmca'd, go through the process and argue fair use in court. The biggest argument will most likely be "Market Usurpation." example if its a song and people go to your vid just to listen to the song, you clearly usurped the songs marketability. And it would be up to you to argue in court that examining 5 sec of a song for educational purposes doesnt usurp the market. So yes, its abuse.. But youtube doesn't care

@PWNHUB

4 жыл бұрын

Unfortunately for the record labels out there they actually will lose in every court, and their only option is abusing the manual claim system and scaring people. The starting and stopping of the song, with your voice added with commentary about the music is in fact protected by fair use. By the same standard though you introducing a song like your a DJ or MTV VJ is not covered in anyway. Education, Critiquing, and some forms of Sampling are protected, simply put using the entire raw audio in a video is not ok. There is a lot of ways around this but thats not the point.

@saps4756

4 жыл бұрын

@@TheGelatinousSnake can't deal with it when we can't go to court

@b4ttlemast0r

4 жыл бұрын

you are allowed to show a short clip, that's fair use. Many companies just don't care about it and strike you anyway.

@SiberianGoneInternational

4 жыл бұрын

maybe try singing that song instead of playing it XD

Yet UMG are literally just claiming any video with random timestamps. They claimed a stream I had as a vod with no music within it and the time stamp was when I was at the toilet and it was silent!!!!!!! Broken system

@JasonBlack66

4 жыл бұрын

Gimme credit and you can most certainly use my music For Free (so long as your not making lots of money from it, then I would like a cut :P)

@MikinessAnalog

4 жыл бұрын

I always wondered when silence was going to be copyrighted. Now I know

@TickleMePinkGaming

4 жыл бұрын

@@JasonBlack66 no ones going to use your music either make it free or dont fucking advertise it

@fordcorrigan

4 жыл бұрын

Yes, silence has already been copyrighted! If such silence is 4 minutes and 33 seconds long the estate of John Cage might come after you ! Just make sure no musicians are present...

@t.e.a.r.3429

4 жыл бұрын

@Rhino Gaming kek, amazing analysis!

Please make a video about autolicensing through text attribution, for no-copyright / freetouse music. It exists, and has for 10+ years, and yet, there's no information about it. Thank you

2:06 Is footage of me driving with logos just passing by in the background considered fair use? If not then what should I do?

KZread is pandering so heavily to the corporations in this video. "Only courts have the ability to decide" is KZread saying "We won't treat it as fair use until the courts decide". Look at how they threaten creators by saying "Even a few seconds may not be deemed fair use". This is how they convince you that removing content automatically without any legal action being taken by the corporation is reasonable. How can you have a fair use doctrine when every video, even those that fall under fair use, is swiftly removed from the platform when even a few seconds of material is caught by its copyright checking robots? This is "guilty until proven innocent", not "innocent until proven guilty", and it is truly unjust.

@talen9235

2 жыл бұрын

You honestly put it perfectly. Do you mind if I quote you in a paper I'm writing for my English class?

@whompetgaming3881

2 жыл бұрын

From what I can tell DMCA muddies the water. It forces KZread to remove videos or risk being sued for inaction. So KZread is playing it safe for themselves by going over board and removing fair use content. I think if the law was updated to make the type of copyrighted content you have to remove more specific it would help.

@scarecrow108productions7

Жыл бұрын

@@whompetgaming3881 screw the DMCA

Just a question, if I dressed up as the Joker and do one of my videos normally, is this fair use?

@veinteresting

4 жыл бұрын

Parody you mean?

@bec_r_r

4 жыл бұрын

Wouldn’t bother me cause I don’t know what the Joker should really look like.

@veinteresting

4 жыл бұрын

I like your response Bec R

@DedJezter

4 жыл бұрын

If you dress up as the Joker, act like the Joker and in no way change anything about it as well as monetizing your video... it would not be fair use. WB owns the on screen likeness of the Joker and you could essentially cause them to lose money (not really likely) from their version. So not fair use. If you parody the Joker in some way, it would be far safer overall.

@CDReimer

4 жыл бұрын

If you dress up as Mario, Nintendo will take you down. They're very aggressive about their copyrights and most creators stay clear of them.

I was always curious about this! This is great considering I do a lot of remixes of copyrighted music. A big goal I have with my uploads is to be sure that they're far from just straight copies. I like what it says about adding, "new expression or meaning" to the original content.

me: copyright claiming this video for being a small shareholder of KZread... KZread: "Change of plans"

So basically, for my $20 a month... in 1000 years I could afford a lawyer to dispute some BS... great.

Here's a massive problem with KZread's "fair use" approach, however. 02:41 "Companies are claiming just a few seconds of a video. How is that not abuse?" Ignoring the "lol just use 3 seconds of audio and it's fine" nonsense people try to pull - copyrighted material for only a few seconds of a video DOES NOT at any point in licensing of copyrighted material result in ALL OF THE EARNINGS of that video being taken. There's so many elements of copyright-able work in a single video, that just copyright claim of the composition or recording of a song should NEVER take the entire revenue of a video. Period. This is a lazy, stealing method of not providing a tool for creators to license out these chunks of material. Sure, not every publisher will allow such licensing - but many do, KZread just isn't facilitating that.

@AmazeAngeloGames

2 жыл бұрын

lol

@MrFunNightcore

2 жыл бұрын

Companies is much more VIP than there Creator

@harindrayadav8396

2 жыл бұрын

No hi Jo uuu hi uu

@WesternViking

2 жыл бұрын

True, i have a half an hour video that i worked on for many hours. It contains about 17 seconds of copyrighted music (the curb your enthousiasm meme theme...) and the entire video gets claimed by that company. What??

@saugatoli7659

2 жыл бұрын

Jn. Nij

2:05 KZread ads: I'm going to do that

I heard on other youtube videos that if you take copyrighted material and make enough changes to it to make your own there won't be any copyright isue involve. Is that accurate information?

ok but like not all of us has thousands of dollars to dump on a pointless court case

@AlpineSkylar

3 жыл бұрын

Exactly

@Wetzwagen

3 жыл бұрын

Yo the horizon I'm a big fan SUP

@bukhariyadav3142

3 жыл бұрын

@Crawford Klinner 4ऊ54ऊ

@bukhariyadav3142

3 жыл бұрын

@@AlpineSkylar य

@bukhariyadav3142

3 жыл бұрын

@Crawford Klinner छिघघघघ

When are you gonna respect this policy?

@deathgaming4657

3 жыл бұрын

Can someone clear my doubt?-I used music in my gaming video

@Andolina12

3 жыл бұрын

@@deathgaming4657 WHat was the song and was it from a video?

@ProHigherYT

3 жыл бұрын

Because that's not my policy

@XruiX

3 жыл бұрын

I’m never going to

@msvillann

3 жыл бұрын

Lol

A lot of those Cobra Kai videos on KZread I'm sure is not fair use copyright because I'm sure them channels are monetizing off of them but the KZreadrs keep subscribing to them by supporting them breaking the copyright law, so they continue doing it.

So in other words, it is harder than sh*t. KZreadrs make it look so easy, and the American manner is to always tell you "oh you can also do it" because apparently most people live in a fantasy bubble; and that "encouragement" at the end only serves to your downfall, because it takes a lot of a heck of work to learn by trial and error, tripping and falling, than anybody would ever let you see. They tell you "you can do it" as if it was the same easy to do it as to not do it. Next time they tell you "nobody said it would be easy" reply right away "yes you did! by saying 'you can do it'", because they say it to make it sound easy. People (acquaintances, friends) should only tell it as it is, with both your chances to succeed and to fail, and only at the end give you encouragement to do anything you want to do.

What’s the point on doing fair use if KZread will determinate you can’t monetize because reused content

This is just a nice way of explaining how great corporations are basically taking over youtube. Most of us, contents creators, know that companies have been striking us mercilessly for using a few seconds of their material in what would clearly classify as Fair Use. Those false strikes are being designed to actually take control away from contents creators.

@raosahebnandgave2950

Жыл бұрын

राज यांन

I love it when I have a 10 minute character study, I use a single quote, and my video is immediately flagged.

you tube's default "we dont decide fair use" statement.... "even though we do it daily with out regard for any of the information we supplied in this video" is quite comical.

KZread: Copyright Policy Also KZread: Now introducing KZread Music and KZread TV!

after watching this video, I got scared, it turns out that my video content uses a lot of other people's rights :(

@SANDYSSKILLZ

3 жыл бұрын

Let's be safe henceforth

@ronaldsmalling9751

3 жыл бұрын

@@SANDYSSKILLZ f2f2ddde g2d .

@AutomotiveDysfunction

3 жыл бұрын

🤣

@deathgaming4657

3 жыл бұрын

Can someone clear my doubt?-I used music in my gaming video

@MaSTeRXDOfficial

3 жыл бұрын

relatable

Thank you for keeping us within the loop with the KZread Creators series. I have a copyright question that I was hoping someone could help me with. I'm currently working on a video and want to mention, within the opening, "In admiration of Sergio Leone" (the famous director) - is that ok to do? Within my video I will be using music from within YT's video library, the opening sequence of my video will be similar to one of Leone's openings, yet the artwork will be my own unique creation. Is there any sure way to know, beforehand, if I'm crossing any legal boundaries? I have read the YT TOS several times yet seem to feel that I may be within a gray area with this idea. Is there any way to know for sure, or have the video reviewed BEFORE I publish it? Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated: Thank you!

i love painting and drawing but how can i use the title of a video game that is already out there . with copy rights law applied here .?? example tom clancy's the division or assassin creed .

I always wondered how reaction YT channels do it.

@FrancisMossang

3 жыл бұрын

😅😂

@FrancisMossang

3 жыл бұрын

Ninja techniques...

@HomelanderHL2

3 жыл бұрын

Ikr they monitize their channel whole channel witg copyright claim i'm like how?!.

@mikelampt2418

3 жыл бұрын

They get licenses

@dannireacts781

3 жыл бұрын

They aren't claiming the content but rather giving "criticism" (reacting)

Thanks for trying to clear it up. Atleast now I know that no one knows.

@HannahTheHorrible

4 жыл бұрын

Building America with jared goplen my thoughts exactly

@omokok1877

4 жыл бұрын

You are top comment for me?

@23.5degrees8

4 жыл бұрын

hehehehe

@diajengsupriyadi

4 жыл бұрын

Semangat bikin chanel baru

@julianpuig3809

4 жыл бұрын

So like for example I would like to have we re doing a sequel for my videos I have to go to court to get it right

There is no "court" on youtube. The copyright holder is the judge, jury and executioner. If they detect their copyright in your footage, THEY get to decide what happens. Its completely unfair.

I am working on a documentary. May I use clips from news sources (their KZread videos)? It will be max 10secs of a clip. Please advise

Protect channels getting false claims before removing yourself from the "fair-use" argument.

4:05 Automated systems like content ID shouldn't be able to automatically demonetise someone's video. It should be able to notify potential copyright claimants, but that's it. Since fair use is in your own words "subjective case-by-case decision", you CANNOT use a guilty until proven innocent' approach. That is objectively wrong.

@Jaa_morant

4 жыл бұрын

Ok man need your help here.As i understood from your answer, if I am starting a channel which is GENERALLY about music(so i will tell the biorgaphy of an artist for instance,) can i use copyrighted content without any fears for BAN? And does yotube ban videos in which there is copyrighted music or only demonetize some of them?

@seven4280

4 жыл бұрын

j travolto if u use copyrighted content thats not yours the owner most can do is take it down and give your channel a strike,but as you said you are going to use copyrighted songs then -you can reupload them but you most probably won't make any money from them as the video will get automatically monetized by the owner

@Jaa_morant

4 жыл бұрын

@@seven4280 than mate,can we get away with using instrumentals most of the time?I mean pretty much everyone use them in videos in the background and it looks as if they are ok with that

@seven4280

4 жыл бұрын

j travolto when i say music it means anything sound if that is copyrighted you are not gonna make a single penny if u put thatbin your video,and also check youtubes new rules on what type of content can be monetize search on google ,read the latest post 2020 feb12 in yhat they said reposted content will never be monetized

@seven4280

4 жыл бұрын

j travolto also you can use copyright free musics,videos anything without any fear in your videos,

Question let's say I am playing truck simulator and want to show gameplay, but I have the radio TruckSIm FM or something playing all the latest songs, even though the video is about the trucking and the radio is built into the game to be played within the game all the songs are copyright and so is this fair use or a no no?

@ReaIIyRichRecords

2 жыл бұрын

You cant get copyright for in-game music that's just stupid 💀

@gamingdalesandrelaxingmusi7444

2 жыл бұрын

@@ReaIIyRichRecords Pretty sure you can but just checking as I keep getting copyright strikes and have to mute gameplay as the music in it gets flagged as being copyright, I suppose the music in the games are licensed for personal use and not to be recorded and uploaded onto KZread or other places

¿Se puede compartir la monetización con el creador, haciendo un video que tenga valoraciones y agregados extras del video original?

Automated systems like content ID can't account for fair use, but they can automatically accuse you of being guilty by design.

@Jaa_morant

4 жыл бұрын

Ok man need your help here.As i understood from your answer, if I am starting a channel which is GENERALLY about music(so i will tell the biorgaphy of an artist for instance,) can i use copyrighted content without any fears for BAN? And does yotube ban videos in which there is copyrighted music or only demonetize some of them?

@YouTubeViewers

4 жыл бұрын

If you plan to include copyright-protected material in your video, you’ll generally need to seek permission to do so first. KZread can’t grant you these rights and we can’t help you find the parties who can grant them to you. You’ll have to research and handle this process on your own or with a lawyer’s help. More info here: yt.be/help/xF5F

@Jaa_morant

4 жыл бұрын

@@KZreadViewers Need your answer: can i use parts of other videos briefly im ny own(2-4 seconds) are there sites where videos can be taken freely?

@YouTubeViewers

4 жыл бұрын

Happy to help, if you plan to use or include copyright-protected material on your videos, you generally need to seek permission from the copyright owner first. Copyright owners may choose how they want to enforce their rights on a video-by-video basis. More info can be found here: yt.be/help/j2xJ

@SemorreButte

4 жыл бұрын

@@Jaa_morant No, I uploaded a video featuring about 6 songs that sound similar; comparing 5 second clips each. I am not monetized and only have like 5 followers but YT deleted my video and gave me a 1/3 strike on my account. It was automated, nothing taken to reason

"The main focus of your video is copyrighted material" So what happens to movie reviews/commentaries?

@goonjmotivational

3 жыл бұрын

Yes... What happens to movie reviews??? Somebody pls clarify

@tenispasion5080

3 жыл бұрын

Same, my channel basically focuses on commenting current tennis news, so I use a lot of images for this. Is this fair use?

@kBandik

3 жыл бұрын

Didn't they say that reviews was fair use? I'm not sure tho, I'm myself trying to solve the problem with fair use stuff...

@Gluzzer

3 жыл бұрын

@@goonjmotivational Criticism falls under fair use.

@LoneBeastYT

2 жыл бұрын

Delayed reply but here it is... This will fall under another section known as "use for criticism and review" in "transformative content" As long as you are criticising or reviewing the copyrighted material during its use..it is considered as fair use Please note I am no legal advisor and I don't claim any liability for adverse effects to your channel...but the above message is what I found out from a few youtubers

If i play piano of copyrighted music and uploadndoni get copyright cliam?

I’m so tired of watching KZreadrs try to comment on videos, but can’t because it has some background music. They always have to muted the video because of “fair use”, making the commenting impossible.

The problem isnt that we/creators dont know what fair use it. The problem is that the ORIGINAL COPYRIGHT HOLDERS DON'T HONOR THE FAIR USE!

@MichaelGlennglennimages

3 жыл бұрын

They don’t? Explain

@ursonate

2 жыл бұрын

@@MichaelGlennglennimages An example is when a really boring video is being used for the purpose of criticism, which is valid under Fair Use, and the original copyright holder being criticized makes a claim not only because they don't like what's being said about them, but also because the new, edited, and highly transformative video gets more views.

@MichaelGlennglennimages

2 жыл бұрын

@@ursonate yes that is correct. The chance of losing a fair use case in that specific instance is unlikely. Although if one wanted to sue for it they could. It would cost them time and money.

@MichaelGlennglennimages

2 жыл бұрын

Creators are copyright holders. People who use others work are copyright infringers. Aggregators. They aren’t creators.

@MrChopsticktech

Жыл бұрын

@@ursonate Fair Use is not absolute simply because you claim it. Google it, or watch this video again.

One thing that would help *_immensely_* for music problems, is for KZread to allow & keep multiple audio tracks in uploads. That way, any music that is NOT in the same track as the creator's voice or main audio can be safely removed without affecting voice or main audio quality. This way, it lies on the creator to record and/or upload with multiple audio tracks so these things can be separated from the start.

what about the KZread audio library . can i use more than one audio in one video

The rules of fair use seem to be at the whims of some esoteric algorithms decision. I've had music that claimed to be royalty free get flagged one once video while the same music was considered fine on another.

I love how KZread pretends now that original content is what made it successful. MOST of the time that I am on KZread, I am looking for tribute videos of copyrighted work.

@wisevoice5393

4 жыл бұрын

KZread is turning into a tv channel.in future only music videos and videos created by professionals tv studios will exist iin it.

@rka1010

4 жыл бұрын

@@wisevoice5393 you only say that because your channel has no hits and no subscribers. You might get some activity if you were posting things that people actually want to see. Copying all the big KZreadrs will get you nowhere because EVERYONE ELSE is also doing it. I only post things that I would want to watch myself.

@wisevoice5393

4 жыл бұрын

@@rka1010 I make videos out of my opinions. Something that I wish people would care to watch.It doesn't matter if nobody watches them. I don't really care much about being a huge youtuber. I just love making videos and as I have free time, i will try keep making them.About KZread they are definitely more into promoting channels that post movie trailers and music videos, which is not balanced on content made on KZread. How to videos and motivational videos deserve their own place in this platform.

@rka1010

4 жыл бұрын

​@@wisevoice5393 How to videos and motivational videos are the only things I ever get promoted to me these days. You need to realize that everyone on KZread is seeing something different. They are promoting music videos and movie trailers to you because that's what you click on. If you want something different, you have to search for it and click on it, and keep doing that. There are billions of videos on here about everything, and most are not going away anytime soon. They are encouraging us to do original content because it saves them the hassle of dealing with copyright strikes. The more we comply, the more carefree money they make.

@mattwo7

4 жыл бұрын

@@rka1010 Pretty sure them getting no hits and no subscribers has nothing to do with no one wanting to see their content. With professional looking thumbnails like those, they should at least be getting clicks. Also you're not one to talk about doing things everyone else does. Clips of TV shows and movies and gameplay videos with or without commentary are a dime a dozen.

Fair Use is a legal minefield. Just avoid all material that isn’t copyright free. Been there done that

@soloparaplaystation6624

3 жыл бұрын

No jail for this, just banner on KZread!!

@ta5777

3 жыл бұрын

are we allowed to show pictures from tv shows? Or is that subject to fair use also?

@gamercatishere4759

3 жыл бұрын

Easier said then done...

@cheesyvogue3608

3 жыл бұрын

I just wanna ask.. if we use a fair use.. is we still can monetize our channel?

@soloparaplaystation6624

2 жыл бұрын

@Sugma court orders? How wich?

So would amvs be alright ive made two sourced the music and video data and said i dont own the material is this okay please reply to me so i know its good

What do I do if I want to download a video from youtube (for Fair Use purposes in one of my videos)?

I am glad that the content ID system is getting improved. I get tired of all the false claims. I even had a claim on my voice, yes me talking.

@nash139

Жыл бұрын

Must be ur parents

@basic_avarage_person

Жыл бұрын

You still can get false claim by company

@makhdoomafuad2607

Жыл бұрын

@@basic_avarage_person hwy hi u r online at the same timw im here lol😂

@africaart

Жыл бұрын

Two years later, someone blocked my video with my own voice and my own image I created from a blank whiteboard animation app. It is a censorship weapon.

@PERFECTFIRE13

Жыл бұрын

Is it considered false claim if it’s RIAJ that’s taking down my work?

What is fair use? H3H3 vs Matt Hoss. Your best example on the platform.

@TheOutThereChannel

4 жыл бұрын

yes but media corps ignore it.. how many hollywood clips have you used and gotten away with it?

@YouTubeViewers

4 жыл бұрын

Good question. Fair use is a legal doctrine that says you can reuse copyright-protected material under certain circumstances without getting permissio​n from the copyright owner. Learn more here: yt.be/help/3Zuw

@advocatusdiaboli9351

4 жыл бұрын

It's not an example. Court cases often also rely on how good the lawyer is, so a small KZreadr who doesn't have the H3 millions might lose the same case.

@theLisRe4L

4 жыл бұрын

@@KZreadViewers AKA bot that just attended the question without noticing it was a retoric question

@BecauseGames

4 жыл бұрын

@@TheOutThereChannel the keywork here is clips and assuming the clips were used in a transformative piece of content why is this claimable? you always have to ask is it: "transformative" is it "educational" is it "a critic" the problem here is most of the time these things are often debatable and youtube doesn't have the authority to say one way or the other, unfortunately they are between a rock and hard place and have to allow people to report such things and this reporting system is hugely open to abuse by people who don't care or simply don'y understand these things.

In a 3 mins video I have used other video clips for 40 sec will i get copyright? please reply

I have a question: How do I secure rights over trademarked assets the proper way in order to produce, hopefully, Quality derivative work that would make the original rights owners happy?

So do you mean to say that actual people on KZread, average people have been taken to court and lost their hard earned possessions because a multi national company feels aggrieved?

@PrimalEdge

4 жыл бұрын

actually, I think she said, YT knows nothing, sees nothing, and DOES nothing.... unless you're big media.... it's all so rigged. CNN/FOX could run a 45 minute segment on the Batwoman on CW showing virtually the WHOLE episode and nothing, you can't play 12 seconds of the trailer and critique it. watch this video a few times, there's more double talk in there than there was in the last debate!

@tjmarx

4 жыл бұрын

Yes Bec, if you are using someone else's work to try and profit it doesn't matter how much money they have or you have, you are breaking the law and they have every right to sue you. Don't use copyrighted material unless you actually know what you are doing and are prepared to spend money defending that position in court.

@tjmarx

4 жыл бұрын

@@PrimalEdge There is no two class system and this isn't a KZread thing. This is copyright LAW, if you don't like copyright law talk to your government about it. In terms of your example, no CNN can not just run a whole episode of someone else's content and get away with that. CNN and The CW are both owned by Warner Media. CNN can run as much of an episode from the CW as they want as long as the editor approves it with corporate. What you're describing is called cross promotion. Further to that point, you also seem to fail to understand behind the scenes licencing. Large media groups have entire media departments filled with lawyers. They know what they can and can not get away with under the law, but where they want to use someone else's work they licence it just for safe measure. So let's say CNN wanted to play a clip shot by the BBC, they would contact distributions and licencing at the BBC News desk and pay a fee (usually somewhere from $500 - $5000) to licence that clip for the express use purpose. No copyright is violated because they have permission.

@PrimalEdge

4 жыл бұрын

TJ Marx I’m not really sure if you accidentally wandered here or not, but this is YT. You might want to check it out. Maybe see some of the hundreds of thousands of hours of content out there where people are critiquing movies books TV shows video games and pretty much anything and everything out there that is copywritten. The only reason this copyright fair use issue has come up in the last year is because big media has moved off of their platforms on to KZread. And before you respond go out there and check the hundreds of thousands of hours of people that have Paul proof that their stuff has been demonetized where in the past it has not. The fair use laws haven’t changed, the content creators have grown. And this all happened right around the same time KZread has made a large push towards throttling back on “non-confirmed media outlets“ and there’s tons of videos on that as well. Ever since all the big media companies have piled onto KZread and started monetizing their channels on KZread all the other content creators who have been enjoying monetization for over a decade have started to see Demonetization and D platforming as well as having videos removed. This was never an issue for almost 15 years it’s only come up in the last 18 months. Check the fax. This is not my opinion, this is me watching it happen first hand.

@tjmarx

4 жыл бұрын

@@PrimalEdge Roflmao. You've got quite a conspiracy going on in your head there. Shame it actually isn't how things are.

Here’s my rules about copyright: If someone uses my content without credit in the description, they will get a copyright strike. If someone uses my content with credit in the description. They will not get a copyright strike.

@MarvelGirlMona

4 жыл бұрын

Same here

@detectivescrotes

4 жыл бұрын

There is no requirement under fair use to give a credit to the original creator. You could even be opening yourself up to being sued doing this.

@domesticlovergirl

3 жыл бұрын

i gave the credit to the owner in the description.....still i got claimed...help me someone : (

@rairai9606

3 жыл бұрын

@@domesticlovergirl ask permission to the copyright owner

@domesticlovergirl

3 жыл бұрын

@@rairai9606 how can i ask bighit 🙃....they have more than 30 million subscribers and more than 100 million fans 🙂

I have a question, my streaming do not use the copyrighted content, but it recognizes that I’m used the copyrighted content by mistake. How to solve it?

Thanks for reminding us how wacky the copyright system is, KZread. *Ah yes,* this truly explains why DBZ fan art is prohibited to post on youtube.

I have a copyright claim on one of my videos for using a free stock footage clip from a website that states right next to the clip that it's free to use and no attribution is needed. What I have learned is that KZread will let anyone claim ownership of a creator's video without investigating it, so basically anyone can steal ad revenue just by saying that they own a portion of your work. This system is seriously flawed.

@wickedsmahtshorts5103

2 жыл бұрын

Hey dude, you got any updates? Did you try disputing?

@StuckInTheKernfield

2 жыл бұрын

@@wickedsmahtshorts5103 I did. It took about a week for it to go through the process. The other person dropped their claim, so I was able to get the ad revenue back.

@wickedsmahtshorts5103

2 жыл бұрын

@@StuckInTheKernfield Well, I hope you didn't lose any revenue! Happy for ya

@ShazzledWolf32

Жыл бұрын

@@wickedsmahtshorts5103 I tried disputing copyright claims before they threatened to take my channel down no copyright strikes no strikes of any kind

Nobody: Captions 00:02 : hi i am sorry Me: i forgive you🙂

@jackandthesunset6491

4 жыл бұрын

me : thats fine baby

@cleavoncherry1419

2 жыл бұрын

@@jackandthesunset6491 you have

@user-ks9nc5xb9s

11 ай бұрын

2:48 😊​@@jackandthesunset6491bb😮😮7b 2:02 bbmuh. 😅🐖😮😅 2:j 6 😢 bv😊Y, JJune​I 😮😮😮🐷🐷🐷🐖🐗🥦🥦🥬🥈🥈🥈🥈😊😊

It would be good for youtube to post on a video description if it is copywritten or not. Just a thought