Expansionary Fiscal Policy and the Tax Multiplier

Тәжірибелік нұсқаулар және стиль

Policymakers possess a handful of tools with which to respond to macroeconomic shocks. In this video we'll introduce fiscal policy, and illustrate and explain how the tools it offers can be used to help close a recessionary gap.

Пікірлер: 14

  • @aminahahmed4399
    @aminahahmed43994 жыл бұрын

    im from malaysia and you really help me with my final exam. thank you so much!!

  • @safianoori3825
    @safianoori38252 жыл бұрын

    Hi, I am from Sydney, Australia, and this video has been so informative in helping my studies. Thank you so much :)

  • @gingernorman2561
    @gingernorman2561 Жыл бұрын

    「あなたの動画はとても良いですし、メッセージがた

  • @realdvgarg
    @realdvgarg4 жыл бұрын

    Whilst explaining concepts using the AD/AS model, we can use the Keynesian graph to represent SRAS right? That is how it's been represented in your book with Sean Maley.

  • @kiky.mp4
    @kiky.mp43 жыл бұрын

    Thank you

  • @Timurlane1905
    @Timurlane19055 жыл бұрын

    Hi Jason, Love your videos and thanks for all you do! A little confused at the end. Wouldn't the MPS be something smaller than 0.5 (to account for MPM)? and therefore, won't the Tax multiplier always be bigger than the -1 you have it shown as here (and could, in theory, be bigger than the Spending Multiplier)? I guess I'm just confused as to why the MPS was 0.5 in your example.

  • @JasonWelker

    @JasonWelker

    5 жыл бұрын

    In this simple model we always assume that MPC+MPS=1. So if MPC=0.5, then MPS=0.5. In other words, of every additional dollar of disposable income, households will spend half and save half. If you're confused by the -MPC/MPS formula, then simply subtract 1 from the spending multiplier to find the tax multiplier (then make it negative, since a change in taxes in one direction will cause GDP to change in the opposite direction). Here are some examples: If MPC=0.8, then MPS=0.2. k = 1/0.2 = 5. Tax multiplier (t) =0.8/0.2 = 4. If MPC=0.6, then MPS=0.4. k = 1/0.4 = 2.5. t = 0.6/0.4 = 1.5 If MPC=0.4, then MPS=0.6. k = 1/0.6 = 1.67. t = 0.4/0.6 = 0.67 In every one of these cases, t = k - 1. Or the tax multiplier is the spending multiplier minus one (not taking into account the negative signs, that is...)

  • @Timurlane1905

    @Timurlane1905

    5 жыл бұрын

    Got it, makes much more sense now. I knew I was missing something (MPC+MPS=1). Thanks!

  • @gettrick32
    @gettrick323 жыл бұрын

    When do you visit Runcorn?

  • @jamesolojo787
    @jamesolojo7875 жыл бұрын

    Jason you are brilliant l love your videos however it's a little bizzare you keep drawing classical diagrams but u keep using the multiplier effect which is a kensyian theory.. Also u show SRAS on the Keynesian model all this is interesting. However keep up your good work.

  • @JasonWelker

    @JasonWelker

    5 жыл бұрын

    Hi James. This is the hybrid model taught at many American universities and endorsed by the College Board for our Advanced Placement program. It is also commonly used in the IB program. It reflects both the relative inflexibility of prices in the short run (SRAS) and the fact that in the long run prices tend to fully adjust (LRAS).

  • @jamesolojo787

    @jamesolojo787

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@JasonWelker Thank you for your explanation cheers.

  • @joshuabunn89
    @joshuabunn894 жыл бұрын

    I loveyou

  • @ugcneteconomicswithanj.5307
    @ugcneteconomicswithanj.53074 жыл бұрын

    I want to request you one thing...plz type not write...your writing is some time tough for understanding.... otherwise your teaching style is awesome....thank u

Келесі