the smartest athlete i've seen in my life

Dr. Randall is a great theoretical physicist and phenomenal teacher. It amazes me how fast she processes information as she answers questions from her students. It is almost as she can see particles with the naked eye. I highly recommend reading her books or listening to her lectures. Thank you for the video and all my admiration for Dr. Randall's contribution to physics, Ciao, L

@iviadables9482

8 жыл бұрын

lancelot1953 #Nobel Institution, thanks for Puting Down #IonMurguSHOEtheory or #IonMurguCUTandPT345Resonator ( #Inertia ), same to be a #NewVision but can to be #False one and to send us into a new #Labirinty . Anyway send it to #history and #ScienceHistory and #pressrelease and #HumansHistory to #remain There as A #Exampl (#BadExample ) about how we Can to go to #Errors in #Science . I liked #TheTear , #TheTearOfGeea as a #NewVision Of #proton , I Liked #Inertia There but I can't to #Folow it with al my mind. Send It also To #GoogleScience , #Yahoo , #NASA , #CERN #Physics #Academy to keep it in theirs minds for future #Analyse and to #Combat it with #Proofs and #Theoretical example that there isn't a #NewBase . Thanks! +California Science Center +ABC News +BBC News +Berkeley Lab +Nobel Prize +NobelWeekDialogue

@lancelot1953

8 жыл бұрын

LeGiTSnIpZ 64 Most women (human female species have two breasts as well) but she has more than that, she is bright, witty, intelligent, thinks faster than 95% of the American population, and is a consummate teacher. She represents what World universities need for teachers. Thank you for her efforts. Ciao, L

@lancelot1953

8 жыл бұрын

Star Trek Theory That I would not know about Dr. Randall, but supernumerary breasts (usually just a nipple rarely larger than an mole) are fairly common in humans, especially in males. The usually go unnoticed. I saw her at a conference, she is a brilliant and a very classy person. Ciao, L

@CandidDate

6 жыл бұрын

Imagine if you will, a scenario. The Large Hadron Collider will be a great museum in tribute to those silly 21st century 'scientists' who thought they could explain what the heck in the world was matter. This would be in 2121 A.D. when we all just get along in our post-nuclear world in tribes and bands of rag tag humans.

@imsidetracted

5 жыл бұрын

i think shes pretty... and makes good power point presentations. i wish would give up on string theory though.

Dr. Lisa Randall , You are amazing !

I think her speech and how she explains issues, is very pleasant to listen to. I'm so happy to see the woman rise up in science, In so many ways they have a better way to explain the mystery. Your awesome Lisa

Watch the entire video love you Dr. Randall, you are a treasure. ❤

I really never liked Science as much as I do now. Dr. Randall, beautiful, smart and easy to listen and learn from. Thank you for the upload. ❤

As enjoyable as it is to watch the close-ups of Professor Randall, I wish the slide show she provided was also included.

She is fantastic being so damn smart and able to explain everything in a way that makes these complicated theories and facts easy to understand. Or at least bringing us closer to understanding them.

Thanks for making this available!

I'm not a scientist and I could listen to you all day. I would be embarrassed to ask questions because I'm not clear on all the terms. 30 years ago in a mind experiment I saw in my mind's eye protons smash together. Among other things, I concluded the collision produced a sharing of matter in an what I called an "Envelope." Two days ago I started watching you on KZread and can apply your terms to what I saw. "Branes" were formed with "Bulks" containing particles of "Warping" energies and trajectories. I love this stuff!

@fredflintstone2958

5 жыл бұрын

Why? Why did you start watching her two days ago? Me, too, btw. But there's a whole bunch of us watching this woman's videos in THE LAST TWO DAYS. There were stretches of weeks and month's, in some cases years, before this heavy recent activity. Is there something going on? Are we being drawn to her (easy enough for me to understand!), somehow? Or is KZread tweeking our feeds to direct us to her? I understand how they work, but this is really odd....

Excellent presentation! As always, Lisa Randall is such a great role model for intelligent women in science.

@madzangels

7 жыл бұрын

Oh shutup

@ragnarokofborg

7 жыл бұрын

> Oh shutup Why?

@deezynar

7 жыл бұрын

Maybe because Learner's comment was sexist.

@learnerlearns

7 жыл бұрын

Not sexist. Pro science and pro-women in science.

@madzangels

7 жыл бұрын

Learner-Learns Pro Women, what so you are trying to perform some kind of counter balance are you? Maybe some Women just don't like Science? Ever think about that? Maybe for some women, I don't know, having children is more important than dwelling on why a Proton behaves the way it does? Just fuck off all together in trying to make this about a sex, it's not, it's about Science, not about Women, or women in Science - just take it for what it is, and quit trying to make something else out of it. Lisa didn't asked to be put on a pedal stool for YOUR female children to look up to you know? She isn't doing it because she has a vagina you know - she does it because of her own self developed personal interest in the matter, and that's as far as it goes. Now fuck off.

Wow incredibly profound, thanks for posting

It is refreshing to know that the experts (the people who make this their lives) don’t know everything. I appreciate their dumbing down for me to understand a bit. Though I think I’m intelligent, I find it very hard to understand!

very good explanation...thanks a ton..really appreciated

Dark matter theories are new form of structure understanding of the cosmos. The lattice views. Excellent teacher.

Greetings from Brazil! Physics rocks!

Keep watching past the end of her presentation... the Q&A portion has some really good explanations.

can't put my finger on the reasons why, but science has become easier to study since Lisa Randall😍

In Buddhist teachings, this is what is meant by acknowledging ignorance, keeping still and looking deeper into causes and conditions.. Most importantly, accepting there is no inherent separate existence of "things', and that all composed or compounded "things" are impermanent. Thank you for posting this, The Aspen Institute. -

@DavidAKZ

9 жыл бұрын

How would the 'nature of emptiness' inform this discussion ?

@madzangels

7 жыл бұрын

Oh shutup

@MrCharlyAndy

6 жыл бұрын

It wouldn't because "empty" doesn't exist due to the zero point energy of the vacuum.

And, of course there's Peter Higgs. Brilliant.

beautiful + intelligent = perfect match...

Conservation of Spatial Curvature (Both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature. A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.) Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. An artificial Christmas tree can hold the ornaments in place, but it is not a real tree. String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What did some of the old clockmakers use to store the energy to power the clock? Was it a string or was it a spring? What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine. Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: “We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr (lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958) The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with some aspects of the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”, and the work of Dr. Lisa Randall on the possibility of one extra spatial dimension? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics? When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if Quark/Gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks where the tubes are entangled? (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry. Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Gluons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change. ===================== Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons? Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension? Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons . Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules. Could the production of multiple writhe cycles help explain the three generations of quarks and neutrinos? If the twist cycles increase, the writhe cycles would also have a tendency to increase. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. ( Mass=1/Length ) The “Electric Charge” of electrons or positrons would be the result of one twist cycle being displayed at the 3D-4D surface interface of the particle. The physical entanglement of twisted tubes in quarks within protons and neutrons and mesons displays an overall external surface charge of an integer number. Because the neutrinos do not have open tube ends, (They are a twisted torus.) they have no overall electric charge. Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter? Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles? I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. This topological Soliton model grew out of that simple idea. I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles. .

She makes this easy to understand and it would be great if her, Dr Sara Seager and Dr Amy Mainzer got together and just talked about their specialities and their findings in their respected fields

Not too much of a struggle to get out of bed for this!

THE MORE I READ YOUR BOOKS AND LISTEN TO YOUR LECTURES THE MORE I WANT TO KNOW BOUT SCIENCE AND ABOUT THE UNIVERSE. I THINK I UNDERSTAND MORE WHAT YOU WRITE AND WHAT YOU SAY .

Thank you!

Brilliant thank you.

"All of the energy and matter that existed still exists. Matter does not create energy of itself. The actions of matter enable energy to become manifest".

the scale difference between the plank length and the cosmological size and the symetry that occurs at different scales could/should be considered as a spatial dimention itself??

@stepover12

7 жыл бұрын

You are probably thinking string theory

@ProgressiveMovement200

7 жыл бұрын

That is an interesting thought, but why the distinction? We go to a smaller length, tho its a true length and not an arbitrary length in dimensions. I would imagine light year a true distance too? Like to hear your opinion on that.

@bopyourhead9584

7 жыл бұрын

Ed Yablecki ; although light speed (c) is considered as a constant there is a possibility of a varying c. my notion is that we see form & structure at different scales, could it be a continuum in both small & large scales? does our entire universe constitute a part of something far bigger and indeed vice versa? this is akin to fractal forms that go on forever but at different magnifications reproduce similar structures? (mandlebrot set). just a thought!

@CandidDate

6 жыл бұрын

+external, planck's constant is about 6 x 10^-34. That's a small number but compared to 6 x 10^-4122, it is a huge number - think about that - scale should not limit your imagination - sometimes I imagine I'm infinitely large/small - peace

@MrCharlyAndy

6 жыл бұрын

It's already a length dimension.

not a bad analogy was it, that road map/street map/floor plan thing?

ESPACIO TIEMPO INTERESANTE,SALUDOS

We can sure see that screen vibrating rather annoyingly. Otherwise, great and compelling introduction, thank you. Please keep articulation of words consistent, also toward the end of a sentence, it will enhance audibility and intelligibility.

Fascinating.

@madzangels

7 жыл бұрын

Oh shutup

@justiceretrohunter2

7 жыл бұрын

Haters gon hate

Nice 👍 to see you.

Have to say Professor... you speak perfectly fast as we do down here in New Zealand. Your thoughts on scale make all the difference and I wonder if in fact Einstein and Hawking could have used your ideas prior to them creating their theory's. Thanks for making this available.

@madzangels

7 жыл бұрын

Oh shutup

How would I go about asking Lisa Randall a question about dark matter ?

Yes you, you are very important for me.

Is a particle i.e. behaves like a particle rather than a wave, not a mass by dint of it being a particle?What is a particle if it is not a mass and not a wave?

Would it have killed the videographer to synchronize to the display and to connect to it for clearer and less flickery views of the slides?

Why does Gravity have to be generated from a "Force"? To me the discovery of the "Gravity Wave Ripple" by LIGO suggest more that it tends to support the idea that Gravity is an Entropic force, which Erik Verlinde is proposing.

Is that thick-ass bezel Pioneer a plasma? Does The Aspen Institute own a Kuro?

Dark matter is sophomoric. Mass exists in other dimensions and we are just observing its gravitational effects in our dimension.

Dark matter- is ballast ' at the bottom', atoms are superstructure which is keept in equilibrium the same with a ship to make it steady One has to put load right at the bottom of a ship...

I agree with Alan Hill.

4% means size we can see is only within that spectrum 4% wave is light. What is the remainder.

Smart, beautiful and passionate, a real life Ellie Arroway. Love you! ;-)

@zapfanzapfan

4 жыл бұрын

So, apparently I watched this 6 years ago and didn't compliment her excellent biceps :-) Really nice arms!

My tuppence worth, but this is very good.

It is true there are things we can't see however we can't even see what we have in fron of our eyes. The fundamental we humans have is that we try to characterize things by the look and our imagination and that brings confusion. Life is about discovering the inside of ourselves in conjunction with studying nature as it's pure way of being and little by little we start communicating not only with the eye but with feelings. This is the tool you I would describe as a magnifier. We must emitate nature as our way of life and the speed to discover and unravel the existing unknown would blow your mind. The entire system we live is corrupt and the harm it brings terrible. Money, power, self grandiose exist only in the imagination product of indoctrination at all levels. Money the tool to all selfishness.

Lets jump up to the next level - Time Travel

a musical tone created by the vibrating energy the strings inside quarks produces that determins what the particles turn into and the atom that created the band produced a note as it spun before the bang and the string inside the bang atom vibrated and made a not so there for my theory is music is the life creator :)

Why Jupiter is not orbiting around earth does size matter or the creation put it that way. Because gravity cannot explain this

Has she ever produced anything except writing a book? The LHC has now been looking more than 10 years for the 4th spacial dimension without finding anything.

Hierarchy problem Hierarchy problem is not solved yet. The problem is that why the mass of Higgs particle is lower than the mass of weak boson by big scale. The difference is big as 10th power of 10. The difference of mass is mysterious. The problem is also between renormalized mass and real mass. To pass through the problem is problem too. There are several proposal to the problem. But any of them is not complete and controversial. I have a speculation about it. The mass in 3 dimensional space such as in black hole and subatomic space has the energy equal to m c cubic. In 2 dimensional space mass has the energy of m c square. The difference is c. Almost the difference is hierarchy level. Difference is the difference of the vacuum energy of each space.

I've got a friend who "Fucking Loves Science" (that's some page on Facebook where people talk about liking science to appear intelligent.) Anyway, whenever I try to talk to them about physics, they get really REALLY mad at me & tell me they're not interested. Even to the point that they deny the notion that things like x-rays & microwaves are both electromagnetic waves, just like visible light. The difference, as Lisa explains here, is that the human eye is only sensitive to certain wavelengths of EM radiation. Whichever wavelengths can be seen are, of course, visible wavelengths.

@happylittlemonk

9 жыл бұрын

I also love science and found all academics are extremely hostile and arrogant. They think they own the universe and anyone claims they know as much or more about science are blasphemous. Science is just another branch of religion. Most of the stuff are abstract still and some even put Bible to shame. I tried to contact Prof Krauss 3 times about a very interesting discovery I made and never got a reply. I heard him say on couple of his youtube videos that people write to him everyday and they claim this and that, but they are all crackpots since they think they know more than us. Is this the what science is all about? preach science and then call EVERYONE crackpots if they try to show interest in it.

@happylittlemonk

9 жыл бұрын

***** I am currently working on my discovery and writing a book on it. Since I have had NO help from anyone obviously I am not going to disclose it so someone else can benefit from it.

@Manuelomar2001

8 жыл бұрын

+Michael Ordoukhani (HappyLittleMonk) no, science is not just another branch of religion. If you think that, you don't understand science at all.

@happylittlemonk

8 жыл бұрын

***** You have misunderstood me. I did not mean it literally. I do not believe in god at all. I just meant the attitude of scientist has become religious like. I was pointing out the difficulties I have faced and everyone alike who has ideas and tries to publicise them. No one cares to hear them and almost everyone is extremely hostile and rude as if I have offended their religion. You have also displayed this attitude. You jumped to conclusion and reacted as if I do not understand science, it is like your view is the centre of the universe and you can judge who is right and who is wrong. I NEVER judge any claim, I INVESTIGATE them with open mind and hold some reservation and respect. All these top scientists have no respect at all for others views. NO ONE has monopoly on views and intelligence or knowledge. That was my point.

So using the SPINNING PIPE GAS LENS (MIRAGE EFFECT HARNESSED )(unbreakable Lens) And pulsed intense lasers directed through the Gas Lens on a object create huge magnetic fields which in turn if organized correctly could induce currents in copper wires and generate electricity All this due to radiation friction IS THIS A NEW GENERATOR I HAVE INVENTED

If we can't see Dark matter "at all" like she says, that can't be true. If an invisible man was to rush by then you catch him by spraying paint onto the scoundrel. There, same with dark matter, just spray it with paint and it should show up.

@gmshadowtraders

9 жыл бұрын

***** Well if dark matter behaves the same as normal matter other than for the fact that light can't interact with it, then the spray paint would have to be anti-paint of some kind I'm guessing. Fight fire with fire as they say.

@SoulTouchMusic93

9 жыл бұрын

gmshadowtraders immagine it like a ghost it doesn't interact it means if you pass your hand through it it will go right through. and it's milions of light years away, it will take way too much time to get there the paint you mentioned (it's not as crazy as it seems your ideea btw)

@slugface322

9 жыл бұрын

gmshadowtraders Dark matter and dark energy were *made up* to attempt to account for the apparent missing mass that we can 'see'. Galaxy Rotation Curve en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy_rotation_curveAlthough I will not live to hear it, I'm sure there is a simple explanation.

@freeinformation9869

9 жыл бұрын

gmshadowtraders lol We can "see" it indirectly. Just like the invisible man analogy you made up. when he move furniture around and stuff, we see it. And that is good enough. The basic problem is, that we do not understand what it is.

@brippie

9 жыл бұрын

gmshadowtraders You are right about dark matter being made from scoundrel particles.

O zone is protective about earth and minus about center of core.

@venkateshbabu5623

6 жыл бұрын

Or oxygen.

our reality is as if we were living in a video game and some of the characters are pysicists who know about pixels and know that there is something else out there playing the game but will never be able to reach out a conclusion unless we manage to get out of the game through other dimensiosn.

Black holes are not black. At moss spheric conversion of intense light to X rays.

Adding gravity to the Standard Model will require a major change in physics that revolves around (accepting) the original idea in science that matter does not create Life, but rather Consciousness itself has Mass (Observer) and creates matter as was claimed long before modern science came along and is now generally rejected as "Religion" and the study of "God" (for good reasons of abuse), not Mass. The problem with the total rejection of a basic original idea that holds a true Inertial Frame of Reference in place shows science is rejecting what was once our main source of science and regarded as basic common sense that throughout History always prevails to some degree with corrections, not a major 100% complete rejection of the original observation. If the Observer has a center of gravity, then what does physics have to say about the bodies of matter creating it? To show the truth of which theory is correct the first and most obvious test (measurement) shows that almost all the matter and energy in the Universe is either missing..... or E and therefore G is relatively stronger the further back in time we look. And only one thing would cause that: Space forming in a harmonic octave structure where gravity is the result of two harmonic commas because the second harmonic comma attached to the graviton's oscillation phase in a second reverse arrow of time is bigger than the first so the entire 4th phase of Mass oscillation within a single unit of forward time (atom of 4 oscillation phases/parts) is not completely canceled out by the electron's oscillation phase. We see exactly what is happening and if you look in any modern book on electricity you will see the "missing" Graviton misnamed the "Hole" right where it should be next to the electron because atoms oscillate in space that is relative to time showing a blindness to the obvious is in effect as anything that oscillates in spacetime MUST have 4 phases/parts in time. There are 4 parts in an atom... and LIGO is pointing sideways to gravity. Sorry to be so blunt and obvious but these are major mistakes being made while radioactive waste from another melt down is leaking into the ocean this time. We need the graviton. Another test is to apply {a}, the asymmetry of the weak force value to the fine-structure constant showing 1/137 is the result of a ratio in balance: e{a} /t=hv. Equations using {a} add a second arrow of "tonal" space showing there are two arrows of opposite "tonal pitch" direction: one pointing in the (initial phase of electron) forward direction of the arrow of time, and the second arrow pointing in reverse to complete the oscillation cycle (the following graviton oscillation phase) showing E=T and like energy time must be conserved. Further evidence shows in September 2011 after years of testing (following FERMI Lab's own neutrino observations and Sommerfeld's 1948 observations of the photon noting the same stunning violation of SR) CERN announced Worldwide neutrinos were violating the fundamental law of relativity by exceeding the speed of light @ v-c/c=2.48e-5 sec in 453.6 miles. It's easy to prove the 2.48e-5 sec gain was caused by two harmonic commas that create the asymmetry of the weak force. In 453.6 miles as Stanford's SLAC E158 team discovered "using clocks" the asymmetry of the weak force adds 2.48e-5 sec in 453.6 mile to the forward arrow of time and 2.68e-5 to the .20e-5 sec longer second arrow associated with the graviton. If you add asymmetry to time you must see it show up in measurements of space. This means relative to the strong force where the photon's energy has been moved from the weak force via the space of the neutrino (where the neutrino is acting as the photon's anti-particle) E=m+{a}c2. Adding the asymmetry of the weak force value adds everything needed in the single cosmological constant created. The problems holding back physics from understanding gravity are not deep mysteries, they are simple obvious facts related to needed changes E=mc2 introduced in showing space is relative to time, and time is relative to the observer. No one ever stopped to rethink things..... and what it means to observe the source of light. When we look at light (weak force in stars etc.) we are obviously looking at a speed of light clock producing the light and the next question should have been: "why are our clocks moving?" The UFT equation that showed me this is what made me look for an asymmetry in the weak force, the only logical solution to having time while looking at a speed of light clock. I was astounded to not only find they had already detected the asymmetry within the weak force, but had it's data value posted as well that shows the asymmetry of the weak force adds one hour every thousand years so breaking that ratio down into the fraction of a second it takes light to travel 453.6 miles and seeing it match CERN's neutrino data creating the needed asymmetry space for the force of gravity in the proper phase cannot be a coincidence. If it was you would have heard of it right away as a Google search on SLAC E158 went to 100 pages in a few weeks from just a few search results prier to CERN's shocking announcement when the answer was posted and debated. It's sad Nature's moderator removed the hundreds of posts documenting this important Historic event but many copies were made and nothing beats CERN's later claim the data changing the picture of physics due to {a} was a big mistake caused by a loose cable that reaches back to the 40's. I did not mention in my posts G. Nimtz and A.A Stahlhofen findings supporting Sommerfeld's photon data using modern equipment. Evanescent modes have a purely imaginary wave number k that violates the Einstein relation E2 = (ħkc)2" without the asymmetry of the weak force added replacing more than the dice used to get around (and hide) the reality of real inertial frame based time that all motion is relative to. "Someone" reversed the symmetry of time to make E=mc2 work and got away with it because in one year the asymmetry of the weak force only adds 3.6 seconds a year to two arrows meaning with the force of gravity added (extra length to reverse arrow) less that 1.8 seconds are added to the forward arrow of time in one year (putting it in scale to see it) showing we live in a Universe of almost no time explaining why particles outlive their anti-particles. And as you would expect the detected known error in Newton's law is dealing with the same situation where F=m+{a}a. So V=I+{a}R and every equation in the basic summery is affected as well. But it's not as easy as applying it as it is to the simple neutrino that goes through matter as anyone can do the simple math to see it working, something that never happens in physics so I'd say Nature is up to something just as unusual. Does anyone with a degree in physics (today, this is an old theory lost along the way) aware that the E158 data matched CERN's "mistaken" neutrino data in 453.6 miles want to say the neutrino is not acting as the photon's anti-particle? It's not a true anti-particle, but it acts like one connecting the weak force to the strong force. It takes time to move time, and that takes space that adds time relative to the strong force. Relative to the weak force E=mc2, but not relative to the strong force where you must add the asymmetry of the weak force to create the single needed cosmological constant with two arrows supporting E=T while creating the ratio of the force of gravity. Until the 25 fundamental (at last count) "dimensionless" constants are understood to contain two arrows connected to time they will remain a mystery just like gravity.

And if I was a physicist. I'd everything I could to have dinner with this lady. She is cool. I don't think I could handle it.

While you were describing the extra dimension of space I had this thought Po, Extra Dimension(s) can be experienced in "theta" brain frequency. Po, [provocative operation ... explained in several Edward de Bono books]

If--and I stress if--our gravity is leaking into other dimensions, and that is the reason for its weakness (as some theories suggest) maybe an "eddy" of matter in another dimension is leaking gravity into our galaxies--kind of a template for the structure of galaxies in our universe. This might explain why dark matter is associated with galaxies. Sorry Roger Penrose--she's a lot better looking physicist--I'm sure Roger would have to agree! Thanks for posting video.

"Where do we go from here? ... the nature of space and time." Think about dark matter and Milgrom's work. www.weizmann.ac.il/weizsites/milgrom/ Mordehai (Moti) Milgrom, Weizmann Institute of Science HOW DID MILGROM CONVINCE McGAUGH AND KROUPA? According to Kroupa, Pawlowski, and Milgrom, "Understanding the deeper physical meaning of MOND remains a challenging aim. It involves the realistic likelihood that a major new insight into gravitation will emerge, which would have significant implications for our understanding of space, time and matter.” arxiv.org/pdf/1301.3907v1.pdf “The failures of the standard model of cosmology require a new paradigm”, Jan. 2013 www.weizmann.ac.il/weizsites/milgrom/ Mordehai (Moti) Milgrom, Weizmann Institute of Science "Everything happens as if MOND were the effective force law." - Stacy McGaugh www.astro.umd.edu/~ssm/mond/burn1.html "The MOND pages, Why Consider Mond?" www.astro.umd.edu/~ssm/mond/moti_bullet.html Milgrom's perspective on the Bullet Cluster "I was quite happy with the CCM, as everyone else ..." - Pavel Kroupa www.astro.uni-bonn.de/~pavel/kroupa_cosmology.html Pavel Kroupa: Dark Matter, Cosmology and Progress Google "space roar dark energy".

Is mass not a function of energy?

@horseofblack

7 жыл бұрын

i view mass as a dimension. not sure why physicists do not understand mass a dimension, except that Einstein refused to agree with Kaluza to calculate mass in it own dimension when trying to unify all the forces.

Space News. If you have not watched the other 2 videos I have posted then at least watch this one. kzread.info/dash/bejne/l2epy7RmcqysYKQ.html

Speaker tip for youtube later: repeat the questions.

I noticed her. (39:29)

The beef starts around 18:00

How would she describe a higgs particle. I did not think the answer she gave helped the guy that asked it. Is a "particle" a quantum of a wave in a field or is it not? I know that's an analogy but is it the best analogy or not (since we humans explain everything analogically or so it seems) It's an easy analogy to wrap ones mind around. But if we are going to be juvinile and talk about looks all I can say is that I am only seven years her senior but I just looked in the mirror and I look 25 years her senior so you go Lisa. Someone asked Bernard Shaw what, in his opinion, is the most beautiful thing in this world. “Youth,” he replied, “is the most beautiful thing in this world-and what a pity that it has to be wasted on children!” Well it is not wasted on Lisa.

@ProgressiveMovement200

7 жыл бұрын

Now that you mentioned it, she didn't really explain it well. When she made the analogy of the "EM Field" and a photon being popped out when it is disturbed suggests that the "Higgs Field" is not made of Higgs Bosons but when agitated it produces a Higgs Boson.

@fredflintstone2958

5 жыл бұрын

No, it wasn't. She's 56, now, and still looks ok. 12/27/2018.

also people In general have a 6th sense not talked about which animals also have..a person that yawns can trigger another person to yawn.. its a low energy pulse in our brains we have that pretty much no one knows about.. this 6th sense we have is in the beginning stage of evolutionary development now... it can be proven

In the 5-6 years since this video was posted, every hunt for dark matter has yielded negative results. In the meantime, normal matter that was once hidden from our prying eyes but is not now, due to our current technologies, is showing up everywhere in unexpected locations and quantities.

Smart Lady

The first property of dark matter is that they travel more than the speed of light. They are the first ones to get beyond light speed.

@venkateshbabu5623

6 жыл бұрын

They travel at speed approximately one second a galaxy.

More proof that STEM girls really do rock!

She is much easier on the eyes than Sir Stephen.

@davidmorse8432

5 жыл бұрын

@@theodosios2615 Shrek don't know much about theoretical physics but I get your point. Science can only speculate about it. We as humans only have limited perceptions because we are finite beings. You can't expect a finite being to perceive things that are infinite. But as you can see, man (or women) will wear themselves out trying. Got to give them credit for at least trying. Listening to this stuff makes me appreciate God so much more. He is infinite and all powerful, omniscient, omnipresent, magnanimous, and more. This is revealed to us by the things of nature.

the uni is 3 dimensional and time goes in 1 direction. simples. and why something came from nothing can't be answered at the present time

BUENOS DIAS

SALUDOS

@morgellonbetancor1453

9 жыл бұрын

saludos

My Ally is the Force

@Nineteen1900Hundred

7 жыл бұрын

And a powerful ally it is ?

@waltermcmain3461

6 жыл бұрын

My ally is a cardboard box.

This universe was made by a rip in space, then all matter came through and then sealed up.

I wonder what she bench presses

@truthsocialmedia

7 жыл бұрын

tree fiddy

@Nineteen1900Hundred

7 жыл бұрын

I think she's a climber.

@orangedac

6 жыл бұрын

200 pounds i'd wager.

@fredflintstone2958

5 жыл бұрын

@@DrTruffaldino Well....how much weight?

Smart and gorgeous

The camera operator should wake up and consistently show us the slides

As far as book suggestions goes ... If you are a complete ignoramous (not provoking - just for those who have self insight) - I suggest you read A Hitchhiker's Guide to The Galaxy. It is not going to teach you science, although Douglas Adams was careful to adhere to science, atleast in a comical way, but it will bring you to the right state of mind to start understanding science. Because reality is pretty f'ing weird

Why did congress kill the Texas collider?

@LukeA1223

5 жыл бұрын

They needed somewhere for the homless to live...

@zapfanzapfan

4 жыл бұрын

The cold war stopped... Also, an idiot congress man asked if it would find god... there is no IQ-test for congress...

Higgs is the coaxial circuit of the Inertial plane. Talking Counterspace on the other side of the Inertial plane. It's the Aether field.

Got a new theory that says the quantum vacuum is space not just a product of space.What I mean is if you could remove all of the quantum vacuum from inside and out from an atom that atom would become as large as the universe and display infinitely fast time.Of course there is no such thing as zero zero point energy.But to get you started thinking ask what would happen if you had a space ship that could not be slowed down dragging a cable and anchor that could not be broken by a black hole where the speed of light is 1/2 of ours.I say the ship would drag the entire black hole because to allow other wise would allow a faster than light effect that any astronaut in orbit at that level would observe and this is regardless how small the anchor or large the hole.I argue its why no particle accelerator can get anything to faster than light for the same reason.There is a lot to this theory so see my KZreads they are crude and incomplete but all I got for now.It says black hole become new universe's shows how the second law of thermodynamics is not violated,provides a better explanation for gravitational binding energy and so much more.

@MrCharlyAndy

6 жыл бұрын

It helps to become aware of one's lack of knowledge. You cannot learn a thing if you think you already know it and are wrong. Making stuff up is no substitute for inquiry.

Sorry Fermi Lab but you need to know it. Heisenberg was very, very Right , but Super-symmetry will put him down even in Force. For What? #FundamentalProton #Inertia #QuanticWaveAsymmetry . #Thanks

@mtre3854

8 жыл бұрын

#GoodMorningFuture , #GoodMorningNextDay , #goodmorningworld Was I right? #PressRelease #News #IonMurguCUTandPT345Resonator #Nobel #CERN #NASA Sorry Fermi Lab but you need to know it. Heisenberg was very, very Right , but Super-symmetry will put him down even in Force. For What? #FundamentalProton #Inertia #QuanticWaveAsymmetry . #thanks #AmericanScienceThesauri #HumansScienceThesauri

@BartAlder

8 жыл бұрын

+MTRE SuperSymmetry has zero evidence supporting it. And Fermi Lab hasn't been at the forefront of particle physics research in over a decade.

@mtre3854

8 жыл бұрын

Bart Alder unfortunately this idea can send physics for a long time in an blind area I cry for it. I am not mather or father of science, but already this danger is making fixism

@mtre3854

8 жыл бұрын

Bart Alder yes maybe I didn't t mentioned first , you are right zero evidence for sure and neither famous experiment about entanglement didn't say nothing about , but nobody want to bring it back in attention , and it is the real danger for our Science - maybe already can say Nobel institution lost Nobel Legacy? I ask.

@ionmurgu783

8 жыл бұрын

+Star Trek Theory is theirs problem, I made only an invitation- see down power of mind our soul is love

Their are too many dark matter objects in the cosmos. Our universe is one such collision of two huge dark matter objects and ever expanding because of splitting dark matter objects release huge energy gradients.

Lisa I sent to you a lot, don't let my single there, Physics need you. I meet Heisenberg at #TheBase .

we get another toll I know for a small time will take out attention about relativity, but is for a relax. see down

@ionmurgu783

8 жыл бұрын

+Ion Murgu #math #mathematics #matematica #physics #science #HumanityScienceThesaurus #AmericanScienceThesaurus #EuropeanScienceThesaurus #infinitydivergentconjecture #Inertia #IonMurguCUTandPT345Resonator #FundamentalProton #newsletter #newspaper #news #eternity #bbcnews #msnbc #academy #usanews #americannews #globalnews #TheBiggestHumanDiscoveryForAlltimes #astrophysics #cosmology #relativity #BigBang #bigbangtheory #universe #peace#ThefutureBegin #goodmorningfuture We Get The Infinity. We need peace to stand up as humanity in. Message of Peace for humanity. www.climaticdisorder.com/test/InfinityG/IMigener.htm www.climaticdisorder.com/test/getInfinity/getinfinity.htm

Scale matters, I knew it

@DavidAKZ

9 жыл бұрын

thought there are some interesting physical models on which scale independence is based.

@madzangels

7 жыл бұрын

Oh shutup

@fredflintstone2958

5 жыл бұрын

Ha, ha! Good one!

she got bigger muscles than me

@scottschirkofsky4387

10 жыл бұрын

work on it! :-)

@unholygod4895

10 жыл бұрын

i wish i had the time mate more important things to do mind you i dont really need too the roided look aint for me

@zenhalcyon

9 жыл бұрын

i should be ashamed to admit it, but her nice form and face drew my attention to this video (in combination with subject matter). she has beautiful arms, regardless of gender. sorry about your flaps.

@hjembrentkent6181

9 жыл бұрын

She looks very strong

@Manuelomar2001

9 жыл бұрын

UNHOLY GOD she isn't "roided". She looks that way because she goes rock climbing often. That's how people who take care of themselves look.

Suspect print detail flow yellow major brother curriculum.

@quantumcat7673

5 жыл бұрын

?

kookooo

I love the dress. She is beautiful. She is brilliant. She is divine. The dinosaurs protect her. Oh well.

Massive schnoz

dimension

Universe expands so is dark energy.