Outtakes are here: kzread.info/dash/bejne/lKiTqMqaqszVgto.html

@dillonb8019

2 жыл бұрын

PGC sweat

@sumerbc7409

2 жыл бұрын

How dare you attack Interview with a Vampire ! My verdict? CinamaSins Fatality!

@fredashay

2 жыл бұрын

Why did they change the title from _"Interview With _*_A_*_ Vampire"_ to _"Interview With _*_The_*_ Vampire"_ ???

@sumerbc7409

2 жыл бұрын

@@fredashay holy crap you're right. Notice my post also says that? It's one of those Matrix shifts that no one notices. I saw it live and it was definitely Interview with A vampire.

@joesjoeys

2 жыл бұрын

I rather enjoy Interview with a Vampire. At least it treats us to a more realistic view than a bunch of sparkly bois!

Kirsten Dunst really blew me away in this movie. She was only eleven years old, yet she convincingly played an immortal woman, trapped for eternity in a child's body, and played that anguish to perfection!

@cwtrain

2 жыл бұрын

*"WHICH ONE OF YOU DID IT?!"*

@keyaunna.

2 жыл бұрын

she is incredible in her role.

@JMwhocares

2 жыл бұрын

@Xi Vonoc chill

@kedakat

2 жыл бұрын

@Xi Vonoc are you cus he just said that lol

@halosandheroes

2 жыл бұрын

"i wanna see your Vampager" and Karen was born

Louis was like “im leaving you Lestate”. Lestate: “ im pregnant and it’s your baby”

@scipioafricanus5871

Жыл бұрын

where is Maury when you need him: "You're NOT the father!"

@jbvader721

Жыл бұрын

Well, when you put it that way...

@kerrieohanlon2663

Жыл бұрын

If you enjoy vampire books you should read Dracul, a prequel to Dracula written by Dacre Stoker who is the grandson of Bram stokers brother Thornley and is based on Bram stokers notes for a book he was planning on writing himself. It really is a great read

@Jezzrah

2 ай бұрын

@joeguy1092 I legit just spit my drink at that. 🤣

@lawfulhusbands

22 күн бұрын

Lestat totally baby trapped Louis lmao

15:41 according to the book, Lestat had no money when he arrived in the new world, and part of his attraction to louis was the wealth and property that Lois held. So Lestat was looking for a Sugar daddy.

@shanchan8247

2 жыл бұрын

Yep, Lestat was an opportunist.

@frnknstndrgqn

2 жыл бұрын

that was louis' perception. Lestat actually still had a shit ton of money, it's funny cuz in "the vampire lestat" book when lestat reads "interview with the vampire" in that world he talks about all the things louis got wrong. lol like vehemently bitches about it 🤣🤣

@jf2801

2 жыл бұрын

@@frnknstndrgqn well, two sides to every story, so his side could be equally embellished and false. He's got quite the ego, either way, it seems. Wouldn't be too out of character, given the context of both books. 🤷‍♂️

@ksy4747

2 жыл бұрын

@@frnknstndrgqn I read "vampire Lestat" before reading "interview with vampire". Needless to say I ended up hating Louis and couldn't stand his incessant whinning...

@frnknstndrgqn

2 жыл бұрын

@@ksy4747 I didn't hate him but Lestat was way more fun of a character. Their dynamic later on was more fun.

Claudia is literally the baby Lestat tried to use to save their marriage.

Cinemasins taking the time to shout out talented people in movies who aren’t the super famous lead role, is everything I needed. Special effects crews get no love from the public. They are the reason movies and ideas can come to life on the screen.

@thalmoragent9344

2 жыл бұрын

True, all that work in many of these movies should be praised more, seperate from the actual screenwriters or directors

@sirenofthesea7802

2 жыл бұрын

@@thalmoragent9344 Special effects department, costume department, makeup department, they all deserve a standing ovation for all the work they put into a production. No matter if it's a film, TV series, or a stage performance, they deserve recognition for their work!

@LucianDevine

2 жыл бұрын

It was definitely a nice nod to both a man and the professions as a whole! People always talk about actors and directors while complaining about writers, but everybody else working behind the scenes to make these movies come to light generally get forgotten.

@tyrone5969

2 жыл бұрын

Completely agree. Someone who's done key work on those movies should receive just as much recognition as the directors and actors. The entire crews deserve recognition for the incredible, and incredibly exhausting, work that they do. The crews are working 24/7 in the unseen roles which both create and support the projects. But they never receive any appreciation.

@EMurph42

2 жыл бұрын

👏👏👏👏👏

Fun Fact : Author Anne Rice initially detested the casting of Tom Cruise as Lestat, but promptly apologised when she saw his performance.

@aclockworktangerine4465

2 жыл бұрын

I've read all the books and have seen the movies, this by far has to be the best they did. Was actually pretty damn close to the books imo. Can also understand Anne Rice's initial concerns but Tom Cruise did a really good job, he was pretty spot on with the character written in the novel imo.

@DellSnooze

2 жыл бұрын

@@aclockworktangerine4465 imo your opinion is correct 👌

@the1bizkit

2 жыл бұрын

Absolutely. Was he the Lestat from the rest of the series, no. But that was the point, it was told from Louis' POV, so it had bias and Tom Cruise knocked it out of the park. Also I love how more than half the sins are explainable from reading the book, but absolutely it couldn't fit all the exposition from it in the film, so the sins must flow!

@lisemzarate4029

2 жыл бұрын

I still would have preferred Brad as Lestat but Tom did do a good job

@nelliethursday1812

2 жыл бұрын

She wanted Rutger Hauer in the part

"all he's done is mope around and brood sexily into the void" yeah, that pretty much describes Louis, in the books too

@emipexu2779

7 ай бұрын

And i love every second of it🙏

Um, Bram Stoker did NOT write his vampire's being vulnerable to sunlight. That wasn't a thing until the early 1900s when the creators of Nosferatu couldn't get the license for Dracula, and had to invent a new method of killing their vampire. Stoker's Dracula simply couldn't use most of his powers during the day, but he absolutely could move around in direct sunlight without harm.

@whatashirtshow2636

2 жыл бұрын

As I recall the turned humans might not have been able to withstand the sun though, the brides. In Bram Stoker's version Dracula was the progenitor of Vampires. In Anne Rice's novels the progenitor, what was her name? Akasha! She and Enkil were unaffected by sunlight as well. I like Mr. Stoker's Dracula very much... probably Gary Oldman's performance has much to do with that but I read the book before seeing the movie.

@keithwoodcrest

2 жыл бұрын

But this is CinemaSins though.. where actual facts don't matter because Jeremy and his staff don't know shit lol

@khodexus4963

2 жыл бұрын

@@keithwoodcrest Which is why corrections are so appropriate. He might not care, but I bet some in the audience do.

@Egilhelmson

2 жыл бұрын

You realize that Anne Rice is not licensing “vampires” from Bram Stoker, either? And that Stoker didn’t invent the vampire, even in English literature? If she wants her vampires to be vulnerable to sunlight but not crucifixes, that is her business. Literally. Figuratively. Economically.

@khodexus4963

2 жыл бұрын

@@Egilhelmson I wasn't criticizing Rice. I was criticizing a comment CinemaSins made, attributing the vulnerability to sunlight idea to Stoker, when that's not where it originated from.

8:31 the books actually explain that Claudia was indeed already infected with the plague after being around her dying/dead mother. So Louis' choice was to either let her suffer from sickness (and probably die), or turn her. He became overcome by her scent and drank from her, leaving her even closer to death. That's when Lestat comes in and pushes Louis to finish the job and fully turn her, knowing that having a "daughter" would make Louis more loyal to him.

@KnowledgeSeeker78491

Жыл бұрын

Which book gave this account?

@heart756

11 ай бұрын

Yes In the books Claudia was just 5 yrs old reason why she was ill didn’t realized her momma was dead also Claudia was in sort of a shock she was very young, when Louis encountered her and fed of her, then is turned into a vampire; (by Lestat did to Keep Louis to not leave) Claudia does grows mentally Regardless her body Claudia Thinks and feels as a grown woman unfortunately stuck in a child’s body.

Ah yes, the movie that sparked the "people really want to f*ck vampires" craze, long before Twilight came along 😁

@marcusgray6501

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly!!

@YourMoonJoy

2 жыл бұрын

Nah that started with Rodger Everts 1931 version. The original sexy vamp, don't also forget the sapphic masterpiece that is Carmilla.

@cynthiasmith2459

2 жыл бұрын

Haha! Yeah!!

@LadyOnikara

2 жыл бұрын

@@YourMoonJoy And "Love At First Bite". 1979 with George Romero!

@LnPPersonified

2 жыл бұрын

@@sumerbc7409 It worked for me! Hail Satan!

Oh come on, you still gotta love one of the final lines: ‘Louie, Louie, Louie, still WHINING Louie!’ Figured they’d at least get a sin off for honesty?

The real problem with Armand is well... he's supposed to be a gorgeous auburn haired teenage boy not much older than Claudia, like it's a whole thing that he personally gets how fucked up it is that they turned her that young.

@dawnmidnightsun2521

Жыл бұрын

Armand was supposed to be younger yes. But Claudia was 6 when she was turned. Edit: whoops off by a year, I haven't listened to the book in awhile 😅. Claudia was 5. Either way she was aged up to 10 in the movies so not alot of book to film accuracy.

@rowan1922

Жыл бұрын

claudia was 5. armand was 17ish

@rowan1922

Жыл бұрын

@@dawnmidnightsun2521 claudia was 5

@jbvader721

Жыл бұрын

You can do that stuff in a book but in a movie...good luck with that.

"it sure seems like Louis solves all his problems by burning the house down.." Yes. Literally yes. He just does that. The movie actually *omits* a fourth scene of him burning another building down in Paris in this book. (Plus others in books that have not been adapted).

@Libellulaire

2 жыл бұрын

That's how I like to solve things too. You get rid of everything, and you can rebuild on top if needed. It's perfect.

@tyrone5969

2 жыл бұрын

He really takes the whole KILL IT WITH FIRE thing literally, doesn't he?

@Rob_Thorsman

2 жыл бұрын

I love how in the fourth book Louis lives in a small hovel and Lestat burns it down! >:-)

@Kelarys

2 жыл бұрын

If a fire doesn't solve all your problems it just wasn't big enough

@FunZies.

2 жыл бұрын

@@Kelarys Wait, which? The fire, or the problem?

I like the part when his slaves revolted against him. He was like, you are right your master is the devil. And of course Kristen Dunst her performance was excellent. Tom Cruise was like how many times do I have to tell you not in the house.

@jazwaz112

2 жыл бұрын

he was like "you are right" only bc of his shame at being a vampire killing his house servant for blood. he didn't actually care much about their slavery plight, the revolt just fed his desire for suicide.

I always felt bad for the woman burned with Claudia. She was a vampire for 45 minutes and didn't have anything to do with their crime.

@made-line7627

Жыл бұрын

Yep, that troupe just killed a fellow vampire who *hadn't* actually committed any crimes. Massive hypocrites

@natiliee.s.5476

Жыл бұрын

In the book she had been a vampire for weeks. Louis was training her in the ways of the vampire.

I am permanently convinced that Tom Cruise made a deal with the devil, for this one movie of perfect acting. Each time I watch it, I CONSTANTLY forget that he plays Lestat, because Lestat is the actor to me.

@lainiwakura1776

2 жыл бұрын

he made a deal with Xenu.

@laurengibson748

2 жыл бұрын

@@lainiwakura1776 Are you going to keep copy and pasting almost the same comment everywhere?

@adrian72300

2 жыл бұрын

Agreed, nobody will ever accuse Tom Cruise of being a great actor, he's a great action star, but great actor? nah

@Talamasca007

2 жыл бұрын

Cruise definitely played Lestat as Lestat described himself, not at Louis saw him. It was an excellent portrayal.

@iilhares

2 жыл бұрын

@@adrian72300 Y'know, for me it's his role in Tropic Thunder. I had no idea it was him until I saw his name in the credits.

Fun fact: In the novels, Armand looks like a child himself, and is not Lestat's creator. In Queen of the Damned he's sired by Marius but (again) in the books Marius meets Lestat after he's already a vampire. Lestat's creator was some crazy ancient vampire Lestat met in a cave. The vampire turned Lestat then immediatly died...hence Lestat getting all pissy when Louey demands answers.

@sleepysera

2 жыл бұрын

The novels were a whole different level of mindf*ckery tbh

@kedakat

2 жыл бұрын

Armand was 16 years old when Marius made himade him he had to because he was poisoned also also Lestat was Stolen in the middle of the night by an old vampire and turned he did not go to a cave And yes the vampire who turned him immediately jumped into the fire after

@kedakat

2 жыл бұрын

And yes he was already a vampire when he met Maurice

@sabojezles

2 жыл бұрын

The books are really good, the first three at least, I left half-way through Body Thief, gotta go back and finish the whole thing.

@fadeblac5633

2 жыл бұрын

I couldn't get through Queen of the Damned. I need to buy the book.

When I was in the theater and the "Armand and Louie get super close to each other" scene happened, literally half the theater yelled "kiss!" then groaned when they didn't.

@jazzfarer

2 жыл бұрын

@Ks I know, right? We were in a laid-back area in Hawaii, so that might have had something to do with it. I was really young, and let me tell you, that experience did NOT prepare me for what was lurking outside that wonderful little bubble.

@jessicabell8838

2 жыл бұрын

In the book they did kiss

@terrasmith8371

2 жыл бұрын

Weird, in my theater everyone was like "wtf no" when they nearly kissed, then loudly relieved when they didn't. It was 1994 where I lived...

@jazzfarer

2 жыл бұрын

@Ks I remember waiting in line and hearing a LOT of people excitedly talking about the book. Even the group I was with--we were all fans. Maybe that made a difference as well?

@zyxwh185

Жыл бұрын

@Sky Mile shut up

I am not a fan of Tom Cruise, but he embodies Lestat perfectly. A true “brat prince” as Lestat is later known in the series.

If I remember correctly, Claudia meets Madeleine at a doll shop. We don’t see it, but there’s a brief scene in which she crosses the street and you can see Madeleine in the shop ( through the window). It ties into all the dolls Claudia is collecting. Also , since they have lived there for years, Madeleine realized that Claudia wasn’t aging . I could be wrong though…

@PersephoneDaSilva

2 жыл бұрын

I'm pretty sure Louis turns Madeleine. Claudia asks about it, Louis tells her, and not long after, they all get snatched by the theater vampires.

@dracaryssnow6973

2 жыл бұрын

@@PersephoneDaSilva we aren’t talking about the same thing bro. I’m talking about HOW Claudia met Madeleine . Unless you meant to reply to someone else

@PersephoneDaSilva

2 жыл бұрын

@@dracaryssnow6973 But what I'm saying is that there's too much of a time gap for that to be Madeline.

@dracaryssnow6973

2 жыл бұрын

@@PersephoneDaSilva I still don’t know what you’re talking about dude. It’s very clear that Louis turns Madeleine: it happens on camera. So…

@terrasmith8371

2 жыл бұрын

Yes. In the books Madeline only makes one doll.. they're all incarnations of the same child (her dead daughter).. which she makes over and over in her shop. Claudia asked her to make an "adult" doll for her with grown woman body parts and Madeline does. The two keep in touch and I guess become friends. Later Claudia chooses her to be her companion so the two can flee Paris before the Theater vamps can kill her for killing Lestat. Louis turns her. They all 3 live together awhile before the Theater vamps kill the two women.

"my friend IS a priest, he'll hear your sins before you die" I f'king LOVE Tom Cruise in this

@NSnicket

2 жыл бұрын

That’s the first scene of the film I ever saw and I was blown away by how perfect he was in this role.

@fadeblac5633

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, he really did a Great job. They did a wonderful job in Casting.

@BennyLlama39

2 жыл бұрын

Refresh my memory... was that the scene where the chick is in a coffin, then Cruise says something to the effect of "Enjoy it; most of us never get to know what it's like." ?

@LeylandFoizey

2 жыл бұрын

@@BennyLlama39 oh yeah, he spins around on the coffin and that Spanish guitar plays..so good

@LeylandFoizey

2 жыл бұрын

Its always been my favorite scene; Lestat trying to teach Louis to kill

Christian Slater donated his pay to River Phoenix's charities. River was originally casted as the interviewer.

@fadeblac5633

2 жыл бұрын

Now that I never knew. I loved River in "My own private Idaho." But that was very nice of Christian Slater.

@buffytheinternetbullyslayer

2 жыл бұрын

Awww… that’s very nice of him to do

@madquest8

2 жыл бұрын

Considering how Slater's career went, maybe he should have kept the money!

@That90sGirl310

2 жыл бұрын

@@madquest8 Is there a reason his career went the way it did?

@madquest8

2 жыл бұрын

@@That90sGirl310 No idea. I just remember him from Kuffs and Heathers LOL And a terrible Alone in the Dark movie.

An accurate description of every anne rice character, “brooding sexily”.

@jbvader721

Жыл бұрын

And then Stephenie Meyer came along and said, "Hold my sparkles!"

The fact that they kill the child and new “mother” vampire, surely is them breaking their own don’t kill your own kind rule? She had nothing to do with Lestat, but they just burn her with Claudia and I’m just not sure what the damn rules are!

@ivyindigovlogs5312

2 жыл бұрын

IKR! Like she gets burned, but Louis who ya know, helped with the murder gets to chill in a sealed up coffin for years?

@PersephoneDaSilva

2 жыл бұрын

Claudia slit Lestat's throat open. Louis did everything else.

@ajfiveohfour

2 жыл бұрын

I’ve always hated that scene. Claudia’s scream was more than enough reason to but Madeline receiving a death sentence for what, being a vampire for less than 12 hours? But I think logically, the answer was Armand ordered Claudia dead and when they grabbed Madeline (I think in the book she had been around longer) he gave them the green light to eliminate her too (knowing Louis would kill everyone anyway)

@originalcosmicgirl

2 жыл бұрын

It's like irl. We have laws against people killing each other, yet capital punishment exists. Those in power are often hypocritical.

@candie1230

2 жыл бұрын

Armand was behind it. He wanted Louis for himself, and thought if he could get Claudia out of the way, Louis would be his.

I love how, in an early _True Blood_ episode, the spokesperson for vampires is asked about vampire weaknesses, and asked about stakes through the heart. The spokesperson calmly replies how that a stake through the heart would kill just about _anyone..._

@jackieelizabeth8614

2 жыл бұрын

Same in Hotel Transylvania "yeah well who wouldn't that kill"

@droth1031

2 жыл бұрын

That was also in a comedy called "My Best Friend is a Vampire", which I'm fairly sure predates both...

@AudieHolland

2 жыл бұрын

A gruesome incident occurred somewhere in the Central Europe I believe, after a burial of a few persons in the local churchyard, rumours went up that the buried persons were actually vampires. A group of brave volunteers, led by the local priest, made their way to the churchyard and dug up the bodies. They found that all bodies showed no signs of decay and some even had blushes on their cheeks. The priest read out a few prayers for the dead, holding a cross over the bodies, then declaring: "This is your Lord, Jesus Christ, who died for your sins." At that, one of the bodies seemed to shed a few tears. When the priest was finished the others hastily drove wooden stakes through the (un)dead bodies at which each one emitted a horrifying scream. The recently buried persons were probably still not dead after they were dug up. They were probably in some sort of permanent sleep paralysis so they could hear and feel everything around them, they just couldn't respond. Untill they drove stakes through those unfortunate people. Probably for the better. A *lot* of people were buried alive before the advent of modern medicine, early 20th Century.

@treystephens6166

2 жыл бұрын

@@AudieHolland do you think Vampires are real?

@AudieHolland

2 жыл бұрын

@@treystephens6166 If you read my reply, you'd know I don't. But people back in the time, even the most rational, may have had serious doubts and kept crufixes and garlic at hand just in case.

Fun Fact: Norm Macdonald best ranked this movie on SNL at the time as " Not Gay Enough."

@daBEAGLE1017

2 жыл бұрын

......or so his doghouse would have us believe.

@bobjenkins4925

2 жыл бұрын

Deeply closeted gay man, Norm Macdonald.

@daBEAGLE1017

2 жыл бұрын

@@bobjenkins4925 yep, Norm would never admit to being gay.

@theignorantninja

2 жыл бұрын

@@daBEAGLE1017 Obviously not; he was deeply closeted. I actually heard a wild rumor that he was caught having gay sex with a very recognizable celebrity. I think everybody should be able to predict who it was. You guessed it. Frank Stallone.

@macia.3512

2 жыл бұрын

But it's soooo true 😅

There's a lot that can be criticised about this movie but Kirsten Dunst's acting was *phenomenal* and casting Tom Cruise was an A+ decision. Can't imagine Lestat as anyone else.

I don't care what you say. This was a great movie. And if you've ever read the novels, Tom Cruise was perfectly cast as Lestat.

@treystephens6166

2 жыл бұрын

I agree I have it on DVD, VHS & Laserdisc.

@marniesutton9553

2 жыл бұрын

100% 180 degrees disagree with you about Tome Cruise. He ruined the whole thing, ESPECIALLY if you read the novels!

@krabbykat9918

2 жыл бұрын

this movie is definitely one of a kind. This stupid cinemasins guy is just going tumblr now. being politically correct and woke and just hating on good movies esp with an all white cast.

@krabbykat9918

2 жыл бұрын

@@marniesutton9553 I've read the novels and he played the role perfectly.

@serenecatweather5694

2 жыл бұрын

@@krabbykat9918 agreed!

I haven't seen this movie in full ever, but just the end clip with Lestat attacking the interviewer, thus confirming he isn't dead and gone forever, idk why but it gives me big "that one meme from brother bear" vibes, i.e. Louis: That's how I lost my dear Lestat Lestat (from the other room): quit telling everyone I'm dead Louis: sometimes I can still hear his voice

@tiaferrandino4881

2 жыл бұрын

I wish Anne put that in the script. (And the book. LOL)

@STAWTEREHWYREVE-dx7si

5 күн бұрын

🤣

Cruise was PERFECTLY cast. I’m not a huge fan but I can’t picture anyone else in this role. He’s so damn good.

@ayaehab

2 жыл бұрын

same here! I can't stand his acting at all, but damn I love him as Lestat

@NSnicket

2 жыл бұрын

@@ayaehab see I honestly think he’s a great actor and it just gets overshadowed by his personal life. Stuff like this role really shows that for me. He cracked me up in Tropic Thunder as well and I loved that it showed he could laugh at himself. That always earns someone some points in my book.

@Knight-of-Sarcasm

2 жыл бұрын

I railed against it at first! How could they! Tom Cruise! Seriously? My opinion on his acting wasn't too high at that point. Interview changed that. He modeled the Prince perfectly.

@lucbrisson2

2 жыл бұрын

I agree. The issue is not miscasting, but the fact he's been typecasted for a long time now. Interview, Rain man, Tropic Thunder and even Austin Powers (and many others) prove he has acting range, but he is mostly known for he's Mission Impossible clones.

@julz3tt3

2 жыл бұрын

Agreed. This was his golden age of acting. Early 90s

"I am the oldest living vampire in the world." (Cries in Akasha.)

@scienceface8884

2 жыл бұрын

Marius, still bothering to get out of bed every evening even though he grew up watching the Roman republic become the Roman empire: *shrugs in Latin*

@MrHawkelement

2 жыл бұрын

@@scienceface8884 Sounds like an entertaining way to grow up at least. lol

@calamityang

2 жыл бұрын

Tru dat

FUN FACT: at the time of this movie Antonio Banderas knew no English at all except for the lines he had to learn to say in the script Another FUN FACT: this movie is perfect!!

@christinamarcet1780

2 жыл бұрын

He had been in the Mambo Kings a few years prior in a co-starring role -- that was a phonetical learning for him. He was also in Philadelphia (the movie) a year before Interview. I think by the time Interview came around he had had some practice with English

@4:48 YES vampires have the ability to suppress the pain of the bite and induce extreme pleasure from it. it's a core ability that they all have. probably the most important one, to be seductive.

@mexicanspec

2 жыл бұрын

It was described in later books their capacity to mentally control the victim.

@BlackCatBritt

2 жыл бұрын

came looking for this comment so I didnt have to say it myself lol. It's definitely true that the books explain the bite as a sort of aphrodisiac. Which tbh, helps explain a lot of the homoeroticism that inherently takes place throughout the story lol

Kirsten Dunst stole the show, outperforming two of the biggest stars in history, at 11 years old. She's hands down the best part of this movie. Probably the best part of any of Anne Rice's works adapted for the screen. At 11 years old.

@Briansgate

2 жыл бұрын

No doubt! She really sunk her teeth into the role!

@kayamerrick3907

2 жыл бұрын

Cruise and Pitt are Stars, yes, but no one would ever mistake them for being talented actors. Kirsten was and is a talented actress and Claudia is such a fantastic character so it’s easy to understand why Kirsten stole the show 😁

@praxton

2 жыл бұрын

This was not Cruise's or Pitt's best performance. Kirsten was great, but Pitt hadn't come into his own yet as an actor and Cruise was, I agree, miscast. It wasn't a good role for him.

@NyxBorn7080

2 жыл бұрын

You're joking right ✅️

@youdontknowme5980

2 жыл бұрын

@@kayamerrick3907 Umm Pitt and Cruise are talented, she was just given a role were you get to shine more, the hardest it is to play a role that brighter it shines when you play it well.

“…why Claudia is Bart-Simpsoning her way through life.” Probably the best line I’ve heard on CS ever.

Vampires can’t pee. One of the first things Lestat does after getting a human body in a book is relieve himself. It takes him some doing since it’s been centuries

Part of the problem is that Anne Rice rectonned a lot of this story when she realized she liked Lestat better as a protagonist. Turns out he usually feeds on criminals, as do most of the "good" vampires. Louis is actually something of an exception given his self loathing an depression and considers such behavior hypocritical since murder is still murder.

@stefanfilipovits21

2 жыл бұрын

Oh god the retcons are so bad. The parents/Replimoids and who/what Amel really is so SO dumb.

@Knight-of-Sarcasm

2 жыл бұрын

@@stefanfilipovits21 I stopped at Body Thief. I admit to remembering only portions of that one; at least I recall the 1st 3. For what Tom found in the books, I think he did amazing and captured the feel of Lestat from Interview (the book). The Brat Prince. Anne did too in the end. And Brad caught Louis--even though his BO drove the rest of the cast nuts! Pitts' pits!

@princeofcupspoc9073

2 жыл бұрын

You mean "retconned Lestat" when the audience liked him more, so she made him the main character to sell more books. What we have here is a hack versus a novelist. I vote hack.

@stefanfilipovits21

2 жыл бұрын

@@Knight-of-Sarcasm I like Memnoch quite a lot but after Prince Lestat And The Realms Of Atlantis i think im done.

@lainiwakura1776

2 жыл бұрын

@@princeofcupspoc9073 Yeah, now he's based on her dead husband. I still hate him and always have.

Kirsten Dunst deserved a golden globe for her acting. She's the best character with the best performance in it.

This movie right here is the only time I ever enjoyed Tom Cruise’s acting and found Brad Pitt attractive. Seriously, though, Lestat is portrayed EXACTLY as I had pictured him in the book.

@dominikschneeweihs9538

2 жыл бұрын

could not agree more

@FramesPerSecond

2 жыл бұрын

Give Thelma and Louise a watch for Pitt and Collateral a watch for Cruise.

@Ivy94F

2 жыл бұрын

I agree wholeheartedly. When I first heard about the casting, I always felt that the roles should be reversed. That was mostly based on their physical features described in the book, and I still do. But Cruise’s performance was exactly the way lestat was described, and you can tell he really gets the character.

@catonkybord7950

2 жыл бұрын

That one and "Edge of Tomorrow".

So glad you took off a sin For Kirsten's performance, she was utterly amazing. Also funnily enough I recently saw a a gag comic about a guy pointing out that the moon reflects the sun as he was about to be bitten and the vampire then turns to dust, lol.

Louis didn't just turn on the lights. He did it at super-speed. Now, admittedly the special effects to depict this super-speed were poorly done, but I doubt the "local drunk" could have done that. The statue didn't actually move. It was a form of psychic power. Louis was looking back through time to see the model who originally posed for the statue. The artist captured a tiny bit of her soul and Louis could see it. Yes, old New Orleans had tons of prostitutes. They hung red lanterns in their windows to advertise their profession; hence the term "Red Light District."

@tim6454

2 жыл бұрын

Thank god somebody other than me knew what the statue scene meant

@starbrand3726

2 жыл бұрын

@@tim6454 I'll admit when I first saw the movie in the theater, I also didn't get it. But, later on DVD, I re-watched it and it just clicked. ☺

@Babolful

2 жыл бұрын

I understood it as a way to show there's a whole other world than human can't access to, but your explanation makes more sense! Agreed on the prostitute, and even if there wasn't THAT much historically, seems logical that night creatures would have easy access to, well the night world

@scienceface8884

2 жыл бұрын

That would be a nice explanation for that statue scene, but Loui never developed any of the psychic talents. He was notorious for it, and it's theorized by other vampires that he outright refuses to develop them out of self hatred.

@starbrand3726

2 жыл бұрын

@@scienceface8884 Very true. Louis was literally just born and out of instinct he used his psychic ability to see the statue. But, like you pointed out, because of self hatred, he never fully developed his abilities or ever used them again.

anyone can agree that the actors in this movie look absolutely incredible in their roles. these were all def crushes to women and gay men alike.

@Knight-of-Sarcasm

2 жыл бұрын

Antonio's appearance always irked me, but it was redeemed by his skills in the role. Armand's appearance iirc was that of a blonde cherub?

@scienceface8884

2 жыл бұрын

@@Knight-of-Sarcasm redheaded teenage pretty boy, and I had the same reaction: it's different, so I inherently dislike it, but "Film Armand" is very much in line with the spirit of the original work and I like him as his own character.

@Knight-of-Sarcasm

2 жыл бұрын

@@scienceface8884 Thank you. In my inner mind I had the blonde cherub even before QotD placed that quiet actor in the role. They really should have introduced them more I swear in that movie. I'm mad about the Hollywood sign deletion; but even more origins would have been nice. I guess they contributed nothing to the film but you do wonder why they're there.

@nivircescrittore8304

2 жыл бұрын

@@scienceface8884 There was a reason behind the change. This movie has a *lot* of gay subtext and sexual undertones, including between Armand and Louis. The producers very wisely thought that a teenage-looking Armand and a very adult-looking Louis having sexual undertones with each other was not a very good idea to show in the big screen "he's technically 400 years old" or not - specially when you take into account that a lot of anti-gay stuff basically calls gay men crypto-pedos and being anti-gay was big around the time the movie was made. If they kept Armand a teenager they would risk playing it into the anti-gay narrative.

@scienceface8884

2 жыл бұрын

@@nivircescrittore8304 I can understand why something happened and still dislike that it happened. Those aren't mutually exclusive.

"Well, he should stop by Sunnydale at some point. They're LOADED over there." LOL 😂

@velvety2006

2 жыл бұрын

didn't spike say Dracula still owed him money 🤣and that it was his fault everybody knows about all the vampire weaknesses?

@DiscoRaptor

2 жыл бұрын

@@velvety2006 Haha... Yep! kzread.info/dash/bejne/oaOcpMigm8fRg7g.html

Hooray for taking a sin off for Stan Winston!

when they burned claudia and her "new mother", man...that hurt my soul :

@stefanfilipovits21

2 жыл бұрын

Oh god and the ashes rising up as Louis cries and silently stares death at Santiago. It’s so good.

@taylorlipinski4048

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly and the lady just turned into a vampire. She didn't have any involvement with what Louis and Claudia did to Lestat. She was basically a newborn vampire and they decided to kill her anyway.

@Brandelwyn

2 жыл бұрын

It gets worse when you read the book about Andrei

3:58 Don't blink. Don't even blink. Blink and you're dead. They are fast, faster than you could believe. Don't turn your back, don't look away, and Don't Blink! Good luck.

@AlexSeverinski

2 жыл бұрын

I'm expecting to see that in the outtakes. *EDIT* They did not.

@murrcat1021

2 жыл бұрын

Haha yasss!

I'd love to see your take on Queen of the Damned. The fact Warner Bros. made it just to keep Anne Rice from getting the rights to her work back is a sin in itself.

@skj9163

Жыл бұрын

That was a horrible movie. There was very little story to it and was as flat as a pancake

@jbvader721

Жыл бұрын

​@@skj9163Not me hiding the soundtrack CD in my couch.

@janas192

9 ай бұрын

@@jbvader721oh, the soundtrack was SO good!

I asked some beginner questions on a special FX message board in the early 2000s. Who answered my questions? STAN WINSTON. Honestly a whole bunch of those OG FX people are just super nice.

100% correct. Stan Winston was the man for effects. Just like Danny Elfman was for composures. These guys are pure movie magic. They should be as celebrated and loved as any director.

@Saranda4787

2 жыл бұрын

Do you know what composure means? Maybe the word you're looking for is compositions.

I’m not a huge fan of Kirsten Dunst but she killed it in this movie.

@abramrexjoaquin7513

2 жыл бұрын

For those wondering why Coffins are a necessity... Imagine a commonsense folk stumbling on a coffin in the middle of the day. Do you think that person will disturb that coffin and open it up to see who's inside? No. It's grotesque to hide the true grotesque.

@tyrone5969

2 жыл бұрын

@@abramrexjoaquin7513 that's actually an incredibly interesting perspective, thank you.

@tyrone5969

2 жыл бұрын

Agreed and agreed. Maybe her best performance was at 11?

@Katatawnic

2 жыл бұрын

@@tyrone5969 In my opinion, this was by far her best role. I was never very impressed with her since.

@KittyGoldPaint

2 жыл бұрын

@@Katatawnic I use to feel that way until I saw Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. I know everyone focuses on the relationship between Jim Carey & Kate Winslet, but I actually found Kirsten Dunst's story arc of Mary to be heart breaking and show a lot more range than we were use to seeing post her adolescent years.

In the book, it's more clear why Lestat chooses Louis. He was taking care of his aging, blind mortal father who he brought over from France. Louis was wealthy, and so he used this depressed young man initially for just his wealth and prestige.

As a college student in the 90’s, I have to say my friends and I were a bit obsessed with this movie. I watched it countless times. I even bought the soundtrack (on cassette of course). I think your sin tally is amusing, and have to agree with you on some, but it really was and is an awesome movie. I politely place an appeal on your final sentence. After all compare Twilight series with Interview and then tell me who commits the most sins?? 😉❤️

The movie where the Vampires looked like Rock Stars and Kirsten Dunst played a character literally beyond her years...and did it well.

@Knight-of-Sarcasm

2 жыл бұрын

Well, vampires WERE supposed to be abso gorgeous.

@stefanfilipovits21

2 жыл бұрын

Dunst is so good as Claudia. It’s incredible.

The most unrealistic and most sinnfull thing in this entire movie: Finding a french person that speaks english xD

@fadeblac5633

2 жыл бұрын

🤣🤣

@Knight-of-Sarcasm

2 жыл бұрын

Antonio has the personality, but QotD at least had the physical features perfectly for Armand. A young cherub. The Spanish accent though did sound odd considering where Armand was turned at.

@tiaferrandino4881

2 жыл бұрын

@@Knight-of-Sarcasm I agree. I always thought Antonio should've been Santiago. I mean I love Antonio I DO but he was def miscast. It should've been the boy Louis fed on.

@treystephens6166

2 жыл бұрын

@@Knight-of-Sarcasm Armand loved little boys.

One of the few movies about vampires that casted their lead roles perfectly; I can’t imagine Lestat, Louis or Claudia being played by any other than Tom Cruise, Brad Pitt and Kristen Dunst. Also, no sparkly vampire ha!

RIP to the one responsible for this movie... Anne Rice, the vampire queen 🧛🏻‍♀️

The sin about only having 10 people in Hollywood making movies is accurate...Kevin Bacon is clearly the ringleader and/or center of this theory.

@lanapowell

2 жыл бұрын

There's a similar older joke about the BBC "Welcome to the BBC. We have 5 actors, 4 scripts, 3 sets, and 2 producers. Enjoy your stay." Or something to that effect, at least.

@AthenaBast

2 жыл бұрын

@@lanapowell the BBC has 2 sets, Cardiff and the forests of France.

@marniesutton9553

2 жыл бұрын

That's why everybody is only 6 degrees away from him. :)

1000% agree on the Stan Winston sin reversal.

@mitodrumisra8972

2 жыл бұрын

@Fake Account Patreon members get early access...

@dillonb8019

2 жыл бұрын

PGC sweat

@irishbob26

2 жыл бұрын

In the words a slightly different yet v similar youtube channel Stan Wiston is always a win.

@cyd172

2 жыл бұрын

@Fake Account I'm up painfully early in the AM

Fun fact: in the books, Armand was quite young. Like, 15 or 16 when he was made a vampire. Which is a huge “crime” in vampiric world. Armand played by an adult male seemed funny to me in this movie. But…. Antonio Banderas. Lol It’s funny that CinemaSins repeatedly says vampires are immortal- but that doesn’t mean they are invincible. Lestat COULD die. But vampires can “level” up in strength and abilities. That way it makes them harder to kill, the more powerful they are. Lestat was quite old, and was indeed, VERY powerful. He could withstand direct sunlight at one point. (But still burn, just not die like a lesser vampire would). In Memnoch, The Devil- Satan himself wanted to recruit Lestat to battle God, BECAUSE Lestat became so powerful. In Queen of the Damned, which describes the origin of Vampires, the Queen was so old and powerful they were like marble Statues. They could soar their minds all over the world. And reframe from the need to drink blood. Lestat’s rockstar lifestyle woke her up from her marble sleep. Also fun fact: in the book, Claudia was roughly 5-6 years old when she was converted to a vampire by Louie. A child. And Lestat finished the process mainly as a way to make Louis happy, and force him to remain with Lestat. Gay drama without the gay, I suppose. Huge manipulation though by Lestat. They built a family unit, essentially. That’s why the Parisian vampires killed Claudia- because under their “laws” children should never be converted to vampirism. That, and she attempted to kill her Maker, Lestat, which also was a big no-no. This is just CinemaSins, and they get a lot wrong with their reviews because they haven’t read the original content of books/ movie lore- but I recommend anyone to actually READ the Vampire chronicles by Anne Rice. It explains everything CinemaSins gets wrong in their videos. One of the greatest novel series ever written. Anne Rice is a true talented and classic writer. Much love to her for all her books.

this movie was definitely a major player in both my bisexual awakening and admiration for vampires

I know, I know. "the books don't matter" but I've read the book many times and the movie is a pretty faithful adaptation. Much more so than Queen of the Damned. And Im not a Tom Cruise fan, but I know he read the book as well.And assuming he worked as hard to prepare for this role as he did in the Mission impossible films, than I'd have to say that Tom Cruise absolutely NAILED IT!

@Knight-of-Sarcasm

2 жыл бұрын

QotD had so much going against it. The Studio suits wanted lightning to strike twice but the things that they demanded be in the movie against the Director's choices were part of what made it "ugh" to so many fans. Like the rock music. The Director wanted a mini-series but had to take what he could get so he used it to tell a story influenced by the books rather than adaptation of the books. Some of the QotD deleted scenes were interesting. I understand why they moved Marius to be the sire of Lestat--honestly, he was the mentor so why have the sire in the movie for 5 minutes before killing himself? Save the audience's confusion. I feel so bad for the Director because of all the verbal beatings the fans have given him all these years. Yes, I watched an interview with him which is where I learned these things. QotD is a guilty pleasure. Tom still > Sterling though.

@stefanfilipovits21

2 жыл бұрын

It’s breaks my heart we never got the awesome origin for all vampires on the big screen.

@BrunoTigerFx

2 жыл бұрын

The thing is with queen of the damned, we had to get a lot of the backstories before the reunion and that movie would be 3 hours long and admittingly most of it is because lestat broke the vampire code and all the vampires were fucked up with his foolery and need of having a stage to perfom. The book is more focused on maharet because at a point lestat goes, fuck it, i will be king of the damn world ...

@marniesutton9553

2 жыл бұрын

Tom Cruise TRIED to nail it, but failed miserably. He just wasn't Lestat material.

"Can you name me a time in history where 24-year-olds weren't considered adults?" yes, 5 minutes ago. :P

@trinaq

2 жыл бұрын

Haha, well played!

@kedakat

2 жыл бұрын

Ancient Roman time Boom 😆 lol

@danielduncan6806

2 жыл бұрын

I do not consider humans that have not fully matured to be adults. Therefore, I cannot call any human an adult at age 24. Maybe 25, maybe 26, perhaps even later for some. But not 24.

@tyrone5969

2 жыл бұрын

@@danielduncan6806 are you trolling in search of people saying "OK Boomer" in response? Because I'm pretty sure that you are.

@inspiredby624

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah I definitely consider anyone under 25 a "young adult" and not a true adult yet.

I loved the first 3 novels very much. Especially the second novel where Lestat feels wronged after reading Interview With a Vampire so he decides to give his side of the story and spreading it throughout bookstores everywhere, breaking vamp rules but still not giving af. Truly the brat prince as other vamps scornfully describe him as. Haha, he eventually even creates his own famous rock band! Lets not forget why he's labeled "prince" though I'll let future readers discover the story behind that themselves. But yes, Lestat's character was so well written and entertaining that it's a shame they didn't follow the first movie with a second novel adaptation. My warning to anyone interested in trying out the novels is to enjoy the great acting of the first movie but please please please ignore all that is the film "Queen Of The Damned" as that was a terrible adaptation of the novel. During and after "Memnoch The Devil" I started to lose a bit of interest in the vampire chronicles with the exception of a few cool parts of some later novels. What do you guys think?

@briansullivan5908

Жыл бұрын

I agree the first 3 books were good, I was lost after the 4th, it was a bit too hokey. The witch books were a bit convoluted. I didn't mind the Queen of the Damned movie, if you didn't think about the book it was entertaining enough. The book was so much more interesting.

Vampires can’t “break into” someone’s home. They need to be invited in. So I hear at least 🤷🏻‍♂️

@scienceface8884

2 жыл бұрын

Vampire propaganda. Like crossing running water, just another mundane activity that vampires can do to "prove that they aren't vampires".

@safwanshuhaib9968

2 жыл бұрын

😂 you must have seen the lost boys

@FramesPerSecond

2 жыл бұрын

@@safwanshuhaib9968 or Buffy

@Briansgate

2 жыл бұрын

@@FramesPerSecond In Buffy, having to be invited in was definitely a thing.

@abegarfield543

2 жыл бұрын

They they can do anything, like any fictional characters. There's no rules to fiction.

I can't get over the fact that Brad Pitt looks and sounds like he could be related to Hayden Christensen in this movie

@trinaq

2 жыл бұрын

Me too, Hayden had a look similar to Brad's, at least where the Star Wars prequels are concerned.

@christopherjakel1049

2 жыл бұрын

Blasphemy!!!!!

@amentlik

2 жыл бұрын

he certainly acts like him...

@johnsensebe3153

2 жыл бұрын

But I bet he's OK with sand.

@ascensionindustries9631

2 жыл бұрын

Well that's not any story a Jedi will you. 😁

History buff that I am, September 1870 when Louis and Claudia are in Paris, France should be at war with Prussia and Paris should be under siege shortly after that. And having two vampires give an account of the Siege of Paris and the Paris Commune while maintaining vampiric lifestyle would have been far more interesting than what we did get

@Knight-of-Sarcasm

2 жыл бұрын

Isn't that where the prostitutes gave up their red clothing for the hot air balloon?

@Person1865

2 жыл бұрын

I'm always let down by the trope that vampires live throughout the centuries just drinking blood and having sex when actual interesting things were happening!

@jesushchrist285

11 ай бұрын

@@Person1865 also battlefields are a fantastic place to get blood from young healthy people who are about to die anyway

@Person1865

11 ай бұрын

@@jesushchrist285 some of the vampires in The Vampire Diaries are Civil War veterans but I think that's when they were turned

I think the real sin here is they haven’t made a sequel to this masterpiece

@kamikazeyazzie

2 жыл бұрын

they did, it's called "queen of the damned".

@reneedailey1696

2 жыл бұрын

A GOOD sequel is likely what they meant.

@Briansgate

2 жыл бұрын

@@reneedailey1696 I agree. It's like Highlander being an only movie.

@treystephens6166

2 жыл бұрын

@@Briansgate it’s sad they didn’t do the other two books right afterwards

@LestatsFiancee4

Жыл бұрын

Talking about sequels, have you all watched the series yet?

This is one of my favorite movies. I was obsessed with it! I still am, it's a bit cheesy at times but the acting and storytelling are so well done. Plus I had a huge crush on Cruise and Pitt lol.

I've never been much of a Tom Cruise fan, but I enjoy the heck out of his Lestat performance. And Antonio's wig in this film is criminally bad. His own hair at the time was gorgeous.

@Knight-of-Sarcasm

2 жыл бұрын

Antonio's actoring was on point. The appearance? Not so much. Armand's book appearance didn't match him at all.

@Rob_Thorsman

2 жыл бұрын

They should have given Pitt the wig. Louis' hair is supposed to be black.

@justtime6736

2 жыл бұрын

Lol per pfp, you'll be memed having paid the tax on coal.

@gemmaraine

2 жыл бұрын

Same I'm not a fan of his other movies, but he plays a really good part in this

@xotleti

Жыл бұрын

I can't understand what they did to Armand in this movie. He was supposed to look like a 17 yo ukrainian boy 🤷🤷

9:39 I love that Roger Lloyd-Pack (Trigger from “Only Fools and Horses”) plays the piano teacher.

@highlandoutsider8148

2 жыл бұрын

Dude, 🤯 I've watched this movie countless times, but dude, 🤯🤣

@blueberrypirate3601

2 жыл бұрын

Without a broom

As much as so many people seem to hate this movie, I’ve been recommending it to anyone who will listen since it was released. I’ve probably watched it 500 times, it was my introduction to the entirety of Anne Rice’s Vampire Chronicles (which I also highly recommend, even more so than the movie), and even prompted me to attend a book signing where I was able to meet the literary legend, herself! I really wish that ‘Interview...’ got the respect I feel it deserves...maybe someday it will.

@Paulafan5

2 жыл бұрын

People hate this movie?! I thought a lot of people really liked it. Or is it younger people don't like it?

@siennamargeaux8413

4 ай бұрын

Where did you get this idea that many people hated this movie? No, this movie was much anticipated and people loved it when it came out. It was a very popular movie and remains a favorite by those who've seen it.

this movie is one of my guilty pleasures. idk if it’s the vampires, or pitt and cruise, or the sexual undertones, maybe all three

I was 12 when this came out on the big screen. But you can rest assured that I was sure as hell watching it when it was out on HBO the following year while my mom wasn't in the house.

@kcinkcin3808

2 жыл бұрын

And home alone

@KittyGoldPaint

2 жыл бұрын

We must be around the same age, because I remember being about 12 or 11 when it came out, only my mom took my sister & I to see it in the theater, and let's just say my bisexuality was forever solidified from watching it on the big screen 🖤

@Wolfbane382

2 жыл бұрын

@@KittyGoldPaint I wanted to go with my aunt to see it. But at the time when I asked, I was at my grandmother's house and both she and my mom gave a hard no. Even though my aunt did try to convince them, they still gave a hard no. While I'm not really bi myself, this movie was my umm awakening sort of speak.

@KittyGoldPaint

2 жыл бұрын

@@Wolfbane382 I'd definitely call it an awakening for me as well: First seeing Lestat biting Louis, than Lestat & Louis both biting that unfortunate prostitute, and than Louis & Armand looking like they were going to kiss, and being so disappointed that they didn't...good times 😏

@bartwinter4078

2 жыл бұрын

@@KittyGoldPaint I suppose killing people and drinking their blood is really sexy

4:30 even without telling us why ngl I just default assumed it was like a security thing. If you burn to death when in sunlight of course you’d sleep in something that the sun can’t shine through, like why only trust curtains when you can have multiple levels of security

Tom is always at his best when he's playing wired characters

I was in the army at the time, getting ready for the field I somehow got the book, and read it in nearly one sitting, book is freaking amazing, looked at the guy In my unit and said this would be an outstanding movie, he said it was so soon as we got back I went into Lawton and found the movie, was severely disappointed, if you have never read the book it is truly a must read lestat is even better. Truly a great series of books

God, I miss Stan Winston. He put real things on the screen. Real things that you could touch and you knew were there.

Tom cruise scared the s*it out of me as a kid with that performance. Looking back, he's about every bit as silly as he was imposing, but that scene where he comes back from the swamp all f*cked up, still gives a chill

Louis' face when he finds Claudia's burnt body omfg it was amazing 🙀

"Even though you're the father of lies, I want things to be as they were." "KZread commenters, telling me they only liked our channel when our videos were under 6 minutes." I loved this to the point I had to stop the video to recenter myself.

Stoker never said that sunlight kills vampires, only that it makes them weaker.

@princeofcupspoc9073

2 жыл бұрын

A lot of "vampire lore" comes from the film Nosferatu, or the Christopher Lee version from Hammer. Hell, in Captain Kronos, a vampire can resurrect a frog. You "vampire fans" have seen these films, right?

@stefanfilipovits21

2 жыл бұрын

Very true.

@gessabelle

2 жыл бұрын

Not only that but we do see Dracula out during the day. It is just before the circus incident I think

@adrian72300

2 жыл бұрын

@@princeofcupspoc9073 Yes, have you seen the BBC TV Count Dracula with Frank Finlay as Van Helsing? from 1977 really good, Amazon Prime is running it now, Captain Kronos has a really good take on the lore, and the cinematography is nice as well

Setting things on fire was Louis' vampire superpower, obviously.

Funny thing about Lestat even really giving a damn about whether or not people see him when he attacks Louis: he kinda… doesn’t. Lestat is a BRAT. He wants what he wants, when he wants it, HOW he wants it, and he haaaates that he has to hide because he is a vampire. Hell, in Queen of the Damned (BOOK over movie!), he blantantly brags over tv and in his concert that, YES, he is an actual vampire, and there are other vampires in the world. Aaaaaand he challenges them to step up if they don’t like that he’s breaking their rules. Though he doooooes get a thorough mind and booty WHOOPING in later books.

@BHStudios01

2 жыл бұрын

And about vampires other human biological functions… eh… um… Anne Rice actually DOES write about this… they… um… can get… eggplants. BUT they don’t have smexytime like humans. No interest in it like that. BUT the killing and bloodlust does it for them. Double but that doesn’t stop them from… playing. Cuuuuz Lestat does… things to Jesse… can’t remember which book.

@tompearce5418

5 күн бұрын

​@@BHStudios01 none of them. In the books Lestat was back with Louis the whole time he knew Jesse, and only ever had one conversation with her, while researching his book. The whole rockstar thing was really an attempt to reach out to Louis and apologise for keeping the secret of Those Who Must Be Kept from him.

God this is my favorite movie. My sister had this life size rag doll that she absolutely adored. I would dance with it like Lestat danced with Kristin Durst character's dead mom. She would freak out at me and eventually convinced my mom to keep the ragdoll out of her room. (I told her it was really a dead body stuffed with cotton. I was a rotten big sister)😆

No, no, Tom Cruise was perfectly cast for this role! And yes…. i read the book, read it before the movie was even made.

@lisadoran1697

2 жыл бұрын

I agree. He somehow ended up being perfect. He embodied the spirit of my dear Brat Prince.

@themurrrr

2 жыл бұрын

@@lisadoran1697 He really did. And I am saying this while not really being a Tom Cruise fan. But he was perfect for this. I am also pleased they gave him the blond wig. Too often they don’t bother making the hair look the way it is described.

@marniesutton9553

2 жыл бұрын

Tom Cruise was virtually the last person that they should have cast in this role. He was terrible, ESPECIALLY if you read the books.

@krabbykat9918

2 жыл бұрын

@@marniesutton9553 oh go off you're commenting that under every comment lmao did he ditch you or sum

Who else actually loves this movie?

@fadeblac5633

2 жыл бұрын

Yes!!! I Love Vampire movies. This ranks in my top 3.

@stefanfilipovits21

2 жыл бұрын

🤚right here

@nappssnapps2891

2 жыл бұрын

Guilty! 🙌🏽

@princeofcupspoc9073

2 жыл бұрын

@@fadeblac5633 Hahahaha. It's not a vampire movie. It's a bodice ripper with angsty characters. I live through that shit. I saw it people who seriously got off in the whole "dress like goths to see the film." At the end of the day, the film was shit. Sorry. Just the facts.

@fadeblac5633

2 жыл бұрын

@@princeofcupspoc9073 facts in your own mind. The End.

I love how you talk & never fail to make me laugh, but that "Blatant overcandling" Business did me in! 🤣

"And even though this movie ain't even good" you guys are fuckin high, this film is a masterpiece

"Despite being 400 years old, Armand truly has the same grasp of the definition of 'irony' as a college freshman." Or Alanis Morissette Also, painting a naked Chris, WTF

@BrunoTigerFx

2 жыл бұрын

Btw, spoiler alert, brad pitt and cristian slater have indeed a relationship after he is turned into a vampire ...

@SinHurr

2 жыл бұрын

Objection! Morissette's incorrect use of irony is intentional and thus ironic satire

@Person1865

2 жыл бұрын

@@SinHurr Further objection: nobody uses irony correctly anyway so let's just stop caring.

The Movie: shows light Cinema: thats a sin for you.

The opening establishing shot effectively sets the setting in modern times which juxtaposes Louis's early life so long in the past. Seeing the modern city streets and then seeing him riding through the rugged terrain on horseback helps you feel his age.

"Go to the store to buy milk? Gaggle of prostitutes!" So that's why Dad left to get milk and never came back

One of my favorite KZreadrs doing one of my favorite movies! I'm having a really good day.

"THAT'S THE MOVE BABY, PLAY THE HITS!"😆😆😆

In the books, Malloy actually goes through a lot of suffering after the movie before hes even able to be made into a vampire. He's debatably extremely unlucky

I love that Louie burns his own house down and disappears and somehow thinks that local authorities will just believe the slaves when they say their master turned into a vampire and freed them before apparently committing suicide.

“Blatant overcandling” 😂😂. Love this channel!

I watched this movie out of context when I was 17 back in Portugal at 2am, I thought to myself 'Tom Cruise, Brad Pitt, that's pretty nice", then "Vampires? What?" I couldn't stop watching, I did not understand a thing, it was so uncanny and weird, thanks CinemaSins for doing this service for us.

For you who doesn’t know, Anne Rice continued to write on the chronicle a few years ago. And have given out three books in the Prince Lestat series.