The muffled voice of the narrator is annoying.

That's definitely NOT Mel Gibson lying on the table as young William Wallace's father.

@ashleyoliva7588

3 жыл бұрын

RIGHT! Its very obviously the dad lying there.

Excellent catches. All them. Really enjoyed this video

This guy sounds like he is talking in a toilet

Huh? I can't understand half of what you are saying.

This film has more 4th wall bloopers than Monty Python's Holy Grail!

you have such a great eye for detail! how did you spot all these? ive watched this movie a thousand times and never noticed most of this! holy crap!

I get the feeling many of these filming mistakes (and others not here) were spotted by the editor - he is an A-list movie editor - but were allowed to stay because it would simply be too expensive too reshoot, and one would have to go frame-by-frame in very slow time to actually see them. Except for the white car, I caught a glimpse of that when I watched it in '95.

You forgot 2 big historical inaccuracies: 1. Princess Isabel was around 4 y old during Wallace's uprising. 2. During the Battle of Stirling Bridge, there is no bridge at all.

@joshuagreenslade3445

5 жыл бұрын

That's Right

@ethan7009

3 жыл бұрын

The reason there is no bridge in that scene,is because those who live in Stirling used the bridge to commute, so signed a petition for it not to be used in the movie ( and they won) so the famous Stirling Bridge was not used in the movie for that scene

@spankyspork5808

3 жыл бұрын

Historical inaccuracies shouldn't count as mistakes, they were done on purpose with creative license

Lost Interest due to Narrator's voice

No movies perfect. Great movie . Really enjoyed it . But mistakes happen . Move on ...

would have been good to watch ... but i couldn't understand him ,pity

Although lot of historical mistakes and editing mistakes,,, it is still my favourite movie of all times

Difficult to hear the narration, at least it’s not showing all the poor quality bloopers seen on other channels. 8/10

Let me start off by saying Braveheart was a very entertaining movie, especially when it came out. At the time, nothing like the cavalry charge had ever been seen on the screen, despite its imperfections. While many of the errors noticed here are trivial movie mistakes, I feel the more important ones relate to ignoring actual history to promote a narrative. The biggest example is the depiction of an Englishman taking a Scottish bride, even though this never happened in history, but also including no bridge at the "Battle of Stirling Bridge", crediting Wallace with inventing the long pike after looking at trees and 3 seconds' reflection, even though pikes date back to Alexander's time, etc. etc. The writer of Braveheart, when confronted with all the inaccuracies, once said, " I think we shouldn't let FACT [meaningful pause]...get in the way of TRUTH [knowing look]". I cannot imagine a more self-contradictory statement. If your "truth" is hindered by the facts, then guess what! It isn't truth! People watched this movie, got all pissed off, started a movement to separate Scotland from the UK, which fortunately failed last year. To quote an insightful song: "where there is one, they're bound to divide it right in two". Needless division and strife over an inaccurate representation. I realize that many Scots still hate the English, but maybe it's time for some examination and reflection on these feelings, and whether they benefit anything or anybody. The same people that cry out against war are so often exactly the ones who can't keep the peace!! The importance of "truth", and what it really means and represents, should be taken way more seriously in Hollywood. Anyways, great breakdown, glad you took the time to do this.

@reelfail

9 жыл бұрын

JTKinetic Flo Thanks for your comment. You make very valid points. When I first started looking into mistakes in Braveheart, I found a lot of extensive websites commenting on how history got "butchered" in the movie. I understand that movies are for entertainment and are given some liberties because of the story line, but at the same time movies can spread misinformation and that is taken lightly in Hollywood. I'm sure that many people watched this movie and thought that a lot of the things portrayed were generally accurate. I know I did, partially because of laziness in researching the actual history of the Scots/English conflict. I've come to realize that the "Based on true events" is really a joke with some movies really stretching that meaning to the extreme. Thanks for watching and taking the time to leave a comment. Much appreciated.

@HyperInflation2020

8 жыл бұрын

kinda like the movie Titanic being portrayed as a love story.

@florencenightingale5164

4 жыл бұрын

'This movie started a movement to separate Scotland from the UK'?? Awa' an bile yer heid! The SNP (Scottish National Party) was founded in 1934!

@spankyspork5808

3 жыл бұрын

This is such a silly comment. There has been tension between Scotland and England for a lot longer than Braveheart has been out. Secondly, if you're too stupid to know the difference between films and real life, perhaps you shouldn't be watching them. At no point in Braveheart does it say "based on a true story." Art is not obligated to dumb itself down for the audience.

8:55 wow... excelente trabajo, gracias por mostrar la famosa camioneta de Braveheart ;)

@reelfail

9 жыл бұрын

muchas gracias! has visto el otro coche en el fondo en el funeral de Murron? [thanks! did you see the other car on the background at Murron's funeral?]

@mipropiosoft

9 жыл бұрын

reelfail yeah, I found this: "At the funeral of William Wallace's wife, Murron, a white van can be seen. He bends down to kiss her and as he stands back up, if you look over his left shoulder through the trees you can see the van going past. It's very quick, small, and blurred, but it's there."

@michaelhawkins7389

3 жыл бұрын

@@reelfail where are you from your accent sounds weird ? No offense

I’ve actually noticed quite a few of these, but for some I wouldn’t count them as mistakes. Why are some of the blood effects considered mistakes when some of those were probably the best effects of the time? The movie came out in 1995, so mistakes like #53’s a 1995 bloodstain is kind of to be expected... Btw, you could have mentioned that Mel Gibson himself confirmed he felt he was too old for the role, which is why “the years were not kind” to him in #11.

@jamesmason8436

4 жыл бұрын

The years really weren't kind to Mel. He was only 38 when this film was made, but looks about 10 years older.

08:57 That looks like it's taken from a Monty Python movie! :)

Hater!! Create a movie instead of criticizing

I DON'T CARE!!! Still a masterpiece! ❤️

@john-me1jd

4 жыл бұрын

I totally agree.He should suspend his disbelief and enjoy it for what it is - a brilliant, entertaining movie based on a true story. It is not a documentary!

@edghar7995

3 жыл бұрын

Yes. Masterpiece. Cross in my mind after gladiator mistake scene. Aeroplane?

The guy on the table playing wallaces dad is NOT mel gibson

Can you do one for HIGHLANDER too?

The guy on the table is clearly the original actor

Your last comment is wrong: in the battle Campbell has his LEFT hand chopped off; in the celebration ceremony he is thrusting his RIGHT fist into the air. So no mistake there...

0:34 is supposed to be foreshadowing only mel doesn't slap you in the face with it like some directors

Only a film mate .lots mistakes if you look for them but watching the film without looking for them they not there .

Not only countless mistakes, almost whole film are wrong history about William Wallace life.

they took a lot of historical liberties in this mocie, and, btw you missed a big one - at the battle of Sterling bridge, there is no bridge!

Mistake in the subtitles: 'whiskey' is Irish and has never been made in Scotland. The correct Scottish version is 'whisky'.

Most of these aren't mistakes. You can still throw things with your opposite hand. He voices been warning up it just challenging himself. The movie didn't claim to be 100% historically accurate, either.

The movie sound is too loud and your voice can be hardly heard.

You didn't see the extra not fighting

its full of mistakes. especially carrying the weapons. well spotted

Braveheart....the Edsel of the movie world.

Most of those were really trivial

This guy has the ultimate case of OCD

I don’t think that the scenes with young Wallace throwing rocks with different hands can be seen as a fail, some people are ambidextrous. I also believe that if watching closely enough, you can find fault/fail with everything, and that it shows you’ve got too much time to waste...

'"Infantry" as word was unknown in 13th C.' So was the rest of English. We wouldn't understand them at all if they were speaking the version of English actually spoken in the 13th C.

Enjoyable film, but so historically inaccurate that it offends this history buff.

@florencenightingale5164

4 жыл бұрын

When it came out, as a Scot living in the US, I was frequently asked how historically accurate it is. My response was, "The true history of William Wallace could be written on a postage stamp."

@john-me1jd

4 жыл бұрын

@@florencenightingale5164Lighten up Flo. It's just a movie. How many Robin Hood films have been made?

@florencenightingale5164

4 жыл бұрын

@@john-me1jd Robin Hood is a legend, Wallace was real, so there's no comparison. My objection (though I admit I enjoyed the movie) is that it purported to be historical.

As much as the historical inaccuracies annoy me, the excuse of it being a fictional film and not a documentary could be vaguely acceptable. What seriously annoys me is the amount of glaringly obvious continuity errors! I mean okay, one or two is normal in a film, but surely somebody has the job of checking for such things? If I made such a hash of my job I'd be fired! I'm sure films with massive budgets could afford to hire someone purely to spot such terrible continuity errors before release, and if they did for this film I wonder what (if anything) happened to them when all the errors were revealed after release?

@ThomasMikkelsenEverStoned77

6 жыл бұрын

haha you said hash 😆😆😆

@staticklingon2182

6 жыл бұрын

Do you run the show where you work? That's why he can make his movie how he likes.

He's switching weapons like he has video game powers :) still a great movie though

@tomjerry5475

2 жыл бұрын

Lol

movie mistake a dude gets stabbbed but in real life he no deadededed.

I can’t understand what you’re saying

I noticed immediately that the dead body on the table was Mel.

@andrewjoyce9038

4 жыл бұрын

No it isn't. U can clearly see its the original actor

Hilarious !!! Fire the movie editor !!! I wonder if they won an Academy Award for editing that year ??????????

@CIC-qm9zt

2 жыл бұрын

Nope, I believe that he didnt.

There is another "mistake" I remember in the movie. In the battle of Stirling, when it is about to end, there is an english soldier fighting without any commitment. I love this movie since 1995 but the war scenes are not believable at all. I know they couldnt hire 10 k extras for that... You need lots GCI for this kind of scenes :(

@reelfail

9 жыл бұрын

That is most possibly true, I heard of that mistake and I tried to look for those soldiers that were not fighting but I could not find them. Maybe they were in the background and were really hard to spot. I love this movie too even with all it's faults.

@pristika9007

9 жыл бұрын

reelfail Oh, don't get me wrong. This is one of my favourite movies of all time... See the movie one more time and when the Battle of Stirling is about to end ( when Wallace almost strike Lochlan). Battle was already won yet in the backgroud you can see this friendly battle :p

@nyrangersfan6325

8 жыл бұрын

They had thousands of extras. CGI wasn't really around at that time and in very low use. Ever watched behind the scenes?

@JoJo-ld3yx

6 жыл бұрын

I was actually checking the comments to see if anyone else noticed that soldier who does that weird spin move pretending to fight. I noticed that when i was a kid and it always bugged me.

@chewie3590

6 жыл бұрын

Thanks

Good video and im glad you pointed out that the so called English soldiers were actually Norman and would have been speaking French.The real English who were the Saxons were the peasants at that time in history. English history is far to complex for Mel Gibson and this film shows he was out of his depth in trying to portray us. Or on the other hand he just didnt care and decided to make a simplistic portrayal that suited his agenda

@luboshcamber1992

2 жыл бұрын

@Just Me It was just a movie.

@Tomboycarol

2 жыл бұрын

@@luboshcamber1992 But some people will believe fake historic facts and thats not right

@luboshcamber1992

2 жыл бұрын

@@Tomboycarol That is true for much of what we are taught in schools as well. Movies are an illusion. Created by untrustworthy people to entertain masses to num them and take their attention away from what really matters..

...

These bloopers are all lifted from the goofs section on IMDB.

Wait a minute. Wallace is with his uncle at the funeral. Than his uncle shows up later and asks about the funeral that he attended as if he wasnt there?? Wtf. Lol

9:48 weapon switches, so funny, never noticed it!

@mdteletom1288

4 жыл бұрын

Well it was long run.

Yeah sometof things are too silly to mention

Discount CinemaSins

@gunnar6674

3 жыл бұрын

Enjoying this more than CinemaSins, to be honest.

A few good catches and a whole lot of nit picking.

And please don't like this human become a narrator.

Ummmm he had 4 sons

This movie was a Joke! So many mistakes. I guess you can't fire them after movie is made.

Can’t understand this dude

You forgot to mention the car that can be seen driving by in the background as William is approaching the magistrate. Just the same, this my favorite movie.

inFANtry....LOL

I thought the dude was a little nitpicking for my taste. I still thought it was an awesome movie.

@ebojfmdboojoh4023

2 жыл бұрын

There's so many historical inaccuracies in this film. 1) Wallace's father was named Alan not Malcolm. 2) War paint was not used by anyone in this period. 3) Wallace and Queen Isabella never even met in reality. Wallace died in 1305 and Isabella wasn't born until 1295. 4) Edward 1st died in 1307, two years after Wallace died. 5) Althouth Piers Gaveston was exiled from England by Edward 1st, he was not thrown out of a window. He actually outlived Edward 1st by five years. William Wallace was probably an insignificant figure in Scotish independance. There was an independance movement already happening in Scotland before the emergence of William Wallace.

Special effects or stunt tools that are visible only in superslomo or stop action are not mistakes.

Wow I can't believe this mess won Best Picture.

Honestly, who cares? It’s a movie. Sometimes there are mistakes. So what.

A lot of ticky tack calls here. Better to look at the Blooper Reel, there was a lot of non seriousness going on. Dancing at Murron's grave for example, Mel probably saying Now the ex wife don't get 50%

You sound like you're speaking an alien language. Get a better microphone or something dawg.

Videos con esta calidad de audio tan espantosa deberían estar prohibidos...

HOLY SHIT........ How the fuck did I not notice ANY of these? I need to start watching movies sober.

Basically you have to much time on ur hands to see all of this and dont spend enough time between a woman's legs u should try it then tell me if u see all this pish lol

Like the Patriot this movie was pure propaganda!

@dimipartcaster7770

3 жыл бұрын

There is not propaganda.England invaded in many places in the world to build the famous British Empire(which is famous until now so, in fact, this is the real propaganda).You can blaim the movie for mistakes but you can't deny the truth. Sorry mate

@jeremykegley1669

3 жыл бұрын

@@dimipartcaster7770 America and Scotland also invaded other Country's to help build there Empire's! As well as Rome and so on...!

@dimipartcaster7770

3 жыл бұрын

Of course my friend.I mentioned only England cause you said about propaganda.Where is the propaganda? England was the winner and made a lot of crimes.This is not lie. Wallace, because of his rebellion, executed with a very vicious way.He was a man who died for his country's freedom and this is the only thing that we should remember and not if on this scene we can see a capricorn behind the soldiers.Of course, Wallace did crimes too but when you invade in a country what do you expect? To treat you like a friend?The truth is propaganda?Turks did worst in my country. How to deny that? By saying "we didn't rape,stole and kill the Greeks?". And something else. I really don't have any problem with England. I lived there once and I made friends.As you said, all empires in history, destroyed everything so the problem is not the people but their leaders.I don't know about the others, but I will not hate a whole nation because of a movie.I only say that we cannot refuse the war and the evil within it.

I think it is important for people to realize that minor continuity errors and mistakes such as the ones in this video are inevitable. Making a film is VERY DIFFICULT, and a film set is a fast paced environment! It is easy to criticize things such as historical inaccuracies and continuity errors when the only contribution you made to the film was paying 10 bucks to sit on your ass for 2 hours. Mel Gibson and the hundreds of other cast and crew invested several months of long labor intensive days to give you the experience that they did. It makes me VERY ANGRY when people make videos like this. It looks like they are trying to ruin movies - movies that people worked very hard on; movies that I really like and many other people really like - simply because they think it will give them short term popularity and KZread views. In my opinion, there is nothing more arrogant and selfish than trying to tarnish the hard work of others for selfish gain. If you are a person who hates movies with continuity errors and movies with historical inaccuracies fine! Just understand that there are people with different opinions and people who really enjoy these movies despite all of that. Keep this in mind the next time you want to make a video like this. Keep in mind all of the people who worked hard on the movie and all of the people whose cinematic experiences you are ruining.

@Tomboycarol

4 жыл бұрын

He has every right to criticize this film because its shit. Mel Gibson worked hard telling lies about English people for his own agenda he went out of his way to be as offensive as he could.So who is the selfish and arrogant one?

@dimipartcaster7770

2 жыл бұрын

Are you really so stupid English boy?

The English monarchy would of spoke french. But not the Real English people. We would of still Been saxon

FAKE VIDEO!! disliked 👎

@ThomasMikkelsenEverStoned77

6 жыл бұрын

what's fake? this or Braveheart?

@moonmonkey858

6 жыл бұрын

Thomas Mikkelsen this video! Braveheart is a good movie! And William Wallace is my ancestor!

@LazarouDave

10 ай бұрын

​@@moonmonkey858You're definitely American then, grow up

All hail america biggest homosexual and bullers.