Comment your thoughts below!

I appreciate the effort, but it really does feel like you're saying the exact same thing for most of them. The best way to understand the translations is to understand their relationships to each other. If you would have covered these versions in chronological order, you could have indicated these relationships more clearly. For instance, it's helpful to know that the RSV is essentially a revision of the KJV (albeit more directly an update of the 1881-1901 revision efforts), while the NRSV and ESV are two alternative revisions of the RSV with two very different attitudes about gender-inclusive language.

@loganrankl2004

Ай бұрын

I was starting to think he might’ve been using chat GTP to write this

The Passion Translation shouldn’t be counted as a translation at all. It was all done by one person who had no experience in translation of biblical texts. The best you could call it is a Biblical commentary and many would call it much worse (heretical).

@mr.harper895

Ай бұрын

Very true!

This sounds like ai.

@disreceded

Ай бұрын

It is.

@icxcarnie

Ай бұрын

It is, the voice and the text behind it. Garbage channel.

Wow, it's like Redeemed Zoomer except not good and with an AI voice. Thumbs down my dude

It's just so great we have all these translations that preserve accuracy and reliability and balance literal accuracy and modern readability!

Why didn’t you include Douay-Rheims

@paintrevealer1

Ай бұрын

Because I’ve never heard of it -- might do a part 2 😉

Amazing

@paintrevealer1

Ай бұрын

Thank you

do people even read the scripts they generate through chatgpt before feeding them into an ai voice generator

would've been good to compare as those between niv and kjv sound exactly the same

1:14 the ASV is not the same as the NASB. The ASV was in 1901.

So basically everything other than the KJV is just there to be "faithful to the original manuscripts but also being readable". Aren't there any differences between each book? There's a reason some people prefer NIV or ESV compared to other books, why didn't you delve into that?

Who wrote this script 😭 Oh my God you're just saying the same words over and over again

Finally someone explained it. 👏

@paintrevealer1

Ай бұрын

Thanks

Terrible. NLT for accuracy?????? Come on. Don’t ever use it. No reason to.

I wonder why many of these have missing verses and others deny the deity of Jesus Christ.

@thelearningmethod

Ай бұрын

All the verses are there-typically they're in footnotes, which I think is a bit pathetic. At least bracket them into the text, like they typically do Mark 16:9-20 and John 7:53-8:11. And I think it's only the Jehovah's Witness Bible that denies Christ's Diety, all the rest (as far as I know) assert Christ as Lord and God.

@evercar5769

Ай бұрын

Some of these translations are based on different manuscripts, but the content in the “missing” verses is, for the most part, still found elsewhere in the Bible, especially with the Gospels.

@darreljones8645

Ай бұрын

@@thelearningmethod By "the Jehovah's Witness Bible" I think you mean the "New World Translation". Most infamously, it renders the first verse of John's Gospel as, "In the beginning was a God".

@DaveHonkles

Ай бұрын

@@evercar5769 There is no good reason to remove a bible verse and you should be ashamed of yourself for defending it.

@datchet11

Ай бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/gHWlx7uqoJOTZ9I.htmlsi=651eTqM3TV7_V-3L