Enzymes' Effect on Activation Energy and Free Energy

Donate here: www.aklectures.com/donate.php
Website video link: www.aklectures.com/lecture/enz...
Facebook link: / aklectures
Website link: www.aklectures.com

Пікірлер: 68

  • @shahadalhafez6932
    @shahadalhafez69324 жыл бұрын

    You’re famous in our university in Saudi Arabia 🇸🇦 Your lectures are understandable and so easy❤️👌 thanks for making Bioc easy for us.

  • @GoodbyeRubyTu3sday
    @GoodbyeRubyTu3sday7 жыл бұрын

    My friend right now I'm a student and I'm broke af, but the moment I graduate ad I get a job I'm fucking going to hit that 200$ donation button, thank you for the immense help you are giving us, *ak lectures is the best!!* a big hug from Italy :)

  • @himariyabelayneh1937

    @himariyabelayneh1937

    3 жыл бұрын

    I hope you came through

  • @shahadyagoub5143
    @shahadyagoub51434 жыл бұрын

    Saved my day again, by the way thank you so much literally, all the students in my university watch your lectures and I got all my friends to watch your lectures too , keep up the good work ❤️

  • @shauncheese
    @shauncheese9 жыл бұрын

    Your lectures are literally on par with my biochemistry lectures haha, your lectures are a lot easier to understand. Thank you!

  • @AKLECTURES

    @AKLECTURES

    9 жыл бұрын

    Sean Chih lol thats awesome and thanks! spread the word to your classmates. what school are you in?

  • @shauncheese

    @shauncheese

    9 жыл бұрын

    of course :), University of Waterloo Ontario

  • @AKLECTURES

    @AKLECTURES

    9 жыл бұрын

    Sean Chih very cool! thanks! :)

  • @miguel2001p

    @miguel2001p

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@AKLECTURES I go to university of california san diego and i also find your videos very helpful and needed even after watching course lectures

  • @aby3773
    @aby37736 жыл бұрын

    Your tutorials are amazing, tnx god for ppl like you !!

  • @heba_seyh9
    @heba_seyh95 жыл бұрын

    waw waw waw ... thank you so much you bro deserve more than 400K subscribes ,, you deserve to talk on the red carpet

  • @hanifosmancisse3642
    @hanifosmancisse36423 жыл бұрын

    I really love this channel. it makes things so easy to learn...I like the lecture methodology...

  • @vinodbhattarai6930
    @vinodbhattarai69306 жыл бұрын

    what a lovely and clear your language. thank you very much

  • @dagmfasil1001
    @dagmfasil10018 жыл бұрын

    You're the real MVP!!

  • @mckenzieburian7314
    @mckenzieburian73142 жыл бұрын

    You just make so much sense. Thank you!

  • @JN.S.M
    @JN.S.M3 жыл бұрын

    Thank you, this was perfectly explained.

  • @BRAIN_BOOSTER_COACHING
    @BRAIN_BOOSTER_COACHING3 жыл бұрын

    if i was taught like this from begining i would be a very very intelligent student. but sorry to say that our teachers have a lot knowledge but they have not the potential to teach like this. thank you sir . love from india.

  • @Langpoklife
    @Langpoklife2 жыл бұрын

    Wow …😱😱what a great lecture thank you❤️

  • @1marthag
    @1marthag8 жыл бұрын

    you are amazing. thanks so much.

  • @mehadisyef356
    @mehadisyef3566 жыл бұрын

    best so far n till now

  • @nobruco
    @nobruco4 жыл бұрын

    Hi, thanks for this lecture about Thermodynamics of chemical reactions. I have a small concern with the upper right part of your board; It seems that you forgot the standard gibbs free energy (DelatG°). In fact "DeltaG = DeltaG° + RTLnKeq", and when reaching the equilibrium, DeltaG equals zero means that DeltaG° = -RTlnKeq (but does not mean that k1=k2). Otherwise all equilibrium constants would be equal to 1. In other words reaching the equilibrium allows one to quantify Keq, the equilibrium constant (which is also : Keq=k1/k2) and this value not necessarily equals to one. I would rather say that reaching the equilibrium means that k1*[substrate]=k2*[product] (forward velocity equals reverse velocity) The case you are mentioning, (i.e. when k1=k2) is just a particular case where reactants and products have the same level of energy and they are both at the same concentration at equilibrium (50% of reactants + 50% of products at equilibrium). Or that "k1=k2" means DeltaG = DeltaG° and DeltaG is independent of the temperature at wich the reaction takes place. But I agree with the overall message that at equilibrium the kinetic of the reaction has stopped and DeltaG equals zero.

  • @qazizaahirah4168
    @qazizaahirah41688 жыл бұрын

    Great work :)

  • @rav5180
    @rav51802 жыл бұрын

    Amazing! Thank you

  • @padamkumar6591
    @padamkumar65912 жыл бұрын

    Thankyou thankyou thankyou to universe for making u sir

  • @mollymatyola2567
    @mollymatyola25677 жыл бұрын

    what's the difference between endergonic,exergonic and endothermic , exothermic..thank u by the way,ur videos are so helpful

  • @idilfarah2798
    @idilfarah27988 жыл бұрын

    Really great video!! I finally understand this! Thaaaanks :) Best regards, Idil from Denmark

  • @huxrobz9099
    @huxrobz90992 жыл бұрын

    The best ever 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏u are such a blessing to us

  • @taehoonlee4287
    @taehoonlee42877 жыл бұрын

    great job !!!!!

  • @subhamkarmakar3320
    @subhamkarmakar33203 жыл бұрын

    Excellent 🔥

  • @user-eq3zo1sm1q
    @user-eq3zo1sm1q Жыл бұрын

    Thanks very much 🔥

  • @rajkumarraghupathy8235
    @rajkumarraghupathy82358 жыл бұрын

    really helpful.. thanku ..

  • @mariapazsarmiento3826
    @mariapazsarmiento3826 Жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much

  • @nondumisondhlovu9181
    @nondumisondhlovu91818 жыл бұрын

    Please help me understand this. I was able to follow until the 11th minute where you say that the enzyme lowers the activation energy hence allows the reaction to reach equilibrium faster (this I understand) but now what confuses me is that you said that lowering of the activation energy results in stabilising the transition state. Now, won't stabilising the transition state mean that it will take longer for the equilibrium to be reached because the components of the transition state are no longer unstable - isn't it that instability is associated with readiness to react and stability takes a longer time to reach?

  • @kwindat.i.3560

    @kwindat.i.3560

    2 жыл бұрын

    I think is late to answer this question but in principle you asked a very good question. What I understand about catalyst or rather enzymes is that they lower the barrier which is the hill and this allow more molecules to overcome it to form product at a faster rate. The term stabilization has to do with lowering of activation energy but in principle the molecules on the top of the hill are still not thermodynamically stable and eventually will react to form product with lower Gibbs free energy and now the driving force is the reduction of Gibbs free energy. Note, that catalyst only remove or reduce the barrier but don't determine which product is to be formed. That has to be determined by thermodynamics. So enzymes or catalysts only affect kinetics but not thermodynamics. So to answer your question, it will not stay at the hill for longer time due to its instability, it will further decompose to be at the lowest energy state i.e. thermodynamic stable state

  • @NutriHubbyDtMaram
    @NutriHubbyDtMaram4 жыл бұрын

    U are best bro My new.sir keep it up

  • @palakvarma7720
    @palakvarma77203 жыл бұрын

    Is activation energy the difference between the energy of transition state and energy of reactants ?

  • @trishasales714
    @trishasales7147 жыл бұрын

    Hello, I know this isn't directly related to the video but you have talked about this before in another video so I'd like to ask- does chymotrypsin also cleave at the c terminus of methionine? Or does it only cleave after large aromatic residues? Also, I read somewhere that similar to typsin, chymotrypsin only cleaves at the c terminus of large hydrophobic residues ** UNLESS THE next amino acid is proline- is this true?

  • @dphunk87

    @dphunk87

    7 жыл бұрын

    In my class we learned that it cleaves c terminus of large hydrophobic residues, methionine included as well as the aromatic ones.

  • @alvinjesus100
    @alvinjesus1009 жыл бұрын

    Thanks for explaning....You do a great job....i had a question regarding activation energy of surface chemistry... amongst physisorption and chemisorption,which of the two has greater activation energy?

  • @rejathbenny1964

    @rejathbenny1964

    8 жыл бұрын

    +Akshat Bajpai It is evidently Chemisorption , simply because it involves a chemical reaction and needs activation energy . On the other hand , there is NO reaction taking place between the adsorbant and adsorbate during physisorption (but physical adsorption of gases involve condesation ). Am I clear ?

  • @alvinjesus100

    @alvinjesus100

    8 жыл бұрын

    Yeah!thankyou...

  • @pragatipandey7489
    @pragatipandey74897 жыл бұрын

    Thanku sir

  • @junczhang
    @junczhang8 жыл бұрын

    thank you so much! :)

  • @alejandrosalazar8332
    @alejandrosalazar83328 жыл бұрын

    thanks you rock !!!

  • @anjalimishra3917
    @anjalimishra39177 жыл бұрын

    You are choo cute AK..i love your lectures😍

  • @anooprao6380
    @anooprao63808 жыл бұрын

    At 8:32, if you don't know what the transition state looks like, how do you make transition state analogs? Thanks again for the video :)

  • @okpolihenry983

    @okpolihenry983

    2 жыл бұрын

    u can use an analog of the substrate to trap the reaction at its transition state , that's how we study the structure of the transition

  • @ashutoshkosariya191
    @ashutoshkosariya1912 жыл бұрын

    Love from india thank you sir

  • @freeflyer9482
    @freeflyer94829 жыл бұрын

    GREAT VIDEO

  • @AKLECTURES

    @AKLECTURES

    9 жыл бұрын

    Lior Marko Thanks Lior :)

  • @angelsantos7033
    @angelsantos70334 жыл бұрын

    thank u thank u thank u

  • @abdulbasitghauri8934
    @abdulbasitghauri8934 Жыл бұрын

    Can anyone tell me that what is K1 and K2 ??

  • @vijeta7792
    @vijeta77923 жыл бұрын

    Good

  • @criticalmindset8471
    @criticalmindset84716 жыл бұрын

    Why no sound???

  • @sierraandrewcavazos8371
    @sierraandrewcavazos83717 жыл бұрын

    cant hear sound:(

  • @JonathanR1994
    @JonathanR19947 жыл бұрын

    Brain goals

  • @patriciafritsch8917
    @patriciafritsch89177 жыл бұрын

    No sound 🙁

  • @dharashah3652
    @dharashah36527 жыл бұрын

    No sound

  • @luzlizardo9061
    @luzlizardo90612 жыл бұрын

    I love you

  • @edgarramirezhuerta1864
    @edgarramirezhuerta18643 жыл бұрын

    5-stars

  • @tahrimahmad5007
    @tahrimahmad50073 жыл бұрын

    👍👍👍👍

  • @giopast2702
    @giopast27027 жыл бұрын

    Sound

  • @carolinemangare3071
    @carolinemangare30717 жыл бұрын

    😔No sound

  • @AKLECTURES

    @AKLECTURES

    7 жыл бұрын

    Turn your volume on? ;-)

  • @carolinemangare3071

    @carolinemangare3071

    7 жыл бұрын

    AK LECTURES I did but still couldn't hear anything. Though I read your notes on the board. You are amazing. Thank you for your lectures!

  • @chemisthmh198

    @chemisthmh198

    7 жыл бұрын

    your explanation is wonderful 😊

  • @drkekeeeeeeee9144
    @drkekeeeeeeee91446 жыл бұрын

    Why doesn’t this video have sound or is it just me🤨

  • @criticalmindset8471

    @criticalmindset8471

    6 жыл бұрын

    Ekram M no me too