Great foul call. Official was in perfect position, and made a courageous--but absolutely correct--call.

@1Outis1

Жыл бұрын

I don't know, it looks like the picker push the defensive player into the shooter, but that was just from the two angles we saw.

@traysargent4933

7 ай бұрын

Missed the illegal screen on miss st

Looks like they got it right. Good job fellas.

@lukegardner4454

3 жыл бұрын

This time; and for the Georgia fan, you can't throw your stuff bulldog on the court.

Hmm makes you wonder. What if an away team was in this situation and had someone purposely throw something on the floor so they could get extra free throws or the ball back lol

@jansenbreitenstein6702

4 жыл бұрын

Joe Bob woah😳

@johnstarnes1925

3 жыл бұрын

My question exactly

@tntkop

2 жыл бұрын

Only an idiot would throw something onto the court.

@dangerfindertreasureseeker8905

2 жыл бұрын

I was thinking the same thing. Who threw it ?

@DarkTempler1

2 жыл бұрын

yoooo for real!!!!!!!!!!!!! that would be cheating

Fans should never be given techs. They are NOT part of the game!

@SarahDigsHockey

3 жыл бұрын

The fans didn't get the tech, the home team did.

Correct all the way around. Unfortunate situation though

Looks right to me!!! Hope you all are doing well and staying safe!!!

Only thing that was never confirmed before the tech...Who threw the object. It’s assumed it was the home team. This could now be an issue of visiting fans trying to get a “technical” on home teams if games are close - in my opinion. BTW - the end of game foul was a good call by the ref. Great positioning and coverage.

@andrew4029

3 жыл бұрын

Doesn't matter according to current rules. Rightly or wrongly, the technical will be called on the home team.

@philhaddad5495

2 жыл бұрын

I agree good call on foul and I agree with the assesment of techincal foul

@billwalters4338

2 жыл бұрын

Had an imbecile ref do that to us, said he heard a curse word from behind our bench at a 150 team tournament where ANYONE could be watching even if they weren't a fan of that team. Thought to myself the same thing I can go sit behind the visitor team and swear loudly. I used to ref football, had the referee overturn one of my calls "an interception" by a team winning by a big score, said he wanted to give the losing team another chance. After the game I chased him to his truck like a coward he jumped in and took off before i could put my hands on him.

@vitesse_arnhem

Жыл бұрын

@@billwalters4338 As justified as you may have been, sheriff’s deputies would not have agreed with you. Better to send the game tape to the assignor and end the ref’s career.

@billwalters4338

Жыл бұрын

@@vitesse_arnhem Did that

tom Crean with the intercom 💀💀💀

I couldn't hear what the Georgia coach said on the PA mic. Does anyone know?

If the fan didn't throw something on the court the game would have gone to overtime due to Miss St missing the other 2 free throws. Don't throw things onto the court people, it could cost your team the game..

@SarahDigsHockey

3 жыл бұрын

He missed the final free throw shot on purpose. If you take away the tech foul shot, he would not have tried to miss the second shot on purpose after missing the first.

@philliprunge

Жыл бұрын

Did you watch the video at all? Wow. Just wow.

Correct call! Otherwise, fans will do it again on the next game.

This was stupid...punishing a team for something a "fan" did....very dumb

@milart12

Жыл бұрын

Agreed. And it didn't affect the shot at all.

You don’t live in Cleveland you live in Cincinnati

I agree with the foul call definetly a block. the techincal ehhhhhhhhh how do you know who throw it. you're assuming it was the home team. Also it really didn;t affect the play at all.

Could have been opposing team fan, but 1) came from home team section....those folks would have been pointing culprit out. (Their silence says volumes. 2) doubt appoint team would have “planted” someone thinking this situation would arise, and 3) it has been my experience that college kids would be bright enough to think of it! LOL! 😂.......looks like the only call that could be made!

I need to get some new glasses, it looked like the defender hit the ball.

@sweetyd

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, he did. However, he hits his body with his hip while airborne and shooting. This is a foul.

So basically i should go to an awsy game, throw stuff. Eject and ban fan...no technical warranted, has nothing to do with players/coaches

Shooting foul: 100% correct. A fan throwing something onto the floor, I honestly don’t even know. I want to have more of an argument about what the refs did and did not do right, but I don’t even know where to begin with that.

If it was a technical foul, why were the lanes filled for second shot? Also, why was he not awarded the second of his two shot foul? Is college different in that area than high school? (Just wondering)

@OfficiatingBornVideos

9 ай бұрын

Pretty much all technical fouls at the NCAA level are enforced at the "point of interruption." That means that you shoot the free throws for the technical foul and then you go back to the place you were at the time of the technical foul. And that is both Class A and Class B technical fouls in almost every case. The only time we clear the lane in the NCAA is a Dead Ball Contact Technical where you give the ball to the team that was contacted. Otherwise, this is like every other technical foul at the NCAA level.

The shooting foul yes, the fan throwing object no because it was after the shot, didn’t hit anyone and didn’t affect the missed shot. No harm no foul. The fan should’ve been found, and banned from attending games again.

Tough gig. . .the rule goes against the house? Hardly a visitor fan in that situation would do that! I don't like both benches trying to heat up a tense situation!

How can you know it was a Georgia fan that threw the stuff animal

there is by rule the phrase of having direct knowledge on something I hope that official and the crew had direct knowledge as to which team that fan was for.. to properly penalize!

@MrGeneric2011

2 жыл бұрын

Refs had direct knowledge of a fan throwing an object onto the court. Which team the fan may have been rooting for is irrelevant. The technical for fan interference is assessed on the home team.

Did they catch the idiot that threw it and ban them for the rest of the season?

U have to know who threw it ,if you don't you can't call a technical for it. Only option is to clear the gym if more objects come out!

Happened well after the shot was off did see it until after he missed... No way to tell who threw it. Bad call...

@SarahDigsHockey

3 жыл бұрын

I agree. I think it was an overreaction by the refs. The commentator said that the tech foul was called to send a message to the fans to stop throwing things onto the court. The refs could have sent the the message by making an announcement that if it happened again, it would be a tech foul. If it happens a second time, then call the tech foul. The first shot was missed before the object landed on the court.

I think it's pretty funny that throwing a stuffed animal got a technical foul, but it's not the best one I've ever seen. That honor goes to a school band playing three blind mice.

help me understand why he only gets 1 technical foul shot?

@MrGeneric2011

2 жыл бұрын

That is the penalty assessed for that type of infraction, per the rules.

intentional misses like that arent allowed I thought

First call was right, but I feel like the second call was wrong. I can understand voiding the initial shot even though the item hit the floor after the shot was attempted, but it feels like the game was decided not by the players. I will say that the video lacks context if a warning was already issued, but I assume not since it would likely have been included then.

@paulsonj72

5 жыл бұрын

Under the NCAA-M rule set it is pretty much an automatic call in that situation to call the T. So the officials had no choice but to call the T despite the time remaining on the clock

@SgvSth

5 жыл бұрын

I guess I misunderstood the rule then. I do wish that things could have been decided just by on court actions.

@Minecraftmaster44

4 жыл бұрын

@@SgvSth disagree. Rules like these prevent fans from tossing stuff onto the floor and getting penalized for it. Without these rules these actions would happen more often.

@jasonspalding1253

4 жыл бұрын

@@Minecraftmaster44 Knowing these rules however for fans if your team is down and or its tied he missed his first free throw what would it stop a die hard fan from throwing something on the floor to give his team another chance....In that fact not much one can do unless point out the person who did it. Shouldn't be a T call on the home team.

@andrew4029

3 жыл бұрын

@@jasonspalding1253: Doesn't matter who throws it according to current rules. Rightly or wrongly, the technical will be called on the home team.

This is such a stupid foul! Like there is zero chance you are 100% sure which fan that is! There are fans for both teams at games this big! Like you legit cannot have a rule that impacts the actual game when you have no clue who to assess it to

Another situation were referee think fans are there to see them the foul was tixtic and technical was for something thar was throw after the ball left the player hands come on that should have been a warning

@thetrainwxgeek

3 жыл бұрын

Good call on the foul as he got the player down low. Also, in the rules it’s an automatic T if a fan throws something on the court during a free throw

That came from behind the visitors bench

@kristopherloviska9042

2 жыл бұрын

Are you high?

The black announcer is absolutely clueless on what is happening.

the object throwing by the fan definitely cost Georgia the game

I missed something here: The shooter hits the free throw despite the object coming on the court; a “T” is called, then that free throw is shot, THEN the other free throw for the original foul is shot? I thought that you first shoot the free throws for the foul, THEN you shoot any technical free throws?

@kristopherloviska9042

2 жыл бұрын

The reason the technical free throw attempt came next is because if the 2nd FT attempt is missed it is a live ball.

There were as there always are numerous technical fouls that weren't called. Rule book is clear. Any attempt to "influence the officials decision" is a technical foul.

So wait if my team is missing a free throw I can throw something on the court and get the team I'm for another chance at making the basket 🤔

Just because Georgia is home does not mean there are no Miss fans there. This is a stupid rule. I would go to every away game and in that situation I would throw my Barney doll on the court and het my guy and extra free throw. Then at the end of the season, I would confess and get them to change the rule or my friend will do it next year.

That was the right call. UGA fans are just trashy.

.5 left at the line. Shot gone, no interference, warning to crowd was enough

This is so stupid, I’m no Georgia fan but they cannot control if a fan throws something on the court technicals and flagrants should only be given to a team if they did something that they can control

@johnguedel7119

4 жыл бұрын

And who is to say a Mississippi St Han didn’t do it?

@asherriley4882

3 жыл бұрын

​@@johnguedel7119 That was my point in my reply to @gelarjor - In all likelihood, you do not...so given that, who gets a tech and why? Not safe to assume it was a jilted fan. Probably was...but not a certainty. Impossible to say whether he would have made that second free throw had the tech not happened...game easily could have gone to OT. Still either team's game.

I guess I would sort of understand the frustration if the foul was a close-ish call but that was a very blatant foul.. He hadn't even released the ball yet and he was run into by the defender, you can't sweep someone's legs like that and not have it be a foul. It was a stupid decision by Georgia to do that, just feels like inexperience.

Keep in mind, NFHS rules are different in this situation.