No video

Elite Janissary vs Every Civ Specific Hand Cannoneer | AoE II: DE

Elite Janissary vs Every Specific Hand Cannoneer
Both Imperial Age Fully Upgraded
00:00 Info
00:11 vs Generic HC
00:39 vs Bohemian HC
01:07 vs Burgundian HC
01:33 vs Gurjara HC
02:02 vs Hindustani HC
02:30 vs Italian HC
03:05 vs Portuguese HC
03:42 vs Spanish HC
04:09 vs Turkish HC
04:40 Thanks for Watching
I try each scenario more than once and show the average result.
BG Music: AoE 4 Ottomans Feudal Combat Theme
#aoe #aoe2de #ageofempires2

Пікірлер: 34

  • @graphitebendy
    @graphitebendy2 ай бұрын

    Should have used non-elite Jannisaries against Bohemians since their major bonus is Hand Cannons in Castle age

  • @HawkknightXC88
    @HawkknightXC882 ай бұрын

    Gunpowder Wars was brutal back in the Medieval Era.

  • @filipbaselides6498

    @filipbaselides6498

    2 ай бұрын

    The ones with swords, spears and axes were too. I think that every war method back in the day was wild.

  • @shavaizkhan8165

    @shavaizkhan8165

    Ай бұрын

    @@filipbaselides6498 Yup and modern day war is all flowers 😅

  • @humanbass
    @humanbassАй бұрын

    Portuguese did way better than I expected. The extra accuracy was much more important than the Spanish faster firing rate

  • @jasonsmith1950
    @jasonsmith19502 ай бұрын

    Big takeaways: extra range is huge (Hindustanis slaughtered their opposing janissaries) and discounts are very beneficial (Italians won by a sizable margin; Portuguese were an almost-even fight; Gurjaras didn't do so well but are missing an armor upgrade, resulting in them getting 2-shot). Burgundians extra attack (and lower armor), Spanish faster firing, and Turk extra hp are a bit better than generic, but not that much of an improvement. Bohemian, in this test, may as well be generic. Only comparison left would be "generic" missing ring archer armor (i.e. Georgians, who technically have a hill bonus that's irrelevant to these tests, and Franks) - I'd expect that this would be much worse than generic due to the way breakpoints work.

  • @jaikumar848

    @jaikumar848

    2 ай бұрын

    Also hindustanis had extra +1 pierce armour

  • @widodoakrom3938

    @widodoakrom3938

    Ай бұрын

    Don't forget Hindustani has armor and piece armor +1

  • @CaesarCJ15
    @CaesarCJ152 ай бұрын

    So why does Portuguese go with 23 units like a regular civ since they have a 20% discount in gold cost?

  • @hosykamikaze3626

    @hosykamikaze3626

    2 ай бұрын

    turks had -2 units

  • @CaesarCJ15

    @CaesarCJ15

    2 ай бұрын

    @@hosykamikaze3626 OH my bad, didnt notice that by watching it from my phone 11

  • @dirkauditore8413
    @dirkauditore84132 ай бұрын

    Quality content, do more with this format, thnx.

  • @saadjahangir8677
    @saadjahangir86772 ай бұрын

    Nice video Keep up the good work

  • @widodoakrom3938
    @widodoakrom3938Ай бұрын

    Only Hindustani and Italian capable to win

  • @lscibor
    @lscibor2 ай бұрын

    Could be done at least few times each, because there's quite a lot RNG going on with handcannoners in AoE2, at least compared to most other units. Though it would obviously take lots of work. :D

  • @Walenaoe

    @Walenaoe

    2 ай бұрын

    I try each scenario more than once and show the average result.

  • @Apocalypse9696
    @Apocalypse96962 ай бұрын

    there was also a HC that got 100% accuracy, i think it was portugese due to arquebus upgrade

  • @buiquanghuy135

    @buiquanghuy135

    2 ай бұрын

    No, being able to hit moving targets is not the same as 100% accuracy

  • @zhelwankarkuky9173
    @zhelwankarkuky91732 ай бұрын

    Portuguese can win with micro

  • @ichigogunner12345
    @ichigogunner123452 ай бұрын

    I think hindustanis will do the best

  • @Walenaoe

    @Walenaoe

    2 ай бұрын

    agree

  • @nimr0del763
    @nimr0del7632 ай бұрын

    i don't think there was a consistent result because you didn't arrange the units properly

  • @Walenaoe

    @Walenaoe

    2 ай бұрын

    I expect you to explain how to properly position the units.

  • @spookynya3066
    @spookynya30662 ай бұрын

    So, is the Janissary better than a Hand Cannoner? Yes and no. Janissary beats HC, but doesn't have the vs infantry bonus. Is essentially a HC that instead of being "really good vs infantry but bad against anything else" is "good against almost everything, especially mele units with high pierce armor".

  • @tomyrobinson3196

    @tomyrobinson3196

    2 ай бұрын

    The Elite Janissary gets half the hand cannoneer's attack bonus baked into its base attack

  • @spookynya3066

    @spookynya3066

    2 ай бұрын

    @@tomyrobinson3196 yes, but bonus damage ignores armor, so while HC does 11 bonus damage against infantry no matter how much pierce armor they have, Jenissary's attacks can still be greatly reduced.

  • @user-jm5bl5ex6w

    @user-jm5bl5ex6w

    2 ай бұрын

    No, janissary upgrade is expensive and turk have free chemical ,no one will upgrade .

  • @PawSmalls

    @PawSmalls

    2 ай бұрын

    ​@@spookynya3066 you're already doing way more damage than what any unit can have as pierce armor, so the difference in damage type doesn't matter here.

  • @cmlcml415
    @cmlcml4152 ай бұрын

    Hindustanis HC is da big daddy 😂

  • @longyanshang
    @longyanshang2 ай бұрын

    Updates are a bit slow

  • @Walenaoe

    @Walenaoe

    2 ай бұрын

    wdym

  • @raulrossi9735
    @raulrossi97352 ай бұрын

    I think Turks are purple too 😊

  • @brownpleasure9320
    @brownpleasure932027 күн бұрын

    hindustani gunpowder need nerf, to strong. turkish gunmen should be the best in the game