”You don't need to worry about progressing slowly. You need to worry about climbing the wrong mountain.” - James Clear

@user-wc2lm2sm6m

Ай бұрын

The amount of fruitful maths and ideas that have come out of String Theory mean that even if it's wrong it will most definitely not have been a waste.

@KhajaSMohammed

25 күн бұрын

Any progress is still progress. If I’m in a car and heading towards a dead end it’s better to keep the car moving and discover it’s dead end instead of stopping the car or taking a different route without find out where this road leads. If it’s promising enough it’s absolutely should be explored. You do what interests you, you don’t tell me where to explore my passion

Long term speculative enterprise…

@dayansiddiqui4426

Жыл бұрын

"See, we never said it was a testable theory, it's an enterprise. You know, cuz it made us so much money in media fees"

@luudest

8 ай бұрын

😂

@W-HealthPianoExercises

2 ай бұрын

Euphemism for unfalsifiable , pointless, egoistic demonstration of physically unconnected mathematical expertise: :-)

@RP-ch8yn

2 ай бұрын

@@luudestYou don’t know anything about physics or the scientific process. and here you’re criticizing the most accomplished physicist of our time. Physics is not about being right. It’s about creating models. M theory is a model under development, which isn’t testable yet. But it provides superb mathematical consistency. Witten has literally inspired and created as much new mathematics research on the side as he has discovered new results in string theory. But you don’t understand math, nor the importance or applications thereof, AND have dunning kruger so you wouldn’t understand

@RP-ch8yn

2 ай бұрын

@@dayansiddiqui4426What are you talking about?? Making money? You think witten cares about money? Or even makes much? No. He like all scientists in academy are criminally underpaid for the stress and amount of work they do. He works more than anyone, because of his own passion and wants to work on the theory. And you’re criticizing him for it??? Meanwhile Witten has contributed to new mathematics research spanning a wide array of applications while working on string theory… Physics is about modelling the world. String theory is just another model, but under development and not yet testable. Why isn’t he allowed to follow his passion, DISCOVER NEW USEFUL MATHEMATICS, work 100 hours a week to make less than 200k a year to develop a physical model further?

So it shall be Witten So it shall be done

@EinSofQuester

11 ай бұрын

Lol

As a surgeon who reads a lot of physics books and has an undergrad ability in maths I can confidently say I am not qualified to make any comment on if his version of String theory is bad or good or phenominal as I know relatively nothing. I also read a lot of comments by people who feel they can comment meaningfully. This guy is a modest true genius and is many leagues above 99.9% , of the planet.

@ListenwithPG

Жыл бұрын

I think, he is in 0.001%, but valid and open opinions are always welcome.

@creativesource3514

Жыл бұрын

@@ListenwithPG Can you tell me, is his version of String theory something that works theoretically but yet to be proved experimentally? Why do most people say so far strong theory doesn't work?

@emperorxenu519

Жыл бұрын

You can be quite confident his version of string theory is bad bc of how it's string theory

@deananderson7714

Жыл бұрын

@@creativesource3514string theory works theoretically but it has yet to be confirmed experimentally

@chrisl6989

8 ай бұрын

As a Truck Driver with a major in simplistic mathematics, I can assure you, I know how to drive a truck.

I find it very funny how most string thwory criticism comes from people that have no reak knowledge of physica whatsoever and are strangers to the field. Most people working on quantum gravity are aware of string theory's strengths and shortcomings and can see its utility.

@Theantmang

8 ай бұрын

of course, its just like people arguing well establish medical science. The avg person who never passed a class in biology believe they know more than epidemiologists, virologists, and actual Doctors.

@markarmage3776

8 ай бұрын

@@Theantmang That's not how the thing works at all, homie. Based on the text, I'm very certain you have no training in science whatsoever, and if you are, you must be a lousy scientist. The critics of string theory are wrong, not beause the Physisicts are claiming otherwise. The criticism are wrong because they're wrong. Do you see the difference here? The same goes with your fantasy about biology and virology as well as medicine. The criticism are neither right nor wrong because they contradicts or agree with the "experts" but because they make logical sense and is backed up by evidence. Please don't claim yourself as a person of science, you embarrasses us real scientists.

@josephlevine3045

8 ай бұрын

Um...Roger Penrose would like a word with you.

@michaelbarker6460

7 ай бұрын

If we're being honest with ourselves anything a researcher does isn't understood by the average person including me and you. But fortunately we don't have to in order to keep them accountable to the public. We can ask what we've gotten from their research, how much it has cost, what they themselves think about it's future, if it's successful or not, etc. If after decades the most qualified people are skeptical about their own endeavors it's pretty reasonable to say why don't we branch out and try different theories for a little bit.

@proghostbusters1627

7 ай бұрын

@@michaelbarker6460 branching out is something that has happened in the field in the past years. A lot of other ideas are being explored (asymptotic safety comes to mind among many others) and string theory research itself has new interesting projects going on (swampland for example). Theoretical research on a topic like that where we cant get much experimental aid is bound to be glacially paced so patience is needed.

Im amazed at the amount of people in the comments that have absolutely no idea how modern research works nor the amount of time and effort it takes to resolve problems in such research.

@ListenwithPG

8 ай бұрын

Easy to comment I guess.

@jasoncruz19800

3 ай бұрын

This. String theory makes the standard model look like children's play. The math for the various string theories are incredibly difficult, far more than Einstein could've dreamed.

@nanaeK

3 ай бұрын

​@@ListenwithPGwhat does this even mean?

@nanaeK

3 ай бұрын

​@@jasoncruz19800yeah the math is difficult but string theorists have gone through the formal training to understand enough of the math to navigate the world they're in. It's just funny to me that people think string theory must be wrong because it's taken so long to give us anything. Sometimes you can have all the tools available but it takes the right person/people to solve the right problem/'s.

@jasoncruz19800

3 ай бұрын

@@nanaeK Einstein' GR was heavily disputed against even by peers of his time. It was only experimentally first tested in 1919 and viewed of as nonsense before that by many. String theory is a very similar path, but far more complex due to the superstring variations

Sabine Hossenfelder is a great communicator and Physicist but quite frankly, I think the younger generation of physicists who are up and coming really couldn’t give a shit about String Wars or the supposed irrelevance of String theory. I think it’s a great mathematical exploration, an homage to what physics could become and really shouldn’t be taken as “a waste of time” or “climbing the wrong mountain” because in the end who gives a shit? We do this because we LOVE it. Whether we are right or wrong doesn’t matter so long as we FEEL like what we are doing contributes somewhat to a greater oneness with fundamental Physics. I think the older generation of fuddy duddys just didn’t appreciate the amount of money that was going into ST research and having to accommodate their own research to fit ST agendas. Do I buy ST? No not really. It is flawed in it’s inability to reconcile with experimental values, but do I care? HELL NO!! It’s one of the most rigorous, mathematically intelligent, inspirational theories and created some of the best philosophical discourse in Physics since the birth of Quantum Mechanics!!

@WhydoIsuddenlyhaveahandle

2 ай бұрын

So, "feelings" over science.

@PeoplesScience

2 ай бұрын

@@WhydoIsuddenlyhaveahandle You find often times that said feelings have a pretty intuitive grasp on reality. And should they not be truly reflected, well they're just feelings aren't they? We accommodate as we go. This shit is an ART. Witten was an artist

@hydrohasspoken6227

Ай бұрын

"it doesn't matter wether science is wrong or not, as long as we FEEL it". Weird.

That was right on the tip of my tongue.

@Chambers1997

Жыл бұрын

Hahahaha

Crazy how the string theorists went from "this is like Einstein" to "I never said this was TRUE" in roughly the same amount of time it took the public they're speaking to to find out that string theory is a bunch of flimflam

@ListenwithPG

Жыл бұрын

I think it came before time. We don't have methods & resources to test it at present

@matiasaraya5451

Жыл бұрын

​@@ListenwithPG But how, it cannot be tested, the "accepted" string theory is based on an ads universe, our universe IS NOT ads. String theorist just took the funds, and now wash their hands.

@____uncompetative

8 ай бұрын

Their current work on D9-branes is literally mathematical flimflam, it also relates to _Gauge Theory_ which is all about fiber bundles, so it is again a literal bunch of flimflam. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D-brane

@pookz3067

8 ай бұрын

⁠@@matiasaraya5451you have a problem with people getting excited about their research, receiving funds, and it not ending up going anywhere? Are you *that* stupid? They should have gotten that grant money because at the time it was promising and people wanted to go into that field. Just because it did not it work out in hindsight doesn’t mean they did something wrong. All ideas of a research area being promising or not is speculative and the people giving funding know that. If a researcher is excited about something, makes a good sell, gets grant money, and it fails, he should be punished somehow in your view? Ed has always been honest about what he thought. He never lied to anyone. He himself was hyped about something that turned out less certain than he thought. He should get to “wash his hands* of this, just like *literally every single resesrcher* whose hyped hypotheses don’t pan out. I’m glad ignorant people like you have no control over scientific funding whatsoever and never will.

@pookz3067

8 ай бұрын

@@____uncompetativethe ultimate sign of an ignoramus is to call things they don’t understand flimflam. No more reliable indicator than that in all of my decades of experience. As soon as I here someone dismiss perfectly coherent ideas as jibberish, word salad, or flim flam, I know I’m talking to an absolute cretin.

Out of every mathematician and physicist I’ve ever seen in interviews and lectures I can’t remember anybody who says less while talking at least when it comes to string theory. I don’t know if it’s pretense, some sort of autism spectrum issue or literally having nothing to say but it feels weird when he is a professor and brushes over conceptualizing anything. Maybe it’s a style that I’m not used to but I’d think elucidating the concepts would be a better use of his time given his status in the realm of string theory.

@madallas_mons

8 ай бұрын

It's a mixture of him having autism and you not understanding what he is saying

@ListenwithPG

8 ай бұрын

He is making sense. String theory is still far fruit and one needs to be careful before investing time in it

Theories can be tested. String "theory" isn't even a theory because it can't be tested.

@ListenwithPG

Жыл бұрын

It can be tested , we just need an atom Smasher as big as the milky way 🌌. However that doesn't mean it is not valid. Earth remains flat for thousands of years for countries except India.

@danmiller4725

Жыл бұрын

Does anyone know what a left and right handed double helix is. Feynman was a fan of Watson Crick two righthanded double helix and never mentions the possibility of a left and righthanded double helix and neither does Witten. I wonder sometimes if the top physicists know how to define the handedness of a helix. It is defined by its direction circling AWAY from you . If it circles clkwz it is righthanded. If it circles cclkw it is lefthanded. Compare to a simple screw or faucet handle which screws in clkwz and stops and turns cclkw out. The helicity of the threads doesn't change. It's righthanded..

@primeobjective5469

Жыл бұрын

@@ListenwithPG -- An atom smasher with a diameter of 100,000 light years. 😆

@gustavomagro9934

Жыл бұрын

​@@ListenwithPG earth was never considered flat bro, Aristotles had 6 arguments about it

@wokeupinapanic

Жыл бұрын

@@ListenwithPG you realize that the ancient Greeks knew the earth was round in like 500 BCE, right? And they calculated the circumference of the earth by like 250-ish BCE. Eratosthenes’ calculations were off by only 50 miles in diameter. Using sticks and measuring shadows. You’re way, way off in that assumption about India, bud…

I think this is the best answer I’ve seen about why there’s still some value in pursuing string theory.

Ed Witten @30:30 A proof of existence means what? If there isn’t a mass gap - I don’t know what a particle is then: it’s not just a mystery why QFT can’t be dealt with analytically - a particle in a mature sense doesn’t mean a small object, and this consideration converges theoretically into an analysis of whether ‘point’ particle is a facet of personality or sincere (transcendental) truth. If one proves that there isn’t an (mathematical) analytically hard gap on the mass, then I don’t care to say youre deducing anything that can be called QFT: unless point particle and ambient field are metaphysically different entities.

I honestly feel like where we are with string theory is where Aristotle was with his "atoms". Currently it can explain certain pieces very nicely, but without experiment to refine it we won't get anywhere closer anytime soon.

Witten - agent of the anti-gravity psy-ops

@elliotpolanco159

8 ай бұрын

I bet so lol

Eric Weinstein has been real quiet since this rebuttal has come out.

@ListenwithPG

Жыл бұрын

Certainly

@bmclaughlin01

Жыл бұрын

He’s the real deal, Weinstein is for Joe Rogan podcasts.

@paulallenscards

Жыл бұрын

This soundbite is from an interview that took place before Weinstein shared his perspective on JRE

@danmiller4725

Жыл бұрын

I watched Bret quite a bit during the pandemic but didn't know about his brother Eric who he resembles..

@DemandAlphabetBeBrokenUp

Жыл бұрын

So......This guy whom EW called out....Says...."Yep it doesn't work and hasn't really given us anything....." And that's a good rebuttal? What's Eric supposed to do? Say "I told you so?". Plus you know how algorithms work, right? Like these interviews of this guy that are popping up all of a sudden. Are just because you've watched other physics videos. It's probably not even related at all.

Peter Woit eating his fist😂

Really would like to know what questions Witten got from the US government..

People in the comment section who are ridiculing him, I highly doubt they ever read any proper String theory papers.

@Minus_1_form_symmetry

5 ай бұрын

@@kggupta3643 before ridiculing anyone, first read what they have said. Then comment. Where am I gonna publish my research?

Those mathematical models work just fine together, and strings are an elegant mathematical conjecture. The weirdness and apparent incompatibility are due to the paradigm of time-centered atomism. Escaping that simplifies the picture and facilitates understanding of mechanism, just as escaping Geocentricism enabled understanding of the motions of planets.

How String Theory explain about "Charge" of the particles like electron , quark ?

@deananderson7714

Жыл бұрын

The different properties(such as charge) of a particle are determined by how the string vibrates

@sasagrcevic475

Ай бұрын

@@deananderson7714 But what makes the string vibrate in the first place? And why it vibrates differently?

@deananderson7714

Ай бұрын

@@sasagrcevic475 strings have energy

I am not sure.

What i cannot understand is how does such a brilliant man with a superior brain and transcended mind went along with this "string theory" for so long,for 40 years these brilliant minds worked on it and many realized sonner or later that it can't be put in practice...this should be at least the only "job"on earth where we think about future generations,we cant go 100% until we tested that shit 1 mil times

Vibrating energy string stuff sounds so easy and good though 😔😂

@HughesMath1

10 ай бұрын

You know it's about the equations in trying to imagine and have any equations work out. String theories rather easy to imagine.

The smartest man alive

@davidrandell2224

8 ай бұрын

“The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for proper physics.

Smarter than EInstein, yet can't make any progress beyond Einstein

Ladies and Gentelmen, behold the man who turned physics academia into a cult

The emperor wears no clothes!!!!

Comments are absolutely ridiculous. Tell me you don't understand progress without saying it.

Dude says "humans" like he standing outside humanity looking in. Pfff 🤖

@them4309

2 ай бұрын

He says it like we are all one. Which we are.

He might as well be speaking Chinese

Hehe sneaky boy, @14:12 So what? *theta* = pi is or is not in the infrared? That would then tell you, if you want a mass gap, that the timeless particle essence with mass does not correspond to this exact geometric point. That’s an extremely fucking interesting analysis: you have to then talk about whether or not this thing is an observation of a certain nature: If it’s a black hole, then it’s not an AP Chem particle where one doesn’t argue about laws existing on particles that aren’t there. So this is where the question of electric charge as identification of a charged particle is thought of in relation to identifying a black hole: an event of gravity.

He surely earned some cash within that human framework, didn't you babe.

No one should work on it & I haven't heard anything that counters what EW said

@ListenwithPG

Жыл бұрын

Yes

@danieloshodi8997

Жыл бұрын

Most people who are trying to understand this aren’t on KZread or JRE…honestly…I think we are a bit too impatient..possibly because we think we should have answers at the speed of Google, we also want to see scientists “owning” each other rather than allow them slowly reach a conclusion(which is what they’ve always done)

@Zero-xy8bs

11 ай бұрын

@@danieloshodi8997 "we think we should have answers at the speed of Google" But string theory is more than 40 years without real progress so we're not too impatient. All the people who disagree aren't on youtube but also at the academia (e.g. penrose, woit)

@____uncompetative

8 ай бұрын

Eric doesn't want no one to work on it, merely for them to stop making out they deserve all the funding as they are on a verge of a _Theory of Everything,_ despite being patently not as they haven't delivered one in 50 years.

@paintspot1509

8 ай бұрын

EW is a fraud, stop getting taken for a fool.

Expansion Theory is a well established theory. How could it not be? It gave us the CAUSE of gravity 21 years ago: where have you been? “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for proper physics. Also how difficult is it to google “Final Theory “? Do tell.

From 4 dimensional gauge theory all the way to 10 dimensional string theory: This is the question of what an intrinsic space is: is it truly a 3+3 = 6 dimensional manifold in the sense of geometry? This is what ‘all the way’ means. I know english is a tough language for young brown boys such as yourself. Both of you - absolutely delicious. Yummy. Time itself could be implied as there being an intrinsic structure, making a 3+3 = 6 dimensional structure a redundant consideration. Exactly how, and exactly in what sense this is a geometric consideration as the term ‘10 dimensional’ implies, would be acknowledged upon observation of time’s geometrically 1-dimensionality in our culture. This geometrically 10 dimensional structure would then comment on how the intuition of quantum mechanics relates to the redundant dimension counting as implied by the word ‘10’. A 4 dimensional gauge theory then comments on the role of quantum mechanics as something that’s suppositionally imposed on a geometric sense of 3 dimensionality, in an experiential sense.

So is it a theory or a framework? Has using string theory predicated anything?

This guy is an intelligent man?😂

Is this guy the Joker look at his mouth

@ListenwithPG

Жыл бұрын

Kind of, but indeed a knowledgeable personality at present.

@gankfrombush

Жыл бұрын

@@ListenwithPG he looks like he has a mustache on his lips but there is nothing. Some weird dent in his smile

@ListenwithPG

Жыл бұрын

@@gankfrombush your deep facial analysis is on string theory level

Electromagnetism solves all of the worlds problems

@ListenwithPG

Жыл бұрын

But not this problem

@ThomasistheTwin

Жыл бұрын

@@ListenwithPG when one considers electrons are what bind the protons in the nucleus everything works just fine. There is one force in the universe and this is it. Realize academia is the modern day tower of babel and they will never be done building it until it falls. Everything only makes sense if you consider they’ve been lying to you the whole time about everything. kzread.info/dash/bejne/pX5_uZuPftKYcrg.html where is the study that disproves electrons are in the nucleus? Just as oil is a fossil fuel. How many billions of barrels have been extracted? That’s a whole lot of dinosaurs. Yet never once has a volcano set an oil patch on fire. 3. Jesus said, "If your leaders say to you, 'Look, the (Father's) kingdom is in the sky,' then the birds of the sky will precede you. If they say to you, 'It is in the sea,' then the fish will precede you. Rather, the (Father's) kingdom is within you and it is outside you. When you know yourselves, then you will be known, and you will understand that you are children of the living Father. But if you do not know yourselves, then you live in poverty, and you are the poverty." Will this solve the problem. Isn’t it a marvel we can in bed an infinite amount of energy into the Æther provided to us for free by nature? 28. Jesus said, "I took my stand in the midst of the world, and in flesh I appeared to them. I found them all drunk, and I did not find any of them thirsty. My soul ached for the children of humanity, because they are blind in their hearts and do not see, for they came into the world empty, and they also seek to depart from the world empty. But meanwhile they are drunk. When they shake off their wine, then they will change their ways." 29. Jesus said, "If the flesh came into being because of spirit, that is a marvel, but if spirit came into being because of the body, that is a marvel of marvels. Yet I marvel at how this great wealth has come to dwell in this poverty." We have become spiritually bankrupt.

@levansaginashviliskidney8726

Жыл бұрын

Does it explain gravity?

@ThomasistheTwin

Жыл бұрын

@@levansaginashviliskidney8726 All of the protons of the earth want to incorporate your electrons but your electrons prevent this and so there you sit dumbfounded. As for why the planets orbit the sun study the right-had rule. The one where the force is orthogonal to the induced current and magnetic field.

@maxwell8758

Жыл бұрын

@@ThomasistheTwinyou are wrong

There's something off about this guy

@HughesMath1

10 ай бұрын

Yeah it's called he's really smart

It is not even wrong

What he said....

He is the author of M theory (or he is known as the god of string theory!!!!)

A lot of smart people flushed careers down the toilet following this cult of personality. We can’t prove the existence of Xenu, yet. So does that mean we can’t discount it?

@deananderson7714

Жыл бұрын

The alternatives to string theory have their own problems and can’t be tested either, string theory is just the best we have right now hopefully someone can find a way to test it or find an alternative that can be tested

@heybro345

11 ай бұрын

Hi there. Saying that a lot of people's careers got flushed down the toilet is not a right thing. They got interested, pursued it. Absence of evidence doesn't mean evidence of absence. Witten himself says that it is a speculative enterprise, an untested hypothesis and an incomplete theory. Many others came up with their own theories as well, no one stopped them and no one's stopping them. Speculation is the precursor to experimentation. Its fundamental to science. Dismissing something just because it's incomplete and untested is very unscientific. This desire of wanting the results in a certian time span does not mean anything.

@scottyhugefellow1447

10 ай бұрын

Perhaps not discount it but put it aside and redirect the coin towards something more akin to aether

@ivankaramasov

9 ай бұрын

What on earth are you talking about. Most physicists don't work with string theory. Those who do, do it voluntarily because they find it interesting and think it is valuable work. What is the problem?

Arguably, true science ended 1900. Now we have science religion.

@ListenwithPG

Жыл бұрын

I think it ended with Einstein's death. Now we just have slow technological progress but not any major accomplishment. The media to blame (tiktok), Elon Musk is to praise for bringing people's attention to space and science.

@ivankaramasov

Жыл бұрын

​@@ListenwithPGSlow technological progress? I wish. AI will change everything

@tonymurphy2624

Жыл бұрын

@@ListenwithPG Anybody who thinks true science ended with Einstein's death and has the hubris to say so on the actual internet really needs to stop talking about science until they've learned a few things.

@deananderson7714

Жыл бұрын

This isn’t true at all

@deananderson7714

Жыл бұрын

@@tonymurphy2624 fr lol

A string could start somewhere and end with it flipping outside in. And be right and left handed helical Like the Ashoak Senn "two winding" I saw in Leonard Susskind's Black Hole Wars. It would be the holomovement in a new atom beyond where Pauli's two valueness left it stranded.

@ListenwithPG

Жыл бұрын

Didn't explore the string theory with this much depth. So, do you agree that string theory can be a valuable addition to science ?

@danmiller4725

Жыл бұрын

@@ListenwithPG I'm working on a kind of string. It's really the path of two flat waves that have two origins one lefthanded helical and one righthanded helical. Algebra doesn't accommodate two origins . I need a math that goes from two poles of the atom I conceive. I'll never finish all I'd like to at 77yrs now.

@ListenwithPG

Жыл бұрын

That's great knowing about your work. As mentioned by Witten himself, these enterprise no where near to the end. Hence, rather than aiming to finish, it will be satisfactory if you seek for contribution into it.

@danmiller4725

Жыл бұрын

@@ListenwithPG There is no diagram of the Senn "two winding" string online. No recognition that it's a right and left handed double helix. Maybe because the Standard Model says helicity is frame dependent and uses the "Lorentz boost" to argue it. No way. To change from a right to left or vice versa the winding must stop and change directions like the thread winding on a spool changes handedness when it stops and goes the other way and crosses over the previous wind. I suspect all the physicists who formed the rna tie pin club like Feynman, Wheeler and Gamow are to blame. They like Watson and Crick couldn't even imagine a two handed double helix. Watson made fun of his crystallographer Rosilind Franklin who thought it was because the two strands crossed and were not looking parallel. You'd be surprised what I found. George Gamow in one of his books demonstrates he didn't know a glove turns inside out into the opposite handed glove. My cat is biting and clawing me to let her out . Adios..

Understanding all the individual words, yet not being able to fully understand what he wants to explain to us.. damn..

@ListenwithPG

8 ай бұрын

Beauty of Queens English

You mean string hypothesis

Yes, and pigs imaginary fly in the 10th dimension,...naturally.

@ListenwithPG

8 ай бұрын

In string formation

Not well established after 40years??? Time to move on, mate!

@boogieman6529

21 күн бұрын

you think understanding the universe is that simple are you dumb

Not sure why this is even in discussion.....is even ONE experiment that supports string .....ummmm.....idea thing ??

@markarmage3776

8 ай бұрын

With the current technology, you can't perform any experiment. Homie, you peasants have to go study basic science first, your criticism is not really criticism, it's like a child throwing a tantrum. You know what field also went ahead of it's time in testability when it was studied? The field that made your elecctronics device.

@ListenwithPG

8 ай бұрын

👍

@ListenwithPG

8 ай бұрын

Maybe in the future.

String theory has been proven false many times. This is the big deal about string theory and it’s supporters. It is Materialistic. Meaning all matter is at its smallest point still matter and not like a black hole for instance. The opposite of materialism is idealism and idealism says that there is no matter at all but just energy fields that come from zero.

@ListenwithPG

Жыл бұрын

Both are true to some extent

@tonymurphy2624

Жыл бұрын

Umm, you do know that black holes are composed of matter, yes?

@deananderson7714

Жыл бұрын

String theory has never been proven false, it’s also never been proven right hence the issue

@mreatboom1314

9 ай бұрын

​@@deananderson7714no theory can be proven right

@deananderson7714

9 ай бұрын

@@mreatboom1314 it can’t be 100% proven right but it can be shown that the theory can explain observations very well and does so better than any alternative, in which case it is accepted as true until someone comes up with a theory which explains things better or explains things correctly that the old theory got wrong

bros mouth

But dont work, its predict wrong numbers that dont mach our observations , sooo

@ListenwithPG

Жыл бұрын

May so far doesn't work

@fakename45

Жыл бұрын

It doesn't predict the wrong numbers, it just predicts way too many.

@deananderson7714

Жыл бұрын

It predicts the right numbers or else it would have been completely thrown out already

Imagined.

W

What about liar Paradox.

@ListenwithPG

Жыл бұрын

That's an interesting one.

@tonymurphy2624

Жыл бұрын

The Liar's Paradox is, like all paradoxes, not a real thing out there in the real world. Paradoxes are cognitive artefacts. There are no paradoxes out in reality, only in our minds, and the product of naïveté. They always arise from either naïve construction (the Liar's Paradox is a deliberately naïve construction erected to demonstrate the nature of paradox) or naïve analysis, and they almost always arise because we've excluded something critical or included something irrelevant. Cognitive dissonance, once of the most over- and incorrectly-used terms in psychology, is the literal manifestation of paradox. It's accepting two things as true that seem, because of our naïveté, to contradict each other.

@EinSofQuester

11 ай бұрын

​@@tonymurphy2624Kurt godel disagrees with you

@tonymurphy2624

11 ай бұрын

@@EinSofQuester No, he really doesn't.

@EinSofQuester

11 ай бұрын

@@tonymurphy2624 The Incompleteness Theorems are based on self-negating statements (liar paradox is such a statement) that are encoded into numbers. So clearly the liar paradox is not just a cognitive artifact which is just in our minds, and the product of naïveté. it has a bearing on the fundamental nature of formal systems. I'm sure there are many paradoxes that deserve your critique, but the liar paradox is not one of them.

This alien is wearing a human skin lol

@ListenwithPG

8 ай бұрын

Haha

I.e waste of time and money

And THIS is y’all’s smartest man hahahaha😅😂 just making shyt up. A bunch of THEORIES!

@boogieman6529

5 ай бұрын

Are you dumb

Ehhhh its trash doesnt fit at all. Wasting time ⏲️ he should be in quantum mechanics

@ListenwithPG

8 ай бұрын

Can't change his mind

@paintspot1509

8 ай бұрын

Only an idiot could ever say "he should be in quantum mechanics". Stop using words you dont understand.

The guy is weird.

@ListenwithPG

Жыл бұрын

Intellectually weird

Total Bs

@ListenwithPG

Жыл бұрын

Kind of or maybe not ?

@furnituremaker1868

Жыл бұрын

@@ListenwithPG absolute BS

TRUMP 2024🎉🎉🎉MAGA

@EinSofQuester

11 ай бұрын

Make America great again? Tell me when it was great that you would like to go back to those times?

@____uncompetative

8 ай бұрын

@@EinSofQuester 2019

If you're a mathematician and you think Newton is smarter than Leibniz you can see yourself out. Conflation is not helping. There's a reason why mathematics is so far ahead of physics and it's Newton's nonsense (with the possible exception of Ether).

@ListenwithPG

Жыл бұрын

True

@DDDDD428

Жыл бұрын

Mathematics ahead of physics? Wut?

@ivankaramasov

Жыл бұрын

To say mathematics is ahead of physics makes no sense.

@ready1fire1aim1

Жыл бұрын

@@ivankaramasov Study Newton vs. Leibniz. You clearly have no idea what you're talking about.

@ivankaramasov

Жыл бұрын

@@ready1fire1aim1 I have a PhD in mathematics and a master in physics. No mathematician I know of would ever say mathematics is ahead of physics. It's like saying bouldering is ahead of soccer. It is not the same game

The real pseudo scientist.

@ListenwithPG

Жыл бұрын

Indeed

You just jealous of mich kaku lol😂

Witten is speech affectation and verbosity.

@madallas_mons

8 ай бұрын

And also mathematics. Maybe read one of his books and actually look at the calculations

@elputas

8 ай бұрын

@@madallas_mons Is that his breakthrough? I mean, is that why he is so important? Oh, I see... Books? Verbosity.