Ebert & Roeper (2000): Drowning Mona, My Dog Skip, The Next Best Thing & Miss Julie
0:00 Intro
0:52 Drowning Mona: 👎👎
4:15 My Dog Skip: 👍👍
7:55 What Planet Are You From? Ebert 👎 & Roeper 👍
11:44 The Next Best Thing: 👎👎
14:59 Miss Julie: Ebert 👍 & Roeper 👎
Video pick of the week
18:07 The John Belushi Collection
Animal House (1978)
The Blues Brothers (1980)
1941 (1979)
19:26 The reviews
Пікірлер: 22
Their comments on Miss Julie were unforgettable!
I got a full recording of this episode too, with commercials and all.
I agree with Richard Roeper’s review of What Planet Are You From?
10:17 my reaction when I heard a woman say “The Happytime Murders” was funnier than “Roger Rabbit.”
Richard Roper: He's an attractive young boy
@DeanStrickson
3 жыл бұрын
Roeper gave 3 appendages up for Agent Cody Banks.
@Hellraiser0601
3 жыл бұрын
Yep, he really said that.
@musicman76enator
3 жыл бұрын
What Roeper meant was that Frankie Muniz has a great screen presence and people will watch the movies that he's in. It had nothing to do with what you think it was. It was so way not that.
@ArizonanSummer
4 ай бұрын
Come on, you know what he meant. Get your head out of the gutters.
A Los Angeles Yoga Instructor named Abbey-That's funny:)
Next Best Thing was directed by John Schlesinger!?
Only movie worth recommend is My Dog Skip 👍⭐⭐⭐
Nice to see better quality.
Was this the first time Roeper guested?
Roeper might have been better off as a co-host on Entertainment Tonight. "A luuuuuudicrous courtroom drama."
Siskel and ebert r both dead but were still stuck with Roeper..... ughh
@musicman76enator
3 жыл бұрын
I like Roeper actually. I thought he was a good replacement for Siskel. Sure he's not perfect, but I think he's pretty accurate in his reviews. I enjoyed watching him discuss movies when the show became Ebert and Roeper and I also enjoyed reading his reviews in the Sun-Times. He made Ebert and Roeper fun to watch.
@crakatoot5480
3 жыл бұрын
@@musicman76enator i appreciate that Gene and Roger's chemistry would be impossible to recreate. I get that, but Roeper just agreed with roger WAY to much. the sparks never really flew
@musicman76enator
3 жыл бұрын
@@crakatoot5480 Well I think otherwise. IMO I think Roeper did not agree with Ebert way too much. Roeper also had a way of getting these "sparks" to fly. Check out some other of the later years reviews from say 2003 onwards and you will see what I mean.
Roeper just wasnt at the level of gene siskel
@Jbaxter85
3 жыл бұрын
No one's perfect
@DeanStrickson
3 жыл бұрын
There was only one Gene Siskel. He was irreplaceable.