قیصر احمد راجہ بھائی، ماشاءاللہ آپ جو تحقیقی کام کر رہے ہیں اس پر ہم آپ کو مبارک بھی دیتے ہیں اور اللہ کریم سے آپ کے لیے خصوصی دعا گو ہیں، کہ اللہ تعالی آپ کے علم میں، آپ کے عمل میں، آپ کے رزق میں، اپ کی صحت میں، خیر اور برکت عطا فرمائے، امین یا رب العالمین.

@sehrishnaveed8239

Ай бұрын

آمین یارب العالمین

@FarhatPasha-fy8pb

Ай бұрын

اللھم آمین

@0MuhammadIbrahim0

Ай бұрын

صرف دعائیں نہیں کرنی ہوتی۔ ہمارا مسئلہ ہی یہ ہے، کے جو بندہ علمی تحقیقی کام کرے ہم اس کی مدد کرنے بجائے پیچھے صوفی بن کے چوچے ہو کے بیٹھ جاتے ہیں کہ جی ہم فقیر آپ کے کیے دعائیں کر رہے ہیں باقی کام بس آپ ہی کریں۔ دنیا میں اگے بڑھیں سائنس سیکھیں اور عملی کام بھی کریں۔ کب تک مسجدوں میں بیٹھ کر صرف دعائیں ہی دینی ہے ہم نے؟ عملی کام بھی کرنا ہے یا نہیں؟

@zulfiqarmahmood8015

Ай бұрын

@@0MuhammadIbrahim0 آپ کو مسئلہ كیا ہے، جس کو یہ بھی نہیں پتہ کہ جس کے کمنٹس پر وہ کمنٹ کر رہا ہے، وہ اسے جانتا بھی ہے یا نہیں؟ یہ فلسفہ جھاڑنا ہے تو اپنا الگ سے میسج کر لو. کیا جانتے ہو میرے بارے میں، کہ میں کون ہوں، میری کیا تعلیم ہے. اتنا کم از کم پتہ ہونا چاہیے کہ جو چیز کوئی مسلمان دوسرے مسلمان کو فوری طور پر دے سکتا ہے اور جس کا کوئی نعم البدل نہیں ہے "وہ دعا ہے" جو کسی کے لیے دل سے نکلے. آپ سے تو وہ بھی نہیں ہو پایا، کہ آمین ہی کہہ دو.

@zulfiqarmahmood8015

Ай бұрын

@@0MuhammadIbrahim0 آپ کو مسئلہ كیا ہے، جس کو یہ بھی نہیں پتہ کہ جس کے کمنٹس پر وہ کمنٹ کر رہا ہے، وہ اسے جانتا بھی ہے یا نہیں؟ یہ فلسفہ جھاڑنا ہے تو اپنا الگ سے میسج کر لو. کیا جانتے ہو میرے بارے میں، کہ میں کون ہوں، میری کیا تعلیم ہے. اتنا کم از کم پتہ ہونا چاہیے کہ جو چیز کوئی مسلمان دوسرے مسلمان کو فوری طور پر دے سکتا ہے اور جس کا کوئی نعم البدل نہیں ہے "وہ دعا ہے" جو کسی کے لیے دل سے نکلے. آپ سے تو وہ بھی نہیں ہو پایا، کہ آمین ہی کہہ دو.

Qaiser bhai ko dil se salam MAshallah 💌💌💌

Qaisar Ahmed the great Raja❤❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉🎉

Bhai qaiser Bhai lagay raho, is daur Kay musalmaan app Kay Saath hain

@nchumbeni2011

25 күн бұрын

Is daur k nahi stone age ka musalman he is orthodox cancer ko support karega

Facts always wins against ad hominem keep it up QAR ❤🇵🇰💯

Allah pak apki hr trh hifazat fermay ❤Ameen

29:52 amazing reply🥰 to 29:14

جزاک اللّٰہ خیر قیصر بھائی ♥️

Great!

Allah o akbar ❤ Aj mehsoos ho rha hy k Allah pak ny Raja sb ki soorat mn Pakistan mn Apni ek Nishaaani bheji hy ... ❤😢

دیکھنا وہ قوم جس کی جہدوجہد بس آٹا خریدنے کی ہیں اب عبدالسلام کی دفاع کرے گی۔😂 کیا بات ہے 😂

Qasar Sahb Love you❤ Ignore comments. Ye inka Danda h. Pesy mil jaty h tu gar Atta le kr jaty hy.

@mirzasameer8666

Ай бұрын

Teri maa coment k pese deti ha?

قیصر بھائی اللہ آپ کا حامی و ناصر ہو۔ اللہ آپ کو صحت ایمان عطاء فرمائے

Great 👍

Qaiser Bhai Apne Jo Mic Liya Hai Woh Kiss Company Ka Hai. Mujhe Bhi Mic Lena Hai Kindly Please Bata Dein

@aadilansari5997

Ай бұрын

Mera Mic bhi Kiss Company ka hai. Aapko free main istemaal karna ko de dunga.

Mashallah jazakallah sir

ماشاء الله

اسلام علیکم qaisar Ahmad sahab please make video on Pakistani dramas thy target Islam i

@Khadim-Hussain-razvi

Ай бұрын

Aur aj kal ke dino Mein yai baut zyada barh gya hai

@ggff5307

Ай бұрын

Jani mujy pata b nhi k tv py dramy aty b hn ya nhi . Dakhty q ho ager wo ghalt kr rahy h

Excellent Qaiser Ahmed Bhai

Brilliant response

great Qaiser Ahmad raja

❤آپ پر سلامتی ہو

Salute to you sir...... Masalllah ap sy ajj boht kuch seekhny ko milla Btw what do you think of current education system specially university level system of Pakistan? Are they upto mark?

Qaiser Ahmad raja zindabad

Qaiser bhai ko dil se salam MAshallah

Qaisar shb too good 👌👌👌. Amazing work Qaisar shb. Please continue with this effort. Liberals and non Muslim qadianis are getting upset 😂😂

@Random_Human321

Ай бұрын

Brother pehlay video to POORI dekh leeya krro, annaywah comments na keeya krro pehlay poori BAAT sunna krro.

@ruhailkhan6081

Ай бұрын

Haha.....Video to dekh lo😂

@Random_Human321

Ай бұрын

​Yess per kindly yey laughing emoji mat daalo and Don't laugh also, issay YEY image jaata hai k mazaaq urhaaya jaa raha hai and u know, mazaaq Nahi urhaa​ chahiyay:)😊👍✌✌@@ruhailkhan6081

@Random_Human321

Ай бұрын

@@awaisasif1 mazaaq mat urhaao bro humain yey suit NAHI krna. Yehi baat aap BAGHAIR mazaaq urhayey kahaa krro:)

@asadahmed4993

Ай бұрын

​@@Random_Human321 brother looks like you have no sense. My comment is an appreciation to Qaisar shbs efforts in exposing Dr Abdus Salam. If this is hurting you then I don't care. Move on.

Nice

Raja saab,yaqeen krein this series is getting better and BETTER!❤

you are great sir, very detailed answer. i think they will not make another video.

Great ❤

راجہ دی گریٹ

Now I need so called *AQAL E KUL* ENGINEER SB response with details not just *molvio ka frontman gora ye gora WO....and I know I'm asking for too much😅

4:08 as a science student, I am extremely disappointed that Dr Rehman mixed two models. This is misleading, unacademic and frankly unacceptable from a particle physicist.

@verilyze

Ай бұрын

So he was talking about something else Man these scientist Makes the nuclear bomb then the seculars support them 😂

@ReciteQuran397

Ай бұрын

Science student ho ke is channel par qaisar raja ki bastian sun rahe ho jo science ko hi galat kehta hai . Afsos.

@hanannafees6219

Ай бұрын

​@@ReciteQuran397 You are just misguiding.

@hanannafees6219

Ай бұрын

​@@ReciteQuran397 You are just misguiding.

It is impressive to listen these kind of technical research, plz continue these type of things...

❤

Qaiser bhai , ❤❤❤❤❤❤

👍

Masha-ALLAH Qaisar sahab ❤

Qaiser "Great" Raja!

Weldone Qaiser sb, I really appreciate your work. May Allah SWT increase your knowledge 🙏. Keep exposing Qadyani & Atheists and secret Qadyani & secret Atheists.

@zubairkhan0001

Ай бұрын

I have seen such comments somewhere else😂😂😂

Good debate.

Mashaallah bohot acha response qaiser bhai ki taraf hy

Incredible sir. May allah help you in your cause ❤

I'm wondering... How much it's takes to get to that level

Very nice response

Love you, Qaiser bhai!

شکریہ جناب۔ اس ویڈیو میں آواز کافی بہتر تھی 👍

sir I am always fascinated by the level pf your researching please explain how you resewrch on different topics

وَعَلَيْكُم السَّلَام وَرَحْمَةُ اَللهِ وَبَرَكاتُهُ

ڈاکٹر عبدالسلام سے محبت کرنے والوں کو اللہ قیامت کے دن ان کا ساتھی بنا کر محشر میں کھڑا کرے۔ آمین

@regroupar5016

Ай бұрын

na unsa muhabat na lena dena bs apki chawlain hain

@asadahmed4993

Ай бұрын

آمین

@muhaq755

Ай бұрын

اسے گلیشو۔ وائن برگ ۔ سلام تھیوری کا نام دیا جانا ثابت کر رہا ہے کہ ان تینوں کی کنٹریبیوشن اس میں شامل ہے۔ قیصر راجہ صاحب کی ساری ویڈیوز کا جائزہ لیا جائے تو صاف پتہ چل جاتا ہے کہ موصوف مذھبی تنگ نظری میں بری طرح مبتلا ھیں۔اس لئے ان کے خیالات اور آراء متوازن اور منصفانہ نہیں ھیں۔ اللہ ہی ھے جو انہیں ان کے کجرو خیالات کی دلدل سے نکال سکتا ھے،کوئی اور انہیں انکے نفس کے دھوکوں سے نکال نہیں سکتا۔

@AbdulQadeer-hv9ms

Ай бұрын

Hum unke sath honge physics seekhenge😂

send this video to engineer someone pleazz and open his eyes cuz he lives in the world of firqa and baba

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

Best Responded❤

Very well Qaiser Bhai

Excellent sir

❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤

Social media influencers are now preaching about particle physics. What a strange time we're living in. Your video is a pathetic excuse of a response. Beating about the bush, instead of accepting that you have been humbled on all accounts.

@UniqueTalesofficials

Ай бұрын

Bhai koi logical jawab do...frustration na dikhao

@user-yh1qd7lj5f

21 күн бұрын

@@UniqueTalesofficials bahi tum librandus sy logical baat ki umeed rakhty ho? ye to apki apni ghalti hy

Usually first page of research paper has only abstract of research. I think Dr tainoor haven't written any research paper yet.

❤❤❤

🥰😍

Keep it up Qaiser sahab! ❤

Behtreen ho gya Qaiser bhai ❤

Glashow advanced the idea that the electromagnetic and weak interactions may be unified in a gauge theory based on the group SU(2) × U(1). The problem of generating masses in a manner consistent with gauge invariance was solved later by Weinberg and Salam, using the idea of spontaneous symmetry breaking'.

@verilyze

Ай бұрын

Iska use batao kya use hai uska Matlab kis cheez ke kaam aata hai aur has it been unproven or modified

@muhaq755

Ай бұрын

اسے گلیشو۔ وائن برگ ۔ سلام تھیوری کا نام دیا جانا ثابت کر رہا ہے کہ ان تینوں کی کنٹریبیوشن اس میں شامل ہے۔ قیصر راجہ صاحب کی ساری ویڈیوز کا جائزہ لیا جائے تو صاف پتہ چل جاتا ہے کہ موصوف مذھبی تنگ نظری میں بری طرح مبتلا ھیں۔اس لئے ان کے خیالات اور آراء متوازن اور منصفانہ نہیں ھیں۔ اللہ ہی ھے جو انہیں ان کے کجرو خیالات کی دلدل سے نکال سکتا ھے،کوئی اور انہیں انکے نفس کے دھوکوں سے نکال نہیں سکتا۔

My concern is with the person Sheldon Glashow . He is now 91, when he was interviewed by AIP/APS he was 89, why did the erudite man wait for six decades ( 58 years to be precise) to spill the beans on A Salam . He waited for a simple reason that he intended to whistle blow post the deaths of both A Salam (1996) and S Weinberg ( 2021). viz when there was none of the three NL alive , barring Sheldon himself. Way to go. You conveniently latched on to the narrative because you have your own ax to grind. Please listen to Dr Pervez Hoodbhoy 2 hours program @ Black Hole in order to pries open your closed mind an apostate that you are!!

@UsmanGhani-mm8dg

Ай бұрын

You're telling the truth to a clump of gullible fanatics. They will never understand or come near reasoning.

The only outstanding thing I learn from your videos is , how to stay calm and compose the logic to give cold befitting rebuttal .........

Someone please answer me who was the person(child) blocked by Dr.Taimur Lal😅

MashaAllah ❤️❤️❤️ Allah Pak Lambi Umar Ata Farmaye ❣️❣️❣️ Allah Pak Ahl e Sunnat Ko Salamat Rakhy ❤️❤️❤️ ALHAMDULILLAHH, WE ARE SUNNI HANFI BRELVI 💕💕💕

O weak ago i listened your name now IAM listening to you

Bahteen

Mashallah

Check out the video (part 2) by @Dr.RehmanAmir on this topic to build a rational view.

Bhai dr Rehman khud ke credibility ko karap kar rahe hai baseless reasoning de ker. Ye science hai aur koi bhi galat ho sakta hai. Zabardasti miss information ke saat kisiko defend karne ki jarurat kya paad gayi!!!

mashAllah keep it up

Abdus Salam Qadiani nay apnay Nabi ki terha Zilli Buruzi research ki aur Metaphorically Electroweak model per equation ko prove kia. Qadianion ko metaphor buhat pasand hay.

@verilyze

Ай бұрын

Bhai agar kar bhi le do kya muslim country mei qadiani ko kyu rights mile Huh baat khatam Aisa waisa kaafir nahi yeh log They are pretending to be

❤❤❤❤❤

Great analysis sir ❤❤❤

Love you so much sir ❤️❤️❤️

❤❤

I wish these two thinkers were discussing the idea of grand unification theory, instead of who did what in the past... Nevertheless... A fresh departure from the stagnant discussions we are in currently...

@verilyze

Ай бұрын

Science is not thinking Its more as observation and documentation And disparity between writer of those observation or theories that attempt this so and yes it's important now the facts and truth are out the window because you don't like it or even want it to be challanged is he abbus salam a idol of Greece Thinking is different it's far simpler and far more important

Sahab standard model incorporates electro weak theory...its a bigger picture...please logo ko misguide na karo yr qaiser ...khuda ka khoof kr yr

جزاک اللّٰہ قیصر بھائی۔ آپ کا کام اور سچائی سامنے لانا پاکستان اور مسلمانوں کے لیے بُہت اہم ہے اور پاکستان کو آپ جیسے مخلص لوگوں کی شدید ضرورت ہے ♥️

Next year sy Nobel Prize ka announcement Raja saab Kiya krain gain 😂

🔴

paul dirac nai 1956 mein 3 spin 1 fields sai unification karny ki koshih ki thi py paper likha tha....Morever,In 1964 paper triplet structure was also introduced in 1953 by gell mann's eightfold way which also used triplet structure for su3 symmetry...so salam only integrated it into electroweak unifictaion...so his work was only extension of group theory and triplet structure except this all were so called independently propsed ideas of salam that can be subjected to plagiarism....also he integrated newly formed higgs mechnism (1964)....with few changes he tried to prove he reached conclusion independently

i don't know much about dr abdus salam. Can anyone tell me was he a Muslim

@huzaifashaheer724

Ай бұрын

His religion is not a topic here.

@asadahmed4993

Ай бұрын

He was not a Muslim and also a fake scientist. He used to copy other's work. Qaiser shb proves the same in this series. Great effort by Qaisar shb. Also Pakistani people have disowned him due to his hatred towards Islam.

@zeeahmad7449

Ай бұрын

He was Ahmadi Muslim

@singalongme1

Ай бұрын

@@zeeahmad7449 Ahmadi and Muslim is oxymoron

@huzaifashaheer724

Ай бұрын

@@zeeahmad7449 Qadianis are not muslim.

29:14 epic reply raja sb 🔥

Qaiser sahb pora paper google scholar & research gate pr mojood h...esqadr jhalat se qam na le....or kitna mazaq banwaengy....Dr taimoor n baraha kaha 1968...baccho waly batein mt karien ...qibla🙏🙏🙏

Raja sahib Salam model ko aaj standard model hi kaha jata he, tasheeh karle aap.

Mashaullah jitna waqt Abdus saalm marho ne nobel inaam hasil karne per lagaya tha hum musalamnon ka inshaullah us se hazaron guna zyada waqt usko ghalat aur plagiarist sabit karne mai lag jaye ga. Magar hum rasoolullah saw k namoos ki hifazat mai apna tan man dhan aur qeemati waqt sab qurban kar dain gai.

long story short. lets ask ChatGPT the following three questions 1. can you provide a summary of salam paper on electroweak theory of 1958, glashow paper 1961, salam paper 1964 and weinberg paper 1967 2. what if we remove the work of salam 1964 3. was the salam paper 1964 is copy of glashow paper 1961?

@UniqueTalesofficials

Ай бұрын

What is chat gpt answer

@sameernasir1484

Ай бұрын

@@UniqueTalesofficials can you provide a summary of salam paper on electroweak theory of 1958, glashow paper 1961, salam paper 1964 and weinberg paper 1967? ChatGPT Sure, let's break down the key points of each paper: Abdus Salam's 1958 Paper on Electroweak Theory: Salam's 1958 paper laid the groundwork for the electroweak theory, unifying the electromagnetic and weak nuclear forces. He proposed a theory that described both forces as different aspects of a single unified force. Salam introduced the concept of spontaneously broken symmetry, which became a central idea in the electroweak theory. Sheldon Glashow's 1961 Paper: Glashow's 1961 paper built upon Salam's work, further developing the electroweak theory. He introduced the idea of a unified electroweak force that combined electromagnetism with the weak nuclear force. Glashow's paper also incorporated the Higgs mechanism, which gives particles mass through interactions with a field known as the Higgs field. Abdus Salam's 1964 Paper: Salam's 1964 paper, along with contributions from Steven Weinberg, further refined the electroweak theory. They proposed a gauge theory of the weak and electromagnetic interactions, based on the SU(2) × U(1) symmetry group. This paper provided the mathematical framework for the electroweak theory and predicted the existence of the W and Z bosons, which were later discovered experimentally. Steven Weinberg's 1967 Paper: Weinberg's 1967 paper, often referred to as the "Weinberg-Salam model," completed the electroweak theory. He, along with Salam, showed how the electromagnetic and weak forces could be unified within a single theory. Weinberg's paper provided a unified explanation for the weak nuclear force and electromagnetism, successfully predicting the masses of the W and Z bosons and the existence of the Higgs boson. These papers collectively formed the basis of the electroweak theory, which is now an essential component of the Standard Model of particle physics. They laid the groundwork for understanding the fundamental forces of nature at the subatomic level. You: what if we remove the work of salam 1964? ChatGPT: Removing Salam's 1964 paper would have significant implications for the development of the electroweak theory: Delayed Unification: Without Salam's paper, the unification of the weak nuclear force with electromagnetism might have been delayed. His work provided the mathematical framework necessary for understanding the electroweak theory. Missing Predictions: Salam's paper predicted the existence of the W and Z bosons, which were later discovered experimentally. Without this prediction, experimentalists might have faced challenges in identifying these particles, potentially delaying their discovery. Incomplete Theory: The absence of Salam's contributions would leave a gap in the understanding of the electroweak interaction. His paper, along with Weinberg's, provided a comprehensive theoretical framework for the unification of forces. Impact on Standard Model: The Standard Model of particle physics, which incorporates the electroweak theory, would likely have been significantly different or delayed in its development without Salam's contributions. Overall, removing Salam's 1964 paper would have slowed down the progress in understanding the unification of fundamental forces, particularly electromagnetism and the weak nuclear force. It would have hindered the development of the Standard Model and our understanding of particle physics. You: what if we remove the work of salam 1964 ChatGPT: If Salam's 1964 paper were removed from the timeline of particle physics development, several significant consequences would arise: Delay in Electroweak Unification: Salam's paper was pivotal in unifying the weak nuclear force with electromagnetism. Without it, the timeline for achieving this unification would have been delayed, potentially by several years or even decades. Missing Predictions and Experimental Guidance: Salam's paper predicted the existence of the W and Z bosons, essential carriers of the weak force, which were later experimentally confirmed. Without these predictions, experimental physicists might have faced challenges in understanding and identifying these particles. Incomplete Theoretical Framework: Salam's work provided a crucial mathematical framework for understanding the electroweak theory. Without his contributions, physicists would have had to rely on alternative, possibly less elegant or less accurate, approaches to describe the weak force and its interactions with electromagnetism. Altered Collaborations and Discoveries: The collaboration between Salam and Weinberg was instrumental in refining the electroweak theory. Without Salam's paper, the dynamics of this collaboration might have been different, potentially impacting the subsequent discoveries and developments in particle physics. Shift in Research Focus: The absence of Salam's 1964 paper could have led to shifts in research priorities within the field of particle physics. Physicists might have focused on alternative theories or approaches to understanding the weak force, potentially leading to different experimental outcomes and theoretical developments. Overall, removing Salam's 1964 paper would have slowed down the progress of particle physics, delayed the unification of fundamental forces, and potentially altered the trajectory of research in the field. You: was the salam paper 1964 is copy of glashow paper 1961? ChatGPT: No, Salam's 1964 paper was not a copy of Glashow's 1961 paper. While both papers contributed to the development of the electroweak theory, they approached the subject from different angles and made distinct contributions. Glashow's 1961 Paper: Glashow's paper introduced the idea of a unified electroweak force combining electromagnetism with the weak nuclear force. He incorporated the concept of a unified gauge theory, which laid the groundwork for later developments in the field. Salam's 1964 Paper: Salam's paper, along with contributions from Weinberg, further refined the electroweak theory. They proposed a specific gauge theory of the weak and electromagnetic interactions, based on the SU(2) × U(1) symmetry group. Salam's paper also predicted the existence of the W and Z bosons, which were later experimentally confirmed. While both Glashow and Salam contributed to the development of the electroweak theory, their papers were distinct in terms of their theoretical frameworks, mathematical formalism, and specific predictions.

@sameernasir1484

Ай бұрын

@@UniqueTalesofficials can you provide a summary of salam paper on electroweak theory of 1958, glashow paper 1961, salam paper 1964 and weinberg paper 1967 ChatGPT ChatGPT Sure, let's break down the key points of each paper: Abdus Salam's 1958 Paper on Electroweak Theory: Salam's 1958 paper laid the groundwork for the electroweak theory, unifying the electromagnetic and weak nuclear forces. He proposed a theory that described both forces as different aspects of a single unified force. Salam introduced the concept of spontaneously broken symmetry, which became a central idea in the electroweak theory. Sheldon Glashow's 1961 Paper: Glashow's 1961 paper built upon Salam's work, further developing the electroweak theory. He introduced the idea of a unified electroweak force that combined electromagnetism with the weak nuclear force. Glashow's paper also incorporated the Higgs mechanism, which gives particles mass through interactions with a field known as the Higgs field. Abdus Salam's 1964 Paper: Salam's 1964 paper, along with contributions from Steven Weinberg, further refined the electroweak theory. They proposed a gauge theory of the weak and electromagnetic interactions, based on the SU(2) × U(1) symmetry group. This paper provided the mathematical framework for the electroweak theory and predicted the existence of the W and Z bosons, which were later discovered experimentally. Steven Weinberg's 1967 Paper: Weinberg's 1967 paper, often referred to as the "Weinberg-Salam model," completed the electroweak theory. He, along with Salam, showed how the electromagnetic and weak forces could be unified within a single theory. Weinberg's paper provided a unified explanation for the weak nuclear force and electromagnetism, successfully predicting the masses of the W and Z bosons and the existence of the Higgs boson. These papers collectively formed the basis of the electroweak theory, which is now an essential component of the Standard Model of particle physics. They laid the groundwork for understanding the fundamental forces of nature at the subatomic level. You what if we remove the work of salam 1964 ChatGPT ChatGPT Removing Salam's 1964 paper would have significant implications for the development of the electroweak theory: Delayed Unification: Without Salam's paper, the unification of the weak nuclear force with electromagnetism might have been delayed. His work provided the mathematical framework necessary for understanding the electroweak theory. Missing Predictions: Salam's paper predicted the existence of the W and Z bosons, which were later discovered experimentally. Without this prediction, experimentalists might have faced challenges in identifying these particles, potentially delaying their discovery. Incomplete Theory: The absence of Salam's contributions would leave a gap in the understanding of the electroweak interaction. His paper, along with Weinberg's, provided a comprehensive theoretical framework for the unification of forces. Impact on Standard Model: The Standard Model of particle physics, which incorporates the electroweak theory, would likely have been significantly different or delayed in its development without Salam's contributions. Overall, removing Salam's 1964 paper would have slowed down the progress in understanding the unification of fundamental forces, particularly electromagnetism and the weak nuclear force. It would have hindered the development of the Standard Model and our understanding of particle physics. You what if we remove the work of salam 1964 ChatGPT ChatGPT If Salam's 1964 paper were removed from the timeline of particle physics development, several significant consequences would arise: Delay in Electroweak Unification: Salam's paper was pivotal in unifying the weak nuclear force with electromagnetism. Without it, the timeline for achieving this unification would have been delayed, potentially by several years or even decades. Missing Predictions and Experimental Guidance: Salam's paper predicted the existence of the W and Z bosons, essential carriers of the weak force, which were later experimentally confirmed. Without these predictions, experimental physicists might have faced challenges in understanding and identifying these particles. Incomplete Theoretical Framework: Salam's work provided a crucial mathematical framework for understanding the electroweak theory. Without his contributions, physicists would have had to rely on alternative, possibly less elegant or less accurate, approaches to describe the weak force and its interactions with electromagnetism. Altered Collaborations and Discoveries: The collaboration between Salam and Weinberg was instrumental in refining the electroweak theory. Without Salam's paper, the dynamics of this collaboration might have been different, potentially impacting the subsequent discoveries and developments in particle physics. Shift in Research Focus: The absence of Salam's 1964 paper could have led to shifts in research priorities within the field of particle physics. Physicists might have focused on alternative theories or approaches to understanding the weak force, potentially leading to different experimental outcomes and theoretical developments. Overall, removing Salam's 1964 paper would have slowed down the progress of particle physics, delayed the unification of fundamental forces, and potentially altered the trajectory of research in the field. You was the salam paper 1964 is copy of glashow paper 1961 ChatGPT ChatGPT No, Salam's 1964 paper was not a copy of Glashow's 1961 paper. While both papers contributed to the development of the electroweak theory, they approached the subject from different angles and made distinct contributions. Glashow's 1961 Paper: Glashow's paper introduced the idea of a unified electroweak force combining electromagnetism with the weak nuclear force. He incorporated the concept of a unified gauge theory, which laid the groundwork for later developments in the field. Salam's 1964 Paper: Salam's paper, along with contributions from Weinberg, further refined the electroweak theory. They proposed a specific gauge theory of the weak and electromagnetic interactions, based on the SU(2) × U(1) symmetry group. Salam's paper also predicted the existence of the W and Z bosons, which were later experimentally confirmed. While both Glashow and Salam contributed to the development of the electroweak theory, their papers were distinct in terms of their theoretical frameworks, mathematical formalism, and specific predictions.

@sameernasir1484

Ай бұрын

@@UniqueTalesofficials the reply is long and can not be pasted here. you can try it urself. the overall conclusion is that salams 1964 work was genuine and plays a major role in construction of whole model

@subhanallah6

Ай бұрын

To chat gpt kia Farishty control krty han? Jo forces Nobel da skti han wo information ko b control kr skti han or kai bat hua ha k chat gpt na ghalat informauton di ha ma an khud ye dakha ha

A next nobel prize to Raja Sahb 🎉🎉🎉

@11114striker

Ай бұрын

Raja apni G ka b zoor laga lay tub b nobel nahi mil sakta usay

@UniqueTalesofficials

Ай бұрын

​@@11114strikerAap ki language se pta chal raha hai frustration ka

@11114striker

Ай бұрын

@@UniqueTalesofficials baat sachi hai. Is netherlands k tootay ko kabhi nobel nahi mil sakta. Yahan video bananay ki bijayey yea pakistan physical association ko letter q nahi likhta. Q k is ko pata hai k is ki baaton mai koi dum nahi. Yea zia ki baqiyat hai. Ya yea nobel association ko letter likhay k aap sae ghalti hogaye. Is ka kaam video bana kar paisay kamana hai. Sub paisay ka chakkar hai babu bhaiya

@UniqueTalesofficials

Ай бұрын

@@11114striker meri jaan phir frustration... Mujhe kisi k noble prize se Lena dena bhi...bat ye hai k Jo usne sawal uthae hain AGR bilkul ghair janibdaar ho kr dekho to uska jawab koi bhi de SK raha..frustration nikal rahe hain sb

@UniqueTalesofficials

Ай бұрын

Or noble prize wapis bhi hota even k ghalat bhi ho

Assalamualaikum kya haal he aap sabke😊😊😊

@rohail_aziz

Ай бұрын

و علیکم السلام، میں بالکل خیریت سے ہوں الحمدللہ، آپ اپنا سنائیے۔

Hazur glashow n starting point diya tha jbke salam sahb n usko mathematical frame work diya or complete kiya (U1 ) gage ke madad se .... kindly bonge mt maree

Sir, with due respect. If your arguments are actually valid, then you should report to the Nobel Prize committee. It's pretty convenient to create a KZread video, and throw whatever arguments you want. The Nobel Prize in Science is no joke. It's one of the most competitive prizes in Science. Saying that it accepted a plagiarized work, and in so many years not a single distinguished Physics researcher reported this to the Nobel Prize Committee is pretty unbelievable. And honestly, I have gone through all your arguments, and also the rebuttals. In my opinion, you clearly don't understand science at all. How research happens in academia. Please never throw any information on to the audience if you don't have complete knowledge about it. You'll only spread mis conception among your audience. I used to listen to you and considered you a genuine person. But these couple of videos have shown me that you're a red flag for me for any Islamic Information. You might have done great work, but spreading such misconception will certainly zero your rewards in front of Allah.

@muhammadsalman1036

Ай бұрын

Bughaz aur science Aik dimagh Aik saath nai reh saktay

Also respond to hoodbhoy video supporting salam

QAiser BHAIII❤❤❤❤

Koi bataye ga k Ali bhai kahan hain is mamlay main unho nay q chup saadi hoi . He is the perfect man to respond to that issue. Kahen amany dehriyay viewers guwanay ka khatra to nahi ha unhain

@UniqueTalesofficials

Ай бұрын

Engineer Sab already responded but WO logical baat nhi kr sake...WO QAR ko molvio ka agent kehte hain PR logical jawab nhi dete. Engineer Sab sirf molvio k aage sher hain

What all this to achieve why waste time on such mundane issue!

@CatGirl635

Ай бұрын

Qadyanio sy nafrat.

Ab yai series " KOUN JEETAY GA" ki taraf Jaa Rahi hai.😂 Who scores how many goals

Free palestine allah ho akbar