:)

@constitutionalchaffee

18 күн бұрын

The most ultra based person ever 🫡🫡

@Johnnysmithy24

15 күн бұрын

@@constitutionalchaffee Indeed

Probably one of the best speeches he has given. Definitely giving "main character speech" vibes

Great talk. Thank you Dr.

Not all heros wear capes. Some wear business casual with Adidas Sambas. ❤ya Jim!

I disagree with James. I think that this was his best talk ever! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

@sirellyn

21 күн бұрын

What way do you disagree with him?

How does this only have 340something views (as of now)?! It’s Dr. James Flipping Lindsay! Excellent talk, both on woke Marxism and Leadership 👌🏻

@XxDanielaxX

25 күн бұрын

James Lindsay recently is getting some push back for not acknowledging that his explanations do not account for what the modern far left is actually doing. He's right with a lot of stuff when it comes to the far left like decades or even centuries ago. Unfortunately, he's being stuck with it due to maybe some pride? Or stubborness? I don't know. 🤷🏻‍♀️ The modern far left is back to the all-anti-capitalism mode, yet James doesn't want that to be true. (Seemingly. 🤷🏻‍♀️)

@frankrizzo8117

25 күн бұрын

@@XxDanielaxX He says the are trying to dismantle Capitalism all the time. He was saying this 2 years before Karlyn was. She is stuck 2 years behind as she admitted she had not listened to James in 2 years. She is missing Marx's manuscripts, dosent understand how Hagel factors into them and only recently discovered Paulo Friere a Henry Giroux which James covered 2 years ago. Karlyn is losing her mind because she is has an incomplete picture. James has covered where they are going in education. This is why Dr. K is melting down. When she started her The Cult series I listened to many Socialism Saturdays, Sophie Lewis videos, and sniping streams. Karlyn released a video about quiting because she didn't have enough subs. I was a paid sub and listened to both her and James.

This spoken word is better than he says. A fine speech.🐿

@Knuck_Knucks

28 күн бұрын

"Just say no."🐿

Great talk. Thanks for posting

I lived in San Francisco when The Peoples Temple was happening. The liberal leaders of SF embraced Jones and he was given civic political positions by the city and state political leaders. These all turned on Jones when rumors and accusations of violence and sexual predation emerged from the Temple. Jones then went to Guyana with his congregation . The rest of the story is well documented.

An old tactic--find and turn to your uses those who think they have been prevented from winning: Saruman: The horsemen took your lands. They drove your people into the hills, to scratch a living off rocks! Wildman Chieftain: Murderers! [the wildmen yell] Saruman: Take back the lands they stole from you. Burn every village!

I learned about communism in the 1990s in my high school. We read One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, as well as learning about it in history class. We read Pearl S. Buck's The Good Earth, too.

@Freerunx3

11 күн бұрын

where did you live?

@emilymiller1792

11 күн бұрын

@@Freerunx3 I grew up in the Midwest of the United States.

@gregsmith7949

Күн бұрын

I took World History as a Senior in High School (1987), and the last 6 weeks, we studied communism. We even had a textbook with a large hammer and sickle on the cover.

Woke is easy to speak. Reverse everything they say and you'll understand their exact intent and meaning.

⚔️⚔️⚔️⚔️⚔️

James, the doctrinaire nature of wokies is like Bertrand Russells observation on Lenin after his conversation with him:- "I was less impressed by Lenin than I expected to be...absolute orthodoxy. He thought a proposition could be proved by quoting a text in Marx. He was quite incapable of supposing that there could be anything in Marx that wasn't right. That struck me as rather limited." kzread.info/dash/bejne/aIh_m8Vmk8Srk9o.html Woke is a religion, complete with its own millenarian orthodoxy. It must be stopped with the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

@jamesbeach7405

16 күн бұрын

Using the establishment clause would solve so many things. The issue is how to clearly show that it meets the criteria when they have no gods or prophets and no churches or temples. I'd love to see it done.

@tim2muntu954

16 күн бұрын

Gods, prophets, churches or temples are appurtenances of religion, (Buddhism, the 4th largest religion on Earth is without Gods), the core is a system of beliefs and worship. (what is BLM taking the knee but ritualised worship?). Atheism, secular neutrality, post-modernism are all systems of thought based on beliefs that, like ALL beliefs, and like mathematical axioms, cannot be proved, but must be assumed (believed). Bertrand Russell, in tandem with Alfred North Whitehead wrote the Principia Mathematica in a vain attempt to disprove this fact, and Russell said, failed, and the attempt broke him.

@jamesbeach7405

16 күн бұрын

@tim2muntu954 well put. I'm in full agreement that Marxism qualifies as a religion... I guess my point was, can the supreme court be convinced? Perhaps more importantly van the citizenry overall be convinced?

@tim2muntu954

16 күн бұрын

Let's hope so. Charles MacKay said in 1841, in "Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds", “Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, one by one.” Fortunately, the internet has turbocharged that process, and is infinitely faster than the samizdat that undermined the Soviets.

The Parable of the Talents, that Jesus told His disciples, encourages every Christian to spend their Spiritual Gift, talents, and money, time, and energy, to spread TRUTH, in His NAME. “Shine the LIGHT”, and speak with “SALT” to PRESERVE LIFE….yours, your family’s, your neighbor’s, your church’s, your place where you work, vote for those who are AWARE of these unhealthy teachings that could actually lead to the DEATH OF HUMANITY, but REALIZE THAT WE HAVE A SERIOUS PROBLEM, in EVERY COUNTRY on EARTH, at this time. AND IT WILL NOT JUST “GO AWAY”. We must help each other to KNOW THE TRUTH, and FIGURE OUT WHAT “I” CAN DO.

The story about Jesus telling His disciples how to spread the Truth (of the Gospel), is in Matthew 10:1-16, and the Parable of the Talents is in Matthew 25:14-30. Our Christian “Spiritual Battle” is to SPEAK and LIVE THE TRUTH, and when consider WHAT TRUTH IS, remember that Romans 1 says that TRUTH has been made EVIDENT to EVERYONE, as well as the very WORDS OF GOD, in your BIBLE. Also, The ENEMY LIES, and THAT IS HIS POWER. SO, CHRIST GIVES US THE TRUTH to FACE HIM DOWN, JUST LIKE JESUS DID DURING HIS TEMPTATIONS, IN THE DESERT…..LEARN FROM HIM.

Erm. Why has my comment been deleted..?

@constitutionalchaffee

24 күн бұрын

Not sure, I didn’t delete anything. I love the chaos 🤣

@symmetricat188

23 күн бұрын

@@constitutionalchaffee You're "not sure you didn't delete anything"..? What?

@constitutionalchaffee

23 күн бұрын

@@symmetricat188I added a comma. I’m sure you could have understood what I meant if you passed 5th grade.

Marxism is not an economic theory. Marxism is a religion. Yeah, James is entitled to his opinion as we all are. While in reality the influencial activists talk about it all the time how badly they want to abolish the evil system of capitalism (= a system of private property ownership and individual rights).

@symmetricat188

25 күн бұрын

Yet here you are, correctly describing the idea being:"to abolish the evil system of capitalism". EVIL system. As in "Good vs. Evil". Defining & redifining "Good & Evil" means to assume authority over all matters of morality & thus, ethics. Which is a religious claim. Moreover, Marx derives the need for the "abolition of private property" from his understanding of human nature. He is, of course, wrong, yet the claim is fundamental. His theory is not one of economics, but that of "man's true nature". Yep, sounds like religion. Problem is: today's Neo-Marxists have never actually read Marx.

@ashleynicole9423

24 күн бұрын

Yeah but they don’t use capitalism to mean the same thing you mean it as. Capitalism is the bourgeois, the middle class, whiteness.

@maryg2915

23 күн бұрын

They define private property ownership as parental rights, land ownership, individual liberties, and intellectual property. Anyone who wants to learn more about this should listen to Karlyn B.

@XxDanielaxX

23 күн бұрын

@@ashleynicole9423 Capitalism is defined as private property ownership. Not as the bourgeois, the white, the middleclass. And private property to them is your house, your land, property you rent out, your business, your intellectual property, your parental richts over your children and your individual liberties.

@XxDanielaxX

23 күн бұрын

@@maryg2915 Great additional info. 👍🏻 That is exactly where the proper knowledge is waiting for you. And it's free to access on her youtube channel.

I’ve learned a lot from James over the years, but some of this speech is directly stolen from Dr Karlyn Borysenko. Also, as a Christian I’m very bothered by an atheist taking Scripture out of context to placate to his Christian audience.

@retbeart

22 күн бұрын

Mary G, you’re really pushing Karlyn. You her sock puppet acct? If you are, a suggestion-run your voice through something that reduces the glare. I’m wincing within the first two minutes of your videos. Can’t finish any of them.

@maryg2915

22 күн бұрын

@@retbeart No I’m not a sock. Just someone who wants people to learn more about communism so we can effectively combat it. I’m also praying that both Karlyn and James are someday changed by the truth of the Gospel. ❤️😊

@ridindirtyface

20 күн бұрын

For James being an atheist I think he does a great job of using religious allegory to to convey his points, rather than discrediting faith all together.

@gregsmith7949

Күн бұрын

Anything that brings James closer to Christ is fine with me. He may not believe it, but he could eventually have his revelation on the road to Damascus.

I wish there were a Christian out there who could effectively tackle this topic. Instead, we are left with James, who takes scripture out of context and says Christiany things when he speaks in churches. Or you can listen to Karlyn, who is very clear about not being a Christian and is hostile to the Gospel, but at least she is honest and understands the material better than James.

@nancid5265

20 күн бұрын

Are you kidding scripture is interpreted their own way in every Church since Christ left the Earth. Who has the authority to interpret the meaning of a scripture for other people. Amos 3:7

@disciplesuniversity3945

2 күн бұрын

Hermetically careful study

@maryg2915

2 күн бұрын

@@disciplesuniversity3945 in reference to James L or to the broader topic at hand?

"Thought Leader" is a terrible term. The rest of us aren't thought sheep or thought followers. James Lindsay is a public intellectual, an academic.

But how can people be SO stupid to believe ANY of this nonsense? I don’t get it!

@ashleynicole9423

24 күн бұрын

Struggle sessions. They’re essentially bullied into believing it, by those closest to them. Or by those who they make their living from. And sadly they had no sincerely held beliefs before to compare it to.

Stalin said something once "People have right,to be idiots,but some abuse and strech that privileg" This guy is one of them.

@crocodilegrundee4514

14 күн бұрын

lol, what an idiotic comment!

Nice epic fail, Lindsay! Marx did not say one of the most famous lines in all of literature, “Better to rule in hell, than to serve in heaven.” like YOU claim. EVERYONE knows that classic line was first spoken by Capt. James T. Kirk after he sentenced Khan Noonian Singh to exile on Ceti Alpha V in Star Trek:TOS, S1 E22, Space Seed. 🙄

God he’s out of shape 😢

The grift is obviously paying the grocery bills.

@CraftyMiscreant

21 күн бұрын

What makes it a grift?

@LiveAndLetLive2024

20 күн бұрын

​@@CraftyMiscreantHe mischaracterizes what "the left" is actually saying, which prevents the real problems from facing real backlash.

@jennapecor1865

14 күн бұрын

@@LiveAndLetLive2024what specifically is he mischaracterizing

@mrginge143

11 күн бұрын

⁠@@LiveAndLetLive2024you ever heard of the motte and bailey? It’s where you use words with an attacking activist definition and a defensive moral position and you blur the lines constantly over which definition you are using in the instance.

@concilium1

11 күн бұрын

No, he’s reading the literature and repeating it.

goofy ahh controlled opposition