Ah yes, Saturdays are not complete without a good helping of knowledge from our friend Sabine

@rog2224

3 жыл бұрын

And this one has a cliffhanger.

@paulotorres558

3 жыл бұрын

Confirmed !!

@beachbum77979

3 жыл бұрын

And without the gobbledygook!

@KibyNykraft

3 жыл бұрын

@@beachbum77979 The whole idea of dimensionS of emptiness sounds pretty much like gobbeldygook to me.

@KibyNykraft

3 жыл бұрын

Unknown "dark"particles is of course another and more plausible question. At least. And there is no way of cheating out of special relativity and the continuous variable motion of all that exists *in* space. :)

I can't get over the quality of these videos. Everytime I watch, I get filled with boundless excitement and motivation. Next week can't come soon enough!

@ideliversoftontario4976

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, she is a gifted teacher and a beautiful mind.

@hans-joachimbierwirth4727

3 жыл бұрын

It's the lowest you can find in the physics department. Loads of bullshit.

@emmanueloluga9770

3 жыл бұрын

@@hans-joachimbierwirth4727 what do you mean?

@frankdimeglio8216

2 жыл бұрын

@@hans-joachimbierwirth4727 You have to CLEARLY AND fully understand what E=mc2 means and represents ON BALANCE. We want to understand the dimensions in a seamless (or balanced) fashion in relation to gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy (including what is E=mc2). Consider one AND three dimensional SPACE ON BALANCE. Consider what is the fourth dimension ON BALANCE. NOW, consider all of the following. Consider what is E=mc2. CLEARLY, you have to understand what is a TWO dimensional surface OR SPACE ON BALANCE. c squared CLEARLY represents BALANCED acceleration in conjunction WITH what is NECESSARILY a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE, AND consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE. This CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. Carefully consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. Great. Consider what is gravity AND E=mc2 ON BALANCE. By Frank DiMeglio

I just loved it when Sabine starts quoting Dr. Kaluza in the original German (7:33). Certainly woke me up! LOL

@matheuscarbonero8186

3 жыл бұрын

It's so funny, she's speaking English in her own pace and then, out of nowhere, she just starts speaking crazily fast hahahahhaha it made me realize I wasn't paying enough attention

@finanzkrise

3 жыл бұрын

I have not noticed any difference in speed :o Im German tho

@homeape.

2 жыл бұрын

her german isnt really faster than her english

@thorr18BEM

2 жыл бұрын

I count 6 seconds for the German version and 7 for the English 😁 Depending on how I round off since this app's timestamp only showing to the nearest second. I think the German was faster! lol

Never in my life I would have thought that I'd be waiting in excitement for a physics episode but here I am! Thank you!

@Yolo_Swagins

2 жыл бұрын

Yes me naither, i wish that in elementary school we actualy hawe someone able to show us how anmazing physics is. I would definitely choose different path in my life.

@mahikannakiham2477

2 жыл бұрын

@@Yolo_Swagins But then you would inevitably have to study some "boring math" and may choose a different path yet another time.

@MangySquirrel

Жыл бұрын

lol, same.

Some parts go over my head a little... and yet I still love to learn how physics expands our understanding of the universe!

Never really took the idea of extra dimensions seriously until I watched this. I tried to keep an open mind to the possibility but this is first time I've felt there might actually be something to it. Very well (and clearly) explained! - Can't wait for next week's episode!

Arrgggghhhh... what a cliffhanger! Can't wait for next week's episode. Great stuff!

This was the best overview providing the background on this topic I've seen. I'm glad the point about geometry of higher dimensions not be an easy given came up, and that it's fairly recent. I always wondered about that.

My hope is some kid somewhere watches this type video and becomes inspired. How many Einstein’s have fallen through the cracks of poverty or abuse . Anyway this is a great service academic folks like Sabine is providing.

@Bunny99s

3 жыл бұрын

Right. Just like Ramanujan. We had some great minds that come out of the ordinary. Think of Pierre de Fermat who was a judge and did mathematics has a hobby. Our currently used public / private key algorithm RSA is based on the results of fermat's little theorem. At the time of it's discovery no one could think of any practical application. That's what a lot of people forget: Science is not done by individuals. Science always builds upon previous ideas and knowledge. Some claim that Einstein was a fraud because a lot of the equations he used in his theory of relativity were discovered by others before him. But that's completely pointless. Again, science build on top of pervious knowledge. Sometimes it just takes a great mind to connect the dots that were there for a long time. That doesn't make such an achievement any less great. The invention of the car is a result of the invention of the steam engine and the invention of the wheel. That doesn't make that invention any less amazing. Just the right input at the right time may lead to the next ground breaking discovery or insight. Many inventions and discoveries in the past were pure luck and by accident. Like penicillin, radioactivity, x-rays, vaseline, gunpowder, microwave oven and many other things.

@garymathis1042

2 жыл бұрын

How many Einstein's were lost from abortion?

9:35 every now and then I actually understand something 1+3+1+2+4=11 YAEY!!🥳

To explain such a complicated subject takes so much more than just understanding it… explaining in detail is the proof of knowledge

Your consistency with Saturday’s videos is incredible. Thanks a lot :)

What amazes me is that tiny dimensions were proposed by a man named "Klein".

@CAThompson

3 жыл бұрын

gott dammit

@arctic_haze

3 жыл бұрын

I wonder whether Kaluza's surname is relevant. He was a Gernan scientist eho came from Silesia and had a Polish surname neaning "puddle". Do you see a connection?

@LuisAldamiz

3 жыл бұрын

@@arctic_haze - clean as a puddle?

@deth3021

3 жыл бұрын

That's how you know the ones running the simulation are just ducking with us.

@rushunnhfernandes

3 жыл бұрын

can you explain that statement to a non-german speaker

Out of all the physics youtube channels, yours is the best and most refreshingly upfront and real. Btw please keep doing your music video as well they’re pretty cool Sabine!

I absolutely love your sense of humor, so one of a kind. That “that guy again” bit always gets to me.

You should talk about the properties of regular spacetime, the physics constants, the number of dimensions, and attempt to answer questions about what spacetime is made of.

So clear explanation, just a pleasure to watch till the end. Thank you, professor.

Thank you Ms Hossenfelder. I am very grateful for your work.

@brendonverbsanoun

2 жыл бұрын

@Greg Jacques I would imagine it's hard to stop being at work when you do what she does!

@brendonverbsanoun

2 жыл бұрын

@Greg Jacques mmmmm..... So much mmmmmmmmm!!

@brendonverbsanoun

2 жыл бұрын

@Greg Jacques 😂🤣👍

Excellent explanation and insights into topic of higher dimensions within physical theories. I'm hoping the second part has more details explaining how and why extra dimensions are needed in string theory and M-theory -- your style of presenting always adds another "dimension" to the understanding,

Ahhhh a cliffhanger, love it. I am just a fascinated lay person and have been following string theory for about 10 years on that level, you know KZread videos and a few books. In the last couple years I went from pretty much a solid believer in string theory (it just makes so much intuitive sense) but have to admit that support or belief as been waning so I can't wait for part two to see where you fall in this discussion.

Your videos are just great. If some one had told me that one time the best part of my saturday afternoon would be watching a physics vid ...

2:14 me watching this 4D structure in this 3D world on my 2D screen with my 1D brain.! Turns out I became Einstein.

@rmehta54

3 жыл бұрын

That guy again!

@johnnisshansen

3 жыл бұрын

Sound like 0D understanding

@aurelienyonrac

3 жыл бұрын

At leats you are here, That is 0 dimension.

@gsalien2292

3 жыл бұрын

All while multi-tasking playing 6D chess!!!

@simonmultiverse6349

3 жыл бұрын

You use the numbers 1, 2, 3 and 4. Guess what? 1+2+3+4 = 10 and this is a 10-dimensional universe. I think of time as something different and special, since it does not describe space. Our universe is really 10+1 dimensions, not 11 dimensions.

Great job on this video, I'm really looking forward to seeing part 2. Well done! Also love the video edits, the 😬 emoji made me chuckle

Fermi used to say something like, give me enough parameters and I can fit an elephant to the data. Any two-bit physicist could come up with ideas using higher dimensions. Try working with a single dimension and see if you could envision a beautiful and elegant theory that could make sense of the physical world.

Suns coming up and I’m having tea with my favorite physicist Sabine! Cheers!

Thanks. That was helpful. I got an “A” in introductory linear algebra, but it was not very satisfying because I can’t visualize the results. That explanation of the three extra dimensions to include three dimensional momentum along with the position was interesting. I’m taking the Great Courses Linear Algebra course to refresh my memory and take it a bit further. Looking forward to the next video.

your content is so much better than dozens of documentaries... many thanks

I always look forward to your videos. Great content Sabine and nicely presented. Thank you.

Sabine i just had this dream today that me and my epidemiology professor were talking about some big book you wrote about the g2 muon ! it seems so real !! just wanted to share :p

@SabineHossenfelder

3 жыл бұрын

Well, I *am* writing on a book and last week I was *also* writing about the muon g-2, alas the g-2 isn't in the book. But it was pretty close to reality!

@12jalbrandao

3 жыл бұрын

@@SabineHossenfelder Lol, this guy is almost a prophet.

@tim40gabby25

3 жыл бұрын

@@12jalbrandao Almost a prophet, by strict definition, is not a prophet. Old uk duffer here, enjoying the ride :)

@ollebo

3 жыл бұрын

@@tim40gabby25 What if the almost-prophet had a few extra dimensions? ;)

@O_Lee69

3 жыл бұрын

@@SabineHossenfelder Hallo Sabine, ich würde mich auch sehr über ein statement von dir freuen. Als interessierter Laie habe ich folgende Fragezeichen: Die Abweichung zwischen Vorhersage und Messung ist sehr gering. Kann es a) ein Fehler in der Vorhersage sein? b) ein systematischer Fehler sein? (das Experiment wurde in derselben Anlage im Fermilab durchgeführt. Diese ist im Vergleich zum CERN winzig. Wurden eventuell auftretende Zentrifugalkräfte und/oder das Verhalten der Myonen bei relativistischen Effekten (träge Masse) unzureichend berücksichtigt? Schließlich ging es um das "Wackeln" der Myonen durch die Wechselwirkung mit virtuellen Teilchen. Außerdem stört mich, dass immer sofort nach einer "neuen" oder "5." Kraft gerufen wird. Kleiner scheint es nicht zu gehen. Das klingt für mich immer als Schrei nach mehr Forschungsgeldern. Vielen Dank.

Vacant stare is my default response to these lectures. Like a dog listening to owner's verbalizations.

@bobh28630

3 жыл бұрын

“The mind, once stretched by a new idea, never returns to its original dimensions.” ― Ralph Waldo Emerson An added benefit: the teacher is mesmerizing!

@GeoffreyFeldmanMA

3 жыл бұрын

Instead of allowing yourself the luxury of asserting a "vacant stare", allow yourself the enjoyment of thinking harder, listening again, follow up on the references. Otherwise it's a bit like someone who just watches sports and doesn't actually get any exercise simply because you don't think you will be a major league player.

@gregbrown5020

3 жыл бұрын

Feldman: not gleefully celebrating ignorance. Stating that clearly I'm not one of her intended audience. A furrowed brow and attitude adjustment is not going to change what is into what should be.

@lamblyn

3 жыл бұрын

Same. At least we're not under fluorescent light.

@andrewharper1609

3 жыл бұрын

@@greggoog7559 Unless he is spending it on religion.

great stuff. Those vids remind me of school when a teacher would explain , and i listened fascinated, nodding , understanding, it was all so clear. And after i'd just go back being clueless.

I really enjoy listening to you explain things that I thought I understood before.

Apparently some sneaky entity is wandering around rolling up dimensions just for giggles...

@ldbarthel

3 жыл бұрын

The Prince must roll up the katamari to grow bigger.... Na na na na na na na na na Na na na na na na.....

@pedrolmlkzk

3 жыл бұрын

Wouldnt be surprised

@rustybolts8953

3 жыл бұрын

Very sneaky operator. Like your sense of hummer. Nasal breathing and humming produces NO, I just found out..

@sa.8208

3 жыл бұрын

I imagine our 3D life's float in a subatomic 5D soup.. With time being a abstract 'Window pane for entities above us'' we basically amoeba from the perspective of the entities. the same way the strange subatomic quantum world is to us.. is what we are to the higher entities.. very possibly in scale / size / and importance. we are but long hyper dimensional time worms burrowing through the space they inhabit, fresh born baby's at one end, and a dusty corpse at the other... branching through time like a tree of sex and maternal instinct.. the mother.

@justlisten82

Жыл бұрын

​@@sa.8208interesting way to think about it! Thanks for sharing.

Sabine: Space! me: The finale frontier! Sabine: The way we experience it has 3 dimensions me: *sad Star Trek noises*

@lordkekz4

3 жыл бұрын

That was exactly my reaction!

@shockwave326

3 жыл бұрын

extra dimensions and alt universe's make for great TV dont they? but sadly are NOT real,,,, so start the tears for the stupid theories ya thats the right thing to do

@deth3021

3 жыл бұрын

Surely with extra dimension, space wouldn't be the final frontier?

@goartist

3 жыл бұрын

@@deth3021 space entails 2 frontiers. inner and outer

@deth3021

3 жыл бұрын

@@goartist not classically. It also doesn t apply to the star trek reference. The closest relevant thing might be the inner frontiers edge. Inner frontier is typically used for spiritual reference.

Thank you for the short lecture! Very clear explanation as always!

Not pretending I understand ANY of this but I just saw another video regarding Muon and their strange existence AND vibrations which makes me wonder if they're rolled up in their own rolled-up dimension - FASCINATING!

A new video, awesome! This is such a great channel -- I finally get to understand some high level concepts without a lot of sensationalism and misleading BS. Just the facts. Thank you so much!

KZread has extra dimensions. That’s where they keep the ads.

@rodgermyles2871

3 жыл бұрын

@Goth Vaush - Jedi Master Engineer No because it supports the rest of it!

"Yes, that guy again." That just made my day! I'm really enjoying your videos. I feel I learn something new each time I watch one. There is true joy in that.

I love your channel!!! Incredible work, very clear lectures, visually beautiful videos. Please keep doing this incredible work :D

I wonder what more than one dimension of time would be like, if such a thing was possible 🤔

@slonslonimsky2013

3 жыл бұрын

If we assume that the future is not set, that would mean there must be infinite number of branching time lines. We just sit on one of them in each particular moment. Some of those time lines may even intersect. That would mean, the past is not set either. Different versions of the past could equally fit to our current state. Indeed, we cannot reconstruct our past from our present to any possible precision. Some events are irrevocably lost. That is, there may be different interpretations of the past. So, our current time line is branching in the past too. But all those time lines together must live in a certain space. That would be a multi-dimentional time space, because you need not only to identify the position on a particular time line (i.e. our current 'present'), but also which time line it is (among lots of others). How many dimensions would be needed for that is unclear. Such a space would be quite complex thing. But it must definitely exist, at least theoretically.

@jamesbloom2613

3 жыл бұрын

Rolled up, of course

@SpykerSpeed

3 жыл бұрын

Your profile pic matches the emoji perfectly, lol.

@ss01101

3 жыл бұрын

@@slonslonimsky2013 Many Worlds Interpretation? String Theory?

@thomascoolidge2161

3 жыл бұрын

Slon has it correct. I like to imagine it like a book though.. imagine everything at this moment being a page of a book. Reading the book from beginning to end is the story of the universe. Change one page of the book and the story is different so it would be a different book. A book case would have every possible combination of books that told the possible stories of our universe with our laws of physics. Change our laws and you have a whole new universe of possibilities so it would have its own book case of possible books. The entire multiverse of universes would be an infinite library.

Hi Sabine, I love your videos ❤️please make a video on the muon G-2 experiment

@SabineHossenfelder

3 жыл бұрын

I wrote about this here: www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-the-standard-model-of-physics-now-broken/

I can't wait for the next week :D thank you Sabine great contribution to society!

I loved Sabine introduction when she said “in part one we will discuss things like Kalusa-Klein Theory and stuff like that.” - like I instantly was to know what she meant by “stuff like that.” Sabine is the greatest!

2:32: Arthur Cayley: the man who started posing as though he was talking on a mobile phone before even telephones were invented.

Thanks so much for the excellent explanation. Ich liebe Ihre Vorträge ❤️

I always look forward to these videos. Multiple physical dimensions are a particular subject of fascination for me. Thanks!

Ooh. This was a real mind-stretcher. Excellent video and looking forward to the rest of the story. Thank you.

It always amazes me that I comprehend all this when Sabine presents.

@andrewmhurth9845

3 жыл бұрын

Im totally lost

I knew the names but never the history or details of Kaluza Klein Theory. Thank you for making such an easy to understand introduction to it. I look forward to part 2! Do you think you'd ever make a video on your PhD thesis? It was the first time I'd ever heard of the concept of black hole relics and I'd really like to hear more about it.

Great video! I'm looking forward to hear your comments on the recent measurements of anomaly in the magnetic momentum of muons at Fermi Lab, and the also recent results from LHC.

Great video thank you for sharing this information I feel like I've learned more watching these videos then I ever did in my years of schooling

Will you do a video on the results of the muon g-2 experiment?

@SabineHossenfelder

3 жыл бұрын

Not specifically, but I have one coming up on data anomalies in particle physics in general. It's tentatively planned for the last Saturday in April.

@SabineHossenfelder

3 жыл бұрын

I wrote about it here though, in case you are interested: www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-the-standard-model-of-physics-now-broken/

@theoreticalphysicistzeinaq2753

3 жыл бұрын

@@SabineHossenfelder I am 13 years old and I am taking Quantum physics college level and please can u make a video about Graviton boson and Quantum Gravity,,,,,,please!?

@babublue69

3 жыл бұрын

@@SabineHossenfelder summary of this articles... Nothing find out yet...

Thanks Sabine for another great video, and also for what you do to a sweater!

This is the best video I've seen on extra dimensions. It actually makes sense instead of making it sound mystical.

Great, lucid talk on a complex topic.👌 At 4.25 - “Yes. That guy” about Einstein! Only you can handle such a thing with elan!

Looks like Sabine has been working on her presentation style. Keep up the good work! 👍

@PilatesGuy1

3 жыл бұрын

👍Agree. I earned Toastmasters Gold Level, which took years of work. These days Sabine seems like she has Toastmasters Diamond Plus. Simply exceptional presentation skills. Would actually be interested in how she did it.

Albert E would have Loved to Hear your Sabine Stuff.🧡

@hans-joachimbierwirth4727

3 жыл бұрын

He would not.

@einsteindrieu

3 жыл бұрын

@@buddysnackit1758 why not ?

@wishusknight3009

3 жыл бұрын

@@einsteindrieu Einstein didn't subscribe to quantum mechanics.

@einsteindrieu

3 жыл бұрын

@@wishusknight3009 Yes I know. He didn't know where Time and small gravity comes from.

@wishusknight3009

3 жыл бұрын

@@buddysnackit1758 So if you are smarter than all the physicists in the world, publish a paper and win the nobel prize.

Just stumbled onto this channel, and I definitely like it so far! I'm a big fan of PBS Spacetime and Sixty Symbols, so I'm all about adding another science channel to my mix!

Compliments for the video. The best explanation I've seen why we need extra dimensions to explain all the necessary aspects in physics. Thank you.

Another blockbuster of information, including 11 dimensions. Thank you, Sabine!

Are the dimensions relative to each observer, or are they universal?

@SabineHossenfelder

3 жыл бұрын

Very good question! I wish I'd thought about this when I made the video. The short answer is that they're universal. The number of dimensions is not an observer dependent-statement.

@0MoTheG

3 жыл бұрын

Plz explain the question.

@ifonlyiwassaner

3 жыл бұрын

@@0MoTheG Think of it this way: time is not universal, it is relative to the observers, that's why two people can experience times differently depending on their frame of reference. If time is relative what about the other proposed dimensions? That's what heisag is cleverly asking 😉

@swissmix1

3 жыл бұрын

@@SabineHossenfelder their size?

I marvel at how you can pull so many complicated things together and come up with a somewhat useful perspective - I guess that´s what being smart is all about. Thanks

Dr. Hossenfelder, Early in my engineering career, I had deep exposure and need for vector and matrix methods, focusing only on outcomes not geometric visualization. I appreciated your clear description and graphics of vectors. Warm regards.

So many possibilities and so many questions, I cry a little that I will live not long enough to learn the truths.

@CAThompson

3 жыл бұрын

We're all a bit less confused now, at least.

@chuckadams4400

3 жыл бұрын

Relax. When you die, you get to see ALL the Truths.

@CAThompson

3 жыл бұрын

@@chuckadams4400 Or nothing. Maybe that's the Truth? ;)

@CAThompson

3 жыл бұрын

@Schlomo Baconberg No thanks, I don't think I'd have much fun there. At least I know I'll have fun as well as learn a bit more over here first. :)

@zualapips1638

3 жыл бұрын

@Schlomo Baconberg What do you mean?

Never clicked on a video faster

The Great Courses is a beautiful platform. The course on food, with beautiful cooking, throughout history and from the different cultures around the world, taught by Ken Albala is amazing and was life changing. I would but a course from you if you produced a course there. You have the enthusiasm and joy for teaching. You do a good job breaking things down. 🙏

Thank you Sabine, your clear way of speaking help me to understand, even if english is not my mother language. Your scientific way of thinking help me to understand the world without biases, i admire your job. Hello from Brazil!

Recently I had been pondering - Could there be a connection between the three observable spatial dimensions and the three generations of particles in the Standard Model? Ex: Could it be that generation 1 particles only vibrate on a single plane. were generation 2 particles vibrate on 2, etc? Just a weird thought and I was interested if it had ever been pursued before.

@Nibsipipsi

Жыл бұрын

There are some problems with that. Firstly, a single dimension can't hold a plane. A plane is a space that requires more than one dimension. Secondly, if a particle vibrated in only one dimension, it means it would be static in all other dimensions. So if all generation 1 particles would only vary in the "x" dimension, but not the "y" or "z" dimensions, that means that all electrons would only be found on a single line in the "x" direction, which clearly isn't the case. Finally, the number "3" really isn't that special. So the fact that there are three spatial dimensions and also three generations of fermions, really is no reason to assume that it's anything more than coincidence.

My Physics teacher was also named Kaluza and I just noticed that his face looks kind of similar to Theodor's...

.....always a pleasure to catch your show, doc! Thanks!

I had previously made a comment about the reality of 'other' dimensions and this video has helped explain to me what these actually mean. I find the concepts of Harmonics particularly interesting as I can get my head around that and understand the universe has it's 'own' frequency.

Please comment on the 4 new particles discovered by the LHC, last week.

@ralos5930

3 жыл бұрын

they're not particles mate, they are names given to things that are effecting other things. They only get names because we get stuck. And these 4 new particles are math theories, ie the math requires them as they create the alibi it requires. there is no such thing as a 'particle' there are no little balls racing around, it's all electrostatics and the fuzz created around the nucleus is charge potential only created by electrostatics itself.

Such cliffhanger at the end!

Best one yet! Great job. I enjoy your mind.

Great cliffhanger, I'm excited about the next part!

Waiting for a "muon" video soon :)

She's gonna destroy string theory so hard next week.

@wkgmathguy218

3 жыл бұрын

I'm quite looking forward to that.

@isntitabeautifulday1648

3 жыл бұрын

@Goth Vaush - Jedi Master Engineer If it's a trial by combat, strings aren't gonna cut it.

Excelent video, Sabine. Thanks, love your work.

THANK YOU for flashing the exact papers!!! Now I know what I'm looking for. Also, you look really nice and did you get a new camera??

Ribbed sweater and liking your hair Sabine ❤️😍

It’s hard to focus on the physics with that lovely sweater.

Thanks so much Sabine! Have been about higher dimensionality for awhile now; higher dimensions have some very interesting properties mathmatically speaking...

great video, can not wait for the next week!!

Finally, a science communicator referred to these eleven dimensions and actually deigned to mention what they are! I'd always hear, "they're curled up" without the slightest elaboration. Yes, I know that I am not going to understand it, but I will not be injured by scaffolding, either.

@vast634

3 жыл бұрын

Kernel function in support vector machines use additions dimensions to solve problems. EG: use additional dimensions if the math does not work. It a cheap trick to make the math work, it does not mean there are additional dimensions in reality.

@michaeljones7465

3 жыл бұрын

@@vast634 Length, width, depth, duration, light, gravity, velocity & space-time. Now you know all the dimensions are real.

Great lecture om an interesting subject. Thank you ...

She is a wonderful teacher . Thank you Sabine for your honest and exact explanations with that sweet accent of yours.

Excellent video! Thank you for reading the quote in the original German and then translating.

I love your videos Sabine, along with Space-Time.

Sabine's words have gravity of their own. Bringing modern physics back to earth in a way it doesn't want, but needs.

This was a rad topic! Thanks for 'splaining it!

thanks for another kick-ass treatment of an amazingly interesting and complex topic!

It's been said if you can make something complicated sound clear and simple, you have a true grasp of the subject.

Saturday morning 8am? Time for some mind-bending science with Sabine

Always clear and dense of informations.

Thanks so much for clearing up!

Brilliant presentation, as always. Thank you

This is not about physics, but I like a lot your smile in the videos miniatures in the presentation before click to watch the video, Sabine. About the videos, incredible content as always

Thankyou Sabine. I love your explanation more than anything.

The exact things that I didn't know that I desperately needed to know. Thanks!