This is how you respectfully adress a topic like this. Thank you

@bruceolga3644

16 күн бұрын

Do ewe huemans even comprehend what was shown in this video...ewe huemans should have brain for own comprehending; ewe huemans are fixed ribosome waiting for mRNA data programming to copy, paste, and & DNA 🧬 y transmit the data given back like parroting parrots 🦜 👁️ 🦁🔥

"We can only expand to the cage of our belief system." Wise words. Powerful. Thank you for sharing. ❤

To be alive now, being apart of breaking out of the old systems & beliefs is a extraordinary time .. We all are going to watch magic happen together- absolutely remarkable ❤

Thank you for that beautiful response. It’s a combination of truth and kindness 🙏

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

18 күн бұрын

We see spirals in mathematics because we live ultimately in a torrential shape universe but we are not the fundamental highest spatial Dimension but in the fundamental highest spatial Dimension it is closer to toroidal in shape... just following the logical progression of the spatial dimensions 0 dimensional is absolute nothing, infinite amounts of absolute nothing can stack into any size one-dimensional existence and infinite amounts of one-dimensional existence can stack into any size two-dimensional existence and infinite amount of two dimensional existence can stack into any size three dimensional existence and so we can follow this logically established pattern and infinite 3d existence can stack into ANYSIZE 4d existence... infinite 3d Multiverse becomes fundamental if 4d exists... Madela effects show us a piece of the puzzle... we would expect to see the relative state or shape of the universe as flat if we are not the fundamental highest spatial Dimension because we live in a 3D World and this means the 4D would be compressing our 3D existence making it stack infinitely which would thus give us the appearance of a relatively flat state or shape of the universe which is exactly what we do observe... I decided to come back and watch your video because I only caught the end... really it's a problem with unit measurement. Like for instance $1×$1=$2 because both amounts represent a volumetric number and not a baseline number... We should definitely have a $1² and $1³ system whereas $1²=$2 and $1³=$4..

In a time when new insights will be reached, we must have the guts to question everything without resorting to the old impulses. Nicely done, REG!

I appreciate you and your mind. You are amazingly gracious and you don't give a yes or no answer. You give evidence. Love to you

Reaffirmation and great way to tie it up at the end. I think alot of people are also having selective hearing/understanding and just need to look at the information with the neutral notion of " know that you know nothing and then all is revealed to you" this allows the person to better understand and be aware of other new information from a diff perspective

The geometry actually helped. Because of the value being visual....

@ShifuCareaga

19 күн бұрын

Here's a simpler visual. Hold up one finger. How many one fingers are you looking at? One group of one finger. 😂 I have exactly one group of a specific one finger for all the people believed an actor off Empire discovered secret math no one else did. Terrence is a fraud and Robert is being nice but I don't have to. Terrence defrauded my friend ... So We call that out. You don't need geometry to see Terrence is wrong.

@taviimihaimsc

18 күн бұрын

@@ShifuCareaga Terrence is backed up by the entire universe buddy. try again. You are backed up by your singular finger. Keep sleeping babyboy

@tthecruxx

16 күн бұрын

​@taviimihaimsc the entire universe is also in his finger 😅

@troyrager1352

13 күн бұрын

​@@taviimihaimscno he's not he's backed up by his ego.

REG thank you for your existence 🙏 I simply adore you .. what a being and a gift you are to us 🎉😊

The universe is a spectrum in it of itself so it’s only fitting that the answer to all problems lie within a spectrum as well. I love the intellectual conversations that spark from your videos. Truly one of the most digestible orators of the spiritual movement and I’m glad you’re in the good side. Hope to be a part of the new Orion social media platform, I’m ready to truly transcend with the rest of the team 🙏🏽💜🙏🏽

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

18 күн бұрын

In howards system 1×1=2, 2×2=5, 3×3=10, 4×4=17... it Holds! Recheck your math! It doesn't spiral out of control! Rerun the numbers with this sequence!!!!!

Thank you for talking about this! I love how you’re setting the tone for a response to be presented and dialogue to be encouraged. You were creative and not in any way polarizing- this is the space where many great things may occur.

Omg, thank you for addressing this. I have been seeing Terrence Howard’s everywhere on KZread talking about this and listening to what he says but having a hard time understanding how he was explaining it. Thank you for the visuals.

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

18 күн бұрын

We see spirals in mathematics because we live ultimately in a torrential shape universe but we are not the fundamental highest spatial Dimension but in the fundamental highest spatial Dimension it is closer to toroidal in shape... just following the logical progression of the spatial dimensions 0 dimensional is absolute nothing, infinite amounts of absolute nothing can stack into any size one-dimensional existence and infinite amounts of one-dimensional existence can stack into any size two-dimensional existence and infinite amount of two dimensional existence can stack into any size three dimensional existence and so we can follow this logically established pattern and infinite 3d existence can stack into ANYSIZE 4d existence... infinite 3d Multiverse becomes fundamental if 4d exists... Madela effects show us a piece of the puzzle... we would expect to see the relative state or shape of the universe as flat if we are not the fundamental highest spatial Dimension because we live in a 3D World and this means the 4D would be compressing our 3D existence making it stack infinitely which would thus give us the appearance of a relatively flat state or shape of the universe which is exactly what we do observe... I decided to come back and watch your video because I only caught the end... really it's a problem with unit measurement. Like for instance $1×$1=$2 because both amounts represent a volumetric number and not a baseline number... We should definitely have a $1² and $1³ system whereas $1²=$2 and $1³=$4

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

18 күн бұрын

In howards system 1×1=2, 2×2=5, 3×3=10, 4×4=17... it Holds! Recheck your math! It doesn't spiral out of control! Rerun the numbers with this sequence!!!!

Proof. This is how we move forward. Dead reckoning back to the one. Thank you and please continue to be the balance we need in these rough seas of progress.

@Acoustic-Rabbit-Hole

19 күн бұрын

Yes. And I also like how R.E. Grant didn’t dwell on the scandal of it, and how the media was completely badgering Terrence. He came from a calm, non-judgement perspective, acknowledged that he was defending Terrance Howard and simply moved forward with his own theories. Well done.// I’m actually working with his people on a new piano tuning that Robert has invented which is referenced against A432hz scientific pitch. I’m promoting the new tuning on my note-to-color music theory channel, and sharing the notes of the tuning so that piano tuners can apply this tuning. (And yes, it sounds way better than standard equal temperament. He calls his tuning “Precise Temperament” and it is actually a form of Well Tempering.) My work on this is here at: _The Acoustic Rabbit Hole_ for those interested.

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

18 күн бұрын

We see spirals in mathematics because we live ultimately in a torrential shape universe but we are not the fundamental highest spatial Dimension but in the fundamental highest spatial Dimension it is closer to toroidal in shape... just following the logical progression of the spatial dimensions 0 dimensional is absolute nothing, infinite amounts of absolute nothing can stack into any size one-dimensional existence and infinite amounts of one-dimensional existence can stack into any size two-dimensional existence and infinite amount of two dimensional existence can stack into any size three dimensional existence and so we can follow this logically established pattern and infinite 3d existence can stack into ANYSIZE 4d existence... infinite 3d Multiverse becomes fundamental if 4d exists... Madela effects show us a piece of the puzzle... we would expect to see the relative state or shape of the universe as flat if we are not the fundamental highest spatial Dimension because we live in a 3D World and this means the 4D would be compressing our 3D existence making it stack infinitely which would thus give us the appearance of a relatively flat state or shape of the universe which is exactly what we do observe... I decided to come back and watch your video because I only caught the end... really it's a problem with unit measurement. Like for instance $1×$1=$2 because both amounts represent a volumetric number and not a baseline number... We should definitely have a $1² and $1³ system whereas $1²=$2 and $1³=$4...

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

18 күн бұрын

​@@Acoustic-Rabbit-Holeultraviolet or purple is the future and the passionate positive the blue is the neutral positive and in between the yellow and green is the now or flow... Red is passion,past, negative. The passion must be combined with the positive to come together to bring forth the future which is the ultraviolet... 💚💜

@Acoustic-Rabbit-Hole

18 күн бұрын

@@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler I forget what they call it but there is the Purple Plate treated metal plate, and it was invented by a scientist friend of Niko’s Tesla. I think the whole concept is called the Violet Ray. Also, speaking of violet as the future, i see b as violet, and B is, to me the key of ultimate transition. I’m just finishing my next video called “Why Ghostbusters Was Written in the Key o Ghosts!”

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

17 күн бұрын

@@Acoustic-Rabbit-Hole i just learned about theses plates and bought one because of my logical beliefs align...

Robert - I recently enjoyed your interview w/Aubrey & Matias. While you were speaking, I noticed a new softening and humbleness in your face. I’ve been watching/learning from you for months so the comparison is over that time. The feeling I had while watching was the divine feminine being present and revealed within you & shining from within you. I simply want to let you know - I see you ❤

Square root of a number is a value, which on multiplication by itself, _gives the original number._

It’s amazing how intelligent this man is!!

What a respectful response. Thanks for this.

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

18 күн бұрын

In howards system 1×1=2, 2×2=5, 3×3=10, 4×4=17... it Holds! Recheck your math! It doesn't spiral out of control! Rerun the numbers with this sequence!!!!

@Passion_killer

18 күн бұрын

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler I don't agree that it does hold. 1x1=1. But for me it doesn't invalidate some of his other points.

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

18 күн бұрын

@@Passion_killer well its a system for volumetric calculations. $1×$1=$1²=$2 whereas $1×1=$1 its not meant to replace anything... it's to fix volumetric multiplication.

@middle-agedmacdonald2965

17 күн бұрын

Quacks, it's like birds of a feather sticking together, even though they don't believe a dang thing they squawk about.

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

17 күн бұрын

@@middle-agedmacdonald2965 who do you represent?

This reminds me of the “war” between the number 3 and 4… which is the most spiritual. In his 1570 Preface to Euclid, John Dee writes: “We consider a Unit to be a Mathematical thing, though it be no number, as it is indivisible." John Dee refused to use 1 because it is not a number. Worth it to study the Monas hieroglyphica… he never uses one! Aristotle also wrote: "The smallest number, in the strict sense of the word number, is two.”

@kricketflyd111

16 күн бұрын

Perspective

@bruceolga3644

16 күн бұрын

On the QWERTY the number 3 shares the key with E; the E is 5th place in line making E3=8... ewe huemans should be aware more 👁️🦁🔥

@bruceolga3644

16 күн бұрын

On the QWERTY the number 3 shares the key with E; the E is 5th place in line making E3=8... ewe huemans should be aware more 👁️🦁🔥

@bruceolga3644

16 күн бұрын

4 is half of 8; this is factual since overlapping the two fours slightly at the ends create an 8, or hourglass ⌛⏳ ewe huemans should be aware more 👁️🦁🔥

@kricketflyd111

16 күн бұрын

@@bruceolga3644 🔥👺🌐👀

I was eagerly waiting for your perspective on this topic 💎

Great answer. If a person can get past the 1x1=2 (not true from Euclidian math's perspective) they can still see Terrence has plenty of other good observations and points. Einstein said plenty of incorrect things, yet we still revere him, even when he said his own ideas were incorrect! Genius is not being 100% correct. Genius is having the ability to see from other perspectives to then learn through negation of untruths.

@ShifuCareaga

19 күн бұрын

"We" don't revere Einstein. He was wrong. Terrence is wrong. That's the end of it.

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

18 күн бұрын

In howards system 1×1=2, 2×2=5, 3×3=10, 4×4=17... it Holds! Recheck your math! It doesn't spiral out of control! Rerun the numbers with this sequence!!!!

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

18 күн бұрын

Well if you think $1×$1=$1 then please let me "Multiply" you're money for you... Give me 2 $1 bills and i will multiply them by each other... if you're still convinced $1 * $1 equals $1 then I get to keep your other dollar and put it in my pocket and hand you back your $1 and say the multiplication is complete now you have half less then the start of the equation...

@Robert_Edward_Grant

18 күн бұрын

"F"

@user-nt3vr5ek6n

5 күн бұрын

@@AquarianSoulTimeTravelerthis mf can turn two $5 bills into $26

I've been waiting for this. No attacking of character proof to counter a claim that was made. 🙏

I humbly make a request to have a round table discussion on your podcast with these folks; Terrance Howard, Billy Carson, Matias De Stefano and Donald Hoffman. A true live discussion with no pre discussion as to demonstrate the process by which high level conscious folks can have differing perceptions and set aside their own cognitive dissonance (anything we have held as always and absolutely true because we were TOLD) and see the benefit of such a discussion potentially birthing something totally brand new.

Buddha said: “All that we are is the result of what we have thought. The mind is everything. What we think we become.” With this statement Buddha was implying "what mind and thought produces" and not any indication of "how mind and thought works". Buddha also said that "thought is the cause of all suffering", indicating that it has some sort of connection to "emotions" and the nature of personal experience. I think that Buddha was building on earlier Hindu "how thought works" systems, one of which is "Thought Feeds Off Itself", as in the image of the snake eating its own tail. Another thing that "mind and thought" can produce is "insanity". Thought also produces "Beliefs" which are nothing more than "thought recycling itself", the snake eating its own tail. Which sort of explains the institutions of education today, the "thought recycling" echo chambers (snake eating its own tail) has led to some very bizarre results. (one might even say insanity.) To actually "change" that, (thought feeding off itself) requires the DECONSTRUCTION of the previous "thought recycling" systems. (beliefs) And apparently another way that "thought works" is there appears a self protection mechanism where it does not normally subject itself to "critical judgement" or "critical review" of what are "actual facts", what are "opinions", and what are "assumptions". I appreciate what you are doing here, "smashing the thought echo chamber" even though it will require that I DECONSTRUCT a lot of my previous thought and belief systems, in order to understand that approach to reality.

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

18 күн бұрын

In howards system 1×1=2, 2×2=5, 3×3=10, 4×4=17... it Holds! Recheck your math! It doesn't spiral out of control! Rerun the numbers with this sequence!!!!

My gut told me that 1x1=2 was just a play on words and otherwise BS. Thank you for showing me WHY! love your work Robert

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

18 күн бұрын

We see spirals in mathematics because we live ultimately in a torrential shape universe but we are not the fundamental highest spatial Dimension but in the fundamental highest spatial Dimension it is closer to toroidal in shape... just following the logical progression of the spatial dimensions 0 dimensional is absolute nothing, infinite amounts of absolute nothing can stack into any size one-dimensional existence and infinite amounts of one-dimensional existence can stack into any size two-dimensional existence and infinite amount of two dimensional existence can stack into any size three dimensional existence and so we can follow this logically established pattern and infinite 3d existence can stack into ANYSIZE 4d existence... infinite 3d Multiverse becomes fundamental if 4d exists... Madela effects show us a piece of the puzzle... we would expect to see the relative state or shape of the universe as flat if we are not the fundamental highest spatial Dimension because we live in a 3D World and this means the 4D would be compressing our 3D existence making it stack infinitely which would thus give us the appearance of a relatively flat state or shape of the universe which is exactly what we do observe... I decided to come back and watch your video because I only caught the end... really it's a problem with unit measurement. Like for instance $1×$1=$2 because both amounts represent a volumetric number and not a baseline number... We should definitely have a $1² and $1³ system whereas $1²=$2 and $1³=$4.

Thank you for the geometry. Terrence is onto much however, just like us All, we must continue with an open mind and hone our understanding. More is always revealed as WE continue to seek ♾️

Thank you so much for addressing this!

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

18 күн бұрын

In howards system 1×1=2, 2×2=5, 3×3=10, 4×4=17... it Holds! Recheck your math! It doesn't spiral out of control! Rerun the numbers with this sequence!!!!Well if you think $1×$1=$1 then please let me "Multiply" you're money for you... Give me 2 $1 bills and i will multiply them by each other... if you're still convinced $1 * $1 equals $1 then I get to keep your other dollar and put it in my pocket and hand you back your $1 and say the multiplication is complete now you have half less then the start of the equation...

Thanks. You give me food for thought!

Thank you Robert. You explained it so well and easily understood. Love and light to you ❤

Thank you Robert Edward Grant for all your great knowledge. Blessings always.

Thank you Robert 👌 you explain things so well 🌹

That is a very SOLID explanation. Appreciate the insight! 👊👊

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

18 күн бұрын

In howards system 1×1=2, 2×2=5, 3×3=10, 4×4=17... it Holds! Recheck your math! It doesn't spiral out of control! Rerun the numbers with this sequence!!!!

@Robert_Edward_Grant

18 күн бұрын

I'm sorry but no. It doesn't do anything but make you look really uneducated at all.

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

17 күн бұрын

@@Robert_Edward_Grant Well if you think $1×$1=$1 then please let me "Multiply" you're money for you... Give me 2 $1 bills and i will "multiply" them by each other... if you're still convinced $1×$1=$1 then I get to keep your other dollar and put it in my pocket and hand you back your $1 and say the multiplication is complete now you have half less then the start of the equation...

So much appreciation for your gracious explanation on this conversation. Your perspective is very diplomatic & respectful of Terence Howard's concept. I knew you would have a concise response. This I feel reflects your professionalism & heart centeredness.

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

18 күн бұрын

In howards system 1×1=2, 2×2=5, 3×3=10, 4×4=17... it Holds! Recheck your math! It doesn't spiral out of control! Rerun the numbers with this sequence!!!!Well if you think $1×$1=$1 then please let me "Multiply" you're money for you... Give me 2 $1 bills and i will multiply them by each other... if you're still convinced $1 * $1 equals $1 then I get to keep your other dollar and put it in my pocket and hand you back your $1 and say the multiplication is complete now you have half less then the start of the equation...

But it was not proven here that 1*1 equals 2. By the way from 1²+1²=2 and 1*1=2 follows that 2+2=2 and obv 2=0.

What is this? It's soo much smoke, so many turns, where the answer is simply 'no'. A syntactical approach would suffice, 1 minute.

@Dmyra

16 күн бұрын

seriously! i love the fellow but dang. be nice and polite and with all love say No

Robert, I discovered you on the Know Thyself podcast, and have listened to a few others, love your work. I would tend to agree with your explanation on this one, however don't you think in this case it is different considering that Terrance Howard's theories suggest that there are no straight lines in creation (your triangle proof making use of straight lines), and that there is actually no real static value for anything as nothing remains still and is always in motion. Thank you for your explanation, it does provide great evidence for us to decide for ourselves.

@Robert_Edward_Grant

18 күн бұрын

I also do not agree there are no straight lines in nature. I can give many examples that refute this altogether.

@jeremiahh.3383

12 күн бұрын

​@@Robert_Edward_GrantCould it not be possible that Howard has created a lense that has enabled him to notice new illusions that although an illusion can still be used to drive practical understandings in the the same sense that the illusion of the sky being blue, pink, or red has been used by sailers and farmers among others for years to make critical forward thinking decisions in often accurate expectation of how the next days weather might turn out?

@superconscious.

3 күн бұрын

@@Robert_Edward_Grant I beg you to make a video on Christ Consciousness not everyone is pretending to be smart. Most higher consciousness beings do not want to have any dealings with an inferior quality of knowledge like academia. Even better make a video on industrialisation and how it needs all the meat machines to function.

Thank you Sir for sharing your Input with everyone

Correct, the hypotenuse = 1.41 etc. I think of it this way; the Coplanar cotangent of 1*1 is 2. I think that makes more sense with Terrence's observation- according to how I've diagramed this in my channelling of yesteryears. That he's not wrong but that he's measuring a different dimensionality.

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

18 күн бұрын

Yes squarely. In howards system 1×1=2, 2×2=5, 3×3=10, 4×4=17... it Holds!

@troyrager1352

13 күн бұрын

​@@AquarianSoulTimeTravelerholding doesn't mean it's right, Nikola Tesla said math can build and prove all sorts of structures that don't exist in reality.

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

13 күн бұрын

@@troyrager1352 a⧈b=(a×b)+(a+b−1) i created this function for multiplication of volumetric units. a= volumetric unit, b= different set of same style of volumetric unit. This is for functions like $1×$4=$5 or $1×$1=$2 whereas regularly $1×1=$1... restart to run into problems when we multiply volumetric units like dollars with other volumetric units like other amounts of dollars... this simple calculation fixes it...

Thank you SO much! I watched several Terrence Howard interviews and I definitely have questions. I understand his enthusiasm and I am so glad he speaks with individuals like yourself and Billy Carson you both possess knowledge and wisdom.

Thanks for reaching me the spiral of theodorus! I love how you show the seamless nature of math, geometry and philosophy.

BRILLIANT! 4 my answer, i look to the technical definition. The Euclidean definition. 1, one time.. Is one. 1, two times.. Is 2. 0, zero times.. Is 0. 0, one time.. Is still a zero. Logic the math off paper, apply it to life as this man has in the video and you begin to see what school never taught us. Math is everywhere! However.. I believe that there is an incongruency in the assumptions of 1x1.. The manner in which we assume and apply the value of 1..not how we use it in this math system... In life, my efforts times your efforts breeds a value that although may be distinguished as only one result, that result is sometimes of exponentially more substantial measure than the mere sum of their efforts separately. That is all.. 😇 Keep mathin guys!

Great explanation Robert, thank you. 🙏

@middle-agedmacdonald2965

17 күн бұрын

What was the explanation? All I got was a lot of drawing, and then about how we should be nice to people who don't understand what they're talking about. Oh crap, that was the explanation! Sorry, you enjoy your day, and go on believing what the nice man told you. He is a very nice man, and has nothing but the best intentions. Both of those men, the one who is right, and the one who is wrong. Both very nice men.

What an easy to follow explanation. Thank you!

Thanks for itching that scratch in my brain 🧠 Robert ..

The number zero does not exist in the universe was a much more important statement in his JRE interview and all of math will be forever changed which I can theorize then our entire reality drastically changes

Thank you for your great explanation. 1 is an amazing number.

0=♾️=1 Sat-Chit-Ananda Truth/Consciousness/Love

In the instances where we deal with "Occurrence" 1*1=1. But when we are dealing with "Substance" 1*1=2. Eg 1 ball kicked once =1. (Occurrence) But 1 ball * 1 ball=2balls (Substance) so we have to have a law that relates this events and spell out what equations we are dealing with.

Thanks for clearing this up

Terrence Howard took it too far yes but $1×$1=$2 or $1² whereas $1×1=$1 this is simple... We don't scrap all of mathematics... We can make a triple table of multiplication... the problem is your addressing the mathematics from the point of view of the standard multiplication table once you understand it from the framework of how Terrence Howard presents it then you can understand how the entire thing changes. 1 is the lowest whole number thus 1×1 is important for outcome... multiplication is made to simplify addition. Terrence Howards system at least achieves addition. Our system currently is 1×1=1 this is subtractive because 1 value is lost so this obviously lets us know that we're one octave off... thus 1×1=2... this is a mathematical table for measuring units of volume like currency, gallons, liters, ect. This DOES NOT REPLACE OUR CURRENT MATHEMATICS. It's complementary to patch obvious holes... thus given the logical progression a third system can be introduced where 1×1=3 this is a truly multiplicative system.

Circle of Goodwill...

Can’t get over how handsome and intelligent he is. Love his mind but I’m not so secretly crushing.

But I thought he also said 'there are no straight lines in nature'. Is the archimedes spiral defined by straight lines, or are we 'imposing' straight lines to it?

@matthewleslie1008

18 күн бұрын

there are PLENTY of straight lines in nature. Just look at crystals.

@tcvan-nm2fx

18 күн бұрын

@@matthewleslie1008 From our perspective you are correct. I wonder if that is true at the atomic level, or quantum level.

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

18 күн бұрын

​@@tcvan-nm2fxexactly... everything is constantly changing the uncertainty principle makes it so nothing is certain therefore nothing is solid or straight add objective reality doesn't exist for in order to have objective reality you need to have an observer that exists from the beginning of time all the way to the end of time and even if such Observer does exist the End of Time hasn't came yet so therefore that Observer is subjective along with the rest of us... best we have is a shared subjective reality. Its all waves... everything is a drum.

@Silentnocturnes

17 күн бұрын

It is interesting. But all the straight lines on the computer are made up of small round dots. I wonder in nature if he is talking about how things in nature look under a microscope? Is he talking about perfectly straight lines? I can draw lines that zigzag from pint A to B so would that be considered straight lines or not A straight line bc it zigzags? These are my questions I would like answered. Is he saying there are lines but they are not perfectly straight? Does nature prove 1*1=1 or 2? Look at cell division. One cell will become 2. Cells multiply into more although we say they divide into 2 but even though we say multiply cause in our minds it means to create more. I’ll quit cause I’m starting to ramble

@tcvan-nm2fx

17 күн бұрын

@@Silentnocturnes Yes, it is easy to ramble on, but that is better than ranting. I wonder what a third dimensional straight line would look like in higher dimension. Does a mobius strip look like a straight line to an ant that is on its surface? Seems like a matter of perspective to me.

ThankQ SO MUCH for addressing this Robert - It's just strange this stuff from T.H. - I LOVE your insights into Geometry / Music / Maths

I love that Terrence looked at the flower of life acknowledging what was there and what was not there, therefore acknowledging the negative space which if you think about it, is something by. definition of your identification of it and observation of it. That is what has lead to his Linchpin which shows us how much at the quantum up to the cosmic works! In my humble layman's opinion.

I met Robert at the UFO convention in Indian Wells CA and i was profoundly touched by his knowledge. I asked him a simple question about how sacred geometry is evidence of an intelligent designer but i never knew that he knew so much about it. Wow 🤯

Thank you!

whoa caught a REG premier! Cool

Oneness Lovingness, Allness Nothingness, Foreverness Nowness, Wombness Wowness! ☺️🙏🏽☯️💗💥☀️🌳💧🌏🍇

@Acoustic-Rabbit-Hole

19 күн бұрын

You are a true poet, my friend! // Have a Wombful day!

@RichiePopsBaker

18 күн бұрын

@@Acoustic-Rabbit-Hole Thanks other me! Hee hee! Oneness Lovingness ! 😍🙏🏽☯️💗💥☀️🌳💧🌏🍇

@Acoustic-Rabbit-Hole

18 күн бұрын

@@RichiePopsBaker Ha. Richie, Come see me at _The Acoustic Rabbit Hole!_ I’m working with Robert’s new music tuning, Precise Temperament. He seems to use the same color labels fur the notes that I have always associated with.

@RichiePopsBaker

18 күн бұрын

@@Acoustic-Rabbit-Hole is there a particular video you recommend more than the others? ☺️🙏🏽☯️💗💥☀️🌳💧🌏🍇

@Acoustic-Rabbit-Hole

18 күн бұрын

​@@RichiePopsBaker “Frank Montoya Explains His Acoustification Recording Process” This one showcases Robert’s new tuning, and also shows my own work in color associations and my experimental recording processes. It’s one of the more recent videos. Also: “How I See the Color-shapes When I Play Piano.”

Thank you 🔥🔥

It times itself, which means it should go up, not the same.

Thank you Robert for you insights according to Terrence work...i was looking forward for your perspective in this subject...The Truth will set you Free!

Except he didn’t say 1x1= infinite value Whoops 🙄

Great answer. One raised to power infinity is Euler number. I have learned so much from you. Thanks for your invaluable lessons. You have any best wishes always. ❤🤝♀️👍🌿

Thank you so much!

I was listening to you before Terrance Howard. And I have nothing but respect and kind words for the work you have done and continue to do for the benefit of mankind. Can you please explain in one of your videos Terrance Howard’s 0 x 1 theory according to physics. I agree with this video but I never have understood 0x something equaling nothing,where does the “something” go?

If you read his book you can see that he actually has good explanations why he believes 1x1=2 even if it’s not true. His perspective is still valuable

Two wrongs could make a right, with this kind of logic! Yellow and yellow make green! The earth is flat, and the sky is a screen! Not necessarily, just that it could be! How deeply profound! It's almost like anything is possible? Mind blown! Thank you for your vision! I'm truly grateful for your deep insight into bs. It's profound!

1 X 1 means 1 ONE time; basically 1 ONCE.

I am really glad that he knows what he is talking about, maybe in another life it will all make sense to me. Thanks, Ken.

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

18 күн бұрын

Well if you think $1×$1=$1 then please let me "Multiply" you're money for you... Give me 2 $1 bills and i will multiply them by each other... if you're still convinced $1 * $1 equals $1 then I get to keep your other dollar and put it in my pocket and hand you back your $1 and say the multiplication is complete now you have half less then the start of the equation...

You’re both absolutely & subjectively correct… 2 is the division… replicating by dividing… when mars was ours - we would expertly draw our weapons of war & fire stars across the galaxy to strike love into the hearts of our venusian counterparts. when venus was ours - we would spin stardust into thread & make jewels of the other planets to adorn our milky breasts, enticing our mirrored mates to submit to the winds of fate. when eternity was ours - we gave it all up, for venus & mars… goddess of love & god of war, we traded the oceans of space to create a world worth living & dying for. when earth became our sacred place, we planted paradise with our offspring; ‘the human race’ - allowing true love to originate, replicating by dividing, our soul into new cells - gifting them the power to believe; heaven or hell, (their own to conceive)… somewhere we could make endless love, somewhere we would often (play) fight, a union composing all - our darkness & our light. to revel in the symphonies of our animated world, somewhere we could observe this exquisite universe the dream within the dream; our poetically charged verse… a solarium of shimmering stepping stones - l-e-a-p-i-n-g to the heart, our forever; growing home.

I see your logics. It is convincing. I am as well a creationist....I believe the octave frequency spacings tells a lot in terms of our mood tk notes and to chords relation. It speaks to our inner quantum related eneegies (feelings) we arw finally learning to respect and observe with a more scientific respecful look!! Love you edward.....

From an English Language perspective Terrence would be right. Subject verb predicate, sentence structure. 1 (subject) x (verb) 1 (predicate) = 2 Times is a verb, a function of addition. How many times we are adding the subject to the subject 1x0=1 1x1=2, (1+1) 1x2=3, (1+1+1) ... Our math model focuses on the predicate and not the subject. Times is one thing, multiplication is what we are currently doing But it has provoked a lot of conversation and questioning of our systems

I'm a dummy at maths, but you certainly made what Terence said make sense to me.. I love the golden ratio & things like that, I can do accounting to a level. But all that kinda of maths is way past me. So thank you very much 🙏🙏🙏

Was wondering what you'd say about this! The power of the infinite 1! 🙏✨Tyvm

Gracias Profe 🎉

Thank you Robert for this discussion. The réflexion on the properties of numbers such as 1 & 0. & ♾️ as well as the square root of 2 and how when applied to geometry is very enlightening. The moment space is introduced the square root appears. The moment time appears, sound and light, music and colour arrive with harmony following the square root of 2 in ratio. Beautiful!

@shawanok

15 күн бұрын

It is amazing to shift from the abstract perfection of mathematics and numbers into the chaos of creation of reality through thought, beliefs and consciousness. Infinity within the one emerging from the void or nothing, no thing, no thinking, no thought… 0, allows for creation. Nothing, Never, Nowhere… are what art creates beauty from and every manifestation can be considered eternal having existed in the Akasha despite its impermanence.

@shawanok

15 күн бұрын

Cycles of exploration and experience!

Multiplication is shorthand for addition. If you have one apple you set it down on the table one time, it remains, still, one apple.

Did people forget that we can multiply by fractions to get a number smaller than 1…. 🤔

Thank u Robert! 🙏 Love ❤️ u so much.😊

I didn't think of it messing with the square root of 2, or how it would effect other parts of mathematics. I guess the problem in thinking occurs from compartmentalizing that one problem too much. Thanks for showing your work.

Terrence Howard needs more people around him who arent afraid to question him, yes men arent conducive to anything but ego.

If you actually listen to the statement made by T. Howard he stated that" 1×1= at least 2" so in my understanding from this explanation 1x1= an infinite value either negative or positive not 1 also, does 1x1=1 create a descripancy with the law of conservation?

Please turn phone sideways next time. Thank you for taking the time to explain this thoroughly.

Robert, from Bruce Lee's book Striking Thought: "Do not be anchored to one view. - Having the totality means capable of following with what is, because what is IS constantly moving and constantly changing, and if one is anchored down to one partialized view, one sill not be able to follow the swift movement of what is."

Grateful

Thank you 😊 I just love ❤️ you and your beautiful brain ❤

I like to be open to the possibility that there’s room for all of it to be true. Just like I believe we’re multidimensional beings, it makes sense to me that we could have multidimensional aspects of science and the universe.

Have you posted this video on your Facebook page?

Greetings from Aotearoa New Zealand ❤

10:45 Please Plichterate with the square root of -1…

Awesome explaination! wish your my teacher at school might have learned a lot more in maths

Intuitively Robert I see you getting younger with age…loving Orion 🌀

1 . That we are. Understood.

The square root of 2 = 1, before the creation fractals began. Just a thought that’s way above my pay grade. ❤

@ShifuCareaga

19 күн бұрын

Nope

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

18 күн бұрын

​@@ShifuCareagaWell if you think $1×$1=$1 then please let me "Multiply" you're money for you... Give me 2 $1 bills and i will multiply them by each other... if you're still convinced $1 * $1 equals $1 then I get to keep your other dollar and put it in my pocket and hand you back your $1 and say the multiplication is complete now you have half less then the start of the equation...

Thank you sir

Beautiful ❤ and Brilliant

If 1x1=2 then 9x1=10

1x0=1 maybe

@ShifuCareaga

19 күн бұрын

Nope

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

18 күн бұрын

​@@ShifuCareaga $1×$0=$0 you say? If so give me a dollar and like a magician I will make it disappear by "multiplying" it in value... except i only "multiply" it by nothing... ok so you're cool with me "Multiplying" it by nothing which then makes you're dollar disappear into my pocket... MATH! Lol 😂

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

18 күн бұрын

Completely correct @Caliiwood67

This was really awesome, and very much appreciated as the Spiral made more apparent where Mr. Howard was basing his argument. In teaching fundamental math to kids, an argument against 1x1=2 is far more rudimentary, based on a definition of multiplication in reference to movement along the number line...addition is counting forward on a number line... multiplication is moving forward in groups. Ie: one group of one is ONE...two groups of one would be TWO. It's wonderful to have challenges to our thinking, as it's clear throughout history that our understanding has been limited sometimes by the tools we use to observe, sometimes by our own rigid mental constructs. It's also very good to be precise in our definition of terms, which is where this was so easy in teaching the difference between ADDING 1 to 1, resulting in two, versus multiple groups ( or in this case only a single group containing one unit...which is 1) Love the debate, though!! 🎉 Thank you so much for this insight.

The Joe Rogan Experience needs a polymath next. 🙏🏼