have a video coming out right away explaining everything that happened.

@pault.9266

Жыл бұрын

Yesss! You're back. Welcome back, you've been missed!

@durandalbbcom

Жыл бұрын

so glad you're back! holy shit, that was nerve wracking seeing you disappear like that. Can't wait to hear the whole story.

@LexAnarchy

Жыл бұрын

So good to see you back again it was really scary seeing your channel disappear just like that. Glad you got it back.

@morrius0757

Жыл бұрын

Welcome back Demo!

@Rook986

Жыл бұрын

Glad you're back and everything seems restored!

I'm glad that you just phased out and weren't exiled. Your channel is an asset and a wealth of knowledge.

@vDeadbolt

Жыл бұрын

MAGIC!!!!! MAGIC IS A CARD GAME!!!! WOOOO!

Another specific interaction to make note of with Raphael is the fact that _tokens are not "cards"._ So if you're making Devil tokens and sacrificing them to something like Goblin Bombardment on opponents' turns, the tokens dying will _not_ trigger Raphael to make a new Devil token.

Glad you were able to get your channel back. I hope it wasn't too much of a stress, things like that can be very worrying especially when thing like your income are involved.

Finally someone talking about Negan and it was a needed tip too! I had to learn this one the hard way but glad to see I'm not the only one who thought to try and run Teysa with Negan

This is fascinating. Please, make more of these.

Interesting upside with Pyrexian Altar and Ashnod's Altar. Them being mana abilities means you can activate them even with Split Second Spells on the stack. I did this with my Sac deck on more then one occasion when Krosan Grip was still a staple in the format.

I saw Obeka and immediately got scared, please let it be nothing I did. edit: Hell yeah, didn't mess up. It's also why I go out of my way to say "_____, ______, and _______ go on the stack, in response I tap Obeka". Also is a good reason to keep discontinuity and disallow in there to deal with potentially being forced to end your turn early and needing to counter a triggered or activated ability that goes off next end step or end an opponent's turn in response.

Glad to see you back!

Glad you're getting everything sorted. Been watching your content since I started Mtg.

Great to have you back ! Was scared the channel might’ve been terminated or something

@dpv007

Жыл бұрын

It was terminated for a little bit after the cripto-garbage/Elon-worshiping spam.

So glad to see you back! Your videos are a godsend for a newb like me!

Great video!!! I honestly didn't know about moonsilver key and the altar's interaction!

Tokens created under an opponent's control used to be owned by the player whose effects created them, which used to allow you to cast Brand to regain control of tokens made by the Hunted cycle

So glad to see you back man. 😊👍

Came here seeking knowledge for Obeka. Sir you have made the ruling more clear than anyone else has said. Thankyou and good day to you, liked and subbed.

Happy to see your videos back

Glad to see you got your channel back, Demo!

Welcome back Demo!

Glad you're back! ☺️

LFG YOU ARE BAAACKKK!!!!! CONGRATS MAN

"Card" on compost is sneaky. Good catch. Just realised today tokens don't trigger Overburden for the same reason. Going into my Uro landfall deck!

The DarrylxCompost scenario also applies to Raphael in that he cared about creature cards, so you can't just keep sacrificing the devil token to trigger Raphael

You’re back!!!! We missed u bro!!!

I can't tell you how many times I groaned in this video. Not because I disagree or anything, but because of how right you are and how I wish you weren't-I wish most of these worked. Great vid.

Love this video! Do more of these

Thank you for your service, sir.

Thank god your back

Got some changes to do to Obeka, thanks for helping understand this weird commander! ❤

@TopLevelJiuJitsu

Жыл бұрын

Once you get her down, she's one of the most fun commanders in the game. Have fun!

Im glad that bit about tokens not being considered cards was there, because I had to learn that rule the hard way with another card that has a similar non-interaction in The Haunt of Hightower. Its easy to think tokens count for those effects when you've played knowing the ruling that tokens interact with the graveyard before they disappear, but I think the ruling that they're technically not cards goes a bit unnoticed, especially since official token cards exist and are widely used. The misunderstanding is reasonable.

Do love these videoz help a lot you The man ! 🤘🏻

He's back!!

In addition to the sacrifice and dieing you can add creature card put into graveyard as an interesting distinction. There are some cool interactions like if there is a board wipe cards that die also will see other cards die. But cards that see creature cards into graveyard won't see those if it dies also.

Welcome back!

The Raphael thing is something called an "intervening if" triggered ability. It has the form "When/whenever/at CONDITION 1, if CONDITION 2, EFFECT." The ability doesn't go on the stack unless BOTH conditions are met. If both conditions are met, it goes on the stack, then as it resolves, CONDITION 2 is checked again, and if that condition is no longer true the ability resolves to no effect.

Another one is Myriad Landscape in colorless decks. Because it specifies that you grab two lands that share a land type, you actually can't grab Wastes with it because Wastes doesn't have a land type. It's just a basic land, whereas a Mountain or Island or something will have the Mountain or Island subtype and therefore can get grabbed with Myriad Landscape.

For other listeners: Negan and Teysa: Negan looks at the player's action (sacrifice a creature), and Teysa looks at the creature's action (dying). Volo: the token is created by a game rule, not an effect. This is different from Bramble Sovereign or Krenko, Mob Boss or Hordeling Outburst, which are permanents or spells (effects) that make tokens.

2:50 Notable. The token thing used to be different and it used to work that way, but t was to easily abusable so they changed it

If people want a card that does interact with Volo, Twinning Staff is a great choice. It's activated ability only works with Instants and Sorceries, but the triggered ability that grants additional copies doesn't care about the card type, just that a copy was made. It does some solid work in my Magus Lucea Kane deck, especially since it doubles each of her triggers if you tap/untap her multiple times.

Sir, you about gave me a heart attack with Feldon. I have Sundial of the Infinite and I was worried about the interaction similar to Obeka. But now I know as long as I use it to remove the delayed trigger from feldon its all good. Thanks!

You may want to read parallel live it say if an effect would put one or more tokens onto the battlefield put twice that many on the battlefield instead. Nothing about them needing to be created like doubling season.

@edhdeckbuilding

Жыл бұрын

always read the updated errata. "If an effect would create one or more tokens under your control, it creates twice that many of those tokens instead."

great content

Fun fact, the Zedru token trick actually did work at one point, the classic trick was something like Hunted Dragon plus Brand.

Yeah, noting a previous video, I had to kick Teleportation Circle and Far Traveler from my Lulu//Veteran Soldier vehicles deck in favor of a Synod Sanctum and a Stonecloaker, due to Lulu being particular about the end step. I'm planning on possibly swapping in Prowl and some other recent mono-white vehicles matter legends to the 98.

Thank god he is back

Sorry you're still hacked...🙁

@helderboymh

Жыл бұрын

Ahh so he was, a while back I was trying to find this channel and couldn't

Reminds me of a rules interaction that's now defunct I could never find a definitive answer to. Commanders going back to the command zone used to be a replacement effect, which meant that O-ring style effects that exiled them until they left the battlefield still let them come back if they weren't recast first. The part I could never find an official statement for from a judge on the internet was that Guile uses similar phrasing, which implied that countering your opponents commanders would allow you to steal them regardless of the fact that they would choose to put them back in the command zone instead of exile. It's a moot point now because they've since changed the action of putting the commander into the command zone to a state based effect in order to solve the confusion over when a commander is considered to have died. The commander now hits the intended zone first, then can be moved to the command zone when state based effects are checked, so now any effects that were following an instant of the commander into a public zone lose track of it because it changes zones after said effect resolves.

Happy to see my notes made it into the video, sorry to hear you ran into some trouble. I hope all is sorted soon.

pretty sure the Rapheal effect would trigger with sneak attack, since you could simply choose to have the sacrifice happen first on the stack. let me know if I'm wrong though, but I'm pretty sure multiple end step triggers controlled by the same player allow them to choose the timing in which they trigger. Apparently im wrong because for his effect to trigger, something needed to die BEFORE the end step, not during. parallel lives though doesnt use create, it says put, and a token entering the battlefield from the commander would trigger it i believe.

One thing about obeka, not sure if you talked about it in another vid is, that card like ball lightning don't work. You can put off their trigger for a turn but it will happen on your opponent's next end step.

9:01 Walker tokens are defined as 2/2 black zombie creature tokens with the name 'Walker'. It absolutely does work with composting.

@canadianguy1578

Жыл бұрын

Wait nevermind... Compost was one of those older cards that specify nontoken.

@edhdeckbuilding

Жыл бұрын

it actually specifies "card".

Thanks Demo!

I put doubling season in my Tawnos deck knowing that it didn’t work with him because I have cards that either create a token of a creature you control (eg. Quasiduplicate) or create a token for each token (eg. Parallel Evolution).

One of the things i like is that you stress that they can have these cards in for other reasons besides straight synergy with their commanders. Where as most content creators resort to straight up belittling the choices of others.

Parallel Lives should work it says "If an effect would put one or more tokens onto the battlefield under your control, it puts twice that many of those tokens onto the battlefield instead"

@edhdeckbuilding

Жыл бұрын

it doesn't work. trust me.

@D3ATHPROOFXBL

Жыл бұрын

Yes it works because it doesnt Says create

@edhdeckbuilding

Жыл бұрын

@@D3ATHPROOFXBL always read errata text

@OverlyCriticalAnime

Жыл бұрын

@@D3ATHPROOFXBL They just updated not to long ago

Soundwave had the weirdest boarding for me. You exiled the card in the opponents library and copy the card, then cast it for free so twinning staff doesn’t work with it but at first glance, I totally thought twinning staff worked with it.

Could you talk about how multiplicative/additive abilities for tokens and counters might be calculated? (for example Doubling Season and Anointed Procession on the field at the same time) I feel like there's always some confusion about how many tokens or counters somebody might have when there are different cards with different rules texts that say "when you create a token, create an additional token" or "when you create a token, create that many more" and then they get an additional token because the other permanent checks that creation.

I’m confused about the Ranar, the Ever-Watchful and Rest In Peace/Samurai of the Pale Mist interaction. I understand that Ranar got irata’d but I would think that since the subject in the ability text that matters in both RIP and SPM is an understood “you”, Ranar would still make spirits even if an opponent was to board wipe or use spot removal. I understand why it doesn’t work anymore with Altar of Dementia as a combo, but I think people are still putting that in their Ranar decks so that’s also something to talk about if you want.

I've been thinking of putting some of the cards with Initiative in my Yarok deck but I'm not sure they work how I want them to. If a permanent's etb gives me the Initiative and that triggers twice do I get to go into two rooms of the Undercity?

I do not know if it is footing in the theme But with the deck heads I win tails you lose received by many the interaction between winning a flip and leak thumb could be interesting to talk about Maybe a quick take?

Even though these rulings are probably true there are a lot of heated fighting words in this particular video. The created token and sacrifice effect not triggering dying trigger rules specifically I know would cause a fight at my LGS given how people use their decks and feel like they are Judges and master of Magic Rules.

Daryl is a cedh commander a lot and compost is prolly on the list for that more so then his interaction

You guys have any suggestions for a Ramos, Dragon 🐉 Engine deck? I struggle to stay alive against aggressive decks. My current build has a ton of charms and is tailored towards a mazes wincon.

You're killing me smalls

The Chandra could be used against those players whom own ghyrson tho and then they'd be taking 2 dmg XD.

A suggestion for another video: Horn of Greed doesn't trigger off of effects that put lands into play, e.g. Rampant Growth.

DEMO YOU MADE IT BACK YES!!!

Question, since you can stack ur triggers however u want on the end step can you set it so that the creature would die on the end step then the other guy would trigger after that since the conditions have been met?

@nightcrawlermtg

Жыл бұрын

If no creature has been put into your graveyard during your turn, then Raphael won't trigger at all at the beginning of your end step. Only the Sneak Attack will trigger and you'll sacrifice the creature. The Raphael won't trigger in response to that because the "beginning of the end step" has already happened.

I was playing a game against a guy that believed the text on hinata gave him the ability to target as many things as he wanted with his spells. He was very pissed when I judge called him and he walked out. He tried to say his lightning bolt targeted every creature.

Myriad landscape in colorless decks can only one wastes, which is another thing many people get wrong

So I assume the parallel lives wouldn't work with anything that is copying and making tokens right? So Magus Lucea Kane wouldn't cause parallel lives to trigger right?

Dissagree on the Raphael and Sneak Attack example. Both are your triggers, you can order them as you please. you decide Sneak attack triggers first, this causes Raphael's check which triggers later to find a creature that was put in graveyard this turn.

@josiahkendall4492

Жыл бұрын

Your close, but Rachael's trigger checks if a creature has died before it can go to the stack, if one hasn't already then it can't go. So, you can't arrange it behind sneak attack because it isn't on the stack. Totally right able choosing order of simultaneous triggered effects tho.

Does Flamrush Rider and Wings of Hubris work in a Obeka Deck?

With Araumi of the dead tide, if you are able to keep the encore tokens it makes (through a sundial or obeka type of effect or similar), are those tokens still required to attack a different one of your opponents on following turns?

@jaysillynx3190

Жыл бұрын

No, they only have to do this the turn they are created.

12:26 Tawnos is really cool with mutate cards 😅

I’m having trouble with Miirym, Sentinel Wyrm and Mirrorwing Dragon. If you were to blink mirror wing dragon with a targeted blink spell, that would blink all other creatures I control. But would that allow Miirym to copy each one or is Miirym not around to see it when they all re enter the battlefield. Thanks!

@alexandergartner8877

Жыл бұрын

Miirym sees all creatures that enter simultaneously with him. Every creature sees simultaneously entering creatures. That's how the Rite of Replication combo with Terror of the Peaks/Scourge of Valkas/Be'lakor/Gruul Omnath works. Edit: On the other hand, if you blink Mirrorwing Dragon and every other creature you control, you'll lose all your existing creature tokens. They'll be blinked, too, and they can't come back from exile. You also can't attach auras to simultaneously entering creatures. You have to attach auras to creatures that are already on the battlefield.

My understanding of end step triggers were that I as the player with priority get to stack my triggers as I please. If I can sac a creature on the stack before Raphael's end step trigger, it'll allow him to create the token. I just want to check and make sure that's incorrect, because if so, I'll have to reevaluate how I've been doing some end step shenanigans lol

@edhdeckbuilding

Жыл бұрын

so that is incorrect. yes you can stack the triggers however you like but your raphael won't even trigger at all if a creature didn't hit the graveyard yet.

@jaysillynx3190

Жыл бұрын

Raphael has what is called an "intervening if" in his trigger wording ("if a creature card was put into your graveyard from anywhere this turn..."), meaning that for Raphael to even put his trigger on the stack in the first place, that condition needs to be met by the time you move into your endstep. If this is not the case then there is no stacking to be done because only the Sneak attack trigger will be put on the stack (assuming no other triggers happen)

Hello guys, is this the video demo mentions as his most important one yet in the “my channel was hacked” video? One he wants us to share?

With the Obeka end of turn in response activation. Do you have to keep reactivating it on your next turn or is that permanent never going to look to sacrifice itself ever again?

@edhdeckbuilding

Жыл бұрын

no the trigger will only go to the stack once. after you deal with it the first time it will be gone for good.

to be fair to the zedruu mistake, that is the way it used to work, then they changed how it worked, then they changed the wording to make it intuitive

So here's one for a parallel lives ruling. On a card like Howl of the night pack it says put instead of create. Is that just old wording or does it not work with parallel lives also?

@jaysillynx3190

Жыл бұрын

Anything that says "put a token into play" has been reworded to "create". For these cards, you can simply look up the updated text on Gatherer or Scryfall if you are unsure

2:35 - This is funny. Token ownership changed with the Magic 2010 rules changes; prior to that, whoever's spell/card/effect created the token was considered the owner, even if they created it under an opponent's control. The interesting part, though, is that Zedruu was released in 2011, so at no time could Zedruu ever interact in that way with tokens not created under your own control. I wonder if it's just a bunch of people who never noticed the rules change 13+ years ago.

Okay, I’m kinda confused. Specifically about the Raphael and Sneak Attack combo. I thought one could choose the order of triggers, so since they both say “at the beginning of your end step…,” can’t you decide to trigger sneak attack first, that way Raphael sees the creature enter the battlefield since that sneak attack will resolve first, therefore, Raphael will create a devil token. I’m not very familiar with either cards, so any insight would be helpful! 😊

@toewoe

Жыл бұрын

So it's a little bit weird, but what happens is both effects trigger at the same time. Raphael looks to see if his trigger occurs, and sneak attack sacrifices the creature. You can choose the order in which you do those actions, however, at the time of Raphael searching, there was nothing to find. They are not activated abilities responding to each other, nor are they triggering each other, so the easiest way to look at it in my opinion is that they are each in their own separate stack.

@nightcrawlermtg

Жыл бұрын

If no creature has been put into your graveyard during your turn, then Raphael won't trigger at all at the beginning of your end step. Only the Sneak Attack will trigger and you'll sacrifice the creature.

Hmmm….How would Rakdos Lord of Riots and Walking Ballista interact? Im curious if the effects go through.

@icespectre5982

Жыл бұрын

@@shadowfate05 cool. Ig i just got to rack up the dmg and bring it back to hand after im done using walking ballista. Then repeat the cycle

Are Walker tokens even considered Black? Usually the token generators denote the colors of the tokens created. It's weird Daryl's card does not right?

In theory, Ghyrson Starn would work if you also exchanged control of him to the opponent with the emblems. Ghyrsons ability is not optional and does not specify "opponent", so their emblems dealing damage to themselves would trigger him if they also owned Ghyrson himself. Exchanging control during upkeeps or even permanently would be effective, and if the opposing deck doesn't have any 1/1's or 1 tick burns and triggers there's no downside to this other than giving your opponent a 3/2 that kills them faster.

@Edh Deckbuilding, would you mind addressing the interaction between the enchantnents 'Lethal Vapors' (pay 0 activated ability) and 'Karmic Justice'

@ericashmead4049

Жыл бұрын

Pretty much the question comes down to who owns the 'activated ability' on cards that read 'any player may play this ability', is it the controller of the card which enables the ability? Or the player who activated the ability?

@edhdeckbuilding

Жыл бұрын

no interaction at all. it's your ability, you control it, even though other players can activate it.

@jaysillynx3190

Жыл бұрын

@@edhdeckbuilding That is not correct. The controller of an activated ability is the player that activated it, no matter who controls the permanent the ability was on. (602.2a) If you control both Lethal Vapors and Karmic Justice and an opponent activated Lethal Vapor's 0 mana ability to destroy it, Karmic Justice would indeed trigger. This is not to be confused with Lethal Vapor's triggered ability. Those are indeed controlled by the controller of the permanent, however they don't really matter for this interaction since Justice only looks at noncreatures being destroyed.

@jaysillynx3190

Жыл бұрын

@@ericashmead4049 The controller of an ability is the player that activated it.

@ericashmead4049

Жыл бұрын

@@jaysillynx3190 Thanks for clarification, when I was looking at the rules I think I was looking around the wrong section and it wasnt very clear, mustve been how I was wording it in the search bar. Kind regards

When we first started playing (12y ago) we believed that you needed to pay the mana cost each turn for a creature to keep them on the BF. The other, we believed that "Regenerate" brought creatures from the GY to the BF.

3:28 so this means if the player who gave the emblem to their opponents and then dies, those emblems stay around till the end of the game, correct?

@fallendeus5641

Жыл бұрын

Yes, Emblems do not go away once opponents are given emblems unless they are no longer in the game. To quote the exact ruling from gatherer. "If you leave a multiplayer game, your opponents keep any emblems Chandra gave them. Each opponent owns the emblem Chandra gives them. In multiplayer, your opponents continue to burn after you and Chandra leave the game."

@CrazyRampage

Жыл бұрын

@@fallendeus5641 sweet, ty

I still can't believe 26% of people with Kyler, Sigardian Emissary decks are playing Mentor of the Meek, you're maybe going to get up to 2 draws out of it and that's it. Soon as you have Kyler on the board with 2 counters on him, all the creatures you have entering the battlefield are 3/3s or more and Mentor becomes a dead card. Any draw card would be better than Mentor, Cloaked Cadet would be better than it.

Could you do one on Chun-li, countless kicks and twinning staff?

@edhdeckbuilding

Жыл бұрын

wow that's a sneaky one.

For raphael and endstep triggers, can you not order your beginning of end step triggers to get the token?

@toewoe

Жыл бұрын

The effects are not responding to each other, they happen independently. Because of that, Raphael is looking at the board before sneak attack triggers, even if you chose to do it first. Think of it as 2 separate stacks

@alexandergartner8877

Жыл бұрын

On the beginning of the end step you check both Raphael and Sneak Attack. Since no creature died until then, only the Sneak Attack trigger will go on the stack. For Raphael to be triggered at all, the Sneak Attack Trigger would actually have already been resolved at the beginning of the end step. Which of course it hasn't.

I thought that if a card is exiled instead of going to the graveyard, sacrifice activated abilities do not trigger. I was told that rest in peace can shut down a Kykar for example.

@jaysillynx3190

Жыл бұрын

That is incorrect. For one, triggers that look for "Whenever a creature is sacrificed" don't care about where the creature ends up in the end. It merely cares about a player taking the action of sacrificng a creature. Kykar doesn't care about Rest in Peace either. You can still activate abilities that require you to sacrifice creatures with a RIP type effect on the board, again because those cards don't care about where the sacrificed permanent ends up, only that you took the action of sacrificing something. For Kykar to be blocked, you'd need something that prevents players from sacrificing stuff, for example Yasharn, Implacable Earth or Angel of Jubilation.

@GONZUdAce11

Жыл бұрын

@@jaysillynx3190 thanks, Woooow My kykar just became a lot more powerfull

Leyline of the void will trigger if it is token creature, because tokens are not cards. Another confusing layer

I have a interactions question when it comes to the Card Master transmuter it involves returning an artifact to your hand and then you can put one into play from your hand the question is are you able to play the card from your hand that you returned to your hand with her ability

@edhdeckbuilding

Жыл бұрын

yes. returning is part of the activation.

@tooltechtv6130

Жыл бұрын

@@edhdeckbuilding ok cool se people where saying the card was on the stack so it wasn't apart of your hand yet

@josiahkendall4492

Жыл бұрын

@@tooltechtv6130 Pay special attention to ":" in magic cards, it separates payment from effect. All payments have to completly resolve before effects start happening. Bonus fact--> Your awesome.

Also a question for anyone that might know. Activated and triggered abilities that name a particular card. (eg: Firkraag, cunning instigator/ Jenara, Asura of war) how do they work with copies of themselves of the battle field. Do all affects get allotted to one card or to each? Sorry its sounds silly but I can't find any official rulings in this regard on Named Cards abilities.

@fallendeus5641

Жыл бұрын

How abilities like that work is that each card only affects itself. A good rule of thumb that helps cut confusion on stuff like that is whenever a card names itself you can replace the name of the card in the ability section and replace it with "this object". I will post the relevant rule below. 201.4 Text that refers to the object it’s on by name means just that particular object and not any other objects with that name, regardless of any name changes caused by game effects.

@contentmatt7133

Жыл бұрын

@@fallendeus5641 awesome thank you! I really appreciate you clearing that up for me. That does help clear up an encounter my group had regarding Firkraag and clone. 😁👍

@fallendeus5641

Жыл бұрын

@@contentmatt7133 No problem, i remember that kind of thing when i first started playing and trying to learn all the rules to the game.

11:05, about the wording being very specific... WHERE Parallel Lives has a written word "create"? PUT and CREATE are different effects

@Dynme

Жыл бұрын

In the oracle text, which is the definitive rules text for the card.

Sneak attack could still be used to trigger Raphael it just wouldn’t be using sneak attack to its full potential because yo I could activate it on opponents’ turns to get the Raphael trigger on opponents’ turns.

@Dynme

Жыл бұрын

No, that still wouldn't work.

@douglasha6027

Жыл бұрын

@@Dynme u right

Negan player here, you don't want Teysa Karlov for Negan specifically but is great within Negan decks. She is important for certain cards such as getting Grave Pact, Dictate of Erebos, Butcher of Malakir, etc to trigger from seeing the deaths or sacrificing of your own creatures. Many sacrifice spells require all players to sacrifice a creature(s), and some creatures sacrifice your own for treasures, such as Ruthless Technomancer.

@brendans1983

Жыл бұрын

Not sure why you would wanna be sacrificing your own creatures in Negan. Except Fleshbag and his 2 mates. But that's not worth putting Teysa, Grave Pact, Dictate and Butcher in your deck for. If ur running Teysa because of Grave Pact effects and Fleshbag effects, I feel you should just build Teysa. Swap out Grave Pact and his mates for instants and sorceries that just make people have to sac. You don't want to create a situation where noone wants to cast creatures because of a Dictate/GP lock, inevitably u lose that enchantment before people cast more creatures. And Negan only wins with people casting creatures. It frees up more slots in your deck for cards that interact with treasures too.

You are right about the Chandra interaction it doesn't work - but discussing semantics I think its not because they own it. Emblems exist outside the game and are uninteractable and therefore aren't owned by anyone technically. Very cool video though! Love the specifics of magics and the interactions.

@richardadams7667

Жыл бұрын

So they are owned. Otherwise, "creatures you control..." wouldn't do anything. But they aren't permanents, which IS interesting.

@Tuckanuckle

Жыл бұрын

@@richardadams7667 They are assigned to a player but i don't believe they own it at all. You don't have to own a permanent for it to affect you. The emblem is just on you but nobody owns it as far as I understand

@Synavis

Жыл бұрын

From the rulings: 114.2. An effect that creates an emblem is written “[Player] gets an emblem with [ability].” This means that [player] puts an emblem with [ability] into the command zone. The emblem is both owned and controlled by that player.

@Tuckanuckle

Жыл бұрын

@@Synavis Thank you for a clear explaination! :D good to learn thank you!