For me, the aged condition of the tapes actually adds something to the movie. Horror movies are a big step scarier and creepier with degraded audio and video. Makes it harder to see who's coming out to get you! Aged tapes have personality.

@mikemiceli2419

2 жыл бұрын

Couldn't agree more

I collect them for the PACKAGE ART (its often good) mainly. I also do love the old LOGOS, but THOSE can be seen right here on KZread today.

The best way to watch a 70-80's horror is on VHS....insane with the grain!

I prefer VHS over DVD. Tapes last a lot longer than any disc, and I love the analog nostalgic quality. I really love living back in time too.

@Flux799

5 жыл бұрын

geo58impala same here

@ktee1403

5 жыл бұрын

Remembers where you left off 5 years ago too!

@BRIGHTJUS

3 жыл бұрын

WORD

I like to watch VHS sometimes because i like the old picture, colours and Sound. Some of the new movie quality is so perfect that it is boring.

I gave away about 100 VHS tapes about 10 years ago. Wish I would have hung on to them. Collecting VHS tapes seems like a cool hobby. The artwork is awesome compared to many DVD/ BD releases - especially on the old "big boxes"

@BRIGHTJUS

3 жыл бұрын

EXACTLY

@BRIGHTJUS

3 жыл бұрын

The ARTWORK NOW ON DVD AND BLUE RAYZ ARE SHIT

Really enjoyed this video, Paul. I've come back to it several times. Would love to see more vlogs in this style in the future!

5:55 Sorry you are completely wrong when it comes to vinyl records. A clean, well-kept (or new) vinyl doesn't pop or crackle. In terms of quality it's rather comparable to a 35mm film print rather than a vhs. It's simply two different things, I understand why people collect vhs, but with vinyl it's indeed the phenomenal sound quality they deliver.

@BRIGHTJUS

3 жыл бұрын

WORD DEFINITELY WRONG HE OBVIOUSLY NEVER USED A VINYL RECORD

New to your channel but LOVE your content and your reasons for collecting VHS are spot on. Looking forward to binge watching! lol - xx Amy

Amen, brother. I'm exactly the same way. Yeah, I have a lot of nostalgic affection for the vhs format itself, and there are some flicks I do prefer to watch on tape over other formats (namely direct-to-video and other titles which seem intrinsically linked to the format and era). But mainly I collect vhs because I collect films and simply do not eschew outdated formats.

Great and honest video, Paul. It's the same reason I collect old jazz 78's (as well as vinyl, CD's, VHS, DVD's, and Blu-rays) because I see 78's as historical artifacts that existed in the lifetimes of the original jazz artists. It's not as if 78's offer the best sound possible (no way!) which is why I also have better remastered cleaned up jazz albums on CD. I enjoy the historical novelty of VHS (I never tossed out the VHS movies I collected in the 80's and 90's), but if I can find movies for much less on DVD or Blu-ray in widescreen with extra features, then I'll scoop them up every single time over a VHS version.

I agree up to a point. I think you can do both. Some people think it's an either/or proposition. I love blu rays and have a ton of them, and it's amazing what they are doing with restoring all these old movies. With that said, I think there's a feel and an atmosphere to VHS tape that is unique and fun that you can't get anyplace else. VHS are beer and blu rays are brandy. Brandy is certainly finer quality but sometimes you want beer for its unique flavor. There certainly are choice titles that I want on blu ray that are my all time favorites I want a clean copy of for posterity. On the other hand I do not have to own absolutely everything on blu ray. Another thing you have to think about too is that with all these new 2K and 4K scans, now the DVDs are looking almost as good as the blus! Look at a Vinegar Syndrome DVD/blu combo pack. There's hardly any difference. I don't know exactly how old you are but I remember seeing movies in the theater in the 1970s, the prints were really beat up sometimes. And I love old beat up prints. They did not look like blu rays in the theater, never did. It was the size of the picture and large sound system that made the difference, and nobody has all that in their living room obviously. The whole "as the director originally intended" thing seems kind of silly to me because after TV came about in the 1950s the director knew it would later be shown on TV too, and was probably quite glad when it did. It wasn't considered a problem. As far as records go , I have a 1950s record player with tubes and a single speaker that can blow any huge modern sound system away tone wise. I love the Doors too! And I think my Doors records have a better tone on records. But that depends a lot on your own personal set up. CDs always sounded flat to me and never had the deep dynamic punch you in the gut records had. You might as well just pull up KZread through your blu ray machine and play a song through your TV that way, it's gonna sound the same as a CD.

@vhscollector

6 жыл бұрын

I wasn't around in the 70's, so I envy that you've been able to see many of these films when they were fresh. However, I have seen some revival screenings on film and sure, many are a mess. I guess my point was that no director makes a movie intending it to look that way. It just the nature of the business - a print floats around the country, playing in multiple cinemas multiple times a day. Thats just wear and tear. Sure, the director is aware that it could happen, but if they had the option to prevent that, do you think they would've taken it? I'd imagine so. The whole reason they chose to shoot 35 over 16 is because it was a huge improvement over the latter. Therefore, they invested the extra bucks for a better theatrical experience. Shooting in 16 or even video was usually a last resort. I'll admit, I'm not a music aficionado. So I'm not going to speak on the topic with too much authority, but I have listened to records (mainly the Doors :P), and its an interesting experience to hear the music as it was heard during the era and I can appreciate that. But my go to option would still be a clean version. Like I said, there's a time and a place for everything, but personally VHS and records are just not my first options. Always great to meet a fellow Doors fan!

@SneakyNinjaToad

6 жыл бұрын

The Analog Archivist you keep going on about what was intended and clean but no live performance sounds clean like a cd

@fuckenps3

6 жыл бұрын

KZread and CD are not equivalent, like, at all. Audio compression, hello. I mean the saving of bits, and not volume compression when I say that btw. CD is uncompressed even if the master is sometimes brickwalled. Speaking of which... Doing a separate mastering for vinyl can sometimes improve the dynamics in a way that isn't present on the CD, but that's a case-by-case basis. @Toad XY, but what was the artist's intention in the studio, to get something clean and rich to last forever or something dirty and authentic like a live performance? Because some bands will change how they record depending on the mood they're going for and Analog Archivist's point still stands in that case about artist intent.

@johnnybenavidez5486

6 жыл бұрын

facts

@creepyskulldini581

5 жыл бұрын

I often get vhs tapes and laser discs just because I like the package artwork and graphics - sometimes they're really good. I also like allot of those old logos they'd have at the beginning, THOSE are available right here on KZread today of course, so there's no reason to buy them to get those.

I agree about theatrical releases being viewed on a format that exposes all the film grain. If it was filmed on video, then I prefer to watch it on video, as the director intended. I don’t think it translates as well to other formats, and as you said, if it was made within the vhs boom era, I would assume the director envisioned the movie to be viewed on the vhs format, ultimately. Also, with some made for tv movies, there were a lot of them, not necessarily made for video, but were made to be viewed on tv when just about every tv was 4:3 aspect ratio, so those are also in that pool of movies which i find acceptable to watch on vhs and never need to upgrade when its rereleased on bd. But as you mentioned, this is the exception. Great upload. 👍🏻

@vhscollector

6 жыл бұрын

Exactly. I think it goes without saying that if a film was shot on video, it was intended for video. But I think its worth adding that this is only because of the limits of the technology at the time. Had these filmmakers had other options to release their films in a higher quality, then I'd imagine they would do so (if it were financially feasible). Of course, there are some directors at the time who didn't care a less, and replaced their film elements with video masters... a real shame. But these same directors are kicking themselves for it today. They did not foresee a future of home video in HD. Also, as a side note, some directors did shoot films with an understanding that it would be viewed in both fullscreen and widescreen, and shot to accommodate both scenarios. mainly out of necessity and to avoid a Pan and Scan situation. For instance, Kubrick. But I'd imagine he would've preferred his films to be viewed in widescreen and in a high resolution... I base this assumption on how much attention he paid to such small details, some of which weren't noticed on home video until HD hit the market. Thanks for watching and the great comment!

Digital downloads are the way to go of course, some movies I definitely want the best audio/video quality possible, but I really really enjoy the simplicity of popping in a VHS tape and not have to worry at all about skips like a DVD has. I can just sit back and relax like I did in the old days, but the old days is now. I've just started my VHS collection! ;-)

I love watching VHS more then dvd or Blu ray !!! Whaaat !

Great video Paul. What’s the holy grail of your collection? Your most prized vhs, also which is the rarest you have?

@vhscollector

6 жыл бұрын

Haha, sorry. I'm not always looking at these comments or miss some. I suppose Tales From the Quadead Zone, Mama's Home, Savage Intruder, and a few others could be considered grail items.

@dogtanion9124

6 жыл бұрын

The Analog Archivist thanks for taking the time to reply. Do you have any plans to do a live stream? I have a couple more questions.

@makaveli4205

6 жыл бұрын

He has the most rare horror vhs probably in the world.

@fuckenps3

6 жыл бұрын

Can't find Mama's Home on imdb.

@SneakyNinjaToad

6 жыл бұрын

nd4spd it's on imdb as "Captives" release year 1988

Are you selling them Im looking for Philippine Movies and Philippine Tv shows? Im here at Aliso Viejo,California.

Great video...have to say I find Vinyl on a high quality player sounds alot better than CD. I have LP'S with the same albums on CD and the warm sound on LP is superior to my CD's.

Your website search engine doesn't pull up common VHS tapes that I own.

If an album was recorded on analog equipment then it WAS intended to be listened to on an analog medium like vinyl. They weren't intended to be listened to on a digitized and compressed compact disc. CDs are like the equivalent to copying a VHS tape to a DVD

@vhscollector

6 жыл бұрын

Point taken. However, this was only because that was the limit of the technology of the time. Analog was the only option. I'd imagine if there were a superior sounding retail format, they would've preferred that. However, I can't really agree with the analogy, since a "VHS" is not a master source.

I hope you are digitally converting these things and cataloging them before the tape rot

Totally agree. I collect vhs for the historical value and nostalgia. I only watch my vhs to make sure they work after a purchase or if I cant watch the movie on dvd or blu. Plus I dont want to risk damaging them. Vhs collecting is my passion but I prefer to watch movies on dvd or blu. Just wondering is Vhscollector.com down? I just tried to go on the website earlier and it says the site can't be reached?

I often get vhs tapes and laser discs just because I like the package artwork and graphics - sometimes they're really good. I also like allot of those old logos they'd have at the beginning, THOSE are available right here on KZread today of course, so there's no reason to buy them to get those.

What book are you talking about? I'd love to have a book about VHS that focuses on horror but have not been able to find anything

Please do another horror is dead documentary they are so good.

Many people still buy vinyl records and old factory label video tapes because of the COVERS. Also, I think SOME movie that play better on full screen even though they were originally theatrical, like The Groove Tube and TunnelVision for example (two movies I've seen mentioned in other videos of yours), since THOSE movies are spoofs of television anyway.

Hi Paul. I collect vinyl as a way to support the artists I listen to. I don’t always listen to the vinyl as I don’t want to wear it out and perhaps one day it will be collectible. Some of my favorite artists are recording analog and prefer listeners use vinyl. If the vinyl is clean and newish there will be very little to no hiss or pop. Most people just don’t take very good care of records. Anyway thanks for the video. I always enjoy watching.

Did all the made VHS horror movies got converted into DVD?

I think for a movie like Blair Witch Project (a film that's supposed to look like a student film found in the middle of the woods) is best experienced on VHS. I feel like having it upgraded to HD or 720p makes the film look nicer than it should.

“Contrarian” I love that.

Do you feel that sometimes the movies get too good resolution? I sometimes think the feeling is lost. Like they forgot to put the filter on?

@vhscollector

6 жыл бұрын

For me personally, a higher resolution allows me to engulf myself further into the movie. Grain and print damage often reminds me I'm watching a movie. Watching a worn out print does have nostalgia value or it can add to the grimy nature of the film itself, but those things really don't interest me as much as the content of the film itself.

@kstarter

6 жыл бұрын

Well I feel sometimes things get to real and then the feeling is totally lost, like I was watching behind the scenes of the movie. Well we're all different :)

The dislike is from a "Hipster"

u dont always get crack & pops on records, it depends on there conditiion, am a doors fan too, whats ur favourite album ?

@vhscollector

6 жыл бұрын

"The Doors" and LA Woman - their first and last, perfectly book-ending their career. Great stuff. How about you?

So do you watch your VHS editions then? Blu Ray is more expensive...sure it would be nice to have Blu Ray, but also a lot of films haven't been released on DVD or Blu Ray, so if not for VHS, those films might be lost. (Is this changing now?) Ideally, we would have 35 mm prints of every film ;)

I agree with you when it comes to movies. Especially those shot on high quality film, I mean we haven't even yet reached the "peak" when it comes to fully seeing the quality of a good film, especially those shot on larger sizes like 65mm. 4k isn't large enough to even bring out all the detail of the image for a large format like that. Recently watched the Synapse Suspiria release and it looks jaw dropping, even compared to new movies, and that's just 1080p, not even 4k. As far as music goes, that's a bit backwards? Vinyl is analog and if the music was recorded that way you're getting the full sound detail, whereas taking that recording and putting it to a cd, you usually end up with compressed audio which in turn affects the sound detail and dynamic range of the m usic. Cd's, then eventually digital (mp3, etc) was less about "sounding better" vs vinyl and more about simply being convenient. You could pop a cd into a cd player and take it with you, easily switch them out, skip to the specific song you wanted, etc. Then digital comes along and now you can literally have multiple albums all at your fingertips in a tiny little mp3 player or whatever you use. When it comes to digital sound mp3's are at the low end and are compressed to hell and back. When you play music at a low bitrate you lose detail, just like streaming a low bitrate movie, you get artifacts in the picture and the detail of sound is missing bits because of the compression. Vinyl isn't all roses though, you had degradation over time, limits to the length of songs, etc. However these days digital can be good, you can get lossless audio (IE Flac) and other things that sound great, higher quality digital releases through most streaming services, etc. The major issue with digital music (cd's included), isn't the format itself but the engineers behind mixing it. It gave rise to one of the WORST things to happen to the music industry as a whole, the "loudness wars." You can google that and have a read , it's quite fascinating and also quite sad. Basically a lot of music has the high's and low end "chopped" off (bye bye dynamic range) to make the overall song "louder."

@blib3786

2 жыл бұрын

What you said about CD is complete nonsense. CD is much higher audio quality than vinyl, has much less noise and is capable of significantly wider dynamic ranges. CD audio is also completely uncompressed, so you're not losing any information when transferring from analog like you claim (unless you mean dynamic range compression, which has everything to do with the mastering process and nothing to do with the format itself). Vinyl doesn't have any advantages over CD besides cool factor, which is a fine enough reason to prefer it over CD, but doesn't justify making up a bunch of nonsense about it's alleged "superiority" over digital like vinyl proponents tend to do.

Great video Paul 👍 I 💟 📼

I get that a lot from people too. I only prefer VHS over other formats when the DVD is changed too far from the VHS to enjoy. My goto example is Return of the Living Dead Part II, so many music and soundtrack changes. Although I will buy the upcoming Blu-Ray from Scream Factory.

Some movies deserve to be watched on VHS. Halloween (1978) is a perfect example! You can argue that watching a movie on VHS is more authentic because that’s how it was originally intended to be viewed at your own home. Where as DVD and Blu-ray are just remastered versions of the same movie hence losing it’s authenticity.

@timsmythfilmsandanimations

Жыл бұрын

You also have blu rays and dvds that are scanned from the original film negative, instead of a film print, like Halloween 1978, and we now see many details in the image that were never seen in the original theatrical run, and some not meant to be seen, as the cinematographers knew what was going to show up in the final print, and what wasn't. So is that really presenting the films as they were meant to be seen? It is certainly not presenting the films exactly as they were seen in the theaters.

good, honest vid.

I totally get your opinion. In my case I collect and totally prefer to watch VHS quality. Love the grain and low quality. It is very nostalgic to me and jus lovely, the pic is softer and voice sometimes not so good but that's the whole point to me. I do not care shit about the directors preference, only my experience. I do watch blu-ray, streaming and dvd too, though. I watch all of them. Depends on the day.

@vhscollector

2 жыл бұрын

To each their own of course. For me, I do care about the director's intention because the film wouldn't exist in the first place had it not been for their vision. I watch movies for their content, not nostalgia. But that's just me.

Stuff on VHS that's not on DVDs, Blue Rays, 4K, or streaming... 1) Some movies (like Jean Claude Van Damn movies, etc.) 2) visual/physical VHS artwork (such as on Dragon Ball Z vhs taps, on the front and sides collectively) 3) Older Trailers/prieviews/promos (such as in many movie releases/show releases such as Batman/Superman World's finest, Kids' WB/SPace Jam soundtrack previews on Space Jam, Digimon prieview on Titan AE, Fox Kids previews on Digimon the movie, etc.) 4) Paramount "We now bring you.." intros on Paramount and Nickelodeon tapes 5) Nickelodeon intros on vhs tapes (the 90's ones had the "Nick .. Nick" wackyland-esque version, as the early 2000's ones had the two kids running through an orange maze). 6) Certain footage (Star Wars, etc.) 7) Certain audio dubs, etc. that's on very few dvds (Dragon Ball Z) 8) etc.

I collect VHS for the same reason as you but I also watch all the VHS I buy are you the same?

First! Good video my man!

If you’re hearing a ton of pops and cracks then your set up isn’t very good, and your records are dirty. That or the pressing sucks. Cd’s and records are mastered for differently, and have different dynamic range. When older albums started ending up on cd’s, lots of artists ended up having their original masters changed. So if you’re looking for an “authentic experience” there are many instances where the only way to do that is with the original release. Also records seem to outlive cd’s for some reason. I don’t see any of these formats as superior to one another though, so long as you are getting whatever it is you are looking for from the art your consuming.

You're wrong about cds my friend

DVD is like a cleaner version of vhs. I prefer vhs then dvds. Blu-rays doesn't give you that old school charm in the older movies

It’s hard to find horror tapes

The format of a movie is part of the experience. For me watching a movie in VHS is like listening to music on Vinyl. Is CD better than vinyl ? No , its just different. Vinyl is a unique listening experience. Same way VHS is unique. And so is DVD. All formats are unique viewing. Thats why i own a few favorite movies on VHS , DVD and BR. Just because BR or 4K is razor sharp doesnt mean its better.

I'm the same however I won't buy run of the mill cassettes ,I only like rare uncertified videos..and I take any...beta.vhs.philips...in fact I prefer beta cassettes as the moniker beta looks so much better along the artwork than the common vhs..and video2000 etc wow...

I'm 46 yrs old and have collected video cassettes since I was at school and before the video recording act in UK..I did a talk in English class on certification of horror videos the same year it came into effect and had my vhs confiscated by headmaster who threatened calling police until he was convinced by me that it wasn't illegal to own uncertified video only renting them.after a call to local police he returned them to me..I got a good grade for the English talk..my preview screening didn't go so well tho as horrified looks of the normal classmates who were not used to hardcore horror..lol..the English teacher. *mr.rummary* loved them tho..many teachers were over interested in the cassettes as it was all over the tabloids at the time and many had never seen a *video nasty* my goodness imagine if they had seen standard genre fare from nowadays..they would maybe have fainted..hahah. strange times indeed.

@solcutta-zt9uw

5 жыл бұрын

I took three specimen vhs to school that day..anyone guess what they would be?? As prime examples of video nasties??

i love movies

VHS LIVES MATTER!!!

I agree with you on films because dvd/blu was a huge step up from VHS but you're totally off with records and music. A lot of CDs are not true to the original releases especially for older music. They're often remixed and altered. There's also many CDs (late 90s-to present) that suffer from the "loudness war" style of remastering as well which eliminates dynamic range. Also CDs are limited to 44.1 khz and there's definitely an analog warmth and clarity to old music with no digital sourcing. As far as the pops, crackles and distortion use a real setup with clean records, high quality stylus and this is really minimized. A lot of people into vinyl now have no idea how to properly setup a turntable as far as tracking force, proper anti-skating etc. I wouldn't compare this to VHS tapes and digital formats at all.

quinton tarantino mostly watches movies on vhs tape

@OriasX

3 жыл бұрын

Really? Where did he say that? If you remember

@Espo2250

3 жыл бұрын

@@OriasX here's the video...kzread.info/dash/bejne/rGt6s658o7e6odY.html

Found some VHS tapes of old UFC fights from the 90's my dad recorded. Been binging them for days now. Memories...

I agree with you re: VHS, but your comparison to vinyl is not accurate at all. Until the CD era, recordings were produced with vinyl in mind. Albums were mixed specifically for that format. And the pops, clicks, and scratches are generally not present when an LP is brand new. That happens more when people don’t take care of their records and don’t clean them. A clean vinyl record that is well produced can sound just as good as a CD. It’s really a matter of preference. Unlike VHS which was always a shitty format and the only appeal is nostalgic.

Hell no? How about HELL YES If there were good new VHS movies i would watch them TODAY I still have my VHS tapes and VCR :)

Hello my VHS friend!!! Have you see my debut masterpiece REEL yet? Very rare VHS just release of it my friend.

I just revive my vcr my goodness watching a vhs on a flat screen hurts my eyes lol 😂😏

@OriasX

3 жыл бұрын

Buy a good crt tv,it’s worth it ;)

UHD?

So... I'm gonna just throw this out there since you don't take the time to answer my other comments anyways... if you want a movie for its "historical value" why wouldn't someone want it sealed?... now why wouldn't you want to put that sealed movie into a Slab/grade it?... I really think your emotions are getting the best of you with vhsdna... part of sealed grading is seal grading why would you open it inspect it if the only reason is rare is because of the seal?..... there's plenty of open copies for you to watch go to a yard sale... not trolling brother love your Channel and I still want you to reach out to me

@vhscollector

2 жыл бұрын

In this video, I'm referring to rare videos, not common Hollywood films that were printed in the millions. An item unsealed has more historical value, at least from my perspective, because it can be studied inside and out. With a sealed tape, there's no guarantee that the film is even still on the cassette. There's so much uncertainty. A sealed video may be an interesting conversation piece, but there's still so many unknowns.

I wonder, do you have Satanic Attraction, or Rockula on VHS? I do, they are supposed to be rare!

@vhscollector

4 жыл бұрын

I've already reviewed Satanic Attraction on this channel. Check it out!

@SnowWolvesStorm

4 жыл бұрын

@@vhscollector I will thanks!

Like I drink your blood in the UK beta ..same cover art.but that betamax sticker along the title edge looks super sexy..a vhs *beater* (pun intended)

I think this is the first time I've ever been offended on the internet ......trickster false fake

The original evil dead is the only movie I’d watch on the old vhs format over any updated one... lights off, cold beer cracked open, curtains closed... the movies so much better on vhs how it was intended. Grainy something magical about it.

Yeah, I don't get it. Folks my age who had to schlep piles of heavy records and portable record players around just to hear a few songs found CDs and never looked back. And now with my iPod I can plug into a friend's system and have every album I ever bought and more at my fingertips. I still have all of my albums but I think they are now petrified.

1:55 that was me exactly. I had the book called "creature features" by John Stanley. Thought about so many obscure horror titles to hunt down, especially before I had the internet.

@vhscollector

6 жыл бұрын

I also had that one! Isn't that the one with the mysterious Cheerleader Camp 2 review? The book I used most often was the 2001 Golden Movie Retriever book - a goldmine at the time for wacky hard to find titles.

@85wastedyears

6 жыл бұрын

lol, yeah that Cheerleader Camp 2 review is puzzling.

who is this hipster?

They’re not hipsters bro. 🙄

Another, " i collect VHS because its cool" kid who at VHS days wasnt even born...whatever...

@fuckenps3

6 жыл бұрын

He's not that young?

@fuckenps3

6 жыл бұрын

Also, who the fuck cares? To each their own.

😕my comment below has the most likes but I fail to get a reply??

Calls site VHS collector.com but Calls himself not a VHS collector

@vhscollector

6 жыл бұрын

Haha The site itself began as a database of VHS releases, so it is literally a VHS collector. The name of the site does not refer to myself. In a literal sense, I guess I am a VHS collector, but I don't collect them because they are VHS, but rather because of their historic/intrinsic value or print status.

@SneakyNinjaToad

6 жыл бұрын

The Analog Archivist I was just fucking around but it was cool to get a response, thanks boss

The part about the vinyl is actually not true. Vinyl sounds better than digital music, and many artists who think that their music should be heard on vinyl

@fuckenps3

6 жыл бұрын

"Vinyl sounds better than digital music" is not a factual statement, it is a subjective valuation.

@johnwilliams9175

5 жыл бұрын

it depends on a case by case basis but overall it's definitely true.

@ryankirwin8621

5 жыл бұрын

@@fuckenps3 depending on the mix but vinyl actually will sound better than digital cd etc due to lack of compression. So its not so much an opinion as it is objective

@fuckenps3

5 жыл бұрын

That is only true occasionally. They could put the same mix on the CD/online if they wanted.

@ryankirwin8621

5 жыл бұрын

@@fuckenps3 those formats compress the sound too much. And if its the cd mix on the wax the consumers getting ripped off