bravo brilliance and perserverance

Good job. ❤

Is there a live numbers visual? That'd be awesome

@miketexas4549

Ай бұрын

Then we can all countdown to our extinction.

@h73mwtc

Ай бұрын

ONLY 27000 years to be carbon neutral Machine you can wait😂

I recall hearing that these machines were pointless due to such small numbers of carbon actually being removed. It was something like 0.2%

@user-mm6zh9pe3m

Ай бұрын

I would like to believe that this is true. Removing carbon from the atmosphere is stupid.

@lordbob-up9wd

6 күн бұрын

This one removes the amount of carbon released into the atmosphere in 4 seconds per years. We’d need like 8 million of these to counter climate change. They’re only usable against the small rest of emissions once we cut them as much as possible

@reason3581

Күн бұрын

It will be significant when they scale it up. But noone has claimed that it is instead of emission mitigations. Obviously we need both.

@user-mm6zh9pe3m

22 сағат бұрын

@@reason3581 What's wrong with global warming? For example, I live in an area with a very cold climate. If there is warming, the climate will become more comfortable. You propose to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, but how are you suggesting that I heat my home? If it gets warmer, there will be fewer victims of frostbite. Do you want people to still get frostbite?

Hope you are not using Elon Musk math.

@waterlife.1905

Ай бұрын

NASA math only works when you have unlimited time and money for a project like the SLS. Yet it is a decade behind schedule and 4 decades behind space x technology wise. And not reusable. Elon Musk is one of our great minds, and will be the equivalent of Einstein or Nicholas Tesla. The guy is brilliant and has vision that is met with success time after time. I understand the jealousy and spite he gets doing so at a fraction of the price of our own space program with NASA. It reminds us that we are being forced to fund wasteful projects that do not have our planet in mind when it comes to reusability, aka smaller carbon footprint.

@Wheatty

Ай бұрын

@@waterlife.1905very well spoken👏🏼

@waterlife.1905

Ай бұрын

@@Wheatty Thank you.

So out of curiosity..... You made CO2 during the mining of the raw material. More CO2 to ship it to get processed. More CO2 to have that shipped to be fabricated. CO2 from the fabrication itself. More CO2 to have the fabricated pieces to where they're going. More CO2 to prepare the land. I mean, if you're pumping captured CO2 underground, how much did you release just from digging the hole? More CO2 to construct the building itself..... And add up the amount of CO2 of each person that woke up and drove to work to go through all of that. Don't get me wrong. I think this is great, but realistically, how long until you're at net zero just from the amount of CO2 used to make it? Plus: 0:42 You're having people drive their cars to what looks like the middle of nowhere. Longer drives=more CO2. It almost feels like you're just pouring water on a drowning person because you want to make sure they don't get thirsty.

@reason3581

Ай бұрын

Google "LCA Climeworks"

@h73mwtc

Ай бұрын

If you cout 1.5kg co2 per dollar Is need to run 27000years to be carbon neutral😂

@davidv1219

Күн бұрын

Nice metaphor with the drowning person and thirst!

You know there is a much much much cheaper options and it's free to use and mother nature takes care of it all it this wonder thing called trees plant some.

@colin1235421

Ай бұрын

No, trees do not do enough at all... And our C02 levels are still increasing by the way.

@MrWolfen

Ай бұрын

@@colin1235421 So what human and animals can live still quite happy at 400 or even 600 ppm. It's a balance. More co2 more green planet less co2 less green less food production and less people. Your choice but I love CO2. I love carbon.

@user-mm6zh9pe3m

Ай бұрын

@@colin1235421 If there is no carbon, then what will all living things be made of?

@Ramzblood

28 күн бұрын

​@@colin1235421 you lie!! Of course trees and forest do enough. That's why there all cut down. Because they were doing enough. Electric grid terra forming and mass extinction is all this CO2 biz is about.

@lordbob-up9wd

6 күн бұрын

@@colin1235421so instead we’re gonna build 8 million of these things

That's a lot of carbon credits... 🎉🎉🎉 great job

So.... When is this thing gonna start up? Also, will you guys make a monthly report about a month after it first turns on? Also, are other companies around the world hard at work on working on their own versions of Mammoth? If so, how soon can they start up?

@colin1235421

Ай бұрын

It already started according to the video.

@adamcaillouette7375

Ай бұрын

@@colin1235421 I swear, if places like the States and Canada really want to cut emissions by 50% before 2030, one of the first things to do is the emergency production and distribution of electrofuels globally, and at reasonable prices, as soon as possible! So many others sound like they rather embrace their doom than try to save the planet.

Congrats Climeworks

I also want to get free-money via carbon credits.. Turning some fans and claiming I am saving the planet, sounds like the green-washing my business needs! While overlooking real pollution and blaming everything on the same gas plants need to grow.. Just to keep on consuming as never before.. Here we have convinced the kids already (big thanks to UNESCO). So we are expecting a high-return ratio by the end of the decade.. Can you tell me where I can get the 2030 pin, so to unlock Tecnocratic-bank (BIS) funds on my next business trip to Switzerland? haha

@reason3581

Күн бұрын

The IPCC clearly states we need both emission mitigation and carbon removal. So explain to me again why this is greenwashing.

What happens when the place they store the carbon somehow releases all the carbon they have ever captured at once?

@BikeAmsterdam

Ай бұрын

It reacts with minerals in the rock that form stable compounds immobilizing the gas.

@AnotherCarChanel

Ай бұрын

@BikeAmsterdam that's great! I know it's only the second one made, and unfortunately we have created tons of carbon monoxide in the time I've been typing this(I text slow) doesn't this equate to trying to save a sinking ship with a bucket? We have raped this planet and now it seems like they're are just trying to put her underwear back on and trying to pretend it wasn't us. Whatever Mother Earth decides to do us, we as a parasitic species, deserve what she throws at us. With that being said I am not looking forward to it.

@reason3581

Күн бұрын

@@AnotherCarChanel1) they plan to scale it up to megaton and gigaton capacity 2) DAC is only one of several carbon removal methods. 3) When we reach net zero these technologies will help us get to negative emissions and repair some of the damage we have done.

Congratulations

Woohoo, I like how they're talking in gigatons!

@miketexas4549

Ай бұрын

Only if you want people do be extinct

Yay!

Why do we need this ?

@colin1235421

Ай бұрын

Cause C02 levels keep increasing, and we are heading to a run away situation where things keep getting worse - and growing food is going to become vastly more difficult and expensive, many species of life will die and diseases will thrive....

@mikei8957

Ай бұрын

You mean when they fly planes all day spraying the sky’s to control the weather thru geoengineering? That pollution?

@lordbob-up9wd

6 күн бұрын

To reduce CO2 levels just like the comment above said. But it would be way better to just reduce the amount of CO2 released into the atmosphere

I'm going to use you as an example. Congratulations!. Thank you for contributing in my purpose. I will observe that you will reply and we can adjust to logic of conversation. Or or I will observe that I will not be replied to and I will use you as an example of? Who am I.

You know, instead of tearing down the trees, you could have left them where they're at. They do a better job of capturing CO2 and turning it into oxygen. But I digress.

@ScribblesOfOwls

Ай бұрын

It was built in a treeless field in Iceland. Iceland does not have many trees as it is, due to geological shifts in the past, and volcanic activity.

@user-jf7hy7dv4m

Ай бұрын

Always 1% of people on this planet work so the rest of 99% to live happily in their own ignorance

@colin1235421

Ай бұрын

Trees are not enough... we need efficient systems like this.

@yancgc5098

22 күн бұрын

Trees also release CO2 during nighttime, they’re not very good at lowering atmospheric CO2 levels

@lordbob-up9wd

6 күн бұрын

There weren’t any trees there

How much you createt by buylding it and how much co2 must be created to pay for thys ? And how many years it take to zero them ? I found somwhere Is 1.5kg CO2 per dollar bud im not sure. 650milx1.5is 975mil tuns co2 just for money to thys So they can remove 36000 per year So 27083years to be carbon neutral 😂😂😂🎉🎉🎉 sry for my english

@reason3581

Күн бұрын

They have links to life cycle analysis on their site.

I feel like this is a bad idea. Like back in medieval times drilling holes into peoples heads to relieve headaches where in the future we learn that's now how you do it most of the time.

So they are selling us air now?!?!

@miketexas4549

Ай бұрын

Spaceballs

More Co2 the planet becomes more green the tree breathes in Co2 oxygen comes out

@colin1235421

Ай бұрын

Plants will start dying when C02 levels are too high - and good luck buying affordable food because crops wont grow in the increased heat.

@lordbob-up9wd

6 күн бұрын

But A) we don’t let more trees grow and B) that only works until you have a certain amount of CO2 emissions.

Co2 is GOOD. Why the hell are they trying to remove it? It's pure madness.

@armynyus9123

Ай бұрын

I can picture Archeologists, diging this out in 1000 years or so, then trying to reconstruct its purpose.. They will have to come up with theories about a crazy religion or so. And in fact, that would not be that far off from the truth. Utter insanity.

@colin1235421

Ай бұрын

Cause its increasing far beyond normal levels.

@miketexas4549

Ай бұрын

@@colin1235421 No that's a lie. The vostok ice core samples proved that co2 levels were THIRTY TIMES what they are today, before humans ever industrialized. They also proved that increased CO2 comes AS A RESULT OF rising temperatures, not the other way around. You've been lied to.

@miketexas4549

Ай бұрын

@@colin1235421 No it isn't. That's propaganda.

@ommanipadmehung3014

21 күн бұрын

Are you sure the oil and gas companies are not lying? Follow the money - which rich elite group have the most to lose from a transition to clean energy ?

What is all this for? By removing carbon from the atmosphere, you will end up with no carbon remaining in the biosphere! All living things are made of carbon.

@lordbob-up9wd

6 күн бұрын

What? The carbon doesn’t disappear. And by letting it stay in the atmosphere the temperature on earth will rise, destroying life as we know it

@user-mm6zh9pe3m

5 күн бұрын

But with warming, life in the cold parts of the Earth becomes much more comfortable. Far fewer people die from frostbite. By opposing warming, you are advocating for people to continue to die from the cold.

@lordbob-up9wd

5 күн бұрын

@@user-mm6zh9pe3m but more people will die from heatstroke, the habitable regions will move north meaning a lot of people will also move north -> mass migration, there will be more natural disasters (hurricanes…), when the see rises even more habitable land will be lost

@user-mm6zh9pe3m

5 күн бұрын

@@lordbob-up9wd Frost is much more dangerous than heat. And if efforts to globally cool the planet are crowned with success, then where should people living in the north go?

@lordbob-up9wd

4 күн бұрын

@@user-mm6zh9pe3m the efforts to cool the planet just want to bring it back to pre industrial levels. So for the people living in the north it will be pretty much like it was for the last few thousand years

Or just could've planted trees

@reason3581

Күн бұрын

Trees are fantastic. We need to do both. It’s not either or.

Give me a break. Spinning false hope for profit? You people have no soul.

@colin1235421

Ай бұрын

Thats like saying no one should have started modern medicine... it takes time and investment to get somewhere.

People are so gullible and dumb.

think this is a stupid idea and a waste of money! but thats just me

@reason3581

Күн бұрын

Yes it’s just you. The IPCC clearly states we need both emission reduction and carbon dioxide removal.

@cnhiggy

Күн бұрын

@@reason3581 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@cnhiggy

Күн бұрын

You're on drugs

This is the dumbest project possible…..

@colin1235421

Ай бұрын

Why? Please also indicate what your scientific background is...

@user-mm6zh9pe3m

Ай бұрын

@@colin1235421 Because sometimes you have to use your head. All carbon is removed from the atmosphere by this machine forever!

@yancgc5098

22 күн бұрын

@@user-mm6zh9pe3m The goal is to reduce CO2 from 427 ppm to 280 ppm, y’know, the level we had in preindustrial times

@user-mm6zh9pe3m

21 күн бұрын

@@yancgc5098 But the more carbon in the atmosphere, the more opportunities for plant growth. Why is a small increase in the share of carbon dioxide so bad?

@yancgc5098

21 күн бұрын

@@user-mm6zh9pe3m Because we never needed this extra CO2 in the atmosphere changing our global climate and destabilizing our society in order to feed the billions of people on Earth, we were doing just fine with 280 ppm of CO2