I’m gunna be honest, as a kid I never even noticed that I was too focused on the fact there were cool slightly murderous mermaids on screen to notice

@emmanone621

Жыл бұрын

As a kid I noticed but my mom said she knew I was lesbian when I was 7 so maybe that was just me

@cfri9332

Жыл бұрын

@@emmanone621 Damn, got outted by Peter Pan? I feel that

@whitedragoness23

Жыл бұрын

I just thought “magical mermaid were so cool” they were covered up so in my child’s brain it might as well have been bras.

@JohnSmith-wx9wj

Жыл бұрын

I always thought of them as mean bitches.

@InternetMameluq

Жыл бұрын

@@emmanone621 Yeah my mom said she knew I was a breast man when I was still a toddler. XD

I think just having the hair cover them or a necklace makes them look even more magical

@gayjayy

Жыл бұрын

And more accurate. How many mermaids would actually wear living animals on their breasts?

@mahilagoncam8381

Жыл бұрын

@@gayjayy Exactly 😂😅

@leasagna2202

Жыл бұрын

True. Its kids more natural

@queenr.s656

Жыл бұрын

@@gayjayy true

@ccscheller8193

Жыл бұрын

​@@gayjayydid you know a seastar's mouth is at the center of its body?

What young child would be thinking "Mermaid obscenity! Throw it out mother!" A child wouldn't even notice 😂

@leemeep7078

Жыл бұрын

To be honest I didn’t notice either I watch that movie all the time and I’m 13!

@Romcomm_

Жыл бұрын

I noticed but didn't see anything wrong with it

@ankeokennedy4380

Жыл бұрын

I didn't notice it untill it was pointed out

@MadameSomnambule

Жыл бұрын

@@Anon12077 It's like in classical paintings and statues. Fairies and mermaids afaik were always depicted being naked and nobody gave a shit until movies became a thing.

@MIS315

Жыл бұрын

A feminist

angry moms :"this generation is so sensitive" also moms:

@dandycrow2821

Жыл бұрын

There has never been criticism about this of the mermaids or about the mermaid in general, there's nothing about it on movie trivias, not on IMDb, nor on Wikipedia, not on Disney Wiki! He made it up! Neo-puritan Disney under Micheal Eisner and Bob Iger simply created a problem and then "fixed" it! I also remind you that the age target audience of the older Disney animated movies was more mature than the one more recent from Micheal Eisner to Bob Iger eras, and I also remind you that (non-canon and unsuccesful) Peter Pan 2: Return To Neverland was made by the more kid-friendly and defunct DisneyToon Studios!

@pileofsaltOG

Жыл бұрын

@@dandycrow2821 even still. parents are so suprised that their kids are entitled and sensitive when their the ones who made them that way by coddling their children and thinking no one can hurt them

@dandycrow2821

Жыл бұрын

@@pileofsaltOG Those angry moms, unironically, were and are usually feminist and liberal neo-puritan Karens. In fact, Walt Disney was conservative, and Japanese artists and developers are conservatives. Coincidence?

@frogking6416

Жыл бұрын

People have been sensitive for decades they just get on different things to be offended over, and thanks to the internet everyone and their mom can share their opinions on any given topic

@pileofsaltOG

Жыл бұрын

@@frogking6416 no but fr. people who call others snowflakes are also as well technically snowflakes. everyone gets offended by something but for some reason older generations act like it's just gen z

I feel like the old movie covered more than the new one

@dandycrow2821

Жыл бұрын

There has never been criticism about this of the mermaids or about the mermaid in general, there's nothing about it on movie trivias, not on IMDb, nor on Wikipedia, not on Disney Wiki! He made it up! Neo-puritan Disney under Micheal Eisner and Bob Iger simply created a problem and then "fixed" it! I also remind you that the age target audience of the older Disney animated movies was more mature than the one more recent from Micheal Eisner to Bob Iger eras, and I also remind you that (non-canon and unsuccesful) Peter Pan 2: Return To Neverland was made by the more kid-friendly and defunct DisneyToon Studios!

@ngrjordi2352

Жыл бұрын

@@dandycrow2821 cringe

@dandycrow2821

Жыл бұрын

@@ngrjordi2352 Me? Why, scuse me?

@rawdasalmataman7908

Жыл бұрын

Not really

@hoshicloverfield

3 ай бұрын

Yes from the movies I've seen.​@@rawdasalmataman7908

That's not even the worst bit ....THEY CHANGED THERE TAIL COLOURS!! the original ones had SKY BLUE but now they have a SEAFOAM GREEN similar to Ariel

@angelacooper8973

Жыл бұрын

Aren’t they related to Ariel?

@michaelburns2003

Жыл бұрын

@@angelacooper8973 not officially, they could be cousin's of Ariel, but not directly. people theorize that queen Athena( Ariel's mum, from "Ariel's beginning") was a Neverland mermaid but I don't think that's the case. Theyer....a different breed to Ariel is, as if you look at there tails, the Neverland mermaids don't have the fins Ariel does, even the mermaid with the ponytail ( who's speculated to be Athena) doesn't. When they re designed the mermaids in PP2:RN , they could have added the fins onto there desighn but they didn't

@spino-ace

Жыл бұрын

Their*

@Spacebugg

Жыл бұрын

....why?

@michaelburns2003

Жыл бұрын

@@Spacebugg inconsistency💀

"upper private parts" at this point call them lumps of flesh I'm editing this comment because I have literally gotten 4 notifications every day that someone has commented on here to say this.

@abnormalcaffeineintake2532

Жыл бұрын

Chesticals

@Yeno__

Жыл бұрын

@@abnormalcaffeineintake2532 ha

@abnormalcaffeineintake2532

Жыл бұрын

@@Yeno__ 😃

@FuzaketeSatsugai

Жыл бұрын

@@abnormalcaffeineintake2532 NAHHH IM CALLING MY TITS THIS NOW

@abnormalcaffeineintake2532

Жыл бұрын

@@FuzaketeSatsugai That's what I call mine😂

The young audience was literally at most 7 years off of using those “upper private parts” as a source of warmth, food, and connection to their maternal figures

@velvety2006

Жыл бұрын

'mermaids try to pull wendy in the water to possibly drown her and peter is laughing at it' mom 'they are wearing no bras, how indecent! grab the pitchforks!

@InternetMameluq

Жыл бұрын

This is the formula generation, actually. So have pity on them.

@InternetMameluq

Жыл бұрын

@@velvety2006 I'm okay with topless women drowning me. That's a cool way to die. Especially if they're monsters. That's like one tier down from being fucked to death by hot minotaur babes.

@twist_ending7545

Жыл бұрын

​@@InternetMameluq Do you have a problem with formula or something?

@InternetMameluq

Жыл бұрын

@@twist_ending7545 What do you mean, formula? You mean the invention? No. You mean Nestle? Yes.

“We were only trying to drown her” That line stuck out to me more than anything…

Dude if mermaids existed I am pretty sure they wouldn't even be wearing bras. Even if they did, they wouldn't be mutilating clams over it lmfao

@calypsokiosko9067

Жыл бұрын

Boobs hurt when they bounce even in water.

@Dan_-

Жыл бұрын

I'm not sure they'd have breasts in the first place, since I doubt they'd feed their young that way.

@fourke

Жыл бұрын

@@Dan_- omg you're right

@UsagiMay

Жыл бұрын

​@@Dan_- i don't know in my mind there might just be two or more types of mermaids if they did exist mammals and more fish like so they could breastfeed their young

@MadameSomnambule

Жыл бұрын

@@Dan_- If they do, chances are, mermaid breasts would probably be there purely to protect vital organs or for some other purpose. Some people have similar speculations on the inklings' and octolings' breasts in Splatoon for similar reasons.

As a child who LOVED Peter Pan; I can say that I literally NEVER noticed and I watched it daily. People complain about these things but kids literally don't notice.

@monsterhanna6691

Жыл бұрын

It's like dress codes at school where only the teachers and staff notice how "inappropriate" the students are.

@weebedout1311

Жыл бұрын

@@monsterhanna6691 EXACTLY!

@emmajohnson7216

Жыл бұрын

Same this was my favorite movie as a kid but I never noticed

@lagopusvulpuz1571

Жыл бұрын

​@@monsterhanna6691 "those distractive shoulders".

@sadespain01

Жыл бұрын

A lot of people also don't realize how racist Peter Pan is, but that doesn't make it okay.

Old fairytale Illustrations would usually have mermaids covered up like that or even have their chests out. It wasn't perverted it was whimsical, like of course they don't have clothes in the sea, they're basically fish!

@renomiz2373

Жыл бұрын

I miss old fairy tales. I think the whole "protecting the youth" changes kinda ruined the point of a lot of them and removed the magic of what made them special.

@troywright359

Жыл бұрын

​@@renomiz2373 i dunno. Making the little mermaid walk on knives, or have pinocchio literally be a murderer might not have been the best even back then

@renomiz2373

Жыл бұрын

@@troywright359 That's the thing, Pinocchio and The little mermaid aren't exactly fairy tales. They are more like Alice in wonderland or the Land of OZ than stories from folklore. Tbf pinnochio actually lived in the book and didn't really die and the knives were a metaphor for the pain. Fairy tales like by the Grimms actually weren't as dark as people seem to think they are.

@lulolie

Жыл бұрын

​@@renomiz2373I have the grimms fairytales and they're a lot darker than most people realize.

People freak out way too much over women’s chest

@goldenmolelover

Жыл бұрын

ong, and its not like they were bare chested and flashing the camera 😭 they were legit just existing onscreen

@queenr.s656

Жыл бұрын

Yeah and they don't freak out over a man not wearing a shirt

@trevorthesorcerer

Жыл бұрын

“FBI Open up”

@revanius2213

Жыл бұрын

True, it's something I never really got, there is pretty much no problem with seeing a man without his shirt, including overweight men, while it's considered scandalous for a woman to not wear a shirt because a part of their body sticks out a bit and can bounce, and yet it's not scandalous when a 300 pound man is on the beach with his shirt off and there is plenty of flesh sticking out and bouncing.

@zach11241

Жыл бұрын

What I love is when a man gets a sex change on TV, and before the surgery they show his chest and after they blur it out. We’re a nation of prudes! 😂

The old movie was more modest cause they added less shape to the chest

@dandycrow2821

Жыл бұрын

There has never been criticism about this of the mermaids or about the mermaid in general, there's nothing about it on movie trivias, not on IMDb, nor on Wikipedia, not on Disney Wiki! He made it up! Neo-puritan Disney under Micheal Eisner and Bob Iger simply created a problem and then "fixed" it! I also remind you that the age target audience of the older Disney animated movies was more mature than the one more recent from Micheal Eisner to Bob Iger eras, and I also remind you that (non-canon and unsuccesful) Peter Pan 2: Return To Neverland was made by the more kid-friendly and defunct DisneyToon Studios!

@serasv1249

Жыл бұрын

​@@pillowdragon5576 And A cups don't exist either...

@pillowdragon5576

Жыл бұрын

@@serasv1249 not everyone is gonna be flat

@earthing3696

Жыл бұрын

​@@serasv1249 most people are not flat

@lucidfangirl1030

Жыл бұрын

What r yall arguing about? Op just saying they had smaller breasts, thats all.

I actually like the original mermaids in the original Peter Pan, it seems more realistic and feels how mermaids would actually be

It never bothered me when I was a kid watching the mermaids in the 1st Peter Pan. Because their mermaids and it made sense to me as a young child Why mermaids didn't wear clothes. There was nothing wrong with the design they were quite decent. It's not like they showed Peter Pan playing with their Boobs.

@a.g.demada5263

Жыл бұрын

Same, I never paid attention to that

@zach11241

Жыл бұрын

They went from the Lost Boys to the Hardy Boys!

@12Tecpatl

Жыл бұрын

Im pretty sure all kids are aware their moms and other women in their lives have breasts, they're a normal part of human bodies. Covering up or deleting them in movies to avoid letting kids notice them literally makes no sense

@a.g.demada5263

Жыл бұрын

@@12Tecpatl of course

@troywright359

Жыл бұрын

But even if Peter pan did play with them, why would that have bothered anyone?

when I was a child I never thought of the mermaids in such way, children are not the dirty minded ones, the adults are!! if you believe something to be inappropriate that is YOU, the child won't see what you see.

Bro, they're the ones making it Inappropriate. 💀

@velvety2006

Жыл бұрын

'mermaids try to pull wendy to possibly drown her and peter laughs at it' moms seeing the movies: gasp the mermaids wear no bras! how indecent, grab the pitchforks!

@justanothermortal1373

6 ай бұрын

Exactly they're the ones who see breasts as sexual things 🙄. They're the ones saying that.

@Cixzag

2 ай бұрын

​@@justanothermortal1373 well, the naked human body is really sexualized (even tho at the start clothes didn't exist and humans were naked bc, well... it's our body, but humans created clothes and decided it's sexual not to wear them), mostly boobs, and that will probably always be like that :/

@lightborn9071

Ай бұрын

@@Cixzag It is evolutionary intented.

“They're called boobs, Ed” - E.Brockovich

"Upper private parts"🤣🤣I'm dying

I've literally never heard anyone call breasts "upper private parts".

@InternetMameluq

Жыл бұрын

I haven't heard in this decade. But it's a thing, I assue you. Especially in 1000 AD.

@Pharaoh_Tutankhamen

8 ай бұрын

@@InternetMameluq I'm more of a 1000 BC kind of dude

@InternetMameluq

8 ай бұрын

@@Pharaoh_TutankhamenLet's disco dance, Hammurabi.

@InternetMameluq

8 ай бұрын

@@Pharaoh_TutankhamenIronically the Mameluq Sultanate was almost exactly 1300 AD, compared to Tutankhamun's 1300 BC.

Having their hair or necklaces cover them is more realistic. What kind of mermaid just slaps on a starfish and thinks “hm, yes… this is comfortable”💀

@turkoositerapsidi

Жыл бұрын

And how would they get sea star to stay there unmoving if it is still alive. They are carnivorous animals.

@panda_cute8856

Жыл бұрын

@@turkoositerapsidi Still very unrealistic.

@turkoositerapsidi

Жыл бұрын

@@panda_cute8856 Yes, but I did made one month stake, not all sea stars are carnivorous, but some are. You could and would not keep them like that. Clam shells would actually make sense because mermaids would likely eat clams anyway.

@davidwesley2525

6 ай бұрын

@panda_cute8856 Bras were Not available to Mermaids Back Then , They Had to Use Seashells & Seastars to Cover Their BOOBS. 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅

@panda_cute8856

6 ай бұрын

@@davidwesley2525 Obviously but more realistically they would’ve just used their hair or necklaces OR just didn’t care and let them hang out.

Their hair and necklaces actually cover like 30% more than the shells

I always thought it was to give them a look more like Ariel in Peter Pan 2. So that you know the Disneyverse is connected.

Too sexualised for kids? I can honestly say I never, ever thought of them in that way and never have 🤣 they were just pretty mermaids and that was it.

I don't remember hearing anyone criticizing the mermaids . Must have been some rich fussy people who paid $ to have their Criticism heard.

@z_.5557

Жыл бұрын

Conservatives. Plain and simple.

@lilenwasnothere6867

Жыл бұрын

well, that was 70 years ago

Just call them breasts. Half the population has them

@creepy-kitty

Жыл бұрын

Exactly it sounds like they're just dirty calling them upper privates which they freaking aren't!🤦🏻‍♀️

@Creepystalker102

Жыл бұрын

Actually 100% of the population has breasts. We just colloquially only refer to women this way. That’s why males have nipples and can get breast cancer

@InternetMameluq

Жыл бұрын

All of the population has them. We don't censor organs based on size, that's stupid. What size do your fingers need to be before they're 'indecent'?

@InternetMameluq

Жыл бұрын

@@Creepystalker102 Yeah, did you know that men's breasts used to be considered just as sexual as women's breasts? That's why you can see all those old timey protestant men wearing full body swimsuits around 1900 AD. They passed laws to make men's chests acceptable bare, but not womens... Well, for most places in Anglo america. There's a patchwork of 'right to bare breast' locales, like my own British Columbia.

@lagopusvulpuz1571

Жыл бұрын

​​@@InternetMameluq male chest was never seen as sexual at all. Only their muscle is often contemplated. The difference is that in old times being exposed in any way in public was considered inappropriate. Men & Women used complete clothes, including swimsuits & pajamas. It isn't like men grow breast tissue during puberty.

Kids literally don't sexualize the human body until way later in life. This was unnecessary

@user-jm6cl6fj1l

Жыл бұрын

And the mermaids themselves weren’t even sexualized either, they’re just existing

@sadespain01

Жыл бұрын

They do if they've been sexually assaulted.

@BPJD2004

Ай бұрын

@@sadespain01even then, they don’t understand being sexualized like the mermaids were.

Back in another time, this was a staple of purity, a mind of innocence and freedom.

@zerotodona1495

Жыл бұрын

It’s possible to though, the mermaids are underage so they have to be more careful compare to the old days where a myth was myth.

Personally I liked them just having the necklace or hair covering their chest because it seemed more realistic and made them more mythical to me because I never thought that mermaids would actually wear shells and starfish to cover themselves. Basically they wouldn't be embarrassed about showing skin is how I always thought of it

so if breasts (mammary glands) are reproductive organs, and mermaids cant exactly give birth, why would they need them/need to cover them??- Besides the necklaces and hair worked fine

Ok but- Mermaids don’t wear anything in the “lumps of flesh” (lol someone said that) So they where making it accurate👁_👁

@a.g.demada5263

Жыл бұрын

Honestly, I never paid attention to that as a little girl and even now as an adult woman

@MadameSomnambule

Жыл бұрын

Hell, a couple of the mermaids probably went to sleep while eating and ended up with starfish covering their tatas and just never bothered to remove them lol

@No0neKn0ws

Жыл бұрын

@@MadameSomnambule maybe that’s what happened lol

@No0neKn0ws

Жыл бұрын

@@MadameSomnambule wait- don’t starfish have mouths?-

@turkoositerapsidi

Жыл бұрын

​@@No0neKn0ws Yes. They also have tube feet at underside of their arms that they use in feeding and movement for example.

I didn’t even notice the mermaids weren’t fully covered until this video. 👁👄👁

To those people: I have never noticed this, and Peter Pan was the movie I watched all the time as a kid.

I actually like the way the hair or the necklaces cover their chest, it feels more real and its closer to legends of sirens

@TheGlitchingFox

Жыл бұрын

Same. I love mythology and it kind of bugs me when they modify how the real creatures look. Unless it’s something that really shouldn’t be shown in a kids movie, I see no problem with having mythological creatures look like how they really would.

@turkoositerapsidi

Жыл бұрын

But aren't sirens sea bird people?

@BPJD2004

Ай бұрын

@@turkoositerapsidiit depends on which sirens you’re looking at. Greek sirens, yes, those were the bird women who couldn’t leave their island. Other stories of sirens were actually half fish women, some were mermaids who went mad or were the spirits of vengeful women who were drowned.

@turkoositerapsidi

Ай бұрын

@@BPJD2004 Yeah I remember that some time the description of sirens did change in some areas to became half fish women, and that word is used for mermaid in some languages today. Was it many or few Latin languages like Italian or Spanish? I think I should see from online dictionary.

They complained about that, but didnt complain that the mermaids actively tried to drown wendy?

@velvety2006

Жыл бұрын

and peter laughing while they were trying

@RaphBlade7

Жыл бұрын

Well, it's like that one South Park episode, where they say parents won't care if something is violent as long as it has sexual stuff in it! Just look at GTA's HOT COFFEE MOD controversy (there was a GTA game that had a scrapped SEX mini game which could be enabled with mods & parents got miffed, despite the game being Rated M for Mature 17+ known for its violent content)! Its just sad, how people fail to realize they aren't wearing bras cause they are magical creatures who lack any shame regarding their bodies (its like those tribes where the women walk around topless cause its considered completely normal in their culture & may be even practical as they may live in a hot climate, or they simply never developed clothing to cover a woman's breasts) & don't wear bras simply cause they are effectively fully nude as their mermaid tails are meant to be part of their bodies even if you can't see any visible genitalia (as it may be internal or eggs are fertilized outside of the mother's body like some species of fish, as some sharks species do give birth to live young, with bull sharks even cannibalizing their siblings in the womb, so there might be some mermaids that give birth to live young & possibly breast feed their children like humans especially if your a fan of Aquatic Ape theory being an explanation for how mermaid evolution might work)! Basically Mermaids don't wear clothes cause they are like fish & probably cause stories of naked women with fish tails was more appealing to sailors who often went on long voyages & were so starved for female companionship, that some mistook Manatees & Dugongs for mermaids! Sure you could argue the entire idea of mermaids may be a perverted male fantasy, but then again not all mermaids were friendly & some were basically sea monsters that took the form of beautiful women or would lead sailors to their doom (sailors were a superstitious lot & considering some considered it bad luck to have a woman onboard a ship, one could imagine that line of thinking leading some men to view mermaids as bad luck for the same reasons, which come to think of it was probably for the best, as I imagine having a single female onboard a ship full of men sounds like a potential recipe for disaster, human or mermaid, though at least in the mermaid's case she could flee by jumping ship & swimming away)!

@truthseeker9249

4 ай бұрын

@@velvety2006 Another reason why the 2003 remake was actually really nice. Not only because they made it a strong love story between Peter and Wendy but in that scene Peter protected Wendy from the mermaid trying to drown her.

As a kid, I can say I did not notice or care. I just loved the mermaids

@leo887

4 ай бұрын

I love mermaids too

Terrifying how Disney went from "insinuating toplessness is bad" to "Every single Disney product must include sexuality and knowing the orientation of each character.

Peter: Hey, girls, I see you’re wearing seashells and sea stars now. Mermaids: Well, we’d like to start a new custom. Our hair and necklaces are just too loose.

To be honest, I never really saw anyone complain about the mermaids, but I'd believe it.

It amazes me sometimes how while I do understand the thoughts behind this as an adult, it also has never occurred to me to notice this detail. Not as a kid and not as an adult 🤨 part of me wonders why it matters this much

@the_last_ballad

Жыл бұрын

When you have hangups about something, it becomes something you focus on. It's why in some cultures ankles and elbows were considered indecent to show, while others male and female breasts were not regarded as being different levels of indecent. My question is why a part of anatomy which children are required to interact with for the first few years of their lives are regarded as indecent for children to see, but male nipples aren't.

@Dejected_Child

Жыл бұрын

@@the_last_ballad because the female body is constantly sexualized for no reason. sad society we live in

JUST CALL THEM BREASTS IT IS NOT HARD

@davidwesley2525

6 ай бұрын

The Narrator Can't Say Breasts or Boobs Because They're Naughty Words. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Do people not realize that the “target audience” aka five year olds don’t care or even notice these things.

A child wouldn’t understand the fact that their bare chested, people need to stop freaking out over woman’s chest

@InternetMameluq

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, women have other organs we can complain about.

“Upper private parts”? Ok I know women shield their nips but I really wouldn’t call them private parts

Tbh, I've never even noticed it in the first movie, I just felt sorry for Wendy, who was so excited to see mermaids, only to have them be jerks to her for no reason 😕

@sadespain01

Жыл бұрын

They were jerks because they liked Peter Pan. Just like Tinkerbell did

Boomers - "DoNt Be A sNoWfLaKe!" Also Boomers - "BOOBS?!"

"Did you know in Peter Pan 2..." There's a Peter Pan 2?!

Bro just call them their name at this point-

Boobs in an art museum (nobody panics) because it's all part of the plan. Boobs in animated media(everyone loses their mind). Upset the established order. Introduce a little anarchy.

@marcandrewtopno8226

Жыл бұрын

"The thing about Chaos is That it's fair"

@sadespain01

Жыл бұрын

Media has different standards and regulations than art. Also, some people feel more comfortable with more modesty, regardless of whether it's accurate or not.

I can’t believe you didn’t mention the fact that Peter did mature a little …

Did you know this is actually an underrated Disney sequel? Sure it's not the original, but it's still the same characters with the new character written well, has a nice musical score, and the animation is spectacular!

"upper private parts" Sir the word you were looking for is "chest". Everyone has a chest, some are just rounder and bigger than others.

Upper private parts? I've heard many things over the years but this is truly a first

Other people: "Wow, that's a neat detail!" Me: "There's a Peter Pan 2?"

"Upper private parts" as a women never call them that again EW. Do we call Adams apples upper private parts? no. so gross

I think that not having actual clothes makes it more like they happen to exist and have breasts while making sure that they have bras makes it sexualized that they exist and have breasts

@rawdasalmataman7908

Жыл бұрын

I don't think it works that way

@Dejected_Child

Жыл бұрын

​@@rawdasalmataman7908 got a better explanation?

@rawdasalmataman7908

Жыл бұрын

@@Dejected_Child I mean without bras they still look like they have breasts At least that's for me

@Dejected_Child

Жыл бұрын

@@rawdasalmataman7908 oh no the original commenter meant to emphasize the sexualization part, not the looking like they have breasts part

@rawdasalmataman7908

Жыл бұрын

@@Dejected_Child Yes I understand The original commenter meant the sexualization in the second movie is more obvious than the first movie , am I right?

I love Return to Never Land (2002).

I loved Peter Pan as a child. I didn’t know (besides the mermaid covering her boobs with her hair) that they didn’t have tops of any sort on. It never crossed my mind- even watching the movie recently. It was never an issue and it didn’t need to be “fixed”. The mermaids from the first movie look more “realistic” as to what most think of mermaids anyways

That is the most cursed thumbnail

“Upper private parts”? I’m glad I’m not the only one who was bothered by this lol

@creepy-kitty

Жыл бұрын

Men have sexualized us to the point that area isn't even remembered for it's main purpose of why they are different from the chest of a man and we have to either embrace them and be called a slut or hide them in shame but still get harassed none the same sad...

Seriously, why is it that mermen are allowed to be topless but mermaids aren't?! Sheesh, the hypocrisy...

I didn’t even know there was a Peter Pan 2 😭

I was too busy being down bad for tinkerbell to notice the mermaids

I never knew Peter Pan had a sequel.

@Hyper_Drud

Жыл бұрын

It was a straight-to-video sequel afaik. There was also Lion King II: Simba’s Pride, Lady & the Tramp 2: Scamp’s Adventure, Hunchback of Notre-Dame II and The Little Mermaid 2: Return to the Sea.

@eljaminlatour6633

Жыл бұрын

@@Hyper_Drud I did watch Lion King 2, it's the best. But I don't know why Disney has to endlessly make sequels for literally anything.

People make breasts sexualized, it’s simply there for females to be able to feed their babies, not for men or other women to enjoy them. It’s a part of the human body..deal with it.

@gracel6206

Жыл бұрын

You're completely wrong, breasts are also a sexual organ to show maturity in females. It's a good thing that men are attracted to a sign of adulthood. Men cannot help feeling attracted to breasts because evolution shaped their minds that way. If men weren't attracted to the markers of adulthood then we'd have a problem 💀

@peterbear4413

7 ай бұрын

Not entirely true. They are, in fact, secondary erogenous zones, in both males and females.

No, it was still correct in the first movie. Mermaids and Sirens were first depicted as creatures that wore nothing. Disney added the shells because the parents were too sensitive about their toddlers, plus general change of design for the second run of the story, as it adds to the magic and family-friendly ideals disney wants.

@fieryvampish

Жыл бұрын

So the video is right, but the parents were still heavily in the wrong for criticizing a children’s movie on being mythically accurate 💀💀💀

Even as an adult, I didn't think much of the mermaids in the original.

"Upper Private Parts" God help us

@davidwesley2525

6 ай бұрын

The Narrator was TOO Much of a Prude to Say BOOBS . 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅

“Upper private parts” Bro, just never approach a woman. Please.

Don’t think they’re upper parts should be sexualized in the first place but whatever, I mean it would make sense, they’re mermaids, they don’t need clothes, because they’re mermaids, it looks fine and completely went over my head whenever it was on screen as a kid

ok: When I was young, like 5 years I never noticed that the mermaids from Peter Pan 1 had nothing on their chest.

Gen Z: Peter Pan's depiction of Natives is racist and the mermaids are really mean. Boomers: CARTOON BOOBIES COVERED UP BY NOTHING BUT HAIR AND NECKLACES IS A DISGRACE!!!

@sadespain01

Жыл бұрын

I'm gonna say that both are wrong

ah yes. THAT was the character designs of peter pan that people are uncomfortable with. Nothing else....not at all...

So the fact they tried to drown Wendy was fine but not having bras even with no visible nudity was where the line was?

Okay The people in the comments saying that people need to stop freak out over women 's chest like what? Also it is good the animators changed it no need for people to make a fuss over it or say stupid things like these

Why!! Why does the opening of the video make me wish I was the girl

i mean, mermaids don't get bras tho.. they live underwater, but i get it.

These moms don't realize that the kids won't even even notice, they're the only ones who did 😂

Any teacher making fun of students for asking questions doesn't deserve to be a teacher.

Yeah

@dandycrow2821

Жыл бұрын

There has never been criticism about this of the mermaids or about the mermaid in general, there's nothing about it on movie trivias, not on IMDb, nor on Wikipedia, not on Disney Wiki! He made it up! Neo-puritan Disney under Micheal Eisner and Bob Iger simply created a problem and then "fixed" it! I also remind you that the age target audience of the older Disney animated movies was more mature than the one more recent from Micheal Eisner to Bob Iger eras, and I also remind you that (non-canon and unsuccesful) Peter Pan 2: Return To Neverland was made by the more kid-friendly and defunct DisneyToon Studios!

My dumbass: THERES PETER PAN 2!?!?!?

Who's gonna tell em children don't sexualize things the way they do?

*The Waffle House has found it’s new host*

@probablyaclown1796

Жыл бұрын

the waffle house has found it’s new host

@krisSkele666

Жыл бұрын

It's over buddy, he's said it's time to stop, go to a waffle house or diner near by, and give em a good tip. Time to stop.

@Creepystalker102

Жыл бұрын

NPC spotted

The Waffle House has found its new host

@uni.-.5067

Жыл бұрын

The Waffle House has found its new host

Movie: *has hair and wreaths covering their upper body parts* My memory: *have them wearing actual clothes like Ariel*

As a child, I hadn’t even noticed that. It’s parents that make it sexual.

The waffle house has found it’s new host

@Cate1st

Жыл бұрын

The Waffle House has found it’s new host

@ForggyFan

Жыл бұрын

The Waffle House has found it’s new host

@retro3188

Жыл бұрын

@@ForggyFan ?

The first peter pan is kinda bad all around, but again a cherished movie in my heart

@dandycrow2821

Жыл бұрын

There has never been criticism about this of the mermaids or about the mermaid in general, there's nothing about it on movie trivias, not on IMDb, nor on Wikipedia, not on Disney Wiki! He made it up! Neo-puritan Disney under Micheal Eisner and Bob Iger simply created a problem and then "fixed" it! I also remind you that the age target audience of the older Disney animated movies was more mature than the one more recent from Micheal Eisner to Bob Iger eras, and I also remind you that (non-canon and unsuccesful) Peter Pan 2: Return To Neverland was made by the more kid-friendly and defunct DisneyToon Studios!

@TariotFrog

Жыл бұрын

@@dandycrow2821 They were racist as fuck to the native americans

@dandycrow2821

Жыл бұрын

@@TariotFrog Too bad they were simply faithful to the source material and faithful to the comedic nature of the Disney version at the same time, and too bad they weren't even real Native Americans but "Indians" natives of Neverland figment of the imagination of 1800s/early 1900s British children. Someone here didn't inform themselves before embarassing themselves with mere feelings and ignorance instead of facts and information you could easily find on IMDb trivia and Disney Wiki. And I'm sure you watch South Park and Family Guy, though. Nice try, normie clown. 🤡🐑🐂💩

@TariotFrog

Жыл бұрын

@@dandycrow2821 bestie this isnt reddit

As someone who watched these movies religiously as a child I never once noticed that they were just mermaids living life minding their business

Another change: Tinkerbell no longer has the measurements of Marilyn Monroe, one of the reasons why is because most actresses who played Tinkerbell in Disneyworld aren't built like that.

It might not be only for that reason. By the time Peter Pan 2 came out The Little Mermaid had pretty much set everyone's expectations of what a mermaid looks like, and they wear the seashells.

Moms: YOU CAN NOT BE WATCHING THIS

My Headcanon is that they simply realised that going topless in an island with immortal prepubescent boys isn't gonna sit right in their conscience, no matter which legend they originate from

@retro3188

Жыл бұрын

Still reeks of victim-blaming. The mermaids have my support and sympathy.

Since when is boobs considered private parts. I always thought that was what was between our legs. Women don't want breasts to be sexualized then why do we call boobs private parts. Make it make sense. When you go in most museums you're bound to see breasts in a painting or sculpture.

@theduckyninja1086

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, like cis men can have boobs too, but no one tells a man to hide his man boobs lmao

Wait until they find out Peter pan gets the lost boys to fight for his own entertainment 💀

I watched this as a kid and HARDLY remember the mermaids

What's weird is, why would a mermaid wear anything to cover their breasts? Mermaids wouldn't know what clothing or modesty is. So they wouldn't cover up.

I can’t imagine the pain women go through having to cover two parts of their body

I never even noticed they were topless till I was an adult. To be honest I think the clam shells actually brought more attention to that area and made me question why Ariel was wearing them as a kid because I literally didn't know what they were covering. I didn't question it in Peter Pan cause I just never knew there was anything to question. Oddly enough even as an adult I still question the clam shells but I've never wandered about what they were trying to cover, my question was instead how she can even wear them. I just always imagined they'd be really uncomfortable. Sea weed would probably be better to make cloths out of.