Vivobook S 15 with X Elite 78 SKU ➡ geni.us/9hFgu4Y Surface Laptop 7 with X Elite 80 SKU ➡ geni.us/LtjLsad Samsung Book4 Edge with X Elite 84 SKU ➡ geni.us/55LmUGu

@mrhastorilikebhop

Ай бұрын

e love your content

@s-trapYT

Ай бұрын

@MaxTechOfficial When testing Lightroom, please connect laptops to 4K monitors and see if sliders in development mode are not lagging. Development mode is sensitive to resolution and for many people fluent developent mode will be more important than exporting speed.

@JohnCross-rz5uq

Ай бұрын

Very nice to see a review of Windows computers, I hope to see many more test reviews of Windows computers, thank you

@raminpro9765

Ай бұрын

we want you compair AMD RYZEN AI 370. vs. xelite ,,,,, i am sure Amd still best for render,gaming and cooler than intel,qualcom

@jlparcerisa

Ай бұрын

@@raminpro9765 Totally agree with this!, an AMD Ryzen 7840U should fare MUCH better then the Intel one

If Qualcomm can sort out their GPU performance then they'll really compete with Intel and Apple.

@gabrielangel1996

Ай бұрын

I'll wait for the second gen of x-elite. A GPU better than a 1060 in a laptop will be awesome. Hope Samsung book 360 uses the second gen x elite

@Silent.killer_007

Ай бұрын

They will in the next gen, Currently they are using 2x powerful version of 8gen2 gpu which is weak by pc standards Rumors are that x elite 2 will use more powerful version of 8gen4 gpu , which can have upto 2x performance of m3 gpu (8gen4 gpu is rumored to be on par with m3 gpu) Currently 8gen3 gpu is more powerful than m1.

@gabrielangel1996

Ай бұрын

@@Silent.killer_007 I'll definitely buy the second gen. X86 for laptops for me its dead

@Silent.killer_007

Ай бұрын

@@gabrielangel1996 i won't say x86 is dead yet, lunar lake is extremely promising in efficiency. They are targeting 15-20w of tdp and gpu will surpass m4💀 And for x elite gen2, it will have the most powerful cpu in windows without a doubt because they will also use ARM V9 SME instructions which apple m4 is using, which can boost its single core performance close to 4000 points in geekbench 6. And x elite 2 "may be" announced in october of this year along with 8gen4 (8gen4 is confirmed in october) because they announced x elite with 8gen3 in previous year

@lesleyhaan116

Ай бұрын

⁠​⁠@@Silent.killer_007 8gen3 gpu is more powerful than the M1 wow impressive the M1 is 4 years old with the M4 M4 Pro M4 Max and M4 ultra coming anytime soon

*CPU Performance of XElite :* 🗿 *GPU performance of XElite :* 🤡

@hmmm1482

Ай бұрын

Neural Performance of X Elite:

@nchtblut

Ай бұрын

xd

@mr.spokesman5849

Ай бұрын

explain pls ... can't get the emoji joke 😕

@thegorn

Ай бұрын

@@mr.spokesman5849The first emoji is a stone statue of a strong and masculine man. It represents excellent results. The clown represents laughable results.

@mr.spokesman5849

Ай бұрын

@@thegorn thx Gorn!

The heat and fan noise from the Intel chips is the main problem for all my customers. None of them need massive CPU power, just enough to run Office programs. As soon as Lenovo, Acer, Dell etc start releasing more reasonably priced ARM laptops, all my customers will shift to ARM based laptops. I hope for Intel they have a business plan for surviving without the pc marked.

@nathanfranck5822

Ай бұрын

Yeah they've been anticipating this for a while and are inviting ARM designers to use their fabs... Not ideal for them but they should survive, especially since they are local to the US and tarrifs are looking to get worse

@oadka

19 күн бұрын

@@nathanfranck5822 what if Intel themselves releases an ARM chip.... this possibility cannot be completely ruled out.

@RayhaanKhan-mu4qu

17 күн бұрын

@@oadka Yes, absolutely... I am very much looking forward for this.

@hernanortega7006

5 күн бұрын

I wanna more CPU power!

@dt1133

6 сағат бұрын

Just limit the processor via windows energy configuration to a lower percentaje like 70% and you are done no more fan sounds

I am impressed with X Elite, not by its performance or battery life, but price. $500 USD cheaper than Intel. I hope that $1,000 barrier will be broken soon.

@christianr.5868

Ай бұрын

Maybe with the surface go?

@RA-nm9xu

Ай бұрын

Or as mentioned in yesterday's video; The Macbook Air M1 for $699. After 4 years it still competes well, and with a much lower price.

@naoton201

Ай бұрын

The unit is optimize for 4 years straight ​@@RA-nm9xu

@aibi5532

Ай бұрын

​@@RA-nm9xu again it's macOS 50 to 60 percent software aren't available for mac

@vinoo882010

Ай бұрын

​@@aibi5532as an IT consultant most people buying a laptop at that price point wont be running into thid issue.

Me waiting for a 75Wh battery on the Snapdragon X Plus for ultimate battery life.

@frankwong9486

Ай бұрын

99wh , vapor chamber cooling , with 16 inch oled will get great

@rajbhararyan4746

Ай бұрын

​@@frankwong9486vapour chamber for such low TDP are u kidding

@frankwong9486

Ай бұрын

@@rajbhararyan4746 100w isn't that low , lower temp = more room for boost clock before hitting thermal limit/ fan need to rev up There are different kind of VC + /VC+ fin stack for different TDP value You can found VC on smartphone, on laptop like Samsung ultra book / dell XPS and it been proved have better cooling capacity than regular heat pipe+fin stack cooling So, why not ?

@yuvrajsingh099

Ай бұрын

​@@frankwong9486G16 2024 need this chips. It has full capability to run snapdragon x elite 84 at full 80 watt. It's battery with core ultra is 12 hours , it will be more higher. The chip does support discrete gpu that will fix the weak integrated gpu.

@vlvdy

Ай бұрын

​@@rajbhararyan4746 for less throttling

This is the only comparison that matters… the Mac vs windows comparisons are the most pointless reviews. Most people have an operating system they prefer and aren’t going to switch. Me being windows myself with having a history with Mac and never going back, I don’t care how “close” the performance is against Mac… I care how much quicker it is than the previous generation of itself.

@DielsonSales

Ай бұрын

True, although there are people always in the fence, the overwhelming majority are used to the software and workflow on their current OS. Still, competition only improves things for consumers.

@BobRooney290

3 күн бұрын

hah, i dont even care about the platform. these are laptops meant for working on the go. people are kidding themselves if they think they are getting the performance of workstation/mac pro cheese grater.

Intel one consumes more power when sleeping than the X Elite watching KZread.

@sophieedel6324

Ай бұрын

Who buys a $1,300 laptop to watch youtube videos. You might as well get a $200 chromebook that consumes even less power. The real battery drain happens when doing heavy tasks, and x86 chips are simply more performant, taking less time, therefore draining less battery life.

@elderman64

Ай бұрын

​@@sophieedel6324 Valid, but you missed some common sense. People can do both, watch YT vids or do intensive tasks on their laptop. It's not an either or situation

@DS-Pakaemon

Ай бұрын

@@sophieedel6324 "x86 chips are simply more performant, taking less time, therefore draining less battery life" That's an insane statement to make.

@sophieedel6324

Ай бұрын

@@DS-Pakaemonx86 are more performant than ARM chips, due to the extended x86 instruction sets. There is nothing "insane" about it. If one has to do a heavy workload, x86 will finish that task sooner, and end up using up less battery life than ARM. If you only watch videos or browse the web, yes I'm sure ARM is more battery efficient, and RISC-V is more battery efficient still. But I would hope a $1,300 laptop is not being bought just to browse the web and watch youtube videos, a $200 chromebook can do that too.

@williammaverick

Ай бұрын

@@sophieedel6324 Doesn't change the fact X Elite consumes a lot less than Intel when sleeping & streaming. Also unlike you, I don't assume how people actually use their laptops. Secondly, $200 chromebooks have shitty TN panel 760p, non-existent contrast screens and loads videos very slowly. You act like one would get a similar experience using that and a $1300 with 2.5k MiniLED high contrast screens.

I don’t think the Elite will compete with Lunar Lake. As it looks right now, this could compete and surpass this in efficiency (crazy to say this about Intel). Especially in GPU performance Lunar Lake will stomp this…

Even in the unlikely scenario that ARM will take over the x86 market, Intel has future proofed itself by building fabs that will feature the new ASML High NA-EUV lithography machines. They won't have an issue building other companies ARM chips because that's a software instruction set, not a hardware issue.

@louiswilliamterminator2887

Ай бұрын

Sooooo Intelvjust needs to learn to compete in a market that it doesn't dominate and maintain tye position through bullying and illegal practices, but being efficient and innovating. They're doomed. Oh well, what's on Netflix? 🤣

@nathanfranck5822

Ай бұрын

Intel definitely setting up to abandon their own designs ❤ Microsoft should take note - next version of Windows should be Linux

@stefanbucur6472

Ай бұрын

@@nathanfranck5822 Anything for survival. Intel can teach you a thing or two

@stefanbucur6472

Ай бұрын

@@nathanfranck5822 Anything for survival. Intel could teach you a thing or two

@stefanbucur6472

Ай бұрын

@@nathanfranck5822 Anything for survival. You could lear n a thin g or two from Intel

The more of these tests I see of x86 CISC versus ARM RISC I'm beginning to think Intel basically set computing back 2 decades by killing all of the competition with marketing and market manipulation. Had ARM or PPC or some other RISC based chip been able to compete with x86 through the 90s and 00s at the same level of developer integration as x86 the computing world would look vastly different than it does today!

@kesannwalrond-mcclean9781

Ай бұрын

Agreed. I remember being in high school / early college and hearing how risc could never handle the complex workloads of cisc

@kaptnwelpe5322

Ай бұрын

Guess what - its NOT that ARM on Windows will suceed this time because it is technically better but because it is CHEAPER. Of course the alternatives in the 90s were better ( like a MIPS based SGI O2 which had a crossbar ... ) - but those we niche computers with a price tag.

@hyperpedro2868

Ай бұрын

This is the end of the 5% yearly improvements made by Intel to justify buying a new machine. I don't know if they will recover.

@MrEiniweini

Ай бұрын

A little oversimplified don't you think? ARM was used in the 1st gen iPhone from what..2007? So that is 17 years where you had a computer in your pocket. Apple had a three year transition to ARM that pissed a lot of people off because they disabled 32 bit, but Apple makes it's money from phones rather that computers for the most part so they could absorb the hit to the pocket. The only other company I can think of that could absorb that financial hit for the transition is Samsung. MS played with ARM but gave it up until Apple hit the market. You are thinking fun shit on your PC and they are thinking market share. The only reason Apple ran with it was because they had no gamer market to lose. They were all about professionals. Even now the graphics performance on the X Elite is 1/2 of the iMacs, so what do they gain today? You are in a bubble, sorry. If NASA was at peak, absolutely the ARM chip would have developed further because every bit of power is life in space but here on earth we have power sockets.

@JulioCesar-oh6mw

Ай бұрын

just wait for inter lunar lake w'll be very good at battery

Should mention X Elite battery is smaller compared to the one in Intel

eager to see comparison when Luna Lake launch and against the Zen 5 mobile from AMD as well.

@talison461

Ай бұрын

amd will launch their arm chips in 2025 and it will DESTROY snapdragon!!!

@RyanUniverseZ

Ай бұрын

​@@talison461Yeah the Xelite By then we'll have Xelite Gen 2 or something lmaoo

@yujilee112

Ай бұрын

​@@talison461 if you want gpu performance might as well goes for nvidia because they gonna release windows on arm next year as well.

@truthmatters7573

Ай бұрын

I'm especially curious about that comparison too.. I think Zen 5 will be the superior choice overall.

@sihamhamda47

Ай бұрын

@@RyanUniverseZ Maybe also X elite pro with more cores as well

OMG - a Snapdragon Surface GO will run circles around their old Intel based predecessors... . Hope we get that fantastic new BT keyboard too...

@weinbergfahrer4048

Ай бұрын

That's a machine I'm *eagerly* looking forward to!

Ай бұрын

Not sure how much demand there will be for a $400 keyboard for the Surface Go. (The version for the Surface Pro is $450, but a smaller one for the Surface Go will probably cost a bit less.) Even if that price includes the pen.

X Elite is great at beating last years laptops... In 2 months it's gonna be faced with AMD Strix and Intel Lunarlake. Both will be superior.

@adityadevelopment3435

Ай бұрын

this is why competition is good. no body wants to be defeated, said michael jackson..

@auritro3903

Ай бұрын

Normal people shouldn't expect X Elite to immediately wipe the floor. Like Intel ARC, the first generation might be rough. But consequent generations will be a lot better. The only problem I have is that unlike Intel ARC, Qualcomm was hyping it up to be an M3 Pro destroyer, even though it was more like an Intel/AMD competitor.

While ARM is cool, it still needs some time for all the apps to work on it. I am more interested in the next generation since that is probably when we won’t have see a problem with apps because of the x86 architecture.

@angusmatheson9997

Ай бұрын

Windows RT came out October 2012. How much time does windows need to optimize Windows off ARM?

@gabrielangel1996

Ай бұрын

​@@angusmatheson9997it's not windows, its the developer and Qualcomm drivers. Even on emulation x-elite is winning.

@gabrielangel1996

Ай бұрын

Same here, I'll wait for x-elite 2. Probably a better GPU and CPU and software integration.

@christianr.5868

Ай бұрын

@@angusmatheson9997yup, windows is fine, emulation is fine. It’s in dev’s hands now

@lesleyhaan116

Ай бұрын

⁠@@gabrielangel1996 it’s all thanks to Apple they hired engineers from Intel and Google and developed the M1 chips that did release in 2020 Qualcomm was blown away and had no competing product those engineers from Intel and Google who worked for Apple did leave Apple and started there own chip company Nuvia to develop and make sever chips Qualcomm acquired Nuvia and that’s how they made the X-Elite without Apple there would be no X-Elite we would still have the SQ3 SQ4 chips

Whats the performance of the intel version when plugged in? Would it be comparable or better? Just to get the full picture

The Surface 7 CPU is actually 3.4ghz, not 4.0. It can do a temporary boost to 4.0ghz, but it normally runs at 3.4ghz.

@Havanu81

Ай бұрын

All x86 cpu's have adaptive boost as well, and market them as such. Apples to apples

@lennart5738

Ай бұрын

Yes and the boost clocks are also more so for single-threaded applications. Not for multi-threaded compute-heavy tasks like benchmarks, video encoding, CPU rendering or physics simulation

@harryniedecken5321

Ай бұрын

The surface is still not capable of everything that is done on a real computer.

@williamcopeland2617

Ай бұрын

@@harryniedecken5321 You mean the Surface with the ARM processor.

@williamcopeland2617

Ай бұрын

@@harryniedecken5321 You mean the Surface with the ARM CPU, not the Intel version. Come on now brotha!

The competitor will be Lunar Lake. That should level out the X Elite advantage.

@justinnl4332

Ай бұрын

Naaah

@jayvee8502

Ай бұрын

I think it's AMD Strix point/Strix Halo

Lunar Lake will be more interesting

@lesleyhaan116

Ай бұрын

Why?

@christianr.5868

Ай бұрын

I’ve got my doubts about that chip. But it’ll be cool if it can live up to what they’re saying it can do. It’s lacking things like hyper threading though

@lorenzocorsomusic1308

Ай бұрын

@@christianr.5868 yeah would be really fun to see x86 being able to compete :) Hyperthreading uses more power and since they’re going all in with power efficiency I guess and they’re still getting a good amount of IPC improvement. Let’s hope intel keeps their word and we’ll get amazing chips to compete as that always the best for us ;)

@lorenzocorsomusic1308

Ай бұрын

@@lesleyhaan116 much more designed like apples m chips and how the processor is built. Have a look at some demos where a 4k 60fps video only uses 2/3 Watts on Lunar Lake and about 20/25 on Meteor Lake

@auritro3903

Ай бұрын

@@lorenzocorsomusic1308 i think that's for encoding if im not wrong, gaming performance is still really impressive(leaks suggest that Xe2 gets the same performance as Strix 880M while using HALF the power)

Should be interesting when the Lunar Lake version of these Windows Surfaces and others comes out. I would expect the benchmarks to jump ahead of X Elite. Especially GPU tasks.

@williamcopeland2617

Ай бұрын

It'll be interesting to see. By then, the Snapdragon chipset will be much better optimized and Devs will start taking advantage of that 4tf GPU.

@gabrielangel1996

Ай бұрын

Graphics wise will be better, for sure. But CPU wise i really doubt. Lunar lake has 8 cores with 4 of them being e-cores. And Intel has never been good with power efficient.

@williamcopeland2617

Ай бұрын

@@gabrielangel1996 Remember, these new Intel CPU's will have a completely different architectural design which will be significantly more efficient then the current. Can't wait to see the differences.

@gabrielangel1996

Ай бұрын

@@williamcopeland2617 the same blabla happended with meteor lake. Do you really believe a word intel says about battery life?

@delta0307

Ай бұрын

yes and a dead battery in 3 hours lol

Which one would be stronger with excel?

I have been consistently looking for people to do heavy work on excel on these laptops. I feel business and consulting people are going to make use of a machine like this which offers really good battery efficiency for long hours of traveling.

@iikatinggangsengii2471

4 күн бұрын

i would buy snapdragon for fun, if they somehow can integrate all phone apps to it, like gp story on laptops, sick

AMD Strix and Intel Lunar Lake series will probably be more efficient than X Elite while being stronger

@grigorkyokuto7546

Ай бұрын

being actually useful

@3:42 says Chrome but the tests were run in edge seconds after

For longer tests with both fans on, it makes a difference which Laptop is right or left, depending which one gets the cool air or the exhausted hot one from the other laptop!!

This is what the discussion should have always been about. What good are those powerful intel and amd laptoos if they fall apart when you unplug them? Laptops are supposed to be portable and mobile.

Used not to care about the fan noise but that changed while at University as it was so distracting when my DELL Inspiron laptop which was a 2 in 1 could just randomly decide to fire its jet engines😅. Everyone in the room would look at me. I definitely sold it off a quick as I could 😅 Currently have a Lenovo and that makes less fan noise 🙂 Hope too get a Mac in future.

@christianr.5868

Ай бұрын

M1 MacBook Air is like $600 and it’s still solid 👌🏾

This is the exact video I wanted but was too lazy to comment and request

also that cinebench score makes no sense what was the average power consumotion and clockspeed of that intel cpu because no wat is that cpu scoring 550 at 50w you can get that score with amd 8840u running at 16w,please check that

@MaxTechOfficial

Ай бұрын

50W was the peak, it then ran at 30W and by the end dipped to low 20’s

@malathomas6141

Ай бұрын

@@MaxTechOfficial ah that explains it

Only thing i'm interested in at this point is overall power efficiency and battery duration. I still have my X1 Carbon 5 generation i got around 2018 with no need to upgrade. As of right now there is a T14s generation 4 AMD and T14s generation 6 Snapdragon i'm interested in but Snapdragon still fairly new and doubtful of Linux support

Are those GPU benchmarks ARM versions already?

Can you please add a comparison of WSL2 performance? For example for a larger Node.js project.

Max, please, do a video comparison for anti-reflective coating quality between various Mac/windows laptops you have access to. The problem is that glossy screens hardly usable when working with text unless they have proper anti reflective coating. It's especially relevant nowadays, when dark mode supported in most of the apps, and even macOS/Windows support it now. When you use dark mode app with text (source code, web page, article, spreadsheet data) and your screen just cheap glossy, you see a mix of text and reflections, just a mess...

@williamcopeland2617

Ай бұрын

If you are working indoors, you won't have a problem with the Surface Laptop. The Surface Pro 11 screen blows them all out though. Just make sure to buy it with that OLED screen.

@akyhne

Ай бұрын

It's so funny that when Apple released their XDR Pro display with glossy finish, all Apple fans drooled over the glossy model, but now it's a fight between a Microsoft glossy and an Apple anti-reflective, we're back at glossy being useless. Don't you guys have any standards?!

@jchi6822

Ай бұрын

@williamcopeland2617 , just making screen brighter isn't really good solution, since too bright screen is uncomfortable for the eyes and not recommended health-wise. Plus it would eat laptop battery faster. Also, OLEDs aren't great for everyone - they have PWM flickering, and some people sensitive to it, even to ~1400hz screen pwm. Some windows glossy laptops do have proper anti reflective coating. But really a few.

@williammaverick

Ай бұрын

Simple. Don't use dark mode. Problem solved. I completely do not understand why people code hours on end with a mirror on their face and use a dark theme and make things even worse.

@jchi6822

Ай бұрын

I have Windows laptop at work with glossy screen without proper anti reflective coating, and reflections are quite noticeable even with light themes. It's still relevant issue.

The surface 7 has a larger battery (and higher refresh rate, though it's variable don't know if that saved some power in these tasks). You can never compare business laptops to consumer laptops price-wise, because of service/support, most windows laptops cost the same as their qualcom competitors at launch. Interested to see lunar lake/strix comparisons and next gen qualcom chip, since this one was intended to be for servers.

Snapdragon X Elite 🔋🔋🔋💪

How you instal lightroom classic? I have surface pro with snapdragon x elite and i dont see in adobe Creative cloud?

Was that Blender 4.3 alpha they have in ARM version on the daily builds page?

Thank you VERY much for this, best comparison yet, and actually this is the only in-depth look at the Surface Laptop 6 for Business on the web anywhere yet. I'll get a Laptop 6 next week, bc the SL7 is unfortunately not sold to business yet - so this was especially helpful for me. Ofc I would have loved to get the 7, now even more than before ...

@MF-pn1gg

Ай бұрын

Not true, you can buy a SL7 for business with 11 Win Pro preinstalled ;).

Which one is faster for numerical calculations or simulations: Snapdragon X Plus, Intel Core Ultra 7, or Snapdragon X Elite? Which would be a better choice for a computational biologist? @MaxTechOfficial

After this review I finished my coffee, and got myself a new toy. The keyboard is extraordinary, bit clicky, but this 15 inch screen is good, the battery life so far.... 6% drain. On that note, take a look at the bezels, on the 15" it is really visible. So long for now to Apple, but they will respond in the fall. For now this device cost me 2k including taxes (Canadian), yes I bought the cheapest one and the 1TB drive update is already on its way. Let's see how replaceable it is.

@MaxTechOfficial

Ай бұрын

Hope you enjoy!

The elite x just needs qualcomm/windows firmware and software updates and app optimizing to make it a strong competitor to apple. to at least make it good enough. Next gen should be a blast.

@gabrielangel1996

Ай бұрын

It's just matter of time.

Best reviews brotha. Can't wait for lunar lake, hope it is awesome

The GPU on the X Elite 84 should compare equally with the Intel. It has 4.6 tflops compared to 3.6 tflops on the surface X Elite. Try with Samsung book edge let's see

The x elite really lived up to the hype. Hopefully they sell enough for ARM to become the lead developement platform. Its already good through Prism but would be awesome when everything runs natively on ARM. My samsung galaxy book 4 edge runs apple smooth. I also left it in sleep mode for a few days. Was good to go a second after opening the lid and had only lost a few percent battery. The second gen would benefit from a big graphics upgrade but tbh its not really essential for this type of device as i doubt anyone buys a thin and light to game.

wasnt that speedometer test done on micrsoft edge?

Which one is faster in case of Numerical calculation or Simulations .. Snapdragon X plus, intel Core Ultra 7 or snapdragon X elite... ? Which one will be the better Choice for a Computational Biologists. ??

Is there anything stopping Qualcomm from hooking up an nVIDIA or AMD GPU to the processor over PCIe? Also, what if there was a HW accelerated x86 translation layer, allowing x86 programs to run (as far as the program is concerned) natively? Like it would sit on the data bus in between the CPU and everything else, allowing ARM instructions through but stopping x86 instructions and translating them into a series of ARM instructions. I know there are a lot more complexities, like registers, and extensions, but if possible, I think it would be worth looking into. But I may be wrong. I'm not a computer scientist.

Yes, you are correct that Intel powered laptops come with the "Intel Tax" which places them often considerably more expensive than either AMD or Qualcomm although Mac laptops are outrageously priced way beyond any other manufacture. The new Ai APU from AMD is hitting the market of late and I would like to see their best compared to Qualcomm's best.....Please.....

0:31 it should be 512 GB for the intel model, not 5216.

I've got a Dell XPS15, 2023. I get, wait for it,.. 4 hours battery for normal office usage.

@vlun1215

11 күн бұрын

That was my biggest frustration with windows laptops was battery life and resolution compared to macbook air 15. I am definitely buying the snapdragon laptops as the battery life is way better now.

Why didn't you benchmark while the devices were plugged in? It is obvious that the Intel device reduces the clock speed when it is not plugged in.

Please add lightroom AI denoise as well to your testing in the future. That's a good test for GPU

why use google chrome for testing not Microsoft edge?

Hello for you what IS the best Snap dragon elite laptop ? How do best intégration ?

Gotta think like the regular user. Finally they can get a windows PC without the bullshit that intel have been throwing them. Intel played dirty. Didnt capitalise. Now ARM catches up and delivers. Talk ahout GPU all you want. Most of the people I know arent gaming, rendering in blender or anything like that.

@MrHav1k

Ай бұрын

x86 still has the entire software backlog ARM simply doesn't have. People won't care about the CPU they're using UNTIL half their apps outright don't work or run like garbage because they require emulation.

Pairing a high intel processor with an RTX GPU in a laptop is just unbeatable. Snapdragon processors are based on ARM architecture, while the RTX GPU's are built on the x86 architecture. These architectures are fundamentally different and incompatible. There is just no killing intel or Nvidia.

@iikatinggangsengii2471

4 күн бұрын

true intel and nvidia are 2 biggest semiconductors on their own

Alright and how it does unplugged?

The specs comparison at 0:27 says the Intel has 5126 GB SSD? That's either mistyped or I'm in need of an eye doctor lol.😂

The Intel chip was developed in conjunction with George Foreman Grills

Please reduce aperture on camera when filming computers. I don't need "cinematic", I would like to to see everything in focus and read text.

OK so what's the point of efficiency cores if the ones without any will last 40% longer?

can you also please make tests of Surface Pro? looking for replacement for my SP6 and thinking of the new one

This is the first gen chip, Qualcomm make great GPUs for smartphones (leading GPU In any phone chip). I'm sure we will see significant improvements in terms of GPU performance in upcoming versions.

Meteor lake doesn't matter much anymore. Lunar lake is coming. And amd strix point is launching next month. X elite losing to competition within a couple months of launching will not be a good look.

When can we expect copilot + pc on desktop

Well done to qualcom for a first gen on PC. Maybe intel did not say his last word wait for the next gen. I hope you will compare X elite vs next gen intel and Amd

Microsoft overpriced their laptops and for some reason, laptops manufacturers always include around 45 WH battery capacity on x86 laptops. I’m not sure why, but with competition ramping up, it looks like this is bound to change. Thanks for pointing out the build quality on the Intel laptop vs snapdragon, it kinda proved what I was thinking. Looking forward to AMD AI and Intels Lunar Lake CPU’s. It’s about time they looking more into mobility and providing that all day battery life that MacBook offers.

@NissocoMC

Ай бұрын

I think Microsoft actually has the most reasonably priced base model laptop for snapdragon CPUs

@nick-dogg

Ай бұрын

@@NissocoMCthat’s because it works in their favor to push Qualcomm exclusivity deal with ARM processors.

@riceflakes498

Ай бұрын

@@nick-dogg no its literally leaked in the dell slides that x elite is nearly 100$ cheaper than intel meteor lake 7 processors

@nick-dogg

Ай бұрын

@@riceflakes498 look up the deal Microsoft made with Qualcomm back in 2016, rumors are it’s set to expire at the end of the year. This is why you only have Qualcomm releasing ARM processors for Windows’s

Intel Ultra Core 9 AI Chipset Vs Snapdragon X Elite 84 AI Chipset Vs AMD Ryzzen AI 9 Chipset comparison with 16 inch 16GB/32 GB RAM Laptop would be fair and best which is needed.?

Can the Qualcomm run all software? Is it binary compatible?

One weakness of all Windows on Arm systems: device drivers. If you depend on some unusual peripheral, the odds are it won't work. Drivers MUST be native; emulation isn't supported. That's going to kill the prospects for Arm in a lot of vertical markets.

the only thing that Microsoft needs to do are completely push the app developer to improve on arm chips. so people will consider arm and maybe new manufacturer such as Samsung and mediatek will also joining in in arm PC based CPU market.

0:29 - woah, MTL platform with 5TB SSD for only 400USD more? Jackpot.

Can't x series be paired with dedicated graphics

intel has 5tb ssd ?

Is it possible to have a couple gpu nvidia or amd and Qualcomm snapdragon ?

I'm surprised Qualcomm lost GPU comparison where they should win single handedly.

Great video! Just I find Speedometer quite inconsistent. I got 25 points on my work laptop with i7-1365u in incognito mode. And this is older generation than Intel machine in this test with only 20 points.

You read my mind! Thanks! 🙏

Your graph and audio don't match the SSD benchmark that is shown on the screen. On the screen it says that the Intel SSD was clearly faster than the ARM one.

Intel Airlines at your service

@iikatinggangsengii2471

4 күн бұрын

youtube shopping

microsoft needs to stop playing with stupid designs like the surface duo and do a proper good android phone with full compatibility with windows machines, they would create the perfect ecosystem to compete with apple

@legendaryzfps

Ай бұрын

No because Windows is trash

any laptop with i7 14th gwn rtx 4070 vs x elite plz

@adityadevelopment3435

Ай бұрын

x elite dont have dedicated graph ?

@everythingwithanirudha

Ай бұрын

@@adityadevelopment3435 so it will be 14th Gen vs x elite

Intel is going Nokia way

@louiswilliamterminator2887

Ай бұрын

I'll drink to that!

0:27 5126 GB ???

Can I play black myth wukong in xelite?

Love your videos😍😍😍😍😍

I Stick with x86 its way to early for arm in Windows. Those Things arent compareable. They are completly different working

I’d love to see a comparison between the SL7 snapdragon X elite vs SL7 snapdragon X plus for general snappiness and battery life

ultra 9, 185H vs snapdragon elite, which one more fast ?

@legendaryzfps

Ай бұрын

Snapdragon. But amd beats them both

why not charge them to compare？

It's impressive for ARM chip but i'm going to choose the Intel One. If all apps are optimized for ARM, i'll be changing my opinion. Lunar Lake & Zen 5 are going to be monsters

x86 just needs to be more optimized, ARM catches up BECAUSE the manufacturer put REAL effort to make it fast and competitive with data from millions of devices inside smartphones. x86 gets too comfortable with their dominance without real breakthrough. just as we ever see x86 powered smartphones.

Anyone knows how to install Lightroom Classic on the Snapdragon Surface?!

So I don't understand why intel doesn't just sell off its assets and close up?

Comparing laptop design(touchpad, screen, etc...) has nothing to do with the processor. It is just the next generation laptop -> next intel laptop will have the same. Also, those synthetic tests are kinda skewed, try playing in an app like Adobe PS or Webstorm(real world use-case) and you'll see how the snapdragon struggles, app freezes, crashes etc

QUALCOMM and truth can NOT be used in the same sentence, yo, aren't you in the business long enough to know that!!

Intel launch Lunar Lake based machines that should perform better with lower power

Intel was absolute ass when it had market monopoly. I think getting kicked by Arm is humbling... but real deal would be a riscV processor, which i believe china will definitely adopt...

@legendaryzfps

Ай бұрын

amd silences Intel already

This video is misleading. Only synthetic benchmarks and ARM optimized software is presented. Once Prism emulation is involved the fun stops.