this is more related to unequal kind of voting you could also have picked two candidates that have their preferences twice higher than others for example its a completely different system than every person one vote

This is most in harmony with the Third Principle: We must make absolute the authority of the Great Leader. It is the most democratic system as the Great Leader is best informed to govern for the people.

This needs an explanation?

Around 1:10 it is said “every single other method will rank J. as last”. Instant runoff does not rank the candidates as such, but it will eliminate H. and I before J. . Instant runoff does not rank J. last. Otherwise it's a great video.

@gutzimmumdo4910

2 жыл бұрын

j has 1 vote, therefore, gets eliminated in the first round.

I half expected some defense of dictatorship, or at least something to make us doubt our common opposition to dictatorship via indirect skepticism. Some bring up the idea that a dictator can make decisions faster and not have to deal with political gridlock. A dictator isn't beholden to campaign donors and is less bribable then a politician in a democracy who is contingent on the support of various interest groups to win the election. I don't support this system, but I can see how one can doubt opposition to a dictatorship.

Voter G picked K twice, typo there pal.

@Ggdivhjkjl

4 жыл бұрын

Perhaps he voted informally?