My surname is Pal and my motherland is UP ....we belong to Shepherd cast ....and our cast eat everything..... because my ancestors had only goats and sheep as business no field and farming for feeding the family ...so my ancestors used to sell goat's and sheep's meat milk and wool etc. ....my kuldevi was Mari mata to whome goats sacrifices were given every year .... But from my Dad's generation everything changed....my parents migrated to Mumbai..became huge fan of Krishna ....joined to Pandurang Shastri aathavale Ji's Swadhyay ...now doing office work ...and my own family is pure vegetarian me and my siblings never even ate eggs from our birth ... though my caste belongs to meat eating family but my family never touched even non veg ....so the overall conclusion is everything is based on condition and time factor

@ankitapal1457

6 жыл бұрын

ContriveBrain even plants are living beings and we eat fresh veggies 😏😏, since plants can't express their feelings ....we can eat them ??? In life there will be violence on weaker living beings by stronger living beings ....I feel

@sushilchoudhary875

6 жыл бұрын

Ankita Pal In Hinduism there is a word called ahimsa which means less violence (not non violance) So we should act or eat so that there will be minimum possible violance. Eating plant is less violent than slitting the throat of animals. Killing Osama bin Laden is ahimsa , becoz we kill one to save thousands.

@abhishekgupta4123

6 жыл бұрын

Ankita Pal you got that Right!

@inayaisaac1824

6 жыл бұрын

Sushil Choudhary in Islam an animal has to be slaughtered in less voilent way "zibah"...the way it is done an animal barely feels much pain...thats why the term "Halal" is used....if an animal suffers during slaughter Islam prohibts the meat making it "Haram"

@lkshpnd69

6 жыл бұрын

Ankita Pal ,, best conclusion u have given

One correction as what i've read is that cow only is said to be the creature with multiple gods residing in it and you compared it woth pork. Well, for the pork in islam they don't eat it because it is considered as filthy and for hinduism they don't eat COWS as they are godly.

@kalebj7001

Жыл бұрын

Certain animals became restricted from cuisine owing to their attributes. It could be a socio-economic factor too.. for example, the case with pork is because islam derived much of its dietry and other customs from Judaism, and to them pigs were a pagan food of the cananites and hence the Jews refrained from consuming something the pagans consumed. As to the case of cows in ancient India, it isn't entirely true that the cows were sacred or divinely attested in the society, atleast not till the later Vedic period.. because prior to that in early Vedic era, a person's social status was determined by how many cows he owned.. and rig Vedic texts talk about the pride in waging war and the capture of cattles of the rival tribes.. so cows were valued possesion.. slaughtering them would reduce the numbers and that reflects on ur status.. but that doesn't mean they never ate cows. It was rather a delicacy served only for specific occasions. Especially if the chieftain is marrying of his daughter, then he slaughters the best cow he has for the occasion. There's even a term in ancient text denoting to it Gognha (गोगना), even Panini makes note of this.. and even later texts after later Vedic era mention this practice of consuming the cow (albeit not a common practice but only reserved for occasion) “The cow should be slaughtered on the arrival of a guest, on the occasion of shraddha of ancestors and on the occasion of a marriage.” ~Apastamb Grihsutram (1/3/10)

It's about availability and sacrifice minimum... When you don't have much vegetarian food for all you can eat meat for survival. That's what we been doing from so many years. So the fact is you can eat meat only when it's about your survival. But if you do eat for your tongue taste you are pure evil on earth. And if you think you can get power from eating non vegetarian food you are all wrong. Vali, Hanuman Ram and so on were vegetarian and got immense power.

@winter_silhouette

2 жыл бұрын

So, meat is murder, unless you're hungry and veggies are not available.

@Joyand-cf3so

3 ай бұрын

Even I think having meat for taste is pure evil but think wisely mann in india agriculture land is so low u cannot feed these over exploit population through only veggies During ramanyan era there is not much population as today so think both way

I remember to lines of a song from film CHITRALEKHA, which suits Hinduism beat as it is the only religion which had changed & adjusted as per changing needs These lines are "ये पाप है क्या ये पुण्य है क्या, रीतों पर धर्म की मोहरें हैं। हर युग में बदलते धर्मो से, कैसे तुम साथ निभाओगे।।" But Hindus & Hinduism did it. 👍👍👍👍🙏🙏🙏🙏

Devdutt is a true hindu. He explained "Vasudheva kutumbakam" in a interesting way

@honest_bishop5905

4 жыл бұрын

He is wrong about vegetarianism not being a virtue. Bhishma says to yudhishthira on his deathbed that the highest virtue on earth is for a meat eater to give up his meat.

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

@@honest_bishop5905 yes and also krishna said in gita that we shouldn't consume animals

@tureatheist5451

3 жыл бұрын

devdutt is a fool or he is a secular jihadi.

@jebaattau886

2 жыл бұрын

He is a propagandist

@vioinbhandsri3074

2 жыл бұрын

Nah he is not he is working under andre trusgke you guys are ralaky stuoid

people now days don't have intentions of learning anything, everyone just want to justify what's in their head

@mohitKumar-bd8fp

2 жыл бұрын

I think he also is teaching only what is in his head.so everyone is entitled to their own opinion

Our body is the emobodiement of temple, it is purely symbolic, which represents we must be satvik, our body is a temple of god, our body is not Garbage to fullfil all types of nonveg, this is what ancient Hindu ideology have thought us, hindu temples describes us to keep awaken when we enter inside the temple. the perceptions of Hindus idea are true masterpiece. what ever the past is, experience yourself, difference bitween meat and veg, knowyourself, you will the gods and universe.

@prashantp495

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/hpl2ls5mpq3Wf8Y.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/g4Fmj5KbpNe2h9I.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZKycl7Cigdy1lLQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/doCty9affK2cps4.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/gZOf0NamnZWWc5M.html

@VedicDharam

2 жыл бұрын

gita clearly says that meat is part of tamsik diet. tamsik is the demonic nature. it doesnt lead you closer to god. one has to change his character and diet towards a satvik movement to come more closer to god. you will not find anyone serving meat at the temple or prasad etc.... the gita clearly says this. if you eat meat as a hindu then it is your choice but do not defame hinduism. namaste

Wow gr8 concept of this series and Devdutt is a brilliant man

@VedicDharam

2 жыл бұрын

gita clearly says that meat is part of tamsik diet. tamsik is the demonic nature. it doesnt lead you closer to god. one has to change his character and diet towards a satvik movement to come more closer to god. you will not find anyone serving meat at the temple or prasad etc.... the gita clearly says this. if you eat meat as a hindu then it is your choice but do not defame hinduism. namaste

it's very informative sir.. thank u

Always love ur thoughts....

Good video. Like the content.

Thank you for talking about it

Very comprehensive👌🏻👌🏻

@VedicDharam

2 жыл бұрын

gita clearly says that meat is part of tamsik diet. tamsik is the demonic nature. it doesnt lead you closer to god. one has to change his character and diet towards a satvik movement to come more closer to god. you will not find anyone serving meat at the temple or prasad etc.... the gita clearly says this. if you eat meat as a hindu then it is your choice but do not defame hinduism. namaste

Vegeterianism was advised by the Saints and Sages of yore as a direct means of developing a sattvic body/mind state of being. It is therefore imperative for anyone earnestly practicing any type of Yoga to consider adopting a vegeterian diet as it will help you make progress to your desired destination greatly. After one reaches their destination and they attain divine union with the source than it does not matter what they consume.

@anirbanroy8601

11 ай бұрын

Does any major Sanatan scripture say about sanatanis do not consume non veg(ie meat fish and egg) ? As per my understanding of scriptures till now Hindu Sanatanis can be Non-veg. If you know otherwise, Please quote from scriptures with chapter and shloka number.

Its a good and informative video. Plz if in future, we could have more videos like this in vernacular languages, so more audience it could reach. But very good initiative. Keep it up.

@sushilchoudhary875

6 жыл бұрын

Neha Lochan Completely Fake information. From which Christian missionaries this man belongs to? In Vedas it is written that we should not harm animals or eat animals. Same way in Jainism and Buddhism meat is not allowed. Meat is common in West becoz they don't have any other protein source. India is rich in veg protein .like various pulses, milk etc. What In Ayurveda meat is allowed??? Really , this man must have receive huge money to say this . Ayurveda is known for herbal. Pls watch Rajiv malhotra's videos on KZread on breaking India forces. And watch DHARMA SPEAKS channel on KZread to know about our Dharma

@sonalichauhan3671

6 жыл бұрын

Sushil Choudhary it means even you haven't study, you are just quoting Mr.Malhotra and his research. It means we both are on same platter. And it's individual choice to whom he opt Mr.patnaik or Mr. Malhotra or may be your own . This kind of fighting (debating) will lead you to shallow intellect. As Hinduism is so vast and infused in our DNAs , it's impossible to draw cut straight lines.

@sushilchoudhary875

6 жыл бұрын

Sonali chauhan What I said is completely TRUE. If u want I should also lie like them then it's not possible I will not. Tell me all the name of very important sacred text of Hinduism if u know about Hinduism. And also tell me what is DHARMA? If u don't know these two very basic things , u r not eligible to debate or argue on what is Hinduism.

@SelfStudyNResearch

3 жыл бұрын

@@sushilchoudhary875 don't talk theoretical knowledge, talk real and factual. Manusmriti says it's not sin to eat meat once it is offered to god. Don't live in fantasy by making hinduism work according to your personal belief.

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

@@SelfStudyNResearch what about Shri krishna saying in gita that any food made out of violence is not good food.

Extremely shallow knowledge about Hinduism. Stating concept of vegetarian came only after Buddha and Mahavir. Pl ask him to read what did Bhism speak about killing animal for eating. Ask him to read Brihadaranyaka and fine reference, if meat eating is allowed.

@dr.abhinavsoppin

3 жыл бұрын

Read any Vedas? Go and read hymn 162 of Rigveda. There are 50 animals mentioned as fit for sacrifice😂. What he meant was that the vegetarianism became popular with Budhism and Jainism. Many famous Kings took those religions, vegetarianism also became popular. Later hindu sages also started to do the same. And being hindu if you say, meat eating is bad to other people, you are not a hindu. Because you are not following the basic principle of Hinduism that you should respect diversity in other people

@anujchaturvedi6296

3 жыл бұрын

@@dr.abhinavsoppin Just because the rig veda says about sacrifice of animal, it does not mean you are suppose to eat it. When animal was sacrificed then the Brahmins , Kshatriyas, Vaishyas would not eat the sacrificed animal. When Xuanzang (a chinese monk,scholar, and traveler) said that the people in cities abstained from eating meat and the people outside cities (lower caste) ate meat and hunted animals like the pig. Please educate yourself and stop falling in trap of the same people who colonised us and try to destroy our religion and culture.

@dr.abhinavsoppin

3 жыл бұрын

@@anujchaturvedi6296 You please read all the Vedas first. I just gave an example. There are lot many like that

@anujchaturvedi6296

3 жыл бұрын

@@dr.abhinavsoppin You need to read the Vedas in orginal syntax, not some Western Marxist Author's Translation.

@dr.abhinavsoppin

3 жыл бұрын

@@anujchaturvedi6296 Now you are teaching me which are original and not😂

I really liked the way he address the "beef" in India. (pun intended)

@prashantp495

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/hpl2ls5mpq3Wf8Y.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/c6Komc6kiLivlaQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/pJaiktGxpMjMaMo.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/gpyuubKCqrWecrw.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/gZOf0NamnZWWc5M.html

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

You should watch the videos the guy provided as a reply.

Pranam sir.. i m very curious person..nd jab se aapki videos about indian mythalogy dekhe h..me bhut influence hua hu aur me bhi aapne najriye se indian mythalogy ko smjhna chahta hu..

@VedicDharam

2 жыл бұрын

gita clearly says that meat is part of tamsik diet. tamsik is the demonic nature. it doesnt lead you closer to god. one has to change his character and diet towards a satvik movement to come more closer to god. you will not find anyone serving meat at the temple or prasad etc.... the gita clearly says this. if you eat meat as a hindu then it is your choice but do not defame hinduism. namaste

here in nepal we don't associate vegetarianism with hinduism itself but with some sects of hinduism like vaishanism, om shanti

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

Going vegan is the best option, it limits the hurt and pain we cause to animals

How could such an informative video be hidden in KZread..

@sushilchoudhary875

6 жыл бұрын

shiva shaw Becoz it is fake and completely speaking against what Hinduism teaches!!!!!!

@VedicDharam

2 жыл бұрын

gita clearly says that meat is part of tamsik diet. tamsik is the demonic nature. it doesnt lead you closer to god. one has to change his character and diet towards a satvik movement to come more closer to god. you will not find anyone serving meat at the temple or prasad etc.... the gita clearly says this. if you eat meat as a hindu then it is your choice but do not defame hinduism. namaste

Sir, the sacred texts do admit that some form of violence is necessary for survival. Hence, it is prescribed that the food (bhoga) to be offered to the dieties before consumption by humans. Furthermore, it is expalined in shastras about the three Gunas (modes) namely satva, rajas and tamas. And it is stressed that an intelligent person shall always try to achieve a higher state of consciousness by engaging more in activities involving satva guna. At the same time he shall genuinely try renouncing activities leading to lower modes. Thus, vedic philosophy prescribes the seeker of certain do's and don'ts. Now it is upto the person how much he/she is attached to a certain kind of lifestyle and how much he/she is willing to sacrifice in order to achieve a better state of consciousness. Thus the consumption of food is also an act and involves the three modes. So, the point is choose wisely!! Do take informed decisions and not just based sensual pleasures only.

@prashantp495

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/hpl2ls5mpq3Wf8Y.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/g4Fmj5KbpNe2h9I.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZKycl7Cigdy1lLQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/doCty9affK2cps4.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/gZOf0NamnZWWc5M.html

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

We cannot justify animal sacrifices... Shri krishna has asked everyone not to do such sacrifices in kali yug.

No one said vegetarianism is the food of India. What is the point in explaining when no one has said so? And there is diff between jeeva and prana. Unless we understand this we can't understand difference between Sasya (plant) and Prani (animal)

Its like a treat to ur ears and mind hearing to devdutt. He can only define Hinduism in its best ways.

@wethepeople6869

3 жыл бұрын

He is a joke who abuses his critics using violent words openly.these kind of pseudo experts have been exposed by many Indic historians and researchers.just watch Rajiv Malhotra and nityananda misra's opinions on him.this pattanaik doesn't even have the courage to accept a challenge of debate in Sanskrit and discussing original interpretations of scriptures in their native language.

@chrisgabler3419

3 жыл бұрын

Hinduism will always allow everything depending on circumstances. One can't make it generic and applicable to all. Before agriculture, all were meat eaters Doesn't mean you go and take conclusions from there. As they learned more, become advanced. They started abstaining from eating it. Ofcourse, not entire country can convert to eating veg one fine day. It's a process. If you can't afford or have the means to eat veg, it's okay, eat meat for your survival. Don't just die. That's the message. He says it was associated with upper caste Cause probably they had the resources to eat veg. Others didn't. You should eat only for your survival, If it's for your taste, then it's definitely wrong. It's against the most basic fundamental law of dharma. Where has he mentioned this? He not even mentioning about it's considered rajesic. It comes under The worst kind category of food to eat for your health. He is just giving random examples saying see people used to eat , so many people used to sacrifice So it's fine, you can eat too Without even explaining and circumstances etc No comment on the science advocated by the vedas, nothing What stupid logic. He just amazing in English. *In India, Good English means intelligent.* I see comments like he is the only person makes us understand true Hinduism. Lol

@VedicDharam

2 жыл бұрын

gita clearly says that meat is part of tamsik diet. tamsik is the demonic nature. it doesnt lead you closer to god. one has to change his character and diet towards a satvik movement to come more closer to god. you will not find anyone serving meat at the temple or prasad etc.... the gita clearly says this. if you eat meat as a hindu then it is your choice but do not defame hinduism. namaste

Great job, scroll.

Not factually incorrect but I smelled a hidden agenda. 😀

@digital945

4 жыл бұрын

Yes these people think they can fool people but its end for them

@prianshubhatia2759

3 жыл бұрын

@@digital945 how is he fooling? He is telling the truth and not giving his opinion on it.

@digital945

3 жыл бұрын

@@prianshubhatia2759 he explain hindu gods based on his own imaginations how that can be truth.lol. you know that all hindu gods are on phycological levels and they exist.

Vaishnavism doesn't allow the consumption of non-vegetarian food

@kadambahalliveerabhadraiah2801

3 жыл бұрын

That's not true .

@paraglokhande936

3 жыл бұрын

@@kadambahalliveerabhadraiah2801 i'd like to see some references.

@kadambahalliveerabhadraiah2801

3 жыл бұрын

@@paraglokhande936 see gazetters of different regions of India . Hinduism isn't monoesthic . Here they're discussing about meat . We use meat in every rituals of us

@prashantp495

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/hpl2ls5mpq3Wf8Y.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/g4Fmj5KbpNe2h9I.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZKycl7Cigdy1lLQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/doCty9affK2cps4.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/gZOf0NamnZWWc5M.html

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

Which is one of the highest forms of good karma.

According to renowned Sanatan Hindu dharm scholar Swami Vivekanand, the Vedic Brahmins used to eat Cow's meat ( beef ). A Brahmin was not considered a good Brahmin unless he consumed Cow's meat . Cow was slaughtered to obtain meat on occasions like the arrival of guests, especially the arrival of son-in-law . In many cultures Cow's meat is appreciated not only as best tasting meat , economical source of good quality animal protein by as sex power enhancer .

While the guy is helping people to explore religion, he surely is twisting the facts for mordernising the culture

@VedicDharam

2 жыл бұрын

good you saw that too. gita clearly says that meat is part of tamsik diet. tamsik is the demonic nature. it doesnt lead you closer to god. one has to change his character and diet towards a satvik movement to come more closer to god. you will not find anyone serving meat at the temple or prasad etc.... the gita clearly says this. if you eat meat as a hindu then it is your choice but do not defame hinduism. namaste

He didn't mention Tamsik foods and their negative energy. The ultimate source of energy = sun Energy converted into potential energy, by light energy is made by = plants & other autotrophs. And hence we eat plants to get energy which is comparably lower then the energy in plants and therefore when you cut a food from the plant, you can see living cells in it for many days, and even weeks or months. And when you cut an animal and see the flesh and or meat in the microscope, you will be able to see dead cells only after some minutes. This is why plants have more energy than meat.

@kingrichardiofengland9471

2 жыл бұрын

According to your logic Cows should have more energy than meat eating Lions and Tigers

@ryanroshan2732

2 жыл бұрын

@@kingrichardiofengland9471 Well sure, Elephants do. Though the original logic is flawed, however, you cannot state that non-vegatarianism is good on the basis of one flawed logic.

@kingrichardiofengland9471

2 жыл бұрын

@@ryanroshan2732 I also know that non vegetarianism is not too healthy but the logic in the comment is to narrowed vegetarianism provides equal energy as much as non vegetarian food so the logic is plants have more energy than meat is false also the logic of meat has more energy is also false they provide equal energy but it depends on the animal, elephant poses some much energy because of their size not because of food, if I go on explaining it it will go to evolution etc

@ryanroshan2732

2 жыл бұрын

@@kingrichardiofengland9471 obviously I meant to say that. The original comment is bogus.

@kingrichardiofengland9471

2 жыл бұрын

@@ryanroshan2732 self proclaimed scientists of Internet do these comments do these comments idiots

That is why hinduism is not a religion.. there are no commandments, no set rule that do this you will go to heaven or dont do that you will go to hell.. its a way of life which evolves continuously.. You have freedom to choose which god you wanna worship as your deity, there is no propaganda to convert people to hinduism.. Its not a religion, because different religions came into being over time, this has also mistakenly termed as a religion.. You might as well visit a mosque, gurudwara or a church and pray to god and still be a hindu.. People who truly spend their life as a hindu dont look down upon other religions and dont stop anyone to follow theirs.. Its sad that current scenarios and politics is moving so far away from this wonderful liberal way of life and presenting a wrong image to the society and world..

@persaud1

5 жыл бұрын

Dazzling Diva, Very well put. I have lived in other countries and worked with quite a few foreigners. I also travel across our country, in small towns etc. There is fear and insecurity built up gradually after prolonged foreign invasions, moghul rule, colonialism, poverty, coping with english education etc. The level of acceptance to all kinds of people and traditions is still great. We Indians were observers and absorbers. The only thing common is we are all eternal students, whatever beliefs we follow. We were creative and innovative and open to all ideas without criticism. We dont believe in good and bad. The idea of demons or asuras is also a recent one and influences from foreign cultures. We believe everything is progressing and in different stages and pace of improvement. We are yet to gain freedom. As R.Tagore said Where the mind is without fear. Fear of rebuke, fear of shame, fear of being mocked at. At being myself, at my own culture or traditions, dressing, way of life. Our british education system was designed to make it worse. I saw the freedom in SKorea and Japan. Though the new generation is highly influenced by westerners. There is little shame in your culture. They understand there are some wrong practices which have been corrected But there is no shame. No Fear of being What you are.

@paharipant2

5 жыл бұрын

For practical and Legal purposes, it does make sense to call Hinduism a religion. Otherwise the Hindu temples cannot be called temples for temples are a place of worship of a particular faith. If that doesn't happen then the State may take over temples calling them secular spaces or take away the privileges that a religious place enjoys.

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah ofcourse freedom to be cruel to animals. Humans are hypocrites. They want full freedom for themselves but want to keep exploiting poor animals.

0:21&0:22 cow's head at the bottom half...what is wrong with scroll?

@suvodipmondal7625

4 жыл бұрын

So?

Besides the spiritual freedom to experiment our paths to the divine, the religion itself is quite fascinating with it's huge variety of cultures mixed in it. Hinduism with it's diverse roots offers the experience of different cultures. I'm from TamilNadu where we have our own style of cooking,dressing etc.. Irrespective of religion or God, we can't separate people joined by food and lifestyle. It's more like Christians in India tend to avoid pork in their meal. Although Christians throughout the world love bacon and ham, Indian Christians(with few exceptions) hesitate to have it. Hindus in Kerala or in the west may have beef coz it has become a part of their culture. Bengalis will consider fish as the love of their life. My mother who is a Christian wears a Mangal Sutra in addition to the wedding ring. We don't wear our shoes when we enter Churches. These things happen because we get mixed with the people we live with. Hinduism in it's own way is mixed inside every person in this land. The moment you try to bring one single rule to put a label on who is a perfect or true Hindu, Hinduism itself will lose it's essence. Besides the religious discussion, present day capitalistic free market will always bring in consumerism which will eventually bring in freedom to exploit the cuisines,dressing styles,entertainment options present in other countries. The irony is that people who hail foreign investment for open market in India are the same ones who oppose foreign food habits while the people who support socialism to confine everything within the state are the same ones who are accepting multiculturalism. The reason why the so called strict or orthodox version of Hinduism is slowly fading off is not because of other religions but rather it is because of this open free consumeristic market where our minds are saturated with the worldly pleasures. We are just following what America did when it was in it's growth curve.The importance to religion will slowly disappear into thin air.

@prashantp495

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/hpl2ls5mpq3Wf8Y.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/g4Fmj5KbpNe2h9I.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZKycl7Cigdy1lLQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/doCty9affK2cps4.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/gZOf0NamnZWWc5M.html

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

And this is the perfect example of speciesism.

Manu was first person in the world, he said in manu sanhita that human should not eat meat.

@kadambahalliveerabhadraiah2801

3 жыл бұрын

Oh... Nice story

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

@@kadambahalliveerabhadraiah2801 Shri hanumat never ate meat.

It is not eating cow meat. It doesn't mean bull meat, buff meat. ❤ *I am a Shakto Hindu and I have ate Pork and Buffalo meat*

@kalharpatel4784

3 жыл бұрын

Eat your hand too

@deepakkimola4936

3 жыл бұрын

@@kalharpatel4784 lmao exactly

@luxurywellth5624

3 жыл бұрын

I am a Hindu, Caste Brahmin, Community Bengali, but I don't consider myself as Hindu Brahmin or Bengali. I am a Human being who follow vedantism being an Shakto follower

@luxurywellth5624

3 жыл бұрын

I ate everything Mutton (Lamb, Goat) Fishes (every Bengali does) Pork and also Beef (Cow, Buffalo)

@suvodipmondal7625

3 жыл бұрын

@@luxurywellth5624 good for you.

Concepts of Protein and essential amino acids have left the chat for some people in comment section. Now there are some people who still believe we can get 40gm of essential protein from a big bowl of daal and every people can afford whole grain costly plant based protein food. 🤐

Your information is very useful and i am someone who goes through these debates all the time. There is one more concept which you explained about Goddess Kali, if you cannot control vices like alcohol or smoking then the supposedly vice of eating non-veg should not be your problem. Kali would be laughing at your face when you try to show the world your pure and satvik side but inside you are just as helpless for your needs & wants.

The seven episode series is better than Devlok show, because of interesting and enchanting graphics.

non veg food is called tamshik in geeta right

Aatma is everywhere ❤️

Wow the way he explain. No tag philosophy.

The case of cows in ancient India, it isn't entirely true that the cows were sacred or divinely attested in the society, atleast not till the later Vedic period.. because prior to that in early Vedic era, a person's social status was determined by how many cows he owned.. and rig Vedic texts talk about the pride in waging war and the capture of cattles of the rival tribes.. so cows were valued possesion.. slaughtering them would reduce the numbers and that reflects on ur status.. but that doesn't mean they never ate cows. It was rather a delicacy served only for specific occasions. Especially if the chieftain is marrying of his daughter, then he slaughters the best cow he has for the occasion. There's even a term in ancient text denoting to it Gognha (गोगना), even Panini makes note of this.. and even later texts after later Vedic era mention this practice of consuming the cow (albeit not a common practice but only reserved for occasion) “The cow should be slaughtered on the arrival of a guest, on the occasion of shraddha of ancestors and on the occasion of a marriage.” ~Apastamb Grihsutram (1/3/10) For a detailed analysis and informative read, please do check out this book "The Myth of the Holy Cow" by D. Narayan Jha

are u a odia ?

That's why Sadhguru has a better approach to this topic than this person who I don't know why is trying to generalize Hinduism in today's context so that people feel better and live according to their convenience. The way of life can never be convenient method that suits you that is what dharma is.

@Senthilganapathy

3 жыл бұрын

Krishna says follow your dharma . A butcher's dharma is to slaughter. By the way, sadhguru never read vedas. His knowledge only comes from his own spiritual experience. So he can't speak the truth.

@yashagrawal88

2 жыл бұрын

Dharma is ethics, what 'you should do'. This video is about Hindu religion, 'what is done'. You have confused the descriptive and prescriptive topics.

@anirbanroy8601

11 ай бұрын

Does any major Sanatan scripture say about sanatanis do not consume non veg(ie meat fish and egg) ? As per my understanding of scriptures till now Hindu Sanatanis can be Non-veg. If you know otherwise, Please quote from scriptures with chapter and shloka number.

@ShubhamKumar-ib5fy

11 ай бұрын

​@@anirbanroy8601 If you say so I would say there is nothing that any Sanatan scriptures say about in absolute, all it does is, it shows you the action and consequences that's why food has been divided into 3 gunas. Satvik, Rajasik and Tamasik. Now it's up to you what you choose but there will be consequences no matter what you choose. And I'm not here to teach anyone anything to quote. All I know is there is a choice and any day I wouldn't kill a sentient being.

sir I request you to through some light on blood sacrifice in Hinduism... its really seems insane & barbaric...what's its purpose?... can just briefly explain

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

It's not useful anymore... And it's been banned in India already. Also krishna said in gita that animal sacrifices shouldn't be done in kalyug.

@rebeccaanderson5626

2 жыл бұрын

@@SS-bw6cn nope we still Sacrifice Goats to Maa Kali here in West Bengal

@SS-bw6cn

2 жыл бұрын

@@rebeccaanderson5626 do you know Coastal areas like west bengal will emerge under water in another ten years? Better be kind before your mahapralaya comes....

@rebeccaanderson5626

2 жыл бұрын

@@SS-bw6cn so you mean to say that if we stop all animal sacrifice there would be no flooding of Bengal ? lmao

Dietary habits of any community depend upon the easy and round the year availability of food sources, e.g. desert people of Arabian countries and hilly area people are bound to eat non-vegetarian and milk based diet due to non-availability of vegetables round the year .

Sir, Hinduism is a culture which deals beyond basic materialistic reasons. In Hinduism eating isn't just for satisfying hunger or taste, it's for your overall mental development and emotional balance. And as the caste system is nothing but the profession you do, accordingly ancestors described what kind of food, veg or non veg, to be eaten for each sect or caste. What we eaten affects satva, Rajas, Tammo qualities in us, which in turn affect the overall behavior and perspective.

@prashantp495

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/hpl2ls5mpq3Wf8Y.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/g4Fmj5KbpNe2h9I.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZKycl7Cigdy1lLQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/doCty9affK2cps4.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/gZOf0NamnZWWc5M.html

70% veg existing 100 years ago now only 30 % due to u like people.u can eat and go against nature but please don't take name Hindu allowed .Hinduism is law of nature and have same respect to all creature. If earthworm and other animals survive nature survive but if if human no is increased it will terrible .animal are most Patriot to nature than human so u must sacrifice yourself than to sacrifice animal for u.

@sushilchoudhary875

6 жыл бұрын

Rahul Sah what hv u been doing to stop this. Watch Rajiv malhotra's videos on KZread and share them . Contribute to Dharma.

@sushilchoudhary875

6 жыл бұрын

Aj Hegi Rahul shah

@sagarbaidya583

6 жыл бұрын

And where did you find that statistics ? please enlighten me.

@SarthakSabharwalMusic

6 жыл бұрын

Go against nature? Really? Please look around. Is nature vegetarian? Also, the only reason humans can digest both plants and animals is only because they have been made by nature to consume both plants and animals. Humans have been created to be omnivorous in nature. Try feeding a herbivorous animal meat. It wouldn't be able to digest it. Doesn't work the same way with humans.

@sushilchoudhary875

6 жыл бұрын

Sarthak Sabharwal Can anyone recommend to eat u meat ,when u are ill ? Nope. Lion eat only meat , when he is healthy or not. It means meat is not good for health,but u r eating it for personal satisfaction.

Well, some Hindus would disagree with what Dev Sir has said. But the context matters in this scenario. Why do you need meat?? That's the question!! If it's for self-absorption like murdering creatures for your unnecessary desires other than desperate need, that's when it becomes violent. A person who eats meat just for the taste and flavor all the time when he could eat vegetables is doing something unnecessary. One honest reason behind meat - eating is taste. But remember, taste is felt only by your tongue and is receptive only to your brain, not by your stomach or the other parts of your body. Your stomach might not get benefitted from eating that meat and even if it does, it can get those same nutrients from some other vegetables too. If it is really for a dire necessity of nutrients or a scenario of unavailability of other food, then it is not violence, that's self-sustenance. Unlike other religions, Hinduism values subjectivity and context in place of objectivity and numeracy. As he said, there are no fixed commandments that needs to be followed to become a Hindu. Reasons and emotions matter and balance is attained on that basis. Nature defines Hinduism in many ways, just like nature is extremely complex and cannot be understood by a specific set of laws, so is Hinduism. Hindu philosophy works in similar fashion to the working of nature. Nothing is evil or good and ordered or disordered in itself, everything is based upon the context and viewpoint. The idea of eating meat is everywhere but the idea of not eating meat comes from the hermit way of life where you detach yourself from worldly things to rediscover yourself without any sort of involvement in the world. Now, this idea was born out to provide balance to the society because if everyone starts eating meat then the population of those animals would go extinct and violence would outgrow itself. Greed will spread everywhere, with no satiety in people's mind and eventually just like meat is the reason for an animal's existence, body shapes would be looked upon as a woman's value. Something which is in full swing these days which has resulted in so many homicides all over our country. Women are looked upon just for the shape of their body parts for the sake of sexual gratification which also arises from a similar psychological behaviour of eating meat all the time just for the sake of taste. The objectification of women works in parallel with avoidable meat eating. The hermit way of life of not eating any meat and withdrawing from life was born keeping in mind of this eventual crisis which will distort the balance in the society. Everyone will become savage creatures and will be responsible for the demise of the society, and this has happened before. Our ancient sages were aware of this problem and therefore they added the hermit way of life closer to every householder text in those scriptures to provide balance. Now at first glance this distorts clarity, as it does not tell us what to do directly. When someone reads these texts, they're confused as to what must be followed, the hermit or the householder?? But if you read them carefully, they're written in a very reader-interpretation style depending on what the reader wants to read and take from it. So, for clarity, Well, I would say, a person who's been a violent householder for a long time should resort to the hermit way and a person who remained a hermit who withdrew from life for too long and is forgotten by time (just like Arjun in Mahabharata) should seek the householder way. Because it's obvious that no one can sustain himself /herself with either of the extremes believing that some external force would help them out. So, if we view Hinduism from a philosophical binocular, life is basically the movement from either extreme to the other and the return to it and then the return to the other like a clock depending on the context, need, nature and time without any permanence. Everything changes, what is there will wither and what has withered away will come back in different ways.

@anirbanroy8601

11 ай бұрын

Does any major Sanatan scripture say about sanatanis do not consume non veg(ie meat fish and egg) ? As per my understanding of scriptures till now Hindu Sanatanis can be Non-veg. If you know otherwise, Please quote from scriptures with chapter and shloka number.

Anyone watching this, please note this gentleman is not qualified to represent Hinduism, this is his opinion & he is entitled to it, but this video doesn’t represent what Hinduism is about

100% ! THANK YOU FOR BEING BRAVE ENOUGH TO REVEAL THESE THRUTHS ABOUT HINDU DIETARY CUSTOMS AND BELIEFS.

@VedicDharam

2 жыл бұрын

gita clearly says that meat is part of tamsik diet. tamsik is the demonic nature. it doesnt lead you closer to god. one has to change his character and diet towards a satvik movement to come more closer to god. you will not find anyone serving meat at the temple or prasad etc.... the gita clearly says this. if you eat meat as a hindu then it is your choice but do not defame hinduism. namaste

@beingfrank40

2 жыл бұрын

@@VedicDharam Nobody is defaming Hinduism, I think it is glorious. The great saint Sri Ramakrishna stayed at the Kali Temple where on every new moon there was a goat offered to her. Also, in many temple to the goddeses. Also in Ramayana. Ram kills a deer. In old Vedas it says meat eating is fine. Shiva is of the nature of Tamas, right? In old India always people ate meat, the Buddha was against it.

But why fox,s are not recognized as dacre in Hinduism

World history teaches us that initially early man was vegetarian. He was forced to turn to meat as a food source for his survival due to massive floods , drought famine and other natural disasters.

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

But now majority of humans have the opportunity to survive on a plant based diet. It's easy, go vegan!

No eating beef makes you superior.

I hated the concept that he mentioned Hinduism and not Sanatan Dharm, and that is polytheistic in nature. This is demented and sick, we are not polytheists we believe in one God Ishwar, referred as Om the Adi. Who is and always will be the Creator, the Preserver and the Destroyer. Consuming meat is a personal choice, if it guilts you then you should abstain from it. Brahmins usually are vegetarians but most Kshatriyas everywhere consume meat but not cow meat. And we dont worship any random animal. It is said in Bhagvad Gita that "only the coward and sinned chooses to appeases God, and in a misguided manner pretends to make a god out of everything, when Iam One and is within everyone"

@leviackerman-nq9vk

6 жыл бұрын

Ankur Brahma cow meat is also consumed by Kshatriya Nair

@kshatriyapa

5 жыл бұрын

Okay... that's what all polytheistic religionists believe in... all of us. Nothing to hate against the word polytheism. Every polytheistic religion has One Supreme Being among all.

People posting offensive comments here against Devdutt, have zero knowledge of what they are defending. Especially, there are people copying and pasting some verses from rigveda mentioning that those verses denounce eating meat, have picked up those popular verses from the internet in a desperate attempt to defend the beliefs they've grown with but are completely unaware of the facts and have a narrow vision of the world. If you are so pissed of by the statements Devdutt is making, why don't you post a video with your versions criticizing him with facts and your knowledge?

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

You're a perfect example of a speciesist.

Other religions will be unconscious after watching this.

Informations may be correct but Don't opine and give your own whimsical Views as you like... On Vedic scriptures.

You are wrong here, nobody ate meat because it is mentioned in the Vedas, everybody followed the Vedas and were a Vedic Society.

Temple didnt exist from 2000-3000 years ago? In fact, the oldest temple everbuilt and found is 12000 years ago.. Well such videos cant be relied upon😅

@atul1774

4 жыл бұрын

Which famous temple? Only shiva linga worshipped and before 2000-3000 years ago. In dhyan yoga, seeing flowing water and something black gives purity in mind.

@kadambahalliveerabhadraiah2801

3 жыл бұрын

Don't lie

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

Are you talking about shaktipeeths?

We don't eat animals for their love yes religion is a reason but my reason is for no harm to animals

So is cow slaughter permissible in hinduism?

@suvodipmondal7625

4 жыл бұрын

No, never he didn't say that. Cow killing, eating of cow meat is not allowed. But doesn't include meat of bull, ox, buffalo.

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

Every animal killing is banished in Hinduism in kaliyug as per Shri krishna.

Quite good video. Except that I won't call 2000 year old religion as Hinduism. It was Brahmanism. Vedism - Brahmanism - Hinduism is the chronology. This video is about how Hinduism's food beliefs are, not how they should be. Of course for the environment and to reduce suffering, we should eat vegetarian as much as possible. But that is not related to religious beliefs.

Last sentence is less of mythology and more of political

East indian Bhramins consume Non veg , also some Bhramins of south but most of them don't and are orthodox. And All of the North Indian Bhramins don't eat non veg.

@atul1774

4 жыл бұрын

North Indian especially, himalayan (पहाड़ी) brahmn eats non-veg food too.

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

@@atul1774 let's contribute to a kinder world for animals

But non veg is strongly disagreed in Gita (iskcon English print)

@anirbanroy8601

11 ай бұрын

Isckon is not final authority in Sanatan; neither there are any fixed path. Does any major Sanatan scripture say about sanatanis do not consume non veg(ie meat fish and egg) ? As per my understanding of scriptures till now Hindu Sanatanis can be Non-veg. If you know otherwise, Please quote from scriptures with chapter and shloka number.

Nothing can define killing if animals

Love these series♥️

@VedicDharam

2 жыл бұрын

gita clearly says that meat is part of tamsik diet. tamsik is the demonic nature. it doesnt lead you closer to god. one has to change his character and diet towards a satvik movement to come more closer to god. you will not find anyone serving meat at the temple or prasad etc.... the gita clearly says this. if you eat meat as a hindu then it is your choice but do not defame hinduism. namaste

So umm.. didn't Bhagvad Gita say that eating an animal isn't good? Because the state of their soul is transferred into the consumer.

@sg042

6 жыл бұрын

Quotes that disapprove, even denounce, meat-eating: Rig Veda: "One who partakes of human flesh, the flesh of a horse or of another animal, and deprives others of milk by slaughtering cows, O King, if such a fiend does not desist by other means, then you should not hesitate to cut off his head." Rig-veda (10.87.16) Manu-Samhita: "Meat can never be obtained without injury to living creatures, and injury to sentient beings is detrimental to the attainment of heavenly bliss; let him therefore shun the use of meat. Having well considered the disgusting origin of flesh and the cruelty of fettering and slaying corporeal beings, let him entirely abstain from eating flesh." (Manu-samhita 5.48-49) "He who permits the slaughter of an animal, he who cuts it up, he who kills it, he who buys or sells meat, he who cooks it, he who serves it up, and he who eats it, must all be considered as the slayers of the animal. There is no greater sinner than that man who though not worshiping the gods or the ancestors, seeks to increase the bulk of his own flesh by the flesh of other beings." (Manu-samhita 5.51-52) "If he has a strong desire (for meat) he may make an animal of clarified butter or one of flour (and eat that); but let him never seek to destroy an animal without a (lawful) reason. As many hairs as the slain beast has, so often indeed will he who killed it without a (lawful) reason suffer a violent death in future births." (Manu-samhita 5.37-38) "He who injures harmless creatures from a wish to give himself pleasure, never finds happiness in this life or the next." (Manu-samhita 5.45) "By subsisting on pure fruits and roots, and by eating food fit for ascetics in the forest, one does not gain so great a reward as by entirely avoiding the use of flesh. Me he [mam sah] will devour in the next world, whose flesh I eat in this life; the wise declare this to be the real meaning of the word 'flesh' [mam sah]." (Manu-samhita 5.54-55) "He who does not seek to cause the sufferings of bonds and death to living creatures, (but) desires the good of all (beings), obtains endless bliss. He who does not injure any (creature) attains without an effort what he thinks of, what he undertakes, and what he fixes his mind on." (Manu-samhita 5.46-47) "By not killing any living being, one becomes fit for salvation." (Manu-samhita 6.60) Mahabharata: "He who desires to augment his own flesh by eating the flesh of other creatures, lives in misery in whatever species he may take his [next] birth." (Mahabharata, Anu.115.47) "The purchaser of flesh performs violence by his wealth; he who eats flesh does so by enjoying its taste; the killer does violence by actually tying and killing the animal. Thus, there are three forms of killing. He who brings flesh or sends for it, he who cuts off the limbs of an animal, and he who purchases, sells, or cooks flesh and eats it--all these are to be considered meat-eaters." (Mahabharata, Anu.115.40) "The sins generated by violence curtail the life of the perpetrator. Therefore, even those who are anxious for their own welfare should abstain from meat-eating." (Mahabharata, Anu.115.33) Bhishma started, "Numberless discourses took place between the Rishis on this subject, O scion of Kuru's race. Listen, O Yudhisthira, what their opinion was. (Mahabharata, Anu.115.7) "The highly wise seven celestial Rishis, the Valakshillyas, and those Rishis who drink the rays of the sun, all speak highly of abstention from meat. "The self-created Manu has said that the man who does not eat meat, or who does not kill living creatures, or who does not cause them to be killed, is a friend of all creatures. Such a man is incapable of being oppressed by any creature. He enjoys the confidence of all living beings. He always enjoys the praise of the pious. The virtuous Narada has said that that man who wishes to multiply his own flesh by eating the flesh of other creatures meets with disaster". (Mahabharata, Anu.115.9-12) "That man, who having eaten meat, gives it up afterwards wins merit by such a deed that is so great that a study of all the Vedas or a performance, O Bharata, of all the sacrifices [Vedic rituals], cannot give its like". (Mahabharata, Anu.115.16) "That learned person who gives to all living creatures the gift of complete assurance is forsooth regarded as the giver of lifebreaths in this world". (Mahabharata, Anu.115.18) "Men gifted with intelligence and purified souls should always treat others as they themselves wish to be treated. It is seen that even those men who are endued with learning and who seek to acquire the greatest good in the shape of liberation, are not free of the fear of death". (Mahabharata, Anu.115.20) "What necessity be said of those innocent and healthy creatures gifted with love of life, when they are sought to be killed by sinful wretches living by slaughter? Therefore, O King, know that the discarding of meat is the highest refuge of religion, of the celestial region, and of happiness. Abstention of injury [to others] is the highest religion. It is, again, the highest penance. It is also the highest truth from which all duty emanates. (Mahabharata, Anu.115.21-23) "Flesh cannot be had from grass or wood or stone. Unless a living creature is killed it cannot be procured. Hence is the fault of eating flesh. The celestials who live upon Svaha, Svadha, and nectar, are given to truth and sincerity. Those persons, however, who are for satisfying the sensation of taste, should be known as Rakshasas [flesh-eating demons] pervaded by the quality of Darkness. (Mahabharata, Anu.115.24-25) "If there were nobody who ate flesh, then there would be nobody to slay living creatures. The man who slays living creatures kills them for the sake of the person who eats flesh. If flesh were not considered as food, there would then be no destruction of living creatures. It is for the sake of the eater that the destruction of living entities is carried on in the world. Since, O you of great splendor, the period of life is shortened by persons who kill living creatures or cause them to be killed, it is clear that the person who seeks his own good should give up meat altogether. Those dreadful persons who are engaged in the destruction of living beings never find protectors when they are in need. Such persons should always be molested and punished even as beast of prey. (Mahabharata, Anu.115.29-32) "That man who seeks to multiply his own flesh by (eating) the flesh of others has to live in this world in great anxiety, and after death has to take birth in indifferent races and families. High Rishis given to the observance of vows and self-control have said that abstention from meat is worthy of praise, productive of fame and Heaven, and a great satisfaction itself. This I heard formerly, O son of Kunti, from Markandeya when that Rishi discoursed on the sins of eating flesh. (Mahabharata, Anu.115.34-36) "He who purchases flesh, kills living creatures through his money. He who eats flesh, kills living beings through his eating. He who binds or seizes and actually kills living creatures is the slaughterer. These are the three sorts of slaughter through each of these acts. He who does not himself eat flesh but approves of an act of slaughter, becomes stained with the sin of slaughter. (Mahabharata, Anu.115.38-39) "That wretched man who kills living creatures for the sake of those who would eat them commits great sin. The eater's sin is not as great. That wretched man who, following the path of religious rites and sacrifices as laid down in the Vedas, would kill a living creature from a desire to eats its flesh, will certainly go to hell. That man who having eaten flesh abstains from it afterwards acquires great merit on account of such abstention from sin. He who arranges for obtaining flesh, he who approves of those arrangements, he who kills, he who buys or sells, he who cooks, and he who eats it, [acquire the sin of those who] are all considered as eaters of flesh. [Therefore] that man who wishes to avoid disaster should abstain from the meat of every living creature. (Mahabharata, Anu.115.44-48) "Listen to me, O king of kings, as I tell you this, O sinless one, there is absolute happiness in abstaining from meat, O king. He who practices severe austerities for a century, and he who abstains from meat, are both equally meritorious. This is my opinion. (Mahabharata, Anu.115.52-53) "Yudhisthira said: Alas, those cruel men who, not caring for various other sorts of food, want only flesh, are really like great Rakshasas [meat-eating demons]. (Mahabharata, Anu.116.1) "Bhishma said: That man who wishes to increase his own flesh by the meat of another living creature is such that there is none meaner and more cruel than he. In this world there is nothing that is dearer to a creature than his life. Hence, one should show mercy to the lives of others as he does to his own life. Forsooth, O son, flesh has its origin in the vital seed. There is great sin attached to its eating, as, indeed, there is merit in abstaining from it. (Mahabharata, Anu.116.11-13) "There is nothing, O delighter of the Kurus, that is equal in point of merit, either in this world or in the next, to the practice of mercy to all living creatures. (Mahabharata, Anu.116.19) "Hence a person of purified soul should be merciful to all living creatures. That man, O king, who abstains from every kind of meat from his birth forsooth, acquires a large space in the celestial region. They who eat the flesh of animals who are desirous of life, are themselves [later] eaten by the animals they eat. This is my opinion. Since he has eaten me, I shall eat him in return. This, O Bharata, forms the character as Mamsah [meaning flesh] of Mamsah [me he, or "me he" will eat for having eaten him]. The destroyer is always slain. After him the eater meets with the same fate. (Mahabharata, Anu.116.32-35)

@sharadhamanjunath6106

6 жыл бұрын

sneh gupta I am vegetarian...but my family members are not...I chose it...you have quoted so many things from so many literary works...but my great grandparents never had that luxury to depend on grains and veg for food...they went to hunt fish at night time with a kerosene lamp which would attract a school of fish towards them and they would directly throw a large knife or a thing of that sort to kill them and this would give them a days meal....FREE MEAL actually...and now all they need is little bit of salt n pepper...no we were never fishermen...our ancestors had a decent job of weaving ( cloth making) and were musicians who would perform in weddings n funerals...but past 400- 500yrs have been difficult...so called elite families always have shamed us for we do... eventually my great grandfather decided this should not happen to his children so he forced my grandpa to be educated for which iam grateful that now we are in good position...BUT at the cost of my roots, my heritage I now don't know how to hold a shehnayi nor a flute nor adrum...had it been that elite families had little bit of respect towards other ppl for what they do...and all those things u quoted were never known to us...u never shared them with others...and ofcourse v would have tried to learn but when u work so hard to gain a days bread u definitely don't have luxury to sit and study these things!!

@sg042

6 жыл бұрын

sharadha manjunath I completely empathised with you and I am so sorry what happened to you. I respect your families food choice , because I kind of agree that vegetarian is not possible everywhere. But whatever happened has happened , now that you are not ignorant, we know how animals are raped/tortured/killed before coming to plate. So, why not bring the change and make world a better place.

@soumyasundarhazra6406

6 жыл бұрын

Texts from the holy books are subject to different interpretations. There are multiple translation from each verse . Sometimes in hundreds. Please stop using translations as truths. This translation is ur truth. My translation can be different nd be my truth. As long as we r on the right path. Which is subjective but very relevant in Hinduism. Right or wrong. And all its variations

@bidishadey3815

6 жыл бұрын

Where the hell did you hear that!! Read the geeta sometimes....

This is an oversimplified explanation of vegetarianism vs. nonvegetarianism with the aim to propagate liberalization of people who at present are against the consumption of cow meat in India. I am a Hindu who eats cow meat absolutely by choice. I am also a political liberal which should explain my inherent views against the orthodox idea of food habits and the imposal of laws on them and certain religious groups. However, knowing my religion, while there is no mention against the slaughter of cows for consumption there is still a very valid explanation why Hindus or Sanatans do not consume this meat. Cows are revered as 'gai-mata' for the sole reason that she gives milk which is not just available in abundance but also is the only nourishment after a mother's milk for the new borns, which means, if a child is motherless or cannot be fed her own or another mother's milk, cow's milk will do the job just right and save their life. It must be understood that this philosophy and reason is very powerful. There is a huge stigma around cow meat on both ends of the cow meat consumers and non-consumers. While I understand what drives the conservative Hindus to protect the holy cow, it by no means can justify the violence and intolerance this entire debate has brought forth. Conservatives must understand that personal choices and other religious food habits aren't under their control. Just like a vegetarian cannot be coerced into eating meat an individual who likes to consume any sort of beef should not be forced to give up that part of their life. And consumers of beef too must learn and acknowledge the principal behind the non-consumption of cows instead of treating it as trivial, old-school and ridiculous which can be offensive to many Hindus. The reasons and the policies today must both be revisited and understood by both groups and thought of rationally. As for vegetarianism, it must be kept in mind that this is a preferred diet for Hindus because of its simplistic non-material lifestyle and health reasons over the cruelty of sacrificing animals. If cruelty was the case, 'Bali-dan' wouldn't have been practiced in this part of the world which again really contradicts why not cows then too, but, the status of cows as mothers overpowers any other explanation! What is important for Indian citizens today is that they revisit their religions not for religious reasons but pure knowledge and understanding of themselves. That is lacking and hence, there is a sense of identity insecurity if not a crisis entirely.

@prashantp495

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/hpl2ls5mpq3Wf8Y.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/g4Fmj5KbpNe2h9I.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZKycl7Cigdy1lLQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/doCty9affK2cps4.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/gZOf0NamnZWWc5M.html

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

You can watch dominion if you can. It's easily available on youtube. I bet you won't watch it. Also which text straight from the goddess says that its okay to sacrifice innocent animals for her?

in vedas cow was sacrificed and consumed.

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

Shri krishna as quoted in the gita has said that animal sacrifices shouldn't be done in kaliyug. Also he said refrain from causing harm to the animals or eating meat.

@rkannan0emc

3 жыл бұрын

@@SS-bw6cn in Mahabaratha before kurushethra both the sides they performed human sacrifices.

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

@@rkannan0emc yes but he said in kaliyug, it shouldn't be done.

He is also generalizing bengali culture to India. South Indians or most north Indians except in some parts of himalayas people do not do bali thing

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

South Indians and a bit weirder section of North Indians do it but yes it is illegal now and has been banned since long but people still break rules. Also as quoted by Shri krishna, animal sacrifices shouldn't be done during kal yuga.

@pkv8807

2 жыл бұрын

@@SS-bw6cn all south Indians are same ?

@abeidiot

9 ай бұрын

No. You are generalizing your culture to India. If bengali culture did something, then by transitive property, it is a part of Indian culture

@richu-21

9 ай бұрын

​@@abeidiot I think you need some math classes. Bengal is a subset of India. So transitive property does not hold true in case of superset and subset relationship.

I think these days vegetarianism is more about feeling compassionate rather then to eat what our body needs to remain healthy.

@prashantp495

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/hpl2ls5mpq3Wf8Y.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/c6Komc6kiLivlaQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/pJaiktGxpMjMaMo.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/gpyuubKCqrWecrw.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/gZOf0NamnZWWc5M.html

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

It's compassionate and necessary too... My grandmother has been a vegetarian all her life and she's going strong.

Shriman Devadatt ji you must read the bhaksh-abhakshya-vishay chapter from "Light of Truth" (satyarth prakash) by swami dayanand saraswati 🙏

@leviackerman-nq9vk

6 жыл бұрын

Deepak Arya swami Dayanand saraswathi is the reason we are following vegetarianism and cow protection it was his reforms which added all these into hinduism

@kshatriyapa

5 жыл бұрын

@@leviackerman-nq9vk No he didn't add anything. He just revived an ancient path.

@suvodipmondal7625

4 жыл бұрын

Doyanondo sarted the lynching for cow too What rubish. And he wasn't Fully aware of Hinduism because he lived in era when Harappa wasn't found.

@VedicDharam

2 жыл бұрын

just read gita. gita clearly says that meat is part of tamsik diet. tamsik is the demonic nature. it doesnt lead you closer to god. one has to change his character and diet towards a satvik movement to come more closer to god. you will not find anyone serving meat at the temple or prasad etc.... the gita clearly says this. if you eat meat as a hindu then it is your choice but do not defame hinduism. namaste

@anirbanroy8601

11 ай бұрын

Devdutt ji well explained about food practices in Hindu Sanatan dharm. Does any major Sanatan scripture say about sanatanis do not consume non veg(ie meat fish and egg) ? As per my understanding of scriptures till now Hindu Sanatanis can be Non-veg. If you know otherwise, Please quote from scriptures with chapter and shloka number.

Nepal's hindu eat buff meat but in Hinduism if you could then you shouldn't eat any meat.

'Atma is everywhere'? If you are going to make such a beautiful video on Hinduism, why wouldn't you do basic research about the fundamental concepts of Hinduism? Every being is a jivatma with all the qualities of the paramatma expressing in various ways, making no one superior or inferior but on their own journey living out their karma.

@atul1774

4 жыл бұрын

"Aatma is everywhere" And "Aatma is immortal, it cant be destroyed " Then you can say, killing body actually never hurt aatma.

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

@@atul1774 are you justifying killing animals?

@yashagrawal88

2 жыл бұрын

@@SS-bw6cn This argument is used by Krishna in Bhagwat Gita to convince Arjuna to fight the war. (Of course animals should not be killed unnecessarily, and I am a vegetarian. But just saying what is in the scriptures.)

@SS-bw6cn

2 жыл бұрын

@@yashagrawal88 no problem, yes we are all mortals, death will come to each one of us. But I believe killing animals is a sin if we have other food options available.

This man is a confused secular. There is emphasis towards vegetarianism and especially towards abstinance of eating beef across all Hindu castes. He's describing the religion in a way the overwhelming majority do not agree, plus its eerily similar to that preached by notable Lutyens (Shashi and Ram Guha)

@abeidiot

9 ай бұрын

You literally lied with ' There is emphasis towards vegetarianism and especially towards abstinance of eating beef across all Hindu castes'. Go back to cow belt

I don't think violence and non violence should be taken into consideration because food is taken based upon the castes in the sense the work the individual involve in, for example khatriya will take non veg because it not only helps him physically but also it produces rajo gunna in the individual and brahmin takes only food that supports satva gunna. because both the plants and animals will be having life.

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

Plants don't feel pain, animals do. Also there's nothing like the caste system anymore so we shouldn't support any kind of animal cruelty and abuse.

Vedas say cow should not be killed , Vedas compare rain clouds with divine cow.

@prashantp495

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/hpl2ls5mpq3Wf8Y.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/g4Fmj5KbpNe2h9I.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZKycl7Cigdy1lLQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/doCty9affK2cps4.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/gZOf0NamnZWWc5M.html

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

It's not only the cows, Shri krishna says not to harm any animal, specially in kaliyug.

@prashantp495

3 жыл бұрын

@@SS-bw6cn True: kzread.info/dash/bejne/hpl2ls5mpq3Wf8Y.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/c6Komc6kiLivlaQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/pJaiktGxpMjMaMo.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/gpyuubKCqrWecrw.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/gZOf0NamnZWWc5M.html

All s one & one s all Full metal alchemist

make this video in Hindi

At the end of the day eating meat which brought about an Animal's death for your pleasure is not going to earn you +ve points. If you have an option to not cause an animal's death then you should always take that route. Hinduism gives you freedom to choose your path because in times of famine or still harsher times you may have to kill an animal to survive. That does not mean you should kill for fun and pleasure of your taste buds all the time. The best course is to avoid actions that bring about death for your sensual satisfaction.

@prashantp495

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/hpl2ls5mpq3Wf8Y.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/g4Fmj5KbpNe2h9I.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZKycl7Cigdy1lLQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/doCty9affK2cps4.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/gZOf0NamnZWWc5M.html

Not just animals even plants are living beings. It's just they can't shout or talk.

@prashantp495

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/l4J7sduNZtTFe8Y.html

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

A fruit falls off from a branch so that you can eat them... Even krishna himself had said that its okay to eat fruits and veggies.

@ryanroshan2732

2 жыл бұрын

Plants lack neuroreceptors, they cannot feel pain.

you never come to conclusions

If life is a violent they why ban human meat...let them enjoy..

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

Agreed, humans are biggest hypocrites...

Um monastic orders did not begin with Buddhism. The sapta Rishis and shiva start that. Jainism is older than Buddhism. And shivite mysticism is the oldest monastic order in Indian history. There was a renaissance of Hindu yogic traditions post Buddhism after Adi Shankara. This guy is making up his own stories and calling it history.

All avtars in indian society are kings or high caste persons why??

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

Yes even i wanted to ask this.

@ryanroshan2732

2 жыл бұрын

Krishna, Krishna was a Shudra at a point in his life. Vaishya throughout his childhood. Varaha, an animal as an avatar. How is Krishna limited to a Varna?

@ryanroshan2732

2 жыл бұрын

Shiva once emerged as a fisherman in one of his avatars. They are the so called lower castes.

@ryanroshan2732

2 жыл бұрын

However by calling this caste, it loses its essence, it was never meant to be this way. ब्राह्मणक्षत्रियविशां शूद्राणां च परन्तप | कर्माणि प्रविभक्तानि स्वभावप्रभवैर्गुणै: || 41|| The duties of the Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, and Shudras-are distributed according to their qualities, in accordance with their guṇas (and not by birth). शमो दमस्तप: शौचं क्षान्तिरार्जवमेव च | ज्ञानं विज्ञानमास्तिक्यं ब्रह्मकर्म स्वभावजम् || 42 Tranquility, restraint, austerity, purity, patience, integrity, knowledge, wisdom, and belief in a hereafter-these are the intrinsic qualities of work for Brahmins. शौर्यं तेजो धृतिर्दाक्ष्यं युद्धे चाप्यपलायनम् | दानमीश्वरभावश्च क्षात्रं कर्म स्वभावजम् || 43|| BG 18.43: Valor, strength, fortitude, skill in weaponry, resolve never to retreat from battle, large-heartedness in charity, and leadership abilities, these are the natural qualities of work for Kshatriyas. कृषिगौरक्ष्यवाणिज्यं वैश्यकर्म स्वभावजम् | परिचर्यात्मकं कर्म शूद्रस्यापि स्वभावजम् || 44|| Agriculture, dairy farming, and commerce are the natural works for those with the qualities of Vaishyas. Serving through work is the natural duty for those with the qualities of Shudras. When Krishna served Arjuna as the charioteer, he was a Shudra. When he took his cattle to the pastures, he was a Vaishya. So Varna changes on the particular karma you do.

Pork is also consumed by tantric shaivites and saktas of NE india lke sonowal, bodo,karbi,deori communities of assamese society.

@anandrmnn

6 жыл бұрын

ContriveBrain: Hindus don't don't need to follow any scripture or manual like the desert cult. If you love to follow historic scripture and rules so much consider becoming a desert cult follower (Muslim or Christian) and you would be happier.

@anandrmnn

6 жыл бұрын

No animal life can exist without killing another being... so no killing is a romantic idea but impossible to follow. Mindless killing and wasting food is bad - most animal don't kill for pleasure or waste food that credit only goes to the humans - that too not all humans - it's those who are influenced by the desert cult that makes them believe humans are superior and everything else exist solely to be exploited by the humans. Unfortunately the negative intolerant influence of the desert cult has corrupted many Hindus as well due to 800 years for brutal Islamic rule and 200 years of European exploitation, that's why many Hindus (especially the ones from the Cow belt of North India where the brutality of the Islamic invaders was highest) think their way is the only way and everything else is Non-hindu. Most 'vegetarian' Hindus consume massive amount of milk and milk based products without worrying or being concerned about the incredible amount cruelty and violence associated with it... it's this insensitivity and the mindless cruelty that the ideal Hindus should be concerned about - not someones else's food habit that developed due to geographical location, condition and availability.

@sanjanasoni2262

6 жыл бұрын

Those are requirements to live in that terrain

@User360iskon

6 жыл бұрын

Monut Yadav who da fuck will kill us? We have killed many up-biharis in assam. NE is an integral part of india and know history and geography 1st b4 barking

@User360iskon

6 жыл бұрын

Monut Yadav BHOKTA REH..NE WAS NEVER UNDER ADMINISTRATIVE RULE of any indian kingdoms and read history 1st b4 barking LOOSER.

As I always question my students about these three questions as well, I'd put them out here too: 1. IF the vegetarian folks think we were always so then could you kindly explain the canine teeth in your jaw? 2. IF you are debunking that, then do you think agriculture happened before the earliest historical "man" discovered it? When did hunting and gathering take place and why was there even a need for that since food source was already available? AND 3. Do cows produce milk for human beings or their calves? It is easy to snatch a poor calf's main food source, in many cases, right after birth, and that's fair? Simply answer those logically and ET VOILA! you have the simple answer keeping all 'religions' to the side. Cheers!

@BakaNeBaka

6 жыл бұрын

We all share a common root in naturism and nature worship. Religions are all 2-3 or let's even say 5,000 years old but mankind came to the fore way before that (1.8 to 1.3 million years ago) so how does one explain the existence prior to that?

@ni3070

3 жыл бұрын

1. We were not always vegetarian, as advanced human beings though, the idea is to do minimum harm 2. Again, as a superior species minimum harm is expected for spiritual benefit, but Hinduism has never forbidden eating non vegetarian, it's just that one must hunt and eat, then it's fair also some rules are suggested like eating animals with 5 fingers, etc. 3. One must not steal and drink, but it's when calf drinks then we take milk.....

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

You must check some vegan theories, probably might get your answer. Yes, we are omnivores but we can choose not to contribute towards animal cruelty.

@ryanroshan2732

2 жыл бұрын

Our canine teeth are not prominent in our bodies. We have better incisors for that matter. And we are still under the evolution process, we may lose our canines. However, evolution tends to not remove things that are not causing a problem. 2. Hunting was a very old and natural phenomenon. All organisms hunted. Agriculture developed. It was not a sudden process. With generations of artificially selecting species, we got refined sources of food. Agriculture, in the beginning, would not have provided enough food, so they might have relented on hunting and gathering. 3 Obviously dairy is bad period. Now answer my questions, 1. Animal husbandry releases 26% of the GHG emissions. Now how is it justifiable that we pollute the world around us, just for the sake of taste and pleasure? 2. Is it justifiable to kill an animal, only because we have "Canine teeth"?

I amazed by his knowledge, super

@VedicDharam

2 жыл бұрын

gita clearly says that meat is part of tamsik diet. tamsik is the demonic nature. it doesnt lead you closer to god. one has to change his character and diet towards a satvik movement to come more closer to god. you will not find anyone serving meat at the temple or prasad etc.... the gita clearly says this. if you eat meat as a hindu then it is your choice but do not defame hinduism. namaste

If you are killing to eat then I think it is not a sin

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

In case you don't have any plantations around you, in case you live in an area where there can be no crops grown or purchased. Then it's alright. But to kill for taste is a sin.

Hinduism is not polytheistic, it is monotheistic. All the idols are image of one true god or manifestation of god in different forms. That's why hindus despite who they worship have same goal of breaking the cycle of birth-rebirth and attain moksha to get back to param-brahma(one supreme lord/energy)

@kadambahalliveerabhadraiah2801

3 жыл бұрын

This is pure vedic belief . Not Hindu belief . We believe that dead person goes to our home deity/maramma the shakti who's the supreme Deity and they protect us . We don't know do vedic rituals .

@dev9077

3 жыл бұрын

What about different rituals for different gods. By philosophy on some abstract level you can call it monotheistic. But technically Hinduism is pure polytheism

He is presenting his interpretations as facts which could be destroyed by even normal hindu. For eg.-- The meat offering to devi/goddesses has nothing to do with north india - south india. Actually there are only certain goddesses to whom meat and alcohol is offered across india. So it depends on goddess not region.

@anandrmnn

6 жыл бұрын

North Indians (of the cow belt) are Islamized due to 800 years of brutal Islamic invasion, that's why their culture is influenced by be desert cults that want to impose their own culture and food habits on others.

@kadambahalliveerabhadraiah2801

3 жыл бұрын

Not certain, allmost all .

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

Tell me which goddess allows meat offerings? This is so stupid to blame everything on the goddess... I am a kali devotee and I have never ever given her meat but she is forever happy with me... Its just few humans who blame it all on the kind goddess to do the sin they'd like to commit.

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

@@anandrmnn don't the islamics eat meat? Why so stupid?

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

@@anandrmnn it's good that we have to force people to be kind forwards the animals.

Mr. Pattanaik, Debates are healthy as long as they give the positives and discuss the negatives, they become sick when one tries to deplore or disparage others beliefs / traditions or practices. That is when it turns radical / anti HINDU. India has been mostly an agricultural land. And may be 33 Cr microbes in a cows stomach were what we referred to when we talk of gods in a cows stomach. So it was holy for farmers (Subhash Palekar influence). Not so for others, however they all bought food from these farmers and some may be influenced by them. People and politicians are free to propagate whatever suits their interests, but the real problem is not meat eating but breeding to eat meat as a staple diet 3 times a day. Actually milk was also not a dietary requirement about 60 years back. But all of these British buisnesses milk, beef, tea, medicine etc. go hand in hand (Dr. B.M.Hegde influence). Nothing holy or unholy about it. Its just big money that runs media, propaganda and peoples mind. (Colonial rule, WW1&2 and cold war influence) 3 reasons to avoid meat, the 4th is just personal, 1) belly and intestine exercise: ie. retain its capacity to process natural food (meat is processed food and also cooked meat is also not a healthy option) 2) food economy: We feed large animals like cattle for years and eat its meat for maximum a week. Ok for wild life but breeding buisness is a total wastage of resources. 3) envoirnmental impact: meat production is one of the leading causes of greenhouse gas emissions and other pollution in the atmosphere. And the resources needed for feed and water would soon make us look for unnatural forms of nutrition. 4) non-violence: Most meat eaters would not have the guts to look in to the eyes of a mammal they breed (did not find a better word in english) and chop off its head. Try doing it to your dog. Atleast I don't and I would believe my parents don't and also wouldn't want my kids to be so cruel either. Every Indian belief (nothing right or wrong about it) had a logical basis. To eat or not is just a made up question to create differences among people. Its the foreigners, arabs, mughals, english who made these rifts and differences in our societies. And under the great English education or arab funded madrasas we carry the shame forward and blindly adopt everything even distincly related to them. The educated class in our country unconsciously prefers products having English names and despises / is reluctant to follow any harmless traditional practice. Like having a particular kind of food in some seasons or festivals. NOTE: I have lived in other parts of the world and no other country in the world is even close to India in the diversity that we have in food. Cooking has been an art and absolutely no other country knows how to cook vegetables the way we do. The number of traditional vegetable cuisines is innumerable. Cooking raw papayas to banana tree stems to flower jams to thousands of pickles, and god knows what not. Some Asian countries like Thailand have some of these cuisines but lack the geographical diversity. Whereas westerners cant even immagine the enormousness of the traditional cuisines. 75% of the worlds spices comes from India. And now we educated urbans are limiting ourselves to paneer alu and bhindi which have a longer shelf life and easily cooked in restaurants.

@prashantp495

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/hpl2ls5mpq3Wf8Y.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/g4Fmj5KbpNe2h9I.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZKycl7Cigdy1lLQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/doCty9affK2cps4.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/gZOf0NamnZWWc5M.html

@persaud1

3 жыл бұрын

@@prashantp495 👌🙏✊ Dhanyavad

Hinduism is not polytheistic religion. The god or the parmatma is one but there are different visualisation of that gods, rather say Avatars.

@abeidiot

9 ай бұрын

congratulations on the most retarded comment

North Indians - 90% Vegetarian South Indians - 90% Non Vegetarian West Indian - 50-50% mixture of vegetarian nd non vegetaraian East India - 90% Non vegetarian So its the diversity of India just love this diversity nd feel proud to be Indian nd to Vegetarian people don't offend anyone by your rude comments. I have full proof that ancient Indians were 100% Non Vegetarian . Its only after the arrival of Jainism nd Buddhism India became Vegetarian.

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

Cruelty is cruelty... Its fair to call spade a spade.

@ryanroshan2732

2 жыл бұрын

I am sorry but your data is flawed. 70-80% of the west Indians are Vegetarian, while North India has a larger Non-vegetarian quota. I don't really care what ancient Indians were, I just know what is right and what is wrong. Ancient Indians used to hunt, (and they did not have the resources), however what about today, rich Indians have all the resources to be vegetarian. Why can't they? Vegetarianism is the correct way.

lol this is how you misinform people

Names video Vegetarianism in Hinduism Talks pretty much on Non Vegetarianism in Hinduism

As an East Indian (Coastal Oriya) brahmin - fish is our staple. Mutton and chicken occasionally. No beef of course. Buffalo yes. Non veg consumption should not be a parameter for a real hindu. in Bali, their hindus roast entire pigs for festivals and marriages. Assam, Bengal, Manipur, Odisha, Bihar, NE, Kerala and few other places brahmins diet is non veg. The vegetarian nazis of present day India are imposing their unhealthy, myopic and bigoted views of Sanatana Dharma on the rest of us. North Indian culture and present day fetish of cow worship is backward, heavily influenced by abrhamic influences and a stain on a modern Hindu thought ecosystem. Raja Ram Mohan Roy would be spinning in his resting space looking at what has happened to "reformed" Hinduism. Cow is more precious than humans. Just crazy!

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

Reformed Hinduism is performing animal cruelty? Okay lol

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

Just look at how many westerners now are following veganism and perhaps change your reformed beliefs?

@shekondog

3 жыл бұрын

@@SS-bw6cn And your version is plant cruelty? LOl Ok. Plants lives matters

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

@@shekondog do they have the ability to feel pain? Do they cry? Do they shed tears? If not, then shut up.

@ryanroshan2732

2 жыл бұрын

@@shekondog Plants lack neuroreceptors, they cannot be subjected to cruelty. That's basic biology.

scroll has made a video on Hinduism it has to be a demeaning one because they can't respect Hinduism

@SelfStudyNResearch

3 жыл бұрын

He's explaining hinduism, not demeaning it. Think rational.

@kadambahalliveerabhadraiah2801

3 жыл бұрын

You are a veg brahmin ha ?

there is no need to be touchy, devdutt pattanaik is not an ultimate source in hindu law, he is Management guy who helped kishor biyani set up big bazaar and now helping himself making devdutt a brand, it is all business, read the vedas or learn sanskrit by yourself to explore, most things which pattanaik talks sometimes is nonsense, where non veg is considered, hindu eternal law forbids paining animals, although eating is not forbidden, and cow is sacred for the benefits it offers as an naimal, so we don't kill them, there may be other view points too. the conclusion is scroll is a marxist leaning website, has an agenda, and devudtt is trying to fit in, that's it. so relax guys

@rohitadhatrao6877

5 жыл бұрын

hinduism is not the right word, it is sanatan dharma or eternal law or vedic worship

@SS-bw6cn

3 жыл бұрын

Why are only cows hyped up by Hindus... Shri krishna said for every animal, there shouldn't be any cruelty.