You still have no valid explanation for the Falcon Heavy rocket USSF-67, that was filmed from multiple locations. Myrtle Beach SC saw it eventually 90+ seconds after it launched and when it was 22km up. It's like it was not allowed to be seen, blocked by something for that minute and a half but as soon as it crossed the horizon there was no restriction and it went on its merry way. What blocked it all that time? A 6 foot wave? Cinnacon and Whereswally made supercuts from multiple locations. Impossible to explain on a flat earth but perfectly predictable for a globe earth. Then there is Jesse Gordon's video measuring a dip angle from Mt.Scott to a much taller Mt.Shasta. No valid explanation for that either. He physically pointed his theodolite down to measure the angle to a mountain 1 mile taller! We both agree that refraction makes distant things appear lifted so why did he point his device down? These things can be predicted using the globe model and refraction. There is math for it that works, unlike yours. And what about the final experiment? Will you concede if they see a 24 hr sun or will you concoct some elaborate story about glass dome reflections?
@roohifАй бұрын
Get away from the surface, Brian.
@planereality3675
Ай бұрын
Stop saying ships go over a curve roohif. Every single glober says that a ship disappearing over the horizon is proof of the earth curvature. You just want to move the goal post. It doesn't matter how high you go. The horizon has nothing to do with earth curve. The horizons position is an effect of refraction and the convergence of the ground and sky. Not earth curve You failed on Jerans observation of the island, when he actually looked at the footage it's clear to see that virtually the entire island is visible, possibly only a few hundred feet missing ove 70 to 80 miles. Your failed attempt to just measure that lighthouse should be something you retracted and apologise for, but instead, you will double down because admitting you are wrong is not something I think you would be capable of, in this instance.
@slappingthebass2271
Ай бұрын
Bro FE core tests debunk the globe with its horizontal laser test and you’re still over here… time to get on the Centrelink rudolf
@brianleake7762Ай бұрын
Shawn Hawkins got destroyed in this debate!!!
@BackYardGardeningTip
23 күн бұрын
Of course Shawn get's destroyed, he has no truth.
@BackYardGardeningTip
23 күн бұрын
I would love to have a link to that debate. Thanks
Пікірлер: 10
Excellent, thanks
*Frankenstein's monster has a flat head.*
You still have no valid explanation for the Falcon Heavy rocket USSF-67, that was filmed from multiple locations. Myrtle Beach SC saw it eventually 90+ seconds after it launched and when it was 22km up. It's like it was not allowed to be seen, blocked by something for that minute and a half but as soon as it crossed the horizon there was no restriction and it went on its merry way. What blocked it all that time? A 6 foot wave? Cinnacon and Whereswally made supercuts from multiple locations. Impossible to explain on a flat earth but perfectly predictable for a globe earth. Then there is Jesse Gordon's video measuring a dip angle from Mt.Scott to a much taller Mt.Shasta. No valid explanation for that either. He physically pointed his theodolite down to measure the angle to a mountain 1 mile taller! We both agree that refraction makes distant things appear lifted so why did he point his device down? These things can be predicted using the globe model and refraction. There is math for it that works, unlike yours. And what about the final experiment? Will you concede if they see a 24 hr sun or will you concoct some elaborate story about glass dome reflections?
Get away from the surface, Brian.
@planereality3675
Ай бұрын
Stop saying ships go over a curve roohif. Every single glober says that a ship disappearing over the horizon is proof of the earth curvature. You just want to move the goal post. It doesn't matter how high you go. The horizon has nothing to do with earth curve. The horizons position is an effect of refraction and the convergence of the ground and sky. Not earth curve You failed on Jerans observation of the island, when he actually looked at the footage it's clear to see that virtually the entire island is visible, possibly only a few hundred feet missing ove 70 to 80 miles. Your failed attempt to just measure that lighthouse should be something you retracted and apologise for, but instead, you will double down because admitting you are wrong is not something I think you would be capable of, in this instance.
@slappingthebass2271
Ай бұрын
Bro FE core tests debunk the globe with its horizontal laser test and you’re still over here… time to get on the Centrelink rudolf
Shawn Hawkins got destroyed in this debate!!!
@BackYardGardeningTip
23 күн бұрын
Of course Shawn get's destroyed, he has no truth.
@BackYardGardeningTip
23 күн бұрын
I would love to have a link to that debate. Thanks