I love your connection to science and psychology and business your mind is amazing!

Easily some of the most important information in applied behavioral economics I've heard. As far as I can see this is very on point, very insightful. I think Dan Pink is on to something, and it's exciting.

It's an amazing talk. Human behaviors are strange and hard to understand most of the time.

Thanks everyone for your comments. Please, please show your love for the RSAnimate series and vote for RSAnimate - Drive - in the Webby Awards in the Animation category. Help us continue to spread world-changing ideas farther and wider (and always for free)! Vote here: webby.aol.com/entries/59107

Dan Pink, you Sir are a Genius!!!!

Real motivational drive

I'm glad to see Danny Tanner is still finding work.

@intermender Other guy is Matthew Taylor - CE of the RSA. Maybe check out his RSA Animate Left Brain, Right Brain if you liked his questions? It's on the RSA Channel under RSA Animate playlists. Thanks for the feedback - really appreciate it. Becca :)

@skaruts I totally agree, I worked at a corporate ran restaurant who hired managers from seniority and not actual trained management. These people would focus in on anything negative that was done and very little on the positives. Recognition in my opinion falls under purpose. If we do something very well and are recognized for it. I think this sense of belonging builds up in us of doing something better that people appreciate and the purpose in which we do it becomes more satisfying.

Blender 3D is another great example of people doing extraordinary things for other people for free.

The 3rd drive is the one that is rarely found. One thing for sure is that it is in abundance in independent men of learning. Animal -> Human

I have worked at a Hotel for almost 3 years, (I don't believe in Hotels, btw) and what I can say is that I never felt good with it. I worked hard for about 6 months, despite the pay wasn't so great as it should be for a 4 stars hotel (and later as 5 stars the pay was not any better) but the biggest turn down I faced there was that I never got any recognition for what I did well. Bosses always seemed to focus only on what we failed doing. That has always been my biggest incentive: Recognition.

Dan, that is great, you are really good presenter, I found it when I prepared myself for managerial training

@armandotrenton194

3 жыл бұрын

i know it's quite off topic but does anyone know of a good site to stream newly released series online ?

@issackylo2019

3 жыл бұрын

@Armando Trenton lately I have been using FlixZone. You can find it on google =)

@trippgiovanni6581

3 жыл бұрын

@Issac Kylo yup, been watching on Flixzone for since march myself :)

@armandotrenton194

3 жыл бұрын

@Issac Kylo thanks, signed up and it seems to work :D Appreciate it!!

@issackylo2019

3 жыл бұрын

@Armando Trenton Happy to help :)

Everything humans does is driven by motivation - to achieve what we like ... does not have to be financial.... people are motivated by tons of things... not money in particular

@simulacrae It gets much better after a few minutes and the pain becomes tolerable. Some great ideas make it worth wading through.

I'm trying to show a new horizon to my workmates, a diferent paradigm, but most of them do not speak enlglish or understand it. I think that this kind of provoking videos should have subtitles in brazilian portuguese! Anyways - I'm going to translate the RSA Animate of this issue and broadcast in my company. Great Job!

Dan Pink has come up 3 times in the last day from different directions. Science and economic studies that explain the conflicts I have been seeing in business and organizations for decades. I have a whole new paradigm to work from and share with others. A Question - what is better? 1) To watch 'TED' type (RSA, BookNotes, TED, Charlie Rose, etc) talks of thought leaders that are the distillation of their work after presenting it 100's of time. 2) Or to read the source work with all depth?

@derghb The second test conducted in India was done with the same parameters as the first test done in the US. The only difference is that the monetary rewards were more significant in the Indian experiment because $50 USD to a person in India can purchase a lot more compared to what can be purchased in the US.

My name is Jonathan, and the first couple minutes of this video made me hungry for a ham and cheese sandwich.

@derghb: he said it that way, but the way it's meant to be taken is, the people knew the rewards before they took the test.

@prosumero also, volume leveling!!

eheh yes and he got a big bonus when he left the Company

What the hell? Why does this have more views than David Harvey?

Its inspiration

is this the dad form Full House

I like his style but was surprised that he was surprised by the findings - seems that he was unaware of research from 1959 - Herzberg's motivation-hygiene theory

this interesting video should have subtitles in the main global languages (spanish, chinese, france, german,...)

He may have considered that theory but left it to one side because of the criticisms about the collection of data regarding satisfaction and dissatisfaction: apparently the results were most likely an artefact of the use of the Critical Incident Technique as the collection method. This pisses me off because I'd kinda gotten attached to that theory :( Vroom's Expectancy Theory might have been an interesting theory for him to study as part of his research for this book.

How is that any different from the understanding of money on which his argument lies? Of course money can't be exchanged for what we gain from autonomy, mastery, and purpose, but that's part of what validates his argument. Money can buy you food, and clothes, and shelter, but it won't buy you everything you need to be your most productive. It can't substitute for autonomy, mastery, and purpose.

Is this woody??

Did Daniel Pink just copy Hull's Drive Motivational Theory? Can someone confirm this?

He was obviously very well paid.

@iWillMedia The speaker said we human beings do things because it is interesting and self-gratifying to do so. But he missed one thing. People very often do things out of the "expectation" that it would turn out to be interesting or self-gratifying, instead of it is interesting and self-gratifying to do so per se. Gambling is one example. Many housewives buy useless fancy kitchen gadgets because people using those gadgets were always cooking happily in TV promotional shows. Expect...

Marx said this ages ago with his theory of alienation and species being in Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844.

but like he said - a lot of new ideas come when you are relaxed. (like the example with cake and beers), so this could possibly fail. Sorry, for dated reply.

My main gripe with this video is that Dan seems to be skimming over the issues/research and jumping to conclusions. E.G. some of our main motivators/drives are gathering resources and raising offspring safely. So, when he says punishment doesn't work because the parents were late even with the fine, he didn't consider the fact that maybe 1: the fine was too small (would they be late if we were talking about 200 dollars?) 2: what if the punishment was getting the kids kicked out of the daycare?

whoever took care of the Sound wasn't very motivated. or you motivated the wrong guy.

@TheRealXenon americans will have to understand chinese videos too, but subtitles would help, would'nt?

Not really. The typical corporate work environment and salary structure completely robs the individual of any sense of autonomy and purpose. Not hard to understand at all. What's truly baffling is how we got so divorced from our own nature that we're now having difficulty seeing the simple truth.

before understanding needs/motives/drive/desire we need to accept the truth that humans evolved, obviously from animals and the first two(namely biological and pecuniary) any animal will do; in case of pecuniary interest they(animal) have something else all of which is more inclined towards primitive animal nature, while the 3rd one is what humans are meant for but large population of human species haven't yet evolved into humans(internal trait) even though they have human form(external).

Don't watch this with head or earphones.

daniel pink looks like bob saget

`great video, commentators read like they are blinded by the carrot. worrying sign

@TheRealXenon hence, americans should also have to understand chinese videos, souldnt they? For sure, but they will understand it much better with subtitles

bob saget rules!!!

Andy from Weeds?

This is just a way to make human capital more productive. No different then watching a video about how to make a machine run better to be more productive. Why do people think that this some new age way to do business?

Incentives and penalties work.... dont agree. Just put the lateness charge so high the day care can afford handsome overtime the teacher having to stay behind... and a profit...

Sort of beating a dead horse, but nonetheless in a way that can grab other people's attention.

To follow up my previous comment: wouldn't you work your ass off if you knew that you'd get 3 months salary for 1 week? Even in a creative profession.

Intelligence is hot. In fact it makes this somewhat average looking fellow very hot.

Terrible sound... shame!

@claudiubanu8438

7 жыл бұрын

ABC in the beginning, yes.