"When they were half a year old, and stronger, the girls and their mother sailed to Driftmark, whilst Daemon flew AHEAD with BOTH dragons." Fire & Blood, page 376

@bettinanielsen6336

Жыл бұрын

thank you. Page 376 - I'm on it.

@rachelelabbady3399

Жыл бұрын

Danerys controlled 3 dragons, even jon snow could ride one, doesn't mean it was loyal to just Jon.

@bettinanielsen6336

Жыл бұрын

@@rachelelabbady3399 Please don't snap at me. In the books Dany doean't control the dragons. Not even Drogon.

@rachelelabbady3399

Жыл бұрын

@@bettinanielsen6336 whose snapping at who?? Nobody "controls" dragons if your wanting to get specific about wording. Targaryens, especially those with stronger magic like Danerys, can interact, ride, and communicate with multiple dragons at a time. Danerys traveled with all 3 of hers constantly including crossing seas etc.

@rachelelabbady3399

Жыл бұрын

@@bettinanielsen6336 you used the word "control" in the video, so I used it in a reply. Dragons are not slaves, so therefore will do whatever they want whenever they want. I personally feel the more magic in a targaryans blood dictates how much dragons will interact with them, or be directed. Danerys was connected to all 3 of her dragons as we saw when the 2 smaller ones escaped from under the pyramid as she flew past them. We also saw her communicate with them in the house of the undying.

A huge flaw in Aemond's character is that even though he was obsessed with dragons, he never really GOT what dragon bonding is all about. It's more subconscious telepathy and not just ordering them around with a "serve me", very similar to the Stark-direwolf bond wherein the direwolf will FEEL what you are feeling, remember Summer getting angry at Jojen when Bran was angry at him even though Bran did not want Summer to attack Jojen? I think the similarity of the Starks to the Targaryens is what Rhaegar figured out in his excessive readings. The Starks have been trying to hide their telepathic abilities ever since Torrhen Stark bent the knee, in order to stay safe (Starks were persecuted by the Boltons and skinned for this reason and the collapsed crypts of Winterfell may have been collapsed on purpose). Rhaegar figured out that Stark blood is special just like Targaryen blood, and found that the song of ICE and FIRE was a Targaryen breeding with a Stark, and hence pursued Lyanna (not out of love or anything).

@tanxilhanif

Жыл бұрын

And just like it is said Targaryens have dragon blood, Starks are said to have wolf blood .. they also have dreams with visions of the future like Targaryens and can also warg their direwolves

@atro-city

Жыл бұрын

@@tanxilhanif yeah but starks can bond with any animal and warg into them too, seems similar but still a little different. Targaryens are dragon specific and their bond is more subconscious. I don't think we've seen a targaryen who staright up warged into a dragon. Still, there i definitely a connection there. I think the people who engineered the Valyrian race made use of Stark/ warg DNA to some extent.

@kerrirae

Жыл бұрын

@@atro-city The term warging is strictly for bonding with wolves. Bonding with any other animal (or human) is skin changing. They say once you bond or warg a wolf, you are married and your souls are as one. Definitely seems like the dragon bond with the Targs and the wolf bond with the Starks are the most similar in terms of bonding but I also believe the children of the forest had something to do with the creation of the Targaryen's so it would make sense in the grand scheme of things

@SingingSealRiana

Жыл бұрын

@@tanxilhanif looks like different expressions of a similar thing. In both cases we see an affinity to horseriding for example and an exchange in traits the wolfs effect their humans mood and character just as much as the other way around and drogon, the dragon Dany actualy bonded with reacts to her just the same. She has no control over him at all, but he comes her aid, gets aggressiv through her fear, cries out when she orgasms . . . one can aknowlage the parallels without calling them the exact same, you know?

@SingingSealRiana

Жыл бұрын

@@kerrirae yeah, but it still allowes for other, lesser bonds, like arya skinchanging cats, lyanna and brandons bonding to horses in generel and Dany bonding to her silver

I really like this theory that Daemon will control three dragons, and that he paid a blood price that cost him and Rhaenyra their daughter Visenya - very sad but definitely makes sense.

Also we should really take note that Dany is a direct decendant of Daemon...so there may even be something to that as well. Just a random thought

@FeyFire

Жыл бұрын

There are so many parallels between them, really 🔥🔥

Жыл бұрын

I LOVE THIS

Joe Magician presented a theory about the true meaning of one dragon with three heads (not three dragons, three heads, one rider- or three dragons, three heads, three riders, as often theorized during GoT). He spoke of the blood magic used to bind dragons to their family lineage and suggests that the three heads are, in fact: the dragon; the rider; and the spirit of the one sacrificed by blood to bind the dragon, who lives inside the dragon still. So far, that is the most plausible theory I've heard on this topic yet. As for you point about Daemon controlling Vhagar, I think it's just as plausible that Vhagar followed because she knew she was accompanying her rider on the journey. If you look at the song lyrics again, the idea that Daemon and Vermithor's interaction is waking up a third head, or the spirit of the blood sacrifice living within Vermithor, seems pretty likely.

@BrokenXgirl12

Жыл бұрын

I saw this theory too from David Lightbringer! I 100% agree with the theory it would make logical sense knowing what we do know about Valyria!

@kerrirae

Жыл бұрын

Yes! I really like this theory

@sarahfraser6242

Жыл бұрын

In the book, daemon can’t control the unspoken for dragons. I think daemons Valyrian singing is more about making sure the dragon recognizes him and doesn’t kill him on sight because of the blood tie. Vermithor had at this point been living alone for a very long time. And wild dragons do not like their lairs disturbed. But as implied at the show at the table when daemon says we can find riders for those dragons, he cannot have more than one. He specifically has to go to great lengths to procure riders for the remaining dragons.

I don't think Daemon was controlling Vhagar. She was just flying to wherever her rider, Laena was going.

Brilliant! Love your theory. I've been saying something similar since Dameon spent copious time in the Pentos library reading about the Valerian conquerors. The showrunners have made many changes to the books, making the show far more interesting. Let's hope they dispense with the silly gossip of the book and go this route with Daemon and Rhaenyra - who are the ancestors of Danny. Subscribed for this.

@FeyFire

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching! Yes I think he's discovered some really unique knowledge hidden away, and hopefully we'll get to see some of the details and 🤞 Valyrian magic!

I think I already told you I'm huge Matt Smith fan and think he actually has a good voice. Great vid. I still need to finish Fire and Blood. I didn't know Laena had a "monstrous" child too. Much love🖤🐉🎃🕷️ I'm wondering what ends up happening to that dagger

@FeyFire

Жыл бұрын

Yes seeing what happens with the dagger will be very interesting! That will be a fun/sad twist for the end of the show. And yes, that third child for Daemon seems to be a curse. I have a lot more to say about it, I'll probably make another video talking about it. I started to include it all in this essay but it was becoming a monster!

@WildeMermaid

Жыл бұрын

@@FeyFire Yes please do a video about this. I find it so interesting how Daemon never gets his third child "of the set," especially as his first 2 are daughters & he loses his son, then his next 2 are sons & he loses his daughter. He gets so close each time...

I think it is a good way to make the battle above the gods eye even more tragic

This has me thinking of vicerys (the begger king). Was he onto something when he would say you don't want to wake the dragon? Did he know that you have to be very careful when waking a dragon? He was right about a lot of other things like which houses would support him if he returned to westeros. And dany speaks high valyrian so he must have been the one to teach it to her. Did he know more than we thought or what? Thoughts?

"it was not my war to start" is kind of ironic, because by leaving to warn Rhaenyra she actually started the war, whereas if she had killed the greens, that would have immediately ended all possibility of a continent wide war. There still couldve been a minor Reach rebellion with Tessarion but 1 dragon against Rhaenyra is a crapshoot. Did Rhaenys think that when Jace and Luke are killed, somehow Baela and Rhaena would be spared?

@tanxilhanif

Жыл бұрын

Bro how would've the story continued if Rhaenys had killed them all then and there ..

@jeffreym8503

Жыл бұрын

Yeah her excuse is stupid her granddaughters are betrothed to both of rhaenyra's boys and are fully invested in this conflict so it is most definitely her war too

@user-zv2vm8bd8h

Жыл бұрын

Don't try to make sense of Rhaenys' character in the show. She is the one character they seem to write through an ideological modern feminist lense and it shows. She is a mess.

@davidbuckley2435

8 ай бұрын

@@jeffreym8503 Yeah, especially when a very simple answer is right there. "There probably be a war, but I'm no kinslayer. I'm sitting this one out." Then Corlys' scene later where he talks to Rhaenyra and decides to support her has some real weight since that gets Rhaenys back in the fight, kinslaying be damned.

Damn I’m soooo happy I found this channel!!! I just started binge watching and I’m in love with your content and voice! New subscriber

@FeyFire

Жыл бұрын

Thank you so much! Appreciate you! 🔥

@bluejean4882

Жыл бұрын

@@FeyFire and WE appreciate you! I about lost it when you said “Dragon slinging contest”😂😂😂

Well done,lots of good points,and ideas😊😊😊

I like this theory. I for one was hoping the song was something more familiar, rather than him learning it from studying the histories, I thought it would be cool if he heard his grand sire, Jaehaerys, actually singing the song to vermathor, so he led with something familiar so the dragon knew he came in peace. Just me hopefully speculating.

When Dany went into the pyre, Mirri Maz Duur was also singing, so I guess is an important part of blood magic and dragon binding as well as the sacrifice, seems to me that is related with the title of the series, A Song of Ice and Fire

@FeyFire

Жыл бұрын

Love this 🔥

Fucking amazing video as always!

I think this is brilliant!Thank you!

@FeyFire

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching!

That was some good shit. Great vid

@FeyFire

Жыл бұрын

Thank you for watching!

Fantastic vid @Fey Fire! I appreciate how you get me thinking... What's super fun about HotD for me, [besides the awesome acronym!], is the fact that it's filling in the non-written history of Westeros. I love that about all historical fiction, but how cool is it that we get to see it played out about a story that we love!?! Thank you again for the excellent vid & theory, & yes, I think it would be badass if we get to see Daemon "mindmeld" with multiple WMD's!!! [In the "Coolest Bad Boy on HotD!" category, that may get him equal standing W/his grandnephew-nephew Aemond & his magnificent behemoth Vhaegar! What do you think?!] 🤘😆🤘🔥❤‍🔥🔥WMD = Dragon Power! 🔥❤‍🔥🔥 🤘😆🤘 WMD = Weaponizing Multiple Dragons! 💪🔥🔥🐲💪🔥🔥🐉💪🔥🔥🐲💪💪💖💖💖✨✨

@FeyFire

Жыл бұрын

My bad boy trinity is Daemon/Aemond/Maegor and I'm not even sorry!! 😂😍🔥 Thank you for watching! I appreciate you!

This "3rd" part convinces us of alot of things, Aegon 1 had 3 dragons and 2 queens(making them 3 kids), Viserys 1 had 2 brothers(making them 3 kids), Viserys 1 had 3 kids(with Aemma), Aegon 2 having 3 kids, Daemon having 3 kids from each wives, Rhaenyra having 3 kids from each lover, Viserys 2 having 3 kids, Jon/Aegon is the 3rd child of Rhaegar, Danaerys having 3 dragons just like Aegon, There are many other sets of 3 kids from non-King Targaryens too

I like your theory! I hope it happens that way in the show.

@FeyFire

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching! 🐲

@tanxilhanif

Жыл бұрын

Great and interesting theory .. it would be great if they do it this way rather than that dragonseeds.. or even if they want to do it they can have one instead of two coz ulf the white and Hugh the hammer have an exactly similar story ..

David light bringer has a really cool theory thay the dragons have the souls of ancient targaryens in them and that's why the valarians were still very incestuous even though there were other valarians, only someone related to the ancient valarian could control the dragon and the 3 heads are the targaryen soul(who was put into the dragon through blood magic) the dragon itself and the rider

Where did you get the translation? That's so cool!!!! I can't wait to go look at the new book!! I'm sure I'll buy it 😁 that's a rhetorical question. You don't have to say!!! I wonder how many dragons he can control. 3? Or more? Did Borros just not want to learn to read? He would have had people to teach him🤣he is a traitor!!

@jamiemacdonald5203

Жыл бұрын

A lot of Lords saw reading as beneath them that was something for the maesters. Not all lords obviously the more strategic minded would see the benefit. The Lords of stormsend are usually more interested in fighting, fucking and hunting.

@ShadeoftheEvening

Жыл бұрын

@@jamiemacdonald5203 🤣so true. My last name is McDonald too. Kerri 🙋

@tanxilhanif

Жыл бұрын

Maybe he knew how to read but didn't want to, coz he was too proud to do it and wanted his maester to do it for him .. didn't Rhaenyra say he's an extremely proud man

I think the show will go it's own way while the big events will still be included. Daemon's body was not found in the books so the show will probably have him survive or show his death beyond doubt.

I was thinking that they could have season 2 start as Shireen reading about HOTD, and then we see season 1 over again with more nuance without the bias of whoever wrote the book. You know what Winston Churchill said "History is Written by The Victors."

I'm not so sure Daemon had "control" over Vhagar, so much. Rather Vhagar just followed him home. As for his lullaby to Vermithor, it was moreso to get Vermithor reacquainted with people, making it easier to find him a rider, preferable for the Blacks. Planning ahead as it were, where the Greens don't have the mind to do so. Daemon's experience n such matters give the Blacks that advantage, even though it does end up backfiring on them, at the time, his plan was a sound one. I think the show is gonna have a massive twist where Adam of Hull is concerned. I believe Adam of Hull is going to end up being Laenor Valaryan. Henceforth why Corliss is so swift to name him his heir. Their betrayal made easy due solely to Rhaenys's demise. The decision made easy when u factor n the fact that she died alone. Had Caraxes, Cyrax, or even Vermax had even so much had been there, so much would've ended very differently. Even if she still died regardless, Corliss's feelings on the matter would've been very different, I imagine. Her dying alone, along with the inaction of the Blacks, was just too much for the Sea Snake to bear. Lest we forget, he only sided with the Blacks for the wishes of his wife, saying shortly after healing from his wounds how everything Rhaenyra touches turns to ash (regarding his son's "death") and Rhaenys explaining to him how Rhaenyra was being the only voice of reason trying to avoid war at council. It was only then that Corliss gave fealty to the Blacks. Anyway, back to the case n point, ii don't believe Daemon had control over Vhagar. He was just guiding her home. That's just me. It does make for a good debate, however. Great video, well narrated. Subscribing now. Thank You for your efforts. Keep up the good work. 👍😁🤜🤛🤙💯✌️

Like you analyses, maybe the duel between aemond and daemon will end up easier than both of them killed, I have a feeling Daemon might have a different fate than in the book, but Rannera most likely will, because it was cemented in GOT.

@WildeMermaid

Жыл бұрын

Well as Daemon's body is never found in the books, his fate can definitely be something they play with in the show. It's not likely he could survive that fall realistically but you never know with fantasy. I'm looking forward to how they may expand on that.

Great video! I think the following season of Hot-D will move away from the very limited story told in the book. Everyone talks about the three unreliable resources Maester Gyldayn used for his book. However Gyldayn was writing the book for King Robert. King Robert hated the Targaryens. I am sure Maester Gyldayn would go out of his way to make the Targaryens look as bad as possible, so Gyldayn's accounts are unreliable also. Based on the changes in the show so far, House of the Dragon seems to be a true telling of the story, which means the book is unreliable. Again, great video!

Love this.my bestie is hellq smart.😍😍😍😍😍

@FeyFire

Жыл бұрын

My bestie is hella beautiful 😍🐲

Damon is a great character

Couldnt a pregnant Laena have just commanded Vhgar to follow Daemon and Caraxes and that she would catch up later? Its kind of unclear how specific you can get with commanding dragons.

@FeyFire

Жыл бұрын

It's very unclear how specific you can get when commanding dragons... But I come back to 'a dragon is not a slave.' If a rider could command a dragon to go places, they wouldn't have reason to go themselves. So I believe they need to be present - but I could definitely be wrong!

@chrisrubin6445

Жыл бұрын

@@FeyFire well i think the advantage to going to battle with your dragon is being able to aim the carnage, for example a riderless Vermithor at tumbleton, cant destroy any armies, just attacks randomly, and also during the riot of kings landing, if Syrax had a rider, she could have burned the rioters without landing and becoming vulnerable, so even if dragonriders could send their dragon places, it wouldnt be useful in a war, atleast to my mind.

@shockwave1126

Жыл бұрын

Or Vhagar just follows her as she senses Laena's presence. Dany did not ride Drogon when sailing to Westeros either. However, the theory presented here is quite plausible since Dany commanded the other dragons even though she did not ride them and they were in the magic number 3.

@chrisrubin6445

Жыл бұрын

@@shockwave1126 well, in this case Vhgar goes ahead with Daemon and Caraxes, while a pregnant Laena follows on ship after them

this theory is amazing

@FeyFire

Жыл бұрын

Thank you! 🐲🔥

His veiw of the Gods!?

Aemond took a dragon that wasn’t his to take. He was greedy. A Hightower flaw.

Its a side track, but since it's brought up, I feel like Rhaenys didn't torch the greens because a lot of her old supporters (And Corlys) would have seen it as her making a bid for the throne. She has made peace with that and would rather act as support. I think she knew if she took action like that she'd be looking at Driftmark and mayyyybe the Baratheons snd whomever supported her in the great council that hasn't thrown themselves behind either the blacks or the Greens. And she'd only have the one Dragon. It's not a winning scenario so she didn't take it.

They keep making Deamons character more badass and tried to take away from Aemonds book counterpart. They should have made Aemond just as brutal and close to vhagar. Now when the battle over the Gods Eye takes place its not even going to be shocking. I do have a theory have what will happen to Deamon after but I’ll hold to prevent any spoilers. Also I want Hugh Hammer to be a beast.

but then why didn't he imprint on vhagar when laena died?

@momo7989

Жыл бұрын

They were in mourning.. And honestly vhagar was too.

Of all the Targaryans, Daemon is closest to being a true dragon; a magical creature. This is why I believe that he will end up on the Isle of Faces. The children/weirwoods need the knowledge he has. And being the most in tuned with Targaryan/ Valerian magic/blood magic, he is an obvious choice for the Children, green men etc. Perhaps Nettles had a connection with them? Perhaps a deal was struck? This wouldl help him fulfill his oath " An eye for an eye. A son for a son. Lucerys will be avenged." Daemon's capacity for patience in fury is not obvious, but I think the seething hate he feels towards Aemond is. ( No I don't think he was responsible for you-know-what. I'm putting that on Larys Strong. Why does he cut the weirwood tree? Why? Why is it mentioned? If he is aided in bringing down Aemon, maybe he has promised to sacrfice himself to the trees. If would also help to explain (a bit) why the weirwoods chose Bloodraven for the 3-eyed-crow. Yeah, its a wild theory, but I love it.

@FeyFire

Жыл бұрын

I love this, and it ties a lot of things together for the future, like Howland visiting the Isle then immediately facilitating R+L. And Nettles being connected to the Children is perfect - her name! 💚 This is great.

@bettinanielsen6336

Жыл бұрын

@@FeyFire Thank you. You know, when you think up a theory and think you're alone and its crazy? Its nice to know that I make a little sense. :) The way Nettles and Daemon's parting is described is so sad. Plus the fact that he knew he wouldn't return.

Daemon is a dragon like dany

@FeyFire

Жыл бұрын

💯 agree

Wat I wanna know is why danys first child was born monstrous ... Ijs should she have had 3 b4 that??

@FeyFire

Жыл бұрын

I think Dany's sacrifice was the price for her dragons; whereas Daemon already has a dragon, but wants the ability to fly another one...or two. I definitely have more thoughts on Daemon and his monstrous third children!

@jackiesidman6464

Жыл бұрын

@@FeyFire true but it still don't explain why her baby came out deformed like a dragon that has been dead for a long time the books say that but from house of dragon it took up to 3 pregnancies to have a dragon like child wat I wanna know is why Danny's 1st born is deformed I understand sacrifice so she can get the dragon eggs to hatch but doesn't explain why the child is deformed

@tanxilhanif

Жыл бұрын

@@jackiesidman6464 maybe the side effects of blood magic

They sure burnt her 😅

a thought popped in my head. I'm rewatching GoT. Dany could control 3 dragons. I know the circumstances are different. Hers only know her. Like I said, just a thought and it's making me think it's something a Targaryen can do. 3 Heads of the Dragon 🖤🐉🤔

@FeyFire

Жыл бұрын

I think there are a lot of similarities between Dany and Daemon. They are using similar rituals to bond dragons. Dany's was different in that hers was a miracle - bringing dragons back into the world, whereas Daemon has live dragons to work with. I'm excited to find more parallels with them, because I think there are MANY! Let me know if you catch any more on the rewatch. 🖤🐲🔥

@ShadeoftheEvening

Жыл бұрын

@@FeyFire alright girl. Will do 👍 That would be a great video. You're probably already working on one 😁🖤🐉

Daemon controlling two dragons shouldn’t be news because, if you remember, Danaerys controlled three dragons ….

Everyone keeps forgetting that Dany had 3 dragons. I don’t understand this whole thing about nobody ever has more than one dragon?

@FeyFire

Жыл бұрын

Dany was the last dragon rider, and her dragons were a miracle. No one else prior had done it.

In S2 Daemon will fly riderless Dragons for sure.

Danerys had 3 dragons that she controlled. So obviously, targaryans CAN control more then one dragon. 🙄

@FeyFire

Жыл бұрын

Name another then 🙄

@rachelelabbady3399

Жыл бұрын

@@FeyFire Daemon obviously as stated in the video.

@rachelelabbady3399

Жыл бұрын

@@FeyFire We see daemon singing to Vermithor. There is something in certain targaryens that appeal to multiple different dragons regardless of who they ride specifically. I bet you danerys fireproof gene came directly from Daemon and we will see him use it later in the series.

@dastellarnapster1652

2 ай бұрын

She nurtured 3, she only rode 1

U shouldn't give out information that isn't true... The Velaryons did not gain the ability to ride dragons.. the only Velaryons that ride dragons are the ones that have Targaryen blood ie; Laenor, Laena. They are the only 2 "Velaryons" that ride Dragons.. Rhaenys is a Targaryen/Baratheon and therefore can ride/bond with a dragon. No pure blood Velaryons or those mixed with other blood can do this. So no. The Velaryons did not gain the ability to do this.

@FeyFire

9 ай бұрын

Definition of gain: to obtain or secure (something desired, favorable, or profitable). So yes, they did gain the ability. Corlys married Rhaenys and obtained the ability of dragon riding in his offspring.

Daemon never controls vhagar ??? what lol, and nobody has ever controlled more than one dragon at a time and never will, and if you say Daenerys has then I strongly encourage you to go read (ASOIAF) more specifically, A Dance with Dragons. Daenerys barely has control of Drogon let alone, Rhaegal and Viserion. Its also why she has the other 2 chained and locked away. It is in my opinion more likely that Daemon is singing about the very act of dragon binding here and not about 3 dragons or 3 dragon riders specifically, rather he is singing about the very act of dragon binding when he says "but 2 heads, to a third sing" Its a theory that the very souls of Valryrian ancestors are inside the Dragons and this was achieved through some sort of blood magic which he also references in the song. Its from this that the Targaryens get their ability to bond to the dragons, The 2 heads are the Dragon and the Rider, and they are singing to the spirit of the a past Valyrian soul, this is the third head. What he is doing here is awakening this spirit inside vermithor to get him ready to claim another rider again as Vermothor has not had a Rider sonce Viserys father Jahaerys. If you have read Fire and Blood then you know who will eventually claim Vermithor and its not Daemon ill just say that.

@FeyFire

Жыл бұрын

I read a quote directly from The Rogue Prince by George RR Martin. If you missed it. I don't think I'd be making videos on ASOIAF if I'd never read the series or accompanying books. 🤨

@fallout329

Жыл бұрын

​@@FeyFire I don't see much evidence from the books displayed here for your reasoning for the song other than just guess work...

@fallout329

Жыл бұрын

I dont see how you can read the books and think that Rhaynery giving child birth is blood magic lol

@fallout329

Жыл бұрын

@@FeyFire and If you read Fire and Blood then you know Hugh Hammer claims Vermithor so your theory doesn't make any sense nor is it plausible for the story to come as this would be a massive change from the source material, one that completely shifts the dynamic of the War to strongly favor The Blacks. This won't happen and this scene does very little to suggest anything other Than daemon awakening Vermithor to get him ready to claim another Rider as Daemon is thinking they will need a dragon that can match Vhagar.

@Jack-zb5fn

Жыл бұрын

its just theory’s and speculation so calm down. If you ACTUALLY read the books you’d know that Jahaerys is not Viserys’ father lol. The Valyrian ancestor theory is just a theory and more likely nonsense. Who is to say that the death of Rhaenyras daughter is not blood magic? GRRM has made it clear that magic is not set in stone it is not easily understood or able to be categorised so you certainly are not in any position to say what magic is or isn’t in ASOIAF. The fact that you continue you make reference to “iF yOu AcCtUaLlY rEaD tHe BoOkS” when it is quite unarguable that she has and your regurgitation of David lightbringers theory video shows you for what you are wiki reader begone and try to ACTUALLY read the books next time…Baelon sends his regards

The baratheons were always traitorsto the Targeryen....

i dont think daemon had control over Vhagar, more like Vhagar was following Laena home