It was Syed Ahmad Khan who presented the theory of the two nations in a theoretical framework. In line with the conclusions drawn from the Urdu-Hindi discussions that started in the mid-19th century, Syed Ahmad Khan expressed that Hindu and Muslims have too different perspectives to live together Savarkar came later.

@amansoni-kx6vn

8 ай бұрын

Absolutely right brother ❤👍🏻

Sir Sayed Ahmed (founder of AMU) given two nation theory at a speech when Savarkar was 5 years of age

@Zarghaam12

2 жыл бұрын

BS!

@cloudless_night

Жыл бұрын

​@@Zarghaam12 sach maanne ki himmat na ho to na aa jaya karo bkwaas krne comments me. Syed ahmed clearly khta tha we are 2 nations.

I wonder why this man is called as an historian, the truth is Savarkar in 1936 or 37 had wrote an article in which he had brought up this idea, but the idea was two nation's within one nation, which meant different set of rules for Hindus and Muslims based on their religious beliefs, this idea was later adopted by Pandit Nehru.And is being rejected by BJP who wants to rectify it and bring in Uniform civil code.

@bharatjodoyatra3608

Жыл бұрын

Haan bhootni ke tmse pooch ke ab upadhiyan di jayen gi Nafrat ki tatti ke 🪳 ho gye ho

Very innocently defended Jinnah. Please read Mr. Ishtiaq Ahmed's book on Jinnah, or u can listen his interviews on U tube. Now I'm sure this man is very good at distorting history .

50 इस्लामी देशों मे से कोई भी सेकुलरवाद की बात नहीं करता फिर मुस्लिम यहां सेक्युलरवाद का राग क्यों अलापते हैं पाकिस्तान जन्नत है उसे अपना मुल्क बनाए

@shoabsaif1086

5 жыл бұрын

हिन्दुस्तान हम मुस्लिमो का था हमारा है aur हमारा रहेगा.... तुम लोगो के लिए भी कई देश हमारे भारत से बने.. नेपाल, बर्मा, भूटान आदि तुम लोग इनमे जाकर क्यू नहीं रहते यहाँ दंगा फसाद करते रहते हो...

महान इतिहासकार इरफान हबीब साहब ...धन्यवाद इमानदारी और बेबाकी से अपनी बातें रखने की ।

@satyamnaam5753

6 жыл бұрын

nasir arafat .. true Hindustani Muslim test .... . ... As Hindustani Muslim you should accept that your ancestors are hindus ... If you don't accept this then your believing that your great grandfather was a rapist from central Asia and your great grandmother was victim .

@positiveali9214

6 жыл бұрын

Satyam Naam My dad and Mom are Hindu but I am a muslim. I converted today morning.

@positiveali9214

6 жыл бұрын

Satyam Naam What's your address?

@satyamnaam5753

6 жыл бұрын

A K ... no need to come out of your home ... start with your family

@positiveali9214

6 жыл бұрын

Satyam Naam now that you don't have a problem with my ancestors, you began to find new reasons to hate. But in Islam, your ancestry doesn't matter, it's you who matters. Tell this to your BJP troll team.

two nation theory kisi ne v di ho nuksan to country aur comman peoples ka hua naa. politicians tub v chutiye the aaj v chutiye hai.

@truthexposed7167

6 жыл бұрын

Rahul Soren bhai abhi bhi hindutva rastra ki baat bol rahay hai wahi group jo savarkar ko hero manta hai

6 жыл бұрын

correct

@Himanshu-hq8og

6 жыл бұрын

Nuksaan sirf hinduo ka hua Muslims Ko to do countries Mili aur humein sickular bullshit

@truthexposed7167

6 жыл бұрын

himanshu rathore bhai muslim ko bhi secular country mili....islamic nahi.... Indian ko bhi secular country mili... Or ek baat agar secular law nahi hotah toh kya hotah??? Manusmriti?? Yani 2000 saal pehlay wala law...jo insaan ko dalit shudra kehkar janwar say bhi battar sulook kartay thay.... Nehru etc nay sahi decision liya secular law ka... Warna abhi tak civil war hi hotay rehti thee... Dalits or uppercaste may

@whoisarifkhan

6 жыл бұрын

Rahul Soren exactly bro. But today world . More chutiyapa is #Janta 👍

Savarkar is to be equally blamed ( if not more) than Jinnah!!!

@avinashmishra7735

6 жыл бұрын

At least get your basic facts right. Hindutva was NOT coined by VD Savarkar in 1923. It was already used by Great Hindi and Bangla scholars like Panchanan Tarkaratna, Chandranath Basu and Harishchandra Bharatendu before Savarkar was even born. BTW, Sawarkar was never that much influencial to deprive Muslims from their rights. So, to quote Sawarkar is just to misguide people so that it can be proved it was a Hindu leader who asked for dividing India first. Before them, it was Syed Ahmad Khan (founder of AMU) who proposes 2 Nation Theory (not exactly the term bcoz the term "Nation state" has come much later in 20th century in Europe although the name Bharat of this sub-continent was very much on the tip of common people but he injected a feeling in Muslims that Hindus and Muslims are 2 different 'koums' and Muslims need to preserve their culture in the Hindu majoritarianism) in the disguise of multiculturalism and differentiated citizenship in late 1880s. Moreover this concept came from Rich Indian Muslim students of Syed's time who went to Europe for learning. Before that, the concept of jaziya tax along with destruction of temples on a large scale was on the basis of Muslim Non-Muslim divide which were forced upon by Islamic invaders. Before that, it was Muhammad himself 1400 years ago who divided Future Muslims and Non-Muslims as 2 different uncompromising things namely 'Qaum Al Musalman' and 'Qaum Al Kafiroon' by proposing the concept of Dar-Al-Islam, Dar-Al-Harb and Dar-Al-Amn. Maulana Shabbir Ahmad Usmani, senior leader of Jinnah's Muslim league and member of Pakistan's constituent assembly- "Two nation theory was not invention of any man. Its origins lie in the Quran. There is only one valid classification of the world. That between Momim and Kafir". Even Iqbal who is often selectively quoted by Indian secularists as the one who gave Lord Rama the title of Imam-e-Hind (although it's derogatory to use the word prophet for Rama bcoz he himself was an Avatar and not messenger of the God by Hindu framework) and wrote "Saare jaha se achha Hindustan humara..mazhub nahi sikhata aapas me beir rakhna" after returning from Saudi Tour, wrote tarana-e-milli bcoz he felt in more love with the idea of Ummah and Caliphate than loyalty towards India's pluaralism. Even Ambedkar after reading Quran and Islamic history of all other civilizatons as well, started to propose that No muslims should be allowed in Hindu India. haha Now let me make it very clear why these Muslims prefer Communist ideologies in India despite being so radically opposing in ideology is because India is Dar-AL-Harb country for Muslims and for Communists their Marxist theory that Minorities can only and only be helped by knocking down majority and keep on dividing them on various fault lines otherwise no way out to ensure Equality and Social Justice in the number game of parliamentary democracy. For debating in details, I am ready. However, let me crack a joke here to lighten the mood: Muslims are like a football team. The radical/terrorist are the strikers. The extremists are midfielders who feed the radicals. The defenders are moderate muslims who create diversions, deflect, defend and save Islam from legitimate criticism and any accusations in the name of sufism. They work as team though they create a perception that the defenders have nothing to do with strikers. The self claimed liberals and peace makers in the disguise of Champions of Secularism, Diversity, Universal Acceptance and Tolerance are like the goalies who jump in when the situations get worse with statements like "Islam is peaceful religion", "An eye for an eye can make the whole world blind", "it's better to be even unilaterally tolerant at the cost of no matter what comes in return otherwise Mutual-Respect would instigate them for even more violence", etc etc etc......

@MM-ue4ol

6 жыл бұрын

Ur information about Muhammad's n Quran was correct but later u gotdistacted

@avinashmishra7735

6 жыл бұрын

You must mention where did I get distracted bro or else you seem to be less informed as of now..haha

@MM-ue4ol

6 жыл бұрын

Avinash Mishra Avinash Mishra where came marx in this,basically it was the so called sanatan dharma which dividend hindu on castes and birth it was this philosophy that created fault lines in majority ie vedic ie Hindu dharma,no other outside person required for this,don't forget what swami vivekanand quoted .The extract is somewhat like--those who thinks that Islam spread in this country only on d edges of swords,shd rethink n rerea.,So we r also responsible for creating rifts and minorities. U r correct about Islam philosophy n dar ul harb, never argued on that but pl understand that savarkar is one of adya person who talked about 2 state theories along with jinha n league.(search u will get proofs)sad to say bt Hindu Mahasabha under leadership of savarkar spent most of d time opposing n hating Gandhi rather than brits after his release.Agreed Savarkar was nt that big and influential to influence Hindus at that time (l know many people will oppose this n will not digest this but it is true ) Bro l agree im less learned n never claimed lm above u, bt lm always ready to learn; but not with d biased eyes of today's propaganda and divisive policies of both Hindus and Muslims and foolish-naive religious beliefs. Thanks

@mukeshchavan3923

4 жыл бұрын

Without knowing fact Abt demand of two nation theory proposed by sir Ahmed Khan in 1888 (www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00islamlinks/txt_sir_sayyid_meerut_18and 88.html) do not comment.

I advice my citizens to please listen to analysis of History of India by Pak Journalist Mr Najam Sethi. You will find so many intensional mistakes in talks of Habib..

sach bat in logoko hazam nahi hogi

@karthikeyanchidambaram6560

3 жыл бұрын

Some say Two nation theory was first proposed in a way by Lala Hardayal, some say Chaudhary Rahmati Ali, some credit Mohammed Iqbal (Allama). Whoever proposed Two nation theory, what is the point behind repeating all this ? It was Jinnah who saw it implemented.

Thanks for your sensinarity.

It is a fact that mohamad Ali Jinah was ambitious to become a Prime Minister of India after independence while he was in Congress. The RSS was the one who was hell bent on having a pure Hindu Rashtra. To have a pure Hindu Rashtra, the non Hindus were to be thrown out of India. The Jan Sangh, original version of the BJP and an offshoot of the RSS, professed and began their activities on communal lines. Bhishm Sahani has elaborated the whole episode in his book, TV serial and the movie 'TAMS'. Jinah distanced himself from the Congress whe he realised that the Congress was nothing else but a Brahmin party where others had no space. He went to Pakistan by compulsion and not by choice.

@jagdeepsandhu9659

3 жыл бұрын

True, spoken like a statesman.

@karthikeyanchidambaram6560

3 жыл бұрын

Congress a Brahmin party ? What was the proportion of Brahmins ? In the same Tamas we see a Moulvi telling Congress leaders who were cleaning the gutters don't do all this in our area. (Some Congress workers blaming Gandhi for compelling them to clean gutters). It was not throw out, but make them less privileged (whatever it meant, it impossible in undivided India at least). It came much later from Golwalkar in the early 1940s, when the territories of Pakistan had been already planned by Chaudhary Rahmat Ali and Allama Iqbal.

@bhupindersinghkanwar5681

3 жыл бұрын

In democracy every exert pressure to earn more money wealth..

@billa4095

3 жыл бұрын

Gandhi offered him prime minister ship but he knew that he doesn't have support

@hinduculturecivilization1483

2 жыл бұрын

ये तो केवल हिंदी +उर्दू बोल रहा है। और एंटी हिन्दू propegenda फैला रहा है। अगर वो बात कही तो जिन्ना ने तो अलग हीं कर दिया इसलिए जिन्ना के फोटो पर तो पेशाब कर देना चाहिए ना कि इज्जत लूटना चाहिए. 😁 ये जो interview ले रहा है वो भी पैसा खाया है इस बूढे से.... 😂😂😂

Idea of Muslim state in South Asia was first introduced by Allama Iqbal.... Then Chowdhary rehemat Ali....then At last in Lahore resolution by Jinnah.

@cloudless_night

Жыл бұрын

Syed ahmed se start hua. Correct your information.

*Maybe Prof Irfan Habib need to read more about SIr Syed Ahmed & his views on two nation theory in late 1800s*

Iqbal said this: "A separate federation of Muslim Provinces, reformed on the lines I have suggested above, is the only course by which we can secure a peaceful India and save Muslims from the domination of Non-Muslims. Why should not the Muslims of North-West India and Bengal be considered as nations entitled to self-determination just as other nations in India and outside India are."

Irfan Habib is a great personality....

@sushilchoudhary875

6 жыл бұрын

shudhanshu shekhar Don't fall into the trap of leftist propaganda. Two nations theory is given by founder of AMU Sir Syed khan Read about it

Dear NewsClickin, I'm not very fluent in Hindi and this conversation is very difficult for me to understand. I am really interested in understanding what the Professor has to say. I would really appreciate if you could add English subtitles to it, of if there is a translated transcript available, I request you to kindly provide me the link. Thank you in advance.

क्या कोई इतिहासकार यह बताने की कृपा करेगा कि मुस्लिम लीग पहिले बनी या हिन्दू महासभा ? आल इंडिया मुस्लिम लीग बनी १९०६ में और हिन्दू महासभा अस्तित्व में आयी १९१५ में, अब कृपया यह स्पष्ट करें कि समाज को बाँटने की पहल किसने की ? जिन्ना के द्वारा वीर सावरकर से पूछे जाने पर कि"आपने हिन्दू महासभा ज्वाइन कर ली ? प्रत्युत्तर में सावरकर ने पूछा कि क्या आप मुस्लिम लीग छोड़ रहे हैं ? जिन्ना चुप रह गए | स्पष्ट है कि इस देश में मुसलमान तो संगठित हो सकते हैं पर हिन्दुओं के ऐसा करने पर सांप्रदायिक होने का दोष लगता है | सनातन धर्म ही सह-अस्तित्व पर आधारित है, जबकि इस्लाम इसकी इजाज़त नहीं देता | सावरकर और सुभाषचंद्र बोस के विरुद्ध दुष्प्रचार और षड़यंत्र के पीछे कांग्रेस के शीर्ष नेतृत्व का भय था जिसपर फिर कभी .....|

@attemptiasacademy7871

5 жыл бұрын

Hindu mahasabha 1875 m bani

@alisony3608

5 жыл бұрын

g pehle hindumahsaba bani apni knowledge

@asfaquehussain7146

5 жыл бұрын

HINDU Mhasabha hi JINNAH k sath mil kr Bengal me govt. Bnaya tha yaad h

@JAVEDKHAN-pn1ur

5 жыл бұрын

Kis sanatan ki bat kr rhe aap .jisne insano ko sudra bna kr janwaro se bhi bdtr sluk kia.aap ashastitya ki bat Mt kro

@asifbhaivahora8102

4 жыл бұрын

All India Muslim League was in line with Congress as a party but RSS remained just a dueling fire to split nations through inciting speeches and creating riots. Being in minority, Muslim League Jinna lost patience and made a historical blunder. However, this could have been avoided if there had not been extreme response from Hindu Mahasabha or some solid assurance and solution from Congress. Religion and Politics are two different things. When people mid them, they would destroy any pluralistic society.

Love you sir very good

Two nation theory was kept in 1920

@trifleodd

4 жыл бұрын

Irfan chutiya bana raha hai, aur yahaan par sab chutiya ban kar khush ho rahe hain.

Sachchai ko koi janna nehi chahta hay is liye aj a hal hay sukriya sir sach natane ke liye

Awesome Sir

#Shukriya Habib Sahab for such A deep & Authentic Knowledge. 🙏👍

@Q_QQ_Q

6 жыл бұрын

why is there coincidence that all extremists happen to be brahmins ? So should they be called Brahmin extremists or hindu extremists ?

Unite, Speak up against Injustice, Unemployment, rights. Save Democracy Save Constitution. Live for Humanity Help needy. Jai Bharat Jai Hind Jai Jawan Jai Kisan 🙏❤️❤️Thankyou very much for showing on ground reality of Governance. Request government to build more Hospitals for better Health System. 🙏

@sampar0301

2 жыл бұрын

Ask waff board to donate all jammen to make hospital which is free ready??

Thanks sir 👍👍👍👍

Great historian of India

*Vote for united india* Savarkar nay hindutva rastra ki mangki....1940s may Jinnah nay muslim secular rastra banliya... Nehru nay hindu secular rastra banaliya.... Or savarkar Ko mila kuch nahi....or free may savarkar nay desk kay tukday karwa diya..... Hindutva rastra ki mang karogay toh sikh bhi sikh secular rastra bana layga jaisay planning horahi hai...2020 punjab referendum.. Dalit bhi dali secular rastra christian bhi christian state etc etc.... Isliea UNITED INDIA banao hindutva rastra ki mang karnay walay ko harao... Agar india ko united rakhna hai toh.... 60 saal pehlay jo galti ki Abb mat karo.. Vote for UNITED INDIA...

Sir you are 💯% correct

फिर दोनो देश को आपस में मिलवा दीजिए। हिंदुस्तान तो तैयार है, अपने प्रिय पाकिस्तान को तैयार कीजिए,,कम्युनिस्टों

chalo jo hua so hua ab jitna bacha he uske to tukde na karo

@cr-bz8zs

4 жыл бұрын

Haan bhaii agr is br galti hue To apne aane wali pidhi ko bohot bachtana padega....

@bashirmulla9417

3 жыл бұрын

Aap ke Vichar bahut badhiya hai . Ayesi hi Soch har ek Bhartiye ki honi Chahiye. Hum sab ek hi Bharat Maa ki santan hai . Hame miljulkar Bharat ko Duniya Ka. No.1 Desh banana hai. Jahan Dal Dal par Soneki Chidiya Karti hai Basera ,. Wo Bharat Desh hai Mera ...

Even if he did, say if Savarkar first proposed bifurcation of India, he didn't had much political clout to influence such a humongous decision of partion of India. Even though Mr Tanvir is left wing Historian, should not shy away from calling spade a spade. Muslim League by and large are responsible for creation of Pakistan. It was poet Iqbal who butteresed the idea and AMU think tank was behind it. Mahatma opposed, but deep down the seeds he sowed in form of Khilafat movement were coming to frution. Congress leaders had no option but to oblige and sway away from Cabinet mission plan.

Jinnane deshki aazadime hissliya tha magar rss us time kahathi.unhone angrejki.baju li thi.

@bashirmulla9417

3 жыл бұрын

RSS wale Angrejo ki dalali Kar rahe the. Angrejo se pagar, / Pension lete the . Azadi ki ladai me RSS Ka koyee yogdan nahi tha..... Baki Sare Hindu, Muslim, Sikh, Isaai, ekjut hokar Bharat ki Aazadi ki ladai lad rahe the. Aur Desh ke liye aapni kurbani dete rahe.. Lakho Salam un Deshbhakt Janta, aur Navjawan, aur Bujurg ( oldage people ) ko . Pranaam hai Bharat Maa ke un bahaddur Suputron ko.. JAI BHARAT . MERA BHARAT MAHAN.

@hindibiography2404

3 жыл бұрын

@@bashirmulla9417 tu bhi tha na tabhi to bata rha hai rss ke bare me

What a great scholar! Always a delight to listen to Dr Habib... very intellectually stimulating. 🙏🏻

@avinashmishra7735

6 жыл бұрын

Hindutva was NOT coined by VD Savarkar in 1923. It was already used by Great Hindi and Bangla scholars like Panchanan Tarkaratna, Chandranath Basu and Harishchandra Bharatendu before Savarkar was even born. BTW, Sawarkar was never that much influencial to deprive Muslims from their rights. So, to quote Sawarkar is just to misguided people so that it can be proved it was a Hindu leader who asked for dividing India first. Before them, it was Syed Ahmad Khan (founder of AMU) who proposes 2 Nation Theory (not exactly the term bcoz the term "Nation state" has come much later in 20th century in Europe although the name Bharat of this sub-continent was very much on the tip of common people but he injected a feeling in Muslims that Hindus and Muslims are 2 different 'koums' and Muslims need to preserve their culture in the Hindu majoritarianism) in the disguise of multiculturalism and differentiated citizenship in late 1880s. Moreover this concept came from Rich Indian Muslim students of Syed's time who went to Europe for learning. Before that, the concept of jaziya tax along with destruction of temples on a large scale was on the basis of Muslim Non-Muslim divide which were forced upon by Islamic invaders. Before that, it was Muhammad himself 1400 years ago who divided Future Muslims and Non-Muslims as 2 different uncompromising things namely 'Qaum Al Musalman' and 'Qaum Al Kafiroon' by proposing the concept of Dar-Al-Islam, Dar-Al-Harb and Dar-Al-Amn. Maulana Shabbir Ahmad Usmani, senior leader of Jinnah's Muslim league and member of Pakistan's constituent assembly- "Two nation theory was not invention of any man. Its origins lie in the Quran. There is only one valid classification of the world. That between Momim and Kafir". Even Iqbal who is often selectively quoted by Indian secularists as the one who gave Lord Rama the title of Imam-e-Hind (although it's derogatory to use the word prophet for Rama bcoz he himself was an Avatar and not messenger of the God by Hindu framework) and wrote "Saare jaha se achha Hindustan humara..mazhub nahi sikhata aapas me beir rakhna" after returning from Saudi Tour, wrote tarana-e-milli bcoz he felt in more love with the idea of Ummah and Caliphate than loyalty towards India's pluaralism. Even Ambedkar after reading Quran and Islamic history of all other civilizatons as well, started to propose that No muslims should be allowed in Hindu India. haha Now let me make it very clear why these Muslims prefer Communist ideologies in India despite being so radically opposing in ideology is because India is Dar-AL-Harb country for Muslims and for Communists their Marxist theory that Minorities can only and only be helped by knocking down majority and keep on dividing them on various fault lines otherwise no way out to ensure Equality and Social Justice in the number game of parliamentary democracy. For debating in details, I am ready. However, let me crack a joke here to lighten the mood: Muslims are like a football team. The radical/terrorist are the strikers. The extremists are midfielders who feed the radicals. The defenders are moderate muslims who create diversions, deflect, defend and save Islam from legitimate criticism and any accusations in the name of sufism. They work as team though they create a perception that the defenders have nothing to do with strikers. The self claimed liberals and peace makers in the disguise of Champions of Secularism, Diversity, Universal Acceptance and Tolerance are like the goalies who jump in when the situations get worse with statements like "Islam is peaceful religion", "An eye for an eye can make the whole world blind", "it's better to be even unilaterally tolerant at the cost of no matter what comes in return otherwise Mutual-Respect would instigate them for even more violence", etc etc etc......

@hinduculturecivilization1483

2 жыл бұрын

ये तो केवल हिंदी +उर्दू बोल रहा है। और एंटी हिन्दू propegenda फैला रहा है। अगर वो बात कही तो जिन्ना ने तो अलग हीं कर दिया इसलिए जिन्ना के फोटो पर तो पेशाब कर देना चाहिए ना कि इज्जत लूटना चाहिए. 😁 ये जो interview ले रहा है वो भी पैसा खाया है इस बूढे से.... 😂😂😂

@hinduculturecivilization1483

2 жыл бұрын

ये habibi Pagla गया है

Irfan Habib ek imandar aur sacche janralist hai

सावरकर असीम देशभक्त थे l उन्होंने अपना सारा जीवन भारत को समर्पित किया था l

Excellent guru

I am not pro RSS but it is ridiculous to blame them for partition. Whatever Golwalkar or Savarkar might have said, they were marginal figures at that time, not that important. The main Hindu party was the Congress which admittedly tried but failed at attracting Muslim mass support. I had a good opinion of Prof Habib’s scholarship even if he is a communist, before this interview but he lost all credibility based on what I just heard him say

इरफ़ान हबीब जैसे महान इतिहासकार की ज़रूरत सबसे ज़्यादा हमारे देश के प्रधानमंत्री को है, जो हर जनसभा में जनता के सामने झूठा या ग़लत इतिहास पेश करते हैं !!! हमें मालूम है मोदी जी आपका वो interview राजीव शुक्ला के साथ, जिसमें आपने ख़ुद स्वीकार किया था कि आपने 10वीं तक की पढ़ाई की है इससे हम आपके इतिहास ज्ञान का अनुमान आसानी से लगा सकते हैं !!!

@asj9054

4 жыл бұрын

Hahaha jahil is desh ko chala rha hai

India is great

Savarkar submitted his next mercy petition on 14 November 1913, and presented it personally to the Home Member of the Governor General's council, Sir Reginald Craddock.[27] In his letter, asking for forgiveness, he described himself as a "prodigal son" longing to return to the "parental doors of the government". He wrote that his release from the jail will recast the faith of many Indians in the British rule. Also, he said "Moreover, my conversion to the constitutional line would bring back all those misled young men in India and abroad who were once looking up to me as their guide. I am ready to serve the government in any capacity they like, for as my conversion is conscientious so I hope my future conduct would be. By keeping me in jail, nothing can be got in comparison to what would be otherwise."[28]

@mukeshchavan3923

4 жыл бұрын

Reginald cradock on clemency of savarkars Craddock, in his report after meeting Savarkar, stated that he was defiant in the interview and “cannot be said to express any regret or repentance” for his revolutionary acts.and it is dangerous to give him any relief.

Aap ki baat durust hai

also it was the same savarkar who gave the idea of hindutva in his books. He tried to replace the all accepting character of hindu dharma, therefore he contaminated Hinduism by inserting insulting ideals of Hindutva and hindu rashtra.True Hindus will never support any such act. Jinnah is no saint either, it was the likes of Savarkar, Hedgewar, Golwalkar, jinnah and muslim league that were responsible for partition and deaths.

@sushilchoudhary875

6 жыл бұрын

ravindra bhandari Don't fall into the trap of leftist propaganda. Two nations theory is given by founder of AMU Sir Syed khan Read about it

@Q_QQ_Q

6 жыл бұрын

why is there coincidence that all extremists happen to be brahmins ? So should they be called Brahmin extremists or hindu extremists ?

@anybody9059

6 жыл бұрын

IPL 2018 Official ...Strictly speaking Fundmentalist or Extremist are those term which r not proper term to describe any stray violent advocate hapoened tobe from Hindo or Barahmin fold ..

@avinashawasthi8952

6 жыл бұрын

IPL 2018 Official Bismil,Azad, Sooryasen were extremist and Brahmin too.......So Call them Brahman extremist.

@anybody9059

6 жыл бұрын

bg s ..Its mistake my freind...Savarkar was not for Two Nation Theory actualy ....Its "Quam"and Ummah concept Surah 49 of Qoran e Majid s Interpretation by Above mentioned Leaders....savarkar was Atheist .He was revolutionary and socialist activity circle before he advocted Hindutva...which can Enfold moslem and christian If they shun NonIndian cultures Slavery and Indian by heart ......His role in Jinnah s Two nation was sort equating by realistic politics

I do not dispute your claims but please provide a link or documents so that everyone can see the facts for themselves

@bittertruth007

6 жыл бұрын

U and me need to put reference not he....he himself is the reference................

@siddharthb2633

6 жыл бұрын

Irfan Habib is a legend.. a gem.. He is your source.. But your claim is reasonable and just.

@l4y3zY

6 жыл бұрын

Savarkar mentioned it in his essay ‘Hindutva’ in 1923. It is available online. Help yourself

@max_paynetothemax9499

6 жыл бұрын

l4y3zY thank you

@Q_QQ_Q

6 жыл бұрын

why is there coincidence that all extremists happen to be brahmins ? So should they be called Brahmin extremists or hindu extremists ?

Okkay this chamaloeon distorian again obfuscating the fact that it was syed Ahmed khan in his speech in 1866 in meerut gave the framework of hindu and muslims being so distinct that they are two nationalities living in same land!!. It was not savarkar or golwolkar its the muslim themselves who felt that how can they be ruled by Hindus in independent India which led to this bloody partition. Even now they have this superiority complex where they claim " 800 sal hukumut ki hai akhir kaar humne hinduon ke upper ".

I wanted to say that it was a tactics to apologize for Savarkar to get out of Andaman Jail (Kala Pani) as it is called. Initially Savarkar too had a Left leaning ideology. He had high regards for Bhagat Singh the great revolutionary and a communist leader. Savarkar was never afraid of the British and therefore was the only one to oppose when the youth Congress in London tried to pass a resolution condemning great revolutionary Madanlal Dhingra and was beaten up for that. When arrested by Britishers for sedition, Savarkar leapt from the Ship to swim all the way to Marseille which not only proves his courage and fitness, but also his ability to challenge a super power like Britain.

Irfan Habib ji is a great Historian.

Great thinker accadmission and

very good view.

@sushilchoudhary875

6 жыл бұрын

santosh maurya Don't fall into the trap of leftist propaganda. Two nations theory is given by founder of AMU Sir Syed khan Read about it

Prof Sahab Ko. Sir Saiyad Ahamed khan ka merath aur Lucknow me 1880 ke dasak me Diya Gaya Bhasan Bhi padhana chahiye.. two nation theory ke bare me inki jankari me ijafa Ho jayesh.. sukiya

Please increase AUDIO VOLUME it's not audible

@satyamnaam5753

6 жыл бұрын

Mohammad Faizullah Hussaini ... true Hindustani Muslim test ...... As Hindustani Muslim you should accept that your ancestors are hindus ... If you don't accept this then your believing that your great grandfather was a rapist from central Asia and your great grandmother was victim .

@struth4873

6 жыл бұрын

Satyam Naam any muslim's ancestor can be anyone! Even your own blood can be Muslim and even you can become Muslim. People are always reverting to Islam as soon as they study and compare and question and think about Islam. So what difference does it make who one's ancestors were! Even Abraham's, Peace be upon him, father was a pagan/idolator but Abraham heart was Muslim and was a Muslim. Muhammad's, Peace be upon him, had family members who were pagans too. So big deal what the past is. People always are reverting to Islam therefore will have ancestors who were kafir or not Muslims!

Sir, according to u Chaudhary Rahmat Ali was raised voice from Cambridge whom u said "Nobody take him serious" but it stated & continued till Iqbal, Jinna & resulted in seperation where Savarkar & Golvalkar wereI guess confronted only isn't it?

Great ❤❤❤

Ye h en logo ki sachhai....dekho or samjho..

@mukeshchavan3923

4 жыл бұрын

www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00islamlinks/txt_sir_sayyid_meerut_1888.html

With two nation theory Muslim got Pakistan , Hindu got Hindustan and what about the Sikhs ?? . They had to leave their Home and farms in Pakistan and cane to the new country which always call them Gaddars !!! What a tragedy .The people who fought with these British the most , instead of getting the most respect they are treated as the foreigners in their own home .

100 % UR RIGHT BROTHER

Well all say that saverkar first said about 2 nation theory, but it was Jinnha who executed it...and that's the fact. Anyways can I get to see the document where saverkar said about two nation theory or is it just a hypothesis.

@sushilchoudhary875

6 жыл бұрын

a vm Don't fall into the trap of leftist propaganda. Two nations theory is given by founder of AMU Sir Syed khan Read about it

@reliancejio1438

6 жыл бұрын

Sushil....Bjp It cell chamcha

@MM-ue4ol

6 жыл бұрын

U will get it in many history books,old journals,papers.. But read true history books by least unbiased writers,and not d roadside propaganda books.

Sir, remember Syed Ahmed Khan founder of Aligarh muslim college,then remember Allama Iqbal and you will be on the right track. Partition was good for both hindus and muslims.The only problem which arose in 1947 was that majority of indian muslims outside Pakistan region did not migrate to Pakistan and are living in india in a limbo; neither here nor there.

Mohdudi ko koi seriously nahi leta tha,chaudhary rahamat sli ko koi seriously nahi liya lekin savarkar ko seriously liya wah...sir sawarkar 11 sal kala pani me rahe Muslim league ka ek bhi bnda bata do 1 minute bhi jail me raha...

Right

Congratulations team newsclick for crossing 50k subscriber mark...

Further, it is very clear that Jinnah throughout the negotiation process behaved like a stooge of the British, everyone knows that partition was always a British plan and Jinnah followed the orders of the British through and through. It's said that Jinnah demanded some concession for the Muslim to avoid partition and even Mahatma Gandhi was ready to negotiate the same Jinnah about the same both Pandit Nehru and Sardar Patel thought that Jinnah's demands would make Hindus second grade citizens in their own land and therefore were provoked to become signatories to the partition. Was it that Jinnah was deliberately doing so, as per instructions of his British masters there is every reason to believe the same. To be continued in next post.

@Q_QQ_Q

6 жыл бұрын

why is there coincidence that all extremists happen to be brahmins ? So should they be called Brahmin extremists or hindu extremists ?

@makaranddange6727

6 жыл бұрын

IPL 2018 Official May be because they had a superior complex.

@truthexposed7167

6 жыл бұрын

Makarand Dange savarkar was also a British agent he started Hindu maha sabah during British ruled.... just imagine British censor everything n they allowed Hindutva group ???? British created Hindutva group to maligned the peaceful hindu people n still hindutva group funded by mossad.... British divided the country into two...n savarkar n jinnah helped british.....

@truthexposed7167

6 жыл бұрын

IPL 2018 Official brother they r brahmin extremists... even today rss runs by brahmin.... N brahmin votes for bjp only....its a fact.... Brahmin ruled by manusmriti.... N They wanted they law of manusmriti...to be rule again... So they started the campaign once again after 70 years.... That campaign called as "hindutva rastra" This same slogan divided the country

@makaranddange6727

6 жыл бұрын

Truth Exposed Hindu Mahasabha was formed to challenge the Muslim League. I agree with the fact that Savarkar was a supporter two nation theory. But the Hindu Mahasabha was destroyed in the 1937 elections and therefore had no role to in negotiations of partition, therefore it was Jinnah himself who played the significant role in the partition process and cannot be absolved from it.

Jin logo ne desh ko Azad karane me yogdaan Diya unki izzat kro khub ... differences to kabhi khatam nhi honge lekin ab desh aazaad ho chuka h or ab hame aage bdna chahiye .....or Jo deshwasiyo ko Hindu Muslim me baate use do jute markar bhagao Chahe BJP y Congress koi bhi ho

@deepakindianboy8867

6 жыл бұрын

Arhan khan Salute man.

@deepakindianboy8867

6 жыл бұрын

Arhan khan Agar aise soch sab ki ho jaye toh samjho bjp almost haar gayi.

DIRECT ACTION PLAN IN KOLKATA KISNE KIYA THA MR JINNAH OR VEER SARVARKAR

@aftabansari2010able

4 жыл бұрын

वह चूतिये वह

@aftabansari2010able

3 жыл бұрын

@@pallavtiwarilav8581 आ गया पवार का आंड मोदी

@nitesh192

Жыл бұрын

Bhai hindu mahasabha ajadi ke time me desh ko hindu rashtra banana chahta tha ar kafi Ada huwa tha is bat p .jinnah kafi secular tha ar ek secular desh chahta tha pr jab usne dekha ki ye hindu extremist log kbhi bhi muslimo ko unka haq ni milega to usne man bana liya ki muslimo ke liye ek alag desh banayenge .asli harami hindu mahasabha h .ek inclusive secular desh banjata to desh ke tukde ni hote ..rss ko banaya hi gaya h ki phir se manusmriti bka rule laya Jaye .ajadi ke time unke jagah congress jo ki liberal the unhe Mila jo aj ka bharat h .jahan sab khusi khusi reh sake . manusmriti bm 85 percent logon ko accept ni hoga

@nitesh192

Жыл бұрын

Bhai jake Jammu massacre bhi pad lo jake .rss ka ektarfa itihas mat jano

The Communist are free to make Jinnah a hero but don't make villians of other revolutionaries just to shield him.

@makaranddange6727

6 жыл бұрын

Over Thinker Well if Mr.Habib is not a communist my bad and I have no problems saying so. And at the same time I don't hold anything against the Communist either. But, when it comes to Jinnah there is every reason to believe that he is instrumental in the partition, its true taali ek haat se nahi bajati, Jinnah and British together executed the plan the British had drawn long back. After 1857 freedom struggle they implemented the policy of divide and rule.

Thank sir for Ur nice and absolutely factful knowledge.

@mukeshchavan3923

4 жыл бұрын

What Abt this www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00islamlinks/txt_sir_sayyid_meerut_1888.html

वेद में कहीं भी हिन्दू शब्द नहीं है।हिन्दू शब्द के प्रति पूर्वाग्रह क्यों है, यह अवश्य हमारे लिए जिज्ञासा और विचार का विषय है।

@BS-iw7zx

3 жыл бұрын

Hindu shabd jyada purana nah hai ye shabd lagabhag 150-200 saal pahle Aya hai esliye hame hamare shastron me nahi milta hai

Jinnha's Muslim league which was formed in 1906 and Hindu mahasabha of savarkar were rulling Bengal and Sindh govt jointly in 1942 when all other State/prant govt resigned from the govt Savarkar mentioned two nation theory in 1920 in his book Hindu and defined what is hindutva and who will called Hindu Also in 1935 there was a official resolution of two nation theory in the national conference of the Hindu mahasabha by savarkar Savarkar and jinnah were of the same opinion about two nation Popular Muslim leader from lohore was also murdered who was against the two nation theory

Jo ho gaya so ho gaya, hamare pass time machine nahi hai ke past me jakar kuchh badal de, ab hame iski jarurat bhi nahi, chahiye ki abhi hum dilo ki nafrato ko door kar apne desh ke liye aman, insaniyat aur imaandari se jiye...

Two nation theory was first propounded by Sayyad Ahmed much before savkarkar was born.

But he never talked about dividing India.....Its just half of the fact Sir which u r quoting.

Very great historian

@mukeshchavan3923

4 жыл бұрын

www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00islamlinks/txt_sir_sayyid_meerut_1888.html

Sir your great

Irfan habib sahab sabse pahle 2 rastra ki aat sir syed ahmed khan ne ki thi jo asraf musalman the jinke baar mai baat karne ki aapki himmat nahi hai thanku

Save India Save Constitution Save Democracy Save Humanity Unsubscribe Godi media channels Jio at home Ban Farm laws NRC CAA EVM RSS Bajrang Dal VHP Hindu Vahini Mahasabha United against Hate

Recording karte samay audio ki quality ka bhi dhyan rakhna bahot zaroori hai.

2:20 par Irfan sahab ne by mistake Lucknow pact ke sandarbh mein 2016 kaha hai, jabki ye 1916 samjha jaey.

@veryrarecoinhusssain4373

3 жыл бұрын

1916 he bola hai

We hindu sikh get freedom from muslims angrazo na koi temple nhi toda na talwar sa dhram badla muslim have no faith in harmoney

Aaj aap ki desh ko jarurat hai. Our aam insan ki pahchan kai kho gai hai.

Ye vo shaks hn jink bareme kaha jata he agr dunya ki Puri history Mita di jaye to ye Puri history bethkr likhdenge bhakto Ko chahye k inhe ghor se sune or sach Ko smje

Jinnah never got along with anybody throughout his life. Later on he was marginalized even in Pakistan. His old friend the well respected Justice Chagla cut off his relationship with Jinnah after Jinnah player a pivotal role in partition of India. On the other hand the great Communist leader M.N.Roy remained Savarkar's friend till his death, even though both of them had their differences. On a side note Savarkar's statue is installed in India House in London and was unveiled by Lord Fenner Brockway. The British sure know how to respect a revolutionary even if he is their enemy.

If you want to blame Savarkar for anything you blame him for the Gandhi murder. He was barely acquitted during his trial. The standard for criminal conviction is “beyond reasonable doubt” (99 percent chance), not preponderance of probabilities (greater than 50 percent chance) which is how most of us take routine decisions

Two nation theory in 1867 sar saiyad ahmd , 1930 Muhammad Iqbal and Chaudhary Rahmat Ali and Mohammed Ali Jinnah Ki thi.

nice

I am Buddhist from nalanda bihar. ...can irfan habib tell me why nalanda university was burned down by khiljis. .....why Buddhist were killed. ...

हम लोगो को रहमत अली पढाया जाता रहा कांग्रेस सरकार से लेकर अब तक

Hehehe I can prove him wrong any day. Sir sayyad ki 1888 ki Meerut wali speech search karo usme paragraph 7 dekh lena pata chal jayega two nation theory kisne di thi. Chutia mt banao chacha sb log anpadh nhi h🤣🤣🤣

jinnah ke saari ache bate to step by step batate h. But DIRECT ACTION DAY ke baat n karte.

@shoaebkhan8193

4 жыл бұрын

Aap inse Accha history no jante medical me topper h India me

Mullah saley Habib distorting facts, did rss & hindu maha sabha were in power how did they divided country, Congress was in power & controlling country. Even if rss & hindu maha sabha wanted why Congress supported dividing nation.

two nation foundation was given on the day when Muslim league founded in DHAKA

😔

Two nation theory ws proposed by mohmmad iqbal who died in 1938 batwara hua bahot achha hua bahotsare dange jo hote. Bharat itna aage kabhi nahi jata

@ashishrexaudition1902

5 жыл бұрын

Bhai too phir nehru aur Gandhi ko batware ke liye blame Kyu karte ho? Agar mante ho sahi hua thaaa

Wow Jinnah sahab...

Babul Supriyo said. A educated man more dangerous than anyone else who spreads lies

Every state in India has a substantial Muslim population whose culture, language, food etc. the lot belongs to the community/place they live in. To expect them to have migrated to Pakistan is ridiculous. They would never fit in with the Sindhis & Punjabi’s of Pakistan. Even the Muhajirs(UP & MP Muslims)have had it difficult in Pakistan. Furthermore why should they loose their culture & language. Nehru, Jinnah etc never thought about this. Gandhi never wanted a breakaway Pakistan though. Muslims in India feel to be betrayed by the Muslims in Pakistan they would have more power/voice/numbers in undivided India.

great man on great talk about India Ltd

Whatever Jinnah had visioned.... but the truth is that Indian Muslims never followed him. Staying back even after partition is the biggest proof. As far as removal of Jinnah's portrait Indian Muslims have no objection at all. But if we opt to clean our country from all anti-nationals then first we need to remove all memories of killer of the father of nation, the founder of Jan Sangh who ran govt. of Bengal with Jinnah and Muslim league and all perpetrators who apologized to Britishers and conspired against nation.

why is there coincidence that all extremists happen to be brahmins ? So should they be called Brahmin extremists or hindu extremists ?

Irfan Habib sahi bolrahiha he is great historian

Sir Sayed Ahmed khan phir tumhara chahcha tha kya

Explore Jinnah a little bit further, we respect him for fighting as a lawyer of Lokmanya Tilak as a lawyer he left no stone unturned. We also know him as a person who did mind eating swine meat contradictory to religions beliefs. But, look at the other part, he betrayed our nation by demanding partition. After partition was declared he hardly did anything to stop the genocide of people while, Mahatma Gandhi put his life on the line to restore peace in the region. After that Jinnah and Liyakat Ali invented a plan to annex Kashmir and were conspiring to create trouble for whole of India. And when beaten back attacked and annexed Baluchistan. The same Baluchistan which had paid Jinnah by weighing in gold for successfully fighting the case of their independence. Weighing Jinnah in gold wasn't enough for Baluchistan from stopping a greedy Jinnah from attacking and backstabbing them and pushing them into slavery and bondage. To be continued in next post.

@makaranddange6727

6 жыл бұрын

Over Thinker I don't mean to offend anybody. I am exploring just a bit of truth. Happy that you agree on this one. Difference of opinion is also welcomed. Thank You.

@Q_QQ_Q

6 жыл бұрын

why is there coincidence that all extremists happen to be brahmins ? So should they be called Brahmin extremists or hindu extremists ?

@gopalyadav5612

5 жыл бұрын

+Awais Qadir Suaar ki aulad. Halala kipaidaise.