1st Outdoor Flight. Marking the start of our Outdoor Flight Campaign. Follow us to stay updated on our next moves.
Жүктеу.....
Пікірлер: 287
@beginnereasyАй бұрын
I think the propeller idea is cool and it looks safer than swinging a giant sword around
@model101t8007 ай бұрын
Finally, somebody has waken up, been playing with Flettner and cycle rotors in rc years ago, this is the future for many things, like wind turbines
@crunchybones2528
2 ай бұрын
wind turbines are actual trash
@TimothyKirkby7 ай бұрын
This is awesome! Can't wait to see how this will develop into the future
@Dntdgxj9 ай бұрын
This is an interesting concept for flying drones. How noisy this solution is comparing to traditional propellers?
@pre38
4 ай бұрын
Picture your household vacuum on the highest setting with the hood off, times 4
@viduraherath4008
3 ай бұрын
Honestly with the purpouse of use on transport that uses traditional propellers, there's no real need to make them quieter. Theres a reason that no manned aircraft has made good use of toroidal propellers or these. Also it means that its limited to being used by drones since it faces perpendicularly to the flow of air so it cannot be used on a 'forward travelling' aircraft like a plane.
@Wolverine1228d7 ай бұрын
Totally bad a$$! Keep up the great work gentlemen, can't wait to see the next step in your design evolution.
@bluepandaman11 ай бұрын
Very exciting! This is the first thing I've seen that actually looks and feels like a flying car. Awesome.
@graffiti4christ956
9 ай бұрын
Do you live under a rock? Haha 😄 there is a far better that already has approval and actually drives.
@paranaenselol
2 ай бұрын
@@graffiti4christ956 he said it looks like a flying car, thos other ones are just upscaled quadcopters, this one with the diferent propeller look like wheels
@beginnereasy
Ай бұрын
This inspired me as well
@Gene_Zoku11 ай бұрын
Just amazing!
@HughMcBrideDonegalFlyer11 ай бұрын
well done. exciting times.
@user-ju6gx5bc2m11 ай бұрын
All the best for your future testing. get this reality as soon as possible . I like to see with human carrier model .😊
@user-qv6bx6ir9d11 ай бұрын
Smooth landing !
@brainiac103 ай бұрын
Wow. So cool. Great work!
@FS.DJParty7 ай бұрын
Kinda reminds me of the aricraft in the opening scene of Terminator. CycloTech... SkyNet Very Interesting concept and kudos for making it work!
25 күн бұрын
The first flying lawnmower looks great 🎉
10 ай бұрын
Cool. Moving around in 3D like in "The Fifth Element" is near.
@epaminon6196
9 ай бұрын
"near", as in: "this century.
@WorivpuqloDMogh
7 ай бұрын
@@epaminon6196give it 25 years or so Back in the 1970s they said the same about computers
@DJ-Illuminate6 ай бұрын
Could the rotors act as wheels on the ground if rubber was added or if the blade structure was 3D printed similar to the new type of wheels that don't require tubes?
@juliansjames11 ай бұрын
Well done! Great work.
@Mil-bt5zd9 ай бұрын
when you fold up the prop, could you turn the cyclorotor like a tire so that it can run on the road as well?
@realkstattoos2 ай бұрын
Earned my sub cant wait to see the development
@iandaniel16017 ай бұрын
That’s really awesome team!
@loteknomad50329 ай бұрын
Fascinating. Had a question while I was watching - What emergency option would pilots of this kind of aircraft have during loss of power? Without wings in a conventional sense, I don't imagine gliding is possible. Are cyclo-rotors capable of some form of autorotation that would give them unpowered descent capabilities akin to a helicopter? If not, what would the general plan be for operators in the event that the motors failed? Thanks!
@salnikovevgeny
9 ай бұрын
I think it will be a parachute.
@Ownyx
9 ай бұрын
Parachute like Cirrus airplanes probably
@deshaunjackson8188
8 ай бұрын
Death😂
@kyleahmed6345
8 ай бұрын
Splat.
@WorivpuqloDMogh
7 ай бұрын
Ballistic chute. Ultralight aircraft have them as well. I still think they have to add a wing surface of some sort. The advantage in this case would be the transition to forward flight will become easier.
@abirhassan706610 ай бұрын
great. what are the benefits compared to the propeller?
its also compact so its perfect when making flying cars.
@viduraherath4008
3 ай бұрын
@@user-jh6ik1qd7p Not really, if anything making drone based 'flying cars' is a terrible design choice in terms of energy efficiency. Forward travelling aircraft like planes are much more efficient as they use lift and forward motion to keep them in the air whereas you must be using a high rate of power from quad rotors to be able to move slowly. While yes, it makes sense for compact areas where short take off and landings are needed, in any range its better to use a car or train, or take a plane
@Kamagel00728 күн бұрын
Big hairdryer :), love it
@PaulHigginbothamSr7 ай бұрын
With a speaker for each cage this could be entirely silent. The amount of electricity used for the speaker to silence each unit this could fly perfectly silently except for the sound of the downward thrust of air. Which will be gentle compared to the thrust off propeller blades. The only thing that would instantly take her down would be a small plastic bag. Anything blown up by the rotor could be injested and create immediate results. That is where the ripping shredding motion of a standard propeller would take precedence. The pilot could be made aware of this danger and any flying bits could be vectored away from the rotors.
@kendu52Ай бұрын
Nice job, gentlemen!
@user-um9sl1kj6u7 ай бұрын
What do you guys use to control all the vectoring of the flaps in each barrel?
@UnpluggedAi10 ай бұрын
Great, you can use this for vertical take off and landing, for traveling purpose gliding is far more efficient. By this technology now you can use your rotors as tyres
@kvarnerinfoTV
9 ай бұрын
Yea, but lots of research should be done how to pull it trough
@Wild_Dice
8 ай бұрын
@@kvarnerinfoTVtough or through?
@Feintgames
8 ай бұрын
Gliding doesn't work in crowded city spaces without large airports. This technology is meant to provide solutions for crowded spaces. Imagine landing spaces in a park near your house and another at your work. You could have aerial buses where your commute is cut in half and pollution is eliminated.
@Aanaartu
7 ай бұрын
Different kinds of emergency services around the world would be probably interested
@ryanpauloneeyed9669
7 ай бұрын
@@Feintgames🤣😂🤣😂 pollution eliminated?.... You do realize a large amount of electricity is made from burning fossil fuels still?
@BrunoAmrlS2 ай бұрын
Impressive!! Just wait until the world sees this!
@VS-th6dt9 ай бұрын
Уровень шума слишком велик и навряд ли его можно снизить до приемлемых значений.
@Rusl_U
9 ай бұрын
И скорость не показали. Может до 150км/с летать. Но даже на 200 метров не пролетел никуда. Я надеялся, что хоть шум будет меньше, но нет... К сожалению, нужна какая-то другая технология.
@VS-th6dt
9 ай бұрын
@@Rusl_U Это тестовые полёты, показывают что и так тоже летать возможно и скорость тут явно не на первом месте, как и дальность, вероятно проверяли управляемость, вибрации и т.п.. Пока лучше воздушных винтов ни чего не придумали, естественно для машин подобного класса, и ,как мне кажется, в ближайшее время не придумают, вот если создадут что-то подобное крыльям и приводам стрекозы... но это уже из области фантастики)
@moscowtime8876
9 ай бұрын
Наверняка большой расход энергии ... Но выглядит интересно.
@adamwyngaard36298 ай бұрын
Besides up and down can it move in other directions, how does it do this? I'm thinking by changing speeds of individual rotors? Also what happens when losing one or more rotors/blades can it auto rotate or glide to safety?
@grantballard4362
7 ай бұрын
That is the advantage of the cyclogyro concept. It changes pitch of each blade at different times in the overall revolution to instantly vector thrust along any direction in 360 degrees.
@fedup74165 ай бұрын
Would be interesting to know some of the specs on this type of rotor, like how much energy is required to make it perform . In what ways might it be better than traditional methods of flight. It's great to see new ideas explored , but are they more practical in every way to what we have now?
@Ref.7 ай бұрын
This is amazing, great work! Thanks for inventing the future - just work on the efficiency of the blades, so the sound can be more quite and maybe work with different textures on the blades, to get more drag and lift in general, this could improve the blades and the efficiency
@suryakantasahoo58838 ай бұрын
Insane engendering....future plane are here...kudos🎉🎉
@michaelharlaar4037 ай бұрын
Nice, i will share it on my Linkedin account with >30 k followers
@biohazard72613 ай бұрын
Extraordinary🔥🔥🔥
@andrewpatricknelson9 ай бұрын
How much more power does it take. What happens if there is a problem with one or two of the rotors
@reddotclips3971
9 ай бұрын
Working on magnus effect vehicle for senior design and cant tell you one rotor going outs gonna mean a crash and a hard one at that(hard dive to a corner and flip over). Also definitely requires more power than a standard prop plane of equivalent size bc the rotors have to provide the lift whereas a prop plane the forward motion creates a lift. What I'm curious to see here is how they achieve a somewhat efficient directional motion seeing as the rotors mostly just provide lift.
@ziyademiryusufoglu714410 ай бұрын
efficiency??? basically, if aerodynamics is not the main scope one can fly a door with a powerful power motor. Same goes for fancy blades like this one.
@paulgallagher2937
9 ай бұрын
I'm skeptical. Flying a light prototype is one thing. Scaling this up to the size and weight for 2-3 passengers is going to be a huge challenge. I expect they will be going for investors based on this prototype.
@user-bc3xo3bm1m
9 ай бұрын
The ability to change the direction of thrust without turning the propeller is obviously the main scope of the mission. They probably didn’t think that they needed to explain it to anyone
@ziyademiryusufoglu7144
9 ай бұрын
@@user-bc3xo3bm1m this concept also have spoilers or fins inside that rotating drum and they tilt them also . in this design the fins are parallel to the axis of rotation. i think you have get the whole idea wrong.
@philsmycrevice6 ай бұрын
What are the advantages of this type of lift? Is it just a gimmick or does it have real value?
@Zeaiclies
3 ай бұрын
Highly efficient and strong wind resistance.
@lucaskrammer7 ай бұрын
Impressive!
@WorivpuqloDMogh7 ай бұрын
These are better and safer than propellers.
@donhuynh51867 ай бұрын
Wow!!! Grape🍇!!!!! But all seriousness though, this vehicle is dope.
@akawilly7 ай бұрын
It's smaller than a helicopter, so it BETTER be quieter. But if you scale it up to helicopter size will it really be quieter?
@user-um9sl1kj6u6 ай бұрын
For military aircraft, you would need barrels that are bigger and longer, that way they can bite/ displace more air
@whitepanthar8 ай бұрын
Bro it was epic
@user-td9jz6mv7z2 ай бұрын
Молодцы ребята!
@DJ-Illuminate6 ай бұрын
I assume the blades could be semi hidden with screens that would allow air flow but act as a guard.
@DarksaganАй бұрын
Dope asf!
@stejer2116 ай бұрын
At least they are honest about the noise - which seems to be not extremely loud. Are the going to develop a larger model for the second test pilot? LOL
@codetech55989 ай бұрын
This was on the covers of magazines like Popular Science 100 years ago.
@kvarnerinfoTV
9 ай бұрын
So
@eaglekeeper77378 ай бұрын
Does it it have a lot of ground turbulence like helicopters?
@mcd1239 ай бұрын
Next step, hide the rotors inside the frame and you have a futuristic flying car with no wings or visible propellers. F35 vtol style
@royromano97923 ай бұрын
If you can make this a cost as much as a four-wheeler. It would be the most popular vehicle ever built.
@RobGoldstein9 ай бұрын
What is the range and the speed of this?
@giorgir233411 ай бұрын
❤
@oleksiismirnov677310 ай бұрын
Good luck in making this thing quite 😕
@user-bc3xo3bm1m
9 ай бұрын
Cyclo blades are quieter than conventional blades
@oleksiismirnov6773
9 ай бұрын
@@user-bc3xo3bm1m maybe, but it's sound exactly like air strike alarm. no one will want this sing fly over their neghborhood
@vimal-cliobconsulting
2 ай бұрын
Quiet
@gkmorrison59407 ай бұрын
Remarkable! It’s about time somebody took aviation to the next level. (Sikorski was treated as a crackpot when he developed the helicopter. History repeats itself, right?)
@tieegg
7 ай бұрын
Dr Ignaz Semmelweis was also considered insane for suggesting washing your hands before delivering a baby would reduce infections. This is a cornerstone in multiple industries today.
@Endbringer9 ай бұрын
Ok. Start and landing works. Now bring it to "Mr Steele" 's backyard for real flighttesting... 😂
@user-ec9uw4fp9h9 ай бұрын
impressive!
@jusjetz7 ай бұрын
1:54 it does work.
@wallyrian30959 ай бұрын
If you lose one spool, the fall will be immediate. By reducing the wing length, noise increases. It is unlikely that the development will reach civilian use
@unacceptableminority7101
8 ай бұрын
Actually if three of the wheels are strong enough it could technically stay up. Unlike a quadcopter.
@chrisrodriguez5154
7 ай бұрын
If by lose one spool you mean one motor on one rotor breaks, there's an easy way to mitigate that risk. Simply link the rotors together with axels to a single motor (or tandem motors for redundancy) and a drive shaft with a transfer case like an AWD car
@habilsenturk85362 ай бұрын
You can turn it upside down, drive it on road too 😂
@aaronjennings83857 ай бұрын
Is this something that could be added to an electric car to improve high speed handling?
@Sofron-Mutorniy9 ай бұрын
how does it howl, this miracle of technology
@evrydayamerican7 ай бұрын
If they come to America or UK sell it to a big company they will have these flying around in a few years. It gets rid of the biggest issue the rotar. If it had some real funding it may do somthing cool. Edit. Crazy that the KZread Short that some dude made about this thing has more views by probably millions then this whole page has...Thats how i thought to look this up crazy.
@erfankhan434810 ай бұрын
How it will move towards? Not shown
@sealdogg83258 ай бұрын
These look like the early models for the troop transport in the hunger games
@PacoOtis5 ай бұрын
Bravo!
@boss_playakingpin75798 ай бұрын
Seems louder than drones and feels like it is taking a lot of power to just hover.
@KarlandKristy7 ай бұрын
Ok. I'll fly it. Not scared
@heinzditer72869 ай бұрын
So cars with wheels will fly in the future
@user-pm2cc1bn1g9 ай бұрын
Снизу надо колесики приделать все таки, удобнее будет
I have similar approach. Would like to team up. Mine is a little different
@AlixBrignol9 ай бұрын
Damn that thing is loud!
@Zorton_8 ай бұрын
You could go from driving on the ground to air travel with some modifications.
@BigShxtrDraco2 ай бұрын
that thing looks like it struggles to stay in the air and if it had to carry that test pilot it would fall 🤣
@leonardfoster21557 ай бұрын
How do you get forward flight?
@spriteblood3 ай бұрын
Euer LKW steht gerade vor unserem Haus! Hat das was zu bedeuten???? Testet ihr bei uns?
@Kaotik199O3 ай бұрын
Bro is so smart and he couldn't use common sense to sound natural whenever he was speaking about the product.... He made it very obvious he was reading of the teleprompter when he spoke.. like if he was having a conversation and doesn't know what his next word spoken will be
@Palbizu
Ай бұрын
He’s an engineer not a public speaker. He’s still smart
@vdlzts.8 ай бұрын
Man, imagine formula eVTOL racing.. crazy !!
@TheemaGT10 ай бұрын
格好良い。 「空飛ぶ車」って、マルチローターじゃなくてこういうビジュアルであってほしい。
@paulrowden57035 ай бұрын
That doesn't sound like 59db. Check out what Joby has done with its propellers.
@jonnyjack527110 ай бұрын
Все хорошо, только а чем преимущества над обычным пропеллером? Те же яйца, только в профиль...
@matteocusumano34318 ай бұрын
It's a car as well 😮
@cyclogyro10 ай бұрын
Unfortunately, there are few who work fruitfully in this direction. But the fact that this team is working on creating a cyclogyro even according to the old aerodynamic design of 1909 is also very cool!
@Adventurer1053 ай бұрын
Well done guys!!! Impressive demo... 🦘🦘🦘
@beginnereasyАй бұрын
Put this on top of gondalas for flying homes
@SvenBurkert9 ай бұрын
Interesting :) Looking forward to see more. BTW: You are intelligent people, why do you read the few sentences and not speak freely?
@chrisrodriguez5154
7 ай бұрын
Because they're engineers, not actors.
@peteky839211 ай бұрын
the future is now
@ericmendez58159 ай бұрын
How loud is this Machine? Sounds ear breaking
@FarreachАй бұрын
the only major issue I see is the noise ..once we get much quieter versions i could see these being use by everyone
@wm978211 ай бұрын
You guys sounds robotic for a minute thought you were AI. But I'm that is not as important as the revolution this technology is if you can get it to market.
@FrankEiche9 ай бұрын
Jetzt schon veraltet !
@onemore710810 ай бұрын
amazing 🤪🤪🤪🤪
@deshaunjackson81888 ай бұрын
A nice little ponzii scheme you got going here
@BlockistiumАй бұрын
you should call them Spinners
@jony37754 ай бұрын
What was the decibel level in flight? Sounded like a lawn mower on steroids…!
@ilyadenisov17319 ай бұрын
Sounds like a huge vacuum cleaner
@poohcoolguy10 ай бұрын
Ефективність таких двигунів замала. З аналогії вітряних електростанцій, їм потрібно значно більше енергії, щоб виконувати ту саму роботу, ніж звичним гвинтам. Тому, якщо з батарейками вирішать питання (яких сюди потрібно суттєво більше), то може й буде існувати такий "двигун". Але щось підказує, що не на часі.
@Petro_Bandera
9 ай бұрын
Ох вже ці індуси. Люблять щось таке придумати. Останнє це був високотемпературний надпровідник.
Пікірлер: 287
I think the propeller idea is cool and it looks safer than swinging a giant sword around
Finally, somebody has waken up, been playing with Flettner and cycle rotors in rc years ago, this is the future for many things, like wind turbines
@crunchybones2528
2 ай бұрын
wind turbines are actual trash
This is awesome! Can't wait to see how this will develop into the future
This is an interesting concept for flying drones. How noisy this solution is comparing to traditional propellers?
@pre38
4 ай бұрын
Picture your household vacuum on the highest setting with the hood off, times 4
@viduraherath4008
3 ай бұрын
Honestly with the purpouse of use on transport that uses traditional propellers, there's no real need to make them quieter. Theres a reason that no manned aircraft has made good use of toroidal propellers or these. Also it means that its limited to being used by drones since it faces perpendicularly to the flow of air so it cannot be used on a 'forward travelling' aircraft like a plane.
Totally bad a$$! Keep up the great work gentlemen, can't wait to see the next step in your design evolution.
Very exciting! This is the first thing I've seen that actually looks and feels like a flying car. Awesome.
@graffiti4christ956
9 ай бұрын
Do you live under a rock? Haha 😄 there is a far better that already has approval and actually drives.
@paranaenselol
2 ай бұрын
@@graffiti4christ956 he said it looks like a flying car, thos other ones are just upscaled quadcopters, this one with the diferent propeller look like wheels
@beginnereasy
Ай бұрын
This inspired me as well
Just amazing!
well done. exciting times.
All the best for your future testing. get this reality as soon as possible . I like to see with human carrier model .😊
Smooth landing !
Wow. So cool. Great work!
Kinda reminds me of the aricraft in the opening scene of Terminator. CycloTech... SkyNet Very Interesting concept and kudos for making it work!
The first flying lawnmower looks great 🎉
Cool. Moving around in 3D like in "The Fifth Element" is near.
@epaminon6196
9 ай бұрын
"near", as in: "this century.
@WorivpuqloDMogh
7 ай бұрын
@@epaminon6196give it 25 years or so Back in the 1970s they said the same about computers
Could the rotors act as wheels on the ground if rubber was added or if the blade structure was 3D printed similar to the new type of wheels that don't require tubes?
Well done! Great work.
when you fold up the prop, could you turn the cyclorotor like a tire so that it can run on the road as well?
Earned my sub cant wait to see the development
That’s really awesome team!
Fascinating. Had a question while I was watching - What emergency option would pilots of this kind of aircraft have during loss of power? Without wings in a conventional sense, I don't imagine gliding is possible. Are cyclo-rotors capable of some form of autorotation that would give them unpowered descent capabilities akin to a helicopter? If not, what would the general plan be for operators in the event that the motors failed? Thanks!
@salnikovevgeny
9 ай бұрын
I think it will be a parachute.
@Ownyx
9 ай бұрын
Parachute like Cirrus airplanes probably
@deshaunjackson8188
8 ай бұрын
Death😂
@kyleahmed6345
8 ай бұрын
Splat.
@WorivpuqloDMogh
7 ай бұрын
Ballistic chute. Ultralight aircraft have them as well. I still think they have to add a wing surface of some sort. The advantage in this case would be the transition to forward flight will become easier.
great. what are the benefits compared to the propeller?
@ROVERLORDD_
10 ай бұрын
quieter and more efficient apparently
@Phyroxin
9 ай бұрын
Less carnage
@user-zq1uk8vv4o
9 ай бұрын
災害救助に使ったらいいと思うヘリだとローターの関係で着地出来ない場所があるそれを踏まえると多様性のあるビークル輸送、移動、救助救援機器である
@user-jh6ik1qd7p
5 ай бұрын
its also compact so its perfect when making flying cars.
@viduraherath4008
3 ай бұрын
@@user-jh6ik1qd7p Not really, if anything making drone based 'flying cars' is a terrible design choice in terms of energy efficiency. Forward travelling aircraft like planes are much more efficient as they use lift and forward motion to keep them in the air whereas you must be using a high rate of power from quad rotors to be able to move slowly. While yes, it makes sense for compact areas where short take off and landings are needed, in any range its better to use a car or train, or take a plane
Big hairdryer :), love it
With a speaker for each cage this could be entirely silent. The amount of electricity used for the speaker to silence each unit this could fly perfectly silently except for the sound of the downward thrust of air. Which will be gentle compared to the thrust off propeller blades. The only thing that would instantly take her down would be a small plastic bag. Anything blown up by the rotor could be injested and create immediate results. That is where the ripping shredding motion of a standard propeller would take precedence. The pilot could be made aware of this danger and any flying bits could be vectored away from the rotors.
Nice job, gentlemen!
What do you guys use to control all the vectoring of the flaps in each barrel?
Great, you can use this for vertical take off and landing, for traveling purpose gliding is far more efficient. By this technology now you can use your rotors as tyres
@kvarnerinfoTV
9 ай бұрын
Yea, but lots of research should be done how to pull it trough
@Wild_Dice
8 ай бұрын
@@kvarnerinfoTVtough or through?
@Feintgames
8 ай бұрын
Gliding doesn't work in crowded city spaces without large airports. This technology is meant to provide solutions for crowded spaces. Imagine landing spaces in a park near your house and another at your work. You could have aerial buses where your commute is cut in half and pollution is eliminated.
@Aanaartu
7 ай бұрын
Different kinds of emergency services around the world would be probably interested
@ryanpauloneeyed9669
7 ай бұрын
@@Feintgames🤣😂🤣😂 pollution eliminated?.... You do realize a large amount of electricity is made from burning fossil fuels still?
Impressive!! Just wait until the world sees this!
Уровень шума слишком велик и навряд ли его можно снизить до приемлемых значений.
@Rusl_U
9 ай бұрын
И скорость не показали. Может до 150км/с летать. Но даже на 200 метров не пролетел никуда. Я надеялся, что хоть шум будет меньше, но нет... К сожалению, нужна какая-то другая технология.
@VS-th6dt
9 ай бұрын
@@Rusl_U Это тестовые полёты, показывают что и так тоже летать возможно и скорость тут явно не на первом месте, как и дальность, вероятно проверяли управляемость, вибрации и т.п.. Пока лучше воздушных винтов ни чего не придумали, естественно для машин подобного класса, и ,как мне кажется, в ближайшее время не придумают, вот если создадут что-то подобное крыльям и приводам стрекозы... но это уже из области фантастики)
@moscowtime8876
9 ай бұрын
Наверняка большой расход энергии ... Но выглядит интересно.
Besides up and down can it move in other directions, how does it do this? I'm thinking by changing speeds of individual rotors? Also what happens when losing one or more rotors/blades can it auto rotate or glide to safety?
@grantballard4362
7 ай бұрын
That is the advantage of the cyclogyro concept. It changes pitch of each blade at different times in the overall revolution to instantly vector thrust along any direction in 360 degrees.
Would be interesting to know some of the specs on this type of rotor, like how much energy is required to make it perform . In what ways might it be better than traditional methods of flight. It's great to see new ideas explored , but are they more practical in every way to what we have now?
This is amazing, great work! Thanks for inventing the future - just work on the efficiency of the blades, so the sound can be more quite and maybe work with different textures on the blades, to get more drag and lift in general, this could improve the blades and the efficiency
Insane engendering....future plane are here...kudos🎉🎉
Nice, i will share it on my Linkedin account with >30 k followers
Extraordinary🔥🔥🔥
How much more power does it take. What happens if there is a problem with one or two of the rotors
@reddotclips3971
9 ай бұрын
Working on magnus effect vehicle for senior design and cant tell you one rotor going outs gonna mean a crash and a hard one at that(hard dive to a corner and flip over). Also definitely requires more power than a standard prop plane of equivalent size bc the rotors have to provide the lift whereas a prop plane the forward motion creates a lift. What I'm curious to see here is how they achieve a somewhat efficient directional motion seeing as the rotors mostly just provide lift.
efficiency??? basically, if aerodynamics is not the main scope one can fly a door with a powerful power motor. Same goes for fancy blades like this one.
@paulgallagher2937
9 ай бұрын
I'm skeptical. Flying a light prototype is one thing. Scaling this up to the size and weight for 2-3 passengers is going to be a huge challenge. I expect they will be going for investors based on this prototype.
@user-bc3xo3bm1m
9 ай бұрын
The ability to change the direction of thrust without turning the propeller is obviously the main scope of the mission. They probably didn’t think that they needed to explain it to anyone
@ziyademiryusufoglu7144
9 ай бұрын
@@user-bc3xo3bm1m this concept also have spoilers or fins inside that rotating drum and they tilt them also . in this design the fins are parallel to the axis of rotation. i think you have get the whole idea wrong.
What are the advantages of this type of lift? Is it just a gimmick or does it have real value?
@Zeaiclies
3 ай бұрын
Highly efficient and strong wind resistance.
Impressive!
These are better and safer than propellers.
Wow!!! Grape🍇!!!!! But all seriousness though, this vehicle is dope.
It's smaller than a helicopter, so it BETTER be quieter. But if you scale it up to helicopter size will it really be quieter?
For military aircraft, you would need barrels that are bigger and longer, that way they can bite/ displace more air
Bro it was epic
Молодцы ребята!
I assume the blades could be semi hidden with screens that would allow air flow but act as a guard.
Dope asf!
At least they are honest about the noise - which seems to be not extremely loud. Are the going to develop a larger model for the second test pilot? LOL
This was on the covers of magazines like Popular Science 100 years ago.
@kvarnerinfoTV
9 ай бұрын
So
Does it it have a lot of ground turbulence like helicopters?
Next step, hide the rotors inside the frame and you have a futuristic flying car with no wings or visible propellers. F35 vtol style
If you can make this a cost as much as a four-wheeler. It would be the most popular vehicle ever built.
What is the range and the speed of this?
❤
Good luck in making this thing quite 😕
@user-bc3xo3bm1m
9 ай бұрын
Cyclo blades are quieter than conventional blades
@oleksiismirnov6773
9 ай бұрын
@@user-bc3xo3bm1m maybe, but it's sound exactly like air strike alarm. no one will want this sing fly over their neghborhood
@vimal-cliobconsulting
2 ай бұрын
Quiet
Remarkable! It’s about time somebody took aviation to the next level. (Sikorski was treated as a crackpot when he developed the helicopter. History repeats itself, right?)
@tieegg
7 ай бұрын
Dr Ignaz Semmelweis was also considered insane for suggesting washing your hands before delivering a baby would reduce infections. This is a cornerstone in multiple industries today.
Ok. Start and landing works. Now bring it to "Mr Steele" 's backyard for real flighttesting... 😂
impressive!
1:54 it does work.
If you lose one spool, the fall will be immediate. By reducing the wing length, noise increases. It is unlikely that the development will reach civilian use
@unacceptableminority7101
8 ай бұрын
Actually if three of the wheels are strong enough it could technically stay up. Unlike a quadcopter.
@chrisrodriguez5154
7 ай бұрын
If by lose one spool you mean one motor on one rotor breaks, there's an easy way to mitigate that risk. Simply link the rotors together with axels to a single motor (or tandem motors for redundancy) and a drive shaft with a transfer case like an AWD car
You can turn it upside down, drive it on road too 😂
Is this something that could be added to an electric car to improve high speed handling?
how does it howl, this miracle of technology
If they come to America or UK sell it to a big company they will have these flying around in a few years. It gets rid of the biggest issue the rotar. If it had some real funding it may do somthing cool. Edit. Crazy that the KZread Short that some dude made about this thing has more views by probably millions then this whole page has...Thats how i thought to look this up crazy.
How it will move towards? Not shown
These look like the early models for the troop transport in the hunger games
Bravo!
Seems louder than drones and feels like it is taking a lot of power to just hover.
Ok. I'll fly it. Not scared
So cars with wheels will fly in the future
Снизу надо колесики приделать все таки, удобнее будет
Can we see it fly out of ground effect?
これ、ヘリウム気球の飛行船にも良いのでは? 揚力体構造とフィルム太陽電池とか組み合わせ長時間滞空や、大型貨物の山岳運搬とか、夢が拡がります。
Salute to those who stick with their dreams. 👍🏿
I have similar approach. Would like to team up. Mine is a little different
Damn that thing is loud!
You could go from driving on the ground to air travel with some modifications.
that thing looks like it struggles to stay in the air and if it had to carry that test pilot it would fall 🤣
How do you get forward flight?
Euer LKW steht gerade vor unserem Haus! Hat das was zu bedeuten???? Testet ihr bei uns?
Bro is so smart and he couldn't use common sense to sound natural whenever he was speaking about the product.... He made it very obvious he was reading of the teleprompter when he spoke.. like if he was having a conversation and doesn't know what his next word spoken will be
@Palbizu
Ай бұрын
He’s an engineer not a public speaker. He’s still smart
Man, imagine formula eVTOL racing.. crazy !!
格好良い。 「空飛ぶ車」って、マルチローターじゃなくてこういうビジュアルであってほしい。
That doesn't sound like 59db. Check out what Joby has done with its propellers.
Все хорошо, только а чем преимущества над обычным пропеллером? Те же яйца, только в профиль...
It's a car as well 😮
Unfortunately, there are few who work fruitfully in this direction. But the fact that this team is working on creating a cyclogyro even according to the old aerodynamic design of 1909 is also very cool!
Well done guys!!! Impressive demo... 🦘🦘🦘
Put this on top of gondalas for flying homes
Interesting :) Looking forward to see more. BTW: You are intelligent people, why do you read the few sentences and not speak freely?
@chrisrodriguez5154
7 ай бұрын
Because they're engineers, not actors.
the future is now
How loud is this Machine? Sounds ear breaking
the only major issue I see is the noise ..once we get much quieter versions i could see these being use by everyone
You guys sounds robotic for a minute thought you were AI. But I'm that is not as important as the revolution this technology is if you can get it to market.
Jetzt schon veraltet !
amazing 🤪🤪🤪🤪
A nice little ponzii scheme you got going here
you should call them Spinners
What was the decibel level in flight? Sounded like a lawn mower on steroids…!
Sounds like a huge vacuum cleaner
Ефективність таких двигунів замала. З аналогії вітряних електростанцій, їм потрібно значно більше енергії, щоб виконувати ту саму роботу, ніж звичним гвинтам. Тому, якщо з батарейками вирішать питання (яких сюди потрібно суттєво більше), то може й буде існувати такий "двигун". Але щось підказує, що не на часі.
@Petro_Bandera
9 ай бұрын
Ох вже ці індуси. Люблять щось таке придумати. Останнє це був високотемпературний надпровідник.