Get The Full 1 Hour Video: www.patreon.com/MathScienceTutor Direct Link to The Full Video: bit.ly/3vShovS Chemistry PDF Worksheets: www.video-tutor.net/chemistry-basic-introduction.html

@hadeelalansari5421

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you so much for your content!

@jalebibikunashi4166

2 жыл бұрын

Tq

I hope you realize how much we all appreciate these! Thank you so much 😊

Dear chemistry tutor, I am a chemistry laboratory technician trainee from Berlin. I want appreciate your work and the way you chop every topic into digestible and understandable pieces. I wanted to ask you, wether you´d like to do a video conference with my school and explain us hwo we can learn chemistry easily and show us your methods. you are very inspirational. The chemistry department would appreciate it.

This man is insane. I was just here last week learning about calculus 2 and here I am again learning about crystal field theory

@leonndhlozi2739

3 жыл бұрын

🙌

@amandubey5696

3 жыл бұрын

That man was different. Any other person.

Dislikes from professors who couldn’t explain it this easily.

@karthikkd3471

2 жыл бұрын

😂😂

@ansonchow3403

2 жыл бұрын

That’s why I’m here

@UnveilingTheUnspoken62

Жыл бұрын

Ekdam Sahi❤️

@Musfiqur_anik

Жыл бұрын

What? 💀

@mdalaminmollik9600

Жыл бұрын

Low brain

You dont even need college. All you neeed is this guys videos and its much better than college lecture slides. Thank you so much. Your videos are so well explained. Awesome

@daughteroftheking3220

2 жыл бұрын

Facts. Literally we are out here paying college tuition to lecturers that just leave us confused, when Organic Chem Tutor deserves all our tuition and explains things under an hour. He is a legend!

@aleeshashabir83

2 жыл бұрын

Literally my situation , paid so much for the lectures , but all the lecturer does is read , does practices where she skips all the steps , and expects us to just know the content and then throw hw and exams and tests , like wth . This dude is saving my life

I have to say this man ,it's been a hell of a year for me you know first year of chemical engineering...and i got to tell you how much I'm appreciate what you doing I'm really glad that i found your channel ,you've helped me much more than my college did ,you just simplified anything and this made me suffer much less , if i could i would've donate more ,glad you here man :).

@Parakeetboy_yt

11 ай бұрын

bruh .. u learning this at chemical engineering ????!!!!!!!!!!!!,... we are having this as our 12th std topic ☠☠

@mahanbasu889

10 ай бұрын

​@@Parakeetboy_yt exactly 💀

@navyblueskiess

8 ай бұрын

​@@Parakeetboy_ytyou'll get those again in engineering

@nihilisticnirvana

7 ай бұрын

@@Parakeetboy_yt same. INDIA

@rishikmahith2885

5 ай бұрын

​@@Parakeetboy_yt9 th class

Your videos are always the first one I click on when I search up a difficult concept such as CFT, thank you man!

this man explained what my professor couldnt explain in just 20 min. legend

Thank you so much for this! I was struggling to understand this since we just went over an entire chapter in 40 minutes and have a test the day after tomorrow on it. Your way of explaining stuff is amazing. Thank you once again!

Thank you so much for this amazing tutorial video!! You’re the greatest professor I’ve ever seen!! I’ll be writing my inorganic exams late next month, and I’m assured of an excellent performance due to your help. May God continue showering his abundant blessings upon you! 🙏

I'm writting my exam tomorrow, this video was better then my 3hour×5 lectures.

We really appreciate your efforts ❤️

Thank you so much for all these videos. It is providing more help than you think.

my prof zoom link he took me over 50 mins to explain the crystal field theory, but I couldn't understand it. But you guy do it. Thank you so much.

@yangamahlazo4112

3 жыл бұрын

I need your help

Just small correction: d(x^2-y^2) is on the X Y axis, and d(XY) is between the axis.

@thef2pguy249

10 ай бұрын

ahh yes i got confused thinking i was wrong thank u!!!

@maryaahx

2 ай бұрын

This confused me too! So much easier to remember the squared ones together and was afraid that didn't work

@pspoonamsharma

19 күн бұрын

Yes, I checked in the comments section to see if anyone pointed this out...

i really enjoy how you teach these information !!! god bless you real professor

Professor you have helped me understand Crystal field Theory, well done. I really appreciate your effort

This man can teach me something in 20 minutes that took my professor a week.

I finally got it.... thank you! ♥️

thank you for explaining it in such a easiest way

😊What A clear Explanation!!!!! Loved It ❤

you have a vid for everything man, thank you thank you thank you

Appreciate your vids

Thanks, your videos are pretty useful ❤

you helped us alot thank you brother

Thank you so much for this!

Thank you so much this video was of great help

I am from India and last in last year of my high school I find this video very helpful thankyou.

Very nice you just save my chem exam

It was smooth 😎. If I study chemistry from you I think I will fall in love with it 😂.

You don't need a perfect drawing because it's those perfect drawings that sometimes confuse the hell out of me.

You deserve the best man 😎

Well explained, I am almost 🎓, keep up good work

holy moly dude, where have you been? thankyou so much xx

Yes ! I love this video. Could you do some more inorganic chemistry videos and along with formal mathematics?

@miheroes7038

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/m5yj29KHf5ayY7A.html

You are great man.Thanks 👍

Is this a person or a computer? Whatever it's, it's too good

Thank you!

Thanku Happy New Year🤗👍🥳

You're a life saver

thx for explanation much love!!!

Nice explanation

I am so grateful

YOU ARE A KINGGGGGGGGG

Best ever,,bro deserve hon.nobe world prize

YOU ARE THE BEST OF THE BEST

Thank you so much!

Thank you so much

Thank you greatly.

Excellent!!

You are a lifesaver!!

@miheroes7038

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/m5yj29KHf5ayY7A.html

Thanks very much!!!

Please also do molecular orbital for octahedral complexs

I donno he explains so perfectly Like I blindly just listen to him Thanks to him I completely so many topics for neet May God bless you Thanks a ton 🥺🌼✨

You are Amazing.

Tell me if i'm wrong, but shouldn't the PE in the final exercise be equal to zero. This because you only add P for electrons that pair due to the pairings energy being smaller than going into the eg levels and therefore you add it, otherwise you should have added the +3/5 delta oct. Therefore with high spin, there is never PE involved and for low spin for PE, you only count the pairs that are formed that would not have formed if it had been a low spin complex.

@sonemaster

2 жыл бұрын

This is exactly what i wanted to point out. As you say, you only count the pairing that ocurrs in comparison with the hypothetical situation of espherical charge surrounding the metal, when all d orbitals are degenerate. That is because the crystal field stabilization energy is the relative stabilization of the complex vs. the ideal situation where no splitting of the orbitals takes place. This means that, for a d6 in an espherical charge distribution situation you already have one electron paired, so the crystal field stabilization energy for a high spin complex doesnt involve electron pairing.

@alokkumar5123

2 жыл бұрын

@@sonemaster yes you are right

thank you so much!

That was great. Thanks

@miheroes7038

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/m5yj29KHf5ayY7A.html

Thanks a lot👍

I noticed that he handles the axes quite loosely during his drawings of the d orbitals. The xy, xz, and yz orbitals are off axis, while x2-y2 is along the axes as well as z2 being along the z axis.

yay! please make more inorganic videos

Tysm man

Thankssss❤❤❤❤

We have to learn this in high school, this is so frustrating

i rlly hope ur having an amazing day

Thanks

can anyone please tell me which one is more stable, Fe2+ or Fe3+ on the basis of octahedral distortion? please

o nghakolla blind ko bolelle khutmane. big ups👍👍

thank u

Happy new year sir

@miheroes7038

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/m5yj29KHf5ayY7A.html

Nice

hwo do we know now tho which field applies to the complex we are naming? do we just look which orbital arrangement filled with the electrons is the most stable?

Thank you kind sir. My inorganic professor's lecture notes are a fragmented disaster XD

Great video! Just one question: I thought the dx2-y2 orbitals are parallel to the x and y axis?

@gabrielhigginbotham7101

2 жыл бұрын

i believe parallel to the plane of x and y and within the actual x and y axis

@crevect4799

2 жыл бұрын

@@gabrielhigginbotham7101 Yeah. In the video, he explains it in a way that the dx2-y2 orbital isn’t directly along the x axis and y axis. Now I’m so confused…

@YISTECH

Жыл бұрын

@@crevect4799 but he literally drew them along the x and y axis bruh

@maryaahx

2 ай бұрын

I was confused about this too, he said that x2y2 is not on the axes and that xy is on the axes.. although it seems that he might have mixed them up? I can only find the orientation with x2y2 on the axes

The pairing energy contributions to the CFSE are done incorrectly here. The CFSE is the stabilization energy of the d electrons due to the energy splitting of the d orbitals. So, for both the high-spin and low-spin (weak- and strong-field) cases, the comparison should be with a system with zero splitting of the d-orbitals. For a zero-splitting case, there would still be one orbital with two electrons when there is a total of 6 d electrons. Therefore, the CFSE for the d^6 high-spin system does NOT include any pairing energy contribution because that electron pair would still be paired even if the d orbitals weren’t split at all. And the low-spin case would include only 2P, not 3P - again, because one electron pair would still be paired even if the d orbitals weren’t split at all.

Good

Hellow sir, Could please explain about tetrahedral and square plannar?

thanks lot ur Savior

Can you please explain the coordination number 4 complexes also

So i had this doubt that while calculating CFSE for d⁶ for WFL that last electron that got paired was natural pairing and not forced pairing so we are not suppose to consider that energy same for the last electron of SFL

you guys are learning this in college?

@zzzluvsk

2 ай бұрын

Yes

only 13k views? Must be really easy ;)

Sir I have doubt in d orbital shape

hey why are the units of cfse in cm-1

How do you know if it is weak field or strong field?

@soujanyachatterjee09

2 жыл бұрын

From the streptochemical series

Can you please explain walsh diagram

kinda sad not the whole thing is there but pog vid thanks bruh

u saved me

The plane-orientation of dx2-y2 and dxy is probably mixed up in this video? dx2-y2 is on the axes and dxy is between is my previous understanding

This guy is literally saving us from being weeded😭, we survive another year in college, sigh🚶‍♀️

FANTASTIC!!!

At 20:05, the pairing energy is included in the CFSE calculation, even though there would be an equal pairing energy in the original d energy level (as in, prior to crystal field splitting). Therefore, should the pairing energy really be included in the CFSE calculation?

@victorakoum8972

8 ай бұрын

yes

GOAT

btw it's Delta sub o not sub 0. The o stands for octahedron

dx²-y² is directly on xy axis and dxy is in the XY plane but not directly on x and y axes

what electron configuration do you need to have to be a strong field?

@t4gguk

Жыл бұрын

fields are dependent on the ligand and is given by the spectrochemical series. ligands like ammonia, water and carbon monoxide are strong field ligands and the halogen anions are weak field ligands

wow!

Ok like you are Bae! Da fuck I need to pay thousands of dollars in tuition when I could just support people like this who put work into actually teaching the subjects! Like it is mind blowing!

I love you