Judiciary serves selective citizens at midnight,and others takes ages to get a date for hearing. So I feel it is corrupt in my observation.

@rahulmishra800

5 ай бұрын

WTF man? They connect everything they know with Sanatan Dharma..... Khajurao temples were made by a certain king...... What does it have to do with Sanatan Dharma? If this is the case, why am I wrong if I start connecting Terr ism with one certain religion? At that time these very fools start saying no terr ist doesn't have any religion?? But Lusty Foolish Kings who did things totally out if their minds, are somehow now part of Sanatan Dharma?? Then I think I'll be killed if I mention parts of some other religion......

@ajaydalaya2195

5 ай бұрын

Kamasutra wasn't written by a king. It is part of sanathan Dharma. Sanathan Dharma isn't all abt being serious and boring. It has many facets that connect equally with deep philosophy, romance, history , celebrating life and much more. Sanathan Dharma doesn't have a concept of original Sin that which abrahmic religions have.

@tanmaykumar1753

4 ай бұрын

@@ajaydalaya2195 its a sutra , not a Shastra . so most probably its wasnt a important text in hinduism .

The moderator is highly biased when J Sai talks, she is impatient, does not listen, interrupts him several times, when other person talks, she is entirely opposite.

@madhukapoor7733

5 ай бұрын

Exactly in such things people like Sai should intervene

@BRSN246

5 ай бұрын

Yes are absolutely right. Very biased.

@ravs4461

5 ай бұрын

her brain is left washed , brain is bleached so much that cells have died, she seems impossible to think of non colonial thought

@bvisvana

4 ай бұрын

Sai's magnanimity shines

Sai scorches with logic. The lady seems as if she has bitten more than she can chew.

@ManoK54

5 ай бұрын

The moderator please equip with credible materials rather than hearsay.

The guy comes with such valid pointers

@AmitJhamb

5 ай бұрын

@ somnathbose -- dear,right ; she also comes with her narratives / agenda , but she failed miserably.

@somnathbose7455

5 ай бұрын

@@AmitJhamb and whenever she gets caught she tries to run away by dragging the the other guy into the conversation to save her ass

@yahooezone

5 ай бұрын

@@somnathbose7455 exactly what wanted to say...and she exposes herself that she is not moderator but a B team of the Homo guy.

JSD is an institution, I am always in awe with the depth of his knowledge on the subjects he speaks of

जय श्री राम

Let's bring Muslim Law Board to the discussion as well , lets hear their point as well.....MMS (ex-PM) will be upset.

It's not court.. it's judge's..

She loves her voice too much

The moderator lacks full knowledge about the subject but takes biased views. Sri Sai Deepak is always putting his side with logic and reason. The other guy was quoting USA as if it is a standard of developed society. Bharat and some Asian countries had women Prime Ministers whereas USA had none. There are people who eat only vegetables like those who eat meat and there are vegan also. In future if some group wants to eat human flesh can we allow it or go to court to claim it as a fundamental right???. There cannot be only rights and no responsibility. Hope the so called liberals understand and respect rights of others also.

She shouldn't be quoting from our itihasas and puranas if she hasn't studied from a proper acharya. She is quoting google😂😂😂 she is completely off on this.

This is actually an unemployment issue. Some people have no constructive work to do so they bring up such issues to keep themselves busy without business

@MrLikea8055

5 ай бұрын

Haha, 😅 this is my very same logic wrt People who use KZread comment section. One would say it's discourse, but i say otherwise.

@ravs4461

5 ай бұрын

awesome👍

A good lawyer has great knowledge about the law , not the judge

I thought she was the moderator 😂

Jai Sriram!

Moderator please kindly familiarise with topic and be equipped with substanstial facts,instead of hearsay.,cause it needs to be meaningful,fruitful and beneficial discussion at the expanse of time.

Telll her to understand our Hindu temples are not free.

Sai Deepak is fantastic in his thoughts and puts it very cogently across.

The moderator is supposed to be impartial but this one never is.

@ravs4461

5 ай бұрын

she is actually desperate to throw most irrelevant items with skewed interpretations the way she says fundamental rights as if the spelling is FFuNNDDAMMEnTTaal Rrrigths is silly

Absolutely, your dishonour! Courts never make mistakes BUT people at the helm of affairs do. Amen.

Sai Deepak was as always Superb .. moderator and her Other Panelist were just Squirming due to lack of Substance and Zero logic on their part

In the end sai deepak ji has nailed it to her properly, she was getting impatient and tried to act like a girl and fetch sympathy to move on, but sai being sai did not budge he just made his point which was the most logical and therefore unacceptable to Shoma. If she was mature all she had to say was I disagree with that but let’s move on. No she cannot say that because that’s accepting defeat right?

"In Kerala Uncle is perfectly legitimate as a marriage partner" Since when????

This Woman Moderator Doesnt even have an iota of Knowledge of Sanatana Puranas and History

On the stage we see a narrative push by the anchor which is non-toxic just as we see an ad on the stage 'Johnnie walker - non alcoholic".

Caste is not about genetics but Gender of Sex is.

India is in safe hands 👐

The moderator is a classic example of a delusional being.

She Googles and says from Constitution...😅

When one can criticize pm, hm, those who have the mandate & legality then why contempt when one speaks against the wrong in judiciary.

Humans are not individuals, we are social animals, there will be a disciplined, way of living for human lives. U will be correct if u r a pure animal. The difference between humans and animals is to be protected.

Why at all have a concept of marriage at all then? The same privileges of marriage can be extended to any two entities man and woman, man and man, woman and woman, man and animal/ living being/ material. That marriage in itself isa social-legal creation.

@nikhilmishra6085

5 ай бұрын

As Sai mentioned in the last segment, there are laws that protect women's rights during and after marriage. Without a concept of marriage, those laws safeguarding women's rights will lose their significance. Rather than extending, we probably need to formulate better laws specifically protecting the rights of same-sex couples.

@yushpi

5 ай бұрын

​@@nikhilmishra6085why do same sex couples want to come under the ambit of civil laws anyways? Whats essential is that such marriages and partnerships aren't outlawed.. Why do they want to invite state in their personal lives? And what will they do with it.. settle alimony claims?

Yes. Never. But some times blunders. How many judgements have been overturned?

❤

The moderator gets impatient when Sai is talking

Jai shree Ram

When she wants to debate she debates when he rebutts then suddenly she becomes a moderator and 'a woman '

The one who want same sex marriage during rally screams hindutva se azadi so as a hindu even if our books and other things allow same sex marriage i dont

What about red light female workers and their human rights, every one forget them, ? Same sex marriage is black spot of our civil society.

Jus like judiciary functions selectively for selective people at midnight, the hospital do postmortem in midnite like in Sushant Singh Rajput, a superstar.

Marrying niece is not practiced in kerala but tamil nadu.I think this inbreeding is one reason that tamil nadu has lot of transgender population.In kerala there still exist practice of marrying cousins. In north rural areas there are still cases of brothers sharing wife.Not to hurt anyone's feeling guys.

I need to ask one question here whether the domestic violence happens for women only not for men.. When there will be equality right and equality protection of gender in the eyes of law will be established?????

Sai is extremely articulate and logical, but i didn't hear the counter point for the moderator's point about homosexuality being celebrated in Hinduism

What I don’t understand is, why do gay men/woman want to fall into a hetero normative institution called marriage? Ask for taxation and inheritance rights. You don’t need an approval from the government in the name of marriage. If you want to get a separation, you don’t have to go through the laborious process of a divorce. Pick and choose the best from a marriage institution that goes with your life and ask for a Civil Union to include the ones you choose. Marriage as an institution is outdated and ruins your life if you want to get out of it. Don’t make your life hell. Just get the rights that are necessary to live a good life.

If the concept of marriage is procreation then Sai Deepak wins. If Marriage is about emotional physical and mental bond; love and support then his opponent debater Saurabh Kirbal wins.

Can't stand this shoma chaudhury! Don't know how these two eminent lawyers put up with her virtue signaling.

The Moderator isnt acting like moderator but is behaving like a prejudiced person with a clear bias

Going on and on with Hindu egs only why no other religion and such long question,it has become disgusting now

She's is So conniving and uncomfortable Very biased Very Badmash

Sai is like a IIM professor trying to explain to fundamental Mgmt. concepts to two eight graders. The host and the other guests arguments are so flawed.

Moderator is biased, doesn't listen properly, and when she doesn't have any answer , she just turns to the other person.

India is democratic in parliament but autocratic in courts. Pew!

who is this woman? why interfere when deepak Sir was saying?why she behave like this.

Yeah the main problem is , judiciary have to change or modify so many laws. If they recognises the gay couples marriage.

Hope this so called moderator reads all the comments mentioned below.

Put Sai Deepak to fight for Disha and SSR.

kerala law exist even inspite of hindu dharmashastra stand on marriage is because that dharmashastra clarify varieties of sources of law /hindu law and custom is viewed as one of sources and manytime it act primary source and even dharmshastras/arthashastra suggest dont to disrespect customs .we dont much believe in top down approach like king make law which just eradicate all custom or dharmashastra .this is approach of concept of secular state and state make law and that all.whats J sai deepak is refering to that SC has no power nor expertize is actually that SC law is like top down appraoch 5 judge sit and decide on issue where custom has to say

We love j saideepak

Who is host

I believe that the same sex couples should be allowed to marry via a court marriage but to actually hold a religious one they must have to file a form of request in front of their respective religious community and only allowed when that perticular community is okay to let them hold religious gathering. This way no religious sentiments will be hurt and no individual rights will be hurt either. And as for society (at least sanatan dharm) it will still take some considerable amount of time before a same sex marriage will be accepted but we have always continued to evolve our ways hopefully we will find our own answers to these complex questions as well.

No system is working independently after Modi's time

@nitlover8319

3 ай бұрын

😂

Sai Deepak has always been correct and to the point. The anchor (anchors) should learn to put the questions in strait forward and not make it a big paragraph which irritates the listener. Apparently she is lost in her own points.

Where does it end. Tomorrow someone will want to marry an animal. What happens then?

10:48 alag shehar hee bsaa do

Why i feel like it was 1 v2 against sai and he still Clutched.......

Bro do you want to empower Temples as social Institution according to Hindu ethos.

Do our courts give any damn to ethical nd moral conducts nd behaviour? I don't think so .....coz at this time this issue is in debate after let say a decade after ppl will file litigations for going into sagotra marriage (as science also proved that its not good for future generations+ that's why we have concept of leaving some gotra from MTR nd fTR sides).... 2-point of going in courts after decades will be allowing juveniles to go for relationship rights nd lowering the bar of boys nd girls age of marriage ...as said by SC by seeing so many cases under pocso....so in the end my point is some how these ethical nd morality as adhered by society is. No more in need in near future . Right? 😅

Our ex cji lodha can take medical council, cricket council to enjoy the power & money. Who is cji to select CBI chief . If 750 mp suggestion in njac is rejected by 5 members who r not accountable, not on merit , not domain expert is nothing short of dadagiri.

Inter Varna Marriages Are Allowed According to Vedic Puranic History

ban wqaf act

This Panelist who says Sagotra Marriages were not pwrmitted isnt even aware of the scientific reason behing abstaining from Aagotra Marriages ..Such an Ignoramus

saurabh should go to nursrery

The relation the presenter explained doesn’t exist in Kerala so please correct it.

Sir what happened to your hand...plz b safe, n take care 🙏

Moderator is so selective, rude and twisted

Who is she

Why is she so animated?

Mr. Sourabh Kirpal's humiliations in his personal life for being a gay himself have gotten the better of him here. But Sai is as incisive as ever in his arguments.

Sherdil.

Are are madam kahe itna Darr Rahi ho

12:30 what a looney!

Same sex can live together. But why do you call this marriage? It is something entirely different. Call it anything else. Make separate laws for them. But don't bring them under marriage. Marriage is heterosexual, basically intended for reproduction under a legal umbrella an further intended for mutual support and eligibility to be designated as a family. Don't , don't call same sex couple as married couples. They are not.

WHY ENTERTAIN USELESS SHOWS and Concept and Every one sitting in the Show. I am dame sure zero output next 10 days LAWYERS MAKE MISTAKES And later Correct as Per Evidence and Money. When there is Strong Law No Lawyer be have Job on civil society. WE NEED NATION WITHOUT JAIL,COURT LAWYER MUST BE ONLY FOR DOCUMENTS WORK FOR CIVIL WORKS AND PAPER WORK.ITS MY PERSONAL WISH.

Abe...ye to...wai....barkhabhai ..

She talks too much…we are here for Sai, not her voice…

I wish these foolish same gender marriage be made in Shariyat courts and let it then be made to Hindu laws. Super counter logical as usual by Shri Sai Deepak Ji

You are wrong not Kerala but it’s Tamilnadu and Telugu speaking states. Get your facts right before debating

What else you could expext fron ANCHOR, who works for SORES n Team. Yupu better stop nonsense. Proved beyond doubt that her family backgrounf n THIRD RATED.

@narayananr577

5 ай бұрын

Perhaps.

If half of the radicals sits and talks . Middle East would have heaven on earth 😢

Bro using his lawyer education on everything