This is by far the best explained CFR lesson. Thank you for doing this!
@5th_Interaction6 ай бұрын
Beautifully articulated.
@michaelschoenhals3764 ай бұрын
thanks a ton for this! great video.
@ruairi-spain3 ай бұрын
More videos please! Great work, you make hard things easier to visualise. I hope you get back to making KZread videos ❤
@sounakmojumder5689Ай бұрын
Hi, thank you do you have any pytorch application?
@bertobertoberto24211 ай бұрын
DS student here, trying to grasp DeepCFR, amazing video... just wanted to point out a thing... the "P(K|Qb)" you say that you use Bayes rule and you phrase it like "P(P1 would play bet when they have a king)/P(P1 would play bet overall)"... I might be mistaking, but i don't see how you are applying Bayes... instead, I got your same result using the definition of conditional probability P(a|b) = P(a,b)/P(b)... because I get "P(KQb)/P(Qb)", now Q and b/K are independent events, so "[P(Kb)P(Q)]/[P(Q)P(b)]"... from here, applying the definition of joint probability and total probability, I get your same final probability Apart from this, thank you so much
@jonnyx850
5 ай бұрын
You're correct, he's not using baye's rule/thm. It's the definition of conditional probability in Bayesian stats that he's using. It's actually fairly common for people to mix them up. Nbd
@CsabaSzepesvari
3 ай бұрын
Some people actually say that Bayes' rule/thm = definition of conditional probability. In a way, they are not completely wrong:)
Пікірлер: 10
Amazing step by step example for CFR !!!
This is by far the best explained CFR lesson. Thank you for doing this!
Beautifully articulated.
thanks a ton for this! great video.
More videos please! Great work, you make hard things easier to visualise. I hope you get back to making KZread videos ❤
Hi, thank you do you have any pytorch application?
DS student here, trying to grasp DeepCFR, amazing video... just wanted to point out a thing... the "P(K|Qb)" you say that you use Bayes rule and you phrase it like "P(P1 would play bet when they have a king)/P(P1 would play bet overall)"... I might be mistaking, but i don't see how you are applying Bayes... instead, I got your same result using the definition of conditional probability P(a|b) = P(a,b)/P(b)... because I get "P(KQb)/P(Qb)", now Q and b/K are independent events, so "[P(Kb)P(Q)]/[P(Q)P(b)]"... from here, applying the definition of joint probability and total probability, I get your same final probability Apart from this, thank you so much
@jonnyx850
5 ай бұрын
You're correct, he's not using baye's rule/thm. It's the definition of conditional probability in Bayesian stats that he's using. It's actually fairly common for people to mix them up. Nbd
@CsabaSzepesvari
3 ай бұрын
Some people actually say that Bayes' rule/thm = definition of conditional probability. In a way, they are not completely wrong:)
You are fucking awesome Bro 🙏