And that’s why we created Corona

@rudyferrell

3 жыл бұрын

That's right, so that they can inject everyone with something

@OG1919

2 жыл бұрын

it never was about the virus but it was always about the vaccine. The flu usually doesn't kill people and certainly not healthy people. But the vaccine kills everyone who is inoculated.

@Reactivate100

2 жыл бұрын

@@OG1919 someone is awake. 🙂 Be prepared for UN Chinese troops parachuting in to finish the job of. 🥰👋

@goken6752

2 жыл бұрын

@@OG1919 so according to your logic 3 billion people should be dead but they arent why is that ohh wait of course you base your logic off misinformation and propoganda

@Itdontmatter69

2 жыл бұрын

Yup. Well the vaccine anyway

Coronavirus has entered the chat

@vahagy6579

4 жыл бұрын

Lolll

@thegreatonetheone8226

4 жыл бұрын

Oh yeah ..

@rirmgigs

4 жыл бұрын

It’s making a bit of a hit. Which was inevitable. But it’s nowhere what is needed to put a real hit into overpopulation. I quite like the (book) ending of Inferno. That would work!

@dionwlaw917

4 жыл бұрын

@@rirmgigs I would prefer no one's dies and eventually birth rates decline and population naturally balances

@rirmgigs

4 жыл бұрын

Spoiler alert! That’s the ending of the book. A human induced forced reduction in birth rates. 1/3 of all humans incl offspring are infertile.

Yes we can. Remove all warning labels and let nature take its course.

@melindanash9990

4 жыл бұрын

Lol, natural selection.

@soulassassin0g

4 жыл бұрын

There will be law suits up the ass if that happens lol.

@kevitamaster-brewkombucha5472

4 жыл бұрын

Lmaooooo😂😂😂

@cristiniarguedini6186

4 жыл бұрын

Except when it's you dying

@user-qk2bh5xw1g

4 жыл бұрын

People say what they want when it is not them

The only answer is to get all those six infinity stones. :)

@yusufdunphy5402

4 жыл бұрын

BlockObito And make sure it doesn’t effect all life especially plants because we need plants for eating. Make sure it effects only the humans.

@nielsqbc4

4 жыл бұрын

Population decline is spreading, overpopulation is an outdated hysteria from the 20th century.

@raccoonboye5361

4 жыл бұрын

thanos is my man

@thebotanist7145

4 жыл бұрын

Also kill like 75% of All idiots on earth please.

@thebotanist7145

4 жыл бұрын

@Midousuji Akira oof

Just add birth control as a requirement for aid to the third world. The biggest growth in population is in some of the poorest countries in the world. Thus increasing their poverty and need for aid.

@maleahlock

6 жыл бұрын

Steve Haney You'll have to fight religious control first.

@stevehaney344

6 жыл бұрын

True

@MegaMech

6 жыл бұрын

Steve Haney that's a dumb idea. Third world countries require lots of children to support the family

@ivaningram5884

6 жыл бұрын

I used to think that, and that the world was doomed to be overpopulated. But in history, in both america and Britain for example, our populations boomed with technological advancements. Our economies grew and stabilized, as did the population growth rates. This is seen in almost all similar countries. Theres a name for the phenomena but idk it. Basically, third world countries are 100-200 years behind in certain terms, and are just now going through what we went through with the industrial revolution.

@duckwhistle

6 жыл бұрын

Unfortunately the US does the exact opposite of this, refusing to finance organizations that provide birth control.

Corona: Fine I'll do it myself

@yosefmacgruber1920

3 жыл бұрын

Why do you think that ControlYaVirus wants to do anything other than not exist? Evil mad-scientists should not be forming such harmful things.

@accessdenied5998

3 жыл бұрын

@@yosefmacgruber1920 for good to flurish evil must exist, for evil to flurish good must exist. That the way it is, would you rather World ending war or World Wide scale pandemic??

@yosefmacgruber1920

3 жыл бұрын

@@accessdenied5998 Whatever are you talking about? Some religious mumble-jumble? Yin and yang? Why do you ask me an obviously-false A/B dichotomy question? What was the option C that you thought you were so clever to omit?

@chessblunders6979

2 жыл бұрын

yes

@woodenhoe

2 жыл бұрын

@@chessblunders6979 I swear I misread your name as Cheeseburgers

Looks like they figured it out with releasing covid-19.

@kshak3125

3 жыл бұрын

The virus is fake to come with a solution... they figured it out with the ''RNA'' Vaccine (Pfizer, BioNtecht, AstraZeneca) it will make you sterile...

@consolewarfare5884

3 жыл бұрын

is the virus fake though? Maybe they scare us with a fake outbreak, but if it doesn't work then who's to say they dont release the real thing?

@beatlejuice7755

2 жыл бұрын

The next virus will be much worse

@ZAMIRFILMS

2 жыл бұрын

Top it with the Vaccine...

Education, better health especially infant mortality and better availability of birth control will do it. Richer countries tend to have lower birth rate, some below replacement rates.

@chadwickerman

6 жыл бұрын

Religion and machismo are huge obstacles to getting people to actually use birth control.

@v.sandrone4268

6 жыл бұрын

Tory Tatter amen ;-)

@KuraIthys

6 жыл бұрын

Global birthrates are already at roughly replacement rates on average. The problem is a change in birth rate's full consequences lag their cause by about 70 years. Our present situation is due to conditions in 1940-1950. The 2060-70 situation will be the consequences of the situation around 2000, after having removed the people born from about 1940 to 1990 from the picture. There are less older people because there were less younger people in the past. Our population isn't growing because of birth rates being above replacement as such. It's growing because relative to the size of our current younger generation, a decent chunk of the older generation is 'missing'. ... Because they were born in a different era where the global population was smaller, but birth rates were high. We are now in an era where global child population is stable, but the number of children is higher than it was. Thus, we are waiting for the proportional number of elderly people to catch up with the proportional number of younger people. Think about this: If 31.5 million children are born a year. (current birth rate, roughly) and they all live exactly 70 years, and we start from nothing (impossible, but let's assume that anyway...) Nobody dies to accident or disease. No variation in when people die. Everyone that's born lives 70 years. How big will the population be over time? Remember, this situation I just described is technically a neutral birth rate! (same number of people die as are born.) Well... Let's see: (numbers are millions of people.) Year 1: 31.5 million people Year 2: 31.5 + 31.5 million people. (63 million) Year 3: 94.5 million Year 4: 126 Year 5: 157.5 ... Year 10: 315 million. Year 20: 630 million Year 30: 945 million Year 50: 1,575 million. (1.5 billion) Year 70: 2,205 million. So far, things have been growing steadily, even though deaths = births, by definition in this example. But now see what happens next: Year 71: 2,205 million alive. 31.5 million are born. 31.5 million die. = no growth. Year 72: 2,205 million Year 73: 2,205 million etc. So why is the population going to hit 10 billion in 2050? ... Not because Births > Deaths But because we are currently in something that resembles year 10 or 20 of my example, NOT years 70+ The consequences simply haven't caught up with us yet, because deaths happen many years after births do. (Thus, we are 'missing'. about half of all the people over 30 that should exist based on how many children there were around the year 2000.... Technically that means the birth rate exceeds the death rate. But only until the people currently in their 30's die. Then things will stabilise. - assuming no other changes to birth or death rates.)

@1jimjon

6 жыл бұрын

V.S.: Nigeria + highest birth rate in the world + Boko Haram (translates as stop western education) + kill & kidnap if you try to educate women = Solution??

@maelgugi

6 жыл бұрын

Tory Tatter both can be fought with education

"Earth is the cradle of humanity, but one cannot live in a cradle forever." -Konstantin Tsiolkovsky

One major cause of overpopulation is that especially in the developing world, people found ways to stop people from dying due to better healthcare and reduced infant mortality, but didn’t find ways to control the unbridled growth that followed through education, family planning etc.

@bunney3272

5 жыл бұрын

Apple Pie Wrong, the fundamental issue is not a lack of land...it is a lack of resources and the socioeconomic repercussions that result from that

@xyeB

5 ай бұрын

I have no problem with Indian and Chinese people,you sound evil and racist. Family planning is evil. They should follow instincts

Ban excessive propaganda encouraging people to have children. Ban media that glamourizes pregnancy. Honour couples who don't and will never have children. Popularise adoption.

@BL-nf7ld

3 жыл бұрын

Or create a virus in a lab like Baxter labs did in 2009 and test it in the Ukraine where the victims lungs were filled with blood and turned black. Now they’re saying corona was made in wuhan lab. 1 luv ✊🏼

WE NEED BIRTH CONTROL PILLS FOR MEN ASAP!

@xyeB

5 ай бұрын

I disagree.

1:08 *_"Us, homo sapiens"_* No homo bro, speak for yourself.😅

@autorefresher1

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah! 💪😡

@AveryGuitar

3 жыл бұрын

... hetero sapiens?

Lower the birthrate eh? Why don't we start with the third world then?

@TheLastLogicalOne

6 жыл бұрын

Seth Bourgeois it's more about resource use. You and I use more than an entire 3rd world family.

@redacted6813

6 жыл бұрын

TheLastLogicalOne Ah but you see our lives actually do something whereas those in the third world only get Malaria and die and so on.

@trevor6607

6 жыл бұрын

Well Said Seth. Third world countries shit out more and more humans, which have little to no value add. They simply use more and more resources.

@CraftyZanTub

5 жыл бұрын

Get the third world to a point of low infant/child mortality, and birthrate will drop like a rock.

@themotivationauts2989

4 жыл бұрын

@@trevor6607 "Humans" are you an alien or something?

God they're going to purge me and other elders when I get older.

Very informative. TY for sharing.

Well a couple of years with nuclear war should solve that problem

@scottcartwright9008

5 жыл бұрын

No not a nuclear war there a better way

@Very-Uncorrect

5 жыл бұрын

@@scottcartwright9008 And what's that? I'll be taking notes!

@TLWinslow

4 жыл бұрын

You mean a couple of days? :)

@tparker2095

4 жыл бұрын

@@Very-Uncorrect People don't need to die, people just need to stop existing at this rate.

@k3qever413

4 жыл бұрын

@@Very-Uncorrect control ourselves

I think Hans Rosling did great showing the statistics of population, and it is more positive than what is mostly heard elsewhere.

Human race: Long live humans! Colonavirus: Hold my symptoms

@valksasss

4 жыл бұрын

It has a 2% fatality rate tho 👀

@soulassassin0g

4 жыл бұрын

I see the corona virus effected your brain, can't even spell it right anymore.

@jammytea4117

4 жыл бұрын

@@valksasss 1 month later and now its a 15% fatality rate, 20k deaths so far and over 400k cases worldwide, with a virus that infectious who knows if that number might not double within a months time.

@FlexAndFinancePeyton

4 жыл бұрын

Hahahaaaaaaaaaa

@FlexAndFinancePeyton

4 жыл бұрын

Silent Blades hold my beer: 1million people

FYI, in actual life, Carrick (the broccoli guy) is even MORE awkward.

start an epidemic.

@leeardamer

6 жыл бұрын

The government did ebola

@yosefmacgruber1920

6 жыл бұрын

Why? Who says that human population growth is bad? I am very pro-life. I believe it very good for human populations to be growing. It is all the more beautiful and amazing people who can experience life. Besides, humans are created in the image of God, so that insures that human life is something very special and sacred.

@yosefmacgruber1920

5 жыл бұрын

@@benme2253 Having a more human-dense world, is such an obvious solution that educated idiots miss considering the possible benefits of a human-denser world? For one thing, it makes birth control appear all the more unnecessary. No need for schemes nor deception nor coercion pushing for unwanted birth control. Why not simply put people into more places, and allow for human populations to naturally accumulate as they may?

@yosefmacgruber1920

4 жыл бұрын

@roseix lights Actually, currently 7.8 billion. I agree with you that the world population is growing really big. However, I do not agree that it is too big, nor do I see your paltry-small number of 10 billion as being any sort of "max". What makes you think that 10B is the max?

@yosefmacgruber1920

4 жыл бұрын

@roseix lights So why do _YOU_ think the world population has grown so huge? Aren't there probably very good reasons for it to be so huge?

1:43 Dude's like going to take a dump in the middle of a reportage! 😂

One way is to take a rather rewarding approach, by giving child-less couples tax cuts, free pension, cheap health care/pharma, etc... 2nd way is to popularize the culture of minimalism, moderate consumption, recycling, re-using, repairing, borrowing/trading, and collectivism. The best method is to eliminate/lower poverty in impoverished countries and make people busy with finishing higher education, more advanced/time consuming jobs, well paid jobs. For this, japan is a great example, where people are so work oriented that they cant afford the time to have kids.

@OGPatriot03

6 жыл бұрын

The way to do NO.1 is to eliminate socialism. No more free healthcare and education from people. Then they'll have less children and people without said children will be "rewarded" by paying significantly less in taxes, they'll get raises because the business will pay less etc etc.

@TheLastLogicalOne

6 жыл бұрын

If have children became more expensive do you think it might just add more value to having children. Like buying an expensive TV or car?

@motherjoon

6 жыл бұрын

No no, the opposite. Babies are already massive time/life/effort/love/$ consumers.

@broadbandtogod

5 жыл бұрын

+motherjoon Holy smokes you are right! I love this idea so much

@sambarbosa6453

2 жыл бұрын

We need to stop fucking… bottom line…

Funny how those who talk of the over-consumption are those who have the most money/lavish lifestyles/work for the interests of those who do.

@yosefmacgruber1920

2 жыл бұрын

They fly in their rich elitists' jets, to some fake "climate change" conference, and then have the nerve to wonder why we do not believe their fake-science BS.

Preventing is better than killing or poor quality of life. Even if I want to, I won't be having kids because of this problem - and I know many other couples feel the same ...that may help a little bit

It's time to decrease the population

@catguy4996

3 жыл бұрын

And I think China has tried to do that with Covid19

human are already limiting population economically ---- by raising household and land prices -- thus limiting the desire to raise babies.

Yes, we can. Do like the Chinese did: mandate a Zero Child Law. There is nothing physically stopping ANY nation from doing that.

@yosefmacgruber1920

5 жыл бұрын

The people generally do not like and tend to not respect bad laws. Know you nothing of law theory? Laws can not just be arbitrary, or they cause the people and the country to suffer needlessly. Zero or 1 child per family, is not reasonable, not practical, and violates human rights and human dignity. Families come in all sizes.

@yusufdunphy5402

4 жыл бұрын

How about a zero child law for those who are of the following three at the same time: poor, uneducated, and not married

@yosefmacgruber1920

4 жыл бұрын

@@yusufdunphy5402 So you are saying that it is okay to be "with child" and not ever having been married, if you are rich or are educated? Or that the poor and uneducated have less need of having children? Doesn't that reek of fake-science eugenics theory or something? If you are married, then you should have however many children. If not married, you should not be having sex. Thus, no need for awful harsh contraceptive-pushing subsidies.

@yusufdunphy5402

4 жыл бұрын

Yosef MacGruber This is not me saying that it’s ok to have a child when un-married. I’m saying especially for someone who are the three at the same time. I would be fine with married couples who are in poverty or under-educated to have children because at least they don’t break apart like their Un-married counterparts in the two same situations. Of course regardless if the unmarried couples are rich or poor, educated or not, they’re better off not having children until they get married.

@yosefmacgruber1920

4 жыл бұрын

@@yusufdunphy5402 More people should be getting married and producing children. Fewer people should be in poverty and fewer people should be uneducated. The rampant birth control does not help in solving these problems, but rather is a distraction that contributes to those problems. People were meant to multiply naturally without any birth control to hinder our progress.

WHOLLY BALLS this dude is dark and blunt about it... Also that man in bed looks traumatized... WHAT WERE YOU DOING TO HIM, HOST? :

@DomBurgess

6 жыл бұрын

Ha ha! Nothing bad, I promise - I was simply turning off the lamp! :)

Well having less babies , also getting pregnant at 16 has a extreem impact. 1 new baby per human per 16years , or 20 to 25 years ( that makes a big difference ). africa, asia and south america are the biggest problems here. and having less babies has nothing to do with human rights , the right to survive is more important. before we consume the world like a cancer !

@MauroTamm

6 жыл бұрын

It is a problem of human rights with forced sterilisation. You physically cripple the person for life.

@yosefmacgruber1920

6 жыл бұрын

So why do you poo-poo human rights as if it is not important? Having a lower human population does little or nothing towards helping people to survive. You might want to rethink all that, for you seem to be making a lot of logical mistakes.

@sammytheusername6818

4 жыл бұрын

or just have a kid at like 40 if u want there problem solved

There should be a limit on the amount of kids people are allowed to have if they want to have more they should pay. This would make it possible to provide enough resources for basic human needs.

Trying to control overpopulation it's the consequence of a system failing to control over consumption. It's a formula based on both variables, yet the media seems to ignore one of them, because it is not profitable to end overconsumption when you're a big corporation

@v.sandrone4268

6 жыл бұрын

1 first world family consumes more than a third world village. The raw numbers are not the full story.

@MauroTamm

6 жыл бұрын

We aren't even particularly over consuming. Just wasteful - stores or farms alone discard insane amounts of goods. Over packing stuff, planned obsolescence, poor distribution, limited investment in technologies for lab grown meat, alternative fuels, energy and food production. We still use heavily polluting materials for basic stuff (batteries - heavy metals, old nuclear power waste, oil, coal for example)

@jc918a-32

6 жыл бұрын

"We aren't even particularly over consuming. Just wasteful" Wasteful is the very definition of overconsumption

@jc918a-32

6 жыл бұрын

Yeah' that's what I just said. If we were to judge who should leave Earth, based solely on consumption, we'd get rid of 1st world countries. If we were to judge based solely on population, we'd get rid of 3rd world countries. But I want to think we know that's not the answer (contrary to what I'm reading in some extremely creepy comments)

@MauroTamm

6 жыл бұрын

Not the same. Bulk of the wasting happens before it reaches consumers to consume. Only choosing best fruits/vegetables or letting whole fields to rot because harvesting would cost more than the sale value would be worth etc.

Seriously I think limiting families to having just two children could help things and a lot of people tend to neglect their children and a lot of children end up in foster care.

Corona vaccine; Fine I will do it myself.

Mosquitoes were neutered to avoid deseases by eliminating the baby mosquitoes. Can humans do the same?

Don’t kill people just alot of people need to stop giving birth 🤰

@samben6597

4 жыл бұрын

the problem with one child policy like china, they ended up having more old people only collecting pensions and pensions are usually free tax money, they need more young work force and tax payers, thats why recently they expanded to two child policy

@thepickle3201

4 жыл бұрын

sam ben maybe just don’t go over 3 kids

@samben6597

4 жыл бұрын

@@thepickle3201 personally i dont have kids and i dont plan to have any, im 34. To me they are just a liability and nothing more , this is personal. In the comment i was talking in general, unfortunately we still see people having too many kids and cant take care of them properly. Results are: poverty, uneducated, crime rise....

@thepickle3201

4 жыл бұрын

sam ben oh um I’m a kid Myself I’m only 12 but I Totally understand we’re your coming from 😐

@anthonypiacentini3367

3 жыл бұрын

Which is why I'm pro choice

Tax increases after two children, or only having free support for the first child would create a disincentive for having many. Or it may just become a status symbol of weath to have more.

@kylek1556

2 жыл бұрын

You’re pure evil

We do not YET know if the gravity on Mars is strong enough to prevent the bone loss seen on the ISS and trips to the moon. The accomplishments made by cosmonauts and astronauts is not sufficient for traditional human work.

This should be the NUMBER ONE. Concern for all of us NOW . HAVING A CHILD SHOULD BE AN EARNED PRIVALEGE NOT A RIGHT. Certainly having unwanted children MUST STOP.

In this world i'm proud to not have kids!

@DamnItMantis

4 жыл бұрын

Me too! I prefer pets anyway. Cats and horses!

@alanli3631

4 жыл бұрын

Childbirth is painful anyway.

@muhammad_dzaki

3 жыл бұрын

Well you can adopt a baby and torture him/her to decrease the population

@FullFledged2010

3 жыл бұрын

@@muhammad_dzaki 🤦‍♂️

No-child policy

Chinas 1 child rule sounds great

-Limit 2. After that mandatory law ordered tube ties for both man/woman covered by insurance or face massive fines, possible jail time , public scrutiny and humiliation . We are too soft as a society. Stop making children you can’t afford and living off the government.

I think by educating more people especially girl child and by making people realize that over population is a very big problem.

Epic battle royal tournament for our amusement!

@llawliet165

5 жыл бұрын

giovanni d'abrosca hahahahahaha

The woman who has had like over 20 children on this morning. That was wrong. No one needs to have that many. It's about choices. Don't have children if you can't afford them by binging off the government/tax payers money.

@carissat5177

6 жыл бұрын

Thankyou, it makes me wonder why the government supports people who have children. I wonder if they make a profit after payments, healthcare and education costs come out.

@jamesmmm98

6 жыл бұрын

Liam Geoghegan my boyfriend (19yearsold) is the eldest of 13 children the youngest is 3 they are one of the biggest famlies in Ireland at the moment they are all well cared for and do not receive a cent off the government. Not all big family's are the problem it's some of the sinister pricks that bring children into the world for profit.

@LJGrindewald

6 жыл бұрын

Jamez M see. If the family are wealthy and can afford to have that many children it's fine :) I've no problem with it but if they sponge off the government it's wrong.

@jamesmmm98

6 жыл бұрын

Liam Geoghegan they are by no means wealthy. It's the sharing and love that gets them by.

@yosefmacgruber1920

6 жыл бұрын

Which of those 20 children are not worthy of life? Of course all 20 children are worthy of life, because human life is beautiful, something really special, and sacred. Also, huge numbers of people have objections to all methods of birth control, so as a pro-lifer, I have no objections to people having so incredibly many children. Babies happen, and humans are supposed to multiply naturally without birth control to hinder our progress. BTW, I do not believe in government welfare, but rather, charity should be voluntary and by organizations and from people who wish to give. And we can get our "free" education via home schooling or internet schooling. Abolish the unjust property and income taxes, and allow parents to use the money that they save once those bad unjust taxes are abolished, to pay tuition to the school of their choice. Or home-school or charity-school or internet-school.

if people dont stop having kids ima have to become thanos

@yosefmacgruber1920

2 жыл бұрын

Why not just have a human-denser earth? Why do you blame parents? Did you yourself have no parents? Married people could just keep their pants zipped, but everybody just laughs at any so-obvious solution to their non-problem?

NOW GET THE BOOSTER SHOT

How about people adopt kids instead of having them through sex? Also, good ol' war would do some good!

@mikeskylark1594

4 жыл бұрын

Exactly! This is what I'm preaching all my life basically! (refering to the first sentence, not the second)

@soulassassin0g

4 жыл бұрын

Well sex is natural and everyone at some point will experience it. If anything we can have all the males get vasectomies so they don't accidentally get a female pregnant.

@wildwebx

4 жыл бұрын

killing people will increase the population. Thats what happen in pour region. they want to mazimize their kids chance of survival. Instead help the poor countries. Educate them.

I for one volunteer to go to mars

Please take me to space!

Maybe we should stop acting like adults who don't decide to have children are weird.

@DamnItMantis

4 жыл бұрын

Agreed.

lets pray for the coming generation. am wondering how it would be

WWIII?

reduce humanity by 90%

Believe the numbers. Believe everything they tell you. They would never lie to you. Why would they?

Turn people into energy.

@johnnihil1689

4 жыл бұрын

Absolutely. Euthanize then fertilize.

@wildwebx

4 жыл бұрын

recycle humans, what a great idea!

@milkncookie

4 жыл бұрын

We talking Soylent Green or The Matrix?

To expect constant growth, whether it’s in the economy or the population is unsustainable. We don’t need to kill anyone. We need to stop having 6 or more children per family. That’s the most selfish thing any couple can do.

@MirellaDerks

4 жыл бұрын

It's indeed selfish to have 6 or more children per family. If those 6 kids eventually have 6 kids too, than there would be 36 people in the next generation. That's so not going to work to decrease population growth. When continuing doing the math I even have to conclude that it's selfish to have 2 or more children per family. As the counter still will go up if the next generation continues in the same pattern. This is why I understand China and it's drastic measures. The way they did it and are still doing it isn't very compassionate but they knew something needed to be done. If they would have done nothing, the Chinese population would have gone through even a bigger hell. Based on the actions of human kind, I have the impression people seem to be mostly short-term "happiness" thinkers and consider the long-term future as less important. Could this maybe be our main problem?

@monke2251

3 жыл бұрын

@@MirellaDerks 2 children per couple would be more appropriate as they would simply be replacing their parents in the near future Naturally there will be some who'd have one or no child ,kinda reducing the numbers China has removed it's one child policy because there's not enough in the younger generation

@vkrgfan

3 жыл бұрын

Two children is so far the closest to sustainable number because two parents so they need at least one young person to take care of elderly. Though majority of Westerners send their elderly to a nursing homes and hoping that immigrants from 3rd world countries will take a good care of them.

@MrMam-yo7qp

2 жыл бұрын

Bruh I am one of my mothers 6 children and she’s a great mother Don you have children? My mother is quite religious and she says god says, it’s great to have many children Something like that. If you’re trying to say, that my mother is a bad and selfish person, then you’re wrong, and you can leave this comment section. Look, I know what you’re trying to say and I understand, but I just don’t like you insulting my mother

@yosefmacgruber1920

2 жыл бұрын

@@MirellaDerks I am very pro-life, also a person of faith in God, so I see nothing wrong with having 36 grandchildren, when God so clearly commanded people to multiply. I have always been in favor of human population growth, so that more people may experience life, and because every human life is of immense value and sacred. Also, huge numbers of people have various objections against birth control that I find to be quite valid and easy to understand. People who do not use any means of birth control, can sometimes have as many as 6 children, right? I am not some evil Malthusian, so I have to disagree with your baseless assertion that a China without cruel population control would somehow be worse.

Where is a page where I can see the sources?

my noga need to fix that belt buckle tho

good old fashion world war would clear some spaces up, not the nuclear kind, earth still has to be liveable

@RonanB99

6 жыл бұрын

Nukey ahh wishing for a third world war...

@waltermarlin1730

6 жыл бұрын

So you want to send grandma and grandpa to fight WWIII?

@MauroTamm

6 жыл бұрын

It makes things worse - usually the healthy, young population is the war victim. So you just increase the percentage of elderly who need young people to survive.

@yosefmacgruber1920

5 жыл бұрын

@Jesse Mitchell There is no need for population control, and no there is *NOT* way too many people. Families come in all sizes, and it is so very wrong to discriminate against naturally-large families.

@yosefmacgruber1920

5 жыл бұрын

@Jesse Mitchell Yes, I know, the world population is beautiful blossoming in its size, like some preparation for something great. But which of all these people are unnecessary? Can we get rid of India and China, so that we can have some more room to grow? Maybe your family-tribe can be smaller, so that mine can be bigger? What is to be accomplished via such non-productive fake-science "overpopulation" bickering? We had to double, because so many people apparently want babies and to grow their families. Some family planning pusher warned some African village, that at their current rate, they would double in 25 years. To which they all started clapping. Oops, somebody forgot to explain to them, why certain educated idiots in the West, consider such natural growth to be "bad" for some reason. You think that village elders do not realize that the village is growing bigger, and that neighboring villages are doing the same, and the distance between the cities and towns, is slowly and steadily shrinking, and that each year, there is more and more people in the country? Where are all these people coming from? Well if the neighbors are friendly, then what really is the problem? People naturally think that their rising population is probably good, or at least inevitable. The income tax is unjust, and tax refunds are deserved, because the people were overcharged and had too much money withheld. And there are numerous ways of looking at it, if you really think that some tiny tax credit for having more children, somehow encourages more childbearing, then it perhaps is a "quantity discount" for bringing many more "future taxpayers into the world". Or the government pretending to be somewhat family-friendly. And if she won't work, then why is she paying taxes? Isn't being a Mom serious work? I agree that we should not have to pay for other people's children, however, many large families are about as self-sufficient as anybody else. A lot of people obviously do not believe in pulling out, and many people actually do appear to want possibly big families. Humans were designed to reproduce naturally, without using any means of birth control. Do you deny that?

The hunger games .....😂

Where is thanos when you need him🙄

Can you give me the original text of this video? Thank you.

As people become satisfied that their basic needs are going to be met, they start having fewer children, and in some areas, the population growth rate has even gone negative. The key to doing this, which was not even touched on, is by increasing the quality of life for most everyone on the plant - partly by conserving resources and partly by smart planning and partly by increasing the carrying capacity. In the short term, family planning and contraceptives are also key technologies. BBC, you fell flat on your face on this one.

1. birth control at early age mandatory 2. Family planning in school 3. improve the quality of life and standard of living for developing countries. Poor people spend less and contribute less to the economy, and have more time for sex cause its free... 4. allow death with dignity

@yosefmacgruber1920

5 жыл бұрын

Babies are cute. You were once a baby. Anti-baby makes no sense.

@Very-Uncorrect

5 жыл бұрын

@@yosefmacgruber1920 No, babies are weak, ugly and idiotic. It makes so much sense.

@Very-Uncorrect

5 жыл бұрын

@@yosefmacgruber1920 Babies are walking 2 years after birth, other animals are killing their prey by 3 months old.

@yosefmacgruber1920

5 жыл бұрын

@@Very-Uncorrect Why pick on babies who can not defend themselves? Why not pick on yourself and off yourself then? Are you disputing what I said about all humans being weak? When you look in the mirror, why aren't you disgusted with yourself? Did you read the part where I wrote that some ugly alien could pick you up and squash you like a bug? And it wouldn't even take much pressure. You are not even strong enough to lift a car. Some babies are walking in just a year. And in fact, I think babies could walk a little sooner. If we would let them. But what happens? Baby falls down and cries, and so we pick up our baby and comfort him or her. We in effect tell our babies, "It is okay, you do not have to walk today." I have a theory that if a baby has enough strength, and somehow became determined enough, he or she could say to him or herself, "I will walk today. I see other people doing it, I can do it also." And the baby will not accept no for an answer. Fall down, get up, fall down, get up and walk again, try try and try again, walking today. But that doesn't so much get at the point you are making about why a baby isn't walking the same day as his or her birth. For one thing, babies have over-sized heads, and their muscles are too weak to support its weight. In the womb, where the baby was floating, it did not take so much effort. Muscles are not going to become strong in just 1 day. It takes some time. But you are conveniently ignoring my point, that it appears to be *BY DESIGN* that human babies are weak. For a purpose.

@theia1653

4 жыл бұрын

Make the IUD mandatory for every girl at 11-12.

Wow! I had no idea how bad overpopulation has gotten! Why aren't more governments stopping this unsustainable growth??

@SinghAujla99z

2 жыл бұрын

So you mean stopping population by killing people

Developing countries have too many children. Government intervention is required

I love how they use a young white couple when talking about not making people

@filipportman5981

3 жыл бұрын

Right-wing white nationalist SJWs LOVE to bring race into every topic, then they blame the left!

@filipportman5981

3 жыл бұрын

@Bobby Bob I know but too late because he already did. Their utter hypocrisy annoys me so much however.

@vkrgfan

3 жыл бұрын

I’ve noticed that too, they do the same with advertisement of fertility app, they show demographic of women of different ages who maybe interested in getting pregnant so they portrayed 18-25 as black girl and 34-40 as white woman. It’s pretty racist in my opinion, but I’m glad you caught that.

@sinisadencic8277

2 жыл бұрын

Why then in Europe, Australia and North America are population declining?

@sinisadencic8277

2 жыл бұрын

My country is lost around 80% population and our living standard also declined because of that. It is like we moved into dark age.

Here because of Thanos' ideology.

The question is not can we control it, but do we have the courage to?

@yosefmacgruber1920

6 жыл бұрын

There is no need to control human population growth. We humans are intelligent and should be expected to adapt to our rising numbers.

Human over population : i am inevitable

AI might fix it all. However, WE might not like how AI fixes overpopulation. Watch Elon talk about AI.

When America can use only 3% of its population for agriculture to supply 10 times more food then we could ever hope to eat, topped off with 1st world country habits of having a lower birth rate in the country then the recommended country population resupply birth rate recommendations, so such a degree that even Japan has a "Virgin Crises" where not enough people are being born to replace the aging population, while 3rd world countries that are the source of massive population gains these days turn first world and start to have their birth rates decline slowly as well, in conjunction with their ever improving healthcare and food production, what you are going to actually see is a sort of anti-overpopulation self control that takes place without willful human intervention. Government interference in the bedroom really is unnecessary. If resources are such a huge deal when it comes to the older generations, then start by giving them solar panels. Their generation also had a lot stronger focus on self sufficiency, so help them with a food based greenhouse as well since a lot of them are in fact veggy garden savvy and place a lot of importance on the taste of fresh food. and if water is the final issue, then you shouldn't have any problems making huge Distillation style Desalination plants pumping massive amounts of newly freshed water from the sea. Don't give me the "Desalination is expensive" argument, Distillation is about boiling water to the point of turning it into vapor and that can still be an easy method done in mass to desalinate fresh water out of salt water. Any left over minerals from this can be caught in a gridded mesh and moved out of the distillation tank to harvest the minerals collected on the metal grids. On top of that, one of these days, enough people are going to get fet-up with drout situations, where people are going to demand government projects that do pipe billions of gallons of desalinized sea water up threw the country, so eventually some government agency at some point in time is going to finally pay the expanse to make massive desalination plants that can pump billions of gallons of freshwater desalinized from the ocean, even if the only option is to use a distillation method using giant containers that used Osmium Alloys to make. Help 3rd world nations become first world nations and their birth rates will decline simply as a matter of 1st world nation habits. Refocus more effort on renewable energy and resources. The old folks wanted to retire in comfort without anything to worry about, so let them not have to worry about power, water and food by letting them have those renewable abilities. They can't be a drain on resources, if they are not consuming them, right? How can they consume precious limited resources, if they have their own renewing cycle of resources?

It’s a cool topic but scary

It does bring up some interesting ethical questions

@maelgugi

6 жыл бұрын

Afternoon Tea Yeah. Like am I so entitled that I'll rather kill other person than lower my already too high living standards?

Whenever people start talking about "overpopulation" the first thing they do is start talking about how to "reduce the global birth rate" or how to kill people. The thing is, people in the US and Europe use *far* more resources than the people in Africa, Asia, and Latin America do. The solution isn't limiting or killing the people in these places since they're barely contributing to the problem in the first place. It's not even about reducing the population in Europe and America. It's about reducing their consumption and not being so incredibly wasteful and inefficient. Americans throw away more than half of the food they purchase. Americans have more empty homes than homeless people. The problem is not one of abundance, but of distribution.

@leeardamer

6 жыл бұрын

Why do people need millions of new iPhones manufactured and shipped every year bro? Little things like this are a waste that not enough people are addressing for it to changeI've had the same Samsung S6 for ages now, doesn't always work at its best performance but this is my own fault, and there's no need to buy a new one for a curved screen, that's just greed for the sake of being trendy...

@voidface8827

6 жыл бұрын

Now this is something I can get behind! And if we are less meat (no I'm not telling everyone to go vegan, hear me out) we would have more space to grow crops for human consumption and we could possibly give some of that away to countries in need.

@MauroTamm

6 жыл бұрын

We already discard wast amounts of crops. Just having more land wont change that. Also most farmed animals take little farmable land fit for growing quality human food - the soil can only grow basic grass for example - and with all the anti GMO hate, you cannot even engineer crops to grow there.

@voidface8827

6 жыл бұрын

Mauro Tamm Yeah okay good point.

@KuraIthys

6 жыл бұрын

Much of that waste isn't people at home wasting food. Throwing out food because it's spoiled or you made too much or something is maybe a few percent of total wastage. The bulk of the problem is the retailers, and our buying habits. It's shops being extremely fussy about what they'll sell. Apples that aren't shiny enough get dumped. Bananas that are too curved or too straight get tossed. Vegetables that are forked get tossed. And of course, rather than give this 'unsellable' food away to people who are going hungry, it gets dumped somewhere and left to rot. It's ridiculous. Including waste we grow food for about 12 billion people. Not CAN. we ARE growing that much food. And that's including the inefficiencies of meat production. (It's not as simple by the way as saying less meat means being able to grow more crops. At least some fraction of meat production is done using grazing land that cannot sustain crops. - but it's not enough for current demand. Such land use is maybe 25% or less of meat production.) If we grow food for 12 billion, have a world population of 7 billion. (or is it 8 now?) yet 2 billion are starving, that means somewhere along the way enough food is currently wasted to feed 7 billion people!

It's hard for something to be valuable and appreciated when there are 8 billion of it.

How did he make a house of cards upside down

Unpopular opinion : Serial killers actually helping overpopulation issues

This is sad..

I do know that many people in my country don't want to have children including myself. I say we limit the amount of children an individual can have. Of course don't force it on them since it's oppressive but instead make it so that they want to have less children.

Only 108 deaths per minute 😔😔😔☹️☹️☹️ We have to improve these numbers 👀👀

7:13 Better idea will be to transport all criminals to space instead of prisons.

I was very surprised that one of the more immediate solutions wasn't mentioned; reduce the amount of resources each individual consumes.

Stop rewarding people for having more children. Reward people for having less. Taxes. People who get welfare know as do immigrants that if you keep having a child every few years you get more welfare money and food stamps, it doesn't matter if they are on drugs. This should be changed.

What about all the flora and fauna on this planet? If mankind leaves behind a barren earth and goes off into space to seek new frontiers will animals be taken along too? Or will they be eaten before that? What will this planet look like when there is no more wildlife left? When there will only be humans and livestock.

Simple government policy change. Make all childcare, medical bills and education free for the firstborn child in addition to generous income tax breaks for the parents. But make the policy increasingly less accommodating for subsequent offspring. Additionally ban immigration from countries that don' t adopt the policy.

I think the topic of this video was off. A much more interesting question is, are we using up earth's resources too quickly and is there enough to go around? Personally I find the threat of overpopulation a dubious one, because it's not even a threat unless you can answer the aforementioned question.

1:55 not enough of us are dying. Says it all really BBC. Why should we play God and more to the point...who?

@Reactivate100

2 жыл бұрын

Nuremberg 2

@V01DIORE

2 жыл бұрын

Does the gambled imposition of a life for selfishness and ignorance not near “playing god”?

We need Samuel L Jackson's plan from Kingsman

Stop worrying about it. Nobody should be "eliminating" anybody else.

@xyeB

5 ай бұрын

This

Close your legs!

1. Encourage people to have children after the age of 30. 2. Promote anti-natalism. Honour couples who choose to remain childless. 3. Educate people that they aren't royalty. It's okay if their family progeny doesn't move forward.

You heard him : not enough of us are dying Can you just stop living please .?!

All of humanity could fit in the top of Florida !

Access to birth control, family planning and sex education can actually control population in developing world..Also women empowerment is crucial. Investing into women's education and empowerment has proved to be effective in many parts of India and Bangladesh.

@yosefmacgruber1920

2 жыл бұрын

Why not simply allow and advocate that the world needs to grow human-denser? There are no pleasant scenarios by which human population can reduce. So why even think such evil anti-people nonsense?

@johngrosser4179

2 жыл бұрын

You are right but public opinion must be curbed first. We Indians are compelled by society and parents to reproduce and promoted by the female sex mainly. Jhn

@yosefmacgruber1920

2 жыл бұрын

@@johngrosser4179 Is public opinion just Silly Puddy to be molded into whatever is fashionable? I already do not watch TV because it is filled with lies. As a pro-lifer I very much agree with people getting married, producing families, welcoming however many children that God gives. Birth control was an anti-family heresy and very much against nature. People were right to distrust it.

@johngrosser4179

2 жыл бұрын

@@yosefmacgruber1920 I am not either side of the fence. I have kept my promise two and no more. ( no increase no decrease) I love to live healthy and promote healthy living n eating.(organic) I am retired and advised my children2. Family planning methods like the pill could cause illness oral precaution could be very tricky 2. Having sex orally could cause deformity in the male sexual organ if the foreskin gets ruptured n inflamed and begins to close then operation circumcision is the only alternative. as it's not natural. The world is trying out lot of methods. The important factor is I am leaving this world as it was without inconvenincing any one. 2day mainstream media is not worth a penny...Stay blessed warrior jhn

@yosefmacgruber1920

2 жыл бұрын

@@johngrosser4179 Your promise to whom? Nature hardly needs for you to keep your family size "under control". The Bible says to take responsibility for our families/children, but does not expect us to try to somehow limit them. If you had 6 children, I am fine with that, because I am pro-life and I am very much against population control. The world has 8 billion people they claim, why does anybody think that a few more children is going to hurt anything? Every human life is of immense value and sacred, thus we are obliged to find or make room for everybody, now matter how many that God may allow. Most people laugh at or ignore enviro-wacko "stop at 2" nonsense. Not realistic and contrary to human rights and dignity. Sure, "artificial" methods have bad side-effects. I accept readily arguments against "artificial" methods. But I do not advocate natural methods either. Sure, the world balks, too much self-control needed. Having naturally-big families still is a proper and natural option, and God commands people to multiply. Also means as I see it, gives us permission to. Ultra-orthodox Jews tend to have big families, because they take very seriously Genesis 38 where Onan spilling his seed went badly for him. I largely agree with this pro-life view, best to allow babies to happen and not to spill our seed. Marriage first, then babies. Living healthy should include not polluting our bodies with nasty harsh contraceptives, also respecting our natural reproductive rhythms and welcoming our children to come to life as they may or as God allows. Our ancestors allowed for babies to conceive and generally did not try to prevent it. Sex is supposed to be for procreation. Quite many people believe that the very real prospect of pregnancy or yet another pregnancy should be allowed for, so that sex is not profaned into but a selfish and carnal act. I believe this also and count it among my many objections against birth control. Also, birth control is contrary to nature and quite awkward. I am for only male circumcision as that is biblical, and according to a friend of my Dad's as he told me, circumcised as an adult, it enhances sensation. That would seem to be good. Oral sex seems wrong, because it is contrary to procreation. The human seed is supposed to go to where babies can happen, and sex is for _married_ couples, as was accepted before the rampant contraceptive pushing promoting irresponsibility. Also, why have that around teeth? Seems like a very bad idea. Only but the one reproductive orifice is designed to receive the male organ. I reject the "family planning" anti-family propaganda, which was hugely based upon fake-science racism and eugenics and pushed by filthy-rich evil elitists. Historically, naturally, biblically, humans seem designed to multiply naturally, and it is best to let God determine our family size.

Hasn't the overpopulation argument been repeatedly debunked?

@yosefmacgruber1920

6 жыл бұрын

Liberal leftists are sore losers. They quite often also do not know what they are talking about. So we must debunk their stupid anti-people anti-family arguments, again and again, because they are such slow learners. No wonder they are so often called liberal-retards or libtards for short.

last one was the best option

The problem is not the population but the misuse and waste of resources. The broken thing is the common concept of wealth.