Conversations with History: Gary Becker

(Visit: www.uctv.tv/) Conversations host Harry Kreisler welcomes Nobel Laureate Gary S. Becker for a discussion of his intellectual journey. Topics covered in the conversation include: the influence of his parents, his education, Milton Friedman, his early work on discrimination, the skills and temperament required for work in economics, applying economic analysis to social problems, the Chicago school of economics, creativity, rational choice theory, markets vs. government, the impact of ideas on policy, the communications revolution, the lessons of the 2008 economic collapse, and advice for students preparing for the future. Series: "Conversations with History" [5/2013] [Business] [Show ID: 25071]

Пікірлер: 22

  • @tomrhee1
    @tomrhee110 жыл бұрын

    I am sorry that he is gone. He was one of my favorite teachers in Chicago. He could have lived a little longer.

  • @tuckerbugeater

    @tuckerbugeater

    Жыл бұрын

    it's all about you

  • @duskonanyavarld1786
    @duskonanyavarld17869 жыл бұрын

    Rest in peace, You will be missed.

  • @abouderazsofiane804
    @abouderazsofiane8048 ай бұрын

    A great mind.

  • @markr7083
    @markr7083 Жыл бұрын

    Stingers up!

  • @shubhaghosh
    @shubhaghosh9 жыл бұрын

    Good

  • @jackjackthompson5771
    @jackjackthompson57713 жыл бұрын

    Montreal represent!

  • @smshahriar997
    @smshahriar9977 жыл бұрын

    a great intellectual

  • @nurlatifahmohdnor8939
    @nurlatifahmohdnor89392 жыл бұрын

    I hope somebody translate "Che Bek" story for you.

  • @maxgame4811
    @maxgame48113 жыл бұрын

    Non si finisce mai di studiare altrimenti cadi per terra 🤔🍃

  • @marcogarrido3781
    @marcogarrido37813 жыл бұрын

    He seemed to be very humble and down to earth, is ssd he's gone.. To bad his theory was the opposite and it's the definition of delusional, going to show that Nobel in Economics is most of times awarded for political and ideological reasons, not because true cientific achievements.

  • @IsaacDarcheMusic
    @IsaacDarcheMusic6 жыл бұрын

    social choices are a function of individual choices. Therefore, individual choices are a function of social choices. If social choices are intransitive, then individual choices are as well. Therefore, rational choice theory is not rational, or even coherent in its own terms.

  • @karimal-mradi4425

    @karimal-mradi4425

    6 жыл бұрын

    all you just typed was a mess of jargon. Stop trying to sound smart and start trying to sound clear.

  • @Faustus_de_Reiz

    @Faustus_de_Reiz

    2 жыл бұрын

    You can have interdependent preferences and choice matrices. Also you can have institutional feedback effects within your preference matrices under neoclassical or rational choice models. You don't know the literature well enough to make an informed comment... So shut up

  • @IsaacDarcheMusic
    @IsaacDarcheMusic6 жыл бұрын

    There is no nobel prize for economics, only the bank of Sweden prize

  • @Wolcik3000

    @Wolcik3000

    5 жыл бұрын

    could you elaborate?

  • @shane_rm1025

    @shane_rm1025

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@Wolcik3000 The Bank funds the prize but the winner is still picked by an independent committee of experts chosen by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences same as the prizes in physics and chemistry, it's just not sponsored by the original endowment.

  • @swaggboymcgee210

    @swaggboymcgee210

    3 ай бұрын

    ​@@shane_rm1025still a PR move to increase the standing of the economics profession

  • @IsaacDarcheMusic
    @IsaacDarcheMusic6 жыл бұрын

    economic forecasts are always wrong by unacceptable margins. Therefore economics should not guide policy. Keep your beautiful abstractions to yourself.

  • @yellowusbrickus4821

    @yellowusbrickus4821

    10 ай бұрын

    Think of economists like doctors for the economy. Medicine and diagnosis may not be perfect, but it is prudent to listen to your doctor.

  • @swaggboymcgee210

    @swaggboymcgee210

    3 ай бұрын

    ​@@yellowusbrickus4821 Except when economists have an ideological inclination towards certain "diagnoses"