Faizan sir, Best video ever watched.....The Hindu mai Editorial likho ispe.... Yaha sirf students padhte hai The Hindu to sare intellectuals padhate hai
@dikshant35724 жыл бұрын
बहुत ही सुन्दर ढंग से समझाया हैं। धन्यवाद आपका
@sekharkatiki3774 жыл бұрын
Prof Mustafa ! Your talks are always insightful and very enriching. One small request from those who can't understand Hindi and those who can understand Hindi at a broader level and miss the details: It would be very helpful to have English sub-titles to these videos.
@kamilraza87224 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir...i was desperately waiting for this topic...
@shamshadakram20964 жыл бұрын
Jb. Faizan Mustafa hamare Mother - e - watan mein "Qanoon ki kitab"ki tarah hain jise hamein Padhne ki zarurat hai......!! Thanks KZread video.
@gazalakhanable4 жыл бұрын
Always your lectures enlighten me thank you so much
@srgarmentsjeans19784 жыл бұрын
Very good 👍 analysis for justice political, social and economic eguallity for everyone civilians of India.
@sandeepyadav-fw3oj4 жыл бұрын
Thanks you sir for your effort , please give your insight on difference between equality before law and equal protection of law.
@SubhajitSarkar45434 жыл бұрын
Itne assechhe ap explain kartehe ki koi confusion hi nehi rehtehe. Great work sir 🙏
@benudharmahanand55523 жыл бұрын
Respected sir, Thank you so much for enlight us
@kishorewalanju98824 жыл бұрын
very good researched lecture .
@nirmalchoudhary60134 жыл бұрын
We expect more videos on such topics which divide hindus. Well done ... continue.
@rathikrishnapatro56383 жыл бұрын
Enlightenment.
@premkhade33494 жыл бұрын
What an good episode Love to listen you..Dont worry about some bhakt may critical of you without logic so..keep it up Follow you in Indian express thoroughly
@rathikrishnapatro56383 жыл бұрын
Reasonably explained.
@kamalprakash23364 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir.
@vaibhavsinghsomvanshi81413 жыл бұрын
Very nice sirji 🙏🙏🙏
@sonuKUMAR-jt2jj4 жыл бұрын
प्रणाम सर 🙏🙏 आप से एक आग्रह है कि कोर्ट की रिजर्वेशन पर फैसला सुनाने वाले जज के जजमेंट को pro merit बोलते हैं वह प्रो मेरिट नहीं प्रो जातिवादी है इसलिए वह इस तरह का फैसला सुनाता है यह कैसी विडंबना है जिस संस्था को देश में लोकतंत्र का प्रहरी कहा जाता है वहां लोकतंत्र दूर-दूर तक दिखाई नहीं देता है मैं यह बात कोई पूर्वाग्रह से ग्रसित होकर नहीं बोल रहा हूं बल्कि सच्चाई है लोकतंत्र का मतलब है शासन के सभी स्तरों पर कार्यपालिका विधायिका न्यायपालिका मैं सभी जातियों सभी धर्मों का बराबर का प्रतिनिधित्व जिसे हम इंद्रधनुषी लोकतंत्र भी कह सकते हैं। यहां तो न्यायपालिका में सिर्फ सिर्फ एक रंग ही दिखाई देता हैं अन्य रंगों की स्थिति नगण्य है। खैर लोकतंत्र में सुधार की प्रक्रिया निरंतर चलती रहती है हम उम्मीद यही कर सकते हैं आने वाले कुछ वर्षों में पिछड़ा वर्ग तथा अन्य अनुसूचित जाति जनजाति के चेतना का निर्माण होगा तो वह अपने हक और अधिकार की लड़ाई लड़ेगा
@Ravikrs924 жыл бұрын
सर आप संविधान की एक अच्छी किताब लिखिए जिससे सिविल सर्विस की तैयारी करने वाले तमाम छात्रों के लिए बेहद उपयोगी साबित हो तथा उच्चतम न्ययालय ने जितने सारे अद्यतन संसोधन एवं जजमेंट दिए है उस पर एक वार्षिक किताबें जारी करें।।। तमाम सिविल सर्विस की तैयारी करने वाले छात्रों के लिए बेहद ही उपयोगी साबित होगा क्योंकि आप सरल से सरल भाषा का प्रयोग करते है। ।।।धन्यवाद सर।।। 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@democraticindian6772
4 жыл бұрын
RAVI KUMAR lAW series ... Video book hi hai bhai...... Digital India 😂😂😂
@democraticindian6772
4 жыл бұрын
RAVI KUMAR laxmikant chacha jindabad
@mohdsalman994
4 жыл бұрын
@@democraticindian6772 DD basu bruh 🔥
@Karanbansal007
3 жыл бұрын
Constitutional Law of India-Prof. Kailash Rai is very good and easy to understand book
@tomshintha84194 жыл бұрын
Sir please do a video on Inner line permit system.. What challenges it pose on investment from outside on such states? And other challenges.
@gauravmishra334 жыл бұрын
Thnkq sir
@sumitkumar-qb8zh3 жыл бұрын
Sir please start making videos on provision and cases of reservation one by one Thank you
@AnilKumarsarolia4 жыл бұрын
🙏
@SURENDRAYADAV-ig9ok4 жыл бұрын
सर plz कुछ main word जो english मे हो उसे हिन्दी मे एक्सप्लेन कीजिए धन्यवाद
@shashikumar95254 жыл бұрын
फैजान सर..... हाई कोर्ट सुप्रीम कोर्ट के जजेस में अभी तक आरक्षण नहीं दिया गया है क्या यह क्लाउससंविधान में नहीं था या कौन सा आर्टिकल सुप्रीम कोर्ट और हाईकोर्ट में आरक्षण का पक्षधर है
@NAVNEET144
4 жыл бұрын
Please answer the question sir.
@democraticindian6772
4 жыл бұрын
Shashi Kumar Supreme court is acting like Garrentter and guardian of ""Manusmruti"" and not Constitution of India Infact Article 32 should amment as SC can issue writs if violetion of Manusruti haapen And maintain Bramhan supreamacy over other
@mohitpandey2348
4 жыл бұрын
@@democraticindian6772 kya bewakifi faila rae ho ?
@democraticindian6772
4 жыл бұрын
Mohit Pandey mirror dikhaya hai bhai Supreme court ......
@susheelaharkoli7332
4 жыл бұрын
Nice
@kapilchanwariya17164 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot sir
@rparwez62064 жыл бұрын
👌
@shekharvsingh4 жыл бұрын
Wah dir
@guitaruncle87604 жыл бұрын
Paramilitaryमें धर्म तो नहीं घुसगयाहै? Paramilitaryमें हनुमानवादी FEELINGs Establishedतोनहींहो गई? जेलोंमें Shiv_Mandirs establish करके कया reforms लाये जा चुकेहैं? Criminalsको धार्मिक बनाना, धार्मिक बिमारों को Criminals बनाने की प्रक्रिया accelerate कर दी है? सरकारीrss cadres? Call : 8178512696
@rameshrao1197
4 жыл бұрын
1 .घुस गया है.2 हुई है। ,शायद नहीं ,क्यूंकि धर्म आधारित हें 4 हाँ। इन सारी बुराइयों का सामना कैसे करें?
@jibanmurmu26524 жыл бұрын
Which constitution book should I follow so that I can easily understand ? plz tell me Sir..
@al-hindi50084 жыл бұрын
Sir pls make detail video on "why non-hindu can't be included in scheduled caste & why it wud not be the violation of article 14 & 15"..Bcz Article 341 nowhere restrict but it's presidential order which prohibit non-hindu to be included in SC..
@mukeshmeghwal75724 жыл бұрын
Sir Aap please puna pact pr video bnao.... Respect
@aftabsiddiqui40764 жыл бұрын
Respected Sir, please explain t he article 366(26c) and 342a .. and the Governor and the President role .. after 102 amendment .. will previously declared obc ..Will continue ..Or the new classes will be have to be newly notified for the purpose of Obc ,,.. Pls explain the article and it's amendment..
@c-11client364 жыл бұрын
Sir please guide us through new clat2020
@lokjeetsagar31344 жыл бұрын
Sir ,Good Evening and High Regards.. सर अमर उजाला में Adv. विराग गुप्ता जी का आर्टिकल पढ़ा। उन्होंने प्रश्न उठाया है कि अगर रिजर्वेशन को F.R माना जायेगा तो ये Basic structure का part हो जाएगा और फिर Permanant हो जाएगा,क्योंकि Basic Structure को बदला नही जा सकता,जबकि reservation को एक Temporary policy माना जाता है। कृपया इस सम्बंध में स्थिति स्पष्ट करें। शुक्रिया सर्।
@vivekkumar-iz2bh4 жыл бұрын
Must Visit FOCUS IAS PCS INSTITUTE channel for more detail discussions about the Reservation. Yesterday they uploaded the lecture about this Judgement of Supreme Court. Must Watch
@nnoor84904 жыл бұрын
13 view 3 likes Within 1 sec of uploade !!
@nnoor8490
4 жыл бұрын
Also one dislike 😄😄😄
@kamilraza8722
4 жыл бұрын
Doesn't matter
@subratsharma65054 жыл бұрын
Namskar sir one video thought of ambedkar in reservation
@sagarbrijwasi61294 жыл бұрын
Sir, constitution me use "state" word ka mtlb bharat desh h...ya bharat ke ajke rajya(state)
@power-is-law4 жыл бұрын
Sir plz make video on gauhati high court's recent judgement that land revenue receipt, elector voter ID are not proof of citizenship .
@narendranishad34973 жыл бұрын
What is the motive of reservation can you tell me sir
@rajeevkamra91203 жыл бұрын
Sir reservation in judiciary par video banaiye please aur NJAC par bhi
@rumi82883 жыл бұрын
I'm comfused with reservation and opportunities...how they differ and what ways they similar?
@rangyultimes8004 Жыл бұрын
Sir plz......provide detail pdf or video on vacant land rule in india
@Funzy100004 жыл бұрын
Respected sir, you should summarise every videos in one or two sentences at the end. It'll help us to recall the information fast.
@mohammadirfankhan50252 жыл бұрын
Please make video about Muslim can fight election for reserve seats ST, SC
@tausifkhan4162 жыл бұрын
Sir as article 15 applicable to indian citizens so discrimination on the basis of religion allowed to non Indian citizen? Means in CAA can government discriminate between Hindus and muslim as article 15applicable to indian citizens?
@haniwoodwork38764 жыл бұрын
Aaj jo halat hae hamare bharath ke is me mamara court and khanon kis tarha sudhar sakta hae hame bataen
@valenciacoutinho25903 жыл бұрын
Sir can u help me on the topic Reservations foster Equality
@user_r91454 жыл бұрын
Supreme court k collegium system pe bhi video banaaye sir!! Dekhe to sahi what merit is required for being judge !! Why most of the judge are uppercaste hindus in supreme court??
@democraticindian6772
4 жыл бұрын
Tanuj Kumar Supreme court is acting like Garrentter and guardian of ""Manusmruti"" and not Constitution of India Infact Article 32 should amment as SC can issue writs if violetion of Manusruti haapen And maintain Bramhan supreamacy over other
@randomdude9135
4 жыл бұрын
One needs to be intelligent to become judge.
@democraticindian6772
4 жыл бұрын
Random Dude yah!! Only 200 families in india too much intelligent....all other 140,00,00,000 are dumb Thats why they rotate post within family even after 70 years
@rajrao34104 жыл бұрын
Will validation of Martha reservation ...allow others to claim reservation beyond 50% like jats, gujjars, Patel's
@democraticindian6772
4 жыл бұрын
raj rao no....maratha wo ka bhi shayad null and void hoga probably
@rajrao3410
4 жыл бұрын
@@democraticindian6772 yes I also think same but Bombay HC ne upheld Kiya...
@siddharthb26334 жыл бұрын
You never answer questions on the app.
@drunkenkinght83964 жыл бұрын
Good Work sir. Please avoid using of the words "untouchables", "Acchoot". Instead of these use SC,ST, DALIT, etc. unless there is a reference to the history of these communities.
@mohitpandey2348
4 жыл бұрын
Why Dalit ?? Why not marginalised ??
@drunkenkinght8396
4 жыл бұрын
@@mohitpandey2348 there can be other community which also be marginalized like women, transgender ,LGBT.
@mohitpandey2348
4 жыл бұрын
@@drunkenkinght8396 okay...but it's better to generalize than outcasting.
@drunkenkinght8396
4 жыл бұрын
@@mohitpandey2348 you are not getting the point. There may be times when there is need to refer to a particular community - like a judgement, or history or Constitutional provision regarding a particular community. In that reference we should not use derogatory terms of the past. It's all that I am saying. I am not in favour of outcasting anyone too.
@democraticindian6772
4 жыл бұрын
drunken Kinght Untouchable thik hai.....babasaheb ne bohot baar use kia tha....historical reference aayenge us word ke
Sir, Reservation jaisi cheezein laagu karte huye Constitution banane waalo me yeh bhi likha tha ki yeh State ki duty hai ki wo yeh dekhegi ki SCst classes ko education jobs mein unka poora representation milega. Aaj 70 saal baad bhi jab yeah duty poori karne mein state safal nahin hua hai toh kya yeh baat constitution ka violation nahin hua aur iske liye zimmedaar Governments par legal actions kyun nahin liye jaayein.
@EightTuber
2 жыл бұрын
Exactly , this guy is making biased videos
@krishanashapane7644 жыл бұрын
Praivetikarn तो सविधान के खिलाफ है सरकार सविधान के खिलाफ ये कैसे काग्रेस ने लाया इसका मतलब काग्रेस को भी एससी ओबीसी के खिलाफ amendment लाया एमलायेमेंट और समाज कल्याण समाप्त किया।
@james987314 жыл бұрын
13:00 respected sir a minor correction ,its Part 16 not 15 , thank you
@Joseph_Adam.4 жыл бұрын
Women reservations are also not fundamental right, if SC ST reservations are not fundamental right. If reservation necessary of some castes , this is necessary for all classes in grounds of Right to equality (fundamental right).
@anushaeditz
4 жыл бұрын
Aap sbko same maan rhe ho isi liye aisa bol rhe ho..... Women aone apko jb same nhi maanti tbhi to unke liye alag system bnana pdta hai
@Joseph_Adam.
4 жыл бұрын
@@anushaeditz , there is not saying that women , SC, ST, OBC category are suitable only for reservation capacity, not for non reservation capacity. They are getting opportunity for reservation capacity and non reservation capacity both, as a result they are getting more opportunities. This opposes right to equality fundamental right.
@democraticindian6772
4 жыл бұрын
Ebrahim Sk Exactly.... Bhai OBC reservation bhi khatm ho gaya hai supreme court ke judgement se .... Aur Bhakt so rahe hai..... Had hoti hai mansik gulamgiri ki Mental slavery ki
@anmoltripathi50463 жыл бұрын
ha sabse pehle to hindus or sikhs ka reservation chenna chahiye
@democraticindian67724 жыл бұрын
Supreme court is acting like Garrentter and guardian of ""Manusmruti"" and not Constitution of India Infact Article 32 should amment as SC can issue writs if violetion of Manusruti haapen And maintain Bramhan supreamacy over other
@mohitpandey2348
4 жыл бұрын
Shame on you for acting so biased in the name of protesting against Manusmriti.
@democraticindian6772
4 жыл бұрын
Mohit Pandey what baised??? SC acting like this only 200 bramhan families holfing post of judges in rotation bases 2 judges ki bench 9 judges ki nagrajan bench ko kaise overrule kr sakti hai?? SC ke power ka missuse hai ye Right to life (article 21) ke under Series of subright aate hai privacy ,clean environment ,legal aid To Right to equality ke under reservation bhi fundamental right hai Reservation ka cases jyada strong hai.....16(4) mai itself likha hua hai DPSP support krta hai ....preamble me Equality Justice ka base hai aur Contition assembly debate me founding fathers ka support hai In sb mai """Sirf koi manuscript wala aisa judgement de sakta hai"""
@democraticindian6772
4 жыл бұрын
Mohit Pandey SC make mistakes so often...... Thousands time they rule and overrule again Dpsp FR and so on Recently they made mistake on SC ST act and rectify it after 2 year but damaged india as2 April bharat band killed 14 -15 dalit activist After that SC rule demolition of ravidas temple ...rectify it afterword.... Bo secret how Supreme court works
@wantedkoda1744
4 жыл бұрын
@@mohitpandey2348 jab tak Hindu dharm hai reservation rahega
@wantedkoda1744
4 жыл бұрын
@@mohitpandey2348 chup pakhandi
@alamshadab93433 жыл бұрын
Reservation is okay but radius of creamy layer should increase
@sambhajiraojadhav88144 жыл бұрын
14का ग्रुप 6 हिंदू अदर दँन ब्राम्हीन 2 ब्राम्हीन 2 SC 2 ST 1 अँग्लो व 1 ख्रिश्चन ये बदला क्यो?कैसे?किस लाँ के तहत ये बदला गया? दोराई जजमेंटमें ये माँग थी क्या?
@gururath3 жыл бұрын
If article 46 is enforceable in line with fundamental rights, then state shall also endeavour article 48 in the same line. Hypocrisy should not be there.
@mohitpandey23484 жыл бұрын
Sir, you seem to be biased at times.
@anushaeditz
4 жыл бұрын
Plz btaiye kaise....
@mohitpandey2348
4 жыл бұрын
@@anushaeditz see at 5:15 , he's saying that aksar judgements aise aa rahe hain.... I question this with full confidence that why does he only feels that judges are practising discrimination only in certain judgements in which there is a question against reservation.
@mohitpandey2348
4 жыл бұрын
@@anushaeditz again at 5:48, he's advocating just judgement. But, a judgement just for one might not be just for the other. Is there any rational bar for the same ?
@mohitpandey2348
4 жыл бұрын
@@anushaeditz 13:42, he's accusing SC of being pro merit and not pro reservation.
@democraticindian6772
4 жыл бұрын
Mohit Pandey of course!! He is Only sudhir chawdhari and Arnab and Supreme court are unbiased in these days
Пікірлер: 136
Faizan sir, Best video ever watched.....The Hindu mai Editorial likho ispe.... Yaha sirf students padhte hai The Hindu to sare intellectuals padhate hai
बहुत ही सुन्दर ढंग से समझाया हैं। धन्यवाद आपका
Prof Mustafa ! Your talks are always insightful and very enriching. One small request from those who can't understand Hindi and those who can understand Hindi at a broader level and miss the details: It would be very helpful to have English sub-titles to these videos.
Thank you sir...i was desperately waiting for this topic...
Jb. Faizan Mustafa hamare Mother - e - watan mein "Qanoon ki kitab"ki tarah hain jise hamein Padhne ki zarurat hai......!! Thanks KZread video.
Always your lectures enlighten me thank you so much
Very good 👍 analysis for justice political, social and economic eguallity for everyone civilians of India.
Thanks you sir for your effort , please give your insight on difference between equality before law and equal protection of law.
Itne assechhe ap explain kartehe ki koi confusion hi nehi rehtehe. Great work sir 🙏
Respected sir, Thank you so much for enlight us
very good researched lecture .
We expect more videos on such topics which divide hindus. Well done ... continue.
Enlightenment.
What an good episode Love to listen you..Dont worry about some bhakt may critical of you without logic so..keep it up Follow you in Indian express thoroughly
Reasonably explained.
Thank you sir.
Very nice sirji 🙏🙏🙏
प्रणाम सर 🙏🙏 आप से एक आग्रह है कि कोर्ट की रिजर्वेशन पर फैसला सुनाने वाले जज के जजमेंट को pro merit बोलते हैं वह प्रो मेरिट नहीं प्रो जातिवादी है इसलिए वह इस तरह का फैसला सुनाता है यह कैसी विडंबना है जिस संस्था को देश में लोकतंत्र का प्रहरी कहा जाता है वहां लोकतंत्र दूर-दूर तक दिखाई नहीं देता है मैं यह बात कोई पूर्वाग्रह से ग्रसित होकर नहीं बोल रहा हूं बल्कि सच्चाई है लोकतंत्र का मतलब है शासन के सभी स्तरों पर कार्यपालिका विधायिका न्यायपालिका मैं सभी जातियों सभी धर्मों का बराबर का प्रतिनिधित्व जिसे हम इंद्रधनुषी लोकतंत्र भी कह सकते हैं। यहां तो न्यायपालिका में सिर्फ सिर्फ एक रंग ही दिखाई देता हैं अन्य रंगों की स्थिति नगण्य है। खैर लोकतंत्र में सुधार की प्रक्रिया निरंतर चलती रहती है हम उम्मीद यही कर सकते हैं आने वाले कुछ वर्षों में पिछड़ा वर्ग तथा अन्य अनुसूचित जाति जनजाति के चेतना का निर्माण होगा तो वह अपने हक और अधिकार की लड़ाई लड़ेगा
सर आप संविधान की एक अच्छी किताब लिखिए जिससे सिविल सर्विस की तैयारी करने वाले तमाम छात्रों के लिए बेहद उपयोगी साबित हो तथा उच्चतम न्ययालय ने जितने सारे अद्यतन संसोधन एवं जजमेंट दिए है उस पर एक वार्षिक किताबें जारी करें।।। तमाम सिविल सर्विस की तैयारी करने वाले छात्रों के लिए बेहद ही उपयोगी साबित होगा क्योंकि आप सरल से सरल भाषा का प्रयोग करते है। ।।।धन्यवाद सर।।। 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@democraticindian6772
4 жыл бұрын
RAVI KUMAR lAW series ... Video book hi hai bhai...... Digital India 😂😂😂
@democraticindian6772
4 жыл бұрын
RAVI KUMAR laxmikant chacha jindabad
@mohdsalman994
4 жыл бұрын
@@democraticindian6772 DD basu bruh 🔥
@Karanbansal007
3 жыл бұрын
Constitutional Law of India-Prof. Kailash Rai is very good and easy to understand book
Sir please do a video on Inner line permit system.. What challenges it pose on investment from outside on such states? And other challenges.
Thnkq sir
Sir please start making videos on provision and cases of reservation one by one Thank you
🙏
सर plz कुछ main word जो english मे हो उसे हिन्दी मे एक्सप्लेन कीजिए धन्यवाद
फैजान सर..... हाई कोर्ट सुप्रीम कोर्ट के जजेस में अभी तक आरक्षण नहीं दिया गया है क्या यह क्लाउससंविधान में नहीं था या कौन सा आर्टिकल सुप्रीम कोर्ट और हाईकोर्ट में आरक्षण का पक्षधर है
@NAVNEET144
4 жыл бұрын
Please answer the question sir.
@democraticindian6772
4 жыл бұрын
Shashi Kumar Supreme court is acting like Garrentter and guardian of ""Manusmruti"" and not Constitution of India Infact Article 32 should amment as SC can issue writs if violetion of Manusruti haapen And maintain Bramhan supreamacy over other
@mohitpandey2348
4 жыл бұрын
@@democraticindian6772 kya bewakifi faila rae ho ?
@democraticindian6772
4 жыл бұрын
Mohit Pandey mirror dikhaya hai bhai Supreme court ......
@susheelaharkoli7332
4 жыл бұрын
Nice
Thanks a lot sir
👌
Wah dir
Paramilitaryमें धर्म तो नहीं घुसगयाहै? Paramilitaryमें हनुमानवादी FEELINGs Establishedतोनहींहो गई? जेलोंमें Shiv_Mandirs establish करके कया reforms लाये जा चुकेहैं? Criminalsको धार्मिक बनाना, धार्मिक बिमारों को Criminals बनाने की प्रक्रिया accelerate कर दी है? सरकारीrss cadres? Call : 8178512696
@rameshrao1197
4 жыл бұрын
1 .घुस गया है.2 हुई है। ,शायद नहीं ,क्यूंकि धर्म आधारित हें 4 हाँ। इन सारी बुराइयों का सामना कैसे करें?
Which constitution book should I follow so that I can easily understand ? plz tell me Sir..
Sir pls make detail video on "why non-hindu can't be included in scheduled caste & why it wud not be the violation of article 14 & 15"..Bcz Article 341 nowhere restrict but it's presidential order which prohibit non-hindu to be included in SC..
Sir Aap please puna pact pr video bnao.... Respect
Respected Sir, please explain t he article 366(26c) and 342a .. and the Governor and the President role .. after 102 amendment .. will previously declared obc ..Will continue ..Or the new classes will be have to be newly notified for the purpose of Obc ,,.. Pls explain the article and it's amendment..
Sir please guide us through new clat2020
Sir ,Good Evening and High Regards.. सर अमर उजाला में Adv. विराग गुप्ता जी का आर्टिकल पढ़ा। उन्होंने प्रश्न उठाया है कि अगर रिजर्वेशन को F.R माना जायेगा तो ये Basic structure का part हो जाएगा और फिर Permanant हो जाएगा,क्योंकि Basic Structure को बदला नही जा सकता,जबकि reservation को एक Temporary policy माना जाता है। कृपया इस सम्बंध में स्थिति स्पष्ट करें। शुक्रिया सर्।
Must Visit FOCUS IAS PCS INSTITUTE channel for more detail discussions about the Reservation. Yesterday they uploaded the lecture about this Judgement of Supreme Court. Must Watch
13 view 3 likes Within 1 sec of uploade !!
@nnoor8490
4 жыл бұрын
Also one dislike 😄😄😄
@kamilraza8722
4 жыл бұрын
Doesn't matter
Namskar sir one video thought of ambedkar in reservation
Sir, constitution me use "state" word ka mtlb bharat desh h...ya bharat ke ajke rajya(state)
Sir plz make video on gauhati high court's recent judgement that land revenue receipt, elector voter ID are not proof of citizenship .
What is the motive of reservation can you tell me sir
Sir reservation in judiciary par video banaiye please aur NJAC par bhi
I'm comfused with reservation and opportunities...how they differ and what ways they similar?
Sir plz......provide detail pdf or video on vacant land rule in india
Respected sir, you should summarise every videos in one or two sentences at the end. It'll help us to recall the information fast.
Please make video about Muslim can fight election for reserve seats ST, SC
Sir as article 15 applicable to indian citizens so discrimination on the basis of religion allowed to non Indian citizen? Means in CAA can government discriminate between Hindus and muslim as article 15applicable to indian citizens?
Aaj jo halat hae hamare bharath ke is me mamara court and khanon kis tarha sudhar sakta hae hame bataen
Sir can u help me on the topic Reservations foster Equality
Supreme court k collegium system pe bhi video banaaye sir!! Dekhe to sahi what merit is required for being judge !! Why most of the judge are uppercaste hindus in supreme court??
@democraticindian6772
4 жыл бұрын
Tanuj Kumar Supreme court is acting like Garrentter and guardian of ""Manusmruti"" and not Constitution of India Infact Article 32 should amment as SC can issue writs if violetion of Manusruti haapen And maintain Bramhan supreamacy over other
@randomdude9135
4 жыл бұрын
One needs to be intelligent to become judge.
@democraticindian6772
4 жыл бұрын
Random Dude yah!! Only 200 families in india too much intelligent....all other 140,00,00,000 are dumb Thats why they rotate post within family even after 70 years
Will validation of Martha reservation ...allow others to claim reservation beyond 50% like jats, gujjars, Patel's
@democraticindian6772
4 жыл бұрын
raj rao no....maratha wo ka bhi shayad null and void hoga probably
@rajrao3410
4 жыл бұрын
@@democraticindian6772 yes I also think same but Bombay HC ne upheld Kiya...
You never answer questions on the app.
Good Work sir. Please avoid using of the words "untouchables", "Acchoot". Instead of these use SC,ST, DALIT, etc. unless there is a reference to the history of these communities.
@mohitpandey2348
4 жыл бұрын
Why Dalit ?? Why not marginalised ??
@drunkenkinght8396
4 жыл бұрын
@@mohitpandey2348 there can be other community which also be marginalized like women, transgender ,LGBT.
@mohitpandey2348
4 жыл бұрын
@@drunkenkinght8396 okay...but it's better to generalize than outcasting.
@drunkenkinght8396
4 жыл бұрын
@@mohitpandey2348 you are not getting the point. There may be times when there is need to refer to a particular community - like a judgement, or history or Constitutional provision regarding a particular community. In that reference we should not use derogatory terms of the past. It's all that I am saying. I am not in favour of outcasting anyone too.
@democraticindian6772
4 жыл бұрын
drunken Kinght Untouchable thik hai.....babasaheb ne bohot baar use kia tha....historical reference aayenge us word ke
If.any.one.claime.is.made.by.illigaly.in.addmission.in.proffessinal.collaesge.what.will.be.the.concequns
Sir mujhe aap ka no chahiye plz
Sir, Reservation jaisi cheezein laagu karte huye Constitution banane waalo me yeh bhi likha tha ki yeh State ki duty hai ki wo yeh dekhegi ki SCst classes ko education jobs mein unka poora representation milega. Aaj 70 saal baad bhi jab yeah duty poori karne mein state safal nahin hua hai toh kya yeh baat constitution ka violation nahin hua aur iske liye zimmedaar Governments par legal actions kyun nahin liye jaayein.
@EightTuber
2 жыл бұрын
Exactly , this guy is making biased videos
Praivetikarn तो सविधान के खिलाफ है सरकार सविधान के खिलाफ ये कैसे काग्रेस ने लाया इसका मतलब काग्रेस को भी एससी ओबीसी के खिलाफ amendment लाया एमलायेमेंट और समाज कल्याण समाप्त किया।
13:00 respected sir a minor correction ,its Part 16 not 15 , thank you
Women reservations are also not fundamental right, if SC ST reservations are not fundamental right. If reservation necessary of some castes , this is necessary for all classes in grounds of Right to equality (fundamental right).
@anushaeditz
4 жыл бұрын
Aap sbko same maan rhe ho isi liye aisa bol rhe ho..... Women aone apko jb same nhi maanti tbhi to unke liye alag system bnana pdta hai
@Joseph_Adam.
4 жыл бұрын
@@anushaeditz , there is not saying that women , SC, ST, OBC category are suitable only for reservation capacity, not for non reservation capacity. They are getting opportunity for reservation capacity and non reservation capacity both, as a result they are getting more opportunities. This opposes right to equality fundamental right.
@democraticindian6772
4 жыл бұрын
Ebrahim Sk Exactly.... Bhai OBC reservation bhi khatm ho gaya hai supreme court ke judgement se .... Aur Bhakt so rahe hai..... Had hoti hai mansik gulamgiri ki Mental slavery ki
ha sabse pehle to hindus or sikhs ka reservation chenna chahiye
Supreme court is acting like Garrentter and guardian of ""Manusmruti"" and not Constitution of India Infact Article 32 should amment as SC can issue writs if violetion of Manusruti haapen And maintain Bramhan supreamacy over other
@mohitpandey2348
4 жыл бұрын
Shame on you for acting so biased in the name of protesting against Manusmriti.
@democraticindian6772
4 жыл бұрын
Mohit Pandey what baised??? SC acting like this only 200 bramhan families holfing post of judges in rotation bases 2 judges ki bench 9 judges ki nagrajan bench ko kaise overrule kr sakti hai?? SC ke power ka missuse hai ye Right to life (article 21) ke under Series of subright aate hai privacy ,clean environment ,legal aid To Right to equality ke under reservation bhi fundamental right hai Reservation ka cases jyada strong hai.....16(4) mai itself likha hua hai DPSP support krta hai ....preamble me Equality Justice ka base hai aur Contition assembly debate me founding fathers ka support hai In sb mai """Sirf koi manuscript wala aisa judgement de sakta hai"""
@democraticindian6772
4 жыл бұрын
Mohit Pandey SC make mistakes so often...... Thousands time they rule and overrule again Dpsp FR and so on Recently they made mistake on SC ST act and rectify it after 2 year but damaged india as2 April bharat band killed 14 -15 dalit activist After that SC rule demolition of ravidas temple ...rectify it afterword.... Bo secret how Supreme court works
@wantedkoda1744
4 жыл бұрын
@@mohitpandey2348 jab tak Hindu dharm hai reservation rahega
@wantedkoda1744
4 жыл бұрын
@@mohitpandey2348 chup pakhandi
Reservation is okay but radius of creamy layer should increase
14का ग्रुप 6 हिंदू अदर दँन ब्राम्हीन 2 ब्राम्हीन 2 SC 2 ST 1 अँग्लो व 1 ख्रिश्चन ये बदला क्यो?कैसे?किस लाँ के तहत ये बदला गया? दोराई जजमेंटमें ये माँग थी क्या?
If article 46 is enforceable in line with fundamental rights, then state shall also endeavour article 48 in the same line. Hypocrisy should not be there.
Sir, you seem to be biased at times.
@anushaeditz
4 жыл бұрын
Plz btaiye kaise....
@mohitpandey2348
4 жыл бұрын
@@anushaeditz see at 5:15 , he's saying that aksar judgements aise aa rahe hain.... I question this with full confidence that why does he only feels that judges are practising discrimination only in certain judgements in which there is a question against reservation.
@mohitpandey2348
4 жыл бұрын
@@anushaeditz again at 5:48, he's advocating just judgement. But, a judgement just for one might not be just for the other. Is there any rational bar for the same ?
@mohitpandey2348
4 жыл бұрын
@@anushaeditz 13:42, he's accusing SC of being pro merit and not pro reservation.
@democraticindian6772
4 жыл бұрын
Mohit Pandey of course!! He is Only sudhir chawdhari and Arnab and Supreme court are unbiased in these days
Bjp Chor & Co. Pvt Ltd.