Confirmatory Factor Analysis; Patrick Sturgis (part 3 of 6)

Professor Patrick Sturgis, NCRM director, in the third (of three) part of the Structural Equiation Modeling NCRM online course.
This video is part of the online learning resources from the National Centre for Research Methods (NCRM). To access the supporting materials (presentation slides, datasets, recommended reading, links to related publications and resources) visit www.ncrm.ac.uk/resources/onlin...

Пікірлер: 67

  • @dongxu2257
    @dongxu22572 жыл бұрын

    As a professor myself, I truly appreciate the way Prof. Sturgis present the course - focusing on intuition rather than mathematics, which in my view is of great importance for non-statistical students.

  • @mbonezakabanda7971
    @mbonezakabanda79713 жыл бұрын

    I enjoy the way the Professor explains SEM so that even beginners can understand. Great job, Professor.

  • @annabellegadabu7566
    @annabellegadabu75665 жыл бұрын

    i like the way you explain things slowly and at ease. for someone unfamiliar with statistical analysis at all it's been helpful in understanding SEM. Great job Professor

  • @MCshaneization
    @MCshaneization4 жыл бұрын

    As a stats instructor myself I am very impressed by the clarity and concision of your presentation. Great job!

  • @tenkolew
    @tenkolew3 жыл бұрын

    The best learning resource I’ve found so far. On point. Clear. Your style calms any anxiety

  • @joseannknight8820
    @joseannknight88205 жыл бұрын

    The explanations here are simple yet insightful. A great job Professor!

  • @kevinkelly1960
    @kevinkelly19607 жыл бұрын

    Fantastic 3 lectures. Brilliant. Thank you for sharing, Kevin

  • @wjingzhou1967
    @wjingzhou19674 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much for your concise and clear explaination of SEM in such a slow and elegant way! Gorgeous!

  • @baburajesh1000
    @baburajesh10003 жыл бұрын

    Respected professor, Thank you so much for providing more insights on SEM and many of the researchers will get benefited from your teachings.

  • @kiwanukajoseph6668
    @kiwanukajoseph66684 жыл бұрын

    IAM really impressed by the clarity and concision of your presentation. Great job prof !

  • @KarthikSrinivasanTucson
    @KarthikSrinivasanTucson7 жыл бұрын

    Enjoyed all three talks. Very well made. Thank you

  • @afpierson
    @afpierson7 жыл бұрын

    This guy is a great speaker and very articulate. Thank you, Professor Sturgis. You took a very complicated topic and made it simple by breaking it down in three separate videos.

  • @jonathanstudentkit

    @jonathanstudentkit

    6 жыл бұрын

    he's a very bad speaker loads of ehs, for instance and it's way too slow to stay interested

  • @Deborah28277
    @Deborah282772 жыл бұрын

    I’ve watched your videos over and over, each time my SEM understanding increases .. this time around the AHA moment occurred within the Mean Structure discussion , specifically reflexive vs formative indicators when measuring constructs like social capital and imposter syndrome.

  • @bugendijoseph1313
    @bugendijoseph13133 жыл бұрын

    I really enjoy alot listening to professor Patrick sessions on SEM

  • @areejalmehdar8467
    @areejalmehdar84677 жыл бұрын

    amazing lectures! Thank you very much indeed

  • @wissamkheir
    @wissamkheir6 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much for this ! Very clear and concise !

  • @oindrilamukherjee6030
    @oindrilamukherjee60302 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much Professor, it has been so insightful and helpful learning from you!

  • @dr.vincentkibambila3003
    @dr.vincentkibambila30034 жыл бұрын

    Nice work Professor, I like your style of teaching. May God Lord Protect you

  • @l.3890
    @l.38906 жыл бұрын

    Thank you! finally I could understand SEM!

  • @mafaldacampos799
    @mafaldacampos7993 жыл бұрын

    Been watching these videos to help me with my master's thesis and it has been a great help. Thank you!

  • @yingc1233
    @yingc12333 жыл бұрын

    Great series, thank you!

  • @Josefk40
    @Josefk404 жыл бұрын

    This is an awesome lecture. Thank you

  • @MayadaMAref
    @MayadaMAref7 жыл бұрын

    thank you for these very informative lectures

  • @syafiqsidqisaidi6337
    @syafiqsidqisaidi63373 жыл бұрын

    thanks Prof on the lecture ! really helpful may God Bless you

  • @Moe4572
    @Moe4572 Жыл бұрын

    Seriously saving me right now :) Can't thank you enough!

  • @AngeloYeo
    @AngeloYeo7 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for such a nice lecture :)

  • @students4life821
    @students4life8213 жыл бұрын

    I need to like this video twice. What a great explanation!

  • @mbonezakabanda7971

    @mbonezakabanda7971

    3 жыл бұрын

    Me too

  • @madaraogot5322
    @madaraogot53226 жыл бұрын

    Great information, thanks.

  • @niklaskonig4278
    @niklaskonig42787 жыл бұрын

    Great lecture. Thank you! Just noticed, on the first slide "Two Factor, Six Item EFA" there is an one-headed-arrow missing between eta2 and x3. But anyway, great lecture!

  • @MBC999able
    @MBC999able5 жыл бұрын

    Brilliant lecture

  • @sintakristanti6108
    @sintakristanti61084 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much, very very helpful!!! Please keep making video ...

  • @mikojavier2435
    @mikojavier24352 жыл бұрын

    thank you,very clear explanation

  • @isaackosi2889
    @isaackosi28897 жыл бұрын

    Thanks very much for the insight

  • @wansitihajar5558
    @wansitihajar55583 жыл бұрын

    Thank you Prof, it is informative and came in hand for my research. I have a question regarding the high order factors structure. Why is that the errrors are no longer respective to their observed indicators? such that error 3 points to indicator 1 etc?

  • @pauljoseph9276
    @pauljoseph92764 жыл бұрын

    Great lecture Prof. you make it very simple to understand. How can i analyse path analysis with categorical data?

  • @kswill4514
    @kswill45145 жыл бұрын

    Better than I've learnt from school

  • @kritiarora7585
    @kritiarora75852 жыл бұрын

    Hi! Thank you for this great explanation of the CFA. I wanted to ask what is the difference between item parcelling and the higher order factor model? Is item parceling a special case of higher order factor model?

  • @barbarabomfim7408
    @barbarabomfim74087 жыл бұрын

    Very informative!

  • @laxmanpokhrel2091
    @laxmanpokhrel20917 жыл бұрын

    Remarkably crafted presentation and contents ...Great learning experience...Thank you. ..

  • @michaelpaulse1
    @michaelpaulse14 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for great lectures! How do I calculate apriori sample size for CFA - I have seven 1st order and one 2nd order latent variables. Observable items 120 questions predominantly Likert type. Could you please assist?

  • @pulkit21aug
    @pulkit21aug5 жыл бұрын

    Prof Patrick Sturgis - could you please confirm apart from psychology can SEM be used in other domain e.g. econometrics , finance , sentiment analysis ?

  • @The-TAPT-Talks
    @The-TAPT-Talks4 жыл бұрын

    Hi professor Can we use 5 levels scale as bellows: -2 -1 0 1 2 for EFA, CFA, SEM analysis?

  • @DrMichael_Psychology
    @DrMichael_Psychology7 жыл бұрын

    That's great, very appreciative. Small note: at minute 18 there are only 5 single-headed arrows going from the latent variables to the indicators, not 6.

  • @MohsinUlAminKhan

    @MohsinUlAminKhan

    7 жыл бұрын

    That's only for n2, not n1. I guess that is just an unintentional mistake.

  • @priyankagupta2813
    @priyankagupta28134 жыл бұрын

    sir add a line from n2 to x3 @ 18:32.......Your explanation is really v good, easy to understand

  • @Hibahfarah
    @Hibahfarah2 жыл бұрын

    Thanks prof. I suggest to give numerical example and clarify each step. Only theory would not be understandable for everyone. Thus if could prepare a numerical example to explain the steps friendly.

  • @artimalik1126
    @artimalik11262 жыл бұрын

    Sir, my topic is to measure impact of work-life balance on job satisfaction. I measured these two through different constructs.Items were taken from existing questionnaires of different authors. I combined few constructs and I added and deleted some items form constructs. What should I use CFA or EFA and why. Sir, please guide

  • @simplyram2676
    @simplyram2676 Жыл бұрын

    Hi Dr., how if discriminant validity is NOT met after CFA? But model fit and convergent validity is met. What should we do? Can I do EFA?

  • @texla-kh9qx
    @texla-kh9qx6 ай бұрын

    Could someone explain what is the definition of degrees of freedom here? Naively, I thought degrees of freedom are free model parameters, but this is in contradictory to the use of the term in the lecture. If we apply constraints, the number of free parameters decreases and hence the model becomes less flexible (less capable). How do I understand the fact that the less flexibility implies the larger number of degrees of freedom?

  • @javeda
    @javeda6 жыл бұрын

    Can our observed exogenous and endogenous variables be continuous and categorical (dichotomous,ordinal, binary) simultaneoulsy, if yes which software is most appropriate for conducting CFA and SEM then alongside moderation and mediation analyses.

  • @kunmunmishra1555

    @kunmunmishra1555

    5 жыл бұрын

    It can be done in AMOS

  • @Goliad2016
    @Goliad20163 ай бұрын

    dear professor if you can please show how to calculate sample size in structural equation model !!!

  • @adilzia
    @adilzia4 жыл бұрын

    i like your explanation #CFA

  • @isaackwao608
    @isaackwao6082 жыл бұрын

    please prof what is NNI in one factor CFA ?

  • @fernandojackson7207
    @fernandojackson72076 жыл бұрын

    I also enjoyed and understood well, but I am really craving an actual example

  • @shobhitchaturvedi4866

    @shobhitchaturvedi4866

    5 жыл бұрын

    Without an apt example...all this has no real flavour

  • @mugomuiruri2313
    @mugomuiruri23137 ай бұрын

    good

  • @yosefsol8262
    @yosefsol82623 жыл бұрын

    I still don't see why it is required that students have to do SEM thesis, or a thesis at least

  • @nazdezigns31
    @nazdezigns31 Жыл бұрын

    25:00

  • @sethjchandler
    @sethjchandler10 ай бұрын

    Perhaps it is just me, but I find it very hard to fully grasp the material without worked examples. Some code or pseudo-code that made the procedures more precise would have been very useful. Everyone has their own learning style, but the one used here does not work for me.

  • @jonathanstudentkit
    @jonathanstudentkit6 жыл бұрын

    eh eh eh eh eh eh eh eh eh

  • @shawnmiller6147

    @shawnmiller6147

    5 жыл бұрын

    Get a life! If you are so bothered by the eh's then don't watch! Better yet, if you're so damn great, make your own video! I watch the video to learn about SEM, NOT to worry about speech patterns.

  • @DonJonston

    @DonJonston

    4 жыл бұрын

    thank you for ruining a very, very helpful video. Be better. Fuck you

  • @laxmanpokhrel2091
    @laxmanpokhrel20917 жыл бұрын

    Remarkably crafted presentation and contents ...Great learning experience...Thank you. ..