Reviewing Changes and Rework for All Factions in new Company of Heroes 2 Commander Patch Update. I think that not much changed in general but Germans got better shuffle. *What are your opinions?*

@user-cl4kc4st7z

3 жыл бұрын

First of all: Thank you for the video. In comparison to ALL another people who did similar content, you showed COMMANDERS, not abilities, so, thanks to that, we know that "old faces, that provides new dangers". Audio (even with that microphone stroke🤷) overall is also great.

@strategydux

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-cl4kc4st7z hahaha thanks man :D

@user-cl4kc4st7z

3 жыл бұрын

@@strategydux when and where are field tests? Although I can't support by money, at least I can give some ideas (it fact, that video can easily generate PAGES of feedback, it's just I am also little busy, and very lazy).

@strategydux

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-cl4kc4st7z I havent made field tests back than as it was first iteration of changes and would have more later so i just did the review of general changes which will be same later on again and have same impact

@user-cl4kc4st7z

3 жыл бұрын

@@strategydux oh, I understand that making up to date content - extremely difficult task, but... But it will help you to understand changes more clearly (my phrase about pages of text isn't just empty words; almost every doctrine can get speech of THAT length).

We could’ve gotten new commanders for usf okw and British instead of reshuffling abilities for commanders but whaddya think?

@strategydux

3 жыл бұрын

Agree. If you want something similar to a new commander Ostheer and Soviets will have much more flavour changes. I am working on an idea On how to make a system in gamr so you can make your commander. I will make a video on it.

All faction but without USF?

12:56 As example of "size" let's look at the storm doctrine: Storm doctrine was SERIOUSLY changed. I can't see flavour; I noticed changing it from strong mass regime doctrine into good at solo ladder. Riegel mine it's not something really OP, but some talented people (who CAN effectively realise it) can use IMMOBILIZATION (not just damaged engine, that will only slow down enemy's big (and expensive 😜😜😜☠️☠️☠️) vehicle) to FINISH ☠️☠️☠️ it. In comparison to that, WM jaegers is more 1 vs 1 oriented unit (of course, performance of one of the best infantry squads in the game even at the mass regimes is also great, BUT only squad per player isn't something that can seriously influence on the situation. Flare by jaegers - not bad, but range of fusilier's flare is still little longer (also, 3 squads of fusiliers mean 3 flares). Smoke by jaegers - absolutely not bad, but usually in mass regimes another options (even better) are available. As example - smoke by mortar/LeiG (bigger range, also it's FREE). P.S. grenadiers on steroids (5 models, instant and free camouflage upgrade, triple G43 for free) is really good thing, but sometimes IMMOBILIZATION and killing of dangerous IS 2/Comet/KV 2/ISU 152 is much more useful.

Com-Mi-Sar my friend not commissioner haha Still great video

@strategydux

3 жыл бұрын

hahaha thank you comrade :D

Whaaat??! Removing artillery flares from spec ops makes this commander basically trash. You pick this commander for it's recon. Who deploys sturm officers anyway?

@strategydux

3 жыл бұрын

I though so also. But Pantera got a flares as its vet abaility so you still have flairs its just that its locked behind a unit you have to call late game now

@user-cl4kc4st7z

3 жыл бұрын

@@strategydux in general - it's nerf (instead of 3 CP ability, that can be used EVERYWHERE on the field) we got something LITTLE cheaper, but with MUCH higher requirements. But we can't do anything with this (this is not only example, another long range, long term not showdownable recon abilities were also nerfed/entirely deleted). So, be prepared for artillery spam🤷🤷🤷😭😭😭🤦🤦🤦

not bad not good

@strategydux

3 жыл бұрын

thanks