Collusion and Oligopoly, 25-Marker Walkthrough

🌟 A-Level Economics Students, this one's for you! 🌟
🚀 Boost Your Exam Performance
Get ready to enhance your understanding with this comprehensive walkthrough of a 25-marker question on collusion and high market share, designed for Edexcel A-Level Economics Paper 1. We'll delve into key topics, including oligopoly, natural monopolies, and game theory, providing insights to help you excel.
📚 What You'll Learn
💡 Breakdown of key economic concepts
📝 Strategies for structuring your answers
📈 Insights into Edexcel A-Level Economics Paper 1
🎯 Tips for tackling challenging questions
🌐 Additional Support
Looking for more resources? Check out our website, econsupport.com, where you'll find a wealth of free materials for A-Level Economics students, including:
📖 Topic notes
📜 Past paper questions
📝 Study guides
🎉 Join the Community
If this video helps you, don't forget to like, subscribe, and share it with your fellow students. Together, we can conquer A-Level Economics!

Пікірлер: 17

  • @nattycarey2083
    @nattycarey20832 ай бұрын

    Thank you🙏

  • @Joe.Z.L
    @Joe.Z.L2 ай бұрын

    How would you draw the game theory graph showing short term and long term differences

  • @kumidaley9729
    @kumidaley97292 ай бұрын

    In evaluation, could you talk about how if it is say a five firm oligopoly, you would need all five firms to collude otherwise the theory of kinked demand would kick in.

  • @xxminecrafterxx1266

    @xxminecrafterxx1266

    2 ай бұрын

    yes an evaluation of whether or not collusion will ocur is if the concentration ratio of the market is low, cooperation between all firms is unlikely compared to if there was a high concentration ratio meaning there is increased likehood of the collusive agreement from being broken #

  • @RS-vg7yc

    @RS-vg7yc

    2 ай бұрын

    Yeh and you need the biggest firm in the market

  • @rubentaheem
    @rubentaheem2 ай бұрын

    could you use game theory as an application/analysis in any way?

  • @elliot2392
    @elliot23922 ай бұрын

    Could you evaluate the second KAA with the fact that predatory pricing/ overt collusion is illegal - resulting in large fines and diminished brand reputation?

  • @ella_mcgov2013

    @ella_mcgov2013

    2 ай бұрын

    Yes and you could also talk about how collusion might break down because of whistleblowers and how they gain incentive to whistle blow and break agreement

  • @kwayvldn3682

    @kwayvldn3682

    2 ай бұрын

    @@ella_mcgov2013that’s where the game theory comes in right?

  • @ella_mcgov2013

    @ella_mcgov2013

    2 ай бұрын

    @@kwayvldn3682 Yep talking about the prisoner strategy ect firms will always do what is best for them

  • @ella_mcgov2013

    @ella_mcgov2013

    2 ай бұрын

    @@kwayvldn3682Yep

  • @rlnn17
    @rlnn172 ай бұрын

    Could you talk about how collusion allows struggling firms to remain competitive when having to deal with regulation policies?

  • @bobthebuilder6545

    @bobthebuilder6545

    2 ай бұрын

    The basic principle of a successful collusion is that it can allow you to make a greater increase in the profits gained. This is because it essentially leaves consumers no choice but to buy their goods. In the case of struggling firms the collusion allows them to gain profits and with this they are able to invest this money back into their business essentially R&D. This would allow them to create higher quality goods and this would make them more competitive since consumers often prefer high quality goods. I’m pretty sure u evaluate it with there may be brand loyalty so struggling firms can’t compete or something like that. Answer may not be perfect since I just thought of this on the spot lol

  • @bobthebuilder6545

    @bobthebuilder6545

    2 ай бұрын

    Also to link it to regulation policies the r&d allows them to gain the funding necessary to create a good in higher quality and still follow regulation policy

  • @JackAttar
    @JackAttar2 ай бұрын

    Do you not have to use the source ?

  • @breadst1c772

    @breadst1c772

    2 ай бұрын

    no, not for the 25 marker in paper 1 and 2

  • @sxm261

    @sxm261

    2 ай бұрын

    I believe if there is Info provided above when doing a 25 marker you can use it as context.