Civil War -- Why I Hated This Movie -- An Honest Movie Review

Substack -- please subscribe to support this channel: learningaboutmovies.substack....
Please follow me on Twitter for video releases and reviews: / drjoshmatthews
Letterboxd: letterboxd.com/joshmatthews/
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @learningaboutmovies
Understanding Movies 101 Course: joshmatthews.org/learn-more-a...
The Great Movies Series: joshmatthews.org/what-makes-t...
Comprehensive List of the Great Movies Series: joshmatthews.org/what-makes-t...
Movie Cliches Series -- Video Playlist: • Why Pianos Transform C...
The Great Directors Series -- Playlist: • Werner Herzog's 10 Gre...
Shot for Shot Analyses: • Understanding Movies 1...
Great Science-Fiction Movie List: joshmatthews.org/great-scienc...
Other Movie Lists: joshmatthews.org/topics/movie...
Disclaimer: All reasonable comments are welcome, including reasoned disagreements. You will be banned for foolish talk, harassment, and hate speech on sight; it's a tremendous waste of life. I believe in freedom of association and, by extension, freedom of dissociation from you.

Пікірлер: 482

  • @LearningaboutMovies
    @LearningaboutMovies

    My fuller, more reasoned views of this movie are on Substack here --

  • @FlippedNormal
    @FlippedNormal

    This movie feels like a 12 year old wrote it.

  • @TheExperiment24
    @TheExperiment24

    This was the most honest review I've heard. I just wasted $30 to see this in theaters and I've never left a movie Angry about getting ripped off

  • @charliekuster3417
    @charliekuster3417

    So many plotholes

  • @84paratize
    @84paratize

    I strongly disliked it as well!

  • @orlandoholwerda2373
    @orlandoholwerda237314 күн бұрын

    They dropped the ball harder on this movie than the secret service at the Trump rally.

  • @shatnose
    @shatnose

    The most realistic part is how the POTUS ignores the fully equiped bunker with escape routes and just hangs out in the WH protected by secret service armed with Regan era 80's tech.

  • @Nerdzombiedisco
    @Nerdzombiedisco

    Hated it. Mainly watched for the photo journalist stuff and for Kirsten. Felt like a zombie movie without the zombies. And the ending/character resolutions was terrible.

  • @salvyballacc
    @salvyballacc

    They really had a chance to make a stupid great movie and just decided took a huge Dookie on it instead and made it about journalism 🤣🤣

  • @TheyRiseBand
    @TheyRiseBand

    The most ridiculous thing about this movie is, Texas and California teaming up.

  • @horuslupercal9936
    @horuslupercal9936

    I felt like this was a poor man's "Children of Men". If you want Dystopian Future, that's your movie.

  • @shaz_films
    @shaz_films

    Hated this film....should have been called JESSIE:THE ORIGIN OF A PHOTOGRAPHER 😑🙈

  • @DonaldAMisc
    @DonaldAMisc

    As YMS said in his review of the movie, don't go into this movie expecting an explanation for the California/Texas situation, that the film could've been set anywhere but just happened to be the US. Most critics seem to love it regardless, go figure. 🤷‍♂️

  • @drdavid1963
    @drdavid1963

    Hi Josh, having seen some other glowing reviews of this film, I thought I might come back and ask a question. Others seem to be under the impression that the film is intentionally ambiguous (ie. it is not designed as a narrative fiction with good guys and bad guys for the audience to root for or against but to reflect on the depiction of a world where it is difficult to recognise who is who) because it is a cautionary tale about the divisiveness in modern day America rather than a science-fiction movie. They seem to read the film's intentions as to provoke discussion about this potentially fatal divisiveness rather than to create a fantastical depiction of some far-off future dystopia.

  • @user-wv8oh4kk7q
    @user-wv8oh4kk7q

    We just got up & left from it 15 mins ago! It’s boring, and all about two photographers filming weird random acts of violence with no point. Horrible movie! Don’t waste your money!

  • @MaskMan-bx6kr
    @MaskMan-bx6kr

    The war aspect, the cinematography of this movie is good, I wish this movie focus more on the war and how it got started instead of making a bunch of insufferable characters which the group of photoshop journalists as the main protagonists. I said in my rant video that they should of called this movie "The Press" since they're the main focus of the movie

  • @42hamneggs
    @42hamneggs

    I liked this movie. I went in very doubtful, came out quite impressed by the way it had avoided the trap of a polarized audience. It's definitely not for people who need a Hollywood standard package. I particularly liked the way it did not try to explain, message or propgandise political positions. I did not take it as glorifying journalism either. Quite the reverse. What it did do was take real world examples of war violence seen in other countries and place it in US towns. A glimpse of the insanity of a war. The gun violence, destruction and emotional reaction was very different to your regular Hollywood heroics. The story was very reminiscent of Apocalypse Now (aka Heart of Darkness). Not saying its a great movie. It has flaws. It was nice to see something outside the regular cookie cutter template. By the way it's not science fiction. It's speculative fiction.

  • @UpperCrustthe3rd
    @UpperCrustthe3rd

    Wooooah journalism is so cool!

  • @CoinOpTV
    @CoinOpTV

    doh! maybe i’ll have to wait for streaming! In other news - have you sampled the Fallout show that just dropped on Prime?

  • @startingover1
    @startingover1

    Hated it. A waste of time.